So I had an idea moments ago which Ive been discussing with my brother. Ellard (MID $242k) is on the bubble with a BE of -14 with scores of 112 and 100. If I downgraded Swan (MID $481k) I'm pocketing about $232k cash with Ellard likely rising in price and Swan falling. I'd probably get Swan back in after the second bye, possibly even a cheap upgrade from Ellard.
Am I crazy or does this plan have some merit? Does the risk outweigh the reward? Give us your thoughts
Btw I have 19 trades left and $81k in the bank. I just saw similar ideas have been posted in other threads but not with Ellard. Regardless im sorry for my possible noobness in starting a new thread!
wasting 2 trades for less points and possibly only making 150k (ie swan down to 430k, ellard to 380k) i think is ridiculous.
horrible move. If you really want ellard that much, straight swap or upgrade a rook to him.
wow! ellard sucks no way man
Yeah, definitely crazy :o
haha guess thats a 'no' then? Point taken :P
it's a pretty clear and resounding no.
2 trades for 150 k no way, plus the swan points u miss when u dont have him,
its good being creative and thinkin outside the box just not this time though
thats worse than my Swan > Watson call
at least Jobe is a proven gun,
Ellard is a crab!
you're crazy
you've lost the bleedin plot mate!
do you have any brains in that head of yours or what?!
dont clog up these forums with this trash. carn.
wow, maybe a little too harsh :P
This must of been a joke.
I did the same with goddard round too...but i traded him for curnow...i made 380k which is a showerload. In a week or two goddard would have dropped 100k and curnow wouldve gone up 200k. So really i didnt lose any points as they averaged the same and if i wanted to trade him back in it will only cost me 80k...so i made 300k out of 2 trades...now thats good.
But in your case you've gotta weigh up the fact that you wont get 200k from ellard and swan wont drop 100k most likely...ellard might go up 100k and swan might fall 50k. so really your spending 2 trades to make 150k, not much in the scheme of things.
Quote from: Joe Dirt on May 05, 2011, 06:18:34 PM
I did the same with goddard round too...but i traded him for curnow...i made 380k which is a showerload. In a week or two goddard would have dropped 100k and curnow wouldve gone up 200k. So really i didnt lose any points as they averaged the same and if i wanted to trade him back in it will only cost me 80k...so i made 300k out of 2 trades...now thats good.
But in your case you've gotta weigh up the fact that you wont get 200k from ellard and swan wont drop 100k most likely...ellard might go up 100k and swan might fall 50k. so really your spending 2 trades to make 150k, not much in the scheme of things.
Not really. Obviously you don't know who Goddard is and that the season has just begun - and that Saints have had their bye and Blues haven't.
Quote from: Master Q on May 05, 2011, 06:20:17 PM
Quote from: Joe Dirt on May 05, 2011, 06:18:34 PM
I did the same with goddard round too...but i traded him for curnow...i made 380k which is a showerload. In a week or two goddard would have dropped 100k and curnow wouldve gone up 200k. So really i didnt lose any points as they averaged the same and if i wanted to trade him back in it will only cost me 80k...so i made 300k out of 2 trades...now thats good.
But in your case you've gotta weigh up the fact that you wont get 200k from ellard and swan wont drop 100k most likely...ellard might go up 100k and swan might fall 50k. so really your spending 2 trades to make 150k, not much in the scheme of things.
Not really. Obviously you don't know who Goddard is and that the season has just begun - and that Saints have had their bye and Blues haven't.
What are you "not really"ing to?
Dont worry Joe, thats just another pointless uninformed comment from Q
The fact the Saints have had their bye and the Blues haven't actually lends weight to your argument. Curnow has scored over 130 points more than Goddard this season, not a small number for a rookie and he can easily hit 310k next week before his bye. Thats a 220k profit, add to that the 70k loss you would have experienced had you held Goddard and you are talking about a tidy team value increase. Not a bad move if you are going for the car imo.
yeah, go on and do it. I think your dreamteam will be better for it.........
