Hey guys, I'm having a bit of trouble deciding between the two big fellas? Who would you pick and why?
burger cause he is 50 000 cheaper if for 2nd ruck if only 1 go mummy
I've got both.
I'd go leuenberger because he is cheaper and mummy seems to miss games through little injuries and suspension. They are both great options though. I had mummy last year, like most people who started with sandi, and my god didn't he tear it up.
Mummy, He is better around the ground and imo his tap work is better as well. He seems to clear the ball a lot when it's in a tight huddle and tackles a lot more than burger.
Quote from: coolfugitiv0 on February 08, 2012, 11:41:57 PM
Quote from: jamesalex on February 08, 2012, 08:28:24 PM
I've got both.
Ditto!
I like your style my friend.
+2 ;)
Little Risk and great ceiling for both. Think it will be quite a unique combo to have these 2 but with very little risk. Im sure at some stage Ill be swearing at not having cox after a 180 odd though :P
I wish I could afford both. I have Nic Nat instead of Mumford.
mummy if u can afford. but dont sacrifice another important upgrade for him.
I have both but if I had to choose one I would choose Mumford.
mummy vs gws in round 1 he'll destroy them
Both will score great this season ill say luey tho. Reckon brisbane are on the up which means more points for him :-)
Quote from: CuStArDaRm on February 09, 2012, 01:13:27 AM
Quote from: coolfugitiv0 on February 08, 2012, 11:41:57 PM
Quote from: jamesalex on February 08, 2012, 08:28:24 PM
I've got both.
Ditto!
I like your style my friend.
+2 ;)
Little Risk and great ceiling for both. Think it will be quite a unique combo to have these 2 but with very little risk. Im sure at some stage Ill be swearing at not having cox after a 180 odd though :P
+3!! Although I thought it was going to be a unique combo as well, but it looks like there might be a few others out there thinking exactly the same way... Damn! ;)