2021 Player X vs. Player Y

Started by SilverLion, December 23, 2020, 12:32:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

jfitty

Ranked 593rd so I’m going to trade hard and make a run.

Need to ditch Danger (already have the usual suspects Titch, Martin, Dunkley), and also have Nik Cox at D5 which is a problem.

Which should I do:

Danger > Ridley
Cox > Logan McDonald, Warner or maybe Fin Macrae if named

OR

Danger > Sidey (POD) and give Cox another week?

Fairly happy with the rest of the team, McNeil at M11 but not concerned.

Bully

Quote from: jfitty on March 23, 2021, 10:47:51 PM
Ranked 593rd so I’m going to trade hard and make a run.

Need to ditch Danger (already have the usual suspects Titch, Martin, Dunkley), and also have Nik Cox at D5 which is a problem.

Which should I do:

Danger > Ridley
Cox > Logan McDonald, Warner or maybe Fin Macrae if named

OR

Danger > Sidey (POD) and give Cox another week?

Fairly happy with the rest of the team, McNeil at M11 but not concerned.

If you have a rookie at D5 I'd get a premo in quick smart. Watched Ridley and he looked sharp, long penetrating kicking. The only concern would be future lock down roles, not sure how the Bombers plan on using him.

jfitty

Quote from: Bully on March 23, 2021, 11:00:27 PM
Quote from: jfitty on March 23, 2021, 10:47:51 PM
Ranked 593rd so I’m going to trade hard and make a run.

Need to ditch Danger (already have the usual suspects Titch, Martin, Dunkley), and also have Nik Cox at D5 which is a problem.

Which should I do:

Danger > Ridley
Cox > Logan McDonald, Warner or maybe Fin Macrae if named

OR

Danger > Sidey (POD) and give Cox another week?

Fairly happy with the rest of the team, McNeil at M11 but not concerned.

If you have a rookie at D5 I'd get a premo in quick smart. Watched Ridley and he looked sharp, long penetrating kicking. The only concern would be future lock down roles, not sure how the Bombers plan on using him.

Cheers Bully, that definitely seems the plan.

Have Lloyd, Laird, Stewart and Daniel already, so think Ridley would be the next best

billnats

Martin & Fantasia
Or
Taranto & Stephenson

Bully


Hazza09

Bailey Smith v McGrath v Taranto?

Not sure if any of these guys will be Top 8-10 mids by this years end.


Bully

Quote from: Hazza09 on March 24, 2021, 11:44:40 AM
Bailey Smith v McGrath v Taranto?

Not sure if any of these guys will be Top 8-10 mids by this years end.

Personally feel McGrath has the highest upside but Taranto comes in 60k cheaper so there's that to consider. Smith is spending more time in the back half which may affect his consistency, he's a jet but probably not the best pick in a team laden with fantasy stars.

Can you afford Zorko? He is 50/50 to be a top 6 forward so worth a punt.

whynot102

Dusty or Zorko and Heppell or Stephenson and McGrath

Bully

Quote from: whynot102 on March 24, 2021, 09:14:38 PM
Dusty or Zorko and Heppell or Stephenson and McGrath

Dusty & Heppell.

I just think the odds of nailing two breakouts is pretty remote. There's certainly merit in both selections but you would be exposing yourself to a fair degree of risk.

whynot102

Dusty Heppell vs Dunkley Rowe

jfitty

Quote from: whynot102 on March 25, 2021, 07:12:34 PM
Dusty Heppell vs Dunkley Rowe

Dusty Heppell for mine.

How about Ridley vs Sidebottom for Danger?

whynot102

Ridley
Quote from: jfitty on March 25, 2021, 07:21:16 PM
Quote from: whynot102 on March 25, 2021, 07:12:34 PM
Dusty Heppell vs Dunkley Rowe

Dusty Heppell for mine.

How about Ridley vs Sidebottom for Danger?

Hazza09

Ridley & Dunkley vs Dunkley B Smith

Wanderer

Quote from: Hazza09 on March 26, 2021, 11:31:49 AM
Ridley & Dunkley vs Dunkley B Smith

Ridley and Dunkley easily and it's not even close.

jfitty

Need to pick two to start:

Nik Cox vs Scott vs Harry Jones vs Bergman

Thinking the last two?