AXVs: Official Discussion Thread

Started by Colliwobblers, August 23, 2012, 01:44:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

tor01doc

I'm not wasting my time because my calculator doesn't add up low enough!  :-[


monstrum

1928.39


with Swallow as C and

Ward as VC

not to bad thats with Whitecross injured, and Rhys Stanley on instead of Varcoe...  :-\

monstrum

#693
colli whats the inside word on my man Jarod Witts, will he get a senior gig at all this year?


Colliwobblers

#694
Quote from: monstrum on October 13, 2012, 03:29:27 PM
colli whats the inside word on my man Jarod Witts, will he get a senior gig at all this year?



a few games maybe, and if he goes super well he might secure a spot, but doesn't sound like they plan to use him or gault unless they have to.

the main reason they go the big cue stick was for #2 ruck role/

witts will be a gun ruck tho so i would hold him for sure!! when jolly goes in a season or two witts will be the #1, should be ready by then....

http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/208/default.aspx?newsid=149088

sorry meant to include link when i posted, brief but to the point.....

monstrum

yeah all reports are they won't rush either of their young talls.. 5 players over 200cm i think the Jolly Q-Stick combo (might roll with that ;) hasn't got to many in em u wouldn't think 2 at best...

Justin Bieber

I can't look up how my team goes but I would like to see my 1700-1800 lol

Colliwobblers

mine was about 1955 with Beams C and S Tmompson VC.

but like most teams, there are a number of players in the starting side that i expect to significantly lift their averages in 2013, and more of the same on the bench.

but then i didn't take subbed off games out either just the obvious subbed on games under 20 points...

if i get 2050 i think i will be happy with my relatively young side. the old teams will be hard to beat initially but the gap will close sooner than they think, at worst a star only takes 3 seasons to break out.... often 2!!!!!

KoopKicka

DEF: Bock (84)*, Hibberd (86), Bartram (87), Lake (102)
MID: Pendlebery (143), Ebert (134), Hannebery (104), Masten (113)
RUC: Ryder (116)
FWD: Rioli (116), Blair (105), Dahlhaus (100), Christensen (97)
UTL:  ELlard (112), Picken (101)
= 1876

*= less than 5 games


this is without taking out sub, ceebs.

Look, it not that flash, but I could only see 2 of that 15 not improving next year by 5 points at least. :)

Colliwobblers

serious.....

Bock = 115
Hibberd = 95
Hannebery = 125
masten = who knows  :o
Ryder = 130 ( 2nd Best goal kicking ruck going if the spud can stay fit, i had him all year in SB a must alongside cox for SB IMO )
Your entire FWD line + 10-20 each - a;ll capable of BIG improvement.
Ellard = +20 in a full time role...

picken is a tagger he won't improve and i bet he wont be in your run on side after other youngns in your team break out by round 4 or 5 either :)

So in short, You'll be at least arount the mid to high 1900's pretty good 15, says I .

Quote from: KoopKicka on October 13, 2012, 10:00:23 PM
DEF: Bock (84)*, Hibberd (86), Bartram (87), Lake (102)
MID: Pendlebery (143), Ebert (134), Hannebery (104), Masten (113)
RUC: Ryder (116)
FWD: Rioli (116), Blair (105), Dahlhaus (100), Christensen (97)
UTL:  ELlard (112), Picken (101)
= 1876

*= less than 5 games


this is without taking out sub, ceebs.

Look, it not that flash, but I could only see 2 of that 15 not improving next year by 5 points at least. :)

Maca24

It's good, but I highly doubt Bartram, Masten or Blair will improve.

Adamant

Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 13, 2012, 11:37:24 PM
serious.....

Bock = 115
Hibberd = 95
Hannebery = 125
masten = who knows  :o
Ryder = 130 ( 2nd Best goal kicking ruck going if the spud can stay fit, i had him all year in SB a must alongside cox for SB IMO )
Your entire FWD line + 10-20 each - a;ll capable of BIG improvement.
Ellard = +20 in a full time role...

picken is a tagger he won't improve and i bet he wont be in your run on side after other youngns in your team break out by round 4 or 5 either :)

So in short, You'll be at least arount the mid to high 1900's pretty good 15, says I .

Quote from: KoopKicka on October 13, 2012, 10:00:23 PM
DEF: Bock (84)*, Hibberd (86), Bartram (87), Lake (102)
MID: Pendlebery (143), Ebert (134), Hannebery (104), Masten (113)
RUC: Ryder (116)
FWD: Rioli (116), Blair (105), Dahlhaus (100), Christensen (97)
UTL:  ELlard (112), Picken (101)
= 1876

*= less than 5 games


this is without taking out sub, ceebs.

Look, it not that flash, but I could only see 2 of that 15 not improving next year by 5 points at least. :)

I reckon those predicted averages are spot on, but I reckon Bock will be closer to 100-110ish.

Colliwobblers

yeah he just has them in because they have the highest 2012 average, but you can bet he will have better players not in that 15 scoring higher in 2013.

some of the newbies have to kick on.... we all have some of them, tbag has the rest  ::)  haha

monstrum

#703
Quote from: KoopKicka on October 13, 2012, 10:00:23 PM
DEF: Bock (84)*, Hibberd (86), Bartram (87), Lake (102)
MID: Pendlebery (143), Ebert (134), Hannebery (104), Masten (113)
RUC: Ryder (116)
FWD: Rioli (116), Blair (105), Dahlhaus (100), Christensen (97)
UTL:  ELlard (112), Picken (101)
= 1876


blokes than concern me that might get an injury..  :-\

whos to say Ellard will play a good ammout  of games as well..

picker_man

This has probably been asked before but if i trade back in someone of my initial draft list for a nat draft pick, do i get a list movement back :-\