Ok all - who's being chopped out and for who?
ANB to anyone that's actually a premium.
Quote from: PowerBug on April 30, 2017, 09:27:58 PM
ANB to anyone that's actually a premium.
+1 although his B/e is still 40 so will decide later in week when teams announced.
If Myers is named I will go Parfitt>Myers and maybe Houston>McNiece in a double downgrade. It will set me up for the byes in a couple weeks a little better considering I have Ryder, Houston, Touk and Eddy. I could also go Eddy>McNiece but it gives me 0 cash and doesn't help my upgrades in a fortnight. 307k and play Otten at F6.
I'll probably do something like
Watson to Myers (M8)
Pickett to Heeney (Butler to forward bench)
If Nankervis gets suspended he'll factor in
ANB - TMitch
Nank - Roberton (via DPP)
Only if Nank is suspended of course.
ANB out, otten forward and Roberton in.
SPP out, Sloane in.
Gonna hold ANB, at least I know he can score decently most of the time.
Parfitt -> Myers if named via Barrett.
Then second one stumps me a bit. Don't want to sideways premiums but Aaron Hall is going to start bleeding cash and has the bye in 2 weeks. Could sideways to Steven but Heeney and Hibberd both look attractive for a Houston swap. Desicions to be made.
ANB is shot. 31 was piss poor and cost me my league game. That and watsons 48... Thats about 110-120 points. Them two are gone for me. Watson look shot, slow and doesnt look like he wants to be out there.
Watson - Merret. ANB- Myers if selected...
Quote from: TomK on April 30, 2017, 09:58:39 PM
ANB - TMitch
Nank - Roberton (via DPP)
Only if Nank is suspended of course.
Probably a stupid questions but how do I do a DPP trade?
Quote from: georgekera11 on April 30, 2017, 10:46:48 PM
Probably a stupid questions but how do I do a DPP trade?
You have to go to advanced trades and then use the S icon to sub players into different positions.
Quote from: georgekera11 on April 30, 2017, 10:46:48 PM
Quote from: TomK on April 30, 2017, 09:58:39 PM
ANB - TMitch
Nank - Roberton (via DPP)
Only if Nank is suspended of course.
Probably a stupid questions but how do I do a DPP trade?
Not a stupid question mate, I spent flowering ages trying to figure it out when I started playing haha
You have to use "Advance Trades" on the menu bar just above your score/remaining trades.
Pick a player from your team on the left and then go from there
Eg select Nank (assume he is fwd), Otten, being a Fwd/def DPP will have an S next to his name, clicking the S moves him to the fwd line, you can now trade in a defender.
This works for any combination of DPP movements
Well if Nank is suspended, I'm going to have fix that unless Preuss gets a game, which seems unlikely.
Butler probably has to go and maybe ANB. Don't think he's going to get the same opportunities with Lewis back from suspension
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 30, 2017, 11:13:38 PM
Well if Nank is suspended, I'm going to have fix that unless Preuss gets a game, which seems unlikely.
Butler probably has to go and maybe ANB. Don't think he's going to get the same opportunities with Lewis back from suspension
He scored over 100 earlier in the season when Lewis played
Quote from: WhatMate on April 30, 2017, 11:15:51 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 30, 2017, 11:13:38 PM
Well if Nank is suspended, I'm going to have fix that unless Preuss gets a game, which seems unlikely.
Butler probably has to go and maybe ANB. Don't think he's going to get the same opportunities with Lewis back from suspension
He scored over 100 earlier in the season when Lewis played
and today was on 1 at half time. He was no where near the middle today so its clear his role has now changed. Hes going to be leaking a lot of cash with another score like that.. Plus cost you potrinally a league game and overall positioning..
Quote from: Ringo on April 30, 2017, 09:31:47 PM
Quote from: PowerBug on April 30, 2017, 09:27:58 PM
ANB to anyone that's actually a premium.
+1 although his B/e is still 40 so will decide later in week when teams announced.
It's 91 mate. Would of still been his B/e from last week. Updated now..
