WXV Round 1

[Levi434]

Serious though, is there a bigger lock than one Isaac Cumming in all formats?

yeah.....Finlayson ;)

You're right

Rio R1 Team:
D: I. Cumming
M: J. Finlayson
R:
F:
I:

[Adamant]

Interested to see who finishes first out of Cumming and Nutting.

[Ricochet]

Interested to see who finishes first out of Cumming and Nutting.

;D

[Toga]

Hang on, when did Beijing have Dangerfield?! That's a bit saddening :'(

Still can't believe that Treloar/Lake special :-\

[Nige]

Previews really taking shape.

[Purple 77]

hahaha, omg

[meow meow]

CHRISTCHURCH SAINTS

B: Heath Shaw, Jarrad McVeigh, Tom Langdon, Nathan Wilson
M: Bryce Gibbs, Marc Murphy, Tom Liberatore, Tom Scully
R: Aaron Sandilands
F: Toby McLean, Daniel Wells, Jarrad Waite, Tory Dickson
I: Gary Ablett jnr (C), Luke Parker (vc)

E: Ryan Griffen, Conor McKenna, Tom Boyd

[Levi434]

@meow You ain't gonna be happy when Griff scores 421 sitting on the pine...

[GoLions]

@meow You ain't gonna be happy when Griff scores 421 sitting on the pine...

I thought he was loopholing with Gaz?

[meow meow]

@meow You ain't gonna be happy when Griff scores 421 sitting on the pine...

Why not? That'll be my 16th best score for the week.

[Levi434]

6. Rolling/Partial Lockout VC Loopholing
A) Continue to Allow
B) Disallow - meaning that only 'reasonable' and AFL selected players can be chosen as a C

A: 6
B: 12

7. Rolling/Partial Lockout Emgerncy Loopholing
A) Continue to Allow
B) Disallow - meaning that only 'reasonable' and AFL selected players can be chosen in the starting XV

A: 8
B: 10

@GL you can't loophole!

No loopholing this year peeps. In true AFL/WXV fashion, one has to wonder how strict the interpretation will be?

Using meow's example. If GAJ isn't named one week will meow be allowed to use him as a loophole? He clearly is a "reasonable" selection?

Maybe we should have another vote as to what the word "reasonable" is defined as?

[iZander]

6. Rolling/Partial Lockout VC Loopholing
A) Continue to Allow
B) Disallow - meaning that only 'reasonable' and AFL selected players can be chosen as a C

A: 6
B: 12

7. Rolling/Partial Lockout Emgerncy Loopholing
A) Continue to Allow
B) Disallow - meaning that only 'reasonable' and AFL selected players can be chosen in the starting XV

A: 8
B: 10

@GL you can't loophole!

No loopholing this year peeps. In true AFL/WXV fashion, one has to wonder how strict the interpretation will be?

Using meow's example. If GAJ isn't named one week will meow be allowed to use him as a loophole? He clearly is a "reasonable" selection?

Maybe we should have another vote as to what the word "reasonable" is defined as?

reasonable means naming players who are playing, GAZ is not a "reasonable" selection if hes not named.......

[Purple 77]

hmm. The term 'reasonable' is actually kinda unnecessary haha, I just added it as a 'catch all' kinda thing, should the need arise.

Which means no Ben jacobs as captain.

[Levi434]

hmm. The term 'reasonable' is actually kinda unnecessary haha, I just added it as a 'catch all' kinda thing, should the need arise.

Which means no Ben jacobs as captain.

How about Shaun Mckernan?

[Purple 77]

hmm. The term 'reasonable' is actually kinda unnecessary haha, I just added it as a 'catch all' kinda thing, should the need arise.

Which means no Ben jacobs as captain.

How about Shaun Mckernan?

Champions league only, and only as required.