|• harro87: here's the facts: Moore costs $125,500 in DT and $139,200 in SC. Here's a couple of backline players that were cheaper at round 1: Maguire, Nason, Silvagni. All scoring well in both..all a lot better choices then Moore. Here's a couple of forward line players that were cheaper at round 1: Rockliff, Podsiadly, Peterson. All scoring well in both..again all a lot better choices then Moore.
What I am trying to point out (albeit harshly and unfairly to the poor man that asked the question), was that there are at least 3 or 4 better players per position then young Moore. Players that are cheaper, play better, and are subsequently worth more now.
What you are failing to see here in your ramblings, is that novice individuals such as yourself, should never have considered Moore in this climate, with the vast options of better players being offered. I think you'll find a lot of people tend to agree with me when I say that this used to be a gentlemen's game before beginners like you came along and started saying comments that make people like myself angry.
This website also used to be quite the good place to go and discuss meaningful, intelligent insights about how players were performing in fantasy football. But again, people like yourself are ruining it, and again, a lot of people will say that my comment was harsh, but fair, as when I see these comments, I respond appropriately.
If you say something intelligent, then rest assured I won't harass you. - xavjustice - 88 months ago|
|• If ya read Monty's post pre round 1 he said once Chaplin was back in round 2 the backline rookies would struggle to get a game, Yes i think Moore will play again this year but not too many, The Stewart boys are in and out like a rotation and Hitchcock, Trengove and Lobbe are like yo yo's so it's a brave man to have selected Moore ;-) - burner09 - 88 months ago|
|• xavjustice, you are the scum of australia. hellopplz, must have been reading xavjustices comment the same time you were. to xavjustice, i use this website among others as a bit of fun and to keep up to date. i have never had an account on any of them, but just signed up to fanfooty right now purely now so that i could write this. its guys like you who really power me off. people don't write stuff on here for idiots like you to harass them. does it make you feel good to write what you just did? not everyone is as good as you twats at fantasy footy games. give people a break for gods sake. surely u have something better to do than call people 'spuds.' if you think you really sound tough using that word, then u are kidding yourself. get a new f u kin word, all you plows are obsessed with it. just concentrate on your one team if you have nothing good to say. hope u have a real nice day, you're a winner mate - harro87 - 88 months ago|
|• Harsh xavjustice. He was named round 1 to cover chaplin i think. With chaplin coming back in, was the only guy not performing well enough to keep a spot. Going to be pretty hard for him to fight for a spot anytime soon from what i've been hearing. Port's defence doing well makes it even harder for him. - Hellopplz - 88 months ago|
|• You should never have picked him u spud. Much better options both forward and back.and you clearly went with him because he's a high draft pick only. You douche - xavjustice - 88 months ago|
|• Does anyone know when Choco will give this lad a run again? - Problems - 88 months ago|
|• I have had him on my bench for Rnd 1 DT. but i just think he'll be more of a downgrade target for someone rather than playing Rnd 1.. we can only hope and watch him play today. - yogibbear - 91 months ago|
|• apparently he'll get chances, i just dont know when - Dedem - 91 months ago|
|• Does anyone know anything about this guy ? Will he play in 2010 ? - wozman - 91 months ago|
|• i think this bloke should be a forward/defender - JesseSmith - 92 months ago|