FanFooty Forum

FanFooty => Real Dream Team Archive => Archives => 2013 DT Player Archive => Topic started by: The F.A.R.K. on February 06, 2013, 03:14:02 AM

Title: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: The F.A.R.K. on February 06, 2013, 03:14:02 AM
What are your guys thoughts

I reckon Siposs has potential to ave 85-90 but doesnt have js of byrnes

Byrnes is also 100k cheaper
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: Jukes on February 06, 2013, 03:20:04 AM
I reckon over the course of the season Byrnes will average a bit more, but Sipposs has a very nice start (GC, Richmond, GWS) and should put on a load of money early and then be straight-swapped to an under-performing premium.

I'm 50/50 between them which is better, leaning towards Byrnes, not going with either though. 5 premo and 3 rook forward line.
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: The F.A.R.K. on February 06, 2013, 03:36:27 AM
Quote from: Jukes on February 06, 2013, 03:20:04 AM
I reckon over the course of the season Byrnes will average a bit more, but Sipposs has a very nice start (GC, Richmond, GWS) and should put on a load of money early and then be straight-swapped to an under-performing premium.

I'm 50/50 between them which is better, leaning towards Byrnes, not going with either though. 5 premo and 3 rook forward line.

Okay youve just locked siposs in. By round 6/7 siposs will be straight swap if not downgrade to daisy who will be back from injury
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:40:13 AM
Expect some early vests from Daisy too so he should be nice a juicy at ~380k
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: The F.A.R.K. on February 06, 2013, 03:42:05 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:40:13 AM
Expect some early vests from Daisy too so he should be nice a juicy at ~380k

Yeah reckon round 6-8 siposs will be more expensive than daisy
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:43:39 AM
Nope! But if after two great rounds either score like a star then maybe a trade before round three, even round four if it warrents

You'd be crazy to start either unless you know how well they're going and wand to back your judgement
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:44:53 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:43:39 AM
Nope! But if after two great rounds either score like a star then maybe a trade before round three, even round four if it warrents

You'd be crazy to start either unless you know how well they're going and wand to back your judgement

Not starting Byrnes mate? He's one of the more popular mid-prce fwds so its not unreasonable ;)
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:50:41 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:44:53 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:43:39 AM
Nope! But if after two great rounds either score like a star then maybe a trade before round three, even round four if it warrents

You'd be crazy to start either unless you know how well they're going and wand to back your judgement

Not starting Byrnes mate? He's one of the more popular mid-prce fwds so its not unreasonable ;)
Unlike Abramovich I know when a player might be passed it :o
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: The F.A.R.K. on February 06, 2013, 03:52:06 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:44:53 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:43:39 AM
Nope! But if after two great rounds either score like a star then maybe a trade before round three, even round four if it warrents

You'd be crazy to start either unless you know how well they're going and wand to back your judgement

Not starting Byrnes mate? He's one of the more popular mid-prce fwds so its not unreasonable ;)

I reckon Byrnes will be an Andy Krakouer revive your career sorta story at melb but his rollercoaster scores means he isnt a keeper. Byrnes has stepped up and is mentoring younger players and has fitted in really well
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:53:56 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:50:41 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:44:53 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:43:39 AM
Nope! But if after two great rounds either score like a star then maybe a trade before round three, even round four if it warrents

You'd be crazy to start either unless you know how well they're going and wand to back your judgement

Not starting Byrnes mate? He's one of the more popular mid-prce fwds so its not unreasonable ;)
Unlike Abramovich I know when a player might be passed it :o

Lamps is far from past it mate ;)
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: Adamant on February 06, 2013, 03:55:11 AM
Byrnes for sure.

Much cheaper and will probably average more.
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 04:32:28 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:53:56 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:50:41 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:44:53 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:43:39 AM
Nope! But if after two great rounds either score like a star then maybe a trade before round three, even round four if it warrents

You'd be crazy to start either unless you know how well they're going and wand to back your judgement

Not starting Byrnes mate? He's one of the more popular mid-prce fwds so its not unreasonable ;)
Unlike Abramovich I know when a player might be passed it :o

Lamps is far from past it mate ;)
Yeah but the difference is everyone in the Universe wants to keep the one the only the great Frank Lampard, but he wasn't bought in so he doesn't count

Think Shevchenko, Ballack, Veron, Torres, Makelele, Anelka, Crespo, all these guys in their prime would be great ;D but ...  ???

