Starting this topic for the coming year.
Temember to give reasons why selecting one over the other to assist.
There have been a couple of posts in the archive which I will quote here:
Quote from: elephants on Today at 10:10:39 AM
Treloar. Tom Mitchell or Jack Macrae
Reply from Crowls
Macrea, mitchell has to prove he is back to same level. Treloar not at same level as either.
I'd agree, safe bet is with Macrae after the last two seasons. Mitchell should be cheaper after the year out but does carry more risk and I'm the risk averse type :P.
Defenders:
Daniel & Laird
Vs
Williams & Sicily
Quote from: dmac07 on January 07, 2020, 08:18:33 PM
Defenders:
Daniel & Laird
Vs
Williams & Sicily
Daniels and Laird
You know what their roles will be and they rarely miss games
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)
Quote from: Corkascrew on January 08, 2020, 01:03:11 PM
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)
Mitchell & Greenwood for me.
To be honest though that is 100% a toss up and could go either way.
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 08, 2020, 03:14:12 PM
Quote from: Corkascrew on January 08, 2020, 01:03:11 PM
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)
Mitchell & Greenwood for me.
To be honest though that is 100% a toss up and could go either way.
Close call, id go neale and smith. Though watch how both Mitchell and Smith look pre-season.
Quote from: dmac07 on January 09, 2020, 11:07:25 AM
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 08, 2020, 03:14:12 PM
Quote from: Corkascrew on January 08, 2020, 01:03:11 PM
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)
Mitchell & Greenwood for me.
To be honest though that is 100% a toss up and could go either way.
Close call, id go neale and smith. Though watch how both Mitchell and Smith look pre-season.
Neale and Smith and look to upgrade Mitchell in later. 2 x past keepers vs 1.
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Quote from: frenzy on January 21, 2020, 04:51:53 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.
*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!
Quote from: Bones Bombers on January 21, 2020, 07:29:54 PM
Quote from: frenzy on January 21, 2020, 04:51:53 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.
*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!
Would IMO be a massive risk to start Titch at $631k. Unless he tears it to shreds in the practise matches I am not touching him.
Will be an upgrade option if he looks the goods in the early stages of the season.
Ash/Anderson & Gawn
V
Yeo/Oliver & NicNat
Quote from: AaronKirk on January 21, 2020, 08:04:44 PM
Quote from: Bones Bombers on January 21, 2020, 07:29:54 PM
Quote from: frenzy on January 21, 2020, 04:51:53 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.
*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!
Would IMO be a massive risk to start Titch at $631k. Unless he tears it to shreds in the practise matches I am not touching him.
Will be an upgrade option if he looks the goods in the early stages of the season.
with you on this ak. for me it will be danger vs neale and cash will probably be the decider.
Quote from: crowls on January 21, 2020, 11:49:04 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on January 21, 2020, 08:04:44 PM
Quote from: Bones Bombers on January 21, 2020, 07:29:54 PM
Quote from: frenzy on January 21, 2020, 04:51:53 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.
*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!
Would IMO be a massive risk to start Titch at $631k. Unless he tears it to shreds in the practise matches I am not touching him.
Will be an upgrade option if he looks the goods in the early stages of the season.
with you on this ak. for me it will be danger vs neale and cash will probably be the decider.
Thanks boys.
Titchell was the only risky pick I was taking apart from Doc, but everybody will start him. Even Nat Fyfe comes with risk. A full season outta him would be a first.
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
Quote from: IntegralX on January 22, 2020, 02:00:25 PM
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
I like Coniglio and Laird. But like Olivier/Laird out of the above two.
Gawn/Jelwood/Doedee
vs
Jacobs/Zerrett/Sicily
Quote from: IntegralX on January 22, 2020, 02:00:25 PM
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
Oliver & Laird. I'm not a huge fan of Cogs with their plethora of midfield options
Quote from: IntegralX on January 22, 2020, 02:00:25 PM
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
Oliver & Laird
(Because of Oliver)
Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...
Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger
Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver
Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1
Quote from: Edgeovertherest on January 26, 2020, 01:34:07 AM
Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...
Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger
Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver
Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1
Option 3: Macrae, Neale, Cripps, Danger, Oliver
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on January 26, 2020, 01:57:40 AM
Quote from: Edgeovertherest on January 26, 2020, 01:34:07 AM
Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...
Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger
Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver
Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1
Option 3: Macrae, Neale, Cripps, Danger, Oliver
Interesting... would like to know what you like about cripps, danger and oliver (macrae and neale I understand) vs Fyfe, Kelly, Dunkley and Titch. Injury worries maybe?
Titch has only just started running recently from what I gather and didn't take part in the match sim this week. Would not be planning for him round 1.
Neale & Steven
Vs
Sloane & Greenwood
Quote from: jvalles69 on January 29, 2020, 06:10:42 PM
Neale & Steven
Vs
Sloane & Greenwood
Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.
Walters v heeney
Quote from: eaglesman on January 30, 2020, 12:13:16 AM
Walters v heeney
I'm dealing with the same question. Right now I have Heeney, partly because of price. I am not at all confident this is the right decision!
I can't believe I'm saying it but Greene is worth a look for ~500k F3s too
Quote from: dylanclements on January 30, 2020, 11:36:58 AM
Quote from: eaglesman on January 30, 2020, 12:13:16 AM
Walters v heeney
I'm dealing with the same question. Right now I have Heeney, partly because of price. I am not at all confident this is the right decision!
I can't believe I'm saying it but Greene is worth a look for ~500k F3s too
I'd be going Greenwood ahead of those 3 personally.
Quote from: tommy10 on January 29, 2020, 07:47:41 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on January 29, 2020, 06:10:42 PM
Neale & Steven
Vs
Sloane & Greenwood
Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.
Got Dev at F4 already.
Quote from: SilverLion on January 30, 2020, 12:10:38 PM
I'd be going Greenwood ahead of those 3 personally.
I don't love this one personally. Greenwood has averaged 85 in his three seasons and managed to break 100 three times last season. True that more time in the guts could help him but the upside surely isn't huge and I'd be predicting pretty close to 85 again.
Greene averaged 94, finishing last season with six straight 100s, two of which were over 130.
Heeney averaged 94, finishing last season with 5 100s from his last 9.
I'm going with if I remember Holz's theory that someone who scores well staying on the park is a better gamble than someone who scores less well lifting their numbers. Even if Greenwood adds 10ppg, he is just even with Greene and Heeney.
QuoteI'm going with if I remember Holz's theory that someone who scores well staying on the park is a better gamble than someone who scores less well lifting their numbers. Even if Greenwood adds 10ppg, he is just even with Greene and Heeney.
Gotta take into account what you can do with the extra money though. Greene and Heeney require paying full price, if Greenwood does score on par with those guys then you are saving a tonne of cash. Don't forget Greene misses games and Heeney tends to get small freak injuries that always make him a bit proppy. Prefer Heeney and Greene as upgrade targets.
Quote from: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 02:19:07 PM
QuoteI'm going with if I remember Holz's theory that someone who scores well staying on the park is a better gamble than someone who scores less well lifting their numbers. Even if Greenwood adds 10ppg, he is just even with Greene and Heeney.
Gotta take into account what you can do with the extra money though. Greene and Heeney require paying full price, if Greenwood does score on par with those guys then you are saving a tonne of cash. Don't forget Greene misses games and Heeney tends to get small freak injuries that always make him a bit proppy. Prefer Heeney and Greene as upgrade targets.
Definitely agree about the risk on Greene. By starting him you're gambling on him staying on the park and his history is weak.
Not sure entirely that it matters much about Heeney's niggles. It's true that he gets them but his numbers stack up well to Greenwood's even with the niggles. If anything you're betting on him overcoming them and lifting his average.
I agree in theory about the cash, but you have to remember Greenwood is 465ish, which isn't really dirt cheap - we're talking about 50k or so less than Heeney/Greene. You can see Greenwood tipping 500 at various points but I wouldn't be surprised if he hovers around the 470 mark
"Not sure entirely that it matters much about Heeney's niggles. It's true that he gets them but his numbers stack up well to Greenwood's even with the niggles. If anything you're betting on him overcoming them and lifting his average."
I do think Heeney will make another jump in production at some stage, could be this year, but can't go him over Whits and Dusty and having Heeney at F3 just messes with structure.
Quote from: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 02:58:39 PM
I do think Heeney will make another jump in production at some stage, could be this year, but can't go him over Whits and Dusty and having Heeney at F3 just messes with structure.
The structure problem is real. I have those two and Heeney at f3 right now. I'm not comfortable with it. But I really don't like the fwd mid price options at all, and taking two fwd prems and rookies into rd 1 would be a big call.
With that said I have 4 def prems (including Doc) and Sauce in the ruck, which surely isn't the right structure either. Lots of drafts to come ahead of rd 1 yet!
QuoteWith that said I have 4 def prems (including Doc) and Sauce in the ruck, which surely isn't the right structure either. Lots of drafts to come ahead of rd 1 yet!
There will be sacrifices somewhere whichever way you go. 4 defender premos is a lot, that tends to be the line that burns me the most when I pay up.
Quote from: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 05:43:30 PM
QuoteWith that said I have 4 def prems (including Doc) and Sauce in the ruck, which surely isn't the right structure either. Lots of drafts to come ahead of rd 1 yet!
There will be sacrifices somewhere whichever way you go. 4 defender premos is a lot, that tends to be the line that burns me the most when I pay up.
"burns me the most when I pay up" wise words jv, laird sicily and doc as much as i am willing to pay for def prem's.
J.Steven/D.Smith and Roberton
V
Heeney and Rookie (Brander/Mclennan etc).
Laird(d)Bonar(f) v J Stephen(f)/Young(d)
Strengthens the depth of the backline with hill at D5. Have Bonnar at F4 though.
Quote from: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 12:17:07 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on January 29, 2020, 07:47:41 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on January 29, 2020, 06:10:42 PM
Neale & Steven
Vs
Sloane & Greenwood
Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.
Got Dev at F4 already.
Neale & Steven depending what happens with the calf closer to Rd 1
Grundy & Brander (F6) vs English & D.Smith
Quote from: hawkboy80 on February 06, 2020, 03:43:40 PM
Grundy & Brander (F6) vs English & D.Smith
Grundy and donut if you have to... ;D
Lloyd vs Whitfield
Wanna start both, can only start one, but which one.
Quote from: frenzy on February 12, 2020, 09:07:15 PM
Lloyd vs Whitfield
Wanna start both, can only start one, but which one.
I’d go Whitfield. Forwards seem to have very few options this year, wouldn’t not start one of the top forward locks.
Defenders there’s a few more options such as Sicily, laird, Houston, Stewart etc. so can get away without Lloyd and upgrade later without a huge risk.
Quote from: walloo44 on February 12, 2020, 09:13:28 PM
Quote from: frenzy on February 12, 2020, 09:07:15 PM
Lloyd vs Whitfield
Wanna start both, can only start one, but which one.
I’d go Whitfield. Forwards seem to have very few options this year, wouldn’t not start one of the top forward locks.
Defenders there’s a few more options such as Sicily, laird, Houston, Stewart etc. so can get away without Lloyd and upgrade later without a huge risk.
yep agree, thank you.
Dan "Midfield Lock" Houston vs. Jordan Dawson
Quote from: SilverLion on February 13, 2020, 11:48:00 AM
Dan "Midfield Lock" Houston vs. Jordan Dawson
Tough one, but I would say Houston just because of Wines missing a few weeks with Houston tipped to fill that spot.
Coniglio v Zerrett v TKelly
Jacobs and Hannebery vs Gawn and rookie under 150 k ( not pickett or cockortwo )
Quote from: sidvicious on February 13, 2020, 11:08:30 PM
Jacobs and Hannebery vs Gawn and rookie under 150 k ( not pickett or cockortwo )
Gawn and rookie. 1 keeper vs none
Houston or Sicily
Quote from: LordSneeze on February 14, 2020, 12:08:06 PM
Quote from: walloo44 on February 14, 2020, 12:03:07 PM
Houston or Sicily
Sicily
Based on risk v reward Sicily. Proven scoring ability, plenty of fwd and def depth at Hawks to free him up for rebounding. Houston has the potential to score same or outscore Sicily if he plays high mid TOG, so probably more upside to him. Comes down to team balance and personal risk threshold.
Final 2 Premo Mid Spot.
Titch vs. Oliver vs. TKelly
Rest of the mids are .... Crippa/Bonts/Neale/ ?? / ?? /Narkle/Rowell/Pickett (McHenry/Mead/Close)
If TKelly is chosen i can change Heeney to Whitfield which is bloody tempting
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 27, 2020, 11:34:22 PM
Final 2 Premo Mid Spot.
Titch vs. Oliver vs. TKelly
Rest of the mids are .... Crippa/Bonts/Neale/ ?? / ?? /Narkle/Rowell/Pickett (McHenry/Mead/Close)
If TKelly is chosen i can change Heeney to Whitfield which is bloody tempting
Titch.
Team won’t let Kelly run free. He was waltzing through packs and let go tonight.
sicily (D2) + hannebery (M5) + rookie (M8)
vs
Neale (M1) + 2 high rookies (D5, M7)
Quote from: wizlad on February 28, 2020, 12:14:32 AM
sicily (D2) + hannebery (M5) + rookie (M8)
vs
Neale (M1) + 2 high rookies (D5, M7)
Neale
Quote from: crowls on February 21, 2020, 04:03:30 PM
Quote from: LordSneeze on February 14, 2020, 12:08:06 PM
Quote from: walloo44 on February 14, 2020, 12:03:07 PM
Houston or Sicily
Sicily
Based on risk v reward Sicily. Proven scoring ability, plenty of fwd and def depth at Hawks to free him up for rebounding. Houston has the potential to score same or outscore Sicily if he plays high mid TOG, so probably more upside to him. Comes down to team balance and personal risk threshold.
I would say Sicily. I feel he has a higher ceiling and could go on a run and become unattainable quite quickly. Whereas Houston, while he may hit that 90 - 95 avg, I don’t see him having that same potential to hurt us If we don’t start him.
Quote from: walloo44 on February 14, 2020, 12:03:07 PM
Houston or Sicily
Houston for me. Sicily can't be trusted...I like the ceiling there but I absolutely hate the floor. The second Hawthorns forward line looks dysfunctional guess who's getting swung forward?
Plus he's a certainty to do something dumb and miss a couple of weeks.
I feel like Sicily can be had at sub 450k just like last year...
A) Whitfield & Serong
B) Greenwood & D. Smith
Looking for a M6
Boak + $42k or Danger
Neale/Cripps/Titch/Bonts/Oliver as my other premiums
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 01, 2020, 09:45:06 PM
Looking for a M6
Boak + $42k or Danger
Neale/Cripps/Titch/Bonts/Oliver as my other premiums
Rowell
Surely your def or fwd is cooked if you go with 6 prem mids?
Otherwise, Danger > Boak
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 01, 2020, 09:47:51 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 01, 2020, 09:45:06 PM
Looking for a M6
Boak + $42k or Danger
Neale/Cripps/Titch/Bonts/Oliver as my other premiums
Rowell
Surely your def or fwd is cooked if you go with 6 prem mids?
Otherwise, Danger > Boak
Got Rowell.
DEF: Sicily/Houston/Doch/Robbo
RUC: Grundy/Marshall
FWD: Dusty/Greenwood or McPherson/Dev Smith
BJ vs Xerri vs Cameron
Quote from: wizlad on March 02, 2020, 12:55:04 AM
BJ vs Xerri vs Cameron
I'd pick all of them if they are all named Rd. 1.
Whitefield + Narkle vs. Danger + Dev Smith
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 02, 2020, 04:18:04 PM
Whitefield + Narkle vs. Danger + Dev Smith
Whitfield and Narkle for me. Hope for de ja vue for Dangerfield and get him at $471k just like last year.
Quote from: frenzy on March 02, 2020, 05:19:39 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 02, 2020, 04:18:04 PM
Whitefield + Narkle vs. Danger + Dev Smith
Whitfield and Narkle for me. Hope for de ja vue for Dangerfield and get him at $471k just like last year.
Agree with Frenzy
Greenwood + Houston vs. Whitfield + Dev
Quote from: SilverLion on March 03, 2020, 07:06:41 PM
Greenwood + Houston vs. Whitfield + Dev
Greenwood + Houston for me, just. Only for the fact Dev might not be a keeper...