Quote from: WhatMate on April 30, 2017, 11:15:51 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 30, 2017, 11:13:38 PM
Well if Nank is suspended, I'm going to have fix that unless Preuss gets a game, which seems unlikely.
Butler probably has to go and maybe ANB. Don't think he's going to get the same opportunities with Lewis back from suspension
He scored over 100 earlier in the season when Lewis played
Yeah, fair point. His BE is 91 though and he was only ever a stepping stone.
Quote from: The_Captain on April 30, 2017, 11:19:37 PM
Quote from: WhatMate on April 30, 2017, 11:15:51 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 30, 2017, 11:13:38 PM
Well if Nank is suspended, I'm going to have fix that unless Preuss gets a game, which seems unlikely.
Butler probably has to go and maybe ANB. Don't think he's going to get the same opportunities with Lewis back from suspension
He scored over 100 earlier in the season when Lewis played
and today was on 1 at half time. He was no where near the middle today so its clear his role has now changed. Hes going to be leaking a lot of cash with another score like that.. Plus cost you potrinally a league game and overall positioning..
Ah, I didnt watch the game. Assumed he copped some sort of injury. Definitely hurt having Balic(91) and Horlin Smith (100) on the bench. Have bigger problems to fix up this week.
Yeah went balic and black over butler on field so was happy with that decision!
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 30, 2017, 11:13:38 PM
Well if Nank is suspended, I'm going to have fix that unless Preuss gets a game, which seems unlikely.
Butler probably has to go and maybe ANB. Don't think he's going to get the same opportunities with Lewis back from suspension
Remembered that I have Greene as well ::) So if Nank is suspended, I can't hide those 2 plus Eddy on the forwards bench. Will have to upgrade Nank or Preuss to Grundy. ANB will probably survive for another week.
Up until this week I've felt like its been pretty straight forward as to who I should bring in each week.
Roughy to Myers via DPP (if named)
Not sure on the second trade at this point.
- Will have to wait and see what happens with the Nank/Pruess situation.
- Also still stuck with O'meara, I know if I trade him out he'll go massive.
- Hampton, Houston, Butler, all starting to top out. I think they all can survive another week or two though.
- Neal-Bullin possible role change. Will give him another week or two. BE only 40.
Can basically bring anyone I want in.
- Grundy is obviously the prime target if I need to make a trade in the rucks.
- Wouldve probably brought in Sloane if he was at the same price as last week, but I'll wait for him to have an off game, which he usually does at some point (although it doesnt look like happening).
- At the moment I have brought Zerret which is a set and forget option.
- There is definitely value in Trealor at the moment, but he would be better to grab next week as we are looking at another potential price drop.
- Has the ship sailed for Loyd, Oliver and Roberton? Or chase the proven consistency of someone like Simpson or Riewoldt who are both undervalued?
- Or take a risk if Barrett is named (form is reserves? Cant find anything but he had a big game the other week) and bring him in for a quick cash rise and also have the availability to use his DPP
I've seen 40 twice and 90 once regarding ANBs Breakeven :P Certinaly makes a big difference as to whether to hold him for another week.
Quote from: PowerBug on May 01, 2017, 03:29:41 PM
I've seen 40 twice and 90 once regarding ANBs Breakeven :P Certinaly makes a big difference as to whether to hold him for another week.
It's definitely 91, that's straight from AFL Fantasy.
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 01, 2017, 04:23:32 PM
Quote from: PowerBug on May 01, 2017, 03:29:41 PM
I've seen 40 twice and 90 once regarding ANBs Breakeven :P Certinaly makes a big difference as to whether to hold him for another week.
It's definitely 91, that's straight from AFL Fantasy.
Can confirm 91
Now that MRP has done its thing who will be holding Nank or is he a gonna?
Anyone who has Greene would have to unload him?
Quote from: Thunderbolts on May 01, 2017, 06:47:18 PM
Now that MRP has done its thing who will be holding Nank or is he a gonna?
