Have started separate thread for National Draft.
Please note that to take all picks in the National Draft you should have delisted sufficient players from your Senior List of 41 players to take picks eg if you have 5 picks you should have delisted 5 players either retired or delisted. If you have insufficient picks you will be passed in the draft.
Rule 3.3 Each team will be allocated 4 picks which may be used in the draft, or traded on to other teams. With the de-listings we have 6 rounds will be conducted followed by supplementary round if required.
Draft order will be kept up to date during trade period with final update prior to National Draft.
Available players will be listed as well.
NATIONAL DRAFT PICKS
Round 1
1. Lobsters - Jack Billings
2. Swaggers - James Aish
3. Magic - Matt Scharenburg
4. Giants - Thomas Boyd
5. Leeches Bombers Owls Kade Kolodjashnij!
6. Steins - Josh Kelly
7. OwlsBombers - Dom Sheed
8. Bunnies - Matt Crouch
9. Cruisers Owls Lobsters - Luke Dunstan
10. Falcons - Marcus Bontempelli
11. Hawks Lobsters Owls Breakers - Ben Lennon
12. Hurricanes - Trent Dumont
13. Hoods Hurricanes Bombers Magic - Luke McDonald
14. Badgers Bunnies - Nathan Freeman
15. Breakers - Blake Acres
16. Bombers Werewolves - Patrick Cripps
17. Hedgehogs - Dayle Garlett
18. Werewolves Bombers Leeches - Christian Salem
Round 2
19. Lobsters - Lewis Taylor
20. Swaggers - Zac Merrett
21. Magic Badgers - Matt Fuller
22. Giants - Will Hartung
23. Leeches Bombers Swaggers - Zak Jones
24. Steins - Nathan Gordon
25. Owls Bombers Riley Knight
26. Bunnies Bombers Werewolves - Toby Nankervis
27. Cruisers - Jarman Impey
28. Falcons - Darcy Lang
29. Hawks Lobsters Badgers Owls Badgers Steins Malcolm Karpany
30. Hurricanes Owls Bunnies - Cameron McCarthy
31. Hoods Werewolves - Mitch Honeychurch
32. Badgers Owls Breakers Darcy Gardner
33. Breakers - Jarrad Jansen
34. Bombers Werewolves Cameron Giles
35, Hedgehogs Breakers - Jake Kolodjashnij
36. Werewolves James Sicily
Round 3
37. Lobsters Swaggers Jonathan Marsh
38. Swaggers Jay Kennedy-Harris
39. Magic - Michael Apeness
40. Giants - Daniel McStay
41. Leeches - Nick Robertson
42. Steins Badgers - Jack Leslie,
43. Owls Hoods Bunnies - Rory Lobb
44. Bunnies Badgers Owls Lobsters - Ben Brown
45. Cruisers - Jake Barrett
46. Falcons Cruisers Hedgehogs - Nick Holman
47. Hawks Bombers Owls - Sam Lloyd
48. Hurricanes - Tom Cutler.
49. Hoods Werewolves Bombers Lobsters Falcons - Sean Lemmens
50. Badgers Bombers - Mitch Harvey
51. Breakers - Jonathan Freeman
52. Bombers - Orazio Fantasia
53. Hedgehogs - Dylan Main
54. Werewolves Bombers Aliir Aliir
Round 4
55. Lobsters Badgers Magic red]Pass[/color]
56. Swaggers Bombers - Darcy Byrne-Jones
57. Magic - Pass
58. Giants - George Hewett
59. Leeches Pass
60. Steins Pass
61. Owls Badgers - Jayden Hunt
62. Bunnies Hoods - Tom Langdon
63. Cruisers - Tom Barrass
64. Falcons - Alex Pearce
65. Hawks - Brady Grey
66. Hurricanes Hoods - Karl Amon
67. Hoods Werewolves Bombers Swaggers Rookie elevation Will Langford
68. Badgers
69. Breakers Owls
70. Bombers Werewolves elevate Tom Hickey to the senior list
71. Hedgehogs
72. Werewolves Bombers Badgers
Round 5
73. Lobsters Matt Arnott elevated
74. Swaggers
75. Magic
76. Giants Pass
77. Leeches Pass
78. Steins Pass
79. Owls
80. Bunnies Elevate Zac Williams onto the Senior List
81. Cruisers Hawks
82. Falcons
83. Hawks
84. Hurricanes Badgers
85. Hoods
86. Badgers Pass
87. Breakers Hedgehogs
88. Bombers Werewolves Pass
89. Hedgehogs
90. Werewolves Pass
Round 6
91. Lobsters Hayden Crozier elevated
92. Swaggers Hurricanes
93. Magic
94. Giants Pass
95. Leeches Pass
96. Steins Brandon Jack elevated to Senior List
97. Owls
98. Bunnies Hawks
99. Cruisers Pass
100. Falcons
101. Hawks
102. Hurricanes
103. Hoods Kyle Hartigan elevated from Rookie list
104. Badgers Pass
105. Breakers
106. Bombers Werewolves Pass
107. Hedgehogs Josh Bruce elevtaed from Rookie List
108. Werewolves Pass
National Draft PLayers Players in Red have been picked and are not available
1. GWS Tom Boyd
2. GWS Josh Kelly
3. St Kilda Jack Billings
4. Western Bulldogs Marcus Bontempelli
5. Gold Coast Kade Kolodjashnij
6. Collingwood Matt Scharenburg
7. Brisbane Lions James Aish
8. North Melbourne Luke McDonald
9. Melbourne Christian Salem
10. Collingwood Nathan Freeman
11. West Coast Dom Sheed
12. Richmond Ben Lennon
13. Carlton Patrick Cripps
14. GWS Cameron McCarthy
15. Sydney Swans Zak Jones
16. Geelong Darcy Lang
17. Fremantle Michael Apeness
18. St Kilda Luke Dunstan
19. St Kilda Blake Acres
20. Gold Coast Jack Lesle
ROUND TWO
21. Port Adelaide Jarman Impey
22. Brisbane Lions Darcy Gardner
23. Adelaide Matt Crouch
24. Hawthorn Will Hartung
25. Brisbane Lions Daniel McStay
26. Essendon Zac Merrett
27. Gold Coast Sean Lemmens
28. Brisbane Lions Lewis Taylor
29. GWS Rory Lobb
30. North Melbourne Trent Dumont
31. West Coast Malcolm Karpany
32. Sydney Swans George Hewett
33. Brisbane Lions Tom Cutler
34. Brisbane Lions Nick Robertson
35. Sydney Swans Toby Nankervis
36. Geelong Jarrad Jansen
37. Fremantle Alex Pearce
38. Hawthorn Dayle Garlett
ROUND THREE
39. Carlton Cameron Giles
40. Melbourne Jay Kennedy-Harris
41. Geelong Jake Kolodjashnij
42. Western Bulldogs Matt Fuller
43. West Coast Tom Barrass
44. Sydney Swans Aliir Aliir
45. Port Adelaide Mitch Harvey
46. Adelaide Riley Knight
47. North Melbourne Ben Brown
49. West Coast Dylan Main
50. Richmond Nathan Gordon
51. Carlton Nick Holman
52. Port Adelaide Darcy Byrne-Jones
55. Essendon Orazio Fantasia
56. Hawthorn James Sicily
ROUND FOUR
57. Melbourne Jayden Hunt
58. Fremantle Brady Grey
60. Western Bulldogs Mitch Honeychurch
62. Brisbane Lions Jonathan Freeman
65. Collingwood Tom Langdon
66. Richmond Sam Lloyd
68. Port Adelaide Karl Amon
ROUND FIVE
77. Collingwood Jonathan Marsh
ROUND SIX
ROUND SEVEN
97. GWS Jake Barrett
The Hoods elevate Kyle Hartigan from the rookie list to the senior list with pick 103
oh we can name our rookie promotions now?
Quote from: whatlez on October 19, 2013, 10:43:15 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 19, 2013, 10:41:52 AM
oh we can name our rookie promotions now?
I doubt it
That's what i was told by Ringo
Lezo likes to argue about everything
Cause saying I doubt it is arguing. ::)
Quote from: vinny on October 19, 2013, 10:54:47 AM
Cause saying I doubt it is arguing. ::)
Stop arguing ;)
Football factory PM'd me about nominating draft picks for promotion and I said that he could nominate in the draft thread which he did. Unfortunately I have not yet had the time to announce in thread.
So you can nominate in thread which picks you will use for rookie promotions to your Senior List.
Remember though you must have a vacancy to promote when pick is to be taken. That is no more than 41 can be on your Senior list.
I will update the draft with nominated promotions as well.
i currently have 30 players on my senior list
and have 8 picks in the first 4 rounds will bring the senior list to 38 but none listed after that
so i take it that means i'll get 3 picks in the "Subsidiary picks to bring lists to 41"
i want to use two of these to promote Sutcliffe and Michie but i guess i cant nominate yet as the order is unknown until they are required ?
Once all delistings are complete by 21st November I will then advise order of supplementary draft list so you can then nominate which picks you are using to promote them.
I'm currently using Pick 91 to elevate Matt Arnot, but I need another two ND picks to fill my senior list. I'd like to use the last of those two to elevate him instead and use 91 to pick whoever.
My rookie players at the moment suck so I don't really need to elevate anyone lol.
So can I draft someone and then put them on the rookie list?
Rules do not allow it that way Lez - But you can de-list rookies to pick up additional rookies in the rookie psd /draft.
Ringo just to nominate my rookie promotion and confirm my draft situation:
Current Senior List : 38 players (-3 from full list of 41)
Delisting: 2 (-5 from full list of 41)
Promoting: Tom Hickey with National Draft Pick #70 ( -4 from full list of 41)
This makes 4 national draft picks available to me : 16, 31, 34, 36
This makes 1 rookie draft pick available to me: 18.
All correct?
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 19, 2013, 08:30:38 PM
Ringo just to nominate my rookie promotion and confirm my draft situation:
Current Senior List : 38 players (-3 from full list of 41)
Delisting: 2 (-5 from full list of 41)
Promoting: Tom Hickey with National Draft Pick #70 ( -4 from full list of 41)
This makes 4 national draft picks available to me : 16, 31, 34, 36
This makes 1 rookie draft pick available to me: 18.
All correct?
Hickey was traded in? But why is he on rook list?
i think he has to be on my rookie list because the player i traded out for him was on my rookie list
Colli you are correct and that is the way I read the rules atm although the rules for trading a rookie for a player are not specific. Will need to amend prior to next year and sort this issue out.
Just realised Ringo, Owls are meant to have Pick 7 and Lobsters Pick 9 as the trade says. You accidentally put it the other way around.
Nice work Ringo.
I believe it is 5 NAT picks for the Owls not 6 :)
looking at it as of now there will be a LOT of teams skipping a LOT of picks :)
as for the bombers and the lobsters do they even have enough picks .....
12 for the bombers OMG ! here they going to get 12 from ?
Quote from: vinny on October 20, 2013, 10:09:35 PM
Nice work Ringo.
I believe it is 5 NAT picks for the Owls not 6 :)
Thanks Vinny you are correct as you have 36 on list.
Jesus, I didnt even think about teams skipping picks! Yay! :D
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 20, 2013, 10:10:30 PM
looking at it as of now there will be a LOT of teams skipping a LOT of picks :)
as for the bombers and the lobsters do they even have enough picks .....
12 for the bombers OMG ! here they going to get 12 from ?
One of the reasons I decided to post to just give Teams an idea of where they currently stand. Yes some teams will skip and others have a significant number of trades. Still a couple of weeks trading left to change as well.
Quote from: Ringo on October 20, 2013, 10:18:52 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 20, 2013, 10:10:30 PM
looking at it as of now there will be a LOT of teams skipping a LOT of picks :)
as for the bombers and the lobsters do they even have enough picks .....
12 for the bombers OMG ! here they going to get 12 from ?
One of the reasons I decided to post to just give Teams an idea of where they currently stand. Yes some teams will skip and others have a significant number of trades. Still a couple of weeks trading left to change as well.
yes much will change once all delistings announced - great work as always Ringo.
Powerbug has McGlynn, not me
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 20, 2013, 10:10:30 PM
looking at it as of now there will be a LOT of teams skipping a LOT of picks :)
as for the bombers and the lobsters do they even have enough picks .....
12 for the bombers OMG ! here they going to get 12 from ?
FYI Ringo, Magic now have Pick 13 we traded it for Hall
FYI Colli, Bombers have 31 players on senior list and we have 6 picks in the first 3 rounds and 1 in the 4th round brings list to 38 players then we get "Subsidiary picks to bring lists to 41" after the 6 rounds 2 of which i'll be using to upgrade Michie and Sutcliffe to the senior list so i can use pick 14 & 16 in the rookie draft
and what are the benefits for pick skipping?
teams with lists they do not want to delist players on will have to SKIP their picks in the national draft.
no benefit to the team that skips, benefit is to the other teams wanting to draft.
i have to take 5 nat draft picks but i have 10 available so i will pick 5 players upgrade a rook and skip my last 4 picks.
several clubs will be in this situation which for teams like you who will draft deep it is good for.
i wish i knew 2 of my rooks were going to be delisted before i traded all my picks for better nat picks, i could use a rook pick better than 54 now since i will need to use all 3 of my rook picks.
oh ok cool hopefully us next year will; be skipping picks :P
Will use pick 72 to upgrade Matt Arnot and 91 to upgrade Hayden Crozier. I believe that leaves me 1, 9, 19, 44 and 49, and then gives me a senior list of 39 meaning I need two more ND picks (in the supplementary round or whatever?). I understand this will also give m e three rookie picks.