Got a similar quandary including him though:
Dunkley + Dev
Vs
Walters + Narkle?
Quote from: js19 on March 03, 2020, 07:27:29 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on March 03, 2020, 07:06:41 PM
Greenwood + Houston vs. Whitfield + Dev
Greenwood + Houston for me, just. Only for the fact Dev might not be a keeper...
Got a similar quandary including him though:
Dunkley + Dev
Vs
Walters + Narkle?
Tough one this. Dunks and Devon could both have role issues and play fwd. and your paying full price for Walters, but I do like Narkle and am using him myself.
@ D2 Houston or Dawson?
Quote from: Woppa15 on March 04, 2020, 10:38:01 AM
@ D2 Houston or Dawson?
Has to be Dawson now with the news about Port/Saints having the standalone Round 11 bye.
Noble or Bonar? Looking at getting Dawson in but wondering which one of these expensive rooks is better.
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:
Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar
or
Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw
or
Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Quote from: Colley Dogs on March 05, 2020, 01:11:24 AM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:
Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar
or
Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw
or
Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Laird, Macrae, Smith
Quote from: Money Shot on March 05, 2020, 07:53:09 AM
Quote from: Colley Dogs on March 05, 2020, 01:11:24 AM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:
Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar
or
Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw
or
Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Laird, Macrae, Smith
+1
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 05, 2020, 09:42:43 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 05, 2020, 12:05:45 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on March 05, 2020, 07:53:09 AM
Quote from: Colley Dogs on March 05, 2020, 01:11:24 AM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:
Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar
or
Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw
or
Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Laird, Macrae, Smith
+1
Hearing you loud and clear. Thanks
Whitfield, Ceglar & Georgiadis
Or
Ceglar, Steven & D. Smith
Or
Whitfield, Steven/Smith & Bonar
Quote from: billnats on March 07, 2020, 01:14:06 AM
Whitfield & Georgiadis
Or
Steven & D. Smith
Whitfield & Georgiadis.Having both Dev and Steven is too risky imo, personally I'm running with Smith and waiting to see how he goes in Marsh 2.
M4 Bont vs Mitchell?I've had Bont pencilled in since the first version of my team, but he's probably the mid I like least out of Macrae, Neale, Cripps and Oliver due to his forward time, and Titch looked great tonight.
Quote from: jbjimmyjb on March 07, 2020, 01:16:26 AM
Quote from: billnats on March 07, 2020, 01:14:06 AM
Whitfield & Georgiadis
Or
Steven & D. Smith
Whitfield & Georgiadis.
Having both Dev and Steven is too risky imo, personally I'm running with Smith and waiting to see how he goes in Marsh 2.
M4 Bont vs Mitchell
I've had Bont pencilled in since the first version of my team, but I don't want any of my starting 5 mids having even a slight chance of being played forward, and Beveridge has a tendency to stick Bont forward when things aren't working.
My other mids are Macrae, Neale, Cripps and Oliver.
I’ve changed mine up a little bit so give me some feedback with new options.
As for yours, I’m currently running with both Bont & Mitchell at that price. Same midfield as yours but Macrae out to allow for the other two. If you definitely want Macrae than Mitchell allows you not to double up on the Bulldogs.
For M11:
Sharp v Budarick
Who scores better?
Who has better job security?
Quote from: Colley Dogs on March 07, 2020, 01:59:54 AM
For M11:
Sharp v Budarick
Who scores better?
Who has better job security?
If both are named round 1, pick both. If they're both named and you're forced to only pick one, I'd go Budarick.
JKelly/Danger/Bont/Titch + Dev
vs.
Coniglio + MacPherson
Quote from: SilverLion on March 07, 2020, 11:34:49 AM
Quote from: Colley Dogs on March 07, 2020, 01:59:54 AM
For M11:
Sharp v Budarick
Who scores better?
Who has better job security?
If both are named round 1, pick both. If they're both named and you're forced to only pick one, I'd go Budarick.
JKelly/Danger/Bont/Titch + Dev
vs.
Coniglio + MacPherson
Thanks for the input.
_______________
Regarding yours...
So difficult to call in isolation. I've been never been on the Dev Smith bandwagon, and have only had him in different versions of my team under duress! Instinctually I opt for Coniglio + MacPherson.
But I'm more interested in how this sits within the larger structure of your team. I've given my thoughts on your team page :)
Dawson v Petracca
I think Dawson is a safe bet for 90 or so but Petracca really has the capability to push 100. In saying that is also more likely to go 85 or less.
Quote from: Colley Dogs on March 07, 2020, 01:59:54 AM
For M11:
Sharp v Budarick
Who scores better?
Who has better job security?
At this stage I doubt you'll get the choice - take anyone we can get! Definitely starting both if they get named, and can't see a scenario where I would only pick one and not the other
Quote from: SilverLion on March 07, 2020, 11:34:49 AM
JKelly/Danger/Bont/Titch + Dev
vs.
Coniglio + MacPherson
Option 1, easily
Top 5 mid + Dev over a speculative mid and fwd
Quote from: Money Shot on March 08, 2020, 09:38:10 AM
Dawson v Petracca
I think Dawson is a safe bet for 90 or so but Petracca really has the capability to push 100. In saying that is also more likely to go 85 or less.
I'm just not convinced with Petracca, so I'd go with Dawson - DPP might be helpful too.
After the illuminating weekend "not really"
D.Smith v J.Steven v A.Brayshaw
I was pretty sold on what i have seen (and heard) on Brayshaw as a starting F3/F4. Lots of mid time with new coach Longmuir and set to be a possible breakout
Now Dev and Stephen have kicked my possible structure round with some pretty impressive SC scoring today
Whitfiled, Titch & Ash/Guthrie vs Ceglar, Conigs, Houston
Quote from: RoughRed on March 09, 2020, 08:32:30 PM
After the illuminating weekend "not really"
D.Smith v J.Steven v A.Brayshaw
I was pretty sold on what i have seen (and heard) on Brayshaw as a starting F3/F4. Lots of mid time with new coach Longmuir and set to be a possible breakout
Now Dev and Stephen have kicked my possible structure round with some pretty impressive SC scoring today
All of the above...
Quote from: tommy10 on March 10, 2020, 01:32:20 PM
Whitfiled, Titch & Ash/Guthrie vs Ceglar, Conigs, Houston
Option 1
Option 2 is just way too risky.
Grundy v Gawn? No cop out answers of “both†either please.
Quote from: IntegralX on March 10, 2020, 02:36:23 PM
Grundy v Gawn? No cop out answers of “both†either please.
Both ;)
But out of the two definitely Grundy.
Quote from: LordSneeze on March 10, 2020, 02:04:58 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 10, 2020, 01:32:20 PM
Whitfiled, Titch & Ash/Guthrie vs Ceglar, Conigs, Houston
Option 1
Option 2 is just way too risky.
Thanks LS, just thinking of having an extra premo in def, but agree with you and am sticking with option 1.
Houston v Dawson v Crisp
Quote from: dmac07 on March 10, 2020, 05:02:36 PM
Houston v Dawson v Crisp
Would say Houston out of the 3 purely because he's tipped to spend more time in the middle this year. In saying that, I haven't got any of them.
Roberton vs Cumming
Quote from: tommy10 on March 10, 2020, 05:08:11 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 10, 2020, 05:02:36 PM
Houston v Dawson v Crisp
Would say Houston out of the 3 purely because he's tipped to spend more time in the middle this year. In saying that, I haven't got any of them.
Roberton vs Cumming
Roberton 200%
F3/D4
Parish/Dawson & Noble
V
Steven & Roberton
@D4 Roberton vs Noble...?
Needing to “cut some fat†in order to fit everyone in and this is one of my options.
Quote from: Woppa15 on March 10, 2020, 11:48:56 PM
@D4 Roberton vs Noble...?
Needing to “cut some fat†in order to fit everyone in and this is one of my options.
Roberton's JS is much better than Nobles, but I think it depends on what that extra 45k unlocks for you.
Quote from: dmac07 on March 10, 2020, 06:22:39 PM
F3/D4
Parish/Dawson & Noble
V
Steven & Roberton
Toss a coin. Both have risks. If Steven and Roberton can reach their previous levels then they are the obvious choice as both will be keepers. So is that risk worth taking if not go first one.
Quote from: IntegralX on March 10, 2020, 11:55:49 PM
Quote from: Woppa15 on March 10, 2020, 11:48:56 PM
@D4 Roberton vs Noble...?
Needing to “cut some fat†in order to fit everyone in and this is one of my options.
Roberton's JS is much better than Nobles, but I think it depends on what that extra 45k unlocks for you.
Thanks Integral. I thought about this a bit overnight and I think I’ll stick with Roberton. He was my original pick so gotta to with the gut. Also, I think I’m more comfortable picking the bloke who is an established player and has the scoring history with injury/health interruption the reason for his low price, I feel it’s far less risky and speculative then trying to pick the breakout player who doesn’t have the scoring history.
Gawn+Greenwood+Roberton
Or
Jacobs+Walters+Hurn
Quote from: IntegralX on March 11, 2020, 11:44:35 AM
Gawn+Greenwood+Roberton
Or
Jacobs+Walters+Hurn
1st option for me. Walters and Hurn overpriced for me and you should get them cheaper. Robbo is cheap and hard to pass up.
Sicily v McCluggage?
Prices the same, who scores more until the byes. Ignore structure, Houston goes in the other position.
Quote from: Pokerface on March 11, 2020, 09:22:54 PM
Sicily v McCluggage?
Prices the same, who scores more until the byes. Ignore structure, Houston goes in the other position.
McClugage might our score him but Sicily much more likely to be top 10.
Quote from: Money Shot on March 11, 2020, 09:30:39 PM
Quote from: Pokerface on March 11, 2020, 09:22:54 PM
Sicily v McCluggage?
Prices the same, who scores more until the byes. Ignore structure, Houston goes in the other position.
McClugage might our score him but Sicily much more likely to be top 10.
+1, Sicily will more likely be a keeper in his position but McCluggage will score more you would think
Cheers Money, Wanderer. I tend to agree, though do I think McC is one of the sub 600s who could push for a top 10 this year. Hmm.
Quote from: Pokerface on March 11, 2020, 10:58:25 PM
Cheers Money, Wanderer. I tend to agree, though do I think McC is one of the sub 600s who could push for a top 10 this year. Hmm.
McC is more durable than some of the top 10 mids but the top 10 mids last year all averaged over 110. McC averaged 94 last year. The question is do you see him jumping 16 points in average this year? I'm guessing he could add another 10 points to his average which won't get him into top 10.
Howe v Parish v Andy Brayshaw for my last spot .(pending teams)
Quote from: frenzy on March 11, 2020, 11:31:59 PM
Howe v Parish v Andy Brayshaw for my last spot .(pending teams)
Parish for me
One I am considering
Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.
Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.
Quote from: Ringo on March 12, 2020, 10:34:44 AM
Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.
Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.
I'm in a similar situation, though looking at Naismith instead of Jacobs. Whitfield v Gawn is an interesting one and right now I have Whitfield.
Quote from: dylanclements on March 12, 2020, 10:56:45 AM
Quote from: Ringo on March 12, 2020, 10:34:44 AM
Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.
Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.
I'm in a similar situation, though looking at Naismith instead of Jacobs. Whitfield v Gawn is an interesting one and right now I have Whitfield.
if its just whitfield v gawn, gawn wins easily, depends where you spend the cash when you have gawn. Gawn is a better sc captain and scored 917 more sc points than whitfield last year.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 12, 2020, 05:08:12 PM
Quote from: dylanclements on March 12, 2020, 10:56:45 AM
Quote from: Ringo on March 12, 2020, 10:34:44 AM
Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.
Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.
I'm in a similar situation, though looking at Naismith instead of Jacobs. Whitfield v Gawn is an interesting one and right now I have Whitfield.
if its just whitfield v gawn, gawn wins easily, depends where you spend the cash when you have gawn. Gawn is a better sc captain and scored 917 more sc points than whitfield last year.
That's right, I should have developed that a bit more. The money is used for better back and forward rookies. More importantly for me, there is a significant opportunity cost involved in fielding the third and fourth best forward rookies this year, rather than Whitfield and the third best rookie - in other words, Naismith on field looks a lot better than e.g. King or Georgiades, who I would have to play if I had Gawn in
G'day Lads. Quick one:
DMac & Zerk-Thatcher vs Ceglar & Noble
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 12, 2020, 07:04:30 PM
G'day Lads. Quick one:
DMac & Zerk-Thatcher vs Ceglar & Noble
ceglar & noble if you need ruck cover
Neale & Oliver or Bonts & Titchell
Quote from: billnats on March 12, 2020, 09:15:42 PM
Neale & Oliver or Bonts & Titchell
Bont & Tich had Oliver all last year never again . Although never say never in supercoach
Gawn vs Macrae?
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
Dev Smith for me most upside if he stays healthy.
Quote from: Rodi on March 15, 2020, 11:51:37 AM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
ABrayshaw
Quote from: RoughRed on March 15, 2020, 03:25:23 PM
Quote from: Rodi on March 15, 2020, 11:51:37 AM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
ABrayshaw
Fitter, a few kgs of muscle on the frame, midtime minutes under a new coach
Quote from: Rodi on March 15, 2020, 11:51:37 AM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
Jack Steven
Lower starting price and higher scoring potential
Quote from: sidvicious on March 15, 2020, 06:00:17 PM
Quote from: Rodi on March 15, 2020, 11:51:37 AM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
Jack Steven
Lower starting price and higher scoring potential
Of the 3 I think Steven, followed closely by Smith. Brayshaw a long was behind both of them.
Steven 7 of last 8 years over 80 average. including 3 over 100 and 5 over 90. Last year only played 7 games, but still hit 90+ in 3 of them. Risk for me onhim wasn't scoring, it was the job security and rest factor.
Brayshaw doesn't have the runs on the board, only gone over 80 in 7 of 39 games.
Smith I can make a case for, but its been done to death on here, so I wont repeat it all.
I’d go with brayshaw and dev
Steven or Ceglar?
I have Naismith at R2
Gawn & Mid Bench Rookie (Mahoney/Robertson) vs Naismith & Titch
Quote from: timtim on March 15, 2020, 10:44:50 PM
Steven or Ceglar?
I have Naismith at R2
With Naismith at 2 I would go the added protection of Ceglar ensuring you have a R/f at R3
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 15, 2020, 11:33:35 PM
Gawn & Mid Bench Rookie (Mahoney/Robertson) vs Naismith & Titch
Hard one here Nismith say 75 average and Titch say 120 total 195 v Gawn say 130 so in front there but will be soundly dependent on how quick you can upgrade as both options have only one keeper.
Roberton (D3)+ Noble (D4) + 133k (to be used elsewhere) v Houston (D3) + Greaves + $300. Have Zerk-Thatcher and Starcevich currently on the field aswell.
Player Club Pos Price Games Mins TOG% Pts PPM 100 Ave 1 2
Darcy MacPherson GCS Fwd/Mid $443,800 2 213 86.2% 259 121.6 129.5 132 127
or
Andrew Brayshaw FRE Fwd/Mid $382,800 2 164 70.5% 196 119.5 98 94 102
or
Tom J. Lynch RIC Fwd $388,800 1 110 90.5% 111 100.9 111 111
i like lynch given all the G games at home, but we all know about key fwds.
GCS as per another thread here, ??
so leaves me with brayshaw
Cogs or Yeo
Quote from: TurtlesTerriers on March 17, 2020, 06:23:15 PM
Player Club Pos Price Games Mins TOG% Pts PPM 100 Ave 1 2
Darcy MacPherson GCS Fwd/Mid $443,800 2 213 86.2% 259 121.6 129.5 132 127
or
Andrew Brayshaw FRE Fwd/Mid $382,800 2 164 70.5% 196 119.5 98 94 102
or
Tom J. Lynch RIC Fwd $388,800 1 110 90.5% 111 100.9 111 111
i like lynch given all the G games at home, but we all know about key fwds.
GCS as per another thread here, ??
so leaves me with brayshaw
We don't know how many G games he has now.
Quote from: whynot102 on March 17, 2020, 08:13:56 PM
Cogs or Yeo
Good question... my M5 swings between these two. ..
