2020 Change in rules to be voted on.

[Ringo]

With the AFL Lists mooted to be 38 plus 4 rookies and 2 Cat B rookies what should our list sizes be.

Open to debate and my opinion is 42 or 43, Some discussion and have a vote on options next week.

Will also need to review number of draft rounds when finalised.

[Ringo]

Further to the above and with 3 periods for clubs to draft undrafted players may need to factor this is in as well as clubs to work the system may not draft full number initially.

So a further discussion also on this maybe clubs can select up to maximinum numbers but may elect to waiver one less subject to a mid season draft based on ladder finishing positions.  Only my suggestion and open to discussion given what the AFL are doing.

[SilverLion]

42 sounds good.

Can always amend later pending what happens with the AFL lists.

[Ringo]

Do we need a vote on list sizes?   We voted to reduce lists to 46 but with the AFL reducing by 2 do we automatically reduce to 44.

Reducing to 44 means a minimum delisting of 4 players to reduce lists to 44 from current lists of 48 players.

Comments.

[GoLions]

I'm happy going lower with 42

[SilverLion]

Since the AFL is cutting it by 2, us doing the same thing down from 46 to 44 makes sense to me.

[Rids]

My 2 cents - no need for a vote. Just keep it consistent with the decision by the AFL and keep the list sizes to 44.