Had cox as VC. Decided not to take it as Swan is averaging 130. Anyone else in the same boat?
I don't have Swan and I kept Cox. Would have anyways though. Only Stanton or Watson would've taken the C from him and I have neither.
if i didnt have swan I would have kept Cox's score. But I am ranked pretty high overall and Considering Swan is averaging 130 (Cox scored 121) thought it would be a dumb move to take a score lower than Swan's average.
Fair enough. I'd feel safer taking Cox's score, but Swan's average against the Doggies last year was phenomenal.
will find out in a few hours if it was a smart move or not
swan 170 ;)
modify: 70 ;)
i was going to do the loophole but my phone registered the partial lockout as a full lockout >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
so i missed thompson too
i took cox vc, EASYYYYYYYY
same...and given the scores so far this round, thank goodness I did !
121 as captain is always acceptable, you're being greedy otherwise. Perfect use of the loop-hole taking a guaranteed 121 instead of rolling the dice with someone else (ie. Swan who scored 104 last week). I'd take 121 from my captain every week.
Coxy you star!!!
Loophole you ripper!!!