I know the last post on this thing was a month ago but i had to bring it up again.
Dmod, if you traded out Swan you're a flowering genius.
Quote from: PowerBug on June 05, 2011, 12:54:55 PM
I know the last post on this thing was a month ago but i had to bring it up again.
Dmod, if you traded out Swan you're a flowering genius.
Bit of a Nostradamus hey! Thats the problem you have with posting your ideas here, you get shot down and peer pressure takes over. Swan has said he will miss 2 games and the bye, I might be looking at doing something similar in this instance. Listen to advice, but go with your gut. My gut is telling me Swan to Scully and upgrade Stanley! :D
lol, not really genius, closer to a fluke. That being said, sometimes you have to break the rules. Although, plenty of times people who break the rules just get burnt... if he made this trade, he was lucky he didn't :P
:-X
I think it takes balls to call an injury to a player and actually trade him out thinking he will be underprforming. Great if you get it right, so very bad if you get it wrong.
WIth swan's popularity, it woulda been a good risk. Your balls woulda been sore afterwards, but worth it.
I traded Swan out - although it was for Flowering CHapman who has gone missing since i got him in.
"Crazy, crazy, crazy, crazy thought." :P
My team has gone up in the rankings every week since and with Swan to miss a few games now I could jump even further.
The thought of buying Swan for less than 400K is mouth-watering though...
If the comp had 48 trades for the year it would be a good idea but you need to buget your trades.
yeah a bit crazy. better options out thre than ellard in my opinion
Quote from: Memphistopheles on June 05, 2011, 08:27:20 PM
My team has gone up in the rankings every week since and with Swan to miss a few games now I could jump even further.
The thought of buying Swan for less than 400K is mouth-watering though...
same dude, at BE of 140 and now priced at 397K, is a 360K swan pick up out of the question? i dont think so!
so yummy.
why do you always post this dirt? you DID NOT make money trading goddard to curnow round 2 at all. you start off with a salary cap.....you can use it any ways you want to. when you traded goddard to curnow you still had the EXACT SAME salary cap total....you just chose to waste a trade and spread it out a different way.
however if you were to say i traded curnow when he got injured to a bubble rookie...then you MADE MONEY.
not hard to comprehend is it
Quote from: unceramonius on June 06, 2011, 11:47:46 AM
why do you always post this dirt? you DID NOT make money trading goddard to curnow round 2 at all. you start off with a salary cap.....you can use it any ways you want to. when you traded goddard to curnow you still had the EXACT SAME salary cap total....you just chose to waste a trade and spread it out a different way.
however if you were to say i traded curnow when he got injured to a bubble rookie...then you MADE MONEY.
not hard to comprehend is it
I disagree! Sure, he didn't make money with the initial trade, but he made it in the long run! It's like making a good investment. Well worth the trade (although very risky).
with that logic your both invited in my leauge anytime. the big thing he keeps posting is he made 380 k from that trade in round 2!!!!!!! HE DIDNT. he made ZERO money from the trade. it was a ridiculous trade at best. hardly any defenders are carving it up and with goddard carving it back up...you gona bring him in again?
two trades wasted. better move would have been keeping BOTH, by trading a atley/irons/bewick round 2.
my biggest gripe is him trying to sound like a genius, oooooooh i made 380 k......you made nothing mate
Dude, I wouldn't have ever done it. And it wasn't a genius move... It was a LUCKY move, but it payed off.
Assuming he traded out Curnow when he got injured, that's $183,400 made. If he traded in Goddard now, he still gets him but avoided the $143,000 lost. That's a total of $326,400 for two trades and I would take that any day of the week.