I am going to review the proposed game schedule and who each plays and where. I have Cogs mainly because he has the captaincy now ... No other reason except that I expect him to respond positively to that
A: McPherson & Houston
Or
B: Laird & Ceglar
Quote from: Carn on March 18, 2020, 10:45:20 PM
A: McPherson & Houston
Or
B: Laird & Ceglar
Option B, plus let’s u have ruck cover
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 17, 2020, 02:03:14 PM
Roberton (D3)+ Noble (D4) + 133k (to be used elsewhere) v Houston (D3) + Greaves + $300. Have Zerk-Thatcher and Starcevich currently on the field aswell.
First option
Quote from: TurtlesTerriers on March 17, 2020, 06:23:15 PM
Player Club Pos Price Games Mins TOG% Pts PPM 100 Ave 1 2
Darcy MacPherson GCS Fwd/Mid $443,800 2 213 86.2% 259 121.6 129.5 132 127
or
Andrew Brayshaw FRE Fwd/Mid $382,800 2 164 70.5% 196 119.5 98 94 102
or
Tom J. Lynch RIC Fwd $388,800 1 110 90.5% 111 100.9 111 111
i like lynch given all the G games at home, but we all know about key fwds.
GCS as per another thread here, ??
so leaves me with brayshaw
DMac :-*
Quote from: whynot102 on March 17, 2020, 08:13:56 PM
Cogs or Yeo
Cogs
Quote from: Carn on March 18, 2020, 10:45:20 PM
A: McPherson & Houston
Or
B: Laird & Ceglar
A because DMac :-*
Cogs + Greenwood + And. Brayshaw vs. Titch + Whitfield + Rookie
Quote from: SilverLion on March 19, 2020, 10:57:38 AM
Cogs + Greenwood + And. Brayshaw vs. Titch + Whitfield + Rookie
Prob option b for me. Get 2 essentially guaranteed keepers vs 1 keeper and 2 maybes.
1. Laird, Cogs, Naismith, Petracca
Vs
2. Sicily, Viney, Gawn, Cavarra
Another 2:
Laird and Josh Kelly
Vs
Sicily and Neale
Neale v Fyfe
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 19, 2020, 05:47:33 PM
Another 2:
Laird and Josh Kelly
Vs
Sicily and Neale
Neale v Fyfe
I have gone with Laird and Fyfe.
Walters + defensive rookie (D5) + 39k v Andrew Brayshaw, Noble + 112k left in bank.
I've been wrestling with whether to get SPS in all pre-season. I wish he played one Marsh game so I could at least get one glimpse of his role this year.
Gawn + Roberton + Andrew Brayshaw v Nic Nat + Houston + Parish + 37.8k
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 19, 2020, 11:53:05 PM
Gawn + Roberton + Andrew Brayshaw v Nic Nat + Houston + Parish + 37.8k
Option 2 ... no ... Option 1
Can I have NN + Houston + Brayshaw ???
Stevens out so have taken a playing rook which now leaves me with $240K in the kitty
Question Do I "upgrade" Cogs?
Who from Macrae/JKelly/Bont/Danger or keep the money?
Really struggling to pick two out of Bont, Macrae and Dunkley. help!
Quote from: tkringle on March 20, 2020, 02:06:12 PM
Really struggling to pick two out of Bont, Macrae and Dunkley. help!
Bont and Macrae
Gawn (R2) + Rookie (M11) + $4k
or
Jacobs (R2) + Narkle (M6) + $73K
Quote from: RoughRed on March 20, 2020, 01:46:25 PM
Stevens out so have taken a playing rook which now leaves me with $240K in the kitty
Question Do I "upgrade" Cogs?
Who from Macrae/JKelly/Bont/Danger or keep the money?
Macrae
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 20, 2020, 03:05:18 PM
Gawn (R2) + Rookie (M11) + $4k
or
Jacobs (R2) + Narkle (M6) + $73K
Option 1
Tyler Brown v Justin McInerny
Quote from: SilverLion on March 20, 2020, 02:14:25 PM
Quote from: tkringle on March 20, 2020, 02:06:12 PM
Really struggling to pick two out of Bont, Macrae and Dunkley. help!
Bont and Macrae
Bont and Kelly (Macrae if you want to though...)
Last mid:
McInerney v Noah Anderson v Ash?
Assuming we don't get both Robertson and Starcevich today...
B. Smith + Cogs vs Howe + Mitchell?
Quote from: IntegralX on March 20, 2020, 05:08:03 PM
B. Smith + Cogs vs Howe + Mitchell?
I'm saying Smith + Cogs. It's slightly speculative, but Smith is set for good mid time and Cogs looks set to take another step this year. Mitchell a great pick imo but I have doubts on Howe
Please pick 3 lads
Georgiadis
King
Curtis Taylor
Ben Davis
Sturt
Bedford
Ballenden
Bont vs Dunkley vs Danger?
Pls pick one
Quote from: AN1611 on March 20, 2020, 06:59:40 PM
Bont vs Dunkley vs Danger?
Pls pick one
all solid picks.
Gawn and Schultz (F5)
Vs
English and Petracca/McPherson (F4)
Davis vs Cavarra for F7?
McInerney vs T Brown (Bench)
J Dawson vs Petracca (F4)
Quote from: tkringle on March 20, 2020, 07:17:10 PM
Davis vs Cavarra for F7?
Cavarra
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 20, 2020, 07:30:43 PM
McInerney vs T Brown (Bench)
J Dawson vs Petracca (F4)
Brown and Petracca
How about Xerri, Comben or Conroy for R3??
gawn+rookie vs ceglar+nic nat?
Mcasey v Zac Gutherie
Quote from: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 08:08:00 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2020, 08:02:08 PM
Mcasey v Zac Gutherie
Guthrie
do you have a particular reason why you'd pick him? cause in the past when i have seen him he has been shower.
Green and K Pickett
v.
Robertson and Schultz
First option better in some ways, but Green would be on the bench. Option two with Schultz on field seems more comfortable than K Pickett, and Robertson on field gives me M Pickett's score.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2020, 08:15:26 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 08:08:00 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2020, 08:02:08 PM
Mcasey v Zac Gutherie
Guthrie
do you have a particular reason why you'd pick him? cause in the past when i have seen him he has been shower.
Has a couple of years under his belt so should improve.
Thatcher or Brander.
Titch vs Bont v Kelly
Bont vs Cogs & extra $80k for future trades
Had a play around and tried to get more depth in my side and wanted to see what everyone thinks.
1. Gawn- T. Green (mid) - McAsey (def)
v
2. Naismith- Coniglio- Houston
Quote from: B. on March 21, 2020, 09:39:37 AM
Had a play around and tried to get more depth in my side and wanted to see what everyone thinks.
1. Gawn- T. Green (mid) - McAsey (def)
v
2. Naismith- Coniglio- Houston
Option 2 is around $250k more, so depends where that money is taken from...
Sicily or Houston? ???
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Quote from: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 10:30:30 AM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Quote from: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 10:54:59 AM
Quote from: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 10:30:30 AM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?
Quote from: js19 on March 21, 2020, 10:11:07 AM
Quote from: B. on March 21, 2020, 09:39:37 AM
Had a play around and tried to get more depth in my side and wanted to see what everyone thinks.
1. Gawn- T. Green (mid) - McAsey (def)
v
2. Naismith- Coniglio- Houston
Option 2 is around $250k more, so depends where that money is taken from...
Sorry was short on Cogs/Houston but flicking Gawn gave me both!
Quote from: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 10:59:18 AM
Quote from: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 10:54:59 AM
Quote from: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 10:30:30 AM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?
It all depends on Hurleys ability to score in a key position back role and he seems more susceptible to low scoring games than Houston who is playing more on the ball. Titch is better than Oliver and Danger IMO.
Quote from: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 01:17:35 PM
Quote from: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 10:59:18 AM
Quote from: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 10:54:59 AM
Quote from: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 10:30:30 AM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?
It all depends on Hurleys ability to score in a key position back role and he seems more susceptible to low scoring games than Houston who is playing more on the ball. Titch is better than Oliver and Danger IMO.
Hurley is tempting though. Similar position to Howe - underpriced after a down year
Quote from: js19 on March 21, 2020, 01:36:15 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 01:17:35 PM
Quote from: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 10:59:18 AM
Quote from: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 10:54:59 AM
Quote from: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 10:30:30 AM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?
It all depends on Hurleys ability to score in a key position back role and he seems more susceptible to low scoring games than Houston who is playing more on the ball. Titch is better than Oliver and Danger IMO.
Hurley is tempting though. Similar position to Howe - underpriced after a down year
Hurley scored 43 and 116 in his two Marsh series. He can go big, but he can pull out the low scores. I haven't been watching the Bombers so I'm no expert, but isn't he the full back? I don't think Howe is locking down the key forwards. That would be Moore and Roughead, which leaves Howe more open to intercept, link up and drive the ball outside the back 50.
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Quote from: tkringle on March 21, 2020, 02:10:59 PM
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Davis
Z.Guthrie vs Roberton?
Guthrie gives me the cash to get a higher priced rookie that is playing vs having a non-playing rookie like Williams.
I don't know anything about Guthrie JS but his Marsh scores weren't bad.
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2020, 02:14:12 PM
Quote from: tkringle on March 21, 2020, 02:10:59 PM
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Davis
It's a toss up between Davis and Georgiadis. Davis slightly cheaper but I went with Georgiadis because they are playing GC.
Sicily or Houston?
Quote from: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 02:18:35 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2020, 02:14:12 PM
Quote from: tkringle on March 21, 2020, 02:10:59 PM
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Davis
It's a toss up between Davis and Georgiadis. Davis slightly cheaper but I went with Georgiadis because they are playing GC.
Yeah i've decided to go with Georgiades as well..
Quote from: Slick5 on March 21, 2020, 02:19:48 PM
Sicily or Houston?
I went with Sicily because Hawks have more key position defenders this year, so you would think Sicily plays that sweeper role, the way Howe did last night, and it looks like a higher scoring role under the new format. If Houston didn't have a good finish last year I wouldn't even be considering him.
FWIW, Sicily first three games vs GCS/ADEL/NTH, Houston BRIS/FREO/COLL. I can see lots of intercept marks and link up plays out of the backline for Sicily to start the year.
Quote from: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 02:16:53 PM
Z.Guthrie vs Roberton?
Guthrie gives me the cash to get a higher priced rookie that is playing vs having a non-playing rookie like Williams.
I don't know anything about Guthrie JS but his Marsh scores weren't bad.
I have both and very unconvinced that either be worth it in the long-term. I'd probably get roberton as is way more likely to be a more reliable sc player. If possible i'd try and get cash from somewhere else.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 21, 2020, 02:37:29 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 02:16:53 PM
Z.Guthrie vs Roberton?
Guthrie gives me the cash to get a higher priced rookie that is playing vs having a non-playing rookie like Williams.
I don't know anything about Guthrie JS but his Marsh scores weren't bad.
I have both and very unconvinced that either be worth it in the long-term. I'd probably get roberton as is way more likely to be a more reliable sc player. If possible i'd try and get cash from somewhere else.
The way I see it is Guthrie saves me 75K. If Guthrie can stay within 15 points average of Roberton, then it would be worth it. Lets say Roberton scores 80 average, you would think Guthrie could manage a 65. The only problem is I have no idea what Guthrie's JS is like.
Sicily v Laird
Houston v Brodie Smith
Got a sneaky feeling Smith is going close to 100 this year.
Quote from: backpocket on March 21, 2020, 02:53:44 PM
Sicily v Laird
Houston v Brodie Smith
Got a sneaky feeling Smith is going close to 100 this year.
I would love Laird over Sicily, but I'm about $400 short and can't work out how to manage that. Laird and Houston.
Sicily or Houston?
Doedee + Roberton (1 trade needed) vs Rivers + Howe (2 trades needed)
Option 2 I traded out Roberton for Howe this week
Quote from: SilverLion on June 10, 2020, 10:34:32 PM
Doedee + Roberton (1 trade needed) vs Rivers + Howe (2 trades needed)
Townsend + Rivers (can loop with Starcevich) vs. Doedee + Cameron (can loop with Brander)
Quote from: SilverLion on June 11, 2020, 08:05:37 PM
Townsend + Rivers (can loop with Starcevich) vs. Doedee + Cameron (can loop with Brander)
Option 2 for me
A) Bewley & Ridley
B) Heeney & Rivers
C) Shiel v Rivers
Worried about Rivers being dropped after just the one game
Quote from: billnats on June 11, 2020, 11:10:44 PM
A) Bewley & Ridley
B) Heeney & Rivers
C) Shiel v Rivers
Worried about Rivers being dropped after just the one game
from this list i'd go B. Although rivers is a pretty risky pick.
DBJ + King on field v Doedee (D4) + long/townsend
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 11, 2020, 11:37:23 PM
DBJ + King on field v Doedee (D4) + long/townsend
Doedee and Long just for me
Bont (keeping), Bewley and Townsend
Vs
Greenwood, Jacobs and Long
Quote from: js19 on June 12, 2020, 09:53:13 AM
Bont (keeping), Bewley and Townsend
Vs
Greenwood, Jacobs and Long
The 2nd one.
Quote from: js19 on June 12, 2020, 09:53:13 AM
Bont (keeping), Bewley and Townsend
Vs
Greenwood, Jacobs and Long
I don't like either of those options but if forced to pick one it would be option 2
Quote from: js19 on June 12, 2020, 09:52:14 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 11, 2020, 11:37:23 PM
DBJ + King on field v Doedee (D4) + long/townsend
Doedee and Long just for me
thanks m8. i am very indecisive with this decision. The rookie would probably end up being budarick instead of king. i feel doedee and long has the potential to make more money although option one is likely to be more safer.
Bewley or Long?
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 12, 2020, 01:13:12 PM
Quote from: js19 on June 12, 2020, 09:52:14 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 11, 2020, 11:37:23 PM
DBJ + King on field v Doedee (D4) + long/townsend
Doedee and Long just for me
thanks m8. i am very indecisive with this decision. The rookie would probably end up being budarick instead of king. i feel doedee and long has the potential to make more money although option one is likely to be more safer.
i could also do Rivers (emergency loophole with starcevich) + Simpkin and 117k left over. Which i can then do BZT to Doedee next week if doedee does well this week.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 12, 2020, 03:19:45 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 12, 2020, 01:13:12 PM
Quote from: js19 on June 12, 2020, 09:52:14 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 11, 2020, 11:37:23 PM
DBJ + King on field v Doedee (D4) + long/townsend
Doedee and Long just for me
thanks m8. i am very indecisive with this decision. The rookie would probably end up being budarick instead of king. i feel doedee and long has the potential to make more money although option one is likely to be more safer.
i could also do Rivers (emergency loophole with starcevich) + Simpkin and 117k left over. Which i can then do BZT to Doedee next week if doedee does well this week.
That sounds like a good move, but keep in mind there are only two trades next week. Think about who you might want to get next week and if you already have two in mind, then better to get Doedee this week. If you don't have two in mind to get next week, then better to wait a week for Doedee.
Brayshaw to Wingard or Greenwood?
Gone to Wingard - big numbers last half dozen games and certainly starting in the guts
Tom Stewart v nick Haynes
Tom Mitchell v coniglio
Reason?
For my last trade:
Rivers vs McHenry
I'll grab the other one next week.
If I get Rivers I'll play him (over Starcevich), but if I grab McHenry I'll need to play Starcevich..
Quote from: jfitty on June 12, 2020, 07:38:14 PM
For my last trade:
Rivers vs McHenry
I'll grab the other one next week.
If I get Rivers I'll play him (over Starcevich), but if I grab McHenry I'll need to play Starcevich..
Have you got Bennell or taking a pass on him?
Quote from: backpocket on June 12, 2020, 07:59:00 PM
Quote from: jfitty on June 12, 2020, 07:38:14 PM
For my last trade:
Rivers vs McHenry
I'll grab the other one next week.
If I get Rivers I'll play him (over Starcevich), but if I grab McHenry I'll need to play Starcevich..
Have you got Bennell or taking a pass on him?
Already brought him in for Green :)
Would you bring in Bennel or Rivers early> need to go early on one to leave room next week for the best of the alternative, McHenry and Sturt (if he is back)
Quote from: tkringle on June 13, 2020, 11:46:47 AM
Would you bring in Bennel or Rivers early> need to go early on one to leave room next week for the best of the alternative, McHenry and Sturt (if he is back)
Rivers because he is DPP and gives you more flexibility
Quote from: Wanderer on June 13, 2020, 11:48:49 AM
Quote from: tkringle on June 13, 2020, 11:46:47 AM
Would you bring in Bennel or Rivers early> need to go early on one to leave room next week for the best of the alternative, McHenry and Sturt (if he is back)
Rivers because he is DPP and gives you more flexibility
This, plus surely you'd wanna see Bennell get through a game before bringing him in.
