TRADES LODGED - Trade Period 1
Trades in black have been confirmed but not approved
Trades in Green have been approved
Trades in Red have not been approved.
Trades involving Swansea Breakers will be run through Trade committee prior to approval for transparency.
Trade 1
Birmingham Bombers give - Westhoff + Lycett
Blackpool Bunnies give Bellchambers + 2nd Round Pick 26
Trade approved
Trade 2
Huddersfield Hawks give Zaharakis+Pick 47
Birmingham Bombers give Rioli+ B. Reid
Trade approved
Trade 3
Winchester Werewolves give Round 1 Pick 18
Birmingham Bombers give Dean Coxo
Trade approved
Trade 4
Huddersfield Hawks give: Picks 11 and 29
Liverpool Lobsters give: Clancee Pearce and Jordan Kelly5
Trade Approved
Trade 5
Nottingham Hoods give : Gary Ablett, David Mackay, Draft pick 31, Draft pick 49
Winchester Werewolves give: Robbie Gray, Jesse Lonergan, Jackson Macrae, Seb Ross
Trade Rejected
Revised trade received
Nottingham Hoods give : G.Ablett, pick 31, pick 49, pick 67
Winchester Werewolves give : R.Gray, J.Lonergan, J.Macrae, S.Ross
Revised trade approved
Trade 6
Nottingham Hoods give: Round 1 pick 13
Hastings Hurricanes give : Sam Day
Trade Approved
Trade 7
Manchester Magic gives Aaron Black & Dylan Shiel
Liverpool Lobsters gives: Marley Williams & Shaun Grigg
Trade Approved
Trade 8
Hebden Bridge Hedgehogs give: Matthew Lobbe + Heath Shaw+ 2nd round pick 35
Swansea Breakers give: Nic Nat + Matthew DeBoer + 5th round pick 87
Trade approved after reference to Trade Committee
Trade 9
Swansea Breakers give: Troy Chaplin
Liverpool Lobsters give: Jarrod Witts
Trade approved after reference to Trade Committee
Trade 10
Birmingham Bombers Give: Nat Pick #16 + Nat Pick #34 + Nat Pick #70 + Nat Pick #88 + Nat Pick #106
Winchester Werewolves Give: Mitch Clisby + Nat Pick #49 + Nat Pick #54 + Nat Pick #67 + Nat Pick #72
Trade approved All adjustments to picks even trade out although doubtful if picks 88 and 106 will be used by Werewolves
Trade 11
Hurricanes give: Arryn Siposs
Hawks give: Sam Blease
Trade Approved
Trade 12
Lobsters give: Pick 29 (on-trading)
Badgers give: Dennis Armfield
Trade Approved
Trade 13
Huddersfield give: Mitch Robinson + Daniel Gorringe
Crosby give: Steve Johnson + Nat 81
Trade approved
Trade 14
Cruisers give: NAT #9
Owls give: Mike Pyke
Trade Approved
Trade 15
Hastings Hurricanes give: Tom Mitchell + NAT #30.
Oxford Owls give: Robert Murphy + James Kelly.
Trade approved after careful consideration
Trade 16
Lobsters give: Aaron Black + Pick 11
Owls give: Sharrod Wellingham + Pick 9
Not approved trade withdrawn by mutual consent
Trade 17
Owls give: Nick Dal Santo and Greg Broughton
Badgers give: Sam Mayes and pick 29
Trade approved
Trade 18
Badgers give: Jared Petrenko and Ben McGlynn
Hurricane give: Sam Butler and pick 84
Trade approved
Trade 19
Lobsters give: Jordan Schroder + Pick 37
Swaggers give: Simon Black + Tom Hickey
Trade Approved
Trade 20
Bombers give: Daniel Wells
Hurricances give: NAT 13
Trade Approved after much consideration and limitations with trading rules.
Trade 21
Lobsters give: Sam Naismith and Dan Nicholson
Steins give: Hayden Crozier and Luke Delaney
Trade approved
Trade 22
Lobsters give: Pick 55
Badgers give: Nick Duigan
Trade approved
This is additional player movement for Lobsters as per rule
Trade 23
Bombers give: Pick 49
Lobsters give: Alex Browne
Trade Approved
Trade 24
Staines Steins give Matt Suckling
Birmingham give Hamish Hartlett
Trade Approved
Trade 25
Owls give Gary Rohan
Bombers give Michael Talia
Trade Approved
Trade 26
Nottingham Hoods give Sean Dempster
Oxford Owls give Pick 43
Trade Approved
Trade 27
Liverpool Lobsters give: Tom Hickey
Winchester Werewolves: Tom Curren
Trade approved
This is additional player movement for Lobsters as per rule
Trade 28
Hastings trade: Andrew Gaff and Blayne Wilson
Swindon trade: Shane Mumford and NAT Pick 92
Trade Approved
Trade 29
Bradford Badgers give Jack Fitzpatrick + pick 14
Blackpool Bunnies give Chris Mayne + pick 44
Trade approved
Trade 30
Hoods give Pick 43 Nat Draft, Pick 13 Rookie Draft
Blackpool Bunnies Give Elliott Kavanagh, Pick 62 Nat Draft
Trade Approved Picks even trade out
Trade 31
Owls give: Pick 29 + Pick 79
Badgers give: Pick 32 + Pick 44
After discussion with both parties this amended trade has been approved
Owls give: Pick 29 + Pick 61
Badgers give: Pick 32 + Pick 44
Trade 32
Bombers give Mackie+Vince+NAT 72
Badgers give Andrew Swallow+NAT 50+Rookie 14
Trade approved
Trade 33
Huddersfield give: Josh P Kennedy + Dane Rampe
Blackpool give: Dane Beams + Nd #98
Trade Approved
Trade 34
Hoods give.. David Mackay
Leeches give .. Luke McGuane
Trade approved
Trade 35
Breakers Give: Garlett + Pick 69
Owls Give: Membrey + Pick 32
Trade approved endorsed by trades committee
Trade 36
Bombers Give Pick 13
Magic give Aaron Hall
Trade approved Pick 13 for a player averaging 79 (90 in his last 4 games) is fair as well
Trade 37
Huddersfield give: Lewis Jetta + Jarryd Cachia
Staines give: Nick Riewoldt + Luke Mcpharlin
Trade approved after some deliberation
Trade 38
Hoods give: Jackson Trengove, Zac Dawson
Hurricanes give: Liam Sumner, NAT 66
Trade Approved
Trade 39
Oxford give: Travis Cloke + Brett Goodes + Lewis Johnston + NAT #9 + NAT #44
Liverpool give: Aaron Black + Dylan Shiel + Mitch Duncan + NAT #11 + Troy Chaplin
Trade approved and well done on this trade
Trade 40
Werewolves give Chris Dawes
Bombers give NAT pick 26
Trade approved
Trade 41
Bombers give NAT Pick 18 + Dom Tyson
Leeches give NAT Pick 5 + NAT Pick 23
Trade approved
Trade 42
Swindon trade: Jed Lamb and Pick 56
Birmingham trade: Picks 23 and 67
Trade approved
Trade 43
Steins give: Judd + NAT 42 + ROOK 42
Badgers give : Mzungu + NAT 29 + ROOK 32
Trade approved
Trade 44
Magic Gives: Waters+Darling+NAT 21
Badgers Give: Vince+Brodie Smith+55
Trade Approved
Trade 45
Breakers give: Sam Docherty
Owls give: Pick 11
Trade approved
Trade 46
Bunnies give: Zac Tuohy
Owls give: NAT Pick #30
Trade Approved
Trade 47
Owls give: Tom Mitchell + NAT 25
Bombers give: Andrew Swallow + NAT 47
Trade approved after much deliberation. Mainly due to the fact that Swallow will miss a fair bit of next season.
Trade 48
Leeds Leeches give: Jarrad Waite + Jonathon Simpkin
Crosby Cruisers give: Sam Gilbert + Sam Kerridge
Trade approved
Trade 49
Newcastle Falcons give: Lindsay Thomas and Jackson Paine
Liverpool Lobsters give: Brent Reilly and ND Pick 49
Trade approved
Trade 50
Crosby Cruisers give: M Boyd + J Adcock + H Scotland
Newcastle Falcons give: J Martin + D Smith + Pick 46 Nat
Trade Approved
Trade 51
Crosby gives: Jarrad McVeigh+NAT 46
Hebden Bridge gives: Nathan Jones + Curtly Hampton
Trade Approved
Trade 52
Bombers give NAT 5 + Rookie 34
Owls give NAT 7 + Rookie 7
Trade Approved
TRADE PERIOD 2
Trade 53
Falcons give: A Christenson + N Suban
Cruisers give: M Pavlich + K Simpson
Trade approved
Trade 54
Liverpool give: Luke Delaney and Jackson Paine
Crosby give: Dan Currie and Jonathan Simpkin
Trade approved
Trade 55
Falcons give: Joel Selwood
Breakers Give: Dane Swan
Trade approved as trades committee has given approval
Trade 56
Falcons give: S Burgoyne
Birmingham give: C Dawes.
Trade approved after receiving further information
Trade 57
Breakers Give: Steele Sidebottom and Nathan Wright
Hawks Give: Cyril Rioli and Koby Stevens
Trade approved - Trades committee have no objections
Trade 58
Hoods give .. Luke Hodge
Falcons Give ... Dan Hannebery
Trade Approved
Trade 59
Werewolves give: Bryce Gibbs
Falcons give: Jimmy Bartel
Trade approved
Trade 60
Swaggers give: Tom Rockliff and Jordan Roughead
Bombers give: Marc Murphy and Jordan Lewis
Extra Trade Movements for Swaggers so no additional movements for Bombers.
Trade Approved - Although trade is uneven it strengthens the Swaggers list so on that basis it is approved. Strengthening lower placed teams
Trade 61
Crosby gives: Jackson Paine
Leeds: give: Sam Reid
Trade cancelled
Trade 62
Rams give: Jonathan Simpkin
Hawks give: Josh Gibson
Trade Cancelled
Trade 63
Steins give: Ryan Okeefe + Beau Maister
Hawks give: James Frawley + Lachie Hunter
Trade Cancelled
Trade 64
Steins give: Jason Johannisen
Rams give: Nathan Hrovat
Trade Cancelled
Trade 65
Steins give: Tim Mohr.
Liverpool give: Jake Spencer.
Trade Cancelled
Trade 66
Werewolves give: Ben Cunnington
Bunnies give: Luke Dahlhaus
Trade Cancelled
Trade 67
Werewolves give: Ben Cunnington
Bunnies give: Luke Dahlhaus
Trade Approved
Trade 68
Nottingham Hoods give : Jesse Lonergan
Bradford Badgers give : Jesse White
Trade Approved
Trade 69
Crosby gives: Paul Seedsman
Oxford gives: Dylan Shiel.
Trade Approved
Trade 70
Badgers give: Scott McMahon
Hoods give: Clint Jones
Trade Approved
Trade 71
Steins give: Hartlett+ M Brown (Eagles)+Crisp
Birmingham: Perris+Lester+Michie.
Steins are using up 2 of the extra/new coach list movements to do this one
Trade Approved
Trade 72
Steins give: Ryan O'Keefe
Huddersfield gives: Lachie Hunter
Steins using final additional movement as well in this trade.
Trade Approved - Final Year Player? verses 8/10 year player
Trade 73
Rams give: Jonathan Simpkin
Hawks give: Josh Gibson.
Trade Approved
Trade 74
Werewolves give Majak Daw
Owls give Trop Chaplin
Trade Approved Additional movement for Werewolves
Trade 75
Rams give: Jake Spencer
Steins give: Tim Mohr
Trade Approved Compensation trade to Steins finishing 13th
Trade 76
Nottingham Hoods give: Courtney Dempsey
Birmingham Dragons give: Dom Sheed
Trade Approved
Trade 77
Grope Lane give: Elliot Yeo + Alexis Georgiou
Steins give: Jason Johannisen + Louis Hebert.
Trade Approved
Trade 78
Crosby trade: Mark Jamar
Staines trade: Nathan Bock
Trade Approved
List Movements remaining excludes trades not approved
Birmingham Dragons 1
Blackpool Bunnies 4
Bradford Badgers 0
Crosby Cruisers 0
Grope Lane Giants 9
Hastings Hurricanes 3
Hebden Bridge Hedgehogs 6
Huddersfield Hawks 0
Leeds Leeches 7
Liverpool Rams 0
Manchester Magic 5
Newcastle Falcons 0
Nottingham Hoods 4
Oxford Owls 0
Staines Steins 0 All extra movements now used
Swansea Breakers 2
Swindon Swaggers 4
Winchester Werewolves 4
So Birmingham have finished trading already. 5 movements, done.
Berminham gives:
Westhoff, Lycett, Rioli, B Reid and Dean Cox for Bellchambers, Zaharakis, Pick 17or18, 26, 47
:/ Gotta say KB, reckon I could have offered more for some players. But I was waiting until the trading began - no idea on what the rush is.
I have a clear direction on where I'm taking the team simple as that really
I wanted a younger ruck so I could Trade Cox for a pick done both
I wanted another Captain option got one in Zaharakis annoying relying on Murphy and Lewis
Have also done a trade with one of my older players for another round one pick but have to do it next trade period and maybe get a defender for Hartlett who will be a mid only
I find it easier to get in early trading before teams run out of movements I am happy I have done what I planned to do
I do have a strategy not like I'm just going nuts
And most of your players would be to old for me Ossie
Would have at least given you more for Cox, your loss I suppose, not sure on the rush is all kb. Westhoff and rioli both young forwards that you could have got more for also imo
Yeah I agree with Ossie.
Zaha isn't in my top 5 players. Nor is Lewis and Murphy.
Quote from: whatlez on August 30, 2013, 12:19:03 PM
Yeah I agree with Ossie.
Zaha isn't in my top 5 players. Nor is Lewis and Murphy.
what is your point? you have Barlow, Cotchin, Griffin, Swallow I have Murphy and Lewis so I needed someone else
Westhoff will be 28 next year I wouldn't call that young ???
Haha #tradingbanter
Don't worry ossie, we have 5 movements left ;)
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on August 30, 2013, 12:23:54 PM
Quote from: whatlez on August 30, 2013, 12:19:03 PM
Yeah I agree with Ossie.
Zaha isn't in my top 5 players. Nor is Lewis and Murphy.
what is your point? you have Barlow, Cotchin, Griffin, Swallow I have Murphy and Lewis so I needed someone else
Westhoff will be 28 next year I wouldn't call that young ???
The point was that none of your players would even be considered skipper at the mighty Badgers lol, so not sure why you picked an average midfielder as a captain potential. That was my point. And Dion 'The Man' 'The greatest Gold Coast player ever' Prestia was actually a captain option.
why did you even make the conversation about your team?
Not sure. I was just bragging about my gun mids :P
Didn't help you much in the finals :P
Oh yeah while we're here, Cotchin and Griffen are on the table after making us lose the final series.
Lol really?
Nah off the market :D
Noticed that the OP has picks for 6 rounds, but says that is has it listed for 5. Are there gonna be 5 or 6 rounds? ???
The National draft will be over how many rounds it takes for all teams to complete the complement of 41 players so if you have 8 vacancies there will be 8 rounds for you.
Ah okay, I figured that would be the case.
Wow. We have pick 3 :D
Still some trades missing on that list Ringo! :)
What is the process for declining trades?
Quote from: PowerBug on September 02, 2013, 05:40:10 PM
Still some trades missing on that list Ringo! :)
What is the process for declining trades?
