Round # 12: 14th June 2013
(6th) GAZELLES (1137)
v (1569)
BEARS (5th)
(9th)
ALES (1646)
v (1413) HEAD HUNTERS (4th)
(16th) ESKIMOS (1494)
v (1227)
LAMBS (3rd)
(15th) LLAMAS (1562)
v (1608)
DONGS (10th)
(12th)
CRABS (1409)
v (1565) VIPERS (13th)
(14th) CROCODILES (1449)
v (1800)
DOLPHINS (1st)
(7th)
STRIKERS (1551)
v (1550) ELEPHANTS (11th)
(2nd)
FOLDERS (2014)
v (1794) TIGERS (8th)
Favourites listed after 12 coaches votes.
1 player short this week. :(
Got 7 or 8 defenders named this week... can only field 4... got only 2 forwards named... :'(
Can I just my emg's in positions just because i have 3 OOP and i have more players who can be selected... :(
Yeh u just name ur players OOP and u get half their score, and then can still name emergencies..
I think thats the answer u wanted..? :-\
Yeah I saw it... Kept Billy Longer in the rucks just incase of late out... then chucked Whitfled in the forward line. Left the other forward spot for the 3 defender emgs
So 3 emgs will cover 2 spots. 3 OOP is probably worse than 1 less :( lol.
We'll be a player short this week as well unless Jarryd Lyons comes in for a late change for the crows... Beats me why he's not playing, better player than half the cows last week...
Will be closer than we'd have liked vs the Eskimos but hopefully we'll get the job done.
Quote from: monstrum on June 13, 2013, 07:38:34 PM
Yeh u just name ur players OOP and u get half their score, and then can still name emergencies..
I think thats the answer u wanted..? :-\
This rule has never been decided upon - I am not going to put it to a vote i am just going to make a call and I will PM all coached.
I will be nice and honest ( instead of keeping the hint to myself).
Point A) - If you have a position ( example FWD) where you do not have enough players to field say one missing.
You can choose to name a mid or defender there ( ONLY IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A PLAYING FWD - NO MATTER HOW BAD).
This player named out of position will score 50% of his score same as an emerency covering a player in a position other than his.
Point B) - You can also choose to leave the spa BLANK - (name no one) - what this does is mean you will get your HIGHEST SCORING EMERGENCY players score for out of position at 50%.
It is up to you which option you choose.
Obviously if you only have one player out you are much better off leaving the slot blank and taking your best of the three emergencies scores for the out of position emergency cover score.
However if you have 3 or 4 players out and some risky players named, you will probably want as many emergencies named as possible to use in case you need them - so in this instance you are better off naming players (OUT OF POSITION) which in turn allows you to still name more as emergencies to cover the risky players you may have had to name.
JUST REMEMBER - IF YOU HAVE ANY PLAYER PLAYING IN HIS POSITION - YOU MUST NAME HIM OVER ANY OUT OF POSITION PLAYER - AND YOU CANNOT LEAVE THE SLOT BLANK EITHER IF YOU HAVE ANY PLAYING PLAYER IN THAT POSITION.
Any questions ask me so we are all clear on this ruling.
8 fowards and 8 defenders playing :P
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on June 13, 2013, 09:24:14 PM
8 fowards and 8 defenders playing :P
I have 3 forwards - 1 ruck - 7 mids - 7 defenders.
gone for the option of naming nahas ( effectively leaving my FWD 4 slot empty) and named a mid and 2 def on my emergencies who will cover him.
i named nahas there as he is an emergency and may be a late in....
I need more forwards at trade time that is for sure.
at least these byes teach us a bit about our lists :)
a note on the PM i sent you all regarding naming of teams and OOP players.
it is not a vote, or a choice of option a or option b - it is point a and point b - both are the case. You do what is best for your team on any given week.
the only rule is that you cannot name an OOP player or leave a slot blank if you have ANY playing player on your list for that position (senior listed or promoted to senior list player that is)
make sense?
flower the byes :'(
Quote from: Ricochet on June 14, 2013, 12:57:10 PM
flower the byes :'(
We've got a nice full team to play against you :D
Quote from: Ricochet on June 14, 2013, 02:14:14 PM
Quote from: Memphistopheles on June 14, 2013, 01:55:53 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 14, 2013, 12:57:10 PM
flower the byes :'(
We've got a nice full team to play against you :D
have you seen mine?
