Hey guys.
To make things clearer, when you post your score so far out of how many players, COUNT YOU CAPTAIN AS 2!
For example, this week I'm 1112/12. Although I've only had 11 different players play (and have 11 remaining), my captain has played so I've had 12 play. Contrary to this, if I have 10 remaining players but one of them is my captain, I would say that I have 11 remaining.
Essentially, you have 23 players and your captain counts as 2.
Just makes things simpler.
huh?
Quote from: Bluke on April 16, 2011, 08:06:24 PM
huh?
seeing as captain gets double score, when scores are posted, captain should count as two players. you get it ?
Nice thread LaHug 8)
Yep all good.
Should be made a sticky somewhere
Quote from: Bluke on April 16, 2011, 08:06:24 PM
huh?
When people post their running score as however many points out of however many players (e.g. 1112/11), some people don't count their captain in the "11" and some people do.
It's best to write "12" if your captain is one of the 11 you've played and "11" if he isn't.
Did I not make that clear enough?
Quote from: chrisuzz on April 16, 2011, 08:08:43 PM
Quote from: Bluke on April 16, 2011, 08:06:24 PM
huh?
seeing as captain gets double score, when scores are posted, captain should count as two players. you get it ?
Nice thread LaHug 8)
Thanks chrisuzz!
So to clear it up if for example if you have 5 players played, 1 captain swan and you are on 500. You say 500-6.
You essentially have 23 players. ;)
Quote from: Barlow 21 on April 16, 2011, 08:12:08 PM
So to clear it up if for example if you have 5 players played, 1 captain swan and you are on 500. You say 500-6.
You essentially have 23 players. ;)
Yep ;D
Thanks for helping clarify, everyone!
1170 - 11 C gee thats easy isnt putting a big C there rather than a cenario that needs to be told
Well fidou, I'm still actually confused by that. Are you saying that you've played 11 and one of those is your captain? Or are you saying you've played 10 but you've written 11 because of captain and you want to let us know that.
My way is not difficult and is always consistent.
its simple no C no capt but a C points to a C played
I figured that, but are you saying that your captain is counted as one or two?
Seriously, my way is simpler and takes little explanation.
lol no i get it. I just dont understand why we need a thread about it?
Because some people don't and it really grinds my gears
its a small point. But you dont 'essentially have 23 player'. You have one player who gets a bigger score. You have 22 scoring players, and for this reason i never count captain as two. I count him as one player with a big score...
I personally prefer what the AFL DT says..
As someone said above..
My team this round, 1375/13 (Capt. Played)..
You'll end up with 23 players otherwise, and sure it makes sense, except for the fact you dont have 23 players. Just seems a bit funny getting technical on the division, but technically your adding a player to your total.
Don't rebut and explain it to me, cos I get it. I just prefer the above description.
Just my two cents, thats all.
Lol. I'm well aware that you get it. Oh well, I guess some prefer one way and others prefers other ways...
A captain is one player with one score he never has nor ever will be counted as two players. You will still have your remaining players regardless of how well captain did.
For you to ask this is like saying, hey I have 22 players on field but because my captain has played I will pretend there is only 21 players on field and one of them does not count.
Better way of what you are asking is to say example: 660 score from 5 players(captain played).
Nuff said.
Quote from: Slap on April 16, 2011, 11:37:10 PM
I personally prefer what the AFL DT says..
As someone said above..
My team this round, 1375/13 (Capt. Played)..
You'll end up with 23 players otherwise, and sure it makes sense, except for the fact you dont have 23 players. Just seems a bit funny getting technical on the division, but technically your adding a player to your total.
Don't rebut and explain it to me, cos I get it. I just prefer the above description.
Just my two cents, thats all.
It was this way first and will be this way always :)
You confuse me when you end up with 23 players. (Not really, its just as confusing as saying 1234/11 (swan captain))
Clearly I'm wrong..... Sorry........... :( :-\
Quote from: LaHug on April 17, 2011, 01:51:16 AM
Clearly I'm wrong..... Sorry........... :( :-\
You're not wrong, just a different opinion thats all... that's allowed and even looked up to here as most people have the same core team/idea etc :D
Quote from: Slap on April 16, 2011, 11:37:10 PM
I personally prefer what the AFL DT says..
As someone said above..
My team this round, 1375/13 (Capt. Played)..
You'll end up with 23 players otherwise, and sure it makes sense, except for the fact you dont have 23 players. Just seems a bit funny getting technical on the division, but technically your adding a player to your total.
Don't rebut and explain it to me, cos I get it. I just prefer the above description.
Just my two cents, thats all.
+1 ;)
If you want to do it with saying 23 players. For it to work you will need everyone to go along with it and it just ain't gonna happen