Still in the process of trolling through all trades to list on the front page PB hopefully all will be there tomorrow.
As per the Rules i will be ruling on all trades. If I decline a trade there is the option to appeal to the trades review committee to rule. If a majority of coaches also think that a trade should be negated then that trade will also be sent to the trades committee.
the trades committee are totally independent of British xv's having no teams and comprises Ziplock. MyChumps and Holzman
Hope that clarifies for you.
Wont trade for any offer
Jaeger O'Meara
Jack Steven
Oliver Wines
Lewis Johnston
Will need a good offer
Gary Rohan
Taylor Walker
Travis Cloke
Kane Lucas
Robert Murphy
Sharrod Wellingham
Greg Broughtan
Tom Jonas
Tim Membrey
Tim O'Brien
Jordan Lockyer
Adam Carter
Tom Temay
Hamish McIntosh
Mike Pyke
Tommy Walsh
Available for trade
Scott Thompson
Nick Dal Santo
James Kelly
Rhyce Shaw
Matthew Jaensch
Daniel Giansiracusa
Cameron Delaney
Easton Wood
Brett Goodes
Jonathan Griffin
Josh Tynan
Jed Bews
Delisting on throw in for a sweetener
Ahmed Saad
Kyal Horsley
Terry Milera
Stephen Wrigley
Dustin Fletcher
Callum Bartlett
Cameron Ellis-Yoleman
Jack Redpath
Tim McIntyre
Brett O'Hanlon
Im after youth and draft picks
Lewis Johnston Noz? Not under any offer? Will be lucky to get a game next year when Tex is back....
Speaking of the man, how much is that Tex in the window?
Quote from: SydneyRox on September 02, 2013, 06:29:43 PM
Lewis Johnston Noz? Not under any offer? Will be lucky to get a game next year when Tex is back....
Speaking of the man, how much is that Tex in the window?
Wrong, he'll keep Tex out of the side. ;)
Quote from: NigeyS on September 02, 2013, 06:53:16 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on September 02, 2013, 06:29:43 PM
Lewis Johnston Noz? Not under any offer? Will be lucky to get a game next year when Tex is back....
Speaking of the man, how much is that Tex in the window?
Wrong, he'll keep Tex out of the side. ;)
ok, so Tex should be a basement priced I guess?
Quote from: SydneyRox on September 02, 2013, 06:55:03 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on September 02, 2013, 06:53:16 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on September 02, 2013, 06:29:43 PM
Lewis Johnston Noz? Not under any offer? Will be lucky to get a game next year when Tex is back....
Speaking of the man, how much is that Tex in the window?
Wrong, he'll keep Tex out of the side. ;)
ok, so Tex should be a basement priced I guess?
To me? Yes. :P
Johnston is one of the players Adelaide have labeled as a much needed player and will not be traded by Adelaide under any circumstances that doesnt exactly sound like someone that won't be playing next year.
If you want Walker i want a young gun in return.
Have approved some trades on front page - Still contemplating others
Does that mean your not sure if the others a fair or just not looked at them yet?
Know this is not in the rules but if I will be rejecting a trade I will notify coaches involved and give them 49hrs to agree to a new deal prior to posting rejection. Think this is fair that coaches involved have 48hrs to renegotiate a fairer deal.
To answer KB's question it means I am still assessing them unless I have contacted you regarding possible rejection of trade.
Draft picks have also been amended to reflect trades now approved.
Woooo my trade passed. :D
Oh shower for trade 17 I think it's meant to be pick 29, not pick 26 and pick 29 is on traded.
Actually I'm confused how I am listed with pick 26. Would need to see how I got the pick haha
yeah i got 26 from the Bunnies but i don't think i ontraded it did i?
i cant see the trade anyway
Another stuff up by the administrator maybe he should be sacked :-[ :-[
Got a little crosseyed when updating draft picks Lez has pick 29 not pick 26 so assuming trade is now
Owls give: Nick Dal Santo and Greg Broughton
Badgers give: Sam Mayes and pick 29
If correct I will amend.
Yep, hopefully Vinny doesn't mind the extra 3 picks up :X
Nah fk this, deal is done...
Jokes, still on ;D
Ok I reject the trde as Lez did not have pick 26 to trade
Jokes on :D :D
Hahaha ;D
Ringo jokes? That doesn't happen often ;)
Seen him drop a few in the Jokes section in The Front Bar. He is a natural 8)
Some good ole daylight robbery
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 26, 2013, 11:43:23 AM
Some good ole daylight robbery
Haha dude you are against every trade that is made.
Quote from: elephants on September 26, 2013, 12:03:23 PM
Quote from: vinny on September 26, 2013, 12:01:04 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 26, 2013, 11:43:23 AM
Some good ole daylight robbery
Haha dude you are against every trade that is made.
It's sad really, every trade but his own of course ::)
Sorry for having an opinion on a forum ::)
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 26, 2013, 01:15:25 PM
Quote from: elephants on September 26, 2013, 12:03:23 PM
Quote from: vinny on September 26, 2013, 12:01:04 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 26, 2013, 11:43:23 AM
Some good ole daylight robbery
Haha dude you are against every trade that is made.
It's sad really, every trade but his own of course ::)
Sorry for having an opinion on a forum ::)
Feel free to have an opinion, but perhaps opening your other eye would be worthwhile.
Piece of life advice for ya.
Well I was right about the trade so maybe you should open your other eye ;)
You're still not right about the trade. Vinny's issue wasn't related to your issue aha.
Well it was since vinny thought watts scored better then he actually does ....
Haha ok mate, that's what you reckon ;)
wowee quickest trade approval ever
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 07, 2013, 06:55:08 PM
wowee quickest trade approval ever
Ringo certainly on the ball!
Was just finalising and yours popped in so ruled on that as well.
Ohhh yeah!!
Ringo have you got all the list movements correct? Like Werewolves have used 6 movements not 5.
Quote from: whatlez on October 12, 2013, 05:17:58 PM
Ringo have you got all the list movements correct? Like Werewolves have used 6 movements not 5.
One was with Lobsters who were using there additional movement as per rule change and as such Werewolves not counted as a player movement. remember the extra 2 player movements for the lower teams do not count for player movements so long as it is nominated as an extra movement.
Oh yeah, can you not have it in green, make it black like it is with myself and Nigey trade
Done
I've only used 5 movements or have I missed something?
Quote from: whatlez on October 15, 2013, 11:09:27 AM
I've only used 5 movements or have I missed something?
My apologies counted the extra movement trade incorrectly now amended,
Quote from: Ringo on October 15, 2013, 11:59:57 AM
Quote from: whatlez on October 15, 2013, 11:09:27 AM
I've only used 5 movements or have I missed something?
My apologies counted the extra movement trade incorrectly now amended,
All good Ringo :) (Y)
All trades approved 8)
BXV >WXV
Breakers Give: Garlett + Pick 69
Owls Give: Membrey + Pick 32
Vinny to confirm
Confirmed.
Yay! More Carlton players. :D
Bombers Give Pick 13
Magic give Aaron Hall
Surely the Bombers will be done for tanking
He was Pick 7 in PSD but that means little to nothing. Only thing I could see to justify for the trade. Maybe KB mixed it up, otherwise it makes 0 sense, haha.
Does Aaron Hall = Sam Day? If so then I see no problem in the trade.
Quote from: PowerBug on October 17, 2013, 09:02:59 PM
Does Aaron Hall = Sam Day? If so then I see no problem in the trade.
Nope.
Sam Day is a NAT #3 Pick.
Aaron Hall is a PSD #7 Pick.
PSD talent is not very good, well rarely good. :-\
Quote from: PowerBug on October 17, 2013, 09:02:59 PM
Does Aaron Hall = Sam Day? If so then I see no problem in the trade.
The Sam Day trade was horrible, but I wasn't in the mood to say anything lol
What was the Sam Day trade?
Quote from: PowerBug on October 17, 2013, 09:02:59 PM
Does Aaron Hall = Sam Day? If so then I see no problem in the trade.
Good forwards or young forwards with potential are not easy to get ;)
Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on October 17, 2013, 09:08:36 PM
Quote from: PowerBug on October 17, 2013, 09:02:59 PM
Does Aaron Hall = Sam Day? If so then I see no problem in the trade.
Good forwards or young forwards with potential are not easy to get ;)
I cannot see Day being that good fantasy wise anytime soon mate :-\
His scores were quite shockingly inconsistent,
And Day will be a defender only. Maybe F/B. And it's a game on contested possessions so not sure where he will get high points
Quote from: whatlez on October 17, 2013, 09:06:44 PM
Quote from: PowerBug on October 17, 2013, 09:02:59 PM
Does Aaron Hall = Sam Day? If so then I see no problem in the trade.
The Sam Day trade was horrible, but I wasn't in the mood to say anything lol
Sam Day was pick no 3 in the 2010 draft and has only just turned 21, we all no big men take time and my team needed a good young forward. Would i have been able to pick someone like Day up in the draft this year with pick 13 ? you guys can decide on that. I thought it was a good trade.
I know what else id like to say but im not in the mood ;)
Day only went at 3 cause West Coast would of taken him so GC used 3 on him and then GC had the next 5 l picks?
Quote from: whatlez on October 17, 2013, 09:19:18 PM
Day only went at 3 cause West Coast would of taken him so GC used 3 on him and then GC had the next 5 l picks?
If that makes you happy Lez
So he was taken at three because the team at 4 was going to pick him? So using your theory (might be true idk) he went at 4. Not much of a difference. ;)
He isn't that good in his last two years he played 15 and 20 games and averaged 8 and 10 disposals. He might be good one day but I would have rather taken the punt on Pick 13. In a fantasy drsft a gun can slip down.
Lol it's funny Wells who averages 110+ is equal to Day and Hall
I needed a forward im not going to hope that i can get a good forward at pick 13, he was always a long term prospect to me i never said he would come out firing next year.
Think ill go before i get abusive :-X
Haha how is it even possible to get abusive when we are discussing about a footy player for a fantasy competition trade?
Fair enough, your choice your team. Just reckon there is better prospects out there and Day has not shown much to make me think he will be good one day.
Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on October 17, 2013, 09:34:19 PM
I needed a forward im not going to hope that i can get a good forward at pick 13, he was always a long term prospect to me i never said he would come out firing next year.
Think ill go before i get abusive :-X
If you wanted a good young forward I woulda taken pick 13 for Cameron Hitchcock
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 17, 2013, 09:38:32 PM
Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on October 17, 2013, 09:34:19 PM
I needed a forward im not going to hope that i can get a good forward at pick 13, he was always a long term prospect to me i never said he would come out firing next year.
Think ill go before i get abusive :-X
If you wanted a good young forward I woulda taken pick 13 for Cameron Hitchcock
Hey hey .. didn't think it would take you long to comment ;)
I don't appreciate anyone hinting the Bombers are tanking i find this very harsh
Wells is like 29 years old a mid that averages 110 they are easy to find maybe worth more then pick 13 but nobody wanted him
Hall a very good young forward had a good solid year averaged 78 in Sportal and should only improve and GC are going to be a very good team for years to come
Seriously sick of people doing this with trades
Bombers list is still damn bloody good so i don't know how we can be seen as tanking and our list is now set for at least the next 3-5 years
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 17, 2013, 10:08:11 PM
I don't appreciate anyone hinting the Bombers are tanking i find this very harsh
Wells is like 29 years old a mid that averages 110 they are easy to find maybe worth more then pick 13 but nobody wanted him
Hall a very good young forward had a good solid year averaged 78 in Sportal and should only improve and GC are going to be a very good team for years to come
Seriously sick of people doing this with trades
Bombers list is still damn bloody good so i don't know how we can be seen as tanking and our list is now set for at least the next 3-5 years
By no means did I mean you guys were tanking KB! Not sure why you thought that.
I know you want a younger list as you want to be competitive for a long time and not just one year win a flag and struggle.
Your team and you can do whatever you want mate, people are just giving their opinion on trades. Same thing happened to my trades :)
Quote from: elephants on October 17, 2013, 08:09:56 PM
Surely the Bombers will be done for tanking
comment i was talking about
Oh, I didnt see that, haha. What a waste of typing :(
Wells I showed interest for long time so not sure where you got that idea
And I don't why you are so reluctant to win a premiership? Your list is alright, but in no way, you will be fighting for a premiership
you had pick 14 on offer for him and i got pick 13 for him lol
i know i'm not in premiership contention next year i never said i was but i will be for years to come after that
Just remember with trades there are a few restrictions with one for one trades which I have to take into consideration when ruling on trades. I am sure if our rule was not one for one there would have been different offers put up. As an example say Werewolves offered a first round pick for a player compared to the Lobsters first round pick. Trade has to be similar as both offering first round pick and Werewolves could not offer an additional sweetener with it based on one for one.
Trust this explains why some trades were approved that may have seemed unfair at first glance and makes sense,
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 17, 2013, 10:12:34 PM
Quote from: elephants on October 17, 2013, 08:09:56 PM
Surely the Bombers will be done for tanking
comment i was talking about
Haha sorry mate :( I often just say shower without thinking because no-one usually listens to me :P
Quote from: elephants on October 17, 2013, 10:52:38 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 17, 2013, 10:12:34 PM
Quote from: elephants on October 17, 2013, 08:09:56 PM
Surely the Bombers will be done for tanking
comment i was talking about
Haha sorry mate :( I often just say shower without thinking because no-one usually listens to me :P
I always listen to you. :P
I listen but rarely comment, I just lurk in the shadows waiting for my opening, ;)
Quote from: specky92 on October 17, 2013, 11:53:56 PM
I just lurk in the shadows waiting for my opening, ;)
That's just creepy. :o
I'm in love with your new dp btw, :P
Huddersfield give: Lewis Jetta + Jarryd Cachia
Staines give: Nick Riewoldt + Luke Mcpharlin
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 18, 2013, 11:02:41 PM
Huddersfield give: Lewis Jetta + Jarryd Cachia
Staines give: Nick Riewoldt + Luke Mcpharlin
Jetta and Cachia, equal to Mzungu and pick 32?
Jetta and Cachia are terrible players
Quote from: specky92 on October 17, 2013, 11:59:23 PM
I'm in love with your new dp btw, :P
You're one of many admirers, the main one being myself of course. ;)
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 18, 2013, 11:02:41 PM
Huddersfield give: Lewis Jetta + Jarryd Cachia
Staines give: Nick Riewoldt + Luke Mcpharlin
Confirm
think Lez just doesnt like any trade he is not involved in
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 18, 2013, 11:37:21 PM
think Lez just doesnt like any trade he is not involved in
too fussy
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 18, 2013, 11:37:21 PM
think Lez just doesnt like any trade he is not involved in
His Badgers are nervous... Don't know why though, they need to win a final before being close to threats for the cup.
Quote from: whatlez on October 18, 2013, 11:05:54 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 18, 2013, 11:02:41 PM
Huddersfield give: Lewis Jetta + Jarryd Cachia
Staines give: Nick Riewoldt + Luke Mcpharlin
Jetta and Cachia, equal to Mzungu and pick 32?
Jetta and Cachia are terrible players
You didnt want to do Mzungu and pick 32 ::)
Jetta >>>>> Mzungu.
