Who is a better option? What do you think there averages will be this year???
Regards Jalapeno ;D
Barlow all the way. Watson too injury prone. Good when he's going but won't give you 22 games
probably pretty similar averages, 5 points either way.. barlow is better value though
Dont think his that injury proned numbers from preious seasons:
2006 21 games
2007 19 games
2008 19 games
2009 21 games
2010 21 games
2011 16 games
Watson isn't injury prone, and will score more than Barlow IMO this year.
But... Barlow's cheaper :)
Pretty tough choice. Cannot split them. Barlow we know can score heavily and Jobe hovers around the 100.
Hm.
Quote from: Purple 77 on February 02, 2012, 04:45:14 PM
Watson isn't injury prone, and will score more than Barlow IMO this year.
But... Barlow's cheaper :)
+1 Both players are out and out guns but Barlow is too cheap to ignore.
I'm with BT. BARLOW!
In my opinion it comes down to the cometition.
Barlow in DT, Watson in SC.
I know Jobe has been a consistant player BUT I think the lack of midfield depth at the bombers could hurt him a bit. (due to taggers). ATM he would be an upgrade target if he has a big start :)
Micky B
as long as Lyon doesn't try some of his crap
Barlow cause he's a gun
Quote from: whatlez on February 03, 2012, 07:28:59 PM
Barlow cause he's a gun
Think Watson's stats stand up pretty well...
Both are guns but for this... BARLOW!!