No, he didn't make any money from the initial downgrade (so to speak) because it was before any price changes, but he still made over $300k from two trades and that is bloody good. I don't know what you have against it, but it ended up being the right move (however lucky). Plus, Curnow averaged more over that period than Goddard, so he gained points as well!
it was a flowering fluke, but a good move. We've seen it happen a couple of times around here.
to put it simply, it was a showerhouse trade that ended up being beneficial.
why would you even trade goddard to begin with? you would make more trading out a crap rookie...ie irons/atley/bewick for curnow round 2. with goddard returning to form, its two trades wasted on the one player....very BAD move.
what next? ooooh montagna/sylvia/swan have had injuries, ill trade them out and make money by trading them. when the reality is you make zero dollars doing this.
it wasnt even lucky, it was just stupid. trading irons though to curnow is lucky. trading bewick to liberatore is lucky. trading goddard in round 2....dumb
how do you people view this then....
with a midfield of swan, pendles, boyd, bartell, selwood, montagna , what is the consensus in trading swan to ablett now, and then when swan returns trading bartell to him, to avoid two cats in the same line round 22. we all know if you win your first final your fine..but bartell playing forward equals massive drop in points.
no, I agree, it was stupid, but it worked, that's what made it lucky.
Those that were talking about trading swan a few weeks back were also stupid, but honestly their team probably would have been better off in hindsight. Their flukes from dodgy trades, but just because a trade appears bad doesn't mean it'll have negative results.
Same thing for trades that appear good. Like trading in Sylvia this week. Looked like a good trade, was one of the highest avging fwds from memory, then he goes and gets his leg corked. Unlucky. Good trade that went south.
Honestly, with that line up, I would consider doing it. But only under the following conditions
1. You have a LOT of trades left
2. You're still in the hunt for overall.
apart from that, gtfo.
Quote from: unceramonius on June 06, 2011, 01:07:35 PM
why would you even trade goddard to begin with? you would make more trading out a crap rookie...ie irons/atley/bewick for curnow round 2. with goddard returning to form, its two trades wasted on the one player....very BAD move.
Did you even read what I wrote? By trading out Goddard and then bringing him back in, he makes $143,000. That's not nothing, that's $143,000. He wouldn't have made as much trading out a crap rookie because a crap rookies isn't going to lose the $143,000 that Goddard lost. It was very lucky but a GOOD move.
but if he brings him back he WASTES two trades. goddards loss is irrelevant because you brought him in your team to keep.
he doesnt make more money trading goddard than a rookie to begin with, thats pretty silly to say. how so?
by keeping goddard, and trading a irons to curnow...he can upgrade curnow to a keeper with the money curnow makes by a usual downgrade/upgrade.
by trading goddard, he now has two holes to fill later on. wasteing a trade bringing goddard back, and then what? using his generated cash from an irons or atley to upgrade curnow? lol
people are missing the point here, he clearly thinks he is a genius because he made 380 k in round 2, did he make 380 k in round 2? ummm .....no he didnt. was it a smart move? hell no it wasnt. was it a lucky move? no not really..curnow got injured too.
lose lose lose by my estimations
Your ignorance upsets me...
1. He didn't waste two trades, he used them (however unwisely) and made $326,400
2. He does make more money because firstly, he makes the money that Goddard lost AND the money (however little) the rookie would make)
3. That downgrade/upgrade is two trades. Considering the normal downgrade gets you approximately $150k max, making over $300k with the Goddard --> Curnow move means that's two less downgrades he has to make later. That means 4 trades for 2 premiums BUT he doesn't have to get rid of other cash cows for those trades. Therefore, good move.
4. He doesn't need to generate cash from Irons or Atley, he generated over $300k from his other trade!
5. I'm not disagreeing with that part. He didn't make $380k in round 2. But he made close to that after.
wow forget it i give up. the money he generates from trading a rookie round 2 is EXTRA cash. the money he gets from doing goddard instead is the SAME cash,as he hasnt generated any extra from his initial salary cap.
goddard was a keeper, so he isnt some physcological warrior now primed to make two upgrades. who will one of those be? goddard? lol. you DONT MAKE any money that a premium losers.
oooooooh il downgrade swan to callinan and make me over 300k!!!! problem is swan was part of initial salary cap and i make ZERO doing this. if callinan makes 150 k,and swan drops another 30k, do i make 180 k? no i dont. i would be an idiot who should have traded somebody else (krakouer) to callinan. than id make the money from the trade PLUS whatever callinan makes.
not hard to understand. you will forever be a coach in waiting supporting those moves. but alas i move on.
unceramonius, what about the fact that curnow averaged more than goddard aswell at the start of the year?
imo not a waste of two trades, if he traded goddard-> curnow, and then upgraded 2 rookies after ~6-7 rounds to premiums (using the spare 380k) it definately benefited his team
wow unceramonius....you must have the smallest brain...ok ill put it simply for you...