I can't see Cachia getting many games at all. He is a tagger and we already have Curnow who is doing very solid. Plus I am not sure Mick rates him, post-game when commentators and journalists brought up Cachia's great game he kept pointing out mistakes and insisting he didnt play that well. Did not look at one positive at all. Just saying :)
Quote from: vinny on October 19, 2013, 02:01:20 PM
I can't see Cachia getting many games at all. He is a tagger and we already have Curnow who is doing very solid. Plus I am not sure Mick rates him, post-game when commentators and journalists brought up Cachia's great game he kept pointing out mistakes and insisting he didnt play that well. Did not look at one positive at all. Just saying :)
If Curnow wants to tag then Cachia will be released as the gun ball winning midfielder he was at Norwood. He was redrafted for a reason, his tagging games were probably just to get him used to AFL tempo.
Perhaps mate, I didnt actually know that. But that is not certain at all so just saying that as of now, Cachia isn't worth too much in terms of trade value in this competition. Jetta, I rate though. Not that I don't rate Cachia but just saying.
Quote from: Jayman on October 19, 2013, 01:57:58 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 18, 2013, 11:05:54 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 18, 2013, 11:02:41 PM
Huddersfield give: Lewis Jetta + Jarryd Cachia
Staines give: Nick Riewoldt + Luke Mcpharlin
Jetta and Cachia, equal to Mzungu and pick 32?
Jetta and Cachia are terrible players
You didnt want to do Mzungu and pick 32 ::)
Jetta >>>>> Mzungu.
Who's team are you on? Former Badgers coach?
In this competition: Mzungu > Jetta
http://fantasyafl.sportal.com.au/player/257
Quote from: vinny on October 19, 2013, 02:31:20 PM
In this competition: Mzungu > Jetta
http://fantasyafl.sportal.com.au/player/257
Jettas 2012 average much different ;) Plus hes a forward
value not much different though i'd nearly rather Jetta midfielders that average 94 are easy to find Jetta still has potential
Fair enough!
Oxford give: Travis Cloke + Brett Goodes + Lewis Johnston + NAT #9 + NAT #44
Liverpool give: Aaron Black + Dylan Shiel + Mitch Duncan + NAT #11 + Troy Chaplin
To break it down. Vin has been chasing Mitch Duncan and a defender like Chaplin for a while, while I've been doing the same for Goodes and Johnston. While we're both going young, we're both holding on to and looking for a bit of experience as well. Pick 9 for 11 is a small difference. I have a stack of defenders so losing Chaplin is fine. Black's young and should only get better while Cloke's pretty good as it is and I don't think his output will improve, but I'm happy to have him considering his potential to score quite nicely. I only use one list movement too as all that I'm giving bar Duncan are pick or players I've received this period, thus meaning they're being on-traded.
Very fair trade lads, I really have to think for a while to pick a winner! 8)
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 19, 2013, 02:36:02 PM
Quote from: vinny on October 19, 2013, 02:31:20 PM
In this competition: Mzungu > Jetta
http://fantasyafl.sportal.com.au/player/257
Jettas 2012 average much different ;) Plus hes a forward
29 >>>> Cachia lol.
Quote from: elephants on October 19, 2013, 03:35:33 PM
Very fair trade lads, I really have to think for a while to pick a winner! 8)
That's good to hear. I wanted to use my (not to toot my own horn) good trading skills to make sure it was as even as possible when I first put it forward to vin so that if he didn't like it, we could make slight adjustments. It caters to the needs and desires of both coaches/teams and so I can't see any reason it would be frowned upon.
Vinny still to confirm trade
Confirmed. 8)
This trade is fair. Credit to Nige for putting the deal on the table! Mastermind. It's exactly what both sides need. Although we gave up a solid back I think the others make up for it. We are hoping to fix our backline through drafting and future trading. :)
Although the loss of Cloke hurts for the sake of the team. I am glad we got rid of the flog. :P We will just rotate Garlett and Black based on form!
All trades that I have extracted have been ruled on. PM me if I have missed any as it is a little hard extracting them from the threads with all the comments.
Yay! Super speedy approval and a well done. Go Ringo! :D
I hear you want backs Vinny?
Quote from: whatlez on October 19, 2013, 06:47:39 PM
I hear you want backs Vinny?
Yeah I do mate. Got a few I see.
Quote from: whatlez on October 19, 2013, 02:28:27 PM
Quote from: Jayman on October 19, 2013, 01:57:58 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 18, 2013, 11:05:54 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 18, 2013, 11:02:41 PM
Huddersfield give: Lewis Jetta + Jarryd Cachia
Staines give: Nick Riewoldt + Luke Mcpharlin
Jetta and Cachia, equal to Mzungu and pick 32?
Jetta and Cachia are terrible players
You didnt want to do Mzungu and pick 32 ::)
Jetta >>>>> Mzungu.
Who's team are you on? Former Badgers coach?
I'm with tabs now. :)
Jetta was huge in 2012. He'll get back to that form, Mzungu has much lower potential.
Quote from: Jayman on October 19, 2013, 07:07:09 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 19, 2013, 02:28:27 PM
Quote from: Jayman on October 19, 2013, 01:57:58 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 18, 2013, 11:05:54 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 18, 2013, 11:02:41 PM
Huddersfield give: Lewis Jetta + Jarryd Cachia
Staines give: Nick Riewoldt + Luke Mcpharlin
Jetta and Cachia, equal to Mzungu and pick 32?
Jetta and Cachia are terrible players
You didnt want to do Mzungu and pick 32 ::)
Jetta >>>>> Mzungu.
Who's team are you on? Former Badgers coach?
I'm with tabs now. :)
Jetta was huge in 2012. He'll get back to that form, Mzungu has much lower potential.
flower your tbh. Your opinion doesn't even matter. Specky didn't replace you, you just let the team down lol
Jokes, but didn't even really say much.. Myself and Speck are disgusted
#Beef
#Judas :o
Steines goes on the list of teams the Badgers dislike. Lol.
I'm sure they care
Quote from: whatlez on October 19, 2013, 08:01:10 PM
Quote from: Jayman on October 19, 2013, 07:07:09 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 19, 2013, 02:28:27 PM
Quote from: Jayman on October 19, 2013, 01:57:58 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 18, 2013, 11:05:54 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 18, 2013, 11:02:41 PM
Huddersfield give: Lewis Jetta + Jarryd Cachia
Staines give: Nick Riewoldt + Luke Mcpharlin
Jetta and Cachia, equal to Mzungu and pick 32?
Jetta and Cachia are terrible players
You didnt want to do Mzungu and pick 32 ::)
Jetta >>>>> Mzungu.
Who's team are you on? Former Badgers coach?
I'm with tabs now. :)
Jetta was huge in 2012. He'll get back to that form, Mzungu has much lower potential.
flower your tbh. Your opinion doesn't even matter. Specky didn't replace you, you just let the team down lol
Jokes, but didn't even really say much.. Myself and Speck are disgusted
I was assistant and you didnt ask for my services the whole season ::)
Steins are where its at. #BadgersForSpoon
Hey tabs, remember how you got Jetta? ;) I believe it was a straight swap for Cooney. Ouch!
JayZ was going to join us but I let the Steins have him ;) #jayzholznozassistantdynasty
Quote from: vinny on October 19, 2013, 09:28:09 PM
JayZ was going to join us but I let the Steins have him ;) #jayzholznozassistantdynasty
Tabs was running solo so decided to lend him a hand.
Quote from: Jayman on October 19, 2013, 09:28:42 PM
Quote from: vinny on October 19, 2013, 09:28:09 PM
JayZ was going to join us but I let the Steins have him ;) #jayzholznozassistantdynasty
Tabs was running solo so decided to lend him a hand.
What could have been!
Haha I know mate
oh please
Co Coach kilbluff1985
Co Coach T Dog
Assistant Coach stew42
CEO nostradamus
Trade Adviser upthemaidens
#dynasty
we did have FOOTBALLFACTORY to :'(
is TDog the only active one there? :P
lol i get advice from stew he posts sometimes to but don't bother the others really nostradamus wanted to be CEO so he wasnt expected to do much lol
Haha
Quote from: nrich102 on October 19, 2013, 09:28:00 PM
Hey tabs, remember how you got Jetta? ;) I believe it was a straight swap for Cooney. Ouch!
That was from me :P and at the time I was getting a good deal :P
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 19, 2013, 10:25:01 PM
oh please
Co Coach kilbluff1985
Co Coach T Dog
Assistant Coach stew42
CEO nostradamus
Trade Adviser upthemaidens
#dynasty
we did have FOOTBALLFACTORY to :'(
Coach: JBsHawks
Assistant: JBsHawks
Ceo: JBsHawks
Trade advisor; JBsHawks
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 19, 2013, 11:16:53 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 19, 2013, 10:25:01 PM
oh please
Co Coach kilbluff1985 >jbshawks
Co Coach T Dog >jbshawks
Assistant Coach stew42 >jbshawks
CEO nostradamus >jbshawks
Trade Adviser upthemaidens >jbshawks
#dynasty
we did have FOOTBALLFACTORY to :'(
Coach: JBsHawks
Assistant: JBsHawks
Ceo: JBsHawks
Trade advisor; JBsHawks
:P
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 19, 2013, 11:16:53 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 19, 2013, 10:25:01 PM
oh please
Co Coach kilbluff1985
Co Coach T Dog
Assistant Coach stew42
CEO nostradamus
Trade Adviser upthemaidens
#dynasty
we did have FOOTBALLFACTORY to :'(
Coach: JBsHawks
Assistant: JBsHawks
Ceo: JBsHawks
Trade advisor; JBsHawks
The crew ;)
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 19, 2013, 11:16:53 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 19, 2013, 10:25:01 PM
oh please
Co Coach kilbluff1985
Co Coach T Dog
Assistant Coach stew42
CEO nostradamus
Trade Adviser upthemaidens
#dynasty
we did have FOOTBALLFACTORY to :'(
Coach: JBsHawks
Assistant: JBsHawks
Ceo: JBsHawks
Trade advisor; JBsHawks
#forever alone
Quote from: Jayman on October 19, 2013, 09:26:06 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 19, 2013, 08:01:10 PM
Quote from: Jayman on October 19, 2013, 07:07:09 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 19, 2013, 02:28:27 PM
Quote from: Jayman on October 19, 2013, 01:57:58 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 18, 2013, 11:05:54 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 18, 2013, 11:02:41 PM
Huddersfield give: Lewis Jetta + Jarryd Cachia
Staines give: Nick Riewoldt + Luke Mcpharlin
Jetta and Cachia, equal to Mzungu and pick 32?
Jetta and Cachia are terrible players
You didnt want to do Mzungu and pick 32 ::)
Jetta >>>>> Mzungu.
Who's team are you on? Former Badgers coach?
I'm with tabs now. :)
Jetta was huge in 2012. He'll get back to that form, Mzungu has much lower potential.
flower your tbh. Your opinion doesn't even matter. Specky didn't replace you, you just let the team down lol
Jokes, but didn't even really say much.. Myself and Speck are disgusted
I was assistant and you didnt ask for my services the whole season ::)
Steins are where its at. #BadgersForSpoon
You were co coach, but stood down to be a head worlds coach and I found specky. And he actually wanted to help with posting etc, so bad luck
#Badgersqrethebest #Speckystheman
Quote from: vinny on October 19, 2013, 09:28:09 PM
JayZ was going to join us but I let the Steins have him ;) #jayzholznozassistantdynasty
Holz has always been a part of the Badgers, he just feels bad for you :P
Quote from: nrich102 on October 19, 2013, 09:28:00 PM
Hey tabs, remember how you got Jetta? ;) I believe it was a straight swap for Cooney. Ouch!
really?? not my concern
how can the lobsters have 11 player movements? Thought the limit was 10
Quote from: Ringo on September 25, 2013, 04:19:13 PM
Result of Rule Change Votes:
16 coaches have now voted and the result of votes is as follows:
Vote 1
Each team franchise shall have a maximum of 10 player movements for the 2 trading periods with a minimum of 2 to be used in trade period 2.
13 votes for 3 against Vote carried
Vote 2:
Proposed additional rule in lieu of cap.
Teams finishing 13th - 16th are allowed an additional player movement
Teams finishing 17th - 18th are allowed an additional 2 player movements.
When making these additional trades they are to be announced as additional trade so as not to be counted as a player movement with other teams.
10 votes for 6 votes against Vote carried.
As a result of comments made in relation to vote there will be a secondary vote closing on mid night Friday to remove the minimum of 2 player movements required in period 2.
This vote will go out shortly.
pay attention tabs :P
Co-coaches: Spite & myself
Unofficial co-coach: Ricochet
#dynasty
Coach: NigeyS
CEO and Trade/Draft Consultant: Toga
Assistant Coach: GoLions16
Assistant Coach, Part-time Waterboy and Mascot: KoopKicka
#daboiz
#andcoop
Werewolves give Chris Dawes
Bombers give NAT pick 26
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 21, 2013, 07:57:38 PM
Werewolves give Chris Dawes
Bombers give NAT pick 26
confirm
Bombers give NAT Pick 18 + Dom Tyson
Leeches give NAT Pick 5 + NAT Pick 23
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 21, 2013, 09:55:08 PM
Bombers give NAT Pick 18 + Dom Tyson
Leeches give NAT Pick 5 + NAT Pick 23
confirm
Wow KB looking good man!
yeah good trading KB, but i rate dom tyson so good get for the leeches too, think he was a pick 5 and should be a GUN, but so should the next pick 5 :)
There's somebody I want in this years draft should get him with pick 5 but wouldn't have with pick 13
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 21, 2013, 10:15:12 PM
There's somebody I want in this years draft should get him with pick 5 but wouldn't have with pick 13
I know who it is. I think :P
Would be funny if he went at #4 :P
No ill rage quit lol
Even if he does means I'll get a slider
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 21, 2013, 10:17:22 PM
Would be funny if he went at #4 :P
Hahaha that would be gold. KB would flip. :P
Badgers receive: Judd + NAT 42 + ROOK 42
Steins receive: Mzungu + NAT 29 + ROOK 32
Magic Gives: Waters+Darling+NAT 21
FOR
Badgers Give: Vince+Brodie Smith+55
Is the list of List Movements in the OP how many teams have used up or have left?
I thought it was how many they had left but it looks like I was wrong on that point.
Used up mate, teams from 13th-18th have 11 though. Keep that in mind :)
Quote from: vinny on November 06, 2013, 08:37:31 PM
Used up mate, teams from 13th-18th have 11 though. Keep that in mind :)
15th-18th or 16th-18th have 12 though
Ok a trade between the Leeches and Cruisers.
Leeds Leeches give: Jarrad Waite + Jonathon Simpkin
Crosby Cruisers give: Sam Gilbert + Sam Kerridge
Given we feel our team is in a position to challenge for a Top 4 spot next season this trade makes sense for us. An un-vested Simpkin looks like a better, and more consistent, scorer than Kerridge. However, Kerridge has youth on his side and will be a good player in the future.
Gilbert has done well in the past but we have plenty of depth in defence, especially with Simpson and McVeigh likely to get def eligibility next year, and needed a forward which we get in Waite. Although injury-prone when he is fit he can score big so is worth the risk.
jhello to confirm.
Quote from: whatlez on October 26, 2013, 10:31:52 PM
Badgers receive: Judd + NAT 42 + ROOK 42
Steins receive: Mzungu + NAT 29 + ROOK 32
opps sorry
Confirm
Quote from: Memphistopheles on November 08, 2013, 12:08:05 PM
Ok a trade between the Leeches and Cruisers.
Leeds Leeches give: Jarrad Waite + Jonathon Simpkin
Crosby Cruisers give: Sam Gilbert + Sam Kerridge
Given we feel our team is in a position to challenge for a Top 4 spot next season this trade makes sense for us. An un-vested Simpkin looks like a better, and more consistent, scorer than Kerridge. However, Kerridge has youth on his side and will be a good player in the future.