Yeah mate, unlucky. If it was allowed I'd donate you some of my non-starting guys to make it a fairer match.
Geez Colli, l think your Vipers are favourites over my Crabs mate........your team looks pretty good this week, and l am 2 short with no emergencies
Quote from: nostradamus on June 14, 2013, 07:06:15 PM
Geez Colli, l think your Vipers are favourites over my Crabs mate........your team looks pretty good this week, and l am 2 short with no emergencies
Wish I was versing you this week >:(
Quote from: nostradamus on June 14, 2013, 07:06:15 PM
Geez Colli, l think your Vipers are favourites over my Crabs mate........your team looks pretty good this week, and l am 2 short with no emergencies
a lot comes down to captains, mine are average at best.
Lucas just named sub... a fwd short (nahas probably wont play - named emergency)....
lots of holes in my line up and you are at home, the VAST majority of coaches who voted (12) backed the Crabs in - disloyal ;D
good luck, should be a good match up, melksham prone to being the sub also and plenty of giants in my line up, we will see.
GO LEVI GO
#CasboultForPM
Could the Lambs be caught this week smiling at the Crocodiles?
It'd appear so after Murphy just got crocodile rolled out of the game.
Quote from: Nails on June 14, 2013, 08:55:03 PM
Could the Lambs be caught this week smiling at the Crocodiles?
It'd appear so after Murphy just got crocodile rolled out of the game.
haha that's funny... But the Crocs are playing like 13 lol and I wish I was versing these Lambs this week >:(
Kade and Casboult doing their best to put the Elephants away early.
I reckon the Dongs will be rolled by the Llama this week
Our players are playing like dicks.
flower that. >:(
Well, Lake did ok. And the Eskimos are nothing flash so far this season so hopefully we'll be ok
Pun would've been funny if we were playing the Crocs Nails ;D ::)
Dunno where the flower I was looking
swear you were playing the dickodiles.
Haha nope the Eskis, without our own Eski. :'(
Ding dong the dongs are dead
Which old dong?
Every single flowering one of these useless good for nothing cow dongs.
My Dusty Martin for Mitch Robinson trade looks worse every week. ::)
Pretty average night in general. Robbo very disapointing after his first quarter, Walker average, happy with VC Mitchell though.
Gibbsy :)
ill update scores this morning some time
45/4 ......must be a record 8)
Joe Daniher ;D ;D ;D
.....what a great first half, think we might have this weeks rising star nomination
Think you might be on to something there :P
Just you all wait till Crozier gets a full game, then Mongolia will have our nomination. :)
Crameri's second half :o. From 20 to over a ton in DT :)
Quote from: nostradamus on June 15, 2013, 08:35:42 PM
45/4 ......must be a record 8)
included your 2 DNP :) it's all up from here for you. the rest of your team has been in great form recently....
Did you notice that we have a couple OOP Colli? I didn't list them when submitting team
How are you going Eskimos? Might be tight, kind of counting myself lucky Cotchin wasn't great today after Murphy was sent to the cleaners :-X
Day was good... and Harwood 110 that will halved ;D
He might find himself in the senior side ;D
updating scores now for last couple of games...
Get around Travy Boak. Should of skipped him :(
Business as usual for the Dolphins.
One spud in Aaron Edwards with the Porpoise on the bench but no trouble from the Crocodiles this week despite a good VC and probably a good C score for them.
game centre finally all up to date. some close ones, some upsets, some predictable ones....
someone forgot to tell a few teams you are supposed to suck during the byes....
Umm so I think we are in big trouble against the Eskimos :o
931 + Cooney + Giles + Logan
969 + Morris + Ebert x 1.5 + Jones + Neade + Picken + HGA
Llamas looking good..... again.....
