If its true what we hear he will be ruck/def dpp.
Who will join me with the PedoBurger combo?
Your Thoughts !
bit hard to believe that one i'll wait for confirmation
Quote from: greenmoon on December 12, 2012, 04:55:13 PM
If its true what we hear he will be ruck/def dpp.
Who will join me with the PedoBurger combo?
Your Thoughts !
Its been confirmed ;) Source DrDT twitter
wow that's interesting
maybe a D6 but not a R2!
R3 maybe
H.bennell mid only aswell :(
Quote from: KoopKicka on December 12, 2012, 04:57:47 PM
Quote from: greenmoon on December 12, 2012, 04:55:13 PM
If its true what we hear he will be ruck/def dpp.
Who will join me with the PedoBurger combo?
Your Thoughts !
Its been confirmed ;) Source DrDT twitter
(http://i46.tinypic.com/bfmgq1.jpg)
Quote from: greenmoon on December 12, 2012, 04:55:13 PM
If its true what we hear he will be ruck/def dpp.
Who will join me with the PedoBurger combo?
Your Thoughts !
Yep Dr.DreamTeam told me :o
Quote from: JROO8 on December 12, 2012, 05:33:06 PM
Quote from: greenmoon on December 12, 2012, 04:55:13 PM
If its true what we hear he will be ruck/def dpp.
Who will join me with the PedoBurger combo?
Your Thoughts !
Yep Dr.DreamTeam told me :o
;)
This interests me.
Hmm either pederson/lever combo, or sinclair/ cox.. or roughead.
Lever, whoever you are and whoever you play for... you just made the cut, for now.
Only problem is that if Pedo doesn't prove to be a keeper, you'd be stuck with lever still haha
Pedo will start in my backline no matter what if named round 1.
Originally i was going to play nic nat up front and have a non playing F/R to allow nic nat to cover the rucks and to use the VC loophole and emergency loophole.
May choose not to waste a forward spot on Nic Nat and just pick up lever in the ruck line. or even if maybee a F/R and R/B ruck bench could be the way to go at some stage.
It also gives you that option say grundy goes up to 200k you could always downgrade/upgrade him to a back and swithc pedo as your cover.
For me he is always going to be upgraded so DPP makes little difference
The choice becomes do you want to start with Goldstein in the rucks and pedo down back, or Broughts down back and pedo in the ruck. having a quick think about it i'd actually rather start broughts, goldy is no certainty to bounce back above 90 because he didn't score that great last year even when hmac wasn't playing. I think broughts on the other hand should definitely push a 90+ average and be a top 6 back, don't see goldy being a top 2 ruckman. Add to this the fact there seem to be a number of solid rookies down back, Vlastuin, Staker, Pittard, Colquhoun, Terlich, Doherty, Stevenson?, Heath
maybe cox up front, rowe/grundy in a ruck bench spot, lever in the other and pedo down back? :P
I will be using the F/R link not the B/R link... Pederson might become a backline keeper :)
How much is Pederson priced? Sorry for inconvence :)
Quote from: whatlez on December 12, 2012, 08:04:33 PM
How much is Pederson priced? Sorry for inconvence :)
$207,100
Quote from: Ziplock on December 12, 2012, 07:37:17 PM
maybe cox up front, rowe/grundy in a ruck bench spot, lever in the other and pedo down back? :P
Why would anyone consider Lever? no one knows a thing about him. Not every DPP needs to be paired up.
With lack of round 1 starting rookie rucks (bold prediction, I know), Pedo may be worth starting ruck bench to ensure you start with a full squad of starting players.
Quote from: timmyparso on December 12, 2012, 11:06:21 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on December 12, 2012, 07:37:17 PM
maybe cox up front, rowe/grundy in a ruck bench spot, lever in the other and pedo down back? :P
Why would anyone consider Lever? no one knows a thing about him. Not every DPP needs to be paired up.
With lack of round 1 starting rookie rucks (bold prediction, I know), Pedo may be worth starting ruck bench to ensure you start with a full squad of starting players.
The point of Lever is to expose the new rules.
[/quote]
The point of Lever is to expose the new rules.
[/quote]
A player that doesn't play is worthless regardless of rules
Quote from: timmyparso on December 12, 2012, 11:22:09 PM
The point of Lever is to expose the new rules.
[/quote]
A player that doesn't play is worthless regardless of rules
[/quote]
No necessarily J.Tippett is a perfect example of a non playing player that was very useful.
By exposing the new rules, i presume Lez means that with Lever it offers us another way of using the bench loophole and captaincy loop hole.
Quote from: MTTY on December 12, 2012, 11:36:18 PM
Quote from: timmyparso on December 12, 2012, 11:22:09 PM
The point of Lever is to expose the new rules.
A player that doesn't play is worthless regardless of rules
[/quote]
No necessarily J.Tippett is a perfect example of a non playing player that was very useful.
By exposing the new rules, i presume Lez means that with Lever it offers us another way of using the bench loophole and captaincy loop hole.
[/quote]
Correct. Being able to put Lever on bench or on field depending on situation could be valuable. Swapping with Pedo. Doing this in the forwardline too could be handy. Probably more effective, but more options.
Quote from: Holzman on December 12, 2012, 06:02:03 PM
Pedo will start in my backline no matter what if named round 1.
Originally i was going to play nic nat up front and have a non playing F/R to allow nic nat to cover the rucks and to use the VC loophole and emergency loophole.
May choose not to waste a forward spot on Nic Nat and just pick up lever in the ruck line. or even if maybee a F/R and R/B ruck bench could be the way to go at some stage.
