So who would you take. Ideally both but if you could only pick one which one. Pendles was top overall scorer last year but also played more than swan.
I've gone pendlebury cause of his age
Swannie - DT
Pendles - SC
for me it is the other way round
Swan
DT - 121
SC - 122
Pendles
DT - 116
SC - 129
Go figure. I agree both are champions but surely Swannie is a better DTer and Pendles a better SCer.
yeah but heading into this year. If you were taking your first pick in the draft who would you take
What draft? For the next 5 years? Or for this year?
This year = Swan
Long term = Pendles (only cos of age)
this year only
i.e you play dt gold and you have the draft would you pick pendles or swan
Swan in DT
Pendles in SC
My opinion but I doubt I'm alone in thinking that.
Quote from: elephants on February 04, 2012, 04:42:15 PM
What draft? For the next 5 years? Or for this year?
This year = Swan
Long term = Pendles (only cos of age)
euros my top 2 were
1) pendles
2) selwood
then ablett/swannie jostling for 3 :P
hmmmm. thats a tough one. i saw a pic of pendlebry and he looks fitter/beefier. swan has more tattoos.
what ever happens i think they will ave within 2 points of each other
Any chance Buckley will mix things up a bit?
Swan had a slight injury last year missed a game etc.. it affected his scores slightly .. Swan for me
Rockliff is the new Swan. He will be the breakout of 2012, I'm tipping a 117+ avg.
I have taken Pendles, I can honestly not say why though...
Maybe because he likes basketball so much, who knows?
Quote from: Torpedo10 on February 04, 2012, 06:51:18 PM
Rockliff is the new Swan. He will be the breakout of 2012, I'm tipping a 117+ avg.
Umm this is out of swan or pendles not stupid rockliff
I am leaning slightly towards pendles but it is very tight. Just wanted to know everyones thoughts
When in doubt, go both.
Quote from: stew42 on February 04, 2012, 09:28:54 PM
When in doubt, go both.
I wish. Can't go both of them and Barlow though!
Heheh, don't go Barlow then... ;)
... I'm so hipster. Don't see me conforming! 8)