Also, I traded Alex Browne to kb/Birmingham for Pick 49.
yeah Mitch Clisby and Alex Browne are missing from my list
1 Dyson Heppell
2 Todd Goldstein
3 Harley Bennell
4 Travis Cloke
5 Bachar Houli
6 Adam Treloar
7 (ND Pick #1)
8 Brent Harvey
9 Brent Reilly
10 Scott D. Thompson
11 Michael Walters
12 Brett Goodes
13 Travis Varcoe
14 Lewis Johnston
15 Sam Wright
16 Michael Firrito
17 (ND Pick #9)
18 James Polkinghorne
19 Dennis Armfield
20 Kieran Harper
21 (ND Pick #19)
22 Jake Spencer
23 (ND Pick #44)
24 (ND Pick #49)
25 (Hayden Crozier by way of an upgrade using ND Pick #73)
26 Levi Casboult
27 (Matt Arnot by way of an upgrade using ND Pick #91)
28 Matt Dea
29 Jacob Townsend
30 Tom Curren
31 Matt Thomas
32 TBA
33 TBA
34 Luke Delaney
35 Mitch Hallahan
36 Nathan Brown
37 Nick Duigan
38 TBA
39 Nathan Hrovat
40 Josh Saunders
41 Rory Atkins
42 Dylan Van Unen (R)
43 TBA (R)
44 TBA (R)
45 TBA (R)
This is how my list should be once all the set rounds of the National Draft are complete. Looks like I'll need 3 supplementary picks and 3 rookie picks, unless I've missed something. Please confirm this Ringo. :)
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 21, 2013, 08:35:31 AM
yeah Mitch Clisby and Alex Browne are missing from my list
Thanks KB missed Clisby amongst all the pick changes and Browne was missed all together sorry.
Quote from: NigeyS on October 21, 2013, 09:41:08 AM
1 Dyson Heppell
2 Todd Goldstein
3 Harley Bennell
4 Travis Cloke
5 Bachar Houli
6 Adam Treloar
7 (ND Pick #1)
8 Brent Harvey
9 Brent Reilly
10 Scott D. Thompson
11 Michael Walters
12 Brett Goodes
13 Travis Varcoe
14 Lewis Johnston
15 Sam Wright
16 Michael Firrito
17 (ND Pick #9)
18 James Polkinghorne
19 Dennis Armfield
20 Kieran Harper
21 (ND Pick #19)
22 Jake Spencer
23 (ND Pick #44)
24 (ND Pick #49)
25 (Hayden Crozier by way of an upgrade using ND Pick #73)
26 Levi Casboult
27 (Matt Arnot by way of an upgrade using ND Pick #91)
28 Matt Dea
29 Jacob Townsend
30 Tom Curren
31 Matt Thomas
32 TBA
33 TBA
34 Luke Delaney
35 Mitch Hallahan
36 Nathan Brown
37 Nick Duigan
38 TBA
39 Nathan Hrovat
40 Josh Saunders
41 Rory Atkins
42 Dylan Van Unen (R)
43 TBA (R)
44 TBA (R)
45 TBA (R)
This is how my list should be once all the set rounds of the National Draft are complete. Looks like I'll need 3 supplementary picks and 3 rookie picks, unless I've missed something. Please confirm this Ringo. :)
Numbers add up to me know can you just check the names with new list I have updated - missed the Alex Browne trade
Yep, think my list is good to go.
Only thing about my list im not sure about is .. I have used pick 103Nat to elevate Hartigan to senior list. So i think all i need is 2 Nat Draft picks ..and 2 rookie picks, one of which is a nat draft pick (62) except trading rules states it is a rookie pick.
So to bring my list up to date i will need to use
Pick 62 Nat(Rook), Pick 66 Nat, Pick 85 Nat
and
Pick 31 Rook
Have not factored promotions into the lists at this stage so bear that in mind. You can work out own promotions and picks just listing how many picks of each you have to assist you finalising de-listing
Hi mate draft not updated since Tyson trade
Bombers have Pick 5 and Pick 23
Leeches have pick 18
#pick29
hey mate
just noticed the list says Badgers have pick 54 but pretty sure the Bombers should still have it
Just a glitch with pasting - must have accidentally pasted twice now fixed. Thank You.
btw should i do what i did last year and have a list in another thread of players i cross off as they get drafted ?
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 28, 2013, 06:30:58 AM
hey mate
just noticed the list says Badgers have pick 54 but pretty sure the Bombers should still have it
That's good. One less pick I don't want.
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on October 28, 2013, 08:58:47 AM
btw should i do what i did last year and have a list in another thread of players i cross off as they get drafted ?
You can do that if you wish as a double check but I propose to keep the front page updated. You can see that I have a list of delisted players already. (That is players delisted by British Clubs but there will be alot more in due course).
One week :)
yeah we might have a problem with list sizes all 18 AFL clubs have a combined just over 60 picks they can use in the NAT Draft
Pretty sure heaps of teams are passing most of their picks and stuff so I am hoping we are fine. :)
Quote from: vinny on November 19, 2013, 10:26:02 PM
Pretty sure heaps of teams are passing most of their picks and stuff so I am hoping we are fine. :)
you mean BXV Teams passing picks?
there are rookie elevations to take into consideration also which use some nat picks.
going to be close in BXVS with the 18 teams....
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 19, 2013, 10:27:38 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 19, 2013, 10:26:02 PM
Pretty sure heaps of teams are passing most of their picks and stuff so I am hoping we are fine. :)
you mean BXV Teams passing picks?
Yeah cause some teams delisted less than others.
But there has been like 75 odd delisting, not sure how many of those have been filled by trading of picks and stuff.
will be tight!
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 19, 2013, 10:28:49 PM
there are rookie elevations to take into consideration also which use some nat picks.
going to be close in BXVS with the 18 teams....
lol yeah i have 6 NAT Picks #56 or earlier so should be fine with them but then have another 4 picks after the 6 rounds to make list 41 but using 2 of those for promotions
then have to draft 4 rookies also but have rookie 7, 14, 16 and 52
i might be ok few guys on the no team list now can be re drafted if needed also, Glass etc
Will wait and see how many National Draft players are taken. If the rumoured number of no more than 50 is correct then we may have to look at some change of rules.
Going to foresee this possible change for this year only in that if all team lists can not be filled from the National Draft then we take from the preseason draft following allocation of all drafted players. Still toying with the idea to allow nomination of Rookies for this year only as well but as I say will wait and see till after tomorrows draft
"allow nomination of Rookies" ?
i literally don't understand the idea behind this? not arguing just don't understand
Another I am considering is not starting the drafy till after the Rookie Draft as well so we have only one draft and then nominate our rookies. May send out a vote on this.
Quote from: Ringo on November 20, 2013, 10:42:17 AM
Another I am considering is not starting the drafy till after the Rookie Draft as well so we have only one draft and then nominate our rookies. May send out a vote on this.
nooo not more waiting lol
simplest way imo we draft as many players as we can after the NAT Draft to fill senior lists
then if needed the rookie draft is also used to fill the senior list if a few teams don't have a rookie list for a season doubt it matters or they even care
So are AFL clubs going to have less than 45 listed players next year? Since they are not drafting as many?
I thought all clubs (bar the two newies) had the same amount of players and our BXV's squads also replicated that number....
Quote from: PowerBug on November 20, 2013, 04:33:37 PM
So are AFL clubs going to have less than 45 listed players next year? Since they are not drafting as many?
I thought all clubs (bar the two newies) had the same amount of players and our BXV's squads also replicated that number....
All clubs (except for the newbies) must have between 38-40 people on its senior list, then 4 rookies. They are also allowed a couple other rookie spots for international or alternative talent players.
Quote from: Ringo on November 20, 2013, 10:42:17 AM
Another I am considering is not starting the drafy till after the Rookie Draft as well so we have only one draft and then nominate our rookies. May send out a vote on this.
No way we need more then one draft i traded away my nat picks but kept my rookie picks so i could hopefullly snag a mature aged rookie with my first round pick. Cant change drafting rules after we have traded draft picks based on a set value
Quote from: CrowsFan on November 20, 2013, 05:13:47 PM
Quote from: PowerBug on November 20, 2013, 04:33:37 PM
So are AFL clubs going to have less than 45 listed players next year? Since they are not drafting as many?
I thought all clubs (bar the two newies) had the same amount of players and our BXV's squads also replicated that number....
All clubs (except for the newbies) must have between 38-40 people on its senior list, then 4 rookies. They are also allowed a couple other rookie spots for international or alternative talent players.
Fari enough then. By that statement I say we should only have 40 senior spots then, not 41. :| Then again, I have no idea how any of this stuff works. :P
If teams can't fill their entire senior list then they got compensation picks at the end of the rookie draft. Those players go straight onto the senior list but only after you fill up your rookie list.
OK Thanks for the feedback on the issue all - It is going to be difficult to get full complement.
This is how it will work
Coaches will draft all players from the National Draft as per draft pick lists.
Coaches will then exhuast their Rookie picks. Will be a maximum of three as per rules.
Should you not have 45 players then picks will be allocated for you to pick from players not yet taken in the rookie draft.
Wait so can I have no rookies on my rookie list going into the rookie draft? I have 2 currently but want to promote both
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 20, 2013, 08:30:42 PM
Wait so can I have no rookies on my rookie list going into the rookie draft? I have 2 currently but want to promote both
You will have a supplementary pick to take to 4 rookies as well - it is just that the rules as they stand stipulate 3 rounds for rookie draft.
Oh ok cool but I think I'm ok cause I have 7, 14, 16 and 52 in the rookie draft
the players available list got taken off?
oh it's still in the rookie thread
feeling the pressure a bit now :-X
haha settle down mate, I'm 99% sure your man will be there. not trying to jinx, haha. :P
Quote from: vinny on November 21, 2013, 08:58:18 PM
haha settle down mate, I'm 99% sure your man will be there. not trying to jinx, haha. :P
think plans have changed :o
#dumdumduuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum!!!
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 21, 2013, 08:59:13 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 21, 2013, 08:58:18 PM
haha settle down mate, I'm 99% sure your man will be there. not trying to jinx, haha. :P
think plans have changed :o
Oooo :P
We have a total of 62 players to choose from in the National Draft . List is now on front page and draft will start when Nigey selects his first pick. Please PM next Coach on the list.
Not all picks will therfore be taken so there will be a supplementary draft pick following the completion of Rookie Draft.
Yay! Haha, I am pumped.
As I said somewhere else, my profile may say I am online but most of the time I am not actually there so not sure how that 2 hour rule will apply because my phone is just on FF as is my Ipad at times which is just always on. But I will always try to pick ASAP :)
Get rowddyyyyyy!!
Discussed this with my peeps beforehand. Gonna maybe surprise a few... Maybe not. The first pick of the 2013 BXV Nat Draft is Jack Billings[\b].
Not that surprising really
I messaged Jukes
Very good pick Nige.
Billings is who I wanted. >:(
Nice, I was able to get him @ pick 6 in AXV, #StealOfTheCentury
Quote from: NigeyS on November 22, 2013, 08:18:12 AM
Discussed this with my peeps beforehand. Gonna maybe surprise a few... Maybe not. The first pick of the 2013 BXV Nat Draft is Jack Billings.
Basically, he was taken at #3 by the Saints who are blooding youth, he will get games and is a possibility of F/M. Has the potential to do nicely in fantasy and is definitely one of the lads I like the most in the pool.
James Aish
Quote from: Jukes on November 22, 2013, 11:48:03 AM
James Aish
damn, wanted to take him with #4
should have upgraded pick 4 to #1/#2
Aish and Billings were my top 2 preferences. flower this when you can't get your top 2 preferred with the 4th pick.
Is there a 2 hour online rule? ???
If so, Torp only has an hour left. I PM'd him after Jukes picked.
I don't think it's being enforced until after 8pm
Quote from: Nails on November 22, 2013, 12:22:08 PM
flower this when you can't get your top 2 preferred with the 4th pick.
:o
Do people want me to make a seperate players available list thread like last year?
Will be interesting to see how this draft matched the real draft - Already Top 2 still not picked.
2hour rule will be enforced at discretion of Administrator but more than likely will be strictly enforced after 8:00pm tonight which was to be the official start of draft.
Re: the 2 hour rule - Sounds fair, knowing Torp we could be waiting a while though.
so knew this was going to happen :'(
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 22, 2013, 02:25:05 PM
so knew this was going to happen :'(
Not gonna lie, so did I... Torp's not the greatest to draft with. :-\
#soztorp
Torp just posted in cricket...
