Has shown a bit through the NAB and with the severe drought in Rookie defenders this year could very well be a viable option.
My concern however is for those who already have Mitchell and Suckers can we afford to have a third Hawk in defence? Certainly not come bye time! I know it's only speculation but what are the chances he will not get enough games to increase in value enough to be a successful downgrade......
If you can't get him out before the byes we'd be in all sorts of strife
LOCKED AT D8.
Quote from: hellsg8 on February 22, 2014, 11:48:02 AM
LOCKED AT D8.
For me too, particularly if Cutler or any other rookies don't materialise. Loved his game against the Kangas, looks a player.
I've put him in now. KK made way for him. Should get bamed played 2 great NAB games
It's what everyone has been hoping a cheap defender lets hope he gets named round 1 , he could end up the most picked player in SC if he is
Quote from: shaker on February 22, 2014, 12:21:13 PM
It's what everyone has been hoping a cheap defender lets hope he gets named round 1 , he could end up the most picked player in SC if he is
I may even pick him if not named, he seems the most likely to see senior action out of all the rookies (McDonald aside).
He is in my team if named R1
looking like a good choice, still it comes down to Rnd 1
He will be strongly considered if named Round 1. For those worried about the byes bear in mind Hawks have Round 9 bye so he may be able to be upgraded to those with Round 8 byes.
Won't play guys.
Maybe a downgrade option if they get injuries later in the season.
Cant see how he gets a go in the Hawks line up.