Hello everyone. Nice to be back :)
Trading out Houston:
DBJ v Howe v Haynes
Quote from: Colley Dogs on June 15, 2020, 12:01:28 PM
Hello everyone. Nice to be back :)
Trading out Houston:
DBJ v Howe v Haynes
Howe > Haynes > DBJ
Gawn v Goldy?
Quote from: oh_lol on June 15, 2020, 06:15:21 PM
Gawn v Goldy?
If Goldy can keep it up, a huge POD.
Quote from: Thewizz71 on June 15, 2020, 07:35:26 PM
Quote from: oh_lol on June 15, 2020, 06:15:21 PM
Gawn v Goldy?
If Goldy can keep it up, a huge POD.
A POD just for the sake of being one. Not sure it's actually a good POD when Grundy Gawn is the opposition/alternative
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on June 15, 2020, 08:16:34 PM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on June 15, 2020, 07:35:26 PM
Quote from: oh_lol on June 15, 2020, 06:15:21 PM
Gawn v Goldy?
If Goldy can keep it up, a huge POD.
A POD just for the sake of being one. Not sure it's actually a good POD when Grundy Gawn is the opposition/alternative
Not sure he can keep it up, but after 2/17 rounds, second top scorer, ahead of the other two, proven scorer.... could be the difference.
Not sure I want to risk it, but, just saying.
Starcevich V Rivers
Quote from: Fid on June 16, 2020, 06:17:25 PM
Starcevich V Rivers
Rivers is much cheaper so him but Starcevich might have better JS listening to the coach talk about him , that probably hasn't helped you at all :D
Quote from: shaker on June 16, 2020, 06:25:48 PM
Quote from: Fid on June 16, 2020, 06:17:25 PM
Starcevich V Rivers
Rivers is much cheaper so him but Starcevich might have better JS listening to the coach talk about him , that probably hasn't helped you at all :D
lol, thanks ???
Rank the following: Stewart, Rampe, DBJ, Haynes. Take price into consideration.
Quote from: IntegralX on June 16, 2020, 09:16:17 PM
Rank the following: Stewart, Rampe, DBJ, Haynes. Take price into consideration.
I really like DBJ for some reason.
Reckon this is his breakout season.
Quote from: IntegralX on June 16, 2020, 09:16:17 PM
Rank the following: Stewart, Rampe, DBJ, Haynes. Take price into consideration.
Stewart and wouldn't bother with the rest.
Rivers vs Bennell
Bennell based on last weeks game but need to be prepared for a possible injury based on history. Hopefully he makes cash quickly to counter, For what it is worth I have both.
I’d love to have both, but think I’ll grab Sturt this week (providing he’s playing) and one of them
Goldy + Sturt + 20k
V
Pittonet + Baz Smith + 90k
Quote from: IntegralX on June 16, 2020, 09:16:17 PM
Rank the following: Stewart, Rampe, DBJ, Haynes. Take price into consideration.
Stewart, Haynes, DBJ, Rampe
Quote from: bkimm32 on June 17, 2020, 09:12:43 AM
Rivers vs Bennell
Both but if you had to choose one Rivers - DPP and plus Bennell more injury prone.
Bennell spent so much of the game running the boundary. His TOG was super low but when he was on the field he looked legit. Rivers was also excellent. I'd honestly try to grab both but I don't know if you can trust Bennell on field with such low TOG %
Who to punt?
Bont v NicNat?
Bont -> anyone (probably Fyfe or Zerrett)
NicNat -> Goldy or Gawn (actually leaning towards Goldy :o)
Rivers v Bennell v Sturt v Georgiades
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 18, 2020, 07:40:13 PM
Rivers v Bennell v Sturt v Georgiades
Leaning towards Bennell. Think sturt and Georgia's will rely on goals too much.
Like Rivers as well.
Got bennell last week. Rivers this week.
Quote from: Thewizz71 on June 18, 2020, 07:43:16 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 18, 2020, 07:40:13 PM
Rivers v Bennell v Sturt v Georgiades
Leaning towards Bennell. Think sturt and Georgia's will rely on goals too much.
Like Rivers as well.
Got bennell last week. Rivers this week.
Thanks m8. I almost have rivers locked in although if I go with a second rookie its now bennell v Sturt.
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
Sturt v Georgiades.
Missed out on both their games round one
Quote from: benharris222 on June 18, 2020, 08:02:33 PM
Sturt v Georgiades.
Missed out on both their games round one
Sturt considering he’s named on field and georg in extended
Quote from: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 07:59:26 PM
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
If price isn't an issue id easily go walters
Quote from: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 08:05:22 PM
Quote from: benharris222 on June 18, 2020, 08:02:33 PM
Sturt v Georgiades.
Missed out on both their games round one
Sturt considering he’s named on field and georg in extended
Thank you! What about scoring potential? Both need to rely on goals...?
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 18, 2020, 08:17:58 PM
Quote from: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 07:59:26 PM
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
If price isn't an issue id easily go walters
What if we take Walters out of the equation ?
Thinking of trading Dusty, here are the options
Selwood, Rozee, Bailey Smith, Tom Stewart or Ablett
Other option is hold
I'm leaning towards Selwood.....
Quote from: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 08:25:40 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 18, 2020, 08:17:58 PM
Quote from: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 07:59:26 PM
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
If price isn't an issue id easily go walters
What if we take Walters out of the equation ?
I have the same dilemma.
I'm leaning towards Petracca. Heeney will certainly come down in price after last week and is quite inconsistent; Rozee has posted 2 great scores against 2 awful teams; Smith is great but those ins put a question mark over his role.
I'm leaning towards getting CP.
Quote from: IntegralX on June 18, 2020, 08:32:51 PM
Quote from: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 08:25:40 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 18, 2020, 08:17:58 PM
Quote from: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 07:59:26 PM
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
If price isn't an issue id easily go walters
What if we take Walters out of the equation ?
I have the same dilemma.
I'm leaning towards Petracca. Heeney will certainly come down in price after last week and is quite inconsistent; Rozee has posted 2 great scores against 2 awful teams; Smith is great but those ins put a question mark over his role.
I'm leaning towards getting CP.
He burnt me badly a few years which 3rd degree burns, still hurts
Quote from: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 08:34:45 PM
Quote from: IntegralX on June 18, 2020, 08:32:51 PM
Quote from: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 08:25:40 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 18, 2020, 08:17:58 PM
Quote from: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 07:59:26 PM
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
If price isn't an issue id easily go walters
What if we take Walters out of the equation ?
I have the same dilemma.
I'm leaning towards Petracca. Heeney will certainly come down in price after last week and is quite inconsistent; Rozee has posted 2 great scores against 2 awful teams; Smith is great but those ins put a question mark over his role.
I'm leaning towards getting CP.
He burnt me badly a few years which 3rd degree burns, still hurts
I know. He was on my never again list but he finally looks primed for that breakout season, especially paired with what looks like a very sharp decline from Nate Jones.
Probably been done, but Sturt vs Bennell
Robertson (Brisbane) v Bedford (Melbourne).
Which of these rookies is most likely going to get a game again? Want to trade one of them for Sturt.
Quote from: oh_lol on June 19, 2020, 07:49:41 PM
Robertson (Brisbane) v Bedford (Melbourne).
Which of these rookies is most likely going to get a game again? Want to trade one of them for Sturt.
dont know enough about either but id trade bedford
Bye bye Bedford
sturt vs cameron
Simpkin v Petracca?
Can Simpkin keep it up? Wha't his role been this year?
Trac? Will he burn us again? "It's a trap!?"
Leaning towards Simpkin, hopefully he can continue to break out this year.
Quote from: Thewizz71 on June 23, 2020, 11:10:50 AM
Simpkin v Petracca?
Can Simpkin keep it up? Wha't his role been this year?
Trac? Will he burn us again? "It's a trap!?"
Leaning towards Simpkin, hopefully he can continue to break out this year.
another to consider is Bailey Smith
Quote from: frenzy on June 23, 2020, 05:52:42 PM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on June 23, 2020, 11:10:50 AM
Simpkin v Petracca?
Can Simpkin keep it up? Wha't his role been this year?
Trac? Will he burn us again? "It's a trap!?"
Leaning towards Simpkin, hopefully he can continue to break out this year.
another to consider is Bailey Smith
Also Hugh Greenwood. Struggling to split these guys
Quote from: Rusty00 on June 24, 2020, 03:02:31 PM
Quote from: frenzy on June 23, 2020, 05:52:42 PM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on June 23, 2020, 11:10:50 AM
Simpkin v Petracca?
Can Simpkin keep it up? Wha't his role been this year?
Trac? Will he burn us again? "It's a trap!?"
Leaning towards Simpkin, hopefully he can continue to break out this year.
another to consider is Bailey Smith
Also Hugh Greenwood. Struggling to split these guys
And Brad Ebert. Might add a poll.
Louis Butler or Will Hamil?
Power move
Jelly to Neale Pickett to Bennell
or Strategic move
T. Green to Bennell Sturt to Hamill via Brander
Would go first option as Neale will probably rise another 30k this week.
Long to Ridley (already own doedee) + Whitfield to Simpkin or Walters (have to play both taylor/king)
vs
Long to Simpkin + BZT to S.Philp (or another rookie) (allows me to do emergency loophole with taylor and King)
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 26, 2020, 06:14:13 PM
Long to Ridley (already own doedee) + Whitfield to Simpkin or Walters (have to play both taylor/king)
vs
Long to Simpkin + BZT to S.Philp (or another rookie) (allows me to do emergency loophole with taylor and King)
I prefer option 2. But if you do you lock in that your keeping Whitfield.
Quote from: LordSneeze on June 26, 2020, 07:12:27 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 26, 2020, 06:14:13 PM
Long to Ridley (already own doedee) + Whitfield to Simpkin or Walters (have to play both taylor/king)
vs
Long to Simpkin + BZT to S.Philp (or another rookie) (allows me to do emergency loophole with taylor and King)
I prefer option 2. But if you do you lock in that your keeping Whitfield.
Thanks m8. Do you know much about Sam Philp or Jack Mahony? I want to take a punt on one of them to give me the best team setup for this week.
Simpkin v Bailey Smith?
Simpkin, more mature - Smith may drop off a bit later. Gee the dogs have a good midfield with Bont, Dunks, Macrae, Smith
Williamson or Hill?
Quote from: tkringle on July 02, 2020, 07:08:43 PM
Williamson or Hill?
I brought in Williamson last week and he looked really nice. You'd have to think that Hill has the higher scoring potential, but also the potential to miss more games. If you think he'll get injured again I'd say go Williamson. Also the def/fwd flexibility of Hill is nice.
Lloyd v Daniel v Haynes v Ridley ?
Quote from: B. on July 03, 2020, 01:57:42 PM
Lloyd v Daniel v Haynes v Ridley ?
Trying to split these and Maynard myself.
I'd have them in the order you do there
Lloyd is expensive, but we know his role and how he can score. Daniel very similar. Haynes will be a really consistent pick without the ceiling, and I'm not as big a fan of Ridley as others.
Keen to think where everyone sees Maynard fitting in with those 4.
Quote from: jfitty on July 03, 2020, 02:06:59 PM
Quote from: B. on July 03, 2020, 01:57:42 PM
Lloyd v Daniel v Haynes v Ridley ?
Trying to split these and Maynard myself.
I'd have them in the order you do there
Lloyd is expensive, but we know his role and how he can score. Daniel very similar. Haynes will be a really consistent pick without the ceiling, and I'm not as big a fan of Ridley as others.
Keen to think where everyone sees Maynard fitting in with those 4.
Lloyd has a BE of 137 this week, so if you can hold off you MAY get him cheaper in a week or two. Well, that's my plan anyhow.
Quote from: jfitty on July 03, 2020, 02:06:59 PM
Quote from: B. on July 03, 2020, 01:57:42 PM
Lloyd v Daniel v Haynes v Ridley ?
Trying to split these and Maynard myself.
I'd have them in the order you do there
Lloyd is expensive, but we know his role and how he can score. Daniel very similar. Haynes will be a really consistent pick without the ceiling, and I'm not as big a fan of Ridley as others.
Keen to think where everyone sees Maynard fitting in with those 4.
What about Saad? Any better than those options & Maynard?
The thing that worries me about Maynard is Jack Crisp is still in that team...
Probably leaning towards Haynes then Lloyd in a couple
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
Quote from: billnats on July 03, 2020, 08:48:50 PM
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
I'd go with B or C
Green v Serong v Hill
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 04, 2020, 01:01:17 PM
Quote from: billnats on July 03, 2020, 08:48:50 PM
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
I'd go with B or C
Green v Serong v Hill
Green- no injury risk and looked solid.
Quote from: HoleMeal on July 04, 2020, 01:25:08 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 04, 2020, 01:01:17 PM
Quote from: billnats on July 03, 2020, 08:48:50 PM
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
I'd go with B or C
Green v Serong v Hill
Green- no injury risk and looked solid.
I was going to get rid of Pickett but as someone pointed out not all players will go into hub so he stays for now still think he can make some $$ so out of them D for me but still need to make a decision myself between Green and Serong today and are leaning green's way.
Quote from: shaker on July 04, 2020, 01:49:19 PM
Quote from: HoleMeal on July 04, 2020, 01:25:08 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 04, 2020, 01:01:17 PM
Quote from: billnats on July 03, 2020, 08:48:50 PM
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
I'd go with B or C
Green v Serong v Hill
Green- no injury risk and looked solid.
I was going to get rid of Pickett but as someone pointed out not all players will go into hub so he stays for now still think he can make some $$ so out of them D for me but still need to make a decision myself between Green and Serong today and are leaning green's way.
agree like the look of green, how is job security for him though?
Quote from: crowls on July 04, 2020, 01:56:47 PM
Quote from: shaker on July 04, 2020, 01:49:19 PM
Quote from: HoleMeal on July 04, 2020, 01:25:08 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 04, 2020, 01:01:17 PM
Quote from: billnats on July 03, 2020, 08:48:50 PM
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
I'd go with B or C
Green v Serong v Hill
Green- no injury risk and looked solid.
I was going to get rid of Pickett but as someone pointed out not all players will go into hub so he stays for now still think he can make some $$ so out of them D for me but still need to make a decision myself between Green and Serong today and are leaning green's way.
agree like the look of green, how is job security for him though?
Yeah bit of a worry with GWS but Taranto is still a bit off and Serong looks good very solid body as well and Fyfe out for a couple now I'm confused again ;D and just seen Ward is out with soreness so has to be Green.
yeh, i am going to sleep on it, will trade viney to one of green/serong tomorrow. Gives me a chance to see what richmond does with pickett and the hub.
Quote from: crowls on July 04, 2020, 02:16:23 PM
yeh, i am going to sleep on it, will trade viney to one of green/serong tomorrow. Gives me a chance to see what richmond does with pickett and the hub.
Got to get rid of Brander to avoid a donut so 30 minutes to make decision.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 04, 2020, 01:01:17 PM
Green v Serong v Hill
Stuck on this too. Hill allows that defensive cover and should play most weeks. Easy trade for BZT sitting on my bench.
Green looked so good last week but does he play regularly? Plus it’ll be Pickett making way who still has some money to make.
Serong I may stay clear of for now.
Viney to Mitchell or Duncan?
Only reason not going Boak yet is high BE and likely tag this week.
Dangerfield vs Mitchell vs Oliver?
Rowell replacement.. Wanting to get one more proven mid in for now, then see what happens with my last two spots.
Quote from: jfitty on July 08, 2020, 09:26:03 PM
Dangerfield vs Mitchell vs Oliver?
Rowell replacement.. Wanting to get one more proven mid in for now, then see what happens with my last two spots.
Mitchell will be the most consistent
Quote from: Wanderer on July 08, 2020, 09:38:08 PM
Quote from: jfitty on July 08, 2020, 09:26:03 PM
Dangerfield vs Mitchell vs Oliver?
Rowell replacement.. Wanting to get one more proven mid in for now, then see what happens with my last two spots.
Mitchell will be the most consistent
Carrying a sore shoulder
Quote from: frenzy on July 08, 2020, 10:28:41 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on July 08, 2020, 09:38:08 PM
Quote from: jfitty on July 08, 2020, 09:26:03 PM
Dangerfield vs Mitchell vs Oliver?
