Main Menu

Swans Preseason 2015 thread

Started by stew42, September 27, 2014, 08:31:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mailman the 2nd

Definitely disappointed given all the support the club gave him with his knee reco's to get him where he is today but whatever.

Hope he does well

My Chumps

Absolutely flowering useless management on our behalf. Feeling the sting of paying Buddy/Tip so much already.


The team that beat us by 60 flowering points add an All Australian full back and we lose an All Australian half-back. Now we have to deal with Reece Shaw as the main ball user from half back. flower me.

Bloody hope we sign Patful now.

Ringo

Patful for your Eski compo pick will be fine

SydneyRox

Quote from: Ringo on October 07, 2014, 11:59:59 AM
Patful for your Eski compo pick will be fine

Round 2? Listening to trade radio I am nervous... Hope they put us out of our misery today!

Ringo

This is BS and not a Sydney Fan

AFL ‏@AFL 9m9 minutes ago

The Swans

SydneyRox

BS you think should have been rnd1?

Still happy to give us Patful for pick 40? :P


Ringo

Do SR based on the Frawley Compensation pick and was hoping for a pick in the 20's for Patful.

JBs-Hawks

#112
By the looks of it, to get a rd 1 compo pick you need to have atleast 2m + earning power left.

Ricochet

Malceski deal was 3 years at 500k thats why its 2nd round. Can't really expect more than that given age tbh

Ziplock

Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 07, 2014, 06:35:29 PM
By the looks of it, to get a rd 1 compo pick you need to have atleast 2m + earning power left.
Quote from: Ricochet on October 07, 2014, 06:48:31 PM
Malceski deal was 3 years at 500k thats why its 2nd round. Can't really expect more than that given age tbh

End of round 1 would have been reasonable, it would have been pick (20?) which given eski's ability and age probs would have been right.


then again, Buddy's compo was worse :P



Ricochet

True but its not based on ability ;)

Ziplock

Quote from: Ricochet on October 07, 2014, 07:06:03 PM
True but its not based on ability ;)
500k isn't a small contract.

Also, the ability of a player should be factored in with their age- as in it should take into account how many years they have left rather than how old they are.

Ricochet

Quote from: Ziplock on October 07, 2014, 07:23:24 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on October 07, 2014, 07:06:03 PM
True but its not based on ability ;)
500k isn't a small contract.

Also, the ability of a player should be factored in with their age- as in it should take into account how many years they have left rather than how old they are.
yeh I know and I agree ability should be included. But it isn't unfortunately. Think it was the 3 years and his age that = 2nd round.  compared to Higgins who got 4 years at 400k = 2nd round also, and is younger

Capper

Im surprised we got a R2, thought it might be a R3 for Esky

elephants

Quote from: tabs on October 11, 2014, 04:08:45 PM
Im surprised we got a R2, thought it might be a R3 for Esky

Classic. Bloody AFL love Sydney its ridiculous. Special treatment galore.

:P