Print Page - Are the breakevens correct?

Title: Are the breakevens correct?
Post by: ossie85 on April 24, 2010, 04:51:15 AM

Hey m0nty,

Just noticing that BEs have a round lag. I.e. round 3 score, should be round 4 score, etc. Can be a bit confusing!

Title: Re: BEs
Post by: Justin Bieber on April 24, 2010, 06:41:04 AM

Noticed it a few rounds ago but it was pretty obvious which scores are for which round if you follow along.

Thought i saw alot of guys falling in price last round when i looked at the breakevens calculated. Am i seeing things or were those prices correct? ???

Title: Re: BEs
Post by: m0nty on April 24, 2010, 08:30:21 AM

Are you talking about the Breakevens page? They all say R4 as far as I can see.

I've been having a few issues with caching on the site this week, maybe do a shift-reload.

Title: Re: BEs
Post by: Justin Bieber on April 24, 2010, 09:10:32 AM

All fixed now with the breakeven previews.

Cheers

Title: Re: BEs
Post by: ossie85 on April 27, 2010, 05:05:04 AM

Take this page for example....

http://www.fanfooty.com.au/game/newprices.php?id=3434

Ryan O'Keefe says Round 4 score of 111, and Round 5 BE of 116

He scored the 111 in round 5 not round 4....

No one else get this?

Title: Re: BEs
Post by: Justin Bieber on April 27, 2010, 05:54:25 AM

The previews are correct but the new B/E during the weekend seem to be what Ossie says.

Says round 4 score on these pages for the other matches for me to.

Title: Re: BEs
Post by: Alex7089 on April 27, 2010, 05:58:45 AM

Yeah the after game 'new prices & BE's' seem to be a week behind.

Title: Re: BEs
Post by: m0nty on April 27, 2010, 07:20:58 AM

Ah yes, just a mislabelled column.

Title: Re: BEs
Post by: HintT on April 27, 2010, 11:37:47 AM

So shouldn't it be relabelled so we know what it means? :D

Title: Re: BEs
Post by: m0nty on April 27, 2010, 11:57:15 AM

Yes, I have done that.

Title: Are the breakevens correct?
Post by: Griffo1982 on April 28, 2010, 02:06:37 AM

Have noticed a few differing Breakevens on the forum between Montys & tooserious.net mainly Chris Judds which is listed as -296 on fanfooty & has been quoted as being 70 on tooserious (cant confirm this because tooserious is blocked at work).

Was wondering if anyone can confirm if there is either a problem with the breakevens on fanfooty or tooserious.net.

Title: Re: Are the breakevens correct?
Post by: BratPack on April 28, 2010, 02:11:53 AM

Judd is listed as 70 for me, maybe you need to empty your cache

Title: Re: Are the breakevens correct?
Post by: Resch on April 28, 2010, 03:04:06 AM

Quote from: BratPack on April 28, 2010, 02:11:53 AM
Judd is listed as 70 for me, maybe you need to empty your cache

Yep, shows 70 for me too.

Title: Re: Are the breakevens correct?
Post by: tigertops on April 28, 2010, 03:42:10 AM

where are the breakevens on this site?
or is it just under the teams games on the front page.

Title: Re: Are the breakevens correct?
Post by: brent007 on April 28, 2010, 04:24:50 AM

None of the BEs work for me either. Everyone is in the -200s

Title: Re: Are the breakevens correct?
Post by: Prospector_1 on April 28, 2010, 05:08:09 AM

Quote from: BratPack on April 28, 2010, 02:11:53 AM
Judd is listed as 70 for me, maybe you need to empty your cache

m0nty says you can do this by holding the "shift" key and clicking to reload the page.

FanFooty Forum

FanFooty => Feedback => Topic started by: ossie85 on April 24, 2010, 04:51:15 AM