Say my team value was worth X. trading out goddard for curnow doesn't change that. but when goddard goes down 140k, and curnow goes up 180k, my team value increases from X to (X + 140k + 180k) compared to if i had've kept goddard. So with the 380k which i earned from this, i can upgrade curnow to Goddard for 60k, and still have 320k to upgrade 2 rookies. So really i have used 4 trades to get 2 premiums which is normal how ever i didnt have to use two rookies to downgrade them, so i still have two 250k rookies sitting on my bench instead of 100k rookies.
ive already said your a genius!!!!!!!!!!! the best coach to ever coach. with moves like that...with your savvy.......the car is yours. you will never comprehend that you were far far better off trading a worse rookie for curnow and keeping goddard. replacing a premium with a premium later is not an upgrade. i cant put it any simpler...so if i have a small brain..then i guess we have a lot in common.
whats your team name and ranking great one?
Too much writing. I support whoever is winning the battle.
Quote from: unceramonius on June 06, 2011, 04:18:22 PM
ive already said your a genius!!!!!!!!!!! the best coach to ever coach. with moves like that...with your savvy.......the car is yours. you will never comprehend that you were far far better off trading a worse rookie for curnow and keeping goddard. replacing a premium with a premium later is not an upgrade. i cant put it any simpler...so if i have a small brain..then i guess we have a lot in common.
whats your team name and ranking great one?
you sir are a cvnt
haha yeah i think unceramonius thinks its too much reading too as he mustn't read all our posts coz he still doesn't understand haha team name is Kamakazi and im in sitting nicely without Goddard at 2642.
plugz and dirt i swear the people here are utter tools. plugz espicially with his pathetic sensor by passing.
goddard out..to curnow...1 trade...no money made
down grade to generate money to upgrade curnow ....1 trade
upgrading curnow....1 trade
bringing back goddard..or "upgrading" as you would put it your weakened defense....1 trade
4 trades for 1 premium. as i said GENIUS
keep goddard......trade irons/atley/bewick for curnow...1 trade
downgrade to generate funds to upgrade.....1 trade
upgrade curnow........1 trade
3 trades but you have TWO PREMIUMS.
please enter my leauges next year:)
goddard->curnow= 1 trade
after round 7, use that 380k freed up from the trade to do curnow(280k)->marc murphy (411k) [cost=131k]
also after round 9, trade duigan (234k)->suckling (340k) [cost=106k]
3 trades, 2 premiums, more points scored and still have 140k in the bank from the first trade made
hahahahahaha you are the slowest bloke i have ever known!
How does trading Goddard to curnow = no money made? thats the whole reason i did it...i got 380k in my bank because of it
goddard out..to curnow...1 trade...380k made
upgrading curnow to premium....1 trade 250k still left in bank
bringing back goddard for a 250k rookie ....1 trade 170k still left in bank
upgrading a 250k rookie to a premium...1 trade
4 trades for 3 premiums. Genius!!!
keep goddard......trade irons/atley/bewick for curnow...1 trade
downgrade to generate funds to upgrade.....1 trade
upgrade curnow........1 trade
downgrade to generate funds to upgrade.....1 trade
upgrade 250k rookie to premium...1 trade
5 trades to have 3 premiums
So i made 1 more trade and got 1 more premium in!
