PROBABLY THE BEST TEAM...comments please

Started by russs13, March 25, 2009, 08:17:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

russs13

back: Goddard, Gilbee, McDonald, Cornes, Lake, s.Hill (Kite, Broadbent)

mid; Abblet, Corey, Selwood, Adcock, Haselby, Rich (swift, dangerfield)

ruck; cox, hille (currie, tippet)

fwd: franklin, pavlich, richardson, higgins, skipworth, yarran, ziebell (gumbleton, nahas)


PLEASE LET ME KNOW WAT YOU THINK, ANY HELP IS GOOD HELP!

JustGonnaDominate

yarran, ziebell, gumbleton and nahas.... seems like ur setting urself up for a fews 0's to me

Al

News flash: your team is not that good. Clearly you know nothing. DONT change your team though, as it is the best, but here are my thoughts:

Lake, kite, broadbent (never heard of him), swift, dangerfield, gumby, nahas, currie and tippett are all overrated or not looking like playing, at least in the early rounds.

1st week you will get 60+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0=60/9 =an average of 6 for all of those players. Well done. Best team I have ever seen.

Adcock should be in the backs and Gilbee is coming off an average year by his standards.

BUT this is THE best team so it would be foolish to change anything.

korza

You sure do need help.

I'm not sure which one to recommend, so i suggest you go and see both.

Dr. Clueless and Prof. Numnut.

Thank you for wasting my time looking at  probably the worst team posted on this site.

DONT TAKE IT PERSONALLY.

Start again, from scratch.

1st pick Cox
2nd Cornes
3rd Higgins
4th Now this maybe hard for you "USE YOUR BRAINS"


verda32