next »

[nrich102]

I was the opposite Ringo. I found it to be quite a few.

In the past I would hang onto players who were injured for 5-6ish games. Last year with 30 trades I got rid of them if it was more than 2 weeks. I find it enough to take risks on injury prone players anyway.

But then I may have been lucky and missed out on some injuries that you copped

Yeah, I went far to Conservative

[Memphistopheles]

Guns and Rookies becomes a viable tactic in this.

I always struggled a bit with the limited trades and found myself using them all up before the end of the season and falling away a bit.

My strategy for this year is to be as conservative as possible for the first half of the season.

Which could mean picking less injury-prone players to start with and definitely not more than one on a line.

[salver11]

My rule: DON'T PICK INJURY-PRONE MID-PRICERS.

That doesn't mean don't pick mid-pricers. I'm going for the breakout candidates (Tyson, Watts, Hunter) If any of them get injured, I'm flowered haha

Have to say you have contradicted yourself there. What is Tyson?