Off Season Trade Rumours

[Mailman the 2nd]

Thats gonna hurt the dogs

[Justin Bieber]

so offer pick 6 + 7 to the Saints for NAT 1 and go into the draft with PICK 1 AND PICK 4 ;D 8)

Pk 1 won't go w/o pk 4 being involved somehow IMO

nah 6 + 7 is fair imo maybe throw in 2nd rounder if have to

Pick 1 is 10 fold better than  picks 6+7

[Ziplock]

Griffen + 6 for Boyd is overs imo i would of wanted there 2nd rounder at least

I dont want anyone else to know this but i agree with KB.

Dogs needs something else for Griffen and 6 if Griffen is signing for 4 years

I think this is a win for boyd and the giants and a not so much win for the dogs.

I didn't want to see boyd go, and as I said, I'm not a fan of players leaving without completing the contract they were drafted with, but honestly I think this is a best case scenario.

We have what, 4,6 and 7 now? I would love for us to try and package those together for some other player :P

[Bill Manspeaker]

so offer pick 6 + 7 to the Saints for NAT 1 and go into the draft with PICK 1 AND PICK 4 ;D 8)

Pk 1 won't go w/o pk 4 being involved somehow IMO

nah 6 + 7 is fair imo maybe throw in 2nd rounder if have to

nah krk is on it. we won't do the deal unless 4 is involved... as well as 6 & 7 8)

[Jroo]

Well at least one of Griffen or Ward is going to go bananas each week.

Yeah I'd tag Griffen over Ward every day of the week, he should cop the tag most weeks.
Good SC option fort next year.

[Pkbaldy]

Saints would only budge if it was 4, 6 and 7. Just 6 and 7 would be a joke of an attempt.

[Mr.Craig]

GWS falling over themselves to get more first round picks they can waste.

[kilbluff1985]

yeah inb4 GWS draft another tall forward with one of there first 3 picks

[Ricochet]

yeah inb4 GWS draft another tall forward with one of there first 3 picks

inb4 KB says inb4 ;)

Then take a key fwd to replace Boyd

[Ziplock]

GWS falling over themselves to get more first round picks they can waste.

yeah inb4 GWS draft another tall forward with one of there first 3 picks

Not really, I mean we would have gotten Griffen for 'free' next year, but we would have lost Boyd for probably like a second round pick or something.

I'd seriously consider bundling those picks up and going really, really hard at a player over the next couple of days.

Otherwise, yeah, we're probs going to draft another tall forward :P

[kilbluff1985]

btw Zip you think they might try to keep Giles now?

[krk004]

GWS need quality not quantity at this point of their list management.

1 & 22 >> 4,6 & 7

IMO

;)

[Nige]

btw Zip you think they might try to keep Giles now?

Not Zip, but they still have a few tall forwards and they'll probably just pick up another one anyway.

[WCarey18]

Lengths of contracts for Griffen and Boyd were just released.

Boyd on a SEVEN year deal, Griffen got four.

Source: AFL.

[Jroo]

GWS need quality not quantity at this point of their list management.

1 & 22 >> 4,6 & 7

IMO

;)

Would love to see them go after a player.
Pick 7 + Giles for Ryder  ;)
Then send 4 and 6 for 1, that'll get it done.