Gilbert has done well in the past but we have plenty of depth in defence, especially with Simpson and McVeigh likely to get def eligibility next year, and needed a forward which we get in Waite. Although injury-prone when he is fit he can score big so is worth the risk.
jhello to confirm.
confirm
Newcastle Falcons give: Lindsay Thomas and Jackson Paine
Liverpool Lobsters give: Brent Reilly and ND Pick 49
Spink to confirm.
Spink wanted a defender, I felt that one of my depth defenders will surely step up to cover the loss of Reilly and 49 is being on-traded. Thomas either has great games or ordinary games while Jackson Paine's move to Brisbane should see him play more and become a decent scorer as he's got the potential.
Trading picks for players doesn't count as a movement anyway FYI
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 13, 2013, 10:40:32 AM
Trading picks for players doesn't count as a movement anyway FYI
Oh, really? Awesome.
If anyone wants to give me a reasonable midfield player for Pick 44, I'm happy to hear all offers.
Quote from: NigeyS on November 13, 2013, 10:57:07 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 13, 2013, 10:40:32 AM
Trading picks for players doesn't count as a movement anyway FYI
Oh, really? Awesome.
If anyone wants to give me a reasonable midfield player for Pick 44, I'm happy to hear all offers.
Good luck. I was being nice to give you Duigan for 55 lol
Quote from: whatlez on November 13, 2013, 11:07:02 AM
Quote from: NigeyS on November 13, 2013, 10:57:07 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 13, 2013, 10:40:32 AM
Trading picks for players doesn't count as a movement anyway FYI
Oh, really? Awesome.
If anyone wants to give me a reasonable midfield player for Pick 44, I'm happy to hear all offers.
Good luck. I was being nice to give you Duigan for 55 lol
I just need another mid to be safe. Matt Thomas hasn't been picked up yet so I need another mid (who is fringe best 22) not wanted/needed by somebody.
dunno why anyone would bother trading any player for pick 44
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 13, 2013, 11:49:39 AM
dunno why anyone would bother trading any player for pick 44
It's worth a try. :P
Quote from: NigeyS on November 13, 2013, 12:02:43 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 13, 2013, 11:49:39 AM
dunno why anyone would bother trading any player for pick 44
It's worth a try. :P
last year pick 44 could have snatched Neade, Terlich, Hutchings, Kommer, McBean or Laird, not sure on this years draft but it could definitely pay off, Nige isn't asking for anything special either
"could have" meaning chances are not great at all
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 13, 2013, 12:18:35 PM
"could have" meaning chances are not great at all
looking at pick 44 onwards they're actually some really nice players, obviously you'd want to know this years draft pool pretty well to take the deal
Quote from: specky92 on November 13, 2013, 12:24:22 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 13, 2013, 12:18:35 PM
"could have" meaning chances are not great at all
looking at pick 44 onwards they're actually some really nice players, obviously you'd want to know this years draft pool pretty well to take the deal
Which is why I'm equally as happy to keep the pick if nobody wants it. ;)
well Birmingham should hopefully get one or two gems have a bundle of picks around then btw i got Matt Jones with pick 63 last year was very handy
47. Hawks Bombers
48. Hurricanes
49. Hoods Werewolves Bombers Lobsters
50. Badgers Bombers
51. Breakers
52. Bombers
53. Hedgehogs
54. Werewolves Bombers
Round 4
55. Lobsters Badgers Magic
56. Swaggers Bombers
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 13, 2013, 12:29:13 PM
well Birmingham should hopefully get one or two gems have a bundle of picks around then btw i got Matt Jones with pick 63 last year was very handy
47. Hawks Bombers
48. Hurricanes
49. Hoods Werewolves Bombers Lobsters
50. Badgers Bombers
51. Breakers
52. Bombers
53. Hedgehogs
54. Werewolves Bombers
Round 4
55. Lobsters Badgers Magic
56. Swaggers Bombers
Got Mark Hutchings with 89 in WXVs. #steal
was that more pure luck though or did you know about him?
i knew about Jones before he got popular last pre season was stoked to get him think the Bombers first pick was 63 cause Holz traded them all lol
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 13, 2013, 12:56:16 PM
was that more pure luck though or did you know about him?
i knew about Jones before he got popular last pre season was stoked to get him think the Bombers first pick was 63 cause Holz traded them all lol
I knew about him and was like "is this guy seriously still left? :o"
I remembered him getting rookie listed at the Saints and follow him since. I just wasn't sure how'd he go at the Eagles but was happy to pick him. Now I'm his (equal) biggest fan (along with ele). ;D 8)
Quote from: NigeyS on November 13, 2013, 01:11:15 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 13, 2013, 12:56:16 PM
was that more pure luck though or did you know about him?
i knew about Jones before he got popular last pre season was stoked to get him think the Bombers first pick was 63 cause Holz traded them all lol
I knew about him and was like "is this guy seriously still left? :o"
I remembered him getting rookie listed at the Saints and follow him since. I just wasn't sure how'd he go at the Eagles but was happy to pick him. Now I'm his (equal) biggest fan (along with ele). ;D 8)
I'll claim 3rd biggest fan after stealing him off kb in Americas right before he averages 105, 8)
meh i don't need him over there
If Matt Jones was in your starting squad, you're going to have a bad time.
Quote from: whatlez on November 13, 2013, 01:28:00 PM
If Matt Jones was in your starting squad, you're going to have a bad time.
past tense <-----------------------------------> future tense ::) :P
The statement couldn't work if I kept it in past tense lol
i said he came in handy ::) go play with your midfield or do some drills on how to win finals Lez ;D
Quote from: NigeyS on November 13, 2013, 10:30:52 AM
Newcastle Falcons give: Lindsay Thomas and Jackson Paine
Liverpool Lobsters give: Brent Reilly and ND Pick 49
Spink to confirm.
Spink wanted a defender, I felt that one of my depth defenders will surely step up to cover the loss of Reilly and 49 is being on-traded. Thomas either has great games or ordinary games while Jackson Paine's move to Brisbane should see him play more and become a decent scorer as he's got the potential.
Confirmed for the reasons above.
Someone take my Rookie 7 for something! :P
Trade 47
Owls give: Tom Mitchell + NAT 25
Bombers give: Andrew Swallow + NAT 47
Trade still being assessed based on list movements - just need to confirm how many movements Owls have used. Owls do not get extra movements as they finished 12th. Have not got all data in NZ but will look at what I have to try and rule by the weekend.
Hey Ringo i just noticed this btw Mitchell and Swallow are both on trades so movements should not be an issue
Yep, both on-traded.
Thank You both - Will verify and rule on trade later today. Tourist today in the geo thermal regions of NZ
Crosby Cruisers give: M Boyd + J Adcock + H Scotland
Newcastle Falcons give: J Martin + D Smith + Pick 46 Nat
While this does strip us of our young talent, it does give us proven guns who will give us a very strong chance of a flag.
Wow.
Martin + Smith = Boyd + Scotland + Adcock.
Considering Scotland will be rookie listed, it's more even I spose
Wow sums it up pretty well, haha.
Quote from: Spinking on November 16, 2013, 05:39:24 PM
Crosby Cruisers give: M Boyd + J Adcock + H Scotland
Newcastle Falcons give: J Martin + D Smith + Pick 46 Nat
While this does strip us of our young talent, it does give us proven guns who will give us a very strong chance of a flag.
Confirm.
Reasons as follows.
Jack Martin and Devon Smith are both future guns, could get 10 good years out of them and we think both should become premos.
Scotland has one season left imo, while Boyd probably has 2-3 but is a deadset gun/premo.
Adcock also a gun/premo back but you have to give something to get something.
Looking at who we will delist (3 to chop I think) and we would actually just use that last pick as well.
Yes it sets our team back a little next season but it sets us up for the future - it's not often you get a chance to pick up a player like Martin who has been touted as better than JOM (if that's possible) so we couldn't resist.
Basically the trade sets up Spinking's team to put in a real good flag challenge and our team will still be strong but come on real even stronger when some of our younger players (like Martin and Smith) develop.
Cruiser getting busy close to deadline day. Here's another one involving us.
Crosby gives: Jarrad McVeigh+NAT 46
Hebden Bridge gives: Nathan Jones + Curtly Hampton
Elephants to confirm.
From our perspective Nathan Jones better fits into our premiership window given the previous trade we did and under Paul Roos and with more help we think he should thrive.
McVeigh is an out-and-out gun and will be dpp next season which is valuable but Hampton is on the rise and can start for us next year in def so it's suitable compensation.
Confirmed.
Jones is going to be great under Roos and Hampton has a lot of promise.
McVeigh is a proven scorer and something we were hunting for.
Trade works well for the future ambitions of both sides :D
Quote from: Memphistopheles on November 17, 2013, 02:35:09 PM
Cruiser getting busy close to deadline day. Here's another one involving us.
Crosby gives: Jarrad McVeigh+NAT 46
Hebden Bridge gives: Nathan Jones + Curtly Hampton
Elephants to confirm.
From our perspective Nathan Jones better fits into our premiership window given the previous trade we did and under Paul Roos and with more help we think he should thrive.
McVeigh is an out-and-out gun and will be dpp next season which is valuable but Hampton is on the rise and can start for us next year in def so it's suitable compensation.
Thanks for letting me know our deal was off.
Bombers give NAT 5 + Rookie 34
Owls give NAT 7 + Rookie 7
Confirm
That's an enormous rookie upgrade for a small Nat upgrade ???
Quote from: elephants on November 17, 2013, 05:53:13 PM
That's an enormous rookie upgrade for a small Nat upgrade ???
NAT >>>Rookie duh
Rookie draft isnt that strong in British
Yeah rookie draft is shower in comparison to NAT. Most players were picked last season that were of any value. :P
Yeah the trade only interests us cause we have to draft 4 rookies and now have 3 first round rookie picks
still depending on who teams delist and who of them get picked up in the AFL preseason draft rookie 7 could be a valuable pick just....
also given a few gems out of the sanfl wafl etc will go in the preseason.
i like the trade 7 to 5 a solid upgrade also that close to the pointy end. the rook upgrade balances it nicely.
Cheers Colli, yeah a top 10 pick upgrade is a big deal, could be the difference in getting the player you want!
If someone has someone legitimately valuable that is quite young for NAT PICK 5. Let me know :)
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 17, 2013, 05:38:17 PM
Bombers give NAT 5 + Rookie 34
Owls give NAT 7 + Rookie 7
Lol. Win to the Owls there I reckon. Rookie picks are worth practically nothing in this comp. Suppose it depends who goes at 5 though.
Personally think picks 5-10 are pretty similar values.
Quote from: Spinking on November 17, 2013, 06:09:25 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 17, 2013, 05:38:17 PM
Bombers give NAT 5 + Rookie 34
Owls give NAT 7 + Rookie 7
Lol. Win to the Owls there I reckon. Rookie picks are worth practically nothing in this comp. Suppose it depends who goes at 5 though.
the guy we really want will still be there at NAT 7 so whatever you reckon
yeah picks are close and trade is even, so as long as both parties are getting what suits them no fuss :)
there are some real smokies in this seasons draft, and the point about the picks being similar in value by JB is valid, but so is the point about it could be the difference between getting the player you want or not :)
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 17, 2013, 05:54:20 PM
Quote from: elephants on November 17, 2013, 05:53:13 PM
That's an enormous rookie upgrade for a small Nat upgrade ???
NAT >>>Rookie duh
... No shower. I'm making an observation.
Trade period closed at midnight last night right?
Because we did have another deal arranged though due to unforseen circumstances it wasn't able to be confirmed in time.
I guess it's alright - we can do it in the next period anyway.
Trade Period 2 is now open and will finish on Sunday 9th February
All trades to be posted in this thread
Falcons give: A Christenson + N Suban
Cruisers give: M Pavlich + K Simpson
Lose an up and coming star in Christenson, but gain 2 starters who have a couple of years in the tank.
Still waiting for Oss or memph to confirm this trade,
Quote from: Spinking on December 04, 2013, 07:23:39 PM
Falcons give: A Christenson + N Suban
Cruisers give: M Pavlich + K Simpson
Lose an up and coming star in Christenson, but gain 2 starters who have a couple of years in the tank.
Confirm. Sorry was in a meeting all morning.
Another trade involving the Cruisers. Helps balance our team out.
Liverpool give: Luke Delaney and Jackson Paine
Crosby give: Dan Currie and Jonathan Simpkin
Simpkin is an on-trade for us and I think both guys are an on-trade for Liverpool.
Nigey to confirm
To be clearer on our reasonings (I just read the rules blurb where it says reason need to be given) we felt that having lost Simpson and Pavlich in the last trade we could do with a bit more def and fwd def which we get in Delaney and Paine who should both improve at new clubs.
Nigey was after Currie as a back-up as he already has Goldy and Ben Brown and with Christensen's arrival Simpkin would have just been depth.
As for the previous trade we get a future young gun in Christensen as well as a good depth defender in Suban which fits into our new age profile/approach following the acquisition of Jack Martin in the first trade period. Simpson should get dpp and will be good and Pav is a gun but they are aging and only have a few seasons left compared with 5+ for the other two.
Quote from: Memphistopheles on December 05, 2013, 07:55:49 PM
Another trade involving the Cruisers. Helps balance our team out.
Liverpool give: Luke Delaney and Jackson Paine
Crosby give: Dan Currie and Jonathan Simpkin
Simpkin is an on-trade for us and I think both guys are an on-trade for Liverpool.
Nigey to confirm
Yep, both those boys are on-trades for us as that's all we can do.
Got a fair few defenders and forwards, and we need to boost our mid depth and get a slightly more experienced mid who should get games, so Joffa Simpkin comes in. Dan Currie was pursued because we have Ben Brown and we figure if Majak (who we don't have) and Goldy are injured for North, one of Currie or Benny will play. :P
EDIT: Should probably say... Confirmed!
Could offload Breust for a midfielder!
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on December 05, 2013, 08:03:56 PM
Could offload Breust for a midfielder!
shower that's tempting, but I can only on-trade... and the two blokes I can on-trade, I would rather keep. :(
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on December 05, 2013, 08:03:56 PM
Could offload Breust for a midfielder!
what kind of midfielder?
A good one :P
Surely not that good
Hedgehogs are currently not too keen to listen to offers. Waiting for dpp's to become official.
As too are a few coaches ;) ;)
Looking for a player who's good. Could trade my bulk defenders or trade Higgins. Anyone keen?
Just remember those coaches with extra movements who have not nominated and used them can trade with any coach and that does not count as a player movement for that coach.
Lobsters have used their 2
Swaggers have 2 and Steins, Giants, Magic and Leeches all 1 have an additional list movements if required.
So that's us done for the trade period then in terms of list movements.
Pretty happy with all the deals that we've done. Team should still be very competitive next season and looks very strong going forwards.
Uless you want to make a deal withose that have bonus movements.
Massive trade here.
Falcons give: Joel Selwood
Breakers Give: Dane Swan
Good trade for both sides I think. Falcons get Swan, who is a gun but in the later stage of his career, while Jelwood is younger, and is a gun.
Spink to confirm
What the flower, is this a joke?
Quote from: nrich102 on December 09, 2013, 08:29:46 PM
Massive trade here.
Falcons give: Joel Selwood
Breakers Give: Dane Swan
Good trade for both sides I think. Falcons get Swan, who is a gun but in the later stage of his career, while Jelwood is younger, and is a gun.