Quote from: Nails on November 22, 2013, 03:39:30 PM
Torp just posted in cricket...
He's on chat.
Quote from: Torpedo10[15:34] Torp: ll pick very soon
translation - sometime today, lol
Matt Scharenberg
Sorry about the delay guys. Bilings would've been my auto-pick but he went and when Nigel PMed me earlier I had to leave. Sorry about this delay.
Then we wait for Nails
messaged Nails
Damn it Torp :( Good pick :(
Quote from: Nails on November 22, 2013, 03:39:30 PM
Torp just posted in cricket...
Just a tad critical champ. :P
Are players like Johnny Rayner, Daniel Flynn and Jason Holmes available in this draft?
pretty sure we can take any AFL listed player not on a BXV List
I think these players will be added to the rookie draft as International Rookies or Alternate Code Rookies or should we add to national Draft. I am easy either way but the fact they were called International Rookies lent me to Rookie draft. Welcome your comments.
Not fussed either way tbh.
The 2 hour rule would be nice though. :P
It isn't a big deal but I think NAT draft. If they aren't picked they go into rookie drsft.
Either way works for me
Thomas Boyd I guess..
Don't know much about the rookies, but I know this bloke is a gun to be and he's a forward which we need a gun one of
Fantasy Freako @FantasyFreako 4h
Only xxx, xxxx, xxxx and Tom Boyd avg. more #Supercoach points than @xxxxFC xxx in TAC Cup.
I know it's not supercoach, but supercoach punishes clangers as does BXVs. Therefore this bloke must be pretty solid for BXVs.
Can't go wrong with #1 pick at #4
We'll take Thomas Boyd.
Not meant to mention non drafted players...
I didn't, freako did ;)
Give me a little bit fellas, I just need to confirm a few things. Won't be long, I promise :)
The Oxford Owls would like to take Kade Kolodjashnij!
(http://i44.tinypic.com/4ffjb.jpg)
i regret telling you to pick him arleady :)
lets hope im proven wrong.
Hahaha I think either way we couldn't have went too bad, glad to get this bloke.
Cheers mate and not to forget Noz too! :)
I rate KK really really high, Very lucky we were able to get him 8)
Boyd... was he a good pick or a bad pick? Don't know much about him lol.
Though had a top notch SC average in young kiddies comp
Quote from: Nails on November 22, 2013, 06:46:59 PM
Boyd... was he a good pick or a bad pick? Don't know much about him lol.
Though had a top notch SC average in young kiddies comp
Good pick.
he was available for a reason though but still not a bad pick
Quote from: Nails on November 22, 2013, 06:46:59 PM
Boyd... was he a good pick or a bad pick? Don't know much about him lol.
Though had a top notch SC average in young kiddies comp
Only problem is sportal doesnt reward KPFs but he will still become a handy player.
Yeah he will be good eventually, but for a KPF he is extremely good on the ground too.
Quote from: Nails on November 22, 2013, 06:46:59 PM
Boyd... was he a good pick or a bad pick? Don't know much about him lol.
Though had a top notch SC average in young kiddies comp
Asain he is clealry the best player avilable, Worlds i think he is a great pick possibly 1.
British and DT, where you got him seems about right 3-6
come on tabs put me out of my misery cant handle it anymore
Yeah, I think forwards is what we need most
Mids we got good young players so we needed a solid forward or back option.
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 22, 2013, 07:11:20 PM
come on tabs put me out of my misery cant handle it anymore
Left chat earlier because of something to do with his internet...
yeah i'm just joking cause there is like 2 or 3 guys i want and it's killing me to decide
now i know how they feel on draft night
can we have more time please
Ringo - course
Nails didn't delist anyone?
edit: dw, just saw it. Just came in a little late. :P
I can finally join in on these chats.
I'm nervous and I'm only an assistant.
This is hectic stuff
Can someone PM Tabs please, sorry!
Quote from: vinny on November 22, 2013, 07:51:49 PM
Can someone PM Tabs please, sorry!
Yeah, he already has been.
if i'm on i'll always pm the next guy lol keeps it moving
so after you have picked if you have or are going to pm the next guy please say so when picking
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 22, 2013, 07:59:32 PM
if i'm on i'll always pm the next guy lol keeps it moving
And you're on a fair bit which helps. 8)
I'll message him on Facebook.
Calm down, its ok.
Im fine thanks for all the messages
Josh Kelly
Quote from: tabs on November 22, 2013, 09:28:20 PM
Josh Kelly
grrr it took you that long to pick the best kid in the draft :P
edit: and the guy i wanted! >:(
Looks like I should get my next pick tonight.
Now where's kb? :P
The Birmingham bombers would like to take Dominic Sheed.
nice >:(
Damn you Birmingham. >:(
1 down, 1 to go...
bring on the hate ;D
Bunnies take Matt Crouch.
Need to go, can someone please pm next?
Was gonna take Sheed but eh...
Not gonna complain about taking this lad.
I think he's gonna turn out to be well worth using Pick 9.
Come on down, Luke Dunstan! 8)
Have PM'd Spink of the Falcons.
Falcons select:
Marcus Bontempelli
Can't go too wrong with Pick 4 at Pick 10! Nice job Spink. 8)
Quote from: NigeyS on November 22, 2013, 10:01:18 PM
Can't go too wrong with Pick 4 at Pick 10! Nice job Spink. 8)
doesn't look that great for fantasy
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 22, 2013, 10:02:53 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on November 22, 2013, 10:01:18 PM
Can't go too wrong with Pick 4 at Pick 10! Nice job Spink. 8)
doesn't look that great for fantasy
He'll be good enough, but maybe won't reach the heights of some other guys being taken.
to be fair one of the better options left now though
Few guys that I am shocked have not been picked yet!
Feel free to say this is a shower pick on he guys who are still left, but we need forwards, so we'll take Ben Lennon 8)
Quote from: nrich102 on November 22, 2013, 10:18:48 PM
Feel free to say this is a shower pick on he guys who are still left, but we need forwards, so we'll take Ben Lennon 8)
BEATLE! ;D
Definitely not a shower pick. ;)
agree great choice. went at #12 in AXVS , one earlier here :)
yeah think he has great potential a few people would have picked him now i think
Nothing wrong with Lennon
Quote from: Dayze on November 22, 2013, 10:34:11 PM
Nothing wrong with Lennon
You should talk to Ringo I'm pretty sure you guys would become good friends.
^ quality Beatles referral there
i messaged powerbug
i am praying my guy slips to #16 but there is just no way it will happen, even tho he was drafted late, some scoundrel is going to nab him before me i just know it....
I know who it is Colli and I'm going to hate you for picking him.
Quote from: elephants on November 22, 2013, 11:15:34 PM
I know who it is Colli and I'm going to hate you for picking him.
you could never hate me :)
i am betting it is someone before both of us that you will be hating, can't possibly slip much further
it's quite fun waiting and seeing if who you want makes it to your pick we have a handful of guys on our shortlist for pick 25 one or two should realistically be there :P
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 22, 2013, 11:19:18 PM
Quote from: elephants on November 22, 2013, 11:15:34 PM
I know who it is Colli and I'm going to hate you for picking him.
you could never hate me :)
i am betting it is someone before both of us that you will be hating, can't possibly slip much further
Haha that is true 8) You'd think so but you never know! Lets go go go! I wanna pick haha
I have nfi what I'm doing with these drafts, so I'll just take a South Australian. Trent Dumont please. Seems to be an inside midfielder too so that'll help for this game, hopefully he'll be given chances to play early in the season for North. :)
Quote from: PowerBug on November 23, 2013, 10:14:03 AM
I have nfi what I'm doing with these drafts, so I'll just take a South Australian. Trent Dumont please. Seems to be an inside midfielder too so that'll help for this game, hopefully he'll be given chances to play early in the season for North. :)
I did read somewhere that whoever wrote the article reckons North will give Dumont every opportunity to establish a spot in the 22.
Really? Even better. This is why I traded away my draft picks, I hve not been following anything at all. :P The only player I sort of knew was Aish because I was friends with him at primary school. :P
Will be out till this afternoon so OP will not be updated till I return.
Quote from: Ringo on November 23, 2013, 11:05:25 AM
Will be out till this afternoon so OP will not be updated till I return.
what?.!!?
an admin with a life???? :o
The AXV draft is moving so fast! Come on fellas.
We'll probably be waiting that long for Torp anyway.
Quote from: vinny on November 23, 2013, 11:17:53 AM
The AXV draft is moving so fast! Come on fellas.
Torp isn't in Asians. :P
Hahaha I was actually thinking that as I typed!
You guys are mean :(
Luke McDonald
Quote from: Torpedo10 on November 23, 2013, 01:07:13 PM
You guys are mean :(
Luke McDonald
Dont give us reason to be then ;)
messaged SR on here and the AXVIII as he should get a email from there ;D
Torp has been pretty good so far give him a chance
as long as we don't have to wait like a whole day for someone think that's a reasonable expectation
AXV Draft has put us to shame though lol
Haha was kidding, we love Torp! :)
Cheers guys, TBH I have picked within 30 minutes of coming onto FF the last 2 picks. Just haven't been on when the person before me picks!
Wow you guys are nearly past the 1st round.
Well done.
I'm going to be out all day (lunch -> glory) so if it's my pick message my assistant Kellogscrunchynut and he'll take the pick.
Quote from: Noz on November 23, 2013, 02:12:11 PM
Wow you guys are nearly past the 1st round.
Well done.
I reckon this Ashes test is likely to finish before the second round of the draft at this rate...
amusing that i could have had picks 13, 16, 23 and 26
think i prefer having Hall, Clisby, Lamb and Dawes though even if he is a spud
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 23, 2013, 03:04:14 PM
amusing that i could have had picks 13, 16, 23 and 26
think i prefer having Hall, Clisby, Lamb and Dawes though even if he is a spud
Personally woulda rather the draft picks ;)
I am glad I traded most of my picks but also regret a few early trades.
dunno i needed forwards pretty badly pretty happy to have Hall and Lamb
Offering some markets for when this draft will finish
Before Christmas - $1.85
After Christmas - $11.50
Maybe you would like to narrow down a date pick your own
23rd November to 25th November - $11
26th November to 28th November - $3.5
29th November to 1st December - $2.5
2nd December to 4th December - $9
4th December to 25th December - $10.5
Tasty odds on the 2-4th. :o
Last time I placed a bet I said goodbye to $16 though. :(
4th December to 25th December - $10.5
Put off a little bit since he was drafted by the Pies. But a future gun.
Nathan Freeman
One guy still around that I just can't believe.
Quote from: vinny on November 23, 2013, 04:21:45 PM
One guy still around that I just can't believe.
Think I know who it is.
Surely he can't last until the end of the round or I'll be getting a steal at 19. :o
Yeah if he lasts that far, ridiculous. :P
nrich and ringo are up - then me.
i am going to chuck the biggest tantrum if when they take him !
Even though I know you'll take him, I'll still throw a tantrum CW :P
Nrich will be posting our pick to maintain transperancy. PM'd suggested picks this morning so hope he is about. just home and will get on with updating soon.
Quote from: Ringo on November 23, 2013, 05:47:16 PM
Nrich will be posting our pick to maintain transperancy. PM'd suggested picks this morning so hope he is about. just home and will get on with updating soon.
how does nrich posting your pick make anything transparent ? or you posting make it not transparent ? he is not around i PM him hours ago.
all good just the suspense is killing me
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 23, 2013, 05:59:30 PM
how does nrich posting your pick make anything transparent ? or you posting make it not transparent ?
Yeah, I was wondering this.
As far as drafting is concerned, I don't think you being a part of it will have any affect Ringo.
We don't want/need this draft to drag out.
im just being inpatient, Ringo has let nrich announce and run a lot of stuff, this is why i pm nrich ages ago, it is not unexpected or a problem.
all good - as long as they dont pick my guy , then it's not all good at all
#InRingoWeTrust
I really don't get how that is even relevant ???
Just pick Ringo, we don't mind. :)
I will pull rank and go Blake Acres
:o
Wow, he's still there...
I wish I can get the player I want with pick 61 :)
Sorry guys, been out this afternoon. Was actually going to pick Acres :o :P
Been doing some updating in the thread. Still got to keep an eye on team lists as well.
Typical Colli ::) making us wait..
I joke :P
Good pick lads, we were looking at him.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on November 23, 2013, 01:07:13 PM
You guys are mean :(
Luke McDonald
thats an insult that he fell that long. we almost took him at 5 torp. best pick of the draft
#nobias
im going to take a punt , this guy went far too early in the draft but I believe the blues need him and due to the early pick have plans for him.
Think he is very well suited to BXVS and will study under and eventually replace Luke Ball for the Werewolves
Patrick Cripps
An extractor, Cripps knows how to find the footy and get it out. On average, he won 12 contested disposals and six clearances a game through the under-18 championships, and 24 disposals in 13 games for the East Fremantle Colts. His size gives him an advantage. He's a big guy who bustles through, gets clearances and uses his frame to push past others. Cripps has good foot skills and finds a target most of the time.