Rowell replacement.. Wanting to get one more proven mid in for now, then see what happens with my last two spots.
Mitchell will be the most consistent
Carrying a sore shoulder
Easily Mitchell
Quote from: billnats on July 05, 2020, 12:24:00 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 04, 2020, 01:01:17 PM
Green v Serong v Hill
Stuck on this too. Hill allows that defensive cover and should play most weeks. Easy trade for BZT sitting on my bench.
Green looked so good last week but does he play regularly? Plus it’ll be Pickett making way who still has some money to make.
Serong I may stay clear of for now.
Hill plays most weeks - if he can
Green may play - irregularly
Serong may get more games - when at home
Again it depends on the objectives, to make money buy low (rookie) sell high (cash cow)
IMO none of these are a season hold
Yeo or Shiel
Would be going for Shiel. He’s a big POD as everyone seems to be going for Yeo, scoring very well, and all the underlying numbers are looking good.
Looks like he’s worth the 100k more than Yeo.
Quote from: IntegralX on July 09, 2020, 01:39:20 AM
Would be going for Shiel. He’s a big POD as everyone seems to be going for Yeo, scoring very well, and all the underlying numbers are looking good.
Looks like he’s worth the 100k more than Yeo.
Is Shiels score effected when Merrett comes back though?
Maynard V Haynes V J Lloyd
Riddley, Yeo or Whitfield?
Quote from: bkimm32 on July 09, 2020, 12:44:16 PM
Quote from: IntegralX on July 09, 2020, 01:39:20 AM
Would be going for Shiel. He’s a big POD as everyone seems to be going for Yeo, scoring very well, and all the underlying numbers are looking good.
Looks like he’s worth the 100k more than Yeo.
Is Shiels score effected when Merrett comes back though?
Maynard V Haynes V J Lloyd
FWIW I went Lloyd mainly due to him feeling like the safest bet.
Quote from: benharris222 on July 09, 2020, 06:59:06 PM
Riddley, Yeo or Whitfield?
I am going Ridley this week mainly due to him having a better chance being in top 6-8 defenders this season vs Yeo being in top 8-10 mids IMO. Ridley also has the lowest BE. I already have Whitfield and you can always get him next week because his BE is higher than Ridley's.
Aarts + Lloyd vs. Whitfield + Doedee
Quote from: Wanderer on July 09, 2020, 07:30:56 PM
Quote from: benharris222 on July 09, 2020, 06:59:06 PM
Riddley, Yeo or Whitfield?
I am going Ridley this week mainly due to him having a better chance being in top 6-8 defenders this season vs Yeo being in top 8-10 mids IMO. Ridley also has the lowest BE. I already have Whitfield and you can always get him next week because his BE is higher than Ridley's.
With rivers out I have to go Ridley now. You can still get Yeo next week anyway cause he won't go up much money
Quote from: SilverLion on July 09, 2020, 07:42:20 PM
Aarts + Lloyd vs. Whitfield + Doedee
I brought in Aarts and Lloyd this week
Quote from: TommyC on July 09, 2020, 08:11:57 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 09, 2020, 07:42:20 PM
Aarts + Lloyd vs. Whitfield + Doedee
I brought in Aarts and Lloyd this week
Hard one, could go either way.
I would prob lean toward Whit/Doe only because 1 is a keeper and the other MAY end up being a keeper.
With Simpson looking good I would prefer him over Aarts.
Simpkin or Steele
I dont really know, maybe these stats might help.
Simpkin is DPP, ceiling seems greater????
(https://i.gyazo.com/56e0c8f5bf2c3235813186161686e8e7.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/ccc32cb0a11ba74e3842a1e47c9c384d.png)
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 10, 2020, 05:45:55 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.
Butler vs Hamill?
Quote from: Thewizz71 on July 10, 2020, 07:32:22 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 10, 2020, 05:45:55 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.
Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
i think he means Louis Butler Ringo, toss a coin i reckon
(https://i.gyazo.com/55bbae71e6ba90221d40d808c9a5916d.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/a973556b245a34c7e289f2deafe9c43a.png)
Treloar/Simpkin or Mitchell
Quote from: OZDocker on July 10, 2020, 07:43:11 PM
i think he means Louis Butler Ringo, toss a coin i reckon
Ah case of the mistaken Butler :D and don't call me Ringo
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 07:37:01 PM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on July 10, 2020, 07:32:22 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 10, 2020, 05:45:55 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.
Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 07:45:25 PM
Quote from: OZDocker on July 10, 2020, 07:43:11 PM
i think he means Louis Butler Ringo, toss a coin i reckon
Ah case of the mistaken Butler :D and don't call me Ringo
oooopss, sorry dunno what i was looking at :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[
Quote from: OZDocker on July 10, 2020, 07:49:08 PM
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 07:37:01 PM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on July 10, 2020, 07:32:22 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 10, 2020, 05:45:55 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.
Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Both are batting above their previous avg's was leaning to Haynes geez I hate these type of choices ???
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 07:55:34 PM
Quote from: OZDocker on July 10, 2020, 07:49:08 PM
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 07:37:01 PM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on July 10, 2020, 07:32:22 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 10, 2020, 05:45:55 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.
Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Both are batting above their previous avg's was leaning to Haynes geez I hate these type of choices ???
Same decision for me. I was all set for Haynes, but the forecast rain on the GC is leaning me back towards Maynard. Need the league win. Hope it doesn’t bite me on the arse, like most last minute trade changes do!
Quote from: no eye deer on July 10, 2020, 08:04:45 PM
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 07:55:34 PM
Quote from: OZDocker on July 10, 2020, 07:49:08 PM
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 07:37:01 PM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on July 10, 2020, 07:32:22 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 10, 2020, 05:45:55 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.
Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Both are batting above their previous avg's was leaning to Haynes geez I hate these type of choices ???
Same decision for me. I was all set for Haynes, but the forecast rain on the GC is leaning me back towards Maynard. Need the league win. Hope it doesn’t bite me on the arse, like most last minute trade changes do!
It's a bit wet ATM in Sydney but might clear now you have me checking GC weather forecasts ;D
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 08:13:43 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on July 10, 2020, 08:04:45 PM
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 07:55:34 PM
Quote from: OZDocker on July 10, 2020, 07:49:08 PM
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 07:37:01 PM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on July 10, 2020, 07:32:22 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 10, 2020, 05:45:55 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.
Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Both are batting above their previous avg's was leaning to Haynes geez I hate these type of choices ???
Same decision for me. I was all set for Haynes, but the forecast rain on the GC is leaning me back towards Maynard. Need the league win. Hope it doesn’t bite me on the arse, like most last minute trade changes do!
It's a bit wet ATM in Sydney but might clear now you have me checking GC weather forecasts ;D
>:( >:( :( >:( >:(
Why don’t I ever learn?
Quote from: no eye deer on July 10, 2020, 09:50:08 PM
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 08:13:43 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on July 10, 2020, 08:04:45 PM
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 07:55:34 PM
Quote from: OZDocker on July 10, 2020, 07:49:08 PM
Quote from: shaker on July 10, 2020, 07:37:01 PM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on July 10, 2020, 07:32:22 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 10, 2020, 05:45:55 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.
Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Both are batting above their previous avg's was leaning to Haynes geez I hate these type of choices ???
Same decision for me. I was all set for Haynes, but the forecast rain on the GC is leaning me back towards Maynard. Need the league win. Hope it doesn’t bite me on the arse, like most last minute trade changes do!
It's a bit wet ATM in Sydney but might clear now you have me checking GC weather forecasts ;D
>:( >:( :( >:( >:(
Why don’t I ever learn?
I resisted him.
Luke Parker vs Jack Steele and why?
NicNat or Pittonet on field in draft?
Trade Green (2nd time I have owned him :'( ) or McInerney
Quote from: Wanderer on July 11, 2020, 01:31:43 PM
NicNat or Pittonet on field in draft?
I'm fielding Nic Nat and I have both.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 16, 2020, 07:39:23 PM
Trade Green (2nd time I have owned him :'( ) or McInerney
It's worrying McInerney can't get a game with JPK and Heeney out, but I'd probably trade Green. You can't trust the Giants
Quote from: Mat0369 on July 16, 2020, 08:05:44 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on July 11, 2020, 01:31:43 PM
NicNat or Pittonet on field in draft?
I'm fielding Nic Nat and I have both.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 16, 2020, 07:39:23 PM
Trade Green (2nd time I have owned him :'( ) or McInerney
It's worrying McInerney can't get a game with JPK and Heeney out, but I'd probably trade Green. You can't trust the Giants
McInerney named E Green not bye bye Green again for me as well.
Quote from: shaker on July 16, 2020, 08:10:16 PM
Quote from: Mat0369 on July 16, 2020, 08:05:44 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on July 11, 2020, 01:31:43 PM
NicNat or Pittonet on field in draft?
I'm fielding Nic Nat and I have both.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 16, 2020, 07:39:23 PM
Trade Green (2nd time I have owned him :'( ) or McInerney
It's worrying McInerney can't get a game with JPK and Heeney out, but I'd probably trade Green. You can't trust the Giants
McInerney named E Green not bye bye Green again for me as well.
yep it hurts having to trade him again
Is Maynard score tonight the most over inflated score of the year? Done close to didly squat tonight
Bennell v Pickett?
Need to play one. Thinking Pickett.
Quote from: Thewizz71 on July 16, 2020, 11:32:54 PM
Bennell v Pickett?
Need to play one. Thinking Pickett.
I like Bennell. Although pick pickett cause you'll regret it if he does well.
Take Noble 62 and trade Starcevich to Rankine?
Or play Starcevich?
Quote from: Hazza09 on July 17, 2020, 01:44:32 AM
Take Noble 62 and trade Starcevich to Rankine?
Or play Starcevich?
This is exactly where I'm at, at the moment. I think Starc is gone! Gives me room to double upgrade next week, and Noble should hold his spot after that. Only had one clanger, and looked clean.
Quote from: Hazza09 on July 17, 2020, 01:44:32 AM
Take Noble 62 and trade Starcevich to Rankine?
Or play Starcevich?
Depends what you main goal is.
IMO Starcevich has the better JS going forward, as although his scores have been poor the last couple of weeks, he has played his role for the team. Noble was only a late in for Cox because of the weather. Could be straight out again next week. Starcevich also has DPP.
Having said that, if you are going to trade out Starcevich soon regardless, then this week is probably the week to do it. Has only had two scores significantly above 62, whilst 3 have been well below. Has only had one score for the year above his BE of 93, so significant chances he loses money this week as well
Starcevich > Jayden short
Find me a defender or forward worth bringing in up to 477k instead?
Whitfield or BSmith?
I took out their injury affected games. 99.5 Vs 103.6 average. Not a huge difference but it does save $61,800 and avoids the upcoming bye GWS face (though isn't really a deal breaker).
Sicily + Whitfield vs. Doedee + Taylor Adams
$508k to burn.
Coniglio vs Yeo vs Higgins
I have Cogs been disappointing I would go Higgins
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 22, 2020, 10:28:29 PM
$508k to burn.
Coniglio vs Yeo vs Higgins
Greenwood, Smith or Petracca
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 22, 2020, 10:28:29 PM
$508k to burn.
Coniglio vs Yeo vs Higgins
Triple yuck to be honest. Either go with a top dog you don't have like Treloar, or I'd rather go Parker than any of those, or even a forward you don't have to swing later.
Quote from: whynot102 on July 23, 2020, 10:32:30 AM
Greenwood, Smith or Petracca
Greenwood > Petracca >> Smith
ROB or English
Don't say Gawn...I'm resigned to not having him or getting him in later if the opportunity arrises, but I must get Pitto out.
Leaning towards ROB as I don't think English has a great game tonight and the extra money lets me make another upgrade.
Quote from: jvalles69 on July 23, 2020, 03:24:06 PM
ROB or English
Don't say Gawn...I'm resigned to not having him or getting him in later if the opportunity arrises, but I must get Pitto out.
Leaning towards ROB as I don't think English has a great game tonight and the extra money lets me make another upgrade.
Hasn't ROB got the three G's, Gawn,Grundy,Goldy after this week's match?
Quote from: Wanderer on July 23, 2020, 04:05:08 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on July 23, 2020, 03:24:06 PM
ROB or English
Don't say Gawn...I'm resigned to not having him or getting him in later if the opportunity arrises, but I must get Pitto out.
Leaning towards ROB as I don't think English has a great game tonight and the extra money lets me make another upgrade.
Hasn't ROB got the three G's, Gawn,Grundy,Goldy after this week's match?
I think they all have a combination of each other, but you could be right, I don't think that overly effects his scores though as he's not a dud ruck.
Ah you're right, and he sucked against them all last year. :-\
Quote from: whynot102 on July 23, 2020, 10:32:30 AM
Greenwood, Smith or Petracca
I would go Petracca just for the bonus points of not having a bye. Could be two tons difference right there.
Trading Taylor or King?. Feel Taylor can score higher but also likely to lose more money.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 23, 2020, 07:50:41 PM
Trading Taylor or King?. Feel Taylor can score higher but also likely to lose more money.
Taylor's injury affected score will be out of his rolling average after this week, so his BE will go back down.
Personally I would trade King.
If Sturt doesn't play I can loop Budaricks 60 and put Taylor on the pine. Hoping Taylor scores well due to his BE but a guaranteed 60 is tempting.
Quote from: Ingram on July 23, 2020, 11:14:01 PM
If Sturt doesn't play I can loop Budaricks 60 and put Taylor on the pine. Hoping Taylor scores well due to his BE but a guaranteed 60 is tempting.
I'd love Sturt to play just so he can make some cash. Id take a punt on Taylor (even though 60 is a solid score for a rookie).
I have bud on the mid bench so the only 2 rookies i can put on the bench for his score is Simpson and Pickett.
Realised Simpkin could be a late out so. mihht
Quote from: Ingram on July 23, 2020, 11:57:32 PM
Realised Simpkin could be a late out so. mihht
Id love to know before tomorrow nights game so i could switch him with Whitfield into the mids
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 24, 2020, 12:00:59 AM
Quote from: Ingram on July 23, 2020, 11:57:32 PM
Realised Simpkin could be a late out so. mihht
Id love to know before tomorrow nights game so i could switch him with Whitfield into the mids
Haha yes I'm doing the same is what I was trying to say.
Quote from: SilverLion on July 24, 2020, 11:31:27 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 22, 2020, 07:45:25 PM
Sicily + Whitfield vs. Doedee + Taylor Adams
Sicily BE 28, Whitfield BE 67, Doedee BE 28, Adams BE 108
You can wait on Adams because his price won't go up too much.
Sicily and Whitfield most likely to be top 6 in their positions and their price will go up.
The other option is to go Whitfield and Doedee and save 90k, then get Sicily after his round 10 bye.
Coniglio 500k
Zorko 487k
Martin 469k
Sicily 520k
Ridley 515k
Crisp 485k
I think Martin is my least favourite of those guys, but what about the other guys, which would you rather? Looking at Zorkos last 16 scores last year he didn’t score below 85 and tonned up 12 times.
Edit - Sorry he had a 61 in there.
Quote from: North Melbournes Finest on July 24, 2020, 01:02:07 PM
Coniglio 500k
Zorko 487k
Martin 469k
Sicily 520k
Ridley 515k
Crisp 485k
I think Martin is my least favourite of those guys, but what about the other guys, which would you rather? Looking at Zorkos last 16 scores last year he didn’t score below 85 and tonned up 12 times.
Edit - Sorry he had a 61 in there.
I'd go Sicily or Cogs. 4/5 of his last scores have been over 113. Although as a Coniglio owner I'm hoping he is beginning to find some form .
Quote from: North Melbournes Finest on July 24, 2020, 01:02:07 PM
Coniglio 500k
Zorko 487k
Martin 469k
Sicily 520k
Ridley 515k
Crisp 485k
I think Martin is my least favourite of those guys, but what about the other guys, which would you rather? Looking at Zorkos last 16 scores last year he didn’t score below 85 and tonned up 12 times.
Edit - Sorry he had a 61 in there.
If you don't care about his upcoming bye, then I would go Sicily because he will be the most likely to finish in the top 6 of his position out of that bunch. I also like Ridley for the fact that he has no byes and could finish in the top 6-8 defenders.