Spink to confirm
Hahahahahaha seriously?
Quote from: nrich102 on December 09, 2013, 08:29:46 PM
Massive trade here.
Falcons give: Joel Selwood
Breakers Give: Dane Swan
Good trade for both sides I think. Falcons get Swan, who is a gun but in the later stage of his career, while Jelwood is younger, and is a gun.
Confirmed. It was all about premiership windows for us. Ours is closing fast and Swanny gives us a very good chance at the flag. Selwood will still be a gun for many years to come...
Are you serious... Selwood is going to be the equal second best if not the best in the comp next year. Come on Spink.
Selwood > Swan or at least equal.
Dafuq
Quote from: vinny on December 09, 2013, 08:33:22 PM
Are you serious... Selwood is going to be the equal second best if not the best in the comp next year. Come on Spink.
Selwood > Swan or at least equal.
I have faith in the pig...
Come on mate, you will seriously regret this. Big time.
Selwood is a great chance at the brownlow next year.
He has one year left your trading him for a guy just as good with severaly years left
Selwood would probably outscore Swan.
Quote from: whatlez on December 09, 2013, 08:35:57 PM
Selwood would probably will ooutscore Swan.
It's the whole reason people in SC are starting Selwood over Swan..
Quote from: whatlez on December 09, 2013, 08:35:57 PM
Selwood would probably outscore Swan.
This.
Everyone knows this comp is driven by contested ball. Jelwood will absolutely shred the comp.
not just about contested possessions.
swan averaged 20 more PER GAME than selwood last sesaon
just saying.
157 to 137
Quote from: Colliwobblers on December 09, 2013, 08:43:05 PM
not just about contested possessions.
swan averaged 20 more PER GAME than selwood last sesaon
just saying.
157 to 137
you reckon this trade is fair?
Come on guys bear in mind this is Sportal scoring which favours Swan a little.
I was involved in the negotiations and am happy with it.
Average ppg from this year under SC scoring:
Swan 154.76
Selwood 135.95
( I have all the records for this year so if you want to check any scores etc with me feel free to PM me)
So imo trade is reasonably even for the reasons that Swan is reaching the end of his career whereas Selwood has a little youth on his side.
Anyway as per the rules I set for the Breakers trade is being run through the trades committee as well prior to ruling.
Yeah I realised that Swan averaged a lot more. But Swan to go down and Selwood up. But I don't care if Falcons want to struggle past 2014.
Thing is though, Selwood is 25. We haven't even seen the best of him yet.
Look at his last 9 games. That is the kind of performances we should expect regularly from Selwood.
Swan has what, 1? 2? years left? I am banking on it being 2.
Cannot believe this discussion is taking place.
So extra 20ppg for 1-2 years vs destruction of the AFL for the next 7.
And I don't even think it will be 20ppg like this year, like ele said Selwood killed the second half.
He is young too, think difference will be 5ppg in Selwoods favour in 2014 and 10 in 2015.
But I don't really mind, your team.
Yeah to be honest, I am not hugely fussed. Just makes a middle-tier team more dangerous and weakens a premiership threat. Makes the comp more even if anything :P
Quote from: vinny on December 09, 2013, 08:43:46 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on December 09, 2013, 08:43:05 PM
not just about contested possessions.
swan averaged 20 more PER GAME than selwood last sesaon
just saying.
157 to 137
you reckon this trade is fair?
i reckon the guy getting selwood wins due to his age. but swan should outscore him or at least match him for the next 2-3 seasons.
i traded selwood for jack redden.
fortunately i then traded redden for fyfe.
not every trade has to be even as long as it isnt ridiculous and i think this one is not ridiculous. each to his own, but swan has been #1 or #2 mid in this comp for many years.
selwood hasn't gotten any better he has always been elite, he probably wont get any better, he is already elite, but has NEVER outscored swan in this comp. likely never will.
swans clangers were significantly down last season also, and under bucks you would expect his work rate to be up.....
hard to call - i say selwood wins but only on age and not by a lot. up to Ringo tho not me :)
always surprises me tho every season even after 6 years everyone keeps saying selwwod will get so much better.... why?
think he is as good as he will ever be myself, not knocking him he is very good but why after 6 seasons do we think he is going to suddenly take another leap forward.?
still great player and for this comp and has many years to go where swan has 2-3 i would say, as long as he conforms to bucks ways, which if he does - HE probably will get better.
Your getting Selwood for Swan of course your happy Ringo :P
Spinking could have gotten a much better deal IMO really should advertise when trading guns
I assume you put your head in the sand in the second half of the season Colli? :P
Joel Selwood WILL win a brownlow. He ALMOST beat Gary Ablett JNR this season!
His last couple of months were absolutely outstanding and are just a taste of what is to come.
You sure there's no bias here mate? ;) Swan being a Pie and Selwood one of your most hated players (after the Eagles team list)? ;)
Trade suits boths needs, although personally wpuldnt destroy my teams future like that but each to there own. Good trade!
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/collingwood-star-dane-swan-sets-2014-as-his-retirement-date/story-e6frf9jf-1226278748909 (http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/collingwood-star-dane-swan-sets-2014-as-his-retirement-date/story-e6frf9jf-1226278748909)
You would reckon the main idea of recruiting guys like Karny and Adams that Swan will play more forward next year to make sure he doesnt run out of steam.
Did not realise this trade would cause so much comment
Remember trades do not have to be equal and reasons given are taken into consideration.
Spinking advised
Confirmed. It was all about premiership windows for us. Ours is closing fast and Swanny gives us a very good chance at the flag. Selwood will still be a gun for many years to come...
For Breakers allows us to establish a permanent captain for the club post swan which we needed.
Quote from: elephants on December 09, 2013, 08:59:12 PM
I assume you put your head in the sand in the second half of the season Colli? :P
Joel Selwood WILL win a brownlow. He ALMOST beat Gary Ablett JNR this season!
His last couple of months were absolutely outstanding and are just a taste of what is to come.
You sure there's no bias here mate? ;) Swan being a Pie and Selwood one of your most hated players (after the Eagles team list)? ;)
hey i like SOME eagles - i like you don't I
its only the little short ones with no necks that i dont like :)
and yes i hate selwood, if you have to lift your arm in a tackle to draw a high tackle and a free kick then you suck.
but he doesnt duck anymore he got that out of his game last season so i like him 50% more than i did in 2012 :)
he will have to win the brownlow this season because there are a number of younger players who look set to go past him and all the other guns very very quickly....
and i did say the guy getting selwood wins, but not enough to bag the guy giving him up....
and never write off the pig. i am very biased but he has not failed me yet and still finished #2 in the comp last season....
swan will play more fwd, and earn contested possessions there and kick goals. did plenty of that last season. not sure how it will effect his score but good point noz.
i never put my head in the sand, if i'm wrong i'm the first to say so, but my money on swan again for 2014 out of the two ;)
Stopped ducking and just through his legs out whenever he felt pressure
Quote from: Noz on December 09, 2013, 09:06:20 PM
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/collingwood-star-dane-swan-sets-2014-as-his-retirement-date/story-e6frf9jf-1226278748909 (http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/collingwood-star-dane-swan-sets-2014-as-his-retirement-date/story-e6frf9jf-1226278748909)
You would reckon the main idea of recruiting guys like Karny and Adams that Swan will play more forward next year to make sure he doesnt run out of steam.
You literally posted an article that they have since released an updated version as swan went back on his word and will play a few more years so it was completely irrelevant.
The main idea of recruiting Adams and Karny was to get the best players possible for as little as possible.
Swan will play mid and be rested as a forward like usual. I have spoken to him after that old article and it seemed like he would rather retire than play the game as an average footballer so I'm not sure he will ever be keen to play as a forward in the same way we expect gazza to eventually.
I think selwood wins in this trade but as colli said, that's mostly due to age and I don't believe the trade is so unrealistically lop sided that it needs to be vetoed.
Sorry for typing error I'm on my phone
I'd back in Spink's move to pay off tbh.
Lets just look at Joel Selwood's scores since round 15.
191, 167, 158, 171, 136, 178, 165, 154, 132.
Thats 9 games running @ 162 ppg. Roughly what Ablett averaged this season.
Food for thought.
In saying that... Seeing as the opinions are so divided, if both teams are happy, the trade should probably go through IMO.
Did not expect the discussion that this trade invoked but that is the advantage of an open forum.
The trade is being approved as the independent trades committee have all approved it. For those who are unsure who the trades committee is it is Ziplock, Mr, Craig and My Chumps none of whom are involved as coach or co coach in British.
Chucking in my 2c worth:
Selwood>Swan
Well you know my view on the actual trade. But in saying that, it's been approved by the committee, both teams are happy and it's not my team so can't argue.
It's not the worst trade I've seen and I don't mind it. I can't see any reason why it should be rejected.
It's funny though, if this trade had gone through last season probably a few people would be leaning the other way.
Quote from: stew42 on December 10, 2013, 03:30:06 PM
Chucking in my 2c worth:
Selwood>Swan
SSelwood > Jelwood > Swan ;)
Quote from: Memphistopheles on December 10, 2013, 04:01:06 PM
It's not the worst trade I've seen and I don't mind it. I can't see any reason why it should be rejected.
It's funny though, if this trade had gone through last season probably a few people would be leaning the other way.
Not really, haha. Selwood averaged 117 last year and went under 99 twice and that's SC. Can only imagine it is even more in Sportal.
Troy Selwood > Scooter > Jelwood > Swan
Quote from: NigeyS on December 10, 2013, 04:24:36 PM
Troy Selwood > Adam Selwood > Scooter > Jelwood > Swan
Bryce Selwood > Troy Selwood > Adam Selwood > Scooter > Jelwood > Swan
Quote from: Ricochet on December 10, 2013, 04:48:36 PM
whatlez > Bryce Selwood > Troy Selwood > Adam Selwood > Scooter > Jelwood > Swan
Jormas > whatlez
Settle guys please and let the thread get back on track.
No need for the last few posts so keep to the topic please.
Falcons give: S Burgoyne
Birmingham give: C Dawes.
Meets both teams needs. KB was after a def, and I wanted a Fwd.
Quote from: Spinking on December 12, 2013, 09:45:31 AM
Falcons give: S Burgoyne
Birmingham give: C Dawes.
Meets both teams needs. KB was after a def, and I wanted a Fwd.
Confirmed
Goes against our youth policy but we have a stacked forward line now and were desperate for a defender with Lester being mid only
Breakers Give: Steele Sidebottom and Nathan Wright
Hawks Give: Cyril Rioli and Koby Stevens
We need a forward, and we think if Rioli can get his body right, he will be good. Sidebottom is a gun, and young, but we brought in Jelwood, who is only 2 years older, so we wont need another captain for a while.
JB to confirm
The Hawks are gonna be dominant.
Quote from: nrich102 on December 12, 2013, 07:12:06 PM
Breakers Give: Steele Sidebottom and Nathan Wright
Hawks Give: Cyril Rioli and Koby Stevens
We need a forward, and we think if Rioli can get his body right, he will be good. Sidebottom is a gun, and young, but we brought in Jelwood, who is only 2 years older, so we wont need another captain for a while.
JB to confirm
Confirmed!
If anyone needs fwds, we have millions :P
Looking for a premo midfielder + back depth ;)
Quote from: nrich102 on December 12, 2013, 07:12:06 PM
Breakers Give: Steele Sidebottom and Nathan Wright
Hawks Give: Cyril Rioli and Koby Stevens
We need a forward, and we think if Rioli can get his body right, he will be good. Sidebottom is a gun, and young, but we brought in Jelwood, who is only 2 years older, so we wont need another captain for a while.
JB to confirm
Breakers losing the plot
Got defenders and mids to sell. Looking for a forward!
Quote from: whatlez on December 14, 2013, 03:21:06 PM
Got defenders and mids to sell. Looking for a forward!
Quote from: elephants on December 12, 2013, 08:07:27 PM
If anyone needs fwds, we have millions :P
Looking for a premo midfielder + back depth ;)
werewolves need a premium defender or two, have mids to trade premium and or star youths.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on December 15, 2013, 10:08:45 AM
werewolves need a premium defender or two, have mids to trade premium and or star youths.
The Badgers can help :)
Burgoyne might be on the table now that I have Roughead for depth
Not really after any position in particular just someone young
Steins give: Ryan Okeefe + Beau Maister
Hawks give: James Frawley + Lachie Hunter
Memph to confirm
Confirmed.
Sorry whatlez but we actually do like this deal and don't feel we are getting ripped off like you do.
Hunter is a gun of the future and Frawley is still reasonably young (26) this year) and a better SC scorer than DT so will improve this year.
After this, does that make our deal impossible due to movements Memph? :(
Memph has 7 movements
Oh yeah true, that's fine haha.
If Memph and Lez could reply my PMs, that'd be great.
Quote from: NigeyS on February 18, 2014, 08:53:00 PM
If Memph and Lez could reply my PMs, that'd be great.
Done
Steins give: Jason Johannisen
Rams give: Nathan Hrovat
Quote from: NigeyS on February 18, 2014, 09:57:15 PM
Steins give: Jason Johannisen
Rams give: Nathan Hrovat
Confirmed
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 18, 2014, 10:26:12 PM
Quote from: elephants on February 18, 2014, 10:08:33 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 18, 2014, 09:39:12 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 18, 2014, 08:53:00 PM
If Memph and Lez could reply my PMs, that'd be great.
Done
And Ricochet's?
you reply to mine or post the trade :o
Was out, just got back. Talking to the boys about it now. Would appreciate it if you didn't publicly use us as leverage to get you more for our deal.
lol wait so i get given a hard time when i do deals then people say they would have offered more and i should have advertised
advertise a deal and people still complain
cant win
As a general rule I've always seen it as pretty dog to advertise players when a deal is on the verge of going through. Thats just me though, guess others think differently..
Quote from: elephants on February 19, 2014, 12:07:17 AM
As a general rule I've always seen it as pretty dog to advertise players when a deal is on the verge of going through. Thats just me though, guess others think differently..
i understand but that's why i did it people have given me a hard time in the past over it for not doing it so i figure if i do it one less thing then give me a hard time about
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 19, 2014, 12:09:23 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 19, 2014, 12:07:17 AM
As a general rule I've always seen it as pretty dog to advertise players when a deal is on the verge of going through. Thats just me though, guess others think differently..
i understand but that's why i did it people have given me a hard time in the past over it for not doing it so i figure if i do it one less thing then give me a hard time about
You've done it to as well...
Quote from: whatlez on February 19, 2014, 12:10:52 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 19, 2014, 12:09:23 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 19, 2014, 12:07:17 AM
As a general rule I've always seen it as pretty dog to advertise players when a deal is on the verge of going through. Thats just me though, guess others think differently..
i understand but that's why i did it people have given me a hard time in the past over it for not doing it so i figure if i do it one less thing then give me a hard time about
You've done it to as well...
done what? i don't see what's so bad about it i thought i was doing what people wanted you yourself always post shower like "i would have offered more"
Well you've posted in this thread, what I was offering.
Quote from: whatlez on February 19, 2014, 12:19:30 AM
Well you've posted in this thread, what I was offering.
and?
