FanFooty Forum

FanFooty => Supercoach Archive => Archives => 2012 SC Player Archive => Topic started by: Cente on March 04, 2012, 09:49:52 PM

Poll
Question: Sam Gibson or Tom mitchell
Option 1: Sam gibson votes: 16
Option 2: Tom mitchell votes: 6
Option 3: Other specify votes: 4
Title: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Cente on March 04, 2012, 09:49:52 PM
 :)Already have Congolio, wingard and Clifton need one more please comment
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: BGK on March 04, 2012, 10:05:19 PM
Why is this even being asked? Has Mitchell even played a game? He's injured mate. Go with Gibson or even Magner, even though he isn't one of your options.
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: BGK on March 04, 2012, 10:06:03 PM
Wrong section too bud. Try to post these question is the players and trades section.
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Big_Cox14 on March 05, 2012, 01:33:20 PM
If you enjoy donuts get Mitchell.

Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: CrowsFan on March 05, 2012, 01:37:14 PM
Quote from: Big_Cox14 on March 05, 2012, 01:33:20 PM
If you enjoy donuts get Mitchell.
(http://www.pghlux.com/links/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/mmm-donuts.jpg)
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Big_Cox14 on March 05, 2012, 01:42:17 PM
Haha ... I like the Simpson's reference :)
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 02:24:25 PM
stay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Disco on March 05, 2012, 04:31:46 PM
Quotestay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear
+1
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Hippo on March 05, 2012, 05:10:36 PM
Quote from: Disco on March 05, 2012, 04:31:46 PM
Quotestay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear
+1
O please do
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 06:31:17 PM
Get the Magnet
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: BGK on March 05, 2012, 06:52:12 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 02:24:25 PM
stay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear

What's your reason for stating away from north rookies Colli?

If Gibson gets elevated I think he will be a great option.
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 06:57:38 PM
Quote from: BGK on March 05, 2012, 06:52:12 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 02:24:25 PM
stay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear

What's your reason for stating away from north rookies Colli?

If Gibson gets elevated I think he will be a great option.

Probably because Atley and Richo burnt everyone last year.
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: BGK on March 05, 2012, 07:01:38 PM
Quote from: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 06:57:38 PM
Quote from: BGK on March 05, 2012, 06:52:12 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 02:24:25 PM
stay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear

What's your reason for stating away from north rookies Colli?

If Gibson gets elevated I think he will be a great option.

Probably because Atley and Richo burnt everyone last year.

Bastinac the year before was a good option. If the player is good enough it doesn't matter who they play for.
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 07:10:34 PM
Quote from: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 06:57:38 PM
Quote from: BGK on March 05, 2012, 06:52:12 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 02:24:25 PM
stay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear

What's your reason for stating away from north rookies Colli?

If Gibson gets elevated I think he will be a great option.

Probably because Atley and Richo burnt everyone last year.

+1 exactly never trust a Scott ! play 2 games at average 80+ then drop them to the magoos for 1/2 the season while he plays muppets instead
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 07:10:56 PM
Quote from: BGK on March 05, 2012, 07:01:38 PM
Quote from: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 06:57:38 PM
Quote from: BGK on March 05, 2012, 06:52:12 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 02:24:25 PM
stay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear

What's your reason for stating away from north rookies Colli?

If Gibson gets elevated I think he will be a great option.


Probably because Atley and Richo burnt everyone last year.

Bastinac the year before was a good option. If the player is good enough it doesn't matter who they play for.

Yeah I know, I've got Gibson. I was just saying..
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 07:12:05 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 07:10:34 PM
Quote from: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 06:57:38 PM
Quote from: BGK on March 05, 2012, 06:52:12 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 02:24:25 PM
stay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear

What's your reason for stating away from north rookies Colli?

If Gibson gets elevated I think he will be a great option.

Probably because Atley and Richo burnt everyone last year.

+1 exactly never trust a Scott ! play 2 games at average 80+ then drop them to the magoos for 1/2 the season while he plays muppets instead

Pederson being the NO.1 example
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: BGK on March 05, 2012, 07:25:08 PM
Quote from: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 07:12:05 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 07:10:34 PM
Quote from: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 06:57:38 PM
Quote from: BGK on March 05, 2012, 06:52:12 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 02:24:25 PM
stay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear

What's your reason for stating away from north rookies Colli?

If Gibson gets elevated I think he will be a great option.

Probably because Atley and Richo burnt everyone last year.