Anyone who has Greene would have to unload him?
I have both. Would prefer to keep both but can only do that if Preuss gets an unlikely call up :-\
Quote from: Ringo on May 01, 2017, 04:38:10 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 01, 2017, 04:23:32 PM
Quote from: PowerBug on May 01, 2017, 03:29:41 PM
I've seen 40 twice and 90 once regarding ANBs Breakeven :P Certinaly makes a big difference as to whether to hold him for another week.
It's definitely 91, that's straight from AFL Fantasy.
Can confirm 91
No idea where i got 40 from ???
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 01, 2017, 08:30:32 PM
Quote from: Thunderbolts on May 01, 2017, 06:47:18 PM
Now that MRP has done its thing who will be holding Nank or is he a gonna?
Anyone who has Greene would have to unload him?
I have both. Would prefer to keep both but can only do that if Preuss gets an unlikely call up :-\
That's gotta hurt, ive only got Nank but really hoping Pruess gets named. Will really suck if I have to drop Nank, as there is no reason to really offload him at this point :(
The rucks have been carnage the last two years >:(
Rucks: Martin, Nankervis (Preuss, Cameron) - Really do not want to upgrade Nankervis to Grundy if Cox is still around but also don't want to be copping a zero at my current rank. None of the others interest me.
Have ANB who is ready to go and also need to clean up some of my rookies. Ideally, one of the rookie rucks are named, and I will look at ANB/Parfitt to Myers/Balic (or Parsons if Myers not named). Build a bit of a bank to get some upgrades rolling again.
I'm wary of bringing in Grundy with Cox in the team, his scores do suffer by 10-20 ppg with him in the team i remember seeing. Taking the punt on BigBoy who's put up a decent few scores to make a little coin and put up similar points.
Quote from: Thunderbolts on May 01, 2017, 06:47:18 PM
Now that MRP has done its thing who will be holding Nank or is he a gonna?
Holding Nank. Around 50 BE (He's in my FWD, might be a different story if he was RUCK and I had no backup)
Currently he's my F3, but who knows, may keep him long term down to f6 if he maintains 90's average, save a trade.
Quote from: WhatMate on May 01, 2017, 02:53:54 PM
- Has the ship sailed for Loyd, Oliver and Roberton? Or chase the proven consistency of someone like Simpson or Riewoldt who are both undervalued?
Really regretting my initial choice of Mills over Lloyd... =/
I think Lloyd and Roberton will be fairly consistent for the rest of the season, gut feeling says Oliver will drop off mid season.
But it also brings in the question, is someone like Heath Shaw, who has dropped 122k, is less than 500k now. Is 70-90's gonna be what he gets all year or will he return to the guy that can pump out 100's. Worth keeping an eye on I guess.
Reiwoldt seems to always be a good option, most of his involvements are mark and kick +6, throw in a couple goals every game. Same with Simpson/Docherty, the rest of the blues defense are younger guys so I'm sure the seniors will still be involved in almost every switch and link in play out of defense for the blues.
Quote from: DBRiMatt on May 02, 2017, 04:42:14 PM
Quote from: WhatMate on May 01, 2017, 02:53:54 PM
- Has the ship sailed for Loyd, Oliver and Roberton? Or chase the proven consistency of someone like Simpson or Riewoldt who are both undervalued?
Really regretting my initial choice of Mills over Lloyd... =/
I think Lloyd and Roberton will be fairly consistent for the rest of the season, gut feeling says Oliver will drop off mid season.
But it also brings in the question, is someone like Heath Shaw, who has dropped 122k, is less than 500k now. Is 70-90's gonna be what he gets all year or will he return to the guy that can pump out 100's. Worth keeping an eye on I guess.
Reiwoldt seems to always be a good option, most of his involvements are mark and kick +6, throw in a couple goals every game. Same with Simpson/Docherty, the rest of the blues defense are younger guys so I'm sure the seniors will still be involved in almost every switch and link in play out of defense for the blues.
yeh I made the same mistake, had Loyd in my team right until before the first match and changed it to Mills. Luckily after the first game I swapped Mills to Zak Jones who has at least been serviceable and netted me around 70k so far.