I am on elephants side
good for you i don't see a problem with it people do it all the time
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 19, 2014, 12:32:22 AM
good for you i don't see a problem with it people do it all the time
People kill other people all the time, is there no problem with that? ;)
Quote from: elephants on February 19, 2014, 12:40:35 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 19, 2014, 12:32:22 AM
good for you i don't see a problem with it people do it all the time
People kill other people all the time, is there no problem with that? ;)
::) LOL comparing trading to killing people well done :o
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 19, 2014, 12:42:28 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 19, 2014, 12:40:35 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 19, 2014, 12:32:22 AM
good for you i don't see a problem with it people do it all the time
People kill other people all the time, is there no problem with that? ;)
::) LOL comparing trading to killing people well done :o
It was said in jest, hence the wink face ::)
Settle guys do not get personal or you will face time on sidelines.
I will go through all the trades later today and hopefully rule on them.
Can you also check the OP and see I have all trades listed as well please.
Quote from: Ringo on February 19, 2014, 10:32:41 AM
Settle guys do not get personal or you will face time on sidelines.
Yeah for sure. I like kb, nothing untoward meant from my end. Hard to interpret emphasis/expression/tone on a forum :P
Quote from: elephants on February 19, 2014, 12:43:36 PM
Hard to interpret emphasis/expression/tone on a forum :P
Haha yes! flowerin' oath. :P
Quote from: NigeyS on February 19, 2014, 12:46:55 PM
Quote from: elephants on February 19, 2014, 12:43:36 PM
Hard to interpret emphasis/expression/tone on a forum :P
Haha yes! flowerin' oath. :P
Damn it sarcasm sucks on the internet.
Werewolves give: Ben Cunnington
Bunnies give: Luke Dahlhaus
Similar players. We were looking for some more depth in the forwards and despite thinking that Cunnington will be a very good player, we feel he can be covered in the mids.
SydneyRox to confirm
Quote from: Rusty00 on February 20, 2014, 12:20:12 PM
Werewolves give: Ben Cunnington
Bunnies give: Luke Dahlhaus
Similar players. We were looking for some more depth in the forwards and despite thinking that Cunnington will be a very good player, we feel he can be covered in the mids.
SydneyRox to confirm
Confirm. Exact opposite for us. Need the extra mid and feel we have Dahlhaus covered with DPP players.
Ok after looking at the trades we are happy to stick with the ones we've done so far in lieu of possibly moving back the Sportal Scoring System if the other coaches involved are ok with them.
We also have our last trade (well the last of our list movements) to announce.
Steins gives: Hartlett+M Brown (Eagles)+Crisp
Birmingham gives: Lester+Michie+Perris
Seems a little one sided at the moment as Hartlett is a gun but we believe Lester will break out this season and Michie will cement a spot in the Demons side this year and having those two mids will help us more than having Hamstring Hartlett.
Also Perris was arguably the steal of the AFL draft and will be a jet in future seasons.
Confirmed
We have enough depth but wanted a better utility 2 player we feel this improves our starting XV greatly
Two good trades today actually.
@ KB why didnt you shop this one!! Might have been keener if I knew Perris was up for grabs! :P
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 20, 2014, 07:34:27 PM
@ KB why didnt you shop this one!! Might have been keener if I knew Perris was up for grabs! :P
Hahaha, we wanted to keep that part under the radar ;) ;)
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 20, 2014, 07:34:27 PM
@ KB why didnt you shop this one!! Might have been keener if I knew Perris was up for grabs! :P
We were after a young gun doubt you would give one up
And i put up a list who was for sale in the other thread days ago
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 20, 2014, 07:55:35 PM
And i put up a list who was for sale in the other thread days ago
That's where I picked up on it :)
Rusty and I are happy to relist this one thank Ringo
Werewolves give: Ben Cunnington
Bunnies give: Luke Dahlhaus
Rusty to confirm
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 21, 2014, 11:59:48 AM
Rusty and I are happy to relist this one thank Ringo
Werewolves give: Ben Cunnington
Bunnies give: Luke Dahlhaus
Rusty to confirm
confirmed
Sorry guys but I am sticking to my rulings on this one.
We listed additional movements based on a new scoring scheme so as we are reverting back to the original status quo do not see the need for extra movements. That is one of the reasons for all trades top be cancelled.
If coaches used all their movements as they were warned early then they now have to live by the decision to use all their 10 trades.
My decision is now based on the fact that there will now be no change to our competition so the rules that applied should now continue and that solely is my reason for the rulings.
@Kilbluff if you and memph wish to continue this trade please advise here.
we cant continue with it as i have no movements
So trade can not be completed.
K, so no Gibson, JJ or Mohr.
Yep, my defense is flowered.
Quote from: Ringo on February 21, 2014, 12:10:48 PM
Sorry guys but I am sticking to my rulings on this one.
We listed additional movements based on a new scoring scheme so as we are reverting back to the original status quo do not see the need for extra movements. That is one of the reasons for all trades top be cancelled.
If coaches used all their movements as they were warned early then they now have to live by the decision to use all their 10 trades.
My decision is now based on the fact that there will now be no change to our competition so the rules that applied should now continue and that solely is my reason for the rulings.
@Kilbluff if you and memph wish to continue this trade please advise here.
You talking about Rusty and my trade or to KB?
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 21, 2014, 12:34:15 PM
Quote from: Ringo on February 21, 2014, 12:10:48 PM
Sorry guys but I am sticking to my rulings on this one.
We listed additional movements based on a new scoring scheme so as we are reverting back to the original status quo do not see the need for extra movements. That is one of the reasons for all trades top be cancelled.
If coaches used all their movements as they were warned early then they now have to live by the decision to use all their 10 trades.
My decision is now based on the fact that there will now be no change to our competition so the rules that applied should now continue and that solely is my reason for the rulings.
@Kilbluff if you and memph wish to continue this trade please advise here.
You talking about Rusty and my trade or to KB?
To KB. You guys are fine.
i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 21, 2014, 12:36:14 PM
i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.
There's so much confusion, I don't blame you.
Quote from: NigeyS on February 21, 2014, 12:54:49 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 21, 2014, 12:36:14 PM
i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.
There's so much confusion, I don't blame you.
Let's not complain about it, let's try and help each other through it.
Quote from: elephants on February 21, 2014, 01:04:26 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 21, 2014, 12:54:49 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 21, 2014, 12:36:14 PM
i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.
There's so much confusion, I don't blame you.
Let's not complain about it, let's try and help each other through it.
I'm not complaining? ???
Simply stated there was a bit of confusion.
I can't be helped in any way, shape or form because I've used all my permitted movements as I didn't foresee losing so many numbers in defense and gaining as many mids .
Quote from: NigeyS on February 21, 2014, 01:08:10 PM
Quote from: elephants on February 21, 2014, 01:04:26 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 21, 2014, 12:54:49 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 21, 2014, 12:36:14 PM
i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.
There's so much confusion, I don't blame you.
Let's not complain about it, let's try and help each other through it.
I'm not complaining? ???
Simply stated there was a bit of confusion.
I can't be helped in any way, shape or form because I've used all my permitted movements as I didn't foresee losing so many numbers in defense and gaining as many mids .
Never said you did, just stated that we shouldn't be and instead put our energies into helping out Ringo in this tough time for the comp.
Quote from: elephants on February 21, 2014, 01:10:44 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 21, 2014, 01:08:10 PM
Quote from: elephants on February 21, 2014, 01:04:26 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 21, 2014, 12:54:49 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 21, 2014, 12:36:14 PM
i thought so, but since it was posted directly after ours i wanted to check.
There's so much confusion, I don't blame you.
Let's not complain about it, let's try and help each other through it.
I'm not complaining? ???
Simply stated there was a bit of confusion.
I can't be helped in any way, shape or form because I've used all my permitted movements as I didn't foresee losing so many numbers in defense and gaining as many mids .
Never said you did, just stated that we shouldn't be and instead put our energies into helping out Ringo in this tough time for the comp.
Ah, a misunderstanding! You quoted my post so I figured it was in direct reply to the comment I made.
Nottingham Hoods give : Jesse Lonergan
Bradford Badgers give : Jesse White
Basically I need another forward I can start as I have some very injury prone forwards and not much reliable backup
Whatlez needs some more mids as his mid depth is lacking
Quote from: luvfooty on February 21, 2014, 04:42:04 PM
Nottingham Hoods give : Jesse Lonergan
Bradford Badgers give : Jesse White
Basically I need another forward I can start as I have some very injury prone forwards and not much reliable backup
Whatlez needs some more mids as his mid depth is lacking
Sorry specky but Yolo
Confirmed lol
Quote from: whatlez on February 21, 2014, 04:42:44 PM
Quote from: luvfooty on February 21, 2014, 04:42:04 PM
Nottingham Hoods give : Jesse Lonergan
Bradford Badgers give : Jesse White
Basically I need another forward I can start as I have some very injury prone forwards and not much reliable backup
Whatlez needs some more mids as his mid depth is lacking
Sorry specky but Yolo
Confirmed lol
hahah, oh well,
Seriously that is annoying.
Just wasted a week with trades.
Also are we reverting back to the original scoring system?
Vote said tomorrow night was the deadline?
How many list movements do we have now Ringo?
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 21, 2014, 05:03:46 PM
Seriously that is annoying.
Just wasted a week with trades.
Also are we reverting back to the original scoring system?
Vote said tomorrow night was the deadline?
How many list movements do we have now Ringo?
Ringo posted this in the other thread.
Quote from: Ringo on February 21, 2014, 10:24:16 AM
Please read Carefully and then discuss.
As it is evident with the current vote that we wish to use the Sportal Scoring system (not quite a mjority at this stage with only 10 coaches voted so far) I have mad the following rulings after looking at the approved trades so far.
1. All trades that have been approved as a result of previous announcements have now been cancelled and will have to be renegotiated: Trades 61 - 66 have been marked cancelled in the thread,
2. As we are reverting to our Original scoring system No additional trade movements will now be allowed. Consider this reasonable given that we are now using the same system so all previous trades were made on that basis.
3. Trading will be extended to Wednesday 5th March to allow renegotiation time.
4. Reinforcing that players picked in Rookie and national Draft will count as a trade movement
For information here are the trade movements that are now current:
List Movements
Birmingham Bombers 10
Blackpool Bunnies 5
Bradford Badgers 8
Crosby Cruisers 9
Grope Lane Giants 0
Hastings Hurricanes 7
Hebden Bridge Hedgehogs 4
Huddersfield Hawks 9
Leeds Leeches 3
Liverpool Rams 12
Manchester Magic 5
Newcastle Falcons 10
Nottingham Hoods 6
Oxford Owls 10
Staines Steins 6
Swansea Breakers 8
Swindon Swaggers 6
Winchester Werewolves 7
So Bombers, Rams, Falcons and Owls have utilised all movements and can make no more tardes unless on trading players traded in.
May seem unfair but as we are reverting back to our original rules this should be the rules as well.
Could you all check your team lists in the OP of this thread as these are the lists I have after cancellation of trades:
http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,87321.0.html
The vote was put out, if people vote Option B, we'll be back using Sportal.
What's the ruling then on the new coaches?
Were we allowed any extra movements? Or not? Did we have any extra because of where we finished on the ladder? Or not?
I'm finding it hard to work out this information.
Can you instead list how many list movements clubs have left rather than saying how many they have used. As it's different for a lot of teams due to where the finished on the ladder?
I count that we have one extra movement we can use with anyone? So that's 4 trades with anyone who has list movements left and 1 with anyone we like? Is that correct?
Also FYI if the scoring system is back to the old one then the trade of Seedsman for Shiel and Paine for Sam Reid should be counted as they were two I did for the Cruisers BEFORE the other trade period closed.
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 21, 2014, 05:19:38 PM
What's the ruling then on the new coaches?
Were we allowed any extra movements? Or not? Did we have any extra because of where we finished on the ladder? Or not?
I'm finding it hard to work out this information.
Can you instead list how many list movements clubs have left rather than saying how many they have used. As it's different for a lot of teams due to where the finished on the ladder?
I count that we have one extra movement we can use with anyone? So that's 4 trades with anyone who has list movements left and 1 with anyone we like? Is that correct?
Also FYI if the scoring system is back to the old one then the trade of Seedsman for Shiel and Paine for Sam Reid should be counted as they were two I did for the Cruisers BEFORE the other trade period closed.
You've got 4 left at the Staines.
If I remember correctly, Ringo granted the new coaches three extra movements. Could be wrong though.
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 21, 2014, 05:19:38 PM
What's the ruling then on the new coaches?
Were we allowed any extra movements? Or not? Did we have any extra because of where we finished on the ladder? Or not?
I'm finding it hard to work out this information.
Can you instead list how many list movements clubs have left rather than saying how many they have used. As it's different for a lot of teams due to where the finished on the ladder?
I count that we have one extra movement we can use with anyone? So that's 4 trades with anyone who has list movements left and 1 with anyone we like? Is that correct?
Also FYI if the scoring system is back to the old one then the trade of Seedsman for Shiel and Paine for Sam Reid should be counted as they were two I did for the Cruisers BEFORE the other trade period closed.
Found this post ;)
http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,86557.255.html (http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,86557.255.html)
That is correct, in fairness the Shiel for Seedsman trade has to go through :(
OK will clarify.
We granted new coaches an additional 3 movements due to the circumstances, New coaches may use these three movements to trade with coaches who have no movements left but they must specify at time of trade that this trade is a compensating trade for new coaches.
So according to my records these are the number of movements left per team:
Birmingham Dragons 0
Blackpool Bunnies 5
Bradford Badgers 2
Crosby Cruisers 1
Grope Lane Giants 11
Hastings Hurricanes 3
Hebden Bridge Hedgehogs 6
Huddersfield Hawks 1
Leeds Leeches 7
Liverpool Rams 0
Manchester Magic 5
Newcastle Falcons 0
Nottingham Hoods 7
Oxford Owls 0
Staines Steins 7
Swansea Breakers 2
Swindon Swaggers 4
Winchester Werewolves 6
Sorry for all the confusion but I trust you will bear with me as we get the comp back on track after the confusion with Sporting Systems.
Still have 6 coaches to vote for scoring system so plaease do ASAP.
As always any questions please PM me.
Oh, so Memph can trade with me! :D
Quote from: Ringo on February 21, 2014, 06:06:56 PM
New coaches may use these three movements to trade with coaches who have no movements left but they must specify at time of trade that this trade is a compensating trade for new coaches.
So, if Memph and JB are happy, my trades should stand as:
My trade with JB is on-trading Simpkin
And the other two trades I did with Memph can be combined into one as Johannisen and Mohr for Hrovar and Spencer.
Just need to repost trades if all agree as I cancelled all trades so need to re post.
Quote from: Ringo on February 21, 2014, 06:16:55 PM
Just need to repost trades if all agree as I cancelled all trades so need to re post.
Yep, just confirming with JB and Memph.
Thats what i was talking about earlier Nige ;)
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on February 21, 2014, 06:25:55 PM
Thats what i was talking about earlier Nige ;)
Just sent you and Memph a PM mate, think we've got it sorted. 8)
Someone trade with me! :)
I'm looking for a midfield upgrade on Oliver Wines, willing to add more.
Or a starting defender.
Birmingham Bombers may have 0 movements but Birmingham Dragons still have 10 ? Worth a try :P:X
Scott McMahon in form 8)
Who are Grope Lane and why do they have so many movements...
Nails and its because he's got a shower side and cbf trading.
Quote from: elephants on February 22, 2014, 01:59:34 AM
Nails and its because he's got a shower side and cbf trading.
and never replies
Quote from: Vinny on February 21, 2014, 06:06:50 PM
That is correct, in fairness the Shiel for Seedsman trade has to go through :(
Appreciate that vinny - yes this is confirmed.
