WXV Ladder Positions 2018

[Purple 77]

After Round 12

Berlin drop down to 4th  :( Pacific shoot back up to 5th, whilst 9th placed New York build a 2 game lead over 10th placed Tokyo. I think we can now say there is only 9 teams now fighting for 8 spots.

Position	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Toronto Wolves	1787	1599	10	2	111.76
2	Beijing Thunder	1675	1536	10	2	109.05
3	Christchurch Saints	1671	1546	10	2	108.09
4	Berlin Brewers	1717	1574	9	3	109.09
5	Pacific Islanders	1781	1608	8	4	110.76
6	Seoul Magpies	1736	1638	8	4	105.98
7	New Delhi Tigers	1735	1651	8	4	105.09
8	Dublin Destroyers	1694	1620	7	5	104.57
9	New York Revolution	1648	1620	7	5	101.73
10	Tokyo Samurai	1564	1589	5	7	98.43
11	Buenos Aires Armadillos	1442	1540	5	7	93.64
12	Rio de Janeiro Jaguars	1512	1649	4	8	91.69
13	Moscow Spetsnaz	1611	1700	3	9	94.76
14	Cairo Sands	1567	1686	3	9	92.94
15	Mexico City Suns	1456	1575	3	9	92.44
16	London Royals	1411	1584	3	9	89.08
17	PNL Reindeers	1416	1605	3	9	88.22
18	Cape Town Cobras	1524	1627	2	10	93.67

EurAsia	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Beijing Thunder	855	791	5	1	108.09
2	Berlin Brewers	852	814	4	2	104.67
3	Dublin Destroyers	582	532	3	1	109.4
4	Tokyo Samurai	668	643	3	2	103.89
5	New Delhi Tigers	708	705	3	2	100.43
6	Seoul Magpies	703	699	2	3	100.57
7	PNL Reindeers	609	679	2	3	89.69
8	London Royals	342	376	0	3	90.96
9	Moscow Spetsnaz	645	725	0	5	88.97

AAP Alliance	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Christchurch Saints	683	615	5	0	111.06
2	Pacific Islanders	639	509	4	0	125.54
3	Toronto Wolves	613	544	3	1	112.68
4	New York Revolution	545	534	2	2	102.06
5	Cairo Sands	530	525	2	2	100.95
6	Cape Town Cobras	753	775	2	4	97.16
7	Mexico City Suns	755	802	2	4	94.14
8	Buenos Aires Armadillos	713	822	2	4	86.74
9	Rio de Janeiro Jaguars	624	729	0	5	85.6

Europe	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Dublin Destroyers	299	232	2	0	128.88
2	Berlin Brewers	284	255	2	0	111.37
3	PNL Reindeers	218	256	1	1	85.16
4	London Royals	219	240	0	2	91.25
5	Moscow Spetsnaz	251	288	0	2	87.15

America	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Toronto Wolves	303	258	2	0	117.44
2	New York Revolution	268	258	1	1	103.88
3	Buenos Aires Armadillos	259	264	1	1	98.11
4	Mexico City Suns	380	408	1	2	93.14
5	Rio de Janeiro Jaguars	124	146	0	1	84.93

Asia	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Beijing Thunder	416	402	2	1	103.48
2	Tokyo Samurai	258	256	1	1	100.78
3	New Delhi Tigers	136	135	1	0	100.74
4	Seoul Magpies	269	286	0	2	94.06

Africonia	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Christchurch Saints	133	126	1	0	105.56
2	Cape Town Cobras	255	253	1	1	100.79
3	Cairo Sands	120	129	0	1	93.02
4	Pacific Islanders	0	0	0	0	0

Reserves

This is the ladder that just never changes. Although, I find Port Morseby's position quite amusing... look at how many points they've scored compared to those around them! WTF!

Position	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Washington Rebellion	1082	816	11	1	132.6
2	La Plata Armada	1520	860	10	2	176.74
3	Windsor Warriors	1647	1016	10	2	162.11
4	Copacabana Capuchins	1351	895	10	2	150.95
5	Yuzawa Yakuza	1634	1092	10	2	149.63
6	Pyongyang Chollimas	1902	922	9	3	206.29
7	Imperial Princes	1161	933	7	5	124.44
8	Siberian Wolverines	1412	1140	6	6	123.86
9	Guadalajara Wolves	689	927	6	6	74.33
10	Alexandria Hieroglyphics	811	1149	6	6	70.58
11	Mumbai Elephants	803	1001	4	8	80.22
12	Durban Pirates	770	1052	4	8	73.19
13	Shanghai Storm	730	1146	3	9	63.7
14	Rhineland Rum-Runners	533	949	3	9	56.16
15	Wellington Weta	615	1124	3	9	54.72
16	Marseille Kings	345	1098	3	9	31.42
17	Port Morseby Iguanadons	1067	1277	2	10	83.56
18	Belfast Braves	251	926	1	11	27.11