At the moment Im actually leaning a bit more towards Simpson. Which would leave me 388k for next week which leaves me enough cash to potentially bring in anyone next week.
Anyone got Watson's BE?
So Beams out now as well as Nank and Toby. I'm in a real pickle now :(
So much for trading Jobe and Pickett :/
Nank and Beams to Heeney and Pendles
thinking ANB -> McEvoy through some DPP switching, Beams -> Steven
probably end up changing my mind
really dont want to hold jobe.... Like 48 points... wtf. But if beams is out what choice do i have. ANB needs to go firstly.
Quote from: The_Captain on May 03, 2017, 07:34:04 PM
really dont want to hold jobe.... Like 48 points... wtf. But if beams is out what choice do i have.
Parfitt>Balic is trade 1. ANB stays by the looks of things with Beams out. I was forced to hold WHE last round with Swallow out so hopefully something good can come of this too.
Fall just shy of Beams-Sloane although $720k is a lot of money to spend even if I did, not sure I would spend it all if I could. Could lock in Sloane if Myers is named though....
Might straight swap Beams with either Macrae/Lloyd/Roberton pending bench cover.
Given up trying, waiting until teams named!
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 03, 2017, 09:45:03 PM
Given up trying, waiting until teams named!
You don't like planning all week for the perfect trade only for it to be spat on come selection night? It's the best!
Quote from: Huttabito on May 03, 2017, 10:14:48 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 03, 2017, 09:45:03 PM
Given up trying, waiting until teams named!
You don't like planning all week for the perfect trade only for it to be spat on come selection night? It's the best!
They've already been spat on 3 times this week :'(
Now that Beams has decided to flower us, who should I get rid of out of the Hawthorn spuds, Roughy or Jaeger.. Leaning towards roughy, hes had his chance, surely Jaeger will finally deliver? :-\
Gonna cop the nank 0, ranked 10k and just going for league wins, hopefully other trades will better benefit my teams progression
Ok, couldn't help myself :P
Which ruckman is best to go with Martin at R1?
Grundy, 3 scores over 117 without Cox, 3 scores under 95 with Cox.
Big Boy, 3 scores over 100 without Vickery, 3 scores under 85 with Vickery (130k cheaper than Grundy, low BE)
Jacobs, can he keep it up,
Kreuzer, already missed a game with niggles
Someone else
Quote from: WhatMate on May 03, 2017, 10:52:26 PM
Now that Beams has decided to flower us, who should I get rid of out of the Hawthorn spuds, Roughy or Jaeger.. Leaning towards roughy, hes had his chance, surely Jaeger will finally deliver? :-\
Gonna cop the nank 0, ranked 10k and just going for league wins, hopefully other trades will better benefit my teams progression
Really is a toss of the coin. Similar price, similar average, similar BE, similar need to be out of your team, similar unlikeliness to score well this week.
I can't split them.
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 03, 2017, 10:57:34 PM
Ok, couldn't help myself :P
Which ruckman is best to go with Martin at R1?
Grundy, 3 scores over 117 without Cox, 3 scores under 95 with Cox.
Big Boy, 3 scores over 100 without Vickery, 3 scores under 85 with Vickery (130k cheaper than Grundy, low BE)
Jacobs, can he keep it up,
Kreuzer, already missed a game with niggles
Someone else
Seriously too hard to pick, would you consider goldy if pruess aint named? Though chances are Pruess will be back at some point...
I feel like Grundy or Jacobs are the safest options, at least with the way the crows are going and with no competition for position you can feel quite comfortable with Jacobs
Quote from: WhatMate on May 03, 2017, 11:31:50 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 03, 2017, 10:57:34 PM
Ok, couldn't help myself :P
Which ruckman is best to go with Martin at R1?
Grundy, 3 scores over 117 without Cox, 3 scores under 95 with Cox.
