MIDS: Christensen, Swan, Thomas, Murphy, Boyd, Ablett (Gaff, rookie, rooke)
DEF: Gibbs, Deledio, Goddard, Suckling, Enright, ( rookie, rookie) (rookie, rookie, rookie)
FWD:Sylvia, Franklin, Fyfe, Pavlich, Chapman (rookie, rookie) (rookie, rookie, rookie
RUCK: Cox, Goldstein (rookie, rookie)
Christensen for me, is going to be a gun for geelong his work rate, is phenomenal, and gaff is going to be a gun..
what do people thing there team will look like?
Quote from: nickowns on July 21, 2011, 06:33:25 PM
MIDS: Christensen, Swan, Thomas, Murphy, Boyd, Ablett (Gaff, rookie, rooke)
DEF: Gibbs, Deledio, Goddard, Suckling, Enright, ( rookie, rookie) (rookie, rookie, rookie)
FWD:Sylvia, Franklin, Fyfe, Pavlich, Chapman (rookie, rookie) (rookie, rookie, rookie
RUCK: Cox, Goldstein (rookie, rookie)
Christensen for me, is going to be a gun for geelong his work rate, is phenomenal, and gaff is going to be a gun..
what do people thing there team will look like?
post this in my 2012 thread and you will probably get more responses
I think you have written it up poorly. lol
Do you think you will have enough cash for that. Looks very pricey. I see your going guns and rooks strategy. It looks good but as i said very expensive. Christensen is a BIG ??
Quote from: bestguykai on July 21, 2011, 06:37:35 PM
I think you have written it up poorly. lol
Do you think you will have enough cash for that. Looks very pricey. I see your going guns and rooks strategy. It looks good but as i said very expensive. Christensen is a BIG ??
i really doubt that team is possible mabyee to end up with a team like that.
no not the best 22,
like at the beggining, that might be acheivable or just get rid of a premium Mid and then upgrade, half way through
Gibbs, Goddard, Broughton, Waters, Grimes, Lake, Connors
Swan, Ablett, Selwood, Barlow/Montagna/Mundy/Pendles, Hayes, Rookie
Sandilands, Mcintosh
Franklin, Chapman, Pavlich, Riewoldt, Didak, Brown, Rookie/Fev
maybee its possible but this is my team i actually attempted to calc prices and stay in a budget.
oh shower i forgot about barlow, his price will drop, alot!
i believe i will be able to fit those players, in.. maybe might need to adjust a few
and i reckon you need to main rucks, and build your team around them.
and idunno about you im unsure about the players, which have played 50+ games and are cheap,
sometimes it pays out though
Quote from: nickowns on July 21, 2011, 07:00:50 PM
oh shower i forgot about barlow, his price will drop, alot!
i believe i will be able to fit those players, in.. maybe might need to adjust a few
and i reckon you need to main rucks, and build your team around them.
and idunno about you im unsure about the players, which have played 50+ games and are cheap,
sometimes it pays out though
Cox and Petrie have been good all year, i think Sandialnds and HMAC will do the same next year. If HMAC stays with the roos than i wouldnt pick up goldy.
i heard hamish is off to another club, thats what they said on the footy show
Quote from: nickowns on July 22, 2011, 01:11:55 PM
i heard hamish is off to another club, thats what they said on the footy show
i didnt watch the show so i cant say anything about this but this article leads me to believe he is staying
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/roo-ruckman-hamish-mcintosh-going-nowhere/story-e6frf9io-1226087741141
If McIntosh stays he wont play Goldstein is number 1 ruck and it could be argued Petrie is in career best form
having said all of that if McIntosh goes do not be surprised if Goldstein or Petrie have knee injuries next year
Lenny Hayes & Michael Barlow will be 2 very undervalued premium mids. well worth a look.
Jonathan Brown, with a full pre-season under the belt and a sub $300K pricetag, will also be worth a look too.
Quote from: Cicjose on July 22, 2011, 01:41:59 PM
If McIntosh stays he wont play Goldstein is number 1 ruck and it could be argued Petrie is in career best form
having said all of that if McIntosh goes do not be surprised if Goldstein or Petrie have knee injuries next year
Mcintosh could play a simular role to nic nat and i think that is the plan. ONe of them is in the forward line while the other rucks. Ahs the advantage as both are dangerous forwards and however is in the forward line can ruck when its up there. Should mean that one of them is up for every contest and they should tire out 1 ruck teams. In the past he has floated up forward a couple of times and picked up 2-3 goals.