This is ludicrous... Surely ele and the Hedgehogs won't pass the guy up. ???
I like this guy but I don't expect him to get games over Tom Bell or Nicky Graham, if he does I will be quite angry.
Quote from: vinny on November 23, 2013, 06:44:52 PM
I like this guy but I don't expect him to get games over Tom Bell or Nicky Graham, if he does I will be quite angry.
I rate both Bell and Graham... but I reckon Cripps will be better than both. The Blues picked him at 13 for a reason.
Better post this now.
Haven't decided on my pick because I'm waiting to see who gets taken. Gotta head off to church like a good Catholic lad but will be back at 7:45-8pm-ish to take my pick.
yeah i don't need him to get games until 2015, i also had to replace macrae. was a tough call but a contested inside mid in this comp is not something you can pass up. Not when you have Ball and Priddis in your midfield both on the very end of their careers.
and ablett likely to be a fwd for me in 2015 also, i need to bring through mid kids pretty quick.
Haha yeah perhaps, it wasn't really based on ability but more just would hate to see those blokes robbed of opportunity by a new kid. But that's footy, haha.
i think ele has gone out for the night :'(
Great pick Collie.
This lad is a gun. I could throw a ton of stats at you proving this point but I am not going to. Big risk but enormous reward, especially under this scoring system. Welcome,
Dayle Garlett.(http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2012/11/27/1226524/891517-dayle-garlett.jpg)
P.S. There are some biiiiig sliders! :o
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 23, 2013, 06:56:35 PM
i think ele has gone out for the night :'(
Mate, it's mid-afternoon here. Settle down :P
bugger wanted him with pick 25 :'(
yep top choice ele, if not for my ageing midifeld and my giving up 3 young high draft pick mids for Ablett it would have been this guy or another i was also loathe to pass up, think you will be well rewarded with this pick.
Leeds Leeches select:
Christian Salem
Very nice pick Ele, like you said fair bit of risk comes with him but I think it is overrated that risk. He will be very good for you! :)
Damn wanted Salem :(
Quote from: jhello on November 23, 2013, 07:02:28 PM
Leeds Leeches select:
Christian Salem
And there's the guy. Finally someone took him, should get games at Melbourne! :)
Thanks guys 8) I was certain Colli would take him!
Quote from: NigeyS on November 23, 2013, 06:43:58 PM
This is ludicrous... Surely ele and the Hedgehogs won't pass the guy up. ???
I am very interested to hear who this guy is haha
Quote from: elephants on November 23, 2013, 07:14:36 PM
Thanks guys 8) I was certain Colli would take him!
Quote from: NigeyS on November 23, 2013, 06:43:58 PM
This is ludicrous... Surely ele and the Hedgehogs won't pass the guy up. ???
I am very interested to hear who this guy is haha
i was thinkig it must be salem or garlett.
salem better than cripps for sure but better for bxvs ?
we will see, great pick tho and will be a great player. i took the less classy option in the hope he is a contested workhorse like ball.
who's up ?
I thought it was Salem to be honest.
So close to the Badgers first pick 8)
Nigey at church back soon he said
Quote from: vinny on November 23, 2013, 07:29:44 PM
I thought it was Salem to be honest.
the werewolves are a blue collar club :)
we don't want those flashy pants players, give me my dirty fringe premiums any day and we'll get it done again.
oh yeah we did bring in one flashy pants player didn't we :)
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 23, 2013, 07:32:30 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 23, 2013, 07:29:44 PM
I thought it was Salem to be honest.
the werewolves are a blue collar club :)
we don't want those flashy pants players, give me my dirty fringe premiums any day and we'll get it done again.
oh yeah we did bring in one flashy pants player didn't we :)
Capper?
Quote from: vinny on November 23, 2013, 07:29:44 PM
I thought it was Salem to be honest.
Yeah, Salem was the lad I was harping on about.
Pick will be up in 5-10 mins.
We talked about Salem... Then we remembered Garlett was better 8)
Had a bit of thinking to do here with several options to choose from. Thought about needs, thought about taking the best player available and thought about just going with my gut... and that's what I'm going to do here.
I reckon this guy should have gone in the top 20 of the draft but didn't, hoping he can get some games and become a key part of his club's future - which I reckon he will be.
With #19 - the Liverpool Lobsters will take: Lewis Taylor.
Ahhhhh flower
Lobsters are killing it so far this draft!
Good pick Nige, one of the five I was considering when taking Garlett!
While I was out at church I prayed that the guy (and/or guys on my list) I was going to take kinda early lasts until 44. :P
Quote from: NigeyS on November 23, 2013, 08:26:49 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 23, 2013, 07:29:44 PM
I thought it was Salem to be honest.
Yeah, Salem was the lad I was harping on about.
Pick will be up in 5-10 mins.
Salem will be a great player most likely but fantasy wise, esp in bxv reckon the others were better picks, except garlett.
My wish list is getting very short now :(
Haha I haven't spent a second thinking about my other picks, 47, 69 & 79! 8)
Quote from: SydneyRox on November 23, 2013, 08:56:54 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on November 23, 2013, 08:26:49 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 23, 2013, 07:29:44 PM
I thought it was Salem to be honest.
Yeah, Salem was the lad I was harping on about.
Pick will be up in 5-10 mins.
Salem will be a great player most likely but fantasy wise, esp in bxv reckon the others were better picks, except garlett.
If Garlett can be half the WAFL player he was as an 18/19 year old at AFL level, we will have a premium fwd on our hands. And he's a year ahead in development! #notcomplaining
Last live pick is 44. Then I get my subsidiary picks to get my senior list to 39. And finally elevating both Biscuits and Croz to get 41.
has 9 picks left lol
I don't think we will have enough players! :P
Quote from: vinny on November 23, 2013, 09:49:47 PM
I don't think we will have enough players! :P
well i should be ok 6 of my 10 picks are #56 or earlier then i have 4 picks to bring list to 41 2 of which using on promotions but the other 2 might be a concern
I guess there is people skipping too. I could do that and take rookie picks but my rookie list is pretty bad haha.
Yeah, hopefully a few skips should see me get some semi-decent lads who may or may not play games with my three subsidiary picks.
So BXV are averaging 1 pick every page. I remember this is exactly how the first draft went.
Quote from: Noz on November 23, 2013, 10:02:36 PM
So BXV are averaging 1 pick every page. I remember this is exactly how the first draft went.
cool story ;D
Swaggers select Zachary Merrett
Lez has given me free choice on a pick here, seeing as we're in flag contention we'll select a mature body in Matt Fuller
good pick did you pm the giants?
Yup, 8)
Quote from: specky92 on November 24, 2013, 09:30:14 AM
Yup, 8)
(http://www.gsparkplug.com/shop/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/5e06319eda06f020e43594a9c230972d/c/h/champion_rz7c.jpg)
Garlett, Taylor and Merrett I all really wanted :(
I wonder how many coaches are passing on their picks in the next couple rounds because their list is full.
I need 3 players, my first pick is 62 ;D
Are there players that are not on our lists that we can pick aswell ? (not draft players)
I need 3 now and my first is 47 I think.
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 11:40:36 AM
I wonder how many coaches are passing on their picks in the next couple rounds because their list is full.
It's easy to work out in the team list thread it says how many picks they have
Won't be anyone skipping this round I think not sure there will be skipping until the 3rd or 4th round
If we run out of players what happens? Since we can't select delisted players in this draft, it's probably going to fall short :/
Quote from: Spite on November 24, 2013, 12:15:46 PM
If we run out of players what happens? Since we can't select delisted players in this draft, it's probably going to fall short :/
Pretty sure we will be ok there are a few guys not on BXV lists we can select also
KB is that you with the camera ?
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 24, 2013, 12:28:56 PM
KB is that you with the camera ?
Wish I could edit him out :(
shady flano, i wore one of those in the 80's but i wasn't old then :)
Hmmm... couldn't decide out of two players
guess I'll go Hartung. Hopefully not too long before he gets games.
i messaged Jukesy
Can't a guy get his 12 hours sleep without being hounded to pick from across the country? :P
We'll select Zak Jones
Quote from: Jukes on November 24, 2013, 01:42:00 PM
Can't a guy get his 12 hours sleep without being hounded to pick from across the country? :P
NO..
might get through a few today tabs is online ;D
Quote from: Jukes on November 24, 2013, 01:42:00 PM
Can't a guy get his 12 hours sleep without being hounded to pick from across the country? :P
We'll select Zak Jones
Dont be silly of course you cant
Nipper Gordon please
bit left field here but 144DT average to good to pass up
Riley Knight
messaged Colli
just got home pick be up in 10-15
Toby Nankervis
would have likes zak Jones with this pick but pretty much knew if i didnt take him at 16 i wouldn't get him, so better get my need of a ruckman out of the way.
have PM os, who is his co-coach ?
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 24, 2013, 03:34:53 PM
have PM os, who is his co-coach ?
I literally just messages os and memph lol
Sorry teams, won't be far away.....
Guys to be fair to all who traded as per the rules this is how the balance of the draft will work.
When all 62 players are taken in the National draft and if Rookie draft is completed - (Scheduled for Wednesday). Then we will complete the 3 Rounds of the Rookie PSD.
After these 3 rounds we will then go back to teams still to complete their lists and they will select from remaining players to complete lists as per initial draft.
As this was not in original planning for this year only at conclussion of drafts you will be allowed to nominate your 4 rookies. That is you are not committed to your rookies selected, I think this is the fairest way to go this year.
Considered a few other options but they disadvantaged certain coaches so have ruled as above.
With clubs also reducing their playing lists we may have to look at reducing our lists to 44.
should not be as big an issue next season Ringo as all our lists are "better" and we probably wont want to delist as many players, and therefore need to draft as many. just like in the AFL. plenty of passing.
so just for my own clarifiaction. am i ok under this change to change nothing at all ?
take my nat picks, make my nat rookie elevation, then take my rook picks.
which all done will have my senior list full at end of our nat draft, and my rook list full at end of our rook draft ?
So after we have 45 players we then nominate our rookies? And can be anyone ?
Sounds good
I like it. Cya spuds, your getting demoted :P
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 24, 2013, 05:06:33 PM
should not be as big an issue next season Ringo as all our lists are "better" and we probably wont want to delist as many players, and therefore need to draft as many. just like in the AFL. plenty of passing.
so just for my own clarifiaction. am i ok under this change to change nothing at all ?
take my nat picks, make my nat rookie elevation, then take my rook picks.
which all done will have my senior list full at end of our nat draft, and my rook list full at end of our rook draft ?
Correct Collie. You can take advantage of naming 4 rookies at conclusion of your drafting if you wish as well.
Quote from: ossie85 on November 24, 2013, 04:46:06 PM
Sorry teams, won't be far away.....
Jarman Impey come on down.....
Quote from: ossie85 on November 24, 2013, 05:27:55 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on November 24, 2013, 04:46:06 PM
Sorry teams, won't be far away.....
Jarman Impey come on down.....
sounds like a character from lord of the rings, but looks like a player :)
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 24, 2013, 05:32:00 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on November 24, 2013, 05:27:55 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on November 24, 2013, 04:46:06 PM
Sorry teams, won't be far away.....
Jarman Impey come on down.....
sounds like a character from lord of the rings, but looks like a player :)
Short enough to fit a role in the movie lol would be a hobbit
Falcons select:
Darcy Lang
who's next :) moving along nicely now
just messaged tabs
our next pick is #50 :'(
but then have 4 in the space of 8 lol
Quote from: Spinking on November 24, 2013, 05:48:23 PM
Falcons select:
Darcy Lang
I couldn't choose between Hartung and Lang, Hartung seemed to have slightly better stats...
hope I made the right pick...
Hey this thread says our next pick is a pass but we delisted Jolly and Sheridan in order to be able to take it?
So we should have two picks available. One possibly a rookie upgrade but still.
Yeah that reminds me, we should what BB thought of in AXV. If you know you are passing a pick maybe let Ringo know so we don't have to wait for you. Reckon it would be good but Ringos call.
where are them steins ?
Sorry memph and Oss - Rebuilt my PC and some adjustments I made in NZ were not carried through.
Can everyone one check the team list thread and if I have made an error please advise. Any errors are not intentional but may be a result of PC rebuild.
Do we announce NAT picks we are using to elevate when we take the actual pick?
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 08:02:23 PM
Do we announce NAT picks we are using to elevate when we take the actual pick?
Yep. When it comes around. Say the name and state you're elevating them.
With the change in rules for this year only where you are able to nominate your rookiies it may not be necessary to use picks to promote unless you want to take part in the rookie draft.
Quote from: Ringo on November 24, 2013, 07:49:31 PM
Sorry memph and Oss - Rebuilt my PC and some adjustments I made in NZ were not carried through.
Can everyone one check the team list thread and if I have made an error please advise. Any errors are not intentional but may be a result of PC rebuild.
Only 1 I can see on my list Ringo. Todd Banfield has been delisted but is still on my list.