You've gotta make another downgrade and an upgrade, using up 2 more 250k rookies just to get where i am! Do you understand now? Surely?
lol your pretty damn slow. explain to me just how you make 380 k by trading goddard to curnow? did you find a glitch to have a bigger salary cap?
yes you have 380 k IN THE BANK, but you didnt MAKE 380 k like you keep saying. do you post this crap over and over on dt talk too? cause i swear i keep seeing this there and you keep getting shot down there, here it seems to be lets praise crap moves to better our own chances. sounds like dr dream team.
also your severly over estimating your money with your trades. curnow got up to about 275, 280 k. add 130 k for a premium huh? i dont remeber pendles, boyd, selwood being that price ever. which leaves you short for that supposed 250 k rookie upgrade, as if you really are getting two premiums like you say...you would need at least another 60 k,probably even more.
what your doing is taking away a premium but then counting them in again after. so in your example its still 4 trades for TWO premiums. goddard doesnt count, you already had him and traded him out. what your essentialy doing there is sideways trading your back premiums.
i know what your saying, and i keep saying, your invited im my leauge anytime. id love more people like you. the whole im a "genius" thing is just plain silly.
no im not on DT talk or what ever ur on about.
And ablett was 410k, swan is less than 400k, murphy was below 400k, thompson is 400k, mundy below 400k, bartel 360k and selwood was worth 410k at one point too loser (which is 280+130k for slowies). But good argument there hahahahahahahaha
and how do you not understand, that when you sell someone at 480k for someone at 100k you put 380k in the bank which is all we care about. i know i dont get an extra 380k in my salary cap. all i care is that i get money in my bank to upgrade rookies to premiums. and thats what ive got. I just really can't believe you dont understand this...ask your mates (if u got any) and they will explain the maths to you as i have tried a hundred times and hence my trade is better than doing a bewick to curnow trade.
his point is I think, that those $ were part of your original salary cap, and so you don't make money on it. But people who honestly could have anticipated goddards form slump or swans injury pre-season and subsequently didn't pick them, were bs liars who ended up being very lucky.
Those that traded goddard out before his price drop to someone like curnow, made a stupid move and a horrible trade, and I would say they're either very ballsy or very stupid for doing it. But, if you honestly can't see how it lucked out in benefiting their team, then you're pretty stupid.
dirt...you said round 7. your clutching at straws mate....your plan and logic is severly flawed. now your just randomly spewing out names....hoping they fit with your proposed plan.
face it...your genius plan, wasnt possible.
this topic can die...but to furthur the point. you dont have murphey, or suckling (very big stretch to consider a premo) but you STILL have curnow, who is LOSING you money.
you havent benefited from this at all genius. duffield, duigan,stanley , lower all starting on the field.
What you on about unceramonius? i never said anything about round 7. and if you do the maths all my trades work....
goddard out..to curnow...1 trade...380k made
upgrading curnow to premium....1 trade 250k still left in bank
bringing back goddard for a 250k rookie ....1 trade 170k still left in bank
upgrading a 250k rookie to a premium...1 trade
I know it was lucky but it ended out being an amazing trade.
the figures i used were the actual prices curnow, murphy, duigan and suckling were
and ziplock's got it right, bad trade but the outcome of it would have been awesome for those who did it
pretty much, 4 trades, 2 new premiums, 3 premiums all up, Curnow outscoring goddard, sounds fine to me.
I'd just like to point out that I was right with all of my comments ;)
EDIT: Sorry, that was awful and I really hope this doesn't start things up again. Just couldn't help myself :P
haha yeah you were right lahug...this guy just can't admit defeat when he knows he's wrong (although im beginning to think he might be that dumb and actually believe the things he's saying). Well good duscussion...end of topic!!!
im not wrong....you just have a few boyfriends here who praise bad decisions.
you keep saying this plan gets you 3 premiums or something. but your only talking in hindsight...as you still have CURNOW. i could say the same thing about swan.........oh gee um i traded him to callinan and made myself 400 k!!!!!!! with that i could get 4 premiums with 4 trades....im a genius.
how can you be...when you yourself havent even followed your "plan". how much will curnow lose you AGAIN next week? about another 20 k. at that price ...youve basically traded goddard for a generic rookie....unless you intend to keep him.