Folders will defiantly beat us especially how that Cloke and Swan are on fire :-\
At least it's good for my SC :P
Sidey slow down with Elliot and Goodes
What cost me this week would be Matty White as sub and no ruckman and 2 less forwards :(
Would of been a good week if I avoid that :(
JUST REALISED THAT I FORGOT ABOUT DYLAN SHIEL!??!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
flowering kick some goals Sidey!
Finally, 10 bloody rounds of torture, but we have another win!
Was tossing up between Westhoff and Scully for VC... Made the wrong choice.
Westhoff, why you so bad?
Quote from: Jayman on June 16, 2013, 06:29:36 PM
Was tossing up between Westhoff and Scully for VC... Made the wrong choice.
Westhoff, why you so bad?
I was tossing up between Boak and Redden. Boak almost beat Redden with his 1.5x
Also Dylan Shiel over Matt White has cost me 48 >:(
Quote from: whatlez on June 16, 2013, 06:31:38 PM
Quote from: Jayman on June 16, 2013, 06:29:36 PM
Was tossing up between Westhoff and Scully for VC... Made the wrong choice.
Westhoff, why you so bad?
I was tossing up between Boak and Redden. Boak almost beat Redden with his 1.5x
Also Dylan Shiel over Matt White has cost me 48 >:(
Scully DID beat Westhoff's score x 1.5.
Not happy >:( I need that 3rd premium scorer...
Quote from: KoopKicka on June 16, 2013, 06:26:49 PM
Finally, 10 bloody rounds of torture, but we have another win!
Count yourself very lucky Koop. ;)
Going to be close beatween myself and Jay. Sidey did bad for skip and Elliot went alright. Will be really really close. Not playing Shiel or even as emg might cost me around 40 points and the game :(
might want to check the scores, strikers over elephants by........ 1 point :-X
Quote from: Colliwobblers on June 16, 2013, 07:57:52 PM
might want to check the scores, strikers over elephants by........ 1 point :-X
holy flowering shower
double checked my totals all correct, so unless i got a player wrong which is unlikely this is the final result....
now we can say we have the closest game of the season and unlikely we will ever see one closer.
Quote from: Jayman on June 16, 2013, 08:02:14 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on June 16, 2013, 07:57:52 PM
might want to check the scores, strikers over elephants by........ 1 point :-X
holy flowering shower
That you on the loo this morning after a bad curry?
Quote from: Colliwobblers on June 16, 2013, 08:10:24 PM
double checked my totals all correct, so unless i got a player wrong which is unlikely this is the final result....
now we can say we have the closest game of the season and unlikely we will ever see one closer.
you do know that now you've said it that we'll end-up with a half point margin
#murphyslaw
That's Bullshower. I had Shiel and forgot to play him >:(
Quote from: whatlez on June 16, 2013, 08:29:11 PM
That's Bullshower. I had Shiel and forgot to play him >:(
In some cases I was lucky, in some cases you were.
I was lucky Hoskin-Elliot was a late inclusion - would have lost otherwise!
But I was unlucky that I almost submitted my team with Scully as VC, but changed it to Hoff.
all scores updated, ladder to come.
What a round for the Folders. Scoring well over 2000 with 2 players OOP and Black being the sub :o
I cant get over 1 point margin lol.
Quote from: Jayman on June 16, 2013, 09:15:35 PM
I cant get over 1 point margin lol.
a draw would have been fitting and who would have ever thought a draw would happen in this scoring system.....
great match.
Quote from: Jayman on June 16, 2013, 08:35:29 PM
Quote from: whatlez on June 16, 2013, 08:29:11 PM
That's Bullshower. I had Shiel and forgot to play him >:(
In some cases I was lucky, in some cases you were.
I was lucky Hoskin-Elliot was a late inclusion - would have lost otherwise!
But I was unlucky that I almost submitted my team with Scully as VC, but changed it to Hoff.
Not taking anything away from you... but I deserved to win lol. Forgot Shiel, didn't VC Boak or even skip him. Yeah Hoskin-Elliott in was just unfair :( and HGA saved you the win.
;D
Okay I saw this before... But I lost... You double counted Harwood's 110 into 55 due to OOP
So because you did it twice... the other DNP should get Wilko's 38 so 19. :) but :'(
round 12 ladder up