Doing a terrific job mate.
Oh okay, thanks Nige. And yes Ringo, I wanna use a rookie draft pick instead of my late NAT. :)
Just nominate the pick to be used Vinny as it get near
No worries!
situation i have though
i was going to use 2 of my 4 extra picks to upgrade Sutcliffe and Michie and i have 3 first round rookie picks i want to use so have to make room
what do i do?
Pretty sure rookie picks can go onto the senior list? But could be entirely wrong
Kb - you can still upgrade by nominating the national picks you wish to use to elevate Sutcliffe and Michie. Then you can use you 3 picks to draft rookies and your 3rd round pick if required.
Quote from: Ringo on November 24, 2013, 09:07:57 PM
Kb - you can still upgrade by nominating the national picks you wish to use to elevate Sutcliffe and Michie. Then you can use you 3 picks to draft rookies and your 3rd round pick if required.
but i was going to use the extra picks to bring list to 41 to do that i feel a bit disadvantaged if i have to use my picks #56 or earlier because i traded for earlier picks
so can i still use the extra picks to promote them or?
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 24, 2013, 09:12:57 PM
Quote from: Ringo on November 24, 2013, 09:07:57 PM
Kb - you can still upgrade by nominating the national picks you wish to use to elevate Sutcliffe and Michie. Then you can use you 3 picks to draft rookies and your 3rd round pick if required.
but i was going to use the extra picks to bring list to 41 to do that i feel a bit disadvantaged if i have to use my picks #56 or earlier because i traded for earlier picks
so can i still use the extra picks to promote them or?
Up to you to work out how best to get your team to 41 players and 4 rookies with the change in rules for this year only. You have the option of taking Your Draft picks as they come or use to upgrade rookies and take the early picks in the rookie draft. Either way you have the option of naming 4 rookie with final list lodgements.
ok so to put it simply to make sure i got it right
i can pick with my 4 remaining NAT picks
use my 4 rookie picks (even though 2 currently listed as rookies)
use what ever picks to bring senior list to 41 players
then nominate which 4 players i want to be rookies from the 45 players on the list even if i have not promoted Sutcliffe and Michie?
sorry just like to make sure i understand things
Yeah, I wanna know too because I was gonna use 73 to elevate Matt Arnot and 91 to elevate Hayden Crozier, but if I don't have to... I rather not.
Yes KB but your list must not exceed 45 players. Think you are ok with the number of picks in both drafts but have not done a full check as yet.
If I understand correctly, it's just a matter of whether you want to use your rookie picks or NAT picks.
Quote from: Ringo on November 24, 2013, 09:44:26 PM
Yes KB but your list must not exceed 45 players. Think you are ok with the number of picks in both drafts but have not done a full check as yet.
yeah should be fine have 35 players currently in total 4 remaining NAT Picks and 4 rookie picks then will need to pick two players in the left over draft
Basically, if I use Nat picks to elevate, I get 3 rookie picks and still have another 4 Nat picks to take.
If I don't, I get 1 rookie pick and have another 6 Nat picks to take.
I think I prefer the first option.
Quote from: NigeyS on November 24, 2013, 09:50:17 PM
Basically, if I use Nat picks to elevate, I get 3 rookie picks and still have another 4 Nat picks to take.
If I don't, I get 1 rookie pick and have another 6 Nat picks to take.
I think I prefer the first option.
my understanding is any rookie listed players you have automatically get senior listed then you take all your remaining picks then decide which 4 players to rookie list once have 45 players
you have confused me again :'(
As I said it is up to you all how you manage your lists now with the rule change allowing you to nominate your 4 rookies when finalising lists.
Okay, cheers lads. I get it. :)
Quote from: Ringo on November 24, 2013, 09:54:41 PM
As I said it is up to you all how you manage your lists now with the rule change allowing you to nominate your 4 rookies when finalising lists.
right so any current rookie lists are put onto senior list without needing to promote them i think
Indirectly KB that is correct - but bear in mind we only have 62 players available in the National Draft so need to factor that in in your strategies.
So going back to what I posted
National Draft players all picked
3 Rounds of Rookie Draft
Balance of picks to bring lists to 45 players.
Pretty much if you use NAT picks to elevate, you take more rookie picks.
Or you can just take your NAT picks and then select your rookies at the end.
Malcolm Karpany
so yeah pick 62 players and or promote rookies (if anyone does now) in national draft.
then do 3 rounds of rookie draft with allocated picks. (complete bxvs rookie draft)
then the nat draft starts again from where it left off when it ran out of players.
this right ? sorry just making sure also
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 10:06:47 PM
Pretty much if you use NAT picks to elevate, you take more rookie picks.
Or you can just take your NAT picks and then select your rookies at the end.
you don't need to promote anyone rookie lists are cancelled
Yeah but you are still allowed to if you want to take more rookie picks rather than your late NAT picks.
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 24, 2013, 10:10:02 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 10:06:47 PM
Pretty much if you use NAT picks to elevate, you take more rookie picks.
Or you can just take your NAT picks and then select your rookies at the end.
you don't need to promote anyone rookie lists are cancelled
but the point was - if you do with a late pick before the nat draft runs out of players then you get to use your rook picks in the rook draft ( if you have enough) to pick players to fill your list/s rather than wait until after the rookie draft to do it.
so ultimately you get your picks sooner by using more rook picks ( again if you have them ). or am i wrong ?
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 10:11:02 PM
Yeah but you are still allowed to if you want to take more rookie picks rather than your late NAT picks.
no cause there are only 3 rounds in 3 rookie draft so you cant take extra picks then we do another draft to make lists 45
then you pick 4 rookies from the 45 players
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 24, 2013, 10:13:23 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 10:11:02 PM
Yeah but you are still allowed to if you want to take more rookie picks rather than your late NAT picks.
no cause there are only 3 rounds in 3 rookie draft so you cant take extra picks then we do another draft to make lists 45
then you pick 4 rookies from the 45 players
what if you have 8 picks in the first 3 rounds of the rookie draft? i know rook picks werent traded early but from memory some were late....
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 24, 2013, 10:15:24 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 24, 2013, 10:13:23 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 10:11:02 PM
Yeah but you are still allowed to if you want to take more rookie picks rather than your late NAT picks.
no cause there are only 3 rounds in 3 rookie draft so you cant take extra picks then we do another draft to make lists 45
then you pick 4 rookies from the 45 players
what if you have 8 picks in the first 3 rounds of the rookie draft? i know rook picks werent traded early but from memory some were late....
you couldn't because there are only 4 spots on the rookie list that hypothetical is impossible
i'm getting a headache lol
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 24, 2013, 10:13:23 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 10:11:02 PM
Yeah but you are still allowed to if you want to take more rookie picks rather than your late NAT picks.
no cause there are only 3 rounds in 3 rookie draft so you cant take extra picks then we do another draft to make lists 45
then you pick 4 rookies from the 45 players
I was Intially going to take 3 more NAT picks and 3 rookie picks to fill my rookie list.
If I use my last NAT pick to upgrade Bews, I can take another rookie pick.
But as I am typing this I have realised your point, I can't take 4 rookie picks cause there is only 3 rounds ;D
and after the rookie draft, if our list isn't at 45 we just come back to NAT draft right?
so the only way to have more than 3 rook picks ( if you have them through trade) is to have promoted one or more rooks in the nat draft and therefore if you delisted enough have all 4 spots on your rook list vacant - then you can take 4 :)
good pick by the way TABS :)
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 10:20:44 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 24, 2013, 10:13:23 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 10:11:02 PM
Yeah but you are still allowed to if you want to take more rookie picks rather than your late NAT picks.
no cause there are only 3 rounds in 3 rookie draft so you cant take extra picks then we do another draft to make lists 45
then you pick 4 rookies from the 45 players
I was Intially going to take 3 more NAT picks and 3 rookie picks to fill my rookie list.
If I use my last NAT pick to upgrade Bews, I can take another rookie pick.
But as I am typing this I have realised your point, I can't take 4 rookie picks cause there is only 3 rounds ;D
and after the rookie draft, if our list isn't at 45 we just come back to NAT draft right?
yeah but not really back to the NAT Draft just a new draft with whatever players are left
I am totally confused as to how the list management for this works so if someone wants to send me a PM walking me through it, that would be much appreciated. Thanks a lot haha
Quote from: elephants on November 24, 2013, 10:36:45 PM
I am totally confused as to how the list management for this works so if someone wants to send me a PM walking me through it, that would be much appreciated. Thanks a lot haha
facepalm, will do
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 24, 2013, 10:32:47 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 10:20:44 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 24, 2013, 10:13:23 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 24, 2013, 10:11:02 PM
Yeah but you are still allowed to if you want to take more rookie picks rather than your late NAT picks.
no cause there are only 3 rounds in 3 rookie draft so you cant take extra picks then we do another draft to make lists 45
then you pick 4 rookies from the 45 players
I was Intially going to take 3 more NAT picks and 3 rookie picks to fill my rookie list.
If I use my last NAT pick to upgrade Bews, I can take another rookie pick.
But as I am typing this I have realised your point, I can't take 4 rookie picks cause there is only 3 rounds ;D
and after the rookie draft, if our list isn't at 45 we just come back to NAT draft right?
yeah but not really back to the NAT Draft just a new draft with whatever players are left
yeah but using the draft order from where the nat draft left off when it runs out of players to pick?
I would assume so, I think I get it all now. Cheers KB and Colli :)
not sure on that one
don't thank me i am clueless KB seems to know what he is on about tho :)
a PM to ringo is probably the safest thing to clear it up if your not sure.
I really hope I get the player I want at 61!!! :P
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 24, 2013, 10:52:39 PM
don't thank me i am clueless KB seems to know what he is on about tho :)
a PM to ringo is probably the safest thing to clear it up if your not sure.
it's a cool trick isn't sounding like i know what i'm on about lol
to put it simply though
all teams currently only have one list due to the rule change no rookie listed players
once you have drafted 45 players you nominate 4 rookies of your choice can be anyone
Damn if SydneyRox picked in the last hour or so, we could have went flying through like 6 or something picks cause is just NRich and Colli!
im good to go for a few hours, but work all day tomorrow till early evening :(
actually had a pretty good run drafting today tho.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 24, 2013, 11:00:09 PM
im good to go for a few hours, but work all day tomorrow till early evening :(
actually had a pretty good run drafting today tho.
SR normally comes on late most nights remember from drafting with him in AXVIII lol
seeing as though your next after SR if you want you can send me a couple of preferences if he doesnt pick before you go to bed then i can post it for you
Yeah pretty sure Nate will be at school so we can probably kill it from about 5 or whenever he finishes and gets home or whatever.
will do KB.
+10 good bloke points to KB 8)
Quote from: elephants on November 24, 2013, 11:16:03 PM
+10 good bloke points to KB 8)
just vote for me for the Dustin Fletcher award :P
Cam McCarthy
nice :)
yeah i was going to find it hard not to take him if you did not, makes this pick easier at least
Mitch Honeychurch
i'll message nrich and ringo
nrich might pick before school he usually comes on ;D
i'll pm you my next pick option KB as i will be out all day tomorrow.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 25, 2013, 12:45:27 AM
i'll pm you my next pick option KB as i will be out all day tomorrow.
lol just messaged you about that ;)
Darcy Gardiner and Jarrad Jensen
Werwolves, Breakers, Breakers, Werewolves, Breaker :o
flower it jansen was my pick.
Malcolm Karpany
and you missed on Whatlez it went werewolves, breakers, breakers, werewolves, breakers, werewolves
We'll take J Kolo, Jake Kolodjashnij
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 25, 2013, 08:49:56 AM
flower it jansen was my pick.
Malcolm Karpany
and you missed on Whatlez it went werewolves, breakers, breakers, werewolves, breakers, werewolves
Quote from: tabs on November 24, 2013, 10:08:39 PM
Malcolm Karpany
Don't mean to intrude guys as I'm only a lowly assistant, but tabs picked Karpany not long before you CW - don't want to see you miss out on a player you want :)
Colli should take JK
Quote from: Toga on November 25, 2013, 09:19:58 AM
Don't mean to intrude guys as I'm only the best assistant in BXVs, but tabs picked Karpany not long before you CW - don't want to see you miss out on a player you want :)
FTFY.
We will hold the draft till Colli takes his pick to be fair to him. Apologies guys but I am not a late nighter so was unable to keep list up to date. Went out last night as well.
Regarding the draft
If by chance you have more than 3 rookie picks in the three rounds you will take them in the rookie draft,
After the Rookie Draft we will resume the National Draft from where we were when all players were taken until such time as all lists are complete. I will finalise the subsidiary list in due course but it again will be on the loop draft as per table positions. Prior to the rookie/PSD I will update the draft ordere in rookie draft to list all picks required to bring lists to 45.
Could you also check the lists in the team thread to verify they are correct and advise me of any errors as these will be the lists I will be working from to obtain the final draft order. Link to team lists below:
http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,87321.msg1220708.html#msg1220708
If any one wants further information or not sure please pm me. Know it appears complicated but hopefully just a one off with the shallow draft this year and the number of delistings retirements.