[RaisyDaisy]

Our last 3 games are brutal so we'll likely finish 9th this year, much better than what most would have predicted

Our list is younger, and you know we'll be productive in the off season, and back in the finals next year

For now though, we cheer the Rebellion to win a flag!  8)

[Adamant]

@Purple77, has a team ever gone through the entire H&A season on top of the ladder AND hasn't dipped below 140 WXV points in the process? I'm probably going to put the mockers on us now but with 5 rounds to go, we might be the first.

[meow meow]

Pacific, Beijing and Toronto in our next 3. Yikes! NDT in the final round too. Might scrape into the 8.

[Nige]

Bottom 6 battle is fascinating.

[Purple 77]

@Purple77, has a team ever gone through the entire H&A season on top of the ladder AND hasn't dipped below 140 WXV points in the process? I'm probably going to put the mockers on us now but with 5 rounds to go, we might be the first.

No team has ever gone through the whole season without dipping below 140 (I think... certainly not from 2015 onwards).

No team has ever gone through the whole season number 1 on the ladder either... I'm pretty sure.

I refer back to Dublin in 2015, as I think that's probably the greatest ever WXV team (in a H&A season at least).

Dublin in 2015 went 140+ for 16 out 17 rounds, and was number 1 from Round 3, all the way until they lost the grand final.

I don't think we'll ever see a better H&A season than Dublin in 2015. 16-1, with an average of 163ppg.

[Purple 77]

After Round 13

Pacific take Berlin's spot in the 4, New Delhi creep up to 6th, New York now a game behind 8th, but maintain a 2 game advantage over 10th despite losing, whilst Rio slip to 15th after the previous week's 13th-16th placed sides all got a win!

Position	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Toronto Wolves	1935	1732	11	2	111.72
2	Beijing Thunder	1821	1665	11	2	109.37
3	Christchurch Saints	1815	1705	10	3	106.45
4	Pacific Islanders	1940	1752	9	4	110.73
5	Berlin Brewers	1862	1723	9	4	108.07
6	New Delhi Tigers	1876	1791	9	4	104.75
7	Seoul Magpies	1876	1779	8	5	105.45
8	Dublin Destroyers	1843	1765	8	5	104.42
9	New York Revolution	1781	1762	7	6	101.08
10	Tokyo Samurai	1689	1726	5	8	97.86
11	Buenos Aires Armadillos	1574	1676	5	8	93.91
12	Moscow Spetsnaz	1747	1832	4	9	95.36
13	Cairo Sands	1709	1819	4	9	93.95
14	Mexico City Suns	1565	1683	4	9	92.99
15	Rio de Janeiro Jaguars	1620	1758	4	9	92.15
16	London Royals	1548	1709	4	9	90.58
17	PNL Reindeers	1545	1751	3	10	88.24
18	Cape Town Cobras	1657	1775	2	11	93.35

EurAsia	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Beijing Thunder	1001	920	6	1	108.8
2	Dublin Destroyers	731	677	4	1	107.98
3	Berlin Brewers	997	963	4	3	103.53
4	New Delhi Tigers	849	845	4	2	100.47
5	Tokyo Samurai	793	780	3	3	101.67
6	Seoul Magpies	843	840	2	4	100.36
7	PNL Reindeers	738	825	2	4	89.45
8	London Royals	479	501	1	3	95.61
9	Moscow Spetsnaz	645	725	0	5	88.97

AAP Alliance	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Pacific Islanders	798	653	5	0	122.21
2	Christchurch Saints	827	774	5	1	106.85
3	Toronto Wolves	761	677	4	1	112.41
4	Cairo Sands	672	658	3	2	102.13
5	Mexico City Suns	864	910	3	4	94.95
6	New York Revolution	678	676	2	3	100.3
7	Cape Town Cobras	886	923	2	5	95.99
8	Buenos Aires Armadillos	713	822	2	4	86.74
9	Rio de Janeiro Jaguars	732	838	0	6	87.35

Europe	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Dublin Destroyers	448	377	3	0	118.83
2	Berlin Brewers	429	404	2	1	106.19
3	PNL Reindeers	218	256	1	1	85.16
4	London Royals	219	240	0	2	91.25
5	Moscow Spetsnaz	251	288	0	2	87.15

