FanFooty Forum

FanFooty => Supercoach Archive => Archives => 2014 Rate My SC Archive => Topic started by: Coxy10 on November 21, 2013, 12:15:25 PM

Title: Risky in defence but stronger in mids?
Post by: Coxy10 on November 21, 2013, 12:15:25 PM
B: P. Hanley, K. Simpson, G. Birchall, M. Suckling, M. Scharenberg, L. McDonald (J. Bews, D. Van Unen)

M: S. Pendlebury, J. Selwood, J. Watson, T. Cotchin, M. Murphy, D. Beams, D. Tyson, C. Beams (J. Martin, M. Crouch)

R: M. Kreuzer, A. Sandilands (D. Currie, L. McBean)

F: T. Rockliff, D. Martin, N. Naitanui, D. Thomas, P. Karnezis, V. Michie (J. Hogan, S. Kersten)

Salary Remaining: $22,300
Bye Structure: 11/7/10
Title: Re: Risky in defence but stronger in mids?
Post by: Ricochet on November 21, 2013, 01:27:01 PM
Love this mate. You've got a really good balance of risk and rock solid premos. Don't think your backline is too risky at all.
Only concern would be no Ablett but your mids are still super strong.
Title: Re: Risky in defence but stronger in mids?
Post by: Holz on November 21, 2013, 01:35:21 PM
The issue will be when rocky and nic Nat both lose their forward status. Hanley might lose defence.

The defence is pretty reasonable.
Title: Re: Risky in defence but stronger in mids?
Post by: GoLions on November 25, 2013, 06:31:23 PM
Really like your backline
Mids look really good
Ruck looks good
Forwards good

Wouldn't change it as long as it is affordable

Quote from: Holzman on November 21, 2013, 01:35:21 PM
The issue will be when rocky and nic Nat both lose their forward status. Hanley might lose defence.

The defence is pretty reasonable.
I really want Rockliff to lose DPP, as I have him locked in either way and would become a great POD. Honestly think he might keep it though.