Quote from: NigeyS on November 25, 2013, 09:32:44 AM
Quote from: Toga on November 25, 2013, 09:19:58 AM
Don't mean to intrude guys as I'm only the best assistant in BXVs, but tabs picked Karpany not long before you CW - don't want to see you miss out on a player you want :)
FTFY.
Haha thank you kindly :)
I just posted Collis next pick but seems he has to pick again given the circumstances I prob should not post it
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 25, 2013, 10:52:14 AM
I just posted Collis next pick but seems he has to pick again given the circumstances I prob should not post it
He has 2 picks to do KB so it is appropriate to wait until he is back on. I have sent him a pm advising this as well.
Jukes will then be up with 2 picks so expect Jukes to be picking tonight,
Cool I'm going back to sleep or trying to lol
so confirming that we dont have to elevate players from the rookie to the seniors list via the draft??
That would be the case as you are able to nominate rookies.
Awesome. So I could not elevate players and still take 3 rookie picks if I wanted.
Still deciding.
Think this is the fairest way given the number of picks people will still have available.
All teams will have the picks currently allocated to them in the three rounds of the national Draft providing they have that number of vacant positions. For example some teams may not have 3 vacant positions for three rounds.
Here is the current Rookie Draft order for the three rounds:
http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,87064.0.html
Just to double check, we're waiting on Colli to re-pick?
Yes Nigey Collie has to repick plus has the next pick as well.
first pick: Cameron Giles
second pick: James Sicily
pm sent to the next guy :) sorry for delay.
Round 2 complete Jukes with 2 picks and only 26 players left in draft.
Jonathan Marsh
and
Jay Kennedy-Harris
Basically got one of these guys for free, traded Simon Black for pick 37 :P
Solid picks, but more importantly... My list is intact! ;D
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now. :)
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now. :)
I don't mean to alarm you, but it is Torp's pick.
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now that AXV has finished drafting. :)
Quote from: NigeyS on November 25, 2013, 07:05:14 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now. :)
I don't mean to alarm you, but it is Torp's pick.
Hahaha.
Quote from: Ricochet on November 25, 2013, 07:05:44 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now that AXV has finished drafting. :)
Quote from: Ricochet on November 25, 2013, 07:05:44 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now that AXV has finished drafting. :)
Quote from: Ricochet on November 25, 2013, 07:05:44 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now that AXV has finished drafting. :)
Not even phased, BXV still the best. ;)
Quote from: Jukes on November 25, 2013, 07:01:18 PM
Basically got one of these guys for free, traded Simon Black for pick 37 :P
Thank me later. :P
Quote from: NigeyS on November 25, 2013, 07:05:14 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now. :)
I don't mean to alarm you, but it is Torp's pick.
Followed by Nails
don't pick on nails, he's my favourite >:(
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 25, 2013, 07:37:25 PM
don't pick on nails, he's my favourite >:(
And he just took the last pick (pass) in the Asians draft. So we're finished.
Meanwhile we're still waiting for our second pick here..Got someone in mind specifically given this scoring system. Hoping he slips to us.
Aish, Merrett, Jones, Marsh and Kennedy-Harris so far, I'm happy with that :)
Now just need one more nat/pre-season selection and another rookie selection to complete my list I think.
nice selections jukes.
Michael Apeness
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:06:39 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on November 25, 2013, 07:05:14 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now. :)
I don't mean to alarm you, but it is Torp's pick.
Hahaha.Quote from: Ricochet on November 25, 2013, 07:05:44 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now that AXV has finished drafting. :)
Quote from: Ricochet on November 25, 2013, 07:05:44 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now that AXV has finished drafting. :)
Quote from: Ricochet on November 25, 2013, 07:05:44 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now that AXV has finished drafting. :)
Not even phased, BXV still the best. ;)
AXV the place to be ;)
Now we wait on Nails
Quote from: NigeyS on November 25, 2013, 07:05:14 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now. :)
I don't mean to alarm you, but it is Torp's pick.
I picked immediately when I came on.
have fun being bored AXV
we do things at a nice steady pace
Haha we know you do mate, it's just the when I come on bit that generally takes a while. ;)
Quote from: Torpedo10 on November 25, 2013, 09:03:46 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on November 25, 2013, 07:05:14 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now. :)
I don't mean to alarm you, but it is Torp's pick.
I picked immediately when I came on.
everyone loves you torp....
but that won't stop them picking on you ;D
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 25, 2013, 09:04:26 PM
have fun being bored AXV
we do things at a nice steady pace
Bored? :o more banter than any other comp ;) heck, we even stretch out and banter other comps :o
You can never be bored in AXV :)
I had somebody picked but unpicked him...
I'm confused whether he's a defender or a midfielder... got some conflicting results ???
you're a "conflicting result" ;D
Use this if you cant find them on Mr Craigs page
http://www.scpaige.com.au/2013-national-draft-verdict/
There's a Mr. Craig page? link? lol
I was confused because afl.com.au lists him as a midfielder but scpaige says he's a defender... ???
http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,86925.0.html
Surely you already know the page man. :P It's awesome for all of this draft stuff. Mr C is the king of rookies.
champion data decides what position they will be, but all i have in my prospectus is the potential top 25, probably all picked by now anyway, and besides their opinion of which player will be which position has probably changed a year on anyway.
i would go with what the AFL site lists them as, but you never know....
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 25, 2013, 09:07:22 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on November 25, 2013, 09:03:46 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on November 25, 2013, 07:05:14 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Well done lads, we are moving quicker now. :)
I don't mean to alarm you, but it is Torp's pick.
I picked immediately when I came on.
everyone loves you torp....
but that won't stop them picking on you ;D
Colli gets it!
Torpy <3 :-*
With about 100% uncertainty and due to the fact he was picked before the other 2 I was considering for a reason...
I'll go Daniel McStay
"Top 10 disposal efficiency at TAC Cup Level
Top 5 for contested marking in the TAC Cup"
Are a bit hard to pass up.
i messaged jehlo
Leeds Leeches will select:
Nick Robertson
Praying those pesky Badgers and Bunnies don't take my boy(s)! ;D
Quote from: jhello on November 25, 2013, 10:14:51 PM
Leeds Leeches will select:
Nick Robertson
super choice, was hard to pass him up, extremely contested player. super choice for this comp.
Praying atleast two players fall to my pick so i get a choice :P
Wouldn't want to hold up the draft soooooo we'll take Tom Nicholls partner in crime Jack Leslie, I've pm'd next
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 25, 2013, 10:24:57 PM
Quote from: jhello on November 25, 2013, 10:14:51 PM
Leeds Leeches will select:
Nick Robertson
super choice, was hard to pass him up, extremely contested player. super choice for this comp.
I couldn't choose between him and McStay
but McStay got me with his contest talent and his ability to play forward/mid/defence.
Maybe I should have gone to Robertson? :o
Well done boys, honestly think we can be at Pick 60 by tomorrow this time. :)
I don't know who coaches the bunnies, could someone please message them or post who it is so I can, whatever's easier
Quote from: specky92 on November 25, 2013, 10:42:42 PM
I don't know who coaches the bunnies, could someone please message them or post who it is so I can, whatever's easier
PM'd :)
sydney rox
man your sharp vinny :)
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 10:44:07 PM
Quote from: specky92 on November 25, 2013, 10:42:42 PM
I don't know who coaches the bunnies, could someone please message them or post who it is so I can, whatever's easier
PM'd :)
cheers beautiful, ;)
No worries :))
i have #50, #52, #54 and #56 so we should fly through 50-60 ;D
Hopefully Matt (SR) gets on soonish, keen as beans to take my next pick (and I still have more to take) ;D
Haha didnt know his name was Matt, Hi Matt :P :)
Quote from: NigeyS on November 25, 2013, 10:16:55 PM
Praying those pesky Badgers and Bunnies don't take my boy(s)! ;D
hope i get it right :)
Quote from: vinny on November 25, 2013, 10:48:55 PM
Haha didnt know his name was Matt, Hi Matt :P :)
mine is also since we are getting personal ???
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 25, 2013, 10:47:39 PM
i have #50, #52, #54 and #56 so we should fly through 50-60 ;D
We have #46 and #53! Go, go, go!
ok tough call here.
Not sure how long until he gets decent gametime, but my ruck stocks are thin
Welcome to Blackpool Rory Lobb
*another good WA boy! 8)
Quote from: SydneyRox on November 25, 2013, 10:59:54 PM
ok tough call here.
Not sure how long until he gets decent gametime, but my ruck stocks are thin
Welcome to Blackpool Rory Lobb
*another good WA boy! 8)
BOLLOCKS. >:(
Give me a few. Consulting Sir Togalot.
sorry mate :-[
i actually thought it wad someone else
Everyone be good blokes and let me get my mate at pick 61 :)
Quote from: whatlez on November 25, 2013, 11:05:03 PM
Everyone be good blokes and let me get my mate at pick 61 :)
LOL good luck....
Quote from: whatlez on November 25, 2013, 11:05:03 PM
Everyone be good blokes and let me get my mate at pick 61 :)
don't even know who it is lol
Same, my apologies if I pick him. Hope it's not one of the few I got in mind. :-\
Well, I do have a nice list going... and making Lobb my next pick was a last minute switcheroo.
Was originally tossing up between Lobb, another lad and this bloke.
Todd Goldstein is a jet, but if he goes down, I don't wanna have to rely on Jake Spencer.
It just so happens that this lad just got picked up by Goldy's team.
Truth be told though, what sold me was the 'fro. ;D
Ben Brown, book your ticket to Merseyside! 8)
ffs Lobb and Brown were high up on my short list flower me
i guess its about the time people start picking for position as well
unless memph picks for os i think we are done for the night did well today though
Ringo, just in case it matters the Werewolves are doing the following with our remaining picks:
#70 - elevate Tom Hickey to the senior list
#88 - PASS
#90 - PASS
#106 - PASS
#108 - PASS
(Leaves my senior list full).
In the rookie draft I will be taking all 3 of my available picks (18,36,54) to fill the 3 vacant spots on my rookie list (after promoting Tom Hickey)
As per the rules that are now in place.
Matt Arnot and Hayden Crozier will go to my senior list.
I then need 3 more NAT picks to fill my senior list.
I have 2 more NAT picks as per listed rounds.
At the end of this draft I'll have 1 vacant spot on my senior list.
This means I'll go into the Rookie Draft with 3 vacant spots on that list
Which ultimately leaves me to pick 1 more player from the remaining pool of players.
I think that's about as clear as I can make it. :)
Therefore, I WILL be taking my final two picks in this draft (73 and 91) should there be enough players.
Oh man, lez and I didn't even see Lobb, he's nicely tucked in there with a short name + GWS :(
Quote from: specky92 on November 25, 2013, 11:52:52 PM
Oh man, lez and I didn't even see Lobb, he's nicely tucked in there with a short name + GWS :(
Hahaha, I reckon. I skimmed over and missed him myself! When Toges chucked his name up via PC, I had to CTRL+F and double-check he was there and to my delight he was... Too bad he was stolen from right under my nose at #43. :(
Quote from: specky92 on November 25, 2013, 11:52:52 PM
Oh man, lez and I didn't even see Lobb, he's nicely tucked in there with a short name + GWS :(
#shouldntdependonmiddrsftpicks
Quote from: whatlez on November 25, 2013, 11:58:52 PM
Quote from: specky92 on November 25, 2013, 11:52:52 PM
Oh man, lez and I didn't even see Lobb, he's nicely tucked in there with a short name + GWS :(
#shouldntdependonmiddrsftpicks
Every player in the league was drafted in some way at some point. I'd say relying on strong drafting is fairly justified.. ;)
Quote from: specky92 on November 25, 2013, 11:52:52 PM
Oh man, lez and I didn't even see Lobb, he's nicely tucked in there with a short name + GWS :(
i was pretty happy! still not sure when he starts playing?
hopefully he gets a trade to the swans when pyke gets on a bit 8)
Quote from: SydneyRox on November 26, 2013, 12:07:12 AM
Quote from: specky92 on November 25, 2013, 11:52:52 PM
Oh man, lez and I didn't even see Lobb, he's nicely tucked in there with a short name + GWS :(
i was pretty happy! still not sure when he starts playing?
hopefully he gets a trade to the swans when pyke gets on a bit 8)
Really? Won't Naismith and Nank be enough? :P
Quote from: elephants on November 26, 2013, 12:05:42 AM
Quote from: whatlez on November 25, 2013, 11:58:52 PM
Quote from: specky92 on November 25, 2013, 11:52:52 PM
Oh man, lez and I didn't even see Lobb, he's nicely tucked in there with a short name + GWS :(
#shouldntdependonmiddrsftpicks
Every player in the league was drafted in some way at some point. I'd say relying on strong drafting is fairly justified.. ;)
#shortterm #yolo
Quote from: stew42 on November 26, 2013, 12:07:59 AM
Quote from: SydneyRox on November 26, 2013, 12:07:12 AM
Quote from: specky92 on November 25, 2013, 11:52:52 PM
Oh man, lez and I didn't even see Lobb, he's nicely tucked in there with a short name + GWS :(
i was pretty happy! still not sure when he starts playing?
hopefully he gets a trade to the swans when pyke gets on a bit 8)
Really? Won't Naismith and Nank be enough? :P
yup, but i just want another swan on my BXV team! ;D
Quote from: SydneyRox on November 26, 2013, 12:07:12 AM
hopefully he gets a trade to the swans when pyke gets on a bit 8)
Giles -> Adelaide
Mummy & Lobb Combo at GWS in 2015 ;)
Quote from: elephants on November 26, 2013, 12:19:57 AM
Quote from: SydneyRox on November 26, 2013, 12:07:12 AM
hopefully he gets a trade to the swans when pyke gets on a bit 8)
Giles -> Adelaide
Mummy & Lobb Combo at GWS in 2015 ;)
hope so!