America	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Toronto Wolves	303	258	2	0	117.44
2	Mexico City Suns	489	516	2	2	94.77
3	New York Revolution	268	258	1	1	103.88
4	Buenos Aires Armadillos	259	264	1	1	98.11
5	Rio de Janeiro Jaguars	232	255	0	2	90.98

Asia	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Beijing Thunder	416	402	2	1	103.48
2	New Delhi Tigers	277	275	2	0	100.73
3	Tokyo Samurai	258	256	1	1	100.78
4	Seoul Magpies	409	427	0	3	95.78

Africonia	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	Pacific Islanders	159	144	1	0	110.42
2	Cape Town Cobras	255	253	1	1	100.79
3	Christchurch Saints	277	285	1	1	97.19
4	Cairo Sands	120	129	0	1	93.02

Reserves

Rebellion go from 1st to 5th  :o

Position	Name	Score	Scored Against	Wins	Losses	Percentage
1	La Plata Armada	1649	969	11	2	170.18
2	Windsor Warriors	1763	1062	11	2	166.01
3	Copacabana Capuchins	1467	941	11	2	155.9
4	Yuzawa Yakuza	1730	1151	11	2	150.3
5	Washington Rebellion	1112	928	11	2	119.83
6	Pyongyang Chollimas	2037	1018	10	3	200.1
7	Imperial Princes	1220	1029	7	6	118.56
8	Alexandria Hieroglyphics	923	1179	7	6	78.29
9	Siberian Wolverines	1521	1269	6	7	119.86
10	Guadalajara Wolves	735	1043	6	7	70.47
11	Mumbai Elephants	899	1136	4	9	79.14
12	Durban Pirates	816	1168	4	9	69.86
13	Shanghai Storm	816	1184	4	9	68.92
14	Rhineland Rum-Runners	598	985	4	9	60.71
15	Port Morseby Iguanadons	1193	1313	3	10	90.86
16	Wellington Weta	651	1250	3	10	52.08
17	Marseille Kings	383	1184	3	10	32.35
18	Belfast Braves	287	991	1	12	28.96

[upthemaidens]

Seniors 1st and Reserves 8th in scoring.   The season is going along quite nicely, decent depth can be called on if needed.

[Jukes]

10th spot definitely the goal for us from here. We’re clearly not at the level (with the personnel available!) of the top half of the comp but I think it’s fair to say we’re the best of the rest.

[RaisyDaisy]

10th spot definitely the goal for us from here. We’re clearly not at the level (with the personnel available!) of the top half of the comp but I think it’s fair to say we’re the best of the rest.

10th would suggest second best, which would be right ;)

[meow meow]

10th spot definitely the goal for us from here. We’re clearly not at the level (with the personnel available!) of the top half of the comp but I think it’s fair to say we’re the best of the rest.

10th would suggest second best, which would be right ;)

Half of 18 is 9 pal.

[Torpedo10]

10th spot definitely the goal for us from here. We’re clearly not at the level (with the personnel available!) of the top half of the comp but I think it’s fair to say we’re the best of the rest.

10th would suggest second best, which would be right ;)

Top 8 is a dated enterprise. Bring in the Top 9.  ;)

[Holz]

10th spot definitely the goal for us from here. We’re clearly not at the level (with the personnel available!) of the top half of the comp but I think it’s fair to say we’re the best of the rest.

10th would suggest second best, which would be right ;)

Top 8 is a dated enterprise. Bring in the Top 9.  ;)

8 its good, i like it that you have to be better then average to make finals.

i dont like it that in the NBA they have 16 playoff spots but 30 teams it means you can be below average and still make finals.

[RaisyDaisy]

10th spot definitely the goal for us from here. We’re clearly not at the level (with the personnel available!) of the top half of the comp but I think it’s fair to say we’re the best of the rest.

10th would suggest second best, which would be right ;)

Half of 18 is 9 pal.

What are you on about?

He said he wanted to finish 10th but then also said they are best of the second half. Half would be 9 teams, and I said 10th would be right because that would in fact not make them the best of the half as we are 9th and best of that half

[Holz]

10th spot definitely the goal for us from here. We’re clearly not at the level (with the personnel available!) of the top half of the comp but I think it’s fair to say we’re the best of the rest.

10th would suggest second best, which would be right ;)

Half of 18 is 9 pal.

What are you on about?

He said he wanted to finish 10th but then also said they are best of the second half. Half would be 9 teams, and I said 10th would be right because that would in fact not make them the best of the half as we are 9th and best of that half

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

10th is best of the second half.