Great sportsmanship
No worries man, I confirm too :)
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 22, 2014, 02:05:16 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 22, 2014, 01:59:34 AM
Nails and its because he's got a shower side and cbf trading.
and never replies
also because was lazy and forgot. :P
Quote from: ossie85 on February 22, 2014, 07:59:41 AM
Quote from: Vinny on February 21, 2014, 06:06:50 PM
That is correct, in fairness the Shiel for Seedsman trade has to go through :(
Appreciate that vinny - yes this is confirmed.
Great sportsmanship
So just to clarify
Crosby gives: Paul Seedsman
Oxford gives: Dylan Shiel.
is now confirmed with Crosby using their last movement.
That is correct Ringo, confirmed!
Quote from: Ringo on February 22, 2014, 10:41:11 AM
Quote from: ossie85 on February 22, 2014, 07:59:41 AM
Quote from: Vinny on February 21, 2014, 06:06:50 PM
That is correct, in fairness the Shiel for Seedsman trade has to go through :(
Appreciate that vinny - yes this is confirmed.
Great sportsmanship
So just to clarify
Crosby gives: Paul Seedsman
Oxford gives: Dylan Shiel.
is now confirmed with Crosby using their last movement.
yup :)
Oxford can have Shiel for the current preseason match though!
Dylan Shiel's moved around a bit.
Manchester to Liverpool to Oxford to Crosby. :o
Quote from: NigeyS on February 22, 2014, 03:54:21 PM
Dylan Shiel's moved around a bit.
Manchester to Liverpool to Oxford to Crosby. :o
Lucky Britain's the size of a thimble :P
Quote from: ossie85 on February 22, 2014, 03:58:49 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 22, 2014, 03:54:21 PM
Dylan Shiel's moved around a bit.
Manchester to Liverpool to Oxford to Crosby. :o
Lucky Britain's the size of a thimble :P
Yeah, he's unlucky this isn't Worlds or he'd have racked up plenty of Frequent Flyer miles. :P
Quote from: NigeyS on February 22, 2014, 04:05:56 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on February 22, 2014, 03:58:49 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 22, 2014, 03:54:21 PM
Dylan Shiel's moved around a bit.
Manchester to Liverpool to Oxford to Crosby. :o
Lucky Britain's the size of a thimble :P
Yeah, he's unlucky this isn't Worlds or he'd have racked up plenty of Frequent Flyer miles. :P
If Crosby want to trade him, we'll take him and trade away again :P
Badgers give: Scott McMahon
Hoods give: Clint Jones
Reason: I got 20 backs so I needed some mid depth.
Quote from: whatlez on February 22, 2014, 05:04:44 PM
Badgers give: Scott McMahon
Hoods give: Clint Jones
Reason: I got 20 backs so I needed some mid depth.
Confirmed
Whatlez needed some mid depth and another playing back gives the Hoods some better back depth
Ok so we're going back to the deal with Birmingham Bomberdragons ;P
We are using up 2 of the extra/new coach list movements to do this one. As Hartlett was originally a Dragon trade to us and we're on-trading him then I believe he doesn't count as a list movement in this one.
Steins give: Hartlett+ M Brown (Eagles)+Crisp
Brimingham: Perris+Lester+Michie.
KB to confirm
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 22, 2014, 06:06:36 PM
Ok so we're going back to the deal with Birmingham Bomberdragons ;P
We are using up 2 of the extra/new coach list movements to do this one. As Hartlett was originally a Dragon trade to us and we're on-trading him then I believe he doesn't count as a list movement in this one.
Steins give: Hartlett+ M Brown (Eagles)+Crisp
Brimingham: Perris+Lester+Michie.
KB to confirm
Confirmed we have enough young developing mids to lose these 3 i think they are long term where as Hartlett will be in his prime in a year or two which is when i feel our premiership window begins
If the Hartlett trade goes through i get a movement back i think
so i'm putting Burgoyne on the table again who is an on trade so i can also trade a depth player to, every depth player for sale even Dom Sheed i'd be after a good young forward or defender mostly but will consider anything so Burgoyne + Someone for a gun is what i want
Not as ideal as the other deal but we wanted to save a list movement and we still think this trade is worth it given how many seasons Hunter has left compared with O'Keefe.
Steins give: Ryan O'Keefe
Huddersfield gives: Lachie Hunter
Jbs to confirm.
Confirmed!
Using new coach movement btw Ringo
Same trade as before just reposting because it was cancelled.
Rams give: Jonathan Simpkin
Hawks give: Josh Gibson.
JB to confirm.
Lol what a pathetic trade. Hunter wasn't even rated as second round pick a few years back.
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2014, 02:56:15 PM
Lol what a pathetic trade. Hunter wasn't even rated as second round pick a few years back.
Yes he was he was the #1 SC scorer in the TAC cup.
Quote from: NigeyS on February 23, 2014, 02:55:12 PM
Same trade as before just reposting because it was cancelled.
Rams give: Jonathan Simpkin
Hawks give: Josh Gibson.
JB to confirm.
Confirmed
Yeah, Hunter was rated.
It was said that the Dogs were lucky to get him as a F/S pick at like 46 or whatever because he's definitely better than those you generally get around that pick.
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on February 23, 2014, 03:03:37 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2014, 02:56:15 PM
Lol what a pathetic trade. Hunter wasn't even rated as second round pick a few years back.
Yes he was he was the #1 SC scorer in the TAC cup.
Yes he was he was hahaha. Nice response lol
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2014, 03:05:44 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on February 23, 2014, 03:03:37 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2014, 02:56:15 PM
Lol what a pathetic trade. Hunter wasn't even rated as second round pick a few years back.
Yes he was he was the #1 SC scorer in the TAC cup.
Yes he was he was hahaha. Nice response lol
It lacked a period.
Yea sorry on my phone ;)
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on February 23, 2014, 03:11:52 PM
Yea sorry on my phone ;)
Still made your point well enough for Lez to not be able to respond to it with anything but criticising the lack of punctuation. 8)
I had a good response to it. But I felt paying out his punctuation would be ideal :P
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2014, 03:19:32 PM
I had a good response to it. But I felt paying out his punctuation would be ideal :P
Classic Lez with the cheap shot. :P
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2014, 02:56:15 PM
Lol what a pathetic trade. Hunter wasn't even rated as second round pick a few years back.
Hunter has like 10 years ahead of him and has shown to be a good scorer at whatever level he has played at so far. TAC Cup, VFL last year and the first NAB Challenge match.
It's not unreasonable to think he can continue this at AFL level when his body is ready. Also it looks likely he'll stay a fwd/mid for a while which is very handy.
While, ROK in our opinion only has the one season left. Though JBs will probably be hoping he plays on for another one after that.
As far as we're concerned this is a great deal for us as there is no way we were challenging this season.
The Steins are looking to pick up a playing ruck man as back up to Maric.
Doesn't have to be the best scorer but someone who will play games this season.
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 23, 2014, 11:52:49 PM
The Steins are looking to pick up a playing ruck man as back up to Maric.
Doesn't have to be the best scorer but someone who will play games this season.
I offered Nicholls, but noo
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 23, 2014, 11:52:49 PM
The Steins are looking to pick up a playing ruck man as back up to Maric.
Doesn't have to be the best scorer but someone who will play games this season.
Spencer? :P
Quote from: whatlez on February 23, 2014, 11:59:50 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 23, 2014, 11:52:49 PM
The Steins are looking to pick up a playing ruck man as back up to Maric.
Doesn't have to be the best scorer but someone who will play games this season.
I offered Nicholls, but noo
We'd be interested in Nicholls but not for midfielders where we are quite short. Though now we have a few more then perhaps we could work something out.
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 09:36:14 AM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 23, 2014, 11:52:49 PM
The Steins are looking to pick up a playing ruck man as back up to Maric.
Doesn't have to be the best scorer but someone who will play games this season.
Spencer? :P
I'd still be keen on the Mohr for Spencer deal. Though that means canning our other one involving JJ and Hrovat.
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 01:15:37 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 09:36:14 AM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 23, 2014, 11:52:49 PM
The Steins are looking to pick up a playing ruck man as back up to Maric.
Doesn't have to be the best scorer but someone who will play games this season.
Spencer? :P
I'd still be keen on the Mohr for Spencer deal. Though that means canning our other one involving JJ and Hrovat.
I'd probably prefer JJ over Mohr.
JJ for Spencer?
Werewolves give Majak Daw
Owls give Trop Chaplin
Owls were after some ruck depth whilst some defensive depth wouldn't go astray for us.
Vinny to confirm.
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 01:24:02 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 01:15:37 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 09:36:14 AM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 23, 2014, 11:52:49 PM
The Steins are looking to pick up a playing ruck man as back up to Maric.
Doesn't have to be the best scorer but someone who will play games this season.
Spencer? :P
I'd still be keen on the Mohr for Spencer deal. Though that means canning our other one involving JJ and Hrovat.
I'd probably prefer JJ over Mohr.
JJ for Spencer?
Nah sorry, prefer Mohr.
After chatting with the co-coach we think we could actuallly put this one again if you like? The first and second trade to be sorted without a PM ;)
Quote from: Rusty00 on February 24, 2014, 01:35:43 PM
Werewolves give Majak Daw
Owls give Trop Chaplin
Owls were after some ruck depth whilst some defensive depth wouldn't go astray for us.
Vinny to confirm.
Confirmed :)
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 02:07:07 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 01:24:02 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 01:15:37 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 09:36:14 AM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 23, 2014, 11:52:49 PM
The Steins are looking to pick up a playing ruck man as back up to Maric.
Doesn't have to be the best scorer but someone who will play games this season.
Spencer? :P
I'd still be keen on the Mohr for Spencer deal. Though that means canning our other one involving JJ and Hrovat.
I'd probably prefer JJ over Mohr.
JJ for Spencer?
Nah sorry, prefer Mohr.
After chatting with the co-coach we think we could actuallly put this one again if you like? The first and second trade to be sorted without a PM ;)
Eh, at this point... I'll take it because I just need the depth. :P
Rams give: Jake Spencer
Steins give: Tim Mohr
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 02:39:25 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 02:07:07 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 01:24:02 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 01:15:37 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 09:36:14 AM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 23, 2014, 11:52:49 PM
The Steins are looking to pick up a playing ruck man as back up to Maric.
Doesn't have to be the best scorer but someone who will play games this season.
Spencer? :P
I'd still be keen on the Mohr for Spencer deal. Though that means canning our other one involving JJ and Hrovat.
I'd probably prefer JJ over Mohr.
JJ for Spencer?
Nah sorry, prefer Mohr.
After chatting with the co-coach we think we could actuallly put this one again if you like? The first and second trade to be sorted without a PM ;)
Eh, at this point... I'll take it because I just need the depth. :P
Rams give: Jake Spencer
Steins give: Tim Mohr
Confirm. Does this need to be an extra movement Nigey or did you have some left?
If so then I believe we have one extra that we are able to use due to finishing 13th on the ladder.
I can't see that it was used by the previous coach.
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 02:46:15 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 02:39:25 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 02:07:07 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 01:24:02 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 01:15:37 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 09:36:14 AM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 23, 2014, 11:52:49 PM
The Steins are looking to pick up a playing ruck man as back up to Maric.
Doesn't have to be the best scorer but someone who will play games this season.
Spencer? :P
I'd still be keen on the Mohr for Spencer deal. Though that means canning our other one involving JJ and Hrovat.
I'd probably prefer JJ over Mohr.
JJ for Spencer?
Nah sorry, prefer Mohr.
After chatting with the co-coach we think we could actuallly put this one again if you like? The first and second trade to be sorted without a PM ;)
Eh, at this point... I'll take it because I just need the depth. :P
Rams give: Jake Spencer
Steins give: Tim Mohr
Confirm. Does this need to be an extra movement Nigey or did you have some left?
I have none.
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 02:47:21 PM
If so then I believe we have one extra that we are able to use due to finishing 13th on the ladder.
I can't see that it was used by the previous coach.
no only 14th-18th got extra movements
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 24, 2014, 02:57:35 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 02:47:21 PM
If so then I believe we have one extra that we are able to use due to finishing 13th on the ladder.
I can't see that it was used by the previous coach.
no only 14th-18th got extra movements
From the rules thread:
5.7 There will be two trade periods per season, one before the drafts, and one after. Teams are entitled to 10 Player movements over the 2 trade periods. Teams finishing 17th and 18th are allowed an additional 2 player movements and reams finishing
13 - 16 are entitled to one additional player movement. These additional player movements must be nominated and will not count as player movements for the franchise being traded with.
Oh i thought Leeches were the highest team to get them
Sweet, so our trade stands and can be done. 8)
hey Ringo
should the Dragons now have 1 movement left since we got Hartlett back?
All right guys just a reminder that all trades have now been ruled upon in the OP. Pl;ease let me know if I have missed any but I think I have got them all from the banter and discussions.
Will be updating Team list with approved trades in the next few days.
@kilbluff too quick for me as I had not checked back to original lists but can confirm you now have 1 movement back as Hartlett on your original list.
Lol sorry mate should have checked the edit time
Cheers
Also bear in mind that trade period will finish at midnight on Wednesday. so 56 hours of trading left
Ivan Maric out for 6-8 .. Surgery to remove bone spurs from ankle .. Big blow
Thank you Nigey for Jake "Number One Ruck" Spencer.
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 05:59:40 PM
Ivan Maric out for 6-8 .. Surgery to remove bone spurs from ankle .. Big blow
Thank you Nigey for Jake "Number One Ruck" Spencer.
You're welcome. ;D
According to MTTY, he's actually a good chance to play for the Dees. :o
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 06:01:10 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 05:59:40 PM
Ivan Maric out for 6-8 .. Surgery to remove bone spurs from ankle .. Big blow
Thank you Nigey for Jake "Number One Ruck" Spencer.
You're welcome. ;D
According to MTTY, he's actually a good chance to play for the Dees. :o
According to my Melbourne supporting co-coach he is too :D
Though probably not a great scorer.
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 06:55:19 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 24, 2014, 06:01:10 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 24, 2014, 05:59:40 PM
Ivan Maric out for 6-8 .. Surgery to remove bone spurs from ankle .. Big blow
Thank you Nigey for Jake "Number One Ruck" Spencer.
You're welcome. ;D
According to MTTY, he's actually a good chance to play for the Dees. :o
According to my Melbourne supporting co-coach he is too :D
Though probably not a great scorer.
Probably better than an OOP player though. ;)
Alright we're entering the last few days of trading and we still have 4 movements to use (with clubs who have movements left themselves).
Who wants to trade?
Anyone but Jack could be available for the right price.
memph put up a list categorizing your list like on the 1st page of the other trade thread and say what position your after etc
and Burgoyne still for sale
Good idea KB.
Here we go:
Staines Steins
FUTURE DELISTMENTS - May be traded as sweeteners
Ben Rutten, Lewis-Roberts Thompson, Ben Rutten, Tom Lonergan, Ciaran Byrne, Angus Graham
ON THE TRADE TABLE - Looking to trade this player for a fair deal
Ricky Henderson, Jason Johannisen, Dan Nicholson, Marty Clarke, Brodie Martin, Tendai Mzungu, Ryan Crowley, Jarryd Cachia, Nathan Gordon, Alex Greenwood, Sam Naismith, Max Ring (rookie), Nathan Bock, Kristian Jaksch, Beau Maister, Lewis Jetta, Matt Spangher, Malcom Karpany, Louis Herbert (rookie)
DESIRED PLAYERS - Will require a decent offer to entice trade
Dean Terlich, Nathan Grima, Lee Spurr, Lachie Hunter, Ryan Lester, Viv Michie, Harry Cunningham, Brandon Jack, Jed Anderson, Ivan Maric, Jake Spencer, Jamie Elliott, Josh Jenkins,
KEEPERS - Not available for trade barring a massive offer
Kieran Jack, Lloyd Perris, Kurt Tippett, Josh Kelly, Jesse Hogan,
POSITIONS BEING TARGETED
Playing rucks and young midfielders and young forwards.
