EXV: 2017 / 2018 Trade Discussion thread

[LaHug]

Bears give: J Waite
Hulks give: ND #41

Holz knows the risk re Waite, but is prepared for that.

Holz to confirm.

Agreed.

old and injury prone will fit in at Hungary.

I know he's injury prone but holy crap that's a steal

[Holz]

Bears give: J Waite
Hulks give: ND #41

Holz knows the risk re Waite, but is prepared for that.

Holz to confirm.

Agreed.

old and injury prone will fit in at Hungary.

I know he's injury prone but holy crap that's a steal

just for the record.

North have told Waite and Gibson that they will not find out if they are given a contract for next year untill after the trade period. That leads me to believe that North are targeting guys and if they get them then they wont be offered contracts.

Given Waite is 34 if north dont offer him a contract then its likely career over.

thats why he is cheap. Old, Injury Prone and I would say a greater then 50% chance he will be forced into retirment.

[nas]

Bears give: J Waite
Hulks give: ND #41

Holz knows the risk re Waite, but is prepared for that.

Holz to confirm.

Agreed.

old and injury prone will fit in at Hungary.

I know he's injury prone but holy crap that's a steal

just for the record.

North have told Waite and Gibson that they will not find out if they are given a contract for next year untill after the trade period. That leads me to believe that North are targeting guys and if they get them then they wont be offered contracts.

Given Waite is 34 if north dont offer him a contract then its likely career over.

thats why he is cheap. Old, Injury Prone and I would say a greater then 50% chance he will be forced into retirment.

Hence question raised before doing trade & if above does happen.

[JBs-Hawks]

Lol

[Holz]

Lol

lol to what?

[LaHug]

Oh. I didn't even think it was necessarily an unfair trade. Comes down to how you value ND picks. I was just having some discussion. Wouldn't think it'd be bad enough either way for a review.

[Ziplock]

Lol

lol to what?

N41 is a nothing pick essentially.

Surely it has to be at least 10 picks higher than that.

[JBs-Hawks]

Lol

lol to what?

N41 is a nothing pick essentially.

Surely it has to be at least 10 picks higher than that.

[Holz]

Come on thats abit crazy,

im more then happy to pull out of the deal if you guys want to spend pick 30ish on him.

[LaHug]

I'll give away the oldest player on my list for Pick 30!!!

[Rids]

Nat 41 is fine imo. Waite is crap

[Rids]

I should put some context to why he is crap and why people should not rate him so highly.

2016 - 14 games @ 83
2017 - 10 games @ 76

He is 35 now and only 50/50 on getting 1 more year. North wont be that competitive in 2018 so even if he does get a contract what is the best to expect from him? 70 from 10-15 games at best. Good luck to Holz if the guy goes better but no way is he worth anything more than nat 41.

[Ziplock]

I should put some context to why he is crap and why people should not rate him so highly.

2016 - 14 games @ 83
2017 - 10 games @ 76

He is 35 now and only 50/50 on getting 1 more year. North wont be that competitive in 2018 so even if he does get a contract what is the best to expect from him? 70 from 10-15 games at best. Good luck to Holz if the guy goes better but no way is he worth anything more than nat 41.

look I'd see the logic ordinarily, but I personally believe the precedent this season has been to reject the trade of a player of that scoring range for that price.

[Ziplock]

I'll give away the oldest player on my list for Pick 30!!!

Im pretty sure I would as well #stevieJ

I should put some context to why he is crap and why people should not rate him so highly.

2016 - 14 games @ 83
2017 - 10 games @ 76

He is 35 now and only 50/50 on getting 1 more year. North wont be that competitive in 2018 so even if he does get a contract what is the best to expect from him? 70 from 10-15 games at best. Good luck to Holz if the guy goes better but no way is he worth anything more than nat 41.

look I'd see the logic ordinarily, but I personally believe the precedent this season has been to reject the trade of a player of that scoring range for that price.

To clarify though, I'm not overly fussed about it though.

[Holz]

so is anyone calling for it to get negged.

Good guy Holz agreed to give up a pick for a likely retired 35 year old then in comes the heat :P

good to see some chatter.

I would actually prefer to use the pick but i dont mind either way though.