FanFooty Forum

FanFooty => Supercoach Archive => Archives => 2013 SC Player Archive => Topic started by: sammy123 on February 20, 2013, 04:15:07 PM

Title: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: sammy123 on February 20, 2013, 04:15:07 PM
I have both in my FWD line. Too risky or a good move?
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: colmullet on February 20, 2013, 04:19:38 PM
Could be the Sidey and Danger combo of 2013......yeah there's risk but i think at worst they will average 85 - 90 which isn't the end of the world
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: sammy123 on February 20, 2013, 05:04:36 PM
thanks colmullet
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: quinny88 on February 20, 2013, 06:22:25 PM
Quote from: colmullet on February 20, 2013, 04:19:38 PM
Could be the Sidey and Danger combo of 2013......yeah there's risk but i think at worst they will average 85 - 90 which isn't the end of the world

Not the end of the world but pretty bad considering there are only 6 fwd spots to fill in 2013. Cant afford to have 2 guys avg bellow 95 and definitely not below 90. Extra trades may make that not too much of an issue anyway though but these guys arent picked as cash cows so you really would be taking a risk getting both in the hope they will both be keepers.
Would be a great move if they both averaged 100 though
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: Ricochet on February 20, 2013, 06:42:15 PM
Yeh personally i can't see Wright going 105+ which he would need to achieve to be a top 10 fwd.
Martin might just do it.
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: tbagrocks on February 20, 2013, 09:04:22 PM
Martin is still a risk yep surely? Matty not so much, he's a lad who has big upside and will improve
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: sammy123 on February 20, 2013, 10:38:48 PM
hopefully the stories about dusty building his tank are true
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: TheAnt on February 20, 2013, 11:05:54 PM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 20, 2013, 09:04:22 PM
Martin is still a risk yep surely? Matty not so much, he's a lad who has big upside and will improve
Martin does aswell...that's the whole point of this thread.
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: SydneyRox on February 21, 2013, 01:41:12 AM
both is a risk as richo has said, pick one and go for it
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: quinny88 on February 21, 2013, 01:46:35 AM
Quote from: sammy123 on February 20, 2013, 10:38:48 PM
hopefully the stories about dusty building his tank are true

They are. He is top 5 in all time trails. Having a monster pre season
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: tbagrocks on February 21, 2013, 02:05:11 AM
Helped by a SJ and Nic omitions from round one. A Walker, Rocky, Wright, Dusty starting four seems totally feasible now, depends where I want Cox
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: sammy123 on February 21, 2013, 10:42:11 AM
thoughts on bartel????
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: t.thomas6 on February 21, 2013, 11:07:07 AM
Matty de Boer? Getting much mroe midfield time and with an average of 85 last season spent a fair bit in the FWD line...i can only see that going up since he is one of Ross' loved ones haha
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: CrowsFan on February 21, 2013, 12:15:51 PM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 21, 2013, 02:05:11 AM
Helped by a SJ and Nic omitions from round one. A Walker, Rocky, Wright, Dusty starting four seems totally feasible now, depends where I want Cox
In and around your mouth? :P
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: quinny88 on February 21, 2013, 12:16:07 PM
Quote from: sammy123 on February 21, 2013, 10:42:11 AM
thoughts on bartel????

Potential upgrade target for mine. Don't see a big upside to him so he won't have a big price rise or anything
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: quinny88 on February 21, 2013, 12:16:47 PM
Quote from: CrowsFan on February 21, 2013, 12:15:51 PM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 21, 2013, 02:05:11 AM
Helped by a SJ and Nic omitions from round one. A Walker, Rocky, Wright, Dusty starting four seems totally feasible now, depends where I want Cox
In and around your mouth? :P

Hahaha oh wow..
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: Ricochet on February 21, 2013, 01:05:51 PM
Quote from: CrowsFan on February 21, 2013, 12:15:51 PM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 21, 2013, 02:05:11 AM
Helped by a SJ and Nic omitions from round one. A Walker, Rocky, Wright, Dusty starting four seems totally feasible now, depends where I want Cox
In and around your mouth? :P
haha yep he just went there.
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: BoredSaint on February 21, 2013, 02:25:33 PM
I'm putting in Wright. I got that feeling its the Wright year to have him in your team :P
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: sammy123 on February 21, 2013, 02:52:30 PM
Quote from: BoredSaint on February 21, 2013, 02:25:33 PM
I'm putting in Wright. I got that feeling its the Wright year to have him in your team :P

settle down wright now
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: cortez on February 21, 2013, 03:41:33 PM
Quote from: sammy123 on February 21, 2013, 10:42:11 AM
thoughts on bartel????

With Stevie out round 1 he will play mids, score 130 and Geelong get win number 10 in a row against Hawthorn. But after that I dont know how he will go up forward, should still avg 90+
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: Footyrulz on February 21, 2013, 08:37:04 PM
i don't see why not. both very good breakout contenders.
Title: Re: Martin and Wright risky?
Post by: Torress on February 22, 2013, 03:12:17 PM
im going to run  with martin I think this year. he just had too many games last year where he looked like he might go huge - then did nothing in the 2nd halves; perhaps a big preseason and he gets more outside ball and goes BANG.
can't see him decreasing his average, and has obvious upside.

i like wright too - but personally i don't think he'll have the role to go BANG - potential yes.

ppl saying here they won't go stevie J is music to my ears - the suspension makes him a good POD now.  8) 8)