It also gives you that option say grundy goes up to 200k you could always downgrade/upgrade him to a back and swithc pedo as your cover.
Interesting analysis, but I'm not sure about Lever - I don't want to have him clogging up a spot all year, though it could be useful to be able to swing Pedersen from ruck to defence later in the year.
IMO Tippet was only useful in 2011 when there was rolling byes through the whole season and most used him with Petrie whom turned out to be a premium. This year and next there is 3 bye rounds where it must be all hands on deck during 11-13 so a non playing player even if a DPP is a risk of a donut, even in the ruck.
On a different tangent..how about making him R3 with Big Luey and your favorite R1. Then no need for any DPP considerations at all. Perm emergency especially for Luey and only $207k. Frees you up to maximise your forward guns for the cost of a back rookie to replace Pedersons spot. Havent aactually adjusted my Fanplanner to see if this works yet.. :o
Quote from: timmyparso on December 12, 2012, 11:22:09 PM
The point of Lever is to expose the new rules.
[/quote]
A player that doesn't play is worthless regardless of rules
[/quote]
actually im picking a player purposely who wont play to take advantage of the VC loophole and the emregency loophole.
Dr DreamTeam just revealed that Pedersen is the only Def/Ruck
will still be very handy thinking about putting him on the ruck bench to make some quick cash will depend on how man rookie defenders get named round 1 if not many will start him in defense
Thats pointless and stupid -_-
When All DPP announced?
Quote from: whatlez on December 13, 2012, 01:18:49 PM
Thats pointless and stupid -_-
When All DPP announced?
Hearing that DT might open on Monday (17th) to all the people who have assistant coach?
m0nty will have it updated straight away as well won't he?
Quote from: JROO8 on December 13, 2012, 01:25:02 PM
Quote from: whatlez on December 13, 2012, 01:18:49 PM
Thats pointless and stupid -_-
When All DPP announced?
Hearing that DT might open on Monday (17th) to all the people who have assistant coach?
m0nty will have it updated straight away as well won't he?
Quote from: m0nty on December 11, 2012, 07:18:13 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 11, 2012, 07:11:45 PM
Hey Monty if sc gold gets there official player prices on Dec 17 I think it is do you have a rough eta when fan planner prices will be updated
When someone sends me the list. 8)
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 13, 2012, 01:29:58 PM
Quote from: JROO8 on December 13, 2012, 01:25:02 PM
Quote from: whatlez on December 13, 2012, 01:18:49 PM
Thats pointless and stupid -_-
When All DPP announced?
Hearing that DT might open on Monday (17th) to all the people who have assistant coach?
m0nty will have it updated straight away as well won't he?
Quote from: m0nty on December 11, 2012, 07:18:13 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 11, 2012, 07:11:45 PM
Hey Monty if sc gold gets there official player prices on Dec 17 I think it is do you have a rough eta when fan planner prices will be updated
When someone sends me the list. 8)
Cheers kilbluff :)
Hopefully he gets it straight away
He usually gets it pretty soon. :)
Won't change anything for me. I'll be starting Pedo as probably my D6, with my ruck line up being NicNat, Leu, Grundy and Witts/Daw, with a F/R DPP in the forward line.
Quote from: Holzman on December 13, 2012, 10:53:55 AM
Quote from: timmyparso on December 12, 2012, 11:22:09 PM
The point of Lever is to expose the new rules.
A player that doesn't play is worthless regardless of rules
[/quote]
actually im picking a player purposely who wont play to take advantage of the VC loophole and the emregency loophole.
[/quote]
Understand the loopholes but you'd be better off with a scoring player still to improve your teams value later in the year, I only see small short term gains by playing that game with Lever.
Anyway, it's differences in opinions like this that make each team unique.
2013 is too far away!!!!
It usually doesn't take very long for non-playing players to appear in your squad.
Pretty gay if Pedo is the ONLY B/R. The only point of him being one is you can pick him in both spots or maybe at a stretch DPP trade.
Do you think we may be able to be extra flexible with our DPP next year ? Last year it was only 1 for 1 swaps but maybe we will be able to do 3-ways ?
e.g.
Start with:
Back: Broughton -> Forward
Ruck: Pederson -> Back
Forward: NicNat -> Ruck
End with:
Back: Pederson
Ruck: NicNat
Forward: Broughton
Quote from: Scrads on December 14, 2012, 09:58:53 PM
Pretty gay if Pedo is the ONLY B/R. The only point of him being one is you can pick him in both spots or maybe at a stretch DPP trade.
Do you think we may be able to be extra flexible with our DPP next year ? Last year it was only 1 for 1 swaps but maybe we will be able to do 3-ways ?
e.g.
Start with:
Back: Broughton -> Forward
Ruck: Pederson -> Back
Forward: NicNat -> Ruck
End with:
Back: Pederson
Ruck: NicNat
Forward: Broughton
I really like the idea of a 3-way, but not involving Pedersen, NicNat and Broughton...
Quote from: Manbearpig on December 15, 2012, 01:57:40 PM
Quote from: Scrads on December 14, 2012, 09:58:53 PM
Pretty gay if Pedo is the ONLY B/R. The only point of him being one is you can pick him in both spots or maybe at a stretch DPP trade.
Do you think we may be able to be extra flexible with our DPP next year ? Last year it was only 1 for 1 swaps but maybe we will be able to do 3-ways ?
e.g.
Start with:
Back: Broughton -> Forward
Ruck: Pederson -> Back
Forward: NicNat -> Ruck
End with:
Back: Pederson
Ruck: NicNat
Forward: Broughton
I really like the idea of a 3-way, but not involving Pedersen, NicNat and Broughton...
Haha gold ;D