+1 exactly never trust a Scott ! play 2 games at average 80+ then drop them to the magoos for 1/2 the season while he plays muppets instead

Pederson being the NO.1 example

Never trust a Scott? Allen Christensen anybody?

If Gibson is good enough and plays well enough Scott won't be able to drop him.

The only reason Pederson was dropped originally was he wasn't needed. When North had some injuries he got his shot and showed that he was good enough.
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 07:28:20 PM
Quote from: BGK on March 05, 2012, 07:25:08 PM
Quote from: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 07:12:05 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 07:10:34 PM
Quote from: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 06:57:38 PM
Quote from: BGK on March 05, 2012, 06:52:12 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 02:24:25 PM
stay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear

What's your reason for stating away from north rookies Colli?

If Gibson gets elevated I think he will be a great option.

Probably because Atley and Richo burnt everyone last year.

+1 exactly never trust a Scott ! play 2 games at average 80+ then drop them to the magoos for 1/2 the season while he plays muppets instead

Pederson being the NO.1 example

Never trust a Scott? Allen Christensen anybody?

If Gibson is good enough and plays well enough Scott won't be able to drop him.

The only reason Pederson was dropped originally was he wasn't needed. When North had some injuries he got his shot and showed that he was good enough.

Bundy is da bomb!  :P
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 07:48:11 PM
Quote from: BGK on March 05, 2012, 07:25:08 PM
Quote from: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 07:12:05 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 07:10:34 PM
Quote from: Bosh on March 05, 2012, 06:57:38 PM
Quote from: BGK on March 05, 2012, 06:52:12 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 02:24:25 PM
stay away from north melbourne rooks, and mitchell is an upgrade target for after he comes back from injury, there is a multitude of options for your mids rooks tho so never fear

What's your reason for stating away from north rookies Colli?

If Gibson gets elevated I think he will be a great option.

Probably because Atley and Richo burnt everyone last year.

+1 exactly never trust a Scott ! play 2 games at average 80+ then drop them to the magoos for 1/2 the season while he plays muppets instead

Pederson being the NO.1 example

Never trust a Scott? Allen Christensen anybody?

If Gibson is good enough and plays well enough Scott won't be able to drop him.

The only reason Pederson was dropped originally was he wasn't needed. When North had some injuries he got his shot and showed that he was good enough.

Good Point on Christo BGK - he was vested 6 times however but i guess so was gaff and other up and comers, im just doging because i had atley and pedersen, i should have know the Roos line up better before the start of 2011, well i know it better now, but im still shy
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: The Bomber on March 05, 2012, 08:17:59 PM
they were praises being sung about tom mitchell...what has happened to those???
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: Colliwobblers on March 05, 2012, 08:18:49 PM
Quote from: The Bomber on March 05, 2012, 08:17:59 PM
they were praises being sung about tom mitchell...what has happened to those???

GUN - injured  :-\
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: TheMailman on March 05, 2012, 10:56:40 PM
Quote from: The Bomber on March 05, 2012, 08:17:59 PM
they were praises being sung about tom mitchell...what has happened to those???

The swans definately aren't playing him first round.

I don't even think he'll be an downgrade target. He'll probably be in and out of the side from round 3 onwards
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: meow meow on March 05, 2012, 11:06:29 PM
Round 3? More like round 13.
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: TheMailman on March 05, 2012, 11:17:00 PM
Quote from: meow meow on March 05, 2012, 11:06:29 PM
Round 3? More like round 13.

There was legit a 1 supposed to be there   :P
Title: Re: Sam Gibson or Tom MItchell
Post by: The Supercoach on March 05, 2012, 11:35:24 PM
Im sorry but the saying never trust a scott is an absolute joke, im not trying to be rude by the way.

Round 2 2011 - Pederson clearly didnt get another game as Goldstien was ready to comeback in, as was Petrie.

Cam Richardson was being built up by everyone in the fantasy world. THATS UR FAULT. Brad scott never said, 'quick, everyone should get Richardson as he will be a star and a great first year player' that was the Fantasy world. (although he would not have thought he would be that BAD)

Atley: He was a young body that will get better over time. Not everyone can be a ryan bastinac

GIBSON: He is a mature age recruit who has good experience as a VFL player and could perform really well this year. Im not saying get him, but watch him again against western bulldogs, and if he looks good and 'U' like the look of him then put him in ur team.

Again Im not trying to be rude, just saying never trust a scott is a silly saying. ;)