Well Ossie knows who I'd like to take here and I think he'd be pretty alright with me taking this pick given that I PM'd him before with a list of guys including my #1 and he seemed keen. There is only one other guy on that list who is still available as well and he didn't mention anyone else he liked.
So the Cruisers select Jake Barrett.
I think most won't know much about him and have ignored him given how late he was taken but that was only because he was a zone selection.
GWS' last zone selection was Zac Williams who turned out really well and he only went on the rookie list where as Barrett goes straight to the senior list which says to me he's even better than Williams
Had had he been available for other clubs in the AFL draft I believe he would have gone Top 30. He looks like a good inside midfielder who has drawn comparisons to Kieran Jack - mainly because he's the second cousin of some former NRL legend.
He's also Bruest's second cousin and we all know how he turned out.
Aside from being a good inside midfielder I watched his highlights package and he has a great eye for goal which is also a plus and I can see this contested scoring system suiting him down to the ground.
i messaged Ele
6 of the past 10 picks were players we wanted with this pick ::) good picking lads :P
Pick up soon.
Nick Holman.
Contested ball machine, will be great if given the opportunity!
great pick ele, considered him even as far back as i was, contested ball is his middle name.
Thanks Col, yeah he loves it. Hoping he can turn into a Hutch/JT v2 ;)
I have given Vin a few names to choose and he hasn't said who he wants yet so i can't pick for the owls but Vin should pick tomorrow. Sorry lads.
Sorry for the hold up fellas, Owls will be picking SAM LLOYD. Cheers Noz.
Leeds Leeches will be passing the rest of their picks. (#58, 77, 95)
My list has been smashed these past few picks. :( It's a long wait to #73!
There won't be enough players to get to #73... :(
May not get to use it Nigey with only 62 players,
Just realised that haha, still need another three picks for my senior lists... EVERYBODY PASS.
Tom Cutler.
So that's me done, my 41 senior spots filled up. :)
Still got use my Pick 69, elevation with Pick 79. Then it's three picks in the rookie draft and one more to finish my list.
Quote from: PowerBug on November 26, 2013, 10:04:01 AM
Tom Cutler.
So that's me done, my 41 senior spots filled up. :)
Argh!!!
Bugger really wanted Sam Lloyd
Quote from: PowerBug on November 26, 2013, 10:04:01 AM
Tom Cutler.
So that's me done, my 41 senior spots filled up. :)
Surprised he lasted this long!
My 3 boys I was tossing up were Tom Cutler, Daniel McStay and Nick Robertson
still not certain I made the right choice, all 3 very similar
Cutler and Holman probably would have been my next choices after Barrett so some good picks there.
If we want to we should just get another pick at 62. Though there could only be one guy to choose from lol.
So ready to get through my 4 picks today :)
Bunnies will use Pick 80 to bring Zac Williams onto the Senior List.
Leaving 2 picks in the Rookie
I will be passing on picks 60 and 78.
For Nat Pick 96 i will be upgrading Brandon Jack.
I will be using 3 picks in the rookie/Pre-season draft
We don't need to use picks to promote people do we?
As far as I'm aware my team doesn't have a rookie list yet :s lol
Falcons select
Sean Lemmons
Mitch Harvey
Someone PM the next coach please
Since it's highly unlikely that I'll get to use 73 and 91 considering the amount of players left in the pool.
I'll elevate Matt Arnot with 73 and Hayden Crozier with 91. :)
Next coach is nrich who is at school - I have PM'd him this morning with suggestions so hopefully will not be long when he gets home. We will probably have a conversation and then post. Quite a few from our initial list have obviously been taken so would prefer to consult and sorry for delay.
Pick 69 probably won't exist so I'll just upgrade Jed Bews with it. Or should I use 79?
Need one more person to pass so i get a pick :P
Quote from: vinny on November 26, 2013, 04:28:39 PM
Pick 69 probably won't exist so I'll just upgrade Jed Bews with it. Or should I use 79?
I feel this comment would be more appropriate if KB was making it.... ;)
Quote from: vinny on November 26, 2013, 04:28:39 PM
Pick 69 probably won't exist so I'll just upgrade Jed Bews with it. Or should I use 79?
Lets keep pick 69. ;)
Going to get a pick!! :)
I want to elevate MARLEY WILLIAMS with my round 6 pick, is this ok?
Quote from: Torpedo10 on November 26, 2013, 05:20:41 PM
I want to elevate MARLEY WILLIAMS with my round 6 pick, is this ok?
Than elevate him.
people still don't understand they don't need to elevate rookies?
because of the new rule all rookie listed players have been affectively auto promoted you will nominate your new 4 rookies once your list has 45 players
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 26, 2013, 05:25:30 PM
people still don't understand they don't need to elevate rookies?
because of the new rule all rookie listed players have been affectively auto promoted you will nominate your new 4 rookies once your list has 45 players
I know - i just like the whole elevation, makes it more like the AFL. They are picks I wasnt using anyway...
Plus now there is no need to wait once it gets to us.
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 26, 2013, 05:25:30 PM
people still don't understand they don't need to elevate rookies?
because of the new rule all rookie listed players have been affectively auto promoted you will nominate your new 4 rookies once your list has 45 players
The way I see it is this:
I needed 5 more Nat picks but there are obviously not enough players left in the pool.
Elevating Arnot and Crozier meant I only need 3 Nat picks.
Doing this leaves me with 3 rookie picks.
The remaining Nat picks I have to take to fill my senior list will be from the same pool of players as the rookie draft.
So basically, I get the better players that I want more in the rookie draft and then fill the vacant spots on my list with my subsidiary picks and then I can just nominate the rookies .
;)
Yep, like I said before, if you want to use rookie picks elevate, if you don't mind your NAT picks just use them in this case.
Someone like Matt Thomas or Nathan Batsanis could get rookie listed, I rather pick up somebody (or three now) of their quality than some guy from the pool of player made up of guys that a BXV club has delisted with leftover picks after the rookie draft.
Quote from: NigeyS on November 26, 2013, 05:34:20 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 26, 2013, 05:25:30 PM
people still don't understand they don't need to elevate rookies?
because of the new rule all rookie listed players have been affectively auto promoted you will nominate your new 4 rookies once your list has 45 players
The way I see it is this:
I needed 5 more Nat picks but there are obviously not enough players left in the pool.
Elevating Arnot and Crozier meant I only need 3 Nat picks.
Doing this leaves me with 3 rookie picks.
The remaining Nat picks I have to take to fill my senior list will be from the same pool of players as the rookie draft.
So basically, I get the better players that I want more in the rookie draft and then fill the vacant spots on my list with my subsidiary picks and then I can just nominate the rookies .
;)
but you don't need to elevate them to use your rookie picks as due to the new rules they are not rookies anymore
you just have to decide how you want to draft your 45 players either in this draft, the rookie draft or the left over draft or a combination of them all
and then you select which 4 players you want to be rookies
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 26, 2013, 05:45:25 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on November 26, 2013, 05:34:20 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 26, 2013, 05:25:30 PM
people still don't understand they don't need to elevate rookies?
because of the new rule all rookie listed players have been affectively auto promoted you will nominate your new 4 rookies once your list has 45 players
The way I see it is this:
I needed 5 more Nat picks but there are obviously not enough players left in the pool.
Elevating Arnot and Crozier meant I only need 3 Nat picks.
Doing this leaves me with 3 rookie picks.
The remaining Nat picks I have to take to fill my senior list will be from the same pool of players as the rookie draft.
So basically, I get the better players that I want more in the rookie draft and then fill the vacant spots on my list with my subsidiary picks and then I can just nominate the rookies .
;)
but you don't need to elevate them to use your rookie picks as due to the new rules they are not rookies anymore
you just have to decide how you want to draft your 45 players either in this draft, the rookie draft or the left over draft or a combination of them all
and then you select which 4 players you want to be rookies
Exactly... I know haha.
I rather split them. 3 rookie and 3 from the leftovers after all drafts. Hence my ultimate decision to elevate.
Wait so for example if I want to use rookie picks can I instead of taking a NAT pick, pass on that.
Then use one of those subisdary picks that will get my list to 41 from the extra pool.
So if you want use a pick from rookie draft but you have NAT picks, you just pass em?
Correct Vinny it's just how many players you have on your list doesn't matter which list they were on
And yeah you have to decide how to draft your remaining players
Then you nominate 4 new rookies can be anyone from your 45 players
Sweeet, cheers man.
We' pick this guy who came through the Breakers accedemy :o Welcome Jono Freeman :D
Quote from: nrich102 on November 26, 2013, 05:51:59 PM
We' pick this guy who came through the Breakers accedemy :o Welcome Jono Freeman :D
Didn't see it coming. :P
Nice!
So taking into account or the elevations people have decided to do, passing and stuff.
How many picks left and how many players left?
Would love it if someone could tell me. :)
Hence why I was questioning why people are still elevating rookies lol you may aswell just pass the pick
Bombers pick Orazio Fantasia
Being biased? Yes maybe lol
Quote from: vinny on November 26, 2013, 05:53:29 PM
Nice!
So taking into account or the elevations people have decided to do, passing and stuff.
How many picks left and how many players left?
Would love it if someone could tell me. :)
10 players left.
You'd need 6 more picks to be passed to be able to use #69.
I have been keeping the team lists up to date so you can check there. Once all players in national Draft have been taken we will have 3 rounds of rookie draft, regardless of whether you have 3 rookie picks or not, and then follow with supplementary picks which I will work out.
In my Breakers case we will only have one Rookie pick as we only have one vacancy left on our list to bring to 45.
Rookies to be nominated at conclusion of drafting.
Quote from: Ringo on November 26, 2013, 05:57:35 PM
I have been keeping the team lists up to date so you can check there. Once all players in national Draft have been taken we will have 3 rounds of rookie draft, regardless of whether you have 3 rookie picks or not, and then follow with supplementary picks which I will work out.
In my Breakers case we will only have one Rookie pick as we only have one vacancy left on our list to bring to 45.
Rookies to be nominated at conclusion of drafting.
Wouldn't it be fairest to have the supplementary picks taken in the same order as both the Nat and Rookie Drafts? ???
Quote from: NigeyS on November 26, 2013, 05:59:24 PM
Quote from: Ringo on November 26, 2013, 05:57:35 PM
I have been keeping the team lists up to date so you can check there. Once all players in national Draft have been taken we will have 3 rounds of rookie draft, regardless of whether you have 3 rookie picks or not, and then follow with supplementary picks which I will work out.
In my Breakers case we will only have one Rookie pick as we only have one vacancy left on our list to bring to 45.
Rookies to be nominated at conclusion of drafting.
Wouldn't it be fairest to have the supplementary picks taken in the same order as both the Nat and Rookie Drafts? ???
Random.org? :P
As I said in a previous post at the conclussion of the Rookie Draft 3 rounds we will revert to where we left off at the the National Draft and then if required further picks as per table order ascending. This is the same way as it is done in AFL no need for random org as it is based on finishing order. I expect only 5 teams requiring picks after the 3 rounds of the rookie drafts.
Alright no worries, one of those teams would be the Owls.
I need two NAT picks which I won't get and 2 rookie picks so four picks in total.
Which means after the three rookie draft rounds, I just need one more pick. :)
i'll need 3 extra picks i believe :'(
there are only expected to be about 35 players drafted tomorrow :-[
According to the team lists, 30 rookie picks need to be taken on top of those who are passing or not getting NAT picks so taking rookie ones to fill lists.
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 26, 2013, 06:49:30 PM
i'll need 3 extra picks i believe :'(
there are only expected to be about 35 players drafted tomorrow :-[
By my very rough calculations there should be enough players.
These late pick spuds we are getting may be players that we delist soon anyway, or hidden gems.
*Waits for Ele/Nige to mention Hutchings.* :P
Dylan Main
I dont know who any of these players are haha :P
Aliir Aliir
that was his mate?
i didn't know who it was lol
oh well he can trade me Barlow for him lol
It was only for picks away too. :-\
I am glad I passed.... would have taken him being a Swan!