GENIUS lol. and im all for this topic to die....so feel free to let it
lol, curnow hasn't been traded yet? That does make it a substantially worse decision.
that being said, in the hypothetical scenario that LaHug and myself were presenting, it was a shocking trade that ended up working out. If you really could not to see the following
1. It was a crap trade
and
2. Through flukes and chance it could have ended being beneficial to the team
Then you're a flowering idiot.
I'd like the reiterate, it was a BAD trade. But, because of the money curnow quickly made, the points curnow scored in comparison to goddard, and the money goddard loss (which ordinarily wouldn't be a factor considering it doesn't matter how much cash is lost by a premium, but seeing as he traded him out and in hypothetically, it was), it could have ended up, if the timing worked out with the trades, being a lucky and fluky trade.
Had curnow not gotten injured, it would have been a very lucky trade. I mean, Goddard started the season appallingly, by playing the right combination of rookies you probably could have picked up more points than him. He was averaging something ridiculous like 30 points under his 2010 average. Honestly, if I'd had a magic 8 ball back then and known the future, I probably would have traded out Swan + Goddard when they peaked (although for other premiums that my magic future telling ability told me would smash it), grab the extra points from these premiums, as well as essentially making me like 100k+ as swan and goddard plummet at their respective places in the season.
Then trade them in just before my magic ball says their going to be killing it, and you're laughing.
How could you define that as a waste of a trade when I've made probably around 300grand from 4 trades (not quite worth it), but also 20- 30 points per player I traded out. That's worth it.
of course, I don't have a magic 8 ball, and subsequently I didn't make those trades, but that being said, the curnow trade was just a slightly more interesting variation of that possibility.
Not only does he outscore Goddard pretty much week in week out, he makes considerable money (nearly 200 grand) while goddard loses considerable money (nearly 100 grand), if you'd traded curnow prior to injury and were jumping on goddard last week, you'd be laughing.
Doesn't seem to be what happened in this case, but doesn't stop the trades from working to a degree.
If you want to go hack on us again, call us flowering idiots, etc. etc., fine. But, unless you're coming 1st in the competition atm, clearly you don't know everything about DT either (like our selves), so maybe you should consider shutting the flower up.
noob.
whats all this flower nonsense? sounds slightly queer. ive said my piece, and nobody is going to change my mind.
as for being noob....lololololololololol. i was ranked 1200 last week, until i copped a sylvia sub,a chapman dissapearance,the once a year suspect injury to buddy, montagna copping an injury first play of the game...and sitting dids with his bye IN THE SAME ROUND.
i wouldnt be saying your welcome in my leauge anytime...without actually meaning it
Quote from: unceramonius on June 07, 2011, 07:29:35 PM
whats all this flower nonsense? sounds slightly queer. ive said my piece, and nobody is going to change my mind.
as for being noob....lololololololololol. i was ranked 1200 last week, until i copped a sylvia sub,a chapman dissapearance,the once a year suspect injury to buddy, montagna copping an injury first play of the game...and sitting dids with his bye IN THE SAME ROUND.
i wouldnt be saying your welcome in my leauge anytime...without actually meaning it
Sorry mate, got to be tough. Great DTers would've been expecting it and have been ready for it. So that put you, and me, in the spot of good DTers.
LOL.
meh.....dream teams 80% luck. the exact same team can get you 2200 one week, and 1800 the next. ill bounce back this week
unless there is a tornado that calls off the game whih most of your players in.
Quote from: unceramonius on June 07, 2011, 07:29:35 PM
whats all this flower nonsense? sounds slightly queer. ive said my piece, and nobody is going to change my mind.
as for being noob....lololololololololol. i was ranked 1200 last week, until i copped a sylvia sub,a chapman dissapearance,the once a year suspect injury to buddy, montagna copping an injury first play of the game...and sitting dids with his bye IN THE SAME ROUND.
i wouldnt be saying your welcome in my leauge anytime...without actually meaning it
there's an automatic censor on this site. Basically, flower= f uck and shower= s hit. If you couldn't work that out you really are lacking in the brains department aye?