Thanks for your advice guys. I’m starting to like Coniglio. He has some stinkers but he’s very unlikely to be tagged with the other GWS Jets, he never has to face up against De Boer. I also think that this is a year where you should look for guys that are priced well below their potential, not when they’re at their price high for what they can produce. Like Stewart and Duncan are upcoming guys who will be well priced below their actual average. Think I’ll go with Nigs.
Short v crisp?
Quote from: North Melbournes Finest on July 24, 2020, 02:49:53 PM
Thanks for your advice guys. I’m starting to like Coniglio. He has some stinkers but he’s very unlikely to be tagged with the other GWS Jets, he never has to face up against De Boer. I also think that this is a year where you should look for guys that are priced well below their potential, not when they’re at their price high for what they can produce. Like Stewart and Duncan are upcoming guys who will be well priced below their actual average. Think I’ll go with Nigs.
thought cogs was spending time up forward
Quote from: jvalles69 on July 23, 2020, 03:24:06 PM
ROB or English
Don't say Gawn...I'm resigned to not having him or getting him in later if the opportunity arrises, but I must get Pitto out.
Leaning towards ROB as I don't think English has a great game tonight and the extra money lets me make another upgrade.
hope you went ROB jv
How about Mayes vs Simpson?
I know diff positions but Mitch Georgiades or Will Day?
Quote from: timtim on July 24, 2020, 08:13:48 PM
I know diff positions but Mitch Georgiades or Will Day?
Day no contest. Georgie is could very well be a one week special appearance...I don't see him keeping Westhoff out unless he does something special.
Simpson or Bennel?
Got a new one
Crisp v Luke Ryan?
Quote from: duff100au on July 25, 2020, 11:26:54 AM
Got a new one
Crisp v Luke Ryan?
I have had Ryan the last 2 seasons. A little but of the ups n downs.
If priced the same I would go Crisp, although prob not as high of a ceiling.
Quote from: tkringle on July 25, 2020, 11:24:57 AM
Simpson or Bennel?
Surely Simpson sees more of it with the Cat's outs.
Quote from: HoleMeal on July 25, 2020, 11:33:13 AM
Quote from: duff100au on July 25, 2020, 11:26:54 AM
Got a new one
Crisp v Luke Ryan?
I have had Ryan the last 2 seasons. A little but of the ups n downs.
If priced the same I would go Crisp, although prob not as high of a ceiling.
Crisp
Ryan too up and down for me
Quote from: timtim on July 25, 2020, 12:41:59 PM
Quote from: HoleMeal on July 25, 2020, 11:33:13 AM
Quote from: duff100au on July 25, 2020, 11:26:54 AM
Got a new one
Crisp v Luke Ryan?
I have had Ryan the last 2 seasons. A little but of the ups n downs.
If priced the same I would go Crisp, although prob not as high of a ceiling.
Crisp
Ryan too up and down for me
Agree, Ryan can pump out a few low scores from time to time.
Quote from: Wanderer on July 24, 2020, 11:57:30 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 24, 2020, 11:31:27 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 22, 2020, 07:45:25 PM
Sicily + Whitfield vs. Doedee + Taylor Adams
Sicily BE 28, Whitfield BE 67, Doedee BE 28, Adams BE 108
You can wait on Adams because his price won't go up too much.
Sicily and Whitfield most likely to be top 6 in their positions and their price will go up.
The other option is to go Whitfield and Doedee and save 90k, then get Sicily after his round 10 bye.
Ended up going Sicily and Whitfield.
First bit of good luck I've had all year.
Quote from: SilverLion on July 27, 2020, 01:59:32 AM
Quote from: Wanderer on July 24, 2020, 11:57:30 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 24, 2020, 11:31:27 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 22, 2020, 07:45:25 PM
Sicily + Whitfield vs. Doedee + Taylor Adams
Sicily BE 28, Whitfield BE 67, Doedee BE 28, Adams BE 108
You can wait on Adams because his price won't go up too much.
Sicily and Whitfield most likely to be top 6 in their positions and their price will go up.
The other option is to go Whitfield and Doedee and save 90k, then get Sicily after his round 10 bye.
Ended up going Sicily and Whitfield.
First bit of good luck I've had all year.
It was the smartest move, getting two of the best top 6 in their respective positions and at low BE's. Well done!
Ridley vs Daniel
Parker vs Gaff vs Zerrett
Quote from: IntegralX on July 28, 2020, 01:57:28 AM
Ridley vs Daniel
Parker vs Gaff vs Zerrett
Prob Daniel > Ridley (just). I have Ridley and very happy but Daniel does have potential tonget a lot of the ball
Gaff > Parker > Zerrett
Treloar vs Macrae vs Josh Kelly
Greene vs Bailey Smith (worth the extra $70k)?
Lloyd 590k - 115 ave
Haynes 550k - 111 ave
Ridley 520k - 110 ave
Saad 490k - 102ave
Genuinely torn up on this one. I'd love to bring in Lloyd, but for that much more than Haynes and Ridley is he worth spending all that extra money?
Quote from: North Melbournes Finest on July 29, 2020, 11:14:47 AM
Lloyd 590k - 115 ave
Haynes 550k - 111 ave
Ridley 520k - 110 ave
Saad 490k - 102ave
Genuinely torn up on this one. I'd love to bring in Lloyd, but for that much more than Haynes and Ridley is he worth spending all that extra money?
You have to get Lloyd at some stage, but maybe wait until after his round 11 bye.
With Haynes, not sure how Zach Williams will impact him, and he also has a bye in round 11.
Ridley and Saad both have the benefit of no byes, but Ridley is better IMO. He has gone under 100 twice and his lowest score has been 92. Saad's lowest score has been 80.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 29, 2020, 09:10:45 AM
Treloar vs Macrae vs Josh Kelly
Greene vs Bailey Smith (worth the extra $70k)?
Macrae easily due to durability, then Kelly, Treloar. I think Treloar might be managed at some point given condensed schedule. Kelly also has the bye in round 11.
Bailey Smith a no-brainer over Toby Greene. The $70k savings is huge and Toby misses way too many games.
Williamson with BE of 66 and will drop in price and he has a bye coming up. He has to go. Who will replace him?
McPherson or McKay
Close vs Georgiades
Consider JS, scoring potential as well as price.
Lads I’m really needing a bit of advice
I still haven’t cashed in on my
Emergency ruck Naismith and Ive already got Grundy and Gawn.
My question is, is it worth getting someone like Draper who is talked about as possibly getting a game soon who could potentially make me a bit of coin or just maximise the cash I could get now and get Conroy at 102k saving me 20k?
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 29, 2020, 04:05:58 PM
Lads I’m really needing a bit of advice
I still haven’t cashed in on my
Emergency ruck Naismith and Ive already got Grundy and Gawn.
My question is, is it worth getting someone like Draper who is talked about as possibly getting a game soon who could potentially make me a bit of coin or just maximise the cash I could get now and get Conroy at 102k saving me 20k?
I'd only pick Draper if he was named. If you are desperate for a rookie ruckman you could get Brooksby if he is named.
Pick two to play out of Georgiades, Taylor and Close?
Quote from: tkringle on July 29, 2020, 10:53:33 PM
Pick two to play out of Georgiades, Taylor and Close?
I'd field Georgiades then one of Taylor or Close. I'm leaning towards Taylor as roos are playing crows.
Parker v Duncan v Merrett
Quote from: duff100au on July 29, 2020, 11:44:01 PM
Parker v Duncan v Merrett
I'm picking Duncan as I don't have any other Geelong players. That's the only way I'm splitting him and Parker at the moment.
Although Merrett has already had a bye, I don't trust him as much as the other two. Duncan is cheap because of injury whereas Merrett is cheap because of 2 scores of 78, 68 for no real reason. Merrett also more likely to get attention, particularly after his big game last week.
Quote from: Rusty00 on July 30, 2020, 10:08:40 AM
Quote from: duff100au on July 29, 2020, 11:44:01 PM
Parker v Duncan v Merrett
I'm picking Duncan as I don't have any other Geelong players. That's the only way I'm splitting him and Parker at the moment.
Although Merrett has already had a bye, I don't trust him as much as the other two. Duncan is cheap because of injury whereas Merrett is cheap because of 2 scores of 78, 68 for no real reason. Merrett also more likely to get attention, particularly after his big game last week.
+1 Added to that, Parker's next three rounds include Steele and DeBoer possible tags and a bye.
Tobe Watson vs Andrew McPherson. A little skinny down back and really need them to play in the coming weeks......
Quote from: Woppa15 on July 30, 2020, 04:38:11 PM
Tobe Watson vs Andrew McPherson. A little skinny down back and really need them to play in the coming weeks......
I am also a little thin down back and I am going Watson (if selected) for max money in the kitty, McPherson on the other hand may of better JS
Quote from: Woppa15 on July 30, 2020, 04:38:11 PM
Tobe Watson vs Andrew McPherson. A little skinny down back and really need them to play in the coming weeks......
At this stage I'm going McPherson. Would love the extra money but I reckon McPherson's JS is pretty good which is what I need for a D7 to avoid anymore donuts down back, like last week.
Noble v Starc. Trading 1 this week and the other next week. Am fielding which ever one i keep.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 30, 2020, 05:38:47 PM
Noble v Starc. Trading 1 this week and the other next week. Am fielding which ever one i keep.
Noble BE = 64
Starcevich BE = 49
Really tough call.....
Quote from: Fid on July 30, 2020, 05:54:31 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 30, 2020, 05:38:47 PM
Noble v Starc. Trading 1 this week and the other next week. Am fielding which ever one i keep.
Noble BE = 64
Starcevich BE = 49
Really tough call.....
So it's Noble vs Fremantle in Perth or Starcevich vs Essendon in Carrara. No rain for both games. Starcevich is based in Queensland. Noble far away from home. Starcevich lower BE. I would go Starcevich.
Starcevich averages 67 in QLD. Last week he only scored 48 at the venue he is playing this week but it was in the wet.
Noble averaging 54 at Optus.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 29, 2020, 10:49:26 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 29, 2020, 04:05:58 PM
Lads I’m really needing a bit of advice
I still haven’t cashed in on my
Emergency ruck Naismith and Ive already got Grundy and Gawn.
My question is, is it worth getting someone like Draper who is talked about as possibly getting a game soon who could potentially make me a bit of coin or just maximise the cash I could get now and get Conroy at 102k saving me 20k?
I'd only pick Draper if he was named. If you are desperate for a rookie ruckman you could get Brooksby if he is named.
Brooksby @ $117.3K would be a good choice IMO
Quote from: RoughRed on July 30, 2020, 07:07:51 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 29, 2020, 10:49:26 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 29, 2020, 04:05:58 PM
Lads I’m really needing a bit of advice
I still haven’t cashed in on my
Emergency ruck Naismith and Ive already got Grundy and Gawn.
My question is, is it worth getting someone like Draper who is talked about as possibly getting a game soon who could potentially make me a bit of coin or just maximise the cash I could get now and get Conroy at 102k saving me 20k?
I'd only pick Draper if he was named. If you are desperate for a rookie ruckman you could get Brooksby if he is named.
Brooksby @ $117.3K would be a good choice IMO
Get Draper now
Quote from: Wanderer on July 30, 2020, 06:48:13 PM
Quote from: Fid on July 30, 2020, 05:54:31 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 30, 2020, 05:38:47 PM
Noble v Starc. Trading 1 this week and the other next week. Am fielding which ever one i keep.
Noble BE = 64
Starcevich BE = 49
Really tough call.....
So it's Noble vs Fremantle in Perth or Starcevich vs Essendon in Carrara. No rain for both games. Starcevich is based in Queensland. Noble far away from home. Starcevich lower BE. I would go Starcevich.
Starcevich averages 67 in QLD. Last week he only scored 48 at the venue he is playing this week but it was in the wet.
Noble averaging 54 at Optus.
Thanks mate
Quote from: RoughRed on July 30, 2020, 07:07:51 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on July 29, 2020, 10:49:26 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on July 29, 2020, 04:05:58 PM
Lads I’m really needing a bit of advice
I still haven’t cashed in on my
Emergency ruck Naismith and Ive already got Grundy and Gawn.
My question is, is it worth getting someone like Draper who is talked about as possibly getting a game soon who could potentially make me a bit of coin or just maximise the cash I could get now and get Conroy at 102k saving me 20k?
I'd only pick Draper if he was named. If you are desperate for a rookie ruckman you could get Brooksby if he is named.
Brooksby @ $117.3K would be a good choice IMO
Looks like Draper now :)
Can only get one of Stewart or Duncan.
Have one spot left in defence, but I prefer Haynes over Stewart, but Stewart very cheap.
Have 3 spots left in mids, so Duncan will be handy.
Who would you get?
Quote from: Wanderer on August 04, 2020, 01:48:56 PM
Stewart vs Duncan?
I have 5 keepers already in defence, but don't have Haynes, Maynard, Daniel. If I get Stewart, then I give up on Haynes, who is the one I really want, but Stewart is cheap.
I only have 5 keepers in the mids, so Duncan will come in handy, and will leave me with two mid spots to see who the best available will be in the next few weeks.
Leaning towards Duncan, even though Stewart is so cheap.
I’d go for Duncan mate. As you said you only have 5 keepers in the mids, so that’s a no brainer. Looking at his scores you can’t go past him. Stewart is a good pick too but you should still get him next week for around 500k..
Quote from: tommy10 on August 04, 2020, 02:58:25 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on August 04, 2020, 01:48:56 PM
Stewart vs Duncan?
I have 5 keepers already in defence, but don't have Haynes, Maynard, Daniel. If I get Stewart, then I give up on Haynes, who is the one I really want, but Stewart is cheap.
I only have 5 keepers in the mids, so Duncan will come in handy, and will leave me with two mid spots to see who the best available will be in the next few weeks.
Leaning towards Duncan, even though Stewart is so cheap.
I’d go for Duncan mate. As you said you only have 5 keepers in the mids, so that’s a no brainer. Looking at his scores you can’t go past him. Stewart is a good pick too but you should still get him next week for around 500k..
Yeah, I agree. Thanks for the advice.
It's looking like I'll have to keep 1 of Hurn or Doedee for the rest of the season. Both have a bye to come.
Who is likely to score more from here?
Mitch Duncan vs Dustin Martin!?
Quote from: Wanderer on August 04, 2020, 03:29:32 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on August 04, 2020, 02:58:25 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on August 04, 2020, 01:48:56 PM
Stewart vs Duncan?
I have 5 keepers already in defence, but don't have Haynes, Maynard, Daniel. If I get Stewart, then I give up on Haynes, who is the one I really want, but Stewart is cheap.
I only have 5 keepers in the mids, so Duncan will come in handy, and will leave me with two mid spots to see who the best available will be in the next few weeks.
Leaning towards Duncan, even though Stewart is so cheap.
I’d go for Duncan mate. As you said you only have 5 keepers in the mids, so that’s a no brainer. Looking at his scores you can’t go past him. Stewart is a good pick too but you should still get him next week for around 500k..
Yeah, I agree. Thanks for the advice.
Was a good call. Duncan, although didn't set the world on fire, still managed to score over 100 whilst Stewart had a below par game.
Stewart will remain cheap for those who still want to get him next week.
Quote from: MontyJnr on August 04, 2020, 07:04:59 PM
It's looking like I'll have to keep 1 of Hurn or Doedee for the rest of the season. Both have a bye to come.
Who is likely to score more from here?
Doedee, if he can stay on the park.
Quote from: frenzy on August 06, 2020, 03:41:42 PM
Quote from: MontyJnr on August 04, 2020, 07:04:59 PM
It's looking like I'll have to keep 1 of Hurn or Doedee for the rest of the season. Both have a bye to come.
Who is likely to score more from here?
Doedee, if he can stay on the park.
I have been expecting for Hurns scoring to deteriorate in the last few years but it hadn't happened. Although Hurn is more durable than Doedee, he has only scored now once over 100 since rd 1 compared to doedee's 4.
Shuey Vs T.Adams?
Saad Vs Maynard
Shuey [$488k] vs Simpkin [$397k]
Shuey 110 ave if you remove the game when he did his hammy
Shuey or Gaff
Rankine & Ruscoe vs Budarick & Watson
Quote from: whynot102 on August 08, 2020, 11:41:37 AM
Shuey or Gaff
Shuey looks more consistent than Gaff to me
Shuey + Wingard + dead rookie v Titch + Rankine + Watson
Are Cripps and Shuey right now worth it over bringing in only one of Macrae/Oliver? Would have one more mid upgrade to make if I go Cripps/Shuey route.
