Player X vs. Player Y

[Hazza09]

Yeo / Coffield / Banfield / Fogarty

vs

Savage / Mirra / Constable / Bell or Taberner or Dunkley

:-\

[YoungGun]

Reaching out with a tricky one;

Current situation; Coffield D3, Keefe D8, Walters F4, Giles-Langdon F6

Walters + Giles Langdon (F4/6) vs Angus Brayshaw + Bundy (D3/F4) ...... which would move Keeffe to F8 and field Venables or Ryan until first upgrade is a back rookie to F4 with Keeffe swing back

Feel in this situation you're going too deep in the mids, which is sacrificing a lot on your other lines.

Would downgrade a mid and aim for Christensen at F4, and a DEF prem at D3.

You could be right, but the sacrifice could also be very beneficial if it plays out how I would like it to. In my example Bundy is at F4 just confirming.

If you had to choose what would you do? I went with Brayshaw and Bundy - evens out better imo and have 3 very good prems ahead of Bundy to keep me content.

[SilverLion]

Yeo / Coffield / Banfield / Fogarty

vs

Savage / Mirra / Constable / Bell or Taberner or Dunkley Christensen/Stephenson

:-\

Tough one, gotta mix and match imo

Reaching out with a tricky one;

Current situation; Coffield D3, Keefe D8, Walters F4, Giles-Langdon F6

Walters + Giles Langdon (F4/6) vs Angus Brayshaw + Bundy (D3/F4) ...... which would move Keeffe to F8 and field Venables or Ryan until first upgrade is a back rookie to F4 with Keeffe swing back

Feel in this situation you're going too deep in the mids, which is sacrificing a lot on your other lines.

Would downgrade a mid and aim for Christensen at F4, and a DEF prem at D3.

You could be right, but the sacrifice could also be very beneficial if it plays out how I would like it to.

If you had to choose what would you do? I went with Brayshaw and Bundy - evens out better imo and have 3 very good prems ahead of Bundy to keep me content.

If forced to, probably Brayshaw + Bundy, but I'd have Giles-Langdon ahead of Venables.

[YoungGun]

Yeo / Coffield / Banfield / Fogarty

vs

Savage / Mirra / Constable / Bell or Taberner or Dunkley Christensen/Stephenson

:-\

Tough one, gotta mix and match imo

Reaching out with a tricky one;

Current situation; Coffield D3, Keefe D8, Walters F4, Giles-Langdon F6

Walters + Giles Langdon (F4/6) vs Angus Brayshaw + Bundy (D3/F4) ...... which would move Keeffe to F8 and field Venables or Ryan until first upgrade is a back rookie to F4 with Keeffe swing back

Feel in this situation you're going too deep in the mids, which is sacrificing a lot on your other lines.

Would downgrade a mid and aim for Christensen at F4, and a DEF prem at D3.

You could be right, but the sacrifice could also be very beneficial if it plays out how I would like it to.

If you had to choose what would you do? I went with Brayshaw and Bundy - evens out better imo and have 3 very good prems ahead of Bundy to keep me content.

If forced to, probably Brayshaw + Bundy, but I'd have Giles-Langdon ahead of Venables.

Cheers, very sound thinking. Just worried Giles-Langdon will get pushed out of the team and having Venables/Ryan should guarantee always at least 1 playing

[SilverLion]

Cheers, very sound thinking. Just worried Giles-Langdon will get pushed out of the team and having Venables/Ryan should guarantee always at least 1 playing

I reckon ZGL takes Stevie J's spot ;). But can see your reasoning.

[korodos]

Heath Shaw + Bundy vs Buddy/Heeney/Hibberd + Coffield

[YoungGun]

Cheers, very sound thinking. Just worried Giles-Langdon will get pushed out of the team and having Venables/Ryan should guarantee always at least 1 playing

I reckon ZGL takes Stevie J's spot ;). But can see your reasoning.

we'll see if I have the balls closer to lockout

[AN1611]

Oliver vs J.kelly (gws)?

[Ringo]

Kelly definitely over Oliver who maybe carrying an injury,

[Koop]

Danger + Holman

Or

Dusty/any other mid + Dow?

[ubeaut]

Danger + Holman

Or

Dusty/any other mid + Dow?

Danger and Holman. OR
Dusty and Brayshaw/Brodie not Dow who didn't impress in JLT

[MC]

Surely you can't start Danger at 750k with so many question marks...

- Does his injury affect his output?
- Does Ablett take away points?
- Does Selwood switch back on?
- Does he just start slow and lose a ton of cash?

No chance for me.

[js19]

Hibberd, Walters, Libba, Armo

Vs

Josh Kelly, Zerrett, Sicily, Doedee on field

[ubeaut]

Surely you can't start Danger at 750k with so many question marks...

- Does his injury affect his output?
- Does Ablett take away points?
- Does Selwood switch back on?
- Does he just start slow and lose a ton of cash?

No chance for me.

Are u trying to turn as many away from him as u can so he is more a POD?lol
If he's injured he won't play. If he plays he's over the injury and 100% right to go. Why risk your best player in round one?
Selwood isn't really the issue either.
The issue is GAJ and how the Cats will  play him and Paddy. I'm still on the fence and wish he was injured for a 2-4 week period cos his price just compromises rest of team.
The big worry leaving him out is he goes bang, you can't make up the lost points elsewhere,down the rankings u go and he is pain in the rear to get in with 3 trades minimum.

[Woppa15]

Sicily D3/And. Brayshaw M6/Lobb F4/BundyF5
VS
Simpson D3/Coniglio M6/Bundy F4