Keen to be AXV in the rookie drafting, come on fellas :P
Both we and EXVs are now waiting on Torp. :P
Quote from: NigeyS on November 26, 2013, 07:54:17 PM
Both we and EXVs are now waiting on Torp. :P
;D ;D ;D
Ok I've read through the past page. Do we just keep drafting here and then in the rookie draft we take as many picks to take us to 45 players? (In my case I think this is 1 unless I pass here, making it 2. Ringo to confirm) Then we choose rookies after these 2 drafts? If so I Pass this pick.
Correct, Nails is up
oh i see it goes torp u torp nails haha my bad
Darcy Byrne-Jones
i assume Torp wants to pass again
Pass
IDK what to do... Looks like nobody worth picking in the rookie draft, who are you guys looking at?
I'm unsure whether to pass or to pick a guy I'm considering.
Ringo I have a couple guys on my list like Bradd Dalziell who I haven't delisted but is currently not on an AFL list. If he doesn't get picked up by a club, which draft can I take a pick in?
I'd like it to be the rookie, but I'm confused and don't think we'll know what happens with Dalziell until after?
IDK this is making me unsure whether to pass or pick. Sorry guys, need a bit of confirmation first.
If Dalziell doesnt get picked in the rookie/preseason draft you will get a compensation pick at the end of the rookie i believe.
Correct I think ^
Damn, would really, really want it to be at the start of the rookie.
What's the point of having a cake if I can't eat it? :'(
It's pick a kid now who nobody wants in any XVs comp who I think will turn out alright or take my #4 pick in the rookie draft...
Odds are I'm going to have to take 3 end of draft picks for players like Dalziell and Tambling.... and not get to use my #4 rookie pick.
Correct? fmbxvs
:'(
I quit
Lol jokes. But I am sad and I'll message Allir to not play this season :P
You will still get to use your first 3 round rookie picks before using compo picks, compo picks are just to get your list up to the right number.
You then name rookie listed players after the draft is finished at final list lodgement
Quote from: whatlez on November 26, 2013, 10:18:54 PM
Lol jokes. But I am sad and I'll message Allir to not play this season :P
Hahaha just tell him to not play, yeeeeeeeep.
Quote from: vinny on November 26, 2013, 10:20:16 PM
Quote from: whatlez on November 26, 2013, 10:18:54 PM
Lol jokes. But I am sad and I'll message Allir to not play this season :P
Hahaha just tell him to not play, yeeeeeeeep.
He won't get a game. It was more just for the team spirit...
Yeah I know, haha. I wanted Nathan Freeman (Goes to my school) or Mitch Honeychurch (Leaves near me & NIGE :o :P)
but none suited my team and I traded all my picks :(
would have done a deal with you after this season Lez but if your going to tell him not to play i might not :P
I'm joking kb. But it's very very unlikely he will play next year.
Quote from: whatlez on November 26, 2013, 10:32:19 PM
I'm joking kb. But it's very very unlikely he will play next year.
i know mate so was i hence the :P
i doubt anyone taken now will play next year
i'm sure we'll be able to work something out next pre season cant do it not cause out of movements lol
Do draft pick players count as movements?
This is so confusing lol. That is why I got rid of my draft picks, I don't like them. :P
Quote from: whatlez on November 26, 2013, 10:38:20 PM
Do draft pick players count as movements?
i think so but not sure
Quote from: vinny on November 26, 2013, 10:23:28 PM
Mitch Honeychurch (Leaves near me & NIGE :o :P)
:o This is news to me! Shall we go pay Mitch a visit?
Oh, and whose pick is it? ???
Quote from: NigeyS on November 26, 2013, 10:48:02 PM
Oh, and whose pick is it? ???
not sure if nails decided to pass or not ???
Quote from: whatlez on November 26, 2013, 10:21:29 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 26, 2013, 10:20:16 PM
Quote from: whatlez on November 26, 2013, 10:18:54 PM
Lol jokes. But I am sad and I'll message Allir to not play this season :P
Hahaha just tell him to not play, yeeeeeeeep.
He won't get a game. It was more just for the team spirit...
i wouldnt be so sure about that.... :-X
If you trade drafted players it will be classed as a player movement as they are moving from your club.
And Nails to confirm whether passing or not.
6 players left in the draft,
Quote from: SydneyRox on November 26, 2013, 11:00:06 PM
Quote from: whatlez on November 26, 2013, 10:21:29 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 26, 2013, 10:20:16 PM
Quote from: whatlez on November 26, 2013, 10:18:54 PM
Lol jokes. But I am sad and I'll message Allir to not play this season :P
Hahaha just tell him to not play, yeeeeeeeep.
He won't get a game. It was more just for the team spirit...
i wouldnt be so sure about that.... :-X
I hope he does!!
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on November 26, 2013, 10:19:23 PM
You will still get to use your first 3 round rookie picks before using compo picks, compo picks are just to get your list up to the right number.
You then name rookie listed players after the draft is finished at final list lodgement
Are you sure?
Is Dalziell etc. in the rookie draft or the preseason draft?
Will we know at the start of the rookie draft whether Dalziell/Tambling etc. are on playing lists?
It's just an issue of whether I get stuck with 3 retarded compo picks. I'll need to take compo picks if I can't take rookie picks and Dalziell/Tambo dissapear. Sorry guys, just trying to work this out. My bad.
Well, Bling has just retired so...
And I've heard zero talk of Dalziell being picked up.
:-X
yeah jbs is correct
Did Bling legit retire? Adelaide were saying they'd probs pick him up as a rookie in this draft
fmxvs
That's 4 XVs/XViiis teams I lose Bling in ::)
In that case I'll take this kid, I'm not sure why nobody wants him and I passed on a pick instead of taking this kid in another draft...
George Hewett
In SANFL U18s he averages 24 possies/game and 5 marks. and 16 possies/game at U18s. I realise Sydney is a shower club for him to get drafted to, but confused why nobody else is keen on him. Still a solid midfield prospect end of the day.
Bling was a gun and starred for Adelaide in the games he did play for them. flower this :( my heart is broken. Least I can take a rookie pick or more now.
yep Bling retired
i nearly took Hewett but needed defenders and forwards
Speck isn't online, but I have no idea who to pick... Any ideas?
Pass ;D
Quote from: whatlez on November 26, 2013, 11:20:47 PM
Speck isn't online, but I have no idea who to pick... Any ideas?
well this is different lol
don't think it makes a difference at this stage tbh
I'll go Jayden Hunt.
i messaged football factory
5 players left ;D
Quote from: NigeyS on November 26, 2013, 10:46:22 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 26, 2013, 10:23:28 PM
Mitch Honeychurch (Leaves near me & NIGE :o :P)
:o This is news to me! Shall we go pay Mitch a visit?
It's fairly close, he went to Vermont Secondary and I got mates who knew him.
Guess you could say Mitch and I are best mates ;)
I'd like to upgrade Will Langford to my senior list with my next pick, then skip the rest.
Once FF picks, we'll fly through the rest.
Quote from: NigeyS on November 27, 2013, 02:40:03 PM
Once FF picks, we'll fly through the rest.
Assuming he doesn't take our man our pick will be very quick :D
Quote from: Memphistopheles on November 27, 2013, 03:07:41 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on November 27, 2013, 02:40:03 PM
Once FF picks, we'll fly through the rest.
Assuming he doesn't take our man our pick will be very quick :D
You've had ages to decide on a back-up though? :P
Only 5 left, can't go too wrong. That said though, I know who I'd want and am surprised one of the guys left is actually still there.
We will use pick 107 to upgrade Josh Bruce to the senior list.
MISSING OUT BY ONE PICK. :(
sorry guys, will pick soon
It's cool if you wanna pass. :)
I want a pick ;D
Tom Langdon
damn :(
*Flips shower.*
Anybody messaged os and Memphis ?
Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on November 27, 2013, 05:06:47 PM
Tom Langdon
That was the guy we wanted. Clear #1 at this pick.
Now it's a toss up between a few guys.
I have a clear No.2
Quote from: NigeyS on November 27, 2013, 05:37:34 PM
I have a clear No.2
You should see a doctor. That Aint normal!! ;D
Maybe a little bias due to being an Eagles fan but out of the remaining guys I think he's best left.
With our last pick we'll grab Tom Barrass.
Supposed to be elite with his disposal, his player comparison is Harry Taylor and the clincher for me is that he is actually very smart (Scored 98+ TER) which is a big plus for me when drafting players.
I know it doesn't necessarily convert to footy smarts but in most cases it does and these kind of guys like the aforementioned Taylor can actually be very valuable in fantasy games even though they are KPP players.
I messaged spinking
Was going to just pick someone else (cant mention name) cos it was the easy option, thought i better have a look, good to hear i got the right man as i no nothing about any of these late picks.
Quote from: SydneyRox on November 27, 2013, 05:46:30 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on November 27, 2013, 05:37:34 PM
I have a clear No.2
You should see a doctor. That Aint normal!! ;D
pmsl
Somebody pass please :)
Quote from: vinny on November 27, 2013, 06:29:05 PM
Somebody pass please :)
I think Nigey passed something clear...
:( :P
3 players left.
I am a pick after that.
I will love you forever hahaha.
Quote from: Memphistopheles on November 27, 2013, 06:33:16 PM
Quote from: vinny on November 27, 2013, 06:29:05 PM
Somebody pass please :)
I think Nigey passed something clear...
No more jokes at my expense. >:(
Quote from: vinny on November 27, 2013, 06:33:31 PM
:( :P
3 players left.
I am a pick after that.
I will love you forever hahaha.
Is there a player you specifically want or... ?
With 4 picks in the rookie draft Vinny Think you will do better than the last National Draft pick.
Quote from: Ringo on November 27, 2013, 06:36:00 PM
With 4 picks in the rookie draft Vinny Think you will do better than the last National Draft pick.
I have to agree.
Nope Nige hahaha. Havent even thought about my pick for more than 5 minutes since Pick 5.
Yeah you might be right Ringo.
Quote from: vinny on November 27, 2013, 06:37:27 PM
Nope Nige hahaha. Havent even thought about my pick for more than 5 minutes since Pick 5.
Yeah you might be right Ringo.
Righto. I personally reckon you'd be better off not taking it. :P
Very happy to have picks 7, 14 and 16 in the rookie draft
Yeah, they're gonna be handy.
Having 1, 19 and 37 along with the three picks afterwards should be good considering the amount of players to pick from and the passes.
Falcons select:
Alex Pearce
Soo many choices
Guess il take Brady Grey
Do we automatically hand Karl Amon to FF? Or do we wait in case he wants to pass (he can do that, right?)?
Quote from: NigeyS on November 27, 2013, 07:52:36 PM
Do we automatically hand Karl Amon to FF? Or do we wait in case he wants to pass (he can do that, right?)?
yeah but then the next team gets him anyway
soooooo
can we start the rookie draft Ringo?
Thank God that Hostages is on... It's taking my mind off waiting to start the Rookie Draft. :P
Showeeeeeerrrrr, just realised Tim McIntyre got delisted.. :(
Does that mean I got to take another compensation pick Ringo?
Sorry, I didnt see it originally until I looked over delistings again for WXV.
Quote from: vinny on November 27, 2013, 09:00:29 PM
Showeeeeeerrrrr, just realised Tim McIntyre got delisted.. :(
Does that mean I got to take another compensation pick Ringo?
Sorry, I didnt see it originally until I looked over delistings again for WXV.
Yeah, you'll get one.
Sweeet, I'll take him off my list then.
Yeah surely we can use our rookie picks if we're players short on our list? I hope so anyway.
I think I should be able to take my rookie picks seeing as Bling and Dalziell are no longer on my list...
Check the rookie draft thread Nails and the draft list there. Have updated with all picks as they stand.
can i take my rookie picks earlier in the draft because i don't like where they are ?
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 28, 2013, 12:19:35 AM
can i take my rookie picks earlier in the draft because i don't like where they are ?
Lol wat?
We'd like to take our rookie picks earlier as well as we don't like where they are. Picks 1 and 2 will do thanks :P :D
Quote from: Memphistopheles on November 28, 2013, 12:50:02 AM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 28, 2013, 12:19:35 AM
can i take my rookie picks earlier in the draft because i don't like where they are ?
Lol wat?
We'd like to take our rookie picks earlier as well as we don't like where they are. Picks 1 and 2 will do thanks :P :D
think Colli is trolling Nails lol
not nails specifically - just thought i would try to annoy Ringo for sport :)
Nice try - Could have manipulated it so the Breakers have picks 1,2 and 3 but my consience got the better of me.
Quote from: Ringo on November 28, 2013, 09:15:08 AM
Nice try - Could have manipulated it so the Breakers have picks 1,2 and 3 but my consience got the better of me.
Should have :P
apparently it's my pick and i take ......Karl Amon
Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on November 28, 2013, 05:04:49 PM
apparently it's my pick and i take ......Karl Amon
Great pick!!!!!
Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on November 28, 2013, 05:04:49 PM
apparently it's my pick and i take ......Karl Amon
Must have been a tough choice. :o
Thanks gents, you know me and my knowledge on players, if i can help at all send me a pm ;D
National Draft now completed