Nottingham Hoods give: Courtney Dempsey
Birmingham Dragons give: Dom Sheed
After going though players positions on my list I discovered a few players in wrong position which then gave me quite a few defenders and I lost a few midfielders so this trade give me back a mid
KB to confirm
Quote from: luvfooty on February 25, 2014, 02:19:27 PM
Nottingham Hoods give: Courtney Dempsey
Birmingham Dragons give: Dom Sheed
After going though players positions on my list I discovered a few players in wrong position which then gave me quite a few defenders and I lost a few midfielders so this trade give me back a mid
KB to confirm
Confirmed we already have a gun young midfield I feel this is a good trade for the teams premiership chances in a year or two
Quote from: luvfooty on February 25, 2014, 02:19:27 PM
Nottingham Hoods give: Courtney Dempsey
Birmingham Dragons give: Dom Sheed
After going though players positions on my list I discovered a few players in wrong position which then gave me quite a few defenders and I lost a few midfielders so this trade give me back a mid
KB to confirm
Probably could have got something better than Dempsey for Sheed from us KB.
Really annoys me when teams suggest a possible trade then say no we've got another offer and don't give the original team a chance to match/beat the other offer.
Seems like common sense that you should try get the best deal possible for your player.
Besides Jack and the injured Hendo there is no one in your list I'd rather then Dempsey
Dylan Roberton could move for the right forward
Love how you start the trade period going youth then end the trade period bringing back oldies kb :P
26 isnt old
Post your Best XV in your team thread again KB :)
Quote from: Vinny on February 25, 2014, 06:31:25 PM
Post your Best XV in your team thread again KB :)
why?
I just wanna see what it looks, it's outdated in your thread. You've made some nice trades since, haha?
Grope Lane trade: Elliot Yeo + Alexis Georgiou
Memph's team trade: Jason Johannisen + Louis Hebert.
Quote from: Nails on February 25, 2014, 11:55:52 PM
Grope Lane trade: Elliot Yeo + Alexis Georgiou
Memph's team trade: Jason Johannisen + Louis Hebert.
Confirm.
Nice doing business with you Nails :)
Quote from: Memphistopheles on February 25, 2014, 11:58:51 PM
Quote from: Nails on February 25, 2014, 11:55:52 PM
Grope Lane trade: Elliot Yeo + Alexis Georgiou
Memph's team trade: Jason Johannisen + Louis Hebert.
Confirm.
Nice doing business with you Nails :)
easiest trade I've ever done in any XVs comp
hi we like these players from your team
cool i like these players from yours
so these two for these two?
"yep"
JASON JOHAN!
This kid will be #1 defender in 3 seasons :D
Jason is an uncontested player
Quote from: Nails on February 26, 2014, 12:05:36 AM
Quote from: whatlez on February 26, 2014, 12:04:48 AM
Jason is an uncontested player
wut u mean?
This comp rewards players that win their own ball, JJ is a good player but he's not one of these lads.
Quote from: elephants on February 26, 2014, 12:10:28 AM
Quote from: Nails on February 26, 2014, 12:05:36 AM
Quote from: whatlez on February 26, 2014, 12:04:48 AM
Jason is an uncontested player
wut u mean?
This comp rewards players that win their own ball, JJ is a good player but he's not one of these lads.
To be honest we think Yeo will be on a similar level as JJ. But, the fact that he is a bit further ahead in his development and a likely best 22 player this season whereas JJ's spot is still uncertain (at least till Bob Murphy retires) swayed us.
I think it's a pretty fair trade. Georgiou and Herbert are both unknown quantities at the moment - Nails happened to like Herbert and we happened to like G.
Oh I'm not debating the trade man, just elaborating on what Lez said ;)
tbh thought we were combining DT/SC when I put that trade through 5 minutes ago as that was the last communication I had received on what scoring system we would use ::)
I'd put Johan in the same type of player as Murphy and Murphy scores fine. Johan does get contested possies too
Was also putting out some pretty good numbers towards the end. Johan averaged 73 something with his injury sub game included. He's a gun to be.
And Herbert gun too.
@ Memph - I'd say JJ is ahead of Yeo tbh. JJ was a lock in his best 22 playing like all games possible until season ender. He's a gun
Quote from: Nails on February 26, 2014, 12:17:44 AM
tbh thought we were combining DT/SC when I put that trade through 5 minutes ago as that was the last communication I had received on what scoring system we would use ::)
I'd put Johan in the same type of player as Murphy and Murphy scores fine. Johan does get contested possies too
Was also putting out some pretty good numbers towards the end. Johan averaged 73 something with his injury sub game included. He's a gun to be.
And Herbert gun too.
@ Memph - I'd say JJ is ahead of Yeo tbh. JJ was a lock in his best 22 playing like all games possible until season ender. He's a gun
We'll see mate :P Yeo seems to be a certain starter for West Coast. Never been the greatest scorer in his career so far though which is the main issue.
Quote from: Nails on February 26, 2014, 12:17:44 AM
tbh thought we were combining DT/SC when I put that trade through 5 minutes ago as that was the last communication I had received on what scoring system we would use ::)
I'd put Johan in the same type of player as Murphy and Murphy scores fine. Johan does get contested possies too
Was also putting out some pretty good numbers towards the end. Johan averaged 73 something with his injury sub game included. He's a gun to be.
And Herbert gun too.
@ Memph - I'd say JJ is ahead of Yeo tbh. JJ was a lock in his best 22 playing like all games possible until season ender. He's a gun
lol, assumed that was the case. How about you check the BXV boards once in a while then..? ::)
Quote from: elephants on February 26, 2014, 12:24:55 AM
Quote from: Nails on February 26, 2014, 12:17:44 AM
tbh thought we were combining DT/SC when I put that trade through 5 minutes ago as that was the last communication I had received on what scoring system we would use ::)
I'd put Johan in the same type of player as Murphy and Murphy scores fine. Johan does get contested possies too
Was also putting out some pretty good numbers towards the end. Johan averaged 73 something with his injury sub game included. He's a gun to be.
And Herbert gun too.
@ Memph - I'd say JJ is ahead of Yeo tbh. JJ was a lock in his best 22 playing like all games possible until season ender. He's a gun
lol, assumed that was the case. How about you check the BXV boards once in a while then..? ::)
I'd have made the trade whether it was the case or wasn't. Johan 6ppg average better and including his showerty sub injury game. I also rate Johan as you'll notice I have him in another FF XVs team and pretty sure I have him in AXVIIIs too and also attempted to acquire him in the other XVs comps
It's the first and only trade I've made in BXVs and purely for the fact Johannisen was involved.
I know :( I asked about JJ today but Memph didn't get back to me! How could I compete with a new Eagle in Yeo anyway haha
Quote from: elephants on February 26, 2014, 12:31:22 AM
I know :( I asked about JJ today but Memph didn't get back to me! How could I compete with a new Eagle in Yeo anyway haha
You couldn't :P
Point is, sportal is for the contested guys. JJ is uncontested nut. But doesn't get the hard ball often.
Yeo only averages 1.4 contested possies per game more than Yeo (3.8 vs. 5.2) which isn't enough to write off the fact JJ gets more of the pill and more point racking up statistics.
Also it'd be less of a lead if you took out JJ's injury game.
JJ is the best player in the AFL.
I don't give a shower about Yeo. Very overrated IMO.
Great banter guys - sticking to the facts and no personal attacks. Keep it going.
Yeo is a gun player, verdict still out on fantasy relevance
From the Lions perspective i rate the young backs (including those have left as follows)
Golby, Yeo, Harwood, Clarke and Docherty for what it is worth.
Quote from: Nails on February 26, 2014, 01:13:49 AM
JJ is the best player in the AFL.
He's your new Bradd "Razzle Dazzle" Dalziell? :P
Quote from: Nails on February 26, 2014, 01:13:49 AM
JJ is the best player in the AFL.
Hahaha sure he is ;) :D :P
If by JJ you mean GA then yes
(http://i.imgur.com/Oocz3sy.png)
If only you dedicated as much time to your XVs teams over the off-season/pre-season as you did with this picture. :P
Quote from: NigeyS on February 26, 2014, 12:26:42 PM
If only you dedicated as much time to your XVs teams over the off-season/pre-season as you did with this picture. :P
Or reading PMs...
Quote from: ossie85 on February 26, 2014, 12:28:23 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on February 26, 2014, 12:26:42 PM
If only you dedicated as much time to your XVs teams over the off-season/pre-season as you did with this picture. :P
Or reading PMs...
Seems to not mind sending them... :o
Feel free to re-send any PMs I need to reply to... thought I was up to date
TBH I thought DT was like a month+ away. I ain't done any research I need to get my shower sorted.
Quote from: Nails on February 26, 2014, 12:32:56 PM
Feel free to re-send any PMs I need to reply to... thought I was up to date
TBH I thought DT was like a month+ away. I ain't done any research I need to get my shower sorted.
WXV rule votes and elxam leagues entering (must've been quite a few of those)
SC Elxam League too Nails please.
Does the trade period end tonight?
Does anyone at all want to trade another ruckman?
Or a young playing midfielder?
We still have a few list movements left to use.
Trade period does end at midnight tonight (Real Time not funny time) so 12 and a bit hours left real time now 11:45am
Quote from: Ringo on February 26, 2014, 12:44:00 PM
Trade period does end at midnight tonight (Real Time not funny time) so 12 and a bit hours left real time now 11:45am
To me that's funny time :P
Only 9.47am here #WALad #WestIsBest
Do you have any list movements left Ringo?
Fancy trading us Max Gawn? Coupled with Spencer that could be the ruck back-up we need.
Send to pm to nrich but with Lobbe as No 1 ruck doubftful afetr last night.
Want midfielders, will trade backs and forwards. Please hit me up I do you good deal 8)
Give us a gun forward and il give you a mediocre mid? :)
Still after a forward
Walker,Taylor,Pendles,Hannebery,Masten,Gray are not up for trade at all
We could possible trade Jamie Elliott or Lewis Jetta if anyone is interested.
We really would like a good, young midfielder in return though. Possibly a ruck depending on who they are.
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on February 26, 2014, 01:52:29 PM
Give us a gun forward and il give you a mediocre mid? :)
(http://www.vizsec2011.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/2562354-HowAboutNoMeme.jpg)
Quote from: luvfooty on February 26, 2014, 01:53:28 PM
Still after a forward
Walker,Taylor,Pendles,Hannebery,Masten,Gray are not up for trade at all
What does that leave? :P
Like I'm going to trade anyone my best players leaving myself to field a spud :P
Some of your good players will have to be let go to make good trades to get better players. No one will take spuds for premiums. ;)
Not even Vinny :P
What so i can get smashed by strengthening other peoples teams and weaking mine
I offered a decent back in Roberton no one wants him
Haha I don't what your're saying.
Not even Vinny as in not even I would take spuds for premiums in that case. Yeah not even I'd do that hahah.
If your disagreeing and saying that you are that good of a trader, shut up. ;)
Quote from: luvfooty on February 26, 2014, 09:13:07 PM
What so i can get smashed by strengthening other peoples teams and weaking mine
I offered a decent back in Roberton no one wants him
I haven't got anything decent to on-trade. :P
Quote from: Vinny on February 26, 2014, 09:14:00 PM
Haha I don't what your're saying.
Not even Vinny as in not even I would take spuds for premiums in that case. Yeah not even I'd do that hahah.
If your disagreeing and saying that you are that good of a trader, shut up. ;)
Haha dont read to much into, meant nothing in it just having a joke ;)
Quote from: luvfooty on February 26, 2014, 09:13:07 PM
What so i can get smashed by strengthening other peoples teams and weaking mine
I offered a decent back in Roberton no one wants him
You don't have to get smashed, haha. Although I got smashed in my first few trades badly.. :-[
Quote from: Vinny on February 26, 2014, 09:14:00 PM
Haha I don't what your're saying.
Not even Vinny as in not even I would take spuds for premiums in that case. Yeah not even I'd do that hahah.
If your disagreeing and saying that you are that good of a trader, shut up. ;)
I dont want a premo i want a playing forward never asked for a premo forward
Vinny would take spud Murphy for Steven
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on February 26, 2014, 09:17:11 PM
Quote from: Vinny on February 26, 2014, 09:14:00 PM
Haha I don't what your're saying.
Not even Vinny as in not even I would take spuds for premiums in that case. Yeah not even I'd do that hahah.
If your disagreeing and saying that you are that good of a trader, shut up. ;)
Haha dont read to much into, meant nothing in it just having a joke ;)
Hahah good to see some of us are still keen on having fun around here!
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 26, 2014, 09:18:17 PM
Vinny would take spud Murphy for Steven
I actually wouldn't.. :P
Quote from: luvfooty on February 26, 2014, 09:17:45 PM
Quote from: Vinny on February 26, 2014, 09:14:00 PM
Haha I don't what your're saying.
Not even Vinny as in not even I would take spuds for premiums in that case. Yeah not even I'd do that hahah.
If your disagreeing and saying that you are that good of a trader, shut up. ;)
I dont want a premo i want a playing forward never asked for a premo forward
Haha never said you did LF.
Just be careful guys do not get into attacking a person just because they can not accommodate trades you desire. This thraed has been reasonable for a while but has gone a little down hill in the last hour or so.
Know trading end getting near but you need to respect decisions of coaches regarding trades.
Quote from: Ringo on February 26, 2014, 09:29:33 PM
Just be careful guys do not get into attacking a person just because they can not accommodate trades you desire. This thraed has been reasonable for a while but has gone a little down hill in the last hour or so.
Know trading end getting near but you need to respect decisions of coaches regarding trades.
I think everything in the last hour has been said in good spirit....
Not sure what you are referring to Ringo, I don't think anyone is being serious haha. :P
Nothing malicious going on at all. :o
Quote from: Ringo on February 26, 2014, 09:29:33 PM
Just be careful guys do not get into attacking a person just because they can not accommodate trades you desire. This thraed has been reasonable for a while but has gone a little down hill in the last hour or so.
Know trading end getting near but you need to respect decisions of coaches regarding trades.
Ringo I feel you struggle to feel what is personal attacks and what isn't. Its not often in British we get personal and in this instance we werent even close.
Just think some of the comments directed at LF may be a little uncalled for that is all.
I would like to debase all your mothers
#belowthebelt
#showergotpersonal
#dontflowerwithme
I'm about to personally attack Vin if he doesn't reply to my PM though :P
Haha come on Ringo I wasn't serious about anything I said to LF, I was actually trying to encourage her to trade. Loosen up boss ;)
I replied ages ago Ele, hahaha. Check again :P
Quote from: Ringo on February 26, 2014, 09:49:14 PM
Just think some of the comments directed at LF may be a little uncalled for that is all.
I wouldn't think so. But if so then maybe we can't have banter.
My bad Vinward :P
Apologise may be an over reaction but can understand the reaction from LF in that she listed who was not for trade and then said she wanted a playing forward possibly for Roberton. And then we had the banter about spuds for premiums so I accept then it was in jest but thought it was directed LF because she would not trade a premium.
;D