Anyway i'm not starting Byrens
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: Presto on February 06, 2013, 04:41:56 AM
Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on February 06, 2013, 03:52:06 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:44:53 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:43:39 AM
Nope! But if after two great rounds either score like a star then maybe a trade before round three, even round four if it warrents

You'd be crazy to start either unless you know how well they're going and wand to back your judgement

Not starting Byrnes mate? He's one of the more popular mid-prce fwds so its not unreasonable ;)

I reckon Byrnes will be an Andy Krakouer revive your career sorta story at melb but his rollercoaster scores means he isnt a keeper. Byrnes has stepped up and is mentoring younger players and has fitted in really well
Siposs, provided that he can stay away from the vest: if you take away the 4 games where he was a sub, he scored an average of 80, with two centuries and he is only 20.
Byrnes as someone said he is past it, mentoring young players does not score DT points.
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: elephants on February 06, 2013, 05:36:08 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 04:32:28 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:53:56 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:50:41 AM
Quote from: elephants on February 06, 2013, 03:44:53 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on February 06, 2013, 03:43:39 AM
Nope! But if after two great rounds either score like a star then maybe a trade before round three, even round four if it warrents

You'd be crazy to start either unless you know how well they're going and wand to back your judgement

Not starting Byrnes mate? He's one of the more popular mid-prce fwds so its not unreasonable ;)
Unlike Abramovich I know when a player might be passed it :o

Lamps is far from past it mate ;)
Yeah but the difference is everyone in the Universe wants to keep the one the only the great Frank Lampard, but he wasn't bought in so he doesn't count

Think Shevchenko, Ballack, Veron, Torres, Makelele, Anelka, Crespo, all these guys in their prime would be great ;D but ...  ???

Anyway i'm not starting Byrens

Okay, I'm with ya on the CFC bit. Can't say I'm off Byrnes... Yet ;)
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: Hagebear on February 06, 2013, 10:43:50 AM
Siposs looks the goods but is still very unproven. The fact that Byrnes has such good JS and is 100k cheaper makes it hard to go past him.
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: T Dog on February 06, 2013, 12:28:05 PM
my issue isn't Byrnes vs Siposs/mid pricer but Byrnes vs Rookie
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: mdub on February 06, 2013, 12:56:24 PM
Could sippos have the chance to be goddards replacement?
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: Jukes on February 06, 2013, 02:08:30 PM
Quote from: mdub on February 06, 2013, 12:56:24 PM
Could sippos have the chance to be goddards replacement?

I rate this as a very decent possibility.
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: mdub on February 06, 2013, 04:17:26 PM
Quote from: Jukes on February 06, 2013, 02:08:30 PM
Quote from: mdub on February 06, 2013, 12:56:24 PM
Could sippos have the chance to be goddards replacement?

I rate this as a very decent possibility.
yeah saints really rate siposs!
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: Justin Bieber on February 06, 2013, 06:15:49 PM
Sipooss, Byrnes.

Jokers.
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: auscoyote on February 06, 2013, 06:16:52 PM
Quote from: mdub on February 06, 2013, 04:17:26 PM
Quote from: Jukes on February 06, 2013, 02:08:30 PM
Quote from: mdub on February 06, 2013, 12:56:24 PM
Could sippos have the chance to be goddards replacement?

I rate this as a very decent possibility.
yeah saints really rate siposs!
SSSSHHHH people, he's my smokey ;)
Title: Re: Byrnes v Siposd
Post by: mdub on February 06, 2013, 09:43:35 PM
Quote from: whatlez on February 06, 2013, 06:15:49 PM
Sipooss, Byrnes.

Jokers.
Ha byrnes joker. Siposs GUN!