FanFooty Forum

AFL fantasy competitions => Matchday => Matchday Archives => Topic started by: Justin Bieber on July 12, 2013, 10:10:26 PM

Title: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Justin Bieber on July 12, 2013, 10:10:26 PM
Port Adelaide were on fire knocking off Pies and Swans in consecutive weeks before falling to Bombers last week. Hawks lost against a much stronger Cats squad last week where they came to life in the 4th quarter but wasn't to be.

Who'll bounce back from their previous loss this week?
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: LF on July 13, 2013, 12:31:52 PM
#AFLPowerHawks - Buddy Franklin confirmed out. Replaced by Kyle Cheney. Subs: Jake Neade (@PAFC) & Jonathan Simpkin (@HawthornFC)
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: its me lads on July 13, 2013, 01:02:01 PM
^^Was always going to be the case.

I traded him out for Roughy so I hope he goes big  :D
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: BratPack on July 13, 2013, 01:03:37 PM
Quote from: its me lads on July 13, 2013, 01:02:01 PM
^^Was always going to be the case.

I traded him out for Roughy so I hope he goes big  :D

Couldn't afford Roughy...Went NRoo
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Bill Manspeaker on July 13, 2013, 01:07:17 PM
so Hombsch is definitely out?
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: BratPack on July 13, 2013, 01:19:58 PM
Quote from: brad on July 13, 2013, 01:07:17 PM
so Hombsch is definitely out?

yep
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Bill Manspeaker on July 13, 2013, 01:22:28 PM
eeeeexcellent ;D
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Mat0369 on July 13, 2013, 01:37:13 PM
Chief could be playing mind games, but he said Sewell might get a late late reprieve today.
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: essendon2 on July 13, 2013, 01:50:21 PM
only Hartlett for me in this one; would be happy with 85 8)
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: LF on July 13, 2013, 02:00:56 PM
Mitchell and now Lewis covering Stokes
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Spinking on July 13, 2013, 02:18:19 PM
Had Hartlett and Buddy, but now only one to worry about...  ::)
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Vinny on July 13, 2013, 02:55:52 PM
Have a donut for Buddy ! Daniher isn't getting games :(
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Hoggyz_a_legend on July 13, 2013, 02:56:16 PM
ROBBIE GRAY!!!!

And here I was thinking of trading him out after his 30~

2 tons in his last 3 and on 82 before half time!
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: its me lads on July 13, 2013, 03:02:21 PM
Played Terlich over Hartlett this week. Both on 17 but Terlich has time left.
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Jroo on July 13, 2013, 03:06:09 PM
Robbie Gray is somehow on 91 SuperCoach points at HT.  :o ???
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: roo boys! on July 13, 2013, 03:10:14 PM
Quote from: JROO8 on July 13, 2013, 03:06:09 PM
Robbie Gray is somehow on 91 SuperCoach points at HT.  :o ???
Took all of Hartlett's ::)
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Kellogscrunchynut on July 13, 2013, 03:19:00 PM
Have I missed a rule change? what is the concussion sub?
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: its me lads on July 13, 2013, 03:31:28 PM
Wow Stratton got cleaned up, groggy as anything.

Kellogs the concussion sub means when someone is thought to be concussed they come off and get assessed to see whether or not they can continue, the doctors have 20 minutes to make that decision, while the asses the player the sub can come on then either stay on or put the green vest back on depending on if the other player is concussed or not.
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Vinny on July 13, 2013, 03:45:06 PM
It's the Robbie Gray Show at AAMI !
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Bones Bombers on July 13, 2013, 03:51:39 PM
Is there a facebook page to contact the Channel 7 commentary team? I don't have twitter and I want to tell them how shower they are at their job. They couldn't understand how Stratton got a free when it was in the back, they said it should have been holding the ball. Bloody idiots!
It's not only this game though, I've been wanting to tell them plenty of times.


Haha just re-read my post and noticed I wrote shower without realising it. This site has me brainwashed!
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Master Q on July 13, 2013, 04:30:30 PM
Mitchell!  >:(
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: its me lads on July 13, 2013, 04:32:04 PM
Played Terlich over Hartlett. Hartlett finished with 43,hopefully Terlich beats it.
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: LF on July 13, 2013, 04:34:13 PM
Quote from: Master Q on July 13, 2013, 04:30:30 PM
Mitchell!  >:(

+1

Lewis covering Stokes ;D
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: Vinny on July 13, 2013, 04:49:33 PM
I like how Gunston goes about his game ! Quality player.
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: essendon2 on July 13, 2013, 04:58:52 PM
Hartlett --> Ibbotson/Shaw next week
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: PowerBug on July 13, 2013, 06:32:51 PM
I saw the last quarter, the only thing that pissed me off was after the match, when the commentators were going on about the spread of goalkickers. They didn't stop mentioning it, saying how good it was for Hawthorn to have everyone kicking goals. They had 4 players kick 16 of their 19 goals, and 7 goalkickers all up.... ::)


THey were too classy.
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: JBs-Hawks on July 13, 2013, 07:34:54 PM
Quote from: PowerBug on July 13, 2013, 06:32:51 PM
I saw the last quarter, the only thing that pissed me off was after the match, when the commentators were going on about the spread of goalkickers. They didn't stop mentioning it, saying how good it was for Hawthorn to have everyone kicking goals. They had 4 players kick 16 of their 19 goals, and 7 goalkickers all up.... ::)


THey were too classy.

Woulda thought your team getting demolished woulda pissed you off more
Title: Re: Port Adelaide Vs Hawthorn, Round 16, 2013
Post by: PowerBug on July 13, 2013, 07:39:21 PM
Well, is demolished the right word? I didn't see the majority of the game. It's not like i expected them to win this week, if they did i'd have been hugely impressed. ;)