DT is actually about 20-30% luck I would say. The luck will be what separates 1st from 1000th and 1000th from 10 000th, but what seperates 1st from 10 000th is mostly skill and good DTing. I've copped my own disappointments this year, but am yet to be ranked outside of the top 8000 and have clawed my way back up to 4000th, and still going strong, my trade this week will complete my team.
We were never even disagreeing with you to begin with, we always acknowledged it was a poor trade, you however were a combination of too stupid and too narrow minded, or maybe just didn't think it through enough, to recognise that trades that appear poor on face value can end up working out well, while trades that appear good on facevalue can end up poorly.
That, in itself, failure to recognise that things may end up differently to how they originally appear, in both dream team and I suppose real life, is what makes you a flowering noob.
noob.
hahahahaha this is funny to read haha
is fan footy the home of the 12 year old? oooooooh im a noob.....no no wait...im a flowering noob!!!! strong words....lol.
no im not obviously queer like a few of you...so no.....shower and flower do not represent to me what you "interpret" them to mean. like i said it sounds just a tad queer....
as for noob, what next a your mama!! or something. noob is a beginner right? somebody who knows nothing? surely you know the meaning dont you....if so....then why do i out rank you?
guess you must be the noob.....no wait the flowering noob!!!! how shower is that!!!!! lol
stooping purely to insults, classy. As for ranking, didn't you yourself just say that luck played an integral part in DT? Try a little consistency dude. And yeah bro, ff has had these automatic sensors implemented to make it a safer environment for all, little kids and adults combined.
No, it doesn't make us queer to make the obvious link of flower and shower, why else would I be f ucking saying them, because I really like showering? Us making the link between those and their actual meanings just indicates that we have intelligence that is at the very least average... which is more than can be said of you.
Enjoy your sh it house life with your retard level intelligence cow.
Oh, and just so I don't disappoint you
Yo mamma so nasty she has to creep up on bathwater. That being said, I still f ucked her last night, and I've got the say, the only difference between her and big foot is that big foot was a better root and didn't carry half as many venereal diseases.
Dosen't sound like too bad of an idea, i say try it!!
zip lock, your a joke, lol. ooooooh stooping to insults...but your the one that started with them.
lol...if you prefer mums.....i prefer 18 year old brunettes:)......but what ever does it for you mate, bit weird though. you obviously, have no standards if you still sleep with people like big foot and with veneral deseases. desperate much?
and yes dream team is luck, are you slow? can you comprehend? i said the same exact same team can get you 2200 one week, and 1800 the next. it all borders down to LUCK. maybe this week hodge gets tagged and gets a 50...unlucky for you. maybe mitchell cops it and he can roam free getting a 120...lucky for you. maybe this week...pendles, boyd, get injured. VERY lucky for those without them. horrendous for those with them. doesnt mean you started the week with a crap team.
also mr genius trade is made even worse by the fact he NEVER traded curnow, bewick to curnow would have been far better. it isnt even debatable. espicially seeing as how curnow will lose money 3 straight weeks. the supposed '"plan" of 3 premiums for 4 trades is a desperate play on words. if you start of with 14 premiums, trade goddard...you have 13. upgrade curnow (not with 100 k if you actually are getting a genuine premium) ..bring back goddard cheaper.....you only have 15 PREMIUMS.
so 3 trades to get ONE EXTRA premium, that you started with? lolololololololol yeah genuis.
now if you cant get that...your a "flowering" idiot as i cant explain it any clearer. and your al;so not funny in the slightest.....i expected better. but alas....go do your home work or something...you have proven you know nothing about dream team.
Back on topic please.
This was about trading out Swan.
I did it in round 7 and since then he has scored a ton just once - who else made the call?
My team will now be complete in round 14 when I trade back in a fully fit and firing Swan.