FanFooty Forum

FanFooty => Real Dream Team Archive => Archives => 2012 DT Player Archive => Topic started by: Windigo on March 08, 2012, 01:32:44 PM

Poll
Question: Go With A Red-Rock Combo?
Option 1: Yes votes: 8
Option 2: No votes: 11
Title: Rockliff Vs Swan
Post by: Windigo on March 08, 2012, 01:32:44 PM
Reading the DT talk article about Swan. I must say that it's mighty tempting not to roll with Swan. Get him after the bye.

Do I roll with the next Swan in Rockliff? And have a Red-Rock combo+$45,000?

Or just keep Swan?
Title: Re: Rockliff Vs Swan
Post by: Mr.Craig on March 08, 2012, 01:48:17 PM
I can see an advantage with waiting on Swan and Redden could sneak into the top 6 mids this year. A little worried about Brisbane being up and down and it affecting Red Rock's scoring but obviously it didn't hurt them last season. Go for it. 8)
Title: Re: Rockliff Vs Swan
Post by: Windigo on March 08, 2012, 05:16:01 PM
Yeah mate. Rockliff's numbers all elite. Surely he can only get better is what I'm thinking.

Swan Vs Rockliff 2012:

Games:

Swan: 21
Rockliff: 20

Tons:

Swan: 17 (from 21)
Rockliff: 15 (from 20)

Scores over 80:

Swan: 21 (All games)
Rockliff: Basically all games as well. Injured and got 59. Subbed at half.

Scores of 120+:


Swan: 11
Rockliff: 7

So I don't think there is much difference between these two jets really. Swan should stay around the same.....Or just smash a 130+ average just to spite us all.  :P While Rock should improve again, I think he was like second behind only Swan in the latter half of the season? I'm not sure though.
Title: Re: Rockliff Vs Swan
Post by: jabroni on March 08, 2012, 05:37:32 PM
wait till you see them cop a proper #1 and 2 tag before comitting
Title: Re: Rockliff Vs Swan
Post by: TheMailman on March 08, 2012, 05:46:11 PM
You'll have to remember that there will be games where Brisbane won't really get enough of the ball of Rockcliff to post scores much higher than 100 whereas Swan shouldn't have this issue
Title: Re: Rockliff Vs Swan
Post by: FRAZLER on March 08, 2012, 05:48:49 PM
Quote from: jabroni on March 08, 2012, 05:37:32 PM
wait till you see them cop a proper #1 and 2 tag before comitting
.    Swannie racks up 30 + possies whether he has a hard tag or not
Title: Re: Rockliff Vs Swan
Post by: Jukes on March 08, 2012, 06:01:52 PM
Swan is a lock for me, but can anybody answer me this; Selwood or Rockliff? Price not an issue.
Title: Re: Rockliff Vs Swan
Post by: Justin Bieber on March 08, 2012, 07:10:36 PM
Quote from: Windigo on March 08, 2012, 01:32:44 PM
Reading the DT talk article about Swan. I must say that it's mighty tempting not to roll with Swan. Get him after the bye.

Do I roll with the next Swan in Rockliff? And have a Red-Rock combo+$45,000?

Or just keep Swan?

What did they say on dt talk?
Title: Re: Rockliff Vs Swan
Post by: Windigo on March 08, 2012, 07:49:45 PM
Quote from: jabroni on March 08, 2012, 05:37:32 PM
wait till you see them cop a proper #1 and 2 tag before comitting

They didn't bother tagging Rockliff while he was on that hot streak last year....

http://dreamteamtalk.com/2012/03/08/starting-swan/ (http://dreamteamtalk.com/2012/03/08/starting-swan/)
Title: Re: Rockliff Vs Swan
Post by: Windigo on March 08, 2012, 07:57:27 PM
Quote from: Jukes on March 08, 2012, 06:01:52 PM
Swan is a lock for me, but can anybody answer me this; Selwood or Rockliff? Price not an issue.

BOTH.  8)