Mitchell or Fyfe
Quote from: whynot102 on August 08, 2020, 04:00:24 PM
Mitchell or Fyfe
Mitchell. Fyfe is injury prone and still possibly has money to lose
Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on August 08, 2020, 03:18:06 PM
Are Cripps and Shuey right now worth it over bringing in only one of Macrae/Oliver? Would have one more mid upgrade to make if I go Cripps/Shuey route.
name of the game is buy low sell high. take shuey/cripps
Quote from: crowls on August 08, 2020, 09:56:01 PM
Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on August 08, 2020, 03:18:06 PM
Are Cripps and Shuey right now worth it over bringing in only one of Macrae/Oliver? Would have one more mid upgrade to make if I go Cripps/Shuey route.
name of the game is buy low sell high. take shuey/cripps
Also value for money. Even though Neale has been expensive, since i finally two weeks ago he has provided me with 2 captain scores.
Greenwood or brayshaw?
Quote from: backpocket on August 09, 2020, 04:44:38 PM
Greenwood or brayshaw?
I'd go Brayshaw. Already had his bye, Greenwood's level seems to be slipping (no tons last 3 wks).
Zerrett (no bye) vs Mitch Duncan?
Ruscoe v Bytel?
Picking Ruscoe will allow me to swing him back to the backline in the future, although even though i havent seen him play i feel Bytel would be a better scorer. Thoughts?
Quote from: Samsturmfels on August 10, 2020, 06:27:04 PM
Ruscoe v Bytel?
Picking Ruscoe will allow me to swing him back to the backline in the future, although even though i havent seen him play i feel Bytel would be a better scorer. Thoughts?
reason i went ruscoe was for the dpp to def, i have close for dpp to fwds. coming into more byes, more resting players etc I want max flexibility. not sure what the points benefit or cash benefit could be calculated as and in six years of sc i have learnt flexiblity in team can cover a lot of holes/sins
shoenberg vs ruscoe
RD 12 mid trade in
Titch / Fyfe / Parker or Coniglio
Quote from: justaverage on August 12, 2020, 09:33:34 PM
RD 12 mid trade in
Titch / Fyfe / Parker or Coniglio
Fyfe I reckon, thinking he'll finish the year strong as he started
Quote from: jfitty on August 12, 2020, 10:09:08 PM
Quote from: justaverage on August 12, 2020, 09:33:34 PM
RD 12 mid trade in
Titch / Fyfe / Parker or Coniglio
Fyfe I reckon, thinking he'll finish the year strong as he started
Although id probs say Fyfe/Titch, Coniglio has a good draw coming up with the remaining teams left to play.
Is Lloyd worth the extra 80k and a potential trade over Haynes? Whichever one I bring in will be my last premo in defense.
Quote from: North Melbournes Finest on August 13, 2020, 03:16:33 PM
Is Lloyd worth the extra 80k and a potential trade over Haynes? Whichever one I bring in will be my last premo in defense.
Lloyd is easily the best SC defender, however it depends where you want to spend your cash. I have to trade Doedee this week but i feel im going to have to go someone under 500k like Williams to allow me to to other future upgrades.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on August 13, 2020, 03:31:45 PM
Quote from: North Melbournes Finest on August 13, 2020, 03:16:33 PM
Is Lloyd worth the extra 80k and a potential trade over Haynes? Whichever one I bring in will be my last premo in defense.
Lloyd is easily the best SC defender, however it depends where you want to spend your cash. I have to trade Doedee this week but i feel im going to have to go someone under 500k like Williams to allow me to to other future upgrades.
I took Haynes. I'll get LLLLLLLLoyd when one of my defenders goes down or has their bye.
Whitfield vs Fyfe?
Whitfield could continue rich vein of form and then be switched forward, while Fyfe is Fyfe, either go large or snap into pieces?
Leaning towards Fyfe.
Quote from: Thewizz71 on August 13, 2020, 04:57:22 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on August 13, 2020, 03:31:45 PM
Quote from: North Melbournes Finest on August 13, 2020, 03:16:33 PM
Is Lloyd worth the extra 80k and a potential trade over Haynes? Whichever one I bring in will be my last premo in defense.
Lloyd is easily the best SC defender, however it depends where you want to spend your cash. I have to trade Doedee this week but i feel im going to have to go someone under 500k like Williams to allow me to to other future upgrades.
I took Haynes. I'll get LLLLLLLLoyd when one of my defenders goes down or has their bye.
Whitfield vs Fyfe?
Whitfield could continue rich vein of form and then be switched forward, while Fyfe is Fyfe, either go large or snap into pieces?
Leaning towards Fyfe.
depends on your team structure but id probably go whitfield based on upcoming fixture.
Saad v Z.Williams?
also does anymore have any tips for my team?
http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,113948.0.html
Quote from: Samsturmfels on August 13, 2020, 05:13:42 PM
Saad v Z.Williams?
also does anymore have any tips for my team?
http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,113948.0.html
Z. williams
Ridley, Haynes, Daniel or Maynard?
Quote from: Qwerty7698 on August 13, 2020, 05:49:42 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on August 13, 2020, 05:13:42 PM
Saad v Z.Williams?
also does anymore have any tips for my team?
http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,113948.0.html
Z. williams
Ridley, Haynes, Daniel or Maynard?
Id go with one of Ridley and Haynes as they have had their byes. Id probably say Ridley due to price.
Ridley vs Laird? Leaning towards Ridley because of the bye situation.
Quote from: Joel20 on August 13, 2020, 07:44:56 PM
Ridley vs Laird? Leaning towards Ridley because of the bye situation.
I like Ridley. Seems to be playing a really good role. And the bye. But, Laird seems to be a bit of a magnet ATM. for the record, i have Ridley and not Laird.
To trade out: Doch vs Noble.
Duncan vs Fyfe?
Woodcock vs Sholl
Quote from: MontyJnr on August 14, 2020, 01:07:45 PM
Woodcock vs Sholl
With Doedee going down probably go with Sholl.
Quote from: shaker on August 14, 2020, 01:21:58 PM
Quote from: MontyJnr on August 14, 2020, 01:07:45 PM
Woodcock vs Sholl
With Doedee going down probably go with Sholl.
Sholl looked good and more likely to score ok vs Woodcock, who has the Cats and playing small forward.
Don't think Doedee going down really impacts Sholl one way or the other though? Different types of players.
Kicking myself I grabbed Schoenberg instead of Sholl
Trying to decide which two to drop out of Smith (Dogs), Smith (Dons) and Georgiades. I'm grabbing Fyfe and Walters and can afford regardless of which two I drop
Quote from: Mat0369 on August 14, 2020, 08:28:26 PM
Trying to decide which two to drop out of Smith (Dogs), Smith (Dons) and Georgiades. I'm grabbing Fyfe and Walters and can afford regardless of which two I drop
Debating the same. Apparently Smith ok and will play but Dunkley centre bounce attendances impacting Smith. Therefore with a BE of 99 I’m getting rid of him. Georgiades still more cash to make. I’d also get rid of Smith, although don’t follow Dons and don’t know if injuries to Zach will change his role?
Bailey had gone nuts in the first quarter every week and disappeared after that. That was pre Dunkley coming back. I feel it's bitting the wall a little but he is at least showing potential. He probably has to go with the bye at some point but was the most likely to give me premium points this week.
Dev played deep forward and needs to go. I'm over him so I locked him in. I didn't like the Georgiades match up so I feel like he wasn't going to go big either. I ended up trading those two in the end
Merett (last premo mid, will miss out on Oliver/Fyfe)
v
Walters (will allow me to pick a different premo mid next week)
v
Bytel (bank cash and do two upgrades next week)
v
Trac (but have to play one of Ruscoe/Schoenberg)
Fyfe [$575,600, Avg 116.6, 3 game Avg 108.7, BE 105] - Avg is 132.2 excluding the 71 and 84 in injury affected games
- Gun. In and out recently with hamstring, and Freo about to have a chunk of games with minimal days gap. Will be rested?
vs
Brayshaw [$574,400, Avg 107.4, 3 game Avg 130.7, BE 90]
- In red hot form, and also a Mid/Fwd which adds flexibility. Younger and may not be rested as likely? Will his form be impacted with Walters back?
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 15, 2020, 01:51:56 PM
Fyfe [$575,600, Avg 116.6, 3 game Avg 108.7, BE 105] - Avg is 132.2 excluding the 71 and 84 in injury affected games
- Gun. In and out recently with hamstring, and Freo about to have a chunk of games with minimal days gap. Will be rested?
vs
Brayshaw [$574,400, Avg 107.4, 3 game Avg 130.7, BE 90]
- In red hot form, and also a Mid/Fwd which adds flexibility. Younger and may not be rested as likely? Will his form be impacted with Walters back?
Fyfe easily for me. It hurts to pick Brayshaw considering i had him in rd 1.
now mine ^
Quote from: Samsturmfels on August 15, 2020, 01:57:53 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 15, 2020, 01:51:56 PM
Fyfe [$575,600, Avg 116.6, 3 game Avg 108.7, BE 105] - Avg is 132.2 excluding the 71 and 84 in injury affected games
- Gun. In and out recently with hamstring, and Freo about to have a chunk of games with minimal days gap. Will be rested?
vs
Brayshaw [$574,400, Avg 107.4, 3 game Avg 130.7, BE 90]
- In red hot form, and also a Mid/Fwd which adds flexibility. Younger and may not be rested as likely? Will his form be impacted with Walters back?
Fyfe easily for me. It hurts to pick Brayshaw considering i had him in rd 1.
now mine ^
I tend to agree. Just trying to do due diligence. Roll the dice and back in the gun
Hey guys,
Haven’t posted on here for a while.
Can’t decide between Saad and Williams for my last upgrade down back.
What is everyone’s thoughts?
Williams three tons in a row and a play maker
Quote from: Money Shot on August 18, 2020, 12:41:44 PM
Hey guys,
Haven’t posted on here for a while.
Can’t decide between Saad and Williams for my last upgrade down back.
What is everyone’s thoughts?
Quote from: Money Shot on August 18, 2020, 12:41:44 PM
Hey guys,
Haven’t posted on here for a while.
Can’t decide between Saad and Williams for my last upgrade down back.
What is everyone’s thoughts?
Weighing this decision up too. Sad has flown under the radar big time. Been very consistent
Quote from: quinny88 on August 18, 2020, 02:04:17 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on August 18, 2020, 12:41:44 PM
Hey guys,
Haven’t posted on here for a while.
Can’t decide between Saad and Williams for my last upgrade down back.
What is everyone’s thoughts?
Weighing this decision up too. Sad has flown under the radar big time. Been very consistent
I think Saad as well. I like the dash of both, but I think that Saad will be on the park more.
Lllllllllllloyd vs L Ryan to replace Sicily. Leaning towards Lloyd just for all his cheap touches.
I've had Saad for about 5-6 weeks now, one of those guys you don't have to think about, but doesn't have the high ceiling that Zwill does.
Thanks for the feedback guys!
Even if it hasn’t helped my decision ::)
Quote from: Money Shot on August 18, 2020, 06:47:50 PM
Thanks for the feedback guys!
Even if it hasn’t helped my decision ::)
If you have enough trades to take the risk on Williams, then do it. If you don't and you are risk averse, then go Saad.
I am getting Williams FWIW.
Greenwood vs Oscar to finish my forward line???
Quote from: Wanderer on August 18, 2020, 06:50:57 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on August 18, 2020, 06:47:50 PM
Thanks for the feedback guys!
Even if it hasn’t helped my decision ::)
If you have enough trades to take the risk on Williams, then do it. If you don't and you are risk averse, then go Saad.
I am getting Williams FWIW.
Yeah I’ve got some trades up the sleeve and I do think Williams has a higher ceiling.
Quote from: Wanderer on August 18, 2020, 06:50:57 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on August 18, 2020, 06:47:50 PM
Thanks for the feedback guys!
Even if it hasn’t helped my decision ::)
If you have enough trades to take the risk on Williams, then do it. If you don't and you are risk averse, then go Saad.
I am getting Williams FWIW.
I started Williams but I wouldn’t be bringing him in
Ryan vs Williams (and cash remaining).
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 19, 2020, 09:26:52 AM
Ryan vs Williams (and cash remaining).
I prefer Williams. He gives you more cash to spend elsewhere. Ryan is more likely to average more for rest of year but he will be playing away from Perth. Williams is more of an injury risk but i do prefer his fixture.
Williams [$487k] vs Witherden [$474k]
Williams last 3: 112, 105, 111
Witherden last 3: 85, 100, 101
Witherden scored a massive 170 in his first game back after being on outer. I assumed he was injured, but Fagan chose to play others before him.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 20, 2020, 03:49:27 PM
Williams [$487k] vs Witherden [$474k]
Williams last 3: 112, 105, 111
Witherden last 3: 85, 100, 101
Witherden scored a massive 170 in his first game back after being on outer. I assumed he was injured, but Fagan chose to play others before him.
With Witherden having the bye still I'd rather pick Williams.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on August 20, 2020, 03:56:31 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 20, 2020, 03:49:27 PM
Williams [$487k] vs Witherden [$474k]
Williams last 3: 112, 105, 111
Witherden last 3: 85, 100, 101
Witherden scored a massive 170 in his first game back after being on outer. I assumed he was injured, but Fagan chose to play others before him.
With Witherden having the bye still I'd rather pick Williams.
Good call, must admit I failed to check that. Hence the beauty of this forum! THANKS MATE
Parish (can also get angus) + Rankine (will trade out soon) + Foot v Walsh + Cameron + Reid
Have a lack of cash so can only get these sort of guys. Parish has had good recent form but worried about his fixture, while Walsh has an 108 5 game average. If i were to go with Walsh i have to sacrifice my rookies.
Thoughts?
Sam, are you talking about bringing in Rankine or Trading him? If I was you I would punt on Angus and bring in Foot.
Quote from: crowls on August 21, 2020, 05:31:14 PM
Sam, are you talking about bringing in Rankine or Trading him? If I was you I would punt on Angus and bring in Foot.
i am trading one of Cameron or Rankine this week. Rankine gives me more cash but would be more comfortable to field him.
Angus is basket case I stuck fat with him for too long last year. However putting scores out there and cheap as chips so worth the punt. Especially against Parish. Another bomber I thought would step up his consisentcy and increase his floor to 80+ this year. Why not Simkpin instead?
Quote from: crowls on August 21, 2020, 05:50:12 PM
Angus is basket case I stuck fat with him for too long last year. However putting scores out there and cheap as chips so worth the punt. Especially against Parish. Another bomber I thought would step up his consisentcy and increase his floor to 80+ this year. Why not Simkpin instead?
Thanks for the suggestion but I already have him.
basically if i go Aarts - Foot, i have 457k to spend on a forward or mid. If i were to trade Rankine instead of Cameron (who id have to field) id have 484.k to spend.
Caleb Daniel v Zak Williams?
Quote from: oh_lol on August 21, 2020, 07:14:51 PM
Caleb Daniel v Zak Williams?
Daniel for consistency and durability
Williams for ceiling
Williams be Witherden....?
Trading Gawn
Nic Nat v Goldy?
Quote from: B. on August 21, 2020, 08:06:53 PM
Trading Gawn
Nic Nat v Goldy?
Last week i would have said Nic Nat but he has now gone up 50k and a chance to be rested at some stage. If you have draper as cover id go Goldy.
Goldy & greenwood
Or
Marshall & Martin?
Zorko, Josh Kelly, Bont or Lyons
Quote from: whynot102 on August 21, 2020, 11:31:31 PM
Zorko, Josh Kelly, Bont or Lyons
kelly. Rest still have a bye
I like Kelly but already have Cogs, Haynes and Whitfield is this two many GWS players
Quote from: Samsturmfels on August 21, 2020, 11:41:50 PM
Quote from: whynot102 on August 21, 2020, 11:31:31 PM
Zorko, Josh Kelly, Bont or Lyons
kelly. Rest still have a bye
oliver vs petracca
Z Williams v Blicavs v L McDonald
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 22, 2020, 03:43:39 PM
Z Williams v Blicavs v L McDonald
Williams out of those I feel, save some cash.
Still deciding myself between Williams and Saad, Williams just feels like a bit of a boring pick!
Quote from: jfitty on August 22, 2020, 03:50:48 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 22, 2020, 03:43:39 PM
Z Williams v Blicavs v L McDonald
Williams out of those I feel, save some cash.
Still deciding myself between Williams and Saad, Williams just feels like a bit of a boring pick!
I thought the same. Just spent some time looking at L McDonald and his last 5 impressive: 122, 136, 95, 138, 119. Also has a Rd 15 bye which doesn’t count for finals [my focus]. Interests me greatly
Is Luke Ryan as final DEF premium worth the extra $100k compared to Haynes?
Quote from: barlowlove on August 25, 2020, 12:21:42 PM
Is Luke Ryan as final DEF premium worth the extra $100k compared to Haynes?
It depends how many other spots you need to upgrade and how many trades you have left. I'm against grabbing top priced players (and went against my advice once this season with Treloar). I feel it can backfire and guys will inevitably put in a stinker.
If you need to upgrade another forward or mid I'd pocket the 100k and grab the cheaper option. If it is your final upgrade for your team and your set on having Ryan just pull the trigger. The other thing to consider is it's a 5 round season right now. Do you think Ryan will outscore Haynes from this point on. If you think it's a wash I'd pocket the cash in case of emergency.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 22, 2020, 03:56:25 PM
Quote from: jfitty on August 22, 2020, 03:50:48 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 22, 2020, 03:43:39 PM
Z Williams v Blicavs v L McDonald
Williams out of those I feel, save some cash.
Still deciding myself between Williams and Saad, Williams just feels like a bit of a boring pick!
I thought the same. Just spent some time looking at L McDonald and his last 5 impressive: 122, 136, 95, 138, 119. Also has a Rd 15 bye which doesn’t count for finals [my focus]. Interests me greatly
tempted to do him as cheaper Lloyd option and then only need to upgrade ruck when Gawn is back.
zerret + maynard v shiel + mcdonald +30K 110+105 v 105 + 115
more potential upside scoring with mcdonald but downside risk of sheil and mcdonald is scary
Need some additional cash to upgrade ruck before last two finals. if option 2 have 242k in bank with 4 trades.
leaves me with 18 scorers assuming sholl, ruscoe and foot all get games in R15 bye.
Alternative is go for Lloyd now and hope I can generate cash out of Scholl, Close, Xerri, Ruscoe, Bytel with downgrades to 102k non scorers for Rnd 17/18 leaving no cover. I like to win leagues but not cash leagues this year and overall is more important to me.
Fyfe or Titch to finish my midfield??
Titch got both Fyfe to up and down only scored 86 last week Titch 132 quote author=quinny88 link=topic=113569.msg2012201#msg2012201 date=1598430208]
Fyfe or Titch to finish my midfield??
[/quote]
Lukosius, Jack Martin or Simpkin
Quote from: whynot102 on August 26, 2020, 08:34:39 PM
Lukosius, Jack Martin or Simpkin
Is there any love for Toby Greene, with no byes?
Lukosius for me. Seems like in classic “coming home with a wet sail going to break out next year “ form haha
But I’d try and get him as D6 because simpkin at his current price is way better value
Looking at last spot in the fwd line does that change opinions
Quote from: timtim on August 26, 2020, 09:02:15 PM
Lukosius for me. Seems like in classic “coming home with a wet sail going to break out next year “ form haha
But I’d try and get him as D6 because simpkin at his current price is way better value
Quote from: Fid on August 26, 2020, 08:53:06 PM
Quote from: whynot102 on August 26, 2020, 08:34:39 PM
Lukosius, Jack Martin or Simpkin
Is there any love for Toby Greene, with no byes?
I can see Greene getting a huge score against the crows (and GWS have a good fixture) although i am getting Jack Martin as i cant afford greene and he is averaging over 100 excluding his injury affected score.
Trying to decide between some cheaper defenders..
Lukosius vs Sheppard vs McGovern vs May
Could pay up for Maynard, but want to keep some cash in the bank if I can..
Quote from: jfitty on August 26, 2020, 10:51:46 PM
Trying to decide between some cheaper defenders..
Lukosius vs Sheppard vs McGovern vs May
Could pay up for Maynard, but want to keep some cash in the bank if I can..
Id go Lukosious if your not worried about byes. If not i like May or Mcgovern. 8 of the 9 last games for May have been over 90 which is pretty good
J. Martin 435k + 50K Vs Walters 485k this is for next week. Means having ~615k or ~575k to spend on final midfielder in Rnd 16.
Quote from: Ingram on August 27, 2020, 01:50:39 AM
J. Martin 435k + 50K Vs Walters 485k this is for next week. Means having ~615k or ~575k to spend on final midfielder in Rnd 16.
Might depend which midfielders you're eyeing off, but I'd be inclined to grab Walters..
For me:
Lukosious/Maynard and J Martin
vs
Sheppard and Greenwood
May and Mitchell
Or
Haynes and Parker?
Quote from: duff100au on August 27, 2020, 03:51:16 PM
May and Mitchell
Or
Haynes and Parker?
Have you considered McGovern as a POD instead of Haynes
Ended up picking Haynes so now I need to decide who out of
Parker v coniglio?
Quote from: duff100au on August 28, 2020, 01:35:28 PM
Ended up picking Haynes so now I need to decide who out of
Parker v coniglio?
Parker. Cogs far too inconsistent.
Quote from: duff100au on August 28, 2020, 01:35:28 PM
Ended up picking Haynes so now I need to decide who out of
Parker v coniglio?
Parker Cogs not only more inconsistent but has more competition for points.
If you have the emergency selected on 2 players in the same position, eg Aarts and Close, do you get both scores still?
Being best 18 players?
Or does the same apply as normal? Lowest emergency score?
Quote from: Hazza09 on August 28, 2020, 06:22:36 PM
If you have the emergency selected on 2 players in the same position, eg Aarts and Close, do you get both scores still?
Being best 18 players?
Or does the same apply as normal? Lowest emergency score?
Good question and now it is dangerous to assume but my thoughts are if you have 2 non players on the same line as the 2 emergencies both come on so long as you have nominated them as emergencies but if only one non player then lowest will count. That is basically the rules anyway. If both are in best 18 scores will count as well.
Quote from: Ringo on August 28, 2020, 06:58:36 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on August 28, 2020, 06:22:36 PM
If you have the emergency selected on 2 players in the same position, eg Aarts and Close, do you get both scores still?
Being best 18 players?
Or does the same apply as normal? Lowest emergency score?
Good question and now it is dangerous to assume but my thoughts are if you have 2 non players on the same line as the 2 emergencies both come on so long as you have nominated them as emergencies but if only one non player then lowest will count. That is basically the rules anyway. If both are in best 18 scores will count as well.
Thanks Ringo
I actually have a full fwd line and currently have Aarts as emergency with Close not selected at F8.
I wasn’t actually sure how it worked because it does say Best 18 including any emergencies selected.
Walters v J Martin.
Can’t believe I’m asking, but Walters back from injury and Jack I think is a serious chance to tear it up as Blues chase finals in their run home
Actually, as a package:
Lloyd/J Martin v L McDonald/Walters
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 29, 2020, 11:57:29 AM
Walters v J Martin.
Can’t believe I’m asking, but Walters back from injury and Jack I think is a serious chance to tear it up as Blues chase finals in their run home
Actually, as a package:
Lloyd/J Martin v L McDonald/Walters
Match up close, I like Mcdonald as a pod (although rd 15 bye).
Quote from: Samsturmfels on August 29, 2020, 01:00:48 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 29, 2020, 11:57:29 AM
Walters v J Martin.
Can’t believe I’m asking, but Walters back from injury and Jack I think is a serious chance to tear it up as Blues chase finals in their run home
Actually, as a package:
Lloyd/J Martin v L McDonald/Walters
Match up close, I like Mcdonald as a pod (although rd 15 bye).
Yeah, although I’m only playing for league and that isn’t a finals week.
Another option is Ryan and Walters
Miller or Walters please guys,
or anyone better around that price?
Thanks in advance
Quote from: Dmoney$ on August 29, 2020, 01:06:35 PM
Miller or Walters please guys,
or anyone better around that price?
Thanks in advance
Sam Walsh or Angus Brayshaw
Quote from: HoleMeal on August 29, 2020, 02:06:36 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on August 29, 2020, 01:06:35 PM
Miller or Walters please guys,
or anyone better around that price?
Thanks in advance
Sam Walsh or Angus Brayshaw
Walsh, better average and fixture.
Lukosius or Simpkin
Mitchell vs Merrett vs Zorko?
Quote from: Rusty00 on August 31, 2020, 10:24:33 AM
Mitchell vs Merrett vs Zorko?
I would go Mitchell.
I was considering Merrett this week, but I am now leaning towards Gaff
4 trades left
zwilliams/simpkin v lloyd/riccardi
next week - considering Neale to Gawn
Option 1 as don’t know when a Riccardi will get rested
Quote from: crowls on August 31, 2020, 07:58:42 PM
4 trades left
zwilliams/simpkin v lloyd/riccardi
next week - considering Neale to Gawn
Merrett vs Lyons.
Looking to maximise points this week, so not too fussed about Lyons' coming price drop.
Quote from: whynot102 on August 31, 2020, 08:27:17 PM
Option 1 as don’t know when a Riccardi will get restedQuote from: crowls on August 31, 2020, 07:58:42 PM
4 trades left
zwilliams/simpkin v lloyd/riccardi
next week - considering Neale to Gawn
thanks Whynot
figuring potential 30+ additional points and 100K in the bank makes it worthwhile. No leagues I need to win (ie cash) but always want to max overall. two bad captains in the past two weeks has cost me 800+ places in overall now 1790 and was hoping to get to <1K. hopefully the seagull can carry the additional burden
Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on September 01, 2020, 01:24:14 PM
Merrett vs Lyons.
Looking to maximise points this week, so not too fussed about Lyons' coming price drop.
I reckon I'd go Lyons - only in 2% of teams and a good run home
Greene vs A Brayshaw [Freo]
Think Greene could go nuts vs Crows, whereas Freo up against the Demons chasing finals?
Grundy or Nic Nat to pair with Gawn.
Nic Nat to face StK & North
Grundy to face GC & Port
The other 3 teams left in my league all have Gawn & Grundy.
Quote from: Woppa15 on September 10, 2020, 12:22:10 PM
Grundy or Nic Nat to pair with Gawn.
Nic Nat to face StK & North
Grundy to face GC & Port
The other 3 teams left in my league all have Gawn & Grundy.
To answer my own question, ceilings seem similar, Nic Nat i would suspect would probably be the more likely Of the two to have a 60 or 70 than Grundy.
Quote from: Woppa15 on September 10, 2020, 03:43:15 PM
Quote from: Woppa15 on September 10, 2020, 12:22:10 PM
Grundy or Nic Nat to pair with Gawn.
Nic Nat to face StK & North
Grundy to face GC & Port
The other 3 teams left in my league all have Gawn & Grundy.
To answer my own question, ceilings seem similar, Nic Nat i would suspect would probably be the more likely Of the two to have a 60 or 70 than Grundy.
NicNat riskier choice
Only have 450k to spend on a forward.
Dixon - Essendon / Collingwood
VS
Walters - North / Doggies
Lyons v Adams v Fyfe v Petrecca v Brayshaw
coniglio v Mcgluggage v T.Miller
Quote from: Wanderer on September 10, 2020, 06:47:35 PM
Only have 450k to spend on a forward.
Dixon - Essendon / Collingwood
VS
Walters - North / Doggies
Tough one, but I'd go Dixon - should go big this week, Walters seems to have lost his midfield minutes.
Quote from: tommy10 on September 10, 2020, 08:20:07 PM
Lyons v Adams v Fyfe v Petrecca v Brayshaw
I like Lyons or Adams out of these options for the POD, go Lyons.
Quote from: dahlhaus06 on September 11, 2020, 12:16:08 AM
coniglio v Mcgluggage v T.Miller
McCluggage is building nicely at the right time of the year, I'd go him (both great choices though)
Walters vs Bailey Smith
Quote from: dahlhaus06 on September 11, 2020, 12:16:08 AM
coniglio v Mcgluggage v T.Miller
McCluggage has the highest ceiling. Touk sometimes gets a shutdown role. Conigs is omitted.
Acres and Greenwood
vs
Viney or Houston and Dixon
Walters (M8) & Dev Smith
vs
Neale & Riccardi (F6)
Quote from: Wanderer on September 11, 2020, 02:25:28 PM
Acres and Greenwood
vs
Viney or Houston and Dixon
Acres and Greenwood for me
Quote from: Hazza09 on September 11, 2020, 02:43:22 PM
Walters (M8) & Dev Smith
vs
Neale & Riccardi (F6)
This is a tough one, but would say Neale having the potential to go 150+ means him and Riccardi
Quote from: Wanderer on September 10, 2020, 06:47:35 PM
Only have 450k to spend on a forward.
Dixon - Essendon / Collingwood
VS
Walters - North / Doggies
Not Walters - without mid time he is more chance of 60-80 score. Look at Acres or Greenwood or even Ladhams
If Docherty missed this week, I would be back in the game. ::)
Conig replacement: MCrouch v Boak vNeale v Walsh. (League only)
Robbie Grey/Kade Simpson vs Dixon/Caleb Daniel
Best forward for 532k? Thinking Martin v Gray v Ladhams
Ladhams, Brad Crouch, Sloane or Viney
Quote from: whynot102 on September 11, 2020, 11:43:04 PM
Ladhams, Brad Crouch, Sloane or Viney
Should go Dixon, but I would go Viney if had to choose out of those 4
Mcclugguge/Dawson Vs Lyons/Acres
A Brayshaw v Greenwood? Leaning towards Brayshaw v North
Quote from: B. on September 12, 2020, 10:31:39 AM
A Brayshaw v Greenwood? Leaning towards Brayshaw v North
Brayshaw just
ROB & Boak
vs
Goldy & Neale
Thinking purely for league win this week
Mcgluggage/Dawson vs Greenwood/Simpkin
Quote from: Maca24 on September 12, 2020, 10:33:33 AM
Quote from: B. on September 12, 2020, 10:31:39 AM
A Brayshaw v Greenwood? Leaning towards Brayshaw v North
Brayshaw just
ROB & Boak
vs
Goldy & Neale
Thinking purely for league win this week
Surely Goldy & Neale
Quote from: zac-ster on September 12, 2020, 11:27:10 AM
Mcgluggage/Dawson vs Greenwood/Simpkin
McCluggage/Dawson
Simpkin feels a bit risky after getting hit in the last game.
Dunkley/McCluggage/Greenwood
Quote from: Wanderer on September 12, 2020, 02:14:38 PM
Dunkley/McCluggage/Greenwood
Dunkley for ceiling provided your not littered with Bulldogs
Greenwood if you just not to bank on 90+
Jack Payne v Damon Greaves [potential cover for Docherty if he is out]
Grey v Brayshaw v Dixon [who scores more this week]
Quote from: BLBBLB on September 11, 2020, 06:16:08 PM
Conig replacement: MCrouch v Boak vNeale v Walsh. (League only)
Bump
B Crouch, Ladhams, Viney or Acres for Cogs replacement
Quote from: BLBBLB on September 12, 2020, 02:53:58 PM
Quote from: BLBBLB on September 11, 2020, 06:16:08 PM
Conig replacement: MCrouch v Boak vNeale v Walsh. (League only)
Bump
Boak surely tears the bombers a new anus?
McCluggage/Dawson Vs Viney/Greenwood?
Sholl vs Greaves
Didn’t watch the Crows game on the weekend but can anyone explain why Sholl scored so well?
Increased time in the midfield? Different role?
Quote from: Hazza09 on September 15, 2020, 10:21:34 PM
Sholl vs Greaves
Didn’t watch the Crows game on the weekend but can anyone explain why Sholl scored so well?
Increased time in the midfield? Different role?
Largely because Carlton were so shocking. I wouldn't be backing in a similar result against Richmond, and would probably lean towards Greaves.
Any premium mid other than Bont. Also not keen on Steele vs a potential De Boer tag.
Dangerfield vs Boak vs J.Kelly?
Liam Ryan Vs Acres Vs Simpson for 1 last hurrah to replace Docherty?
Quote from: Ingram on September 17, 2020, 05:32:10 PM
Liam Ryan Vs Acres Vs Simpson for 1 last hurrah to replace Docherty?
Gotta be Simmo!
I do love the idea but I'm in a position to bring in any def mid or fwd from DPP.
DBJ and Greene vs ZWilliams amd Sheed?