Big Boy, 3 scores over 100 without Vickery, 3 scores under 85 with Vickery (130k cheaper than Grundy, low BE)
Jacobs, can he keep it up,
Kreuzer, already missed a game with niggles
Someone else
Seriously too hard to pick, would you consider goldy if pruess aint named? Though chances are Pruess will be back at some point...
I feel like Grundy or Jacobs are the safest options, at least with the way the crows are going and with no competition for position you can feel quite comfortable with Jacobs
Picking Grundy is gonna be so hard to do if Cox is named. If not, could be a no brainer.
Jacobs, whilst averaging 110 the last 5 rounds, his Rd1 (65) score was when he was up against Mumford. In the next 4 weeks, he has Goldstein, Ruckless Melbourne, S.Martin and Sandilands.
These rucks are doing my head in!
Quote from: Huttabito on May 03, 2017, 11:47:25 PM
Quote from: WhatMate on May 03, 2017, 11:31:50 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 03, 2017, 10:57:34 PM
Ok, couldn't help myself :P
Which ruckman is best to go with Martin at R1?
Grundy, 3 scores over 117 without Cox, 3 scores under 95 with Cox.
Big Boy, 3 scores over 100 without Vickery, 3 scores under 85 with Vickery (130k cheaper than Grundy, low BE)
Jacobs, can he keep it up,
Kreuzer, already missed a game with niggles
Someone else
Seriously too hard to pick, would you consider goldy if pruess aint named? Though chances are Pruess will be back at some point...
I feel like Grundy or Jacobs are the safest options, at least with the way the crows are going and with no competition for position you can feel quite comfortable with Jacobs
Picking Grundy is gonna be so hard to do if Cox is named. If not, could be a no brainer.
Jacobs, whilst averaging 110 the last 5 rounds, his Rd1 (65) score was when he was up against Mumford. In the next 4 weeks, he has Goldstein, Ruckless Melbourne, S.Martin and Sandilands.
These rucks are doing my head in!
tom boyd was suggested as an option on the afl fantasy website blog.. i couldnt do it myself but it might interest the crazy
Quote from: Huttabito on May 03, 2017, 11:47:25 PM
Quote from: WhatMate on May 03, 2017, 11:31:50 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 03, 2017, 10:57:34 PM
Ok, couldn't help myself :P
Which ruckman is best to go with Martin at R1?
Grundy, 3 scores over 117 without Cox, 3 scores under 95 with Cox.
Big Boy, 3 scores over 100 without Vickery, 3 scores under 85 with Vickery (130k cheaper than Grundy, low BE)
Jacobs, can he keep it up,
Kreuzer, already missed a game with niggles
Someone else
Seriously too hard to pick, would you consider goldy if pruess aint named? Though chances are Pruess will be back at some point...
I feel like Grundy or Jacobs are the safest options, at least with the way the crows are going and with no competition for position you can feel quite comfortable with Jacobs
Picking Grundy is gonna be so hard to do if Cox is named. If not, could be a no brainer.
Jacobs, whilst averaging 110 the last 5 rounds, his Rd1 (65) score was when he was up against Mumford. In the next 4 weeks, he has Goldstein, Ruckless Melbourne, S.Martin and Sandilands.
These rucks are doing my head in!
For me it's between Grundy and Jacobs. I've got Grundy and Martin now and pretty happy with that set up (after having Nank, then trading him to Spencer for that 1 awesome game! ).
I'm stuck choosing between Rocky, Sloane and Merrett... Feel like Sloane is due for a tag...
Thinking of these trades
Fisher to Brad Scheer and Beams to T Mitchell
Hampton to McNiece and Beams to Sloane.
QuoteI'm stuck choosing between Rocky, Sloane and Merrett... Feel like Sloane is due for a tag...
Be like me, get all 3! :P
I had Rocky from the start and was tossing up between Sloane and Merrett - tough call, Sloanes B/E is 89, very achievable, so it'll be a while, if at all he drops below 700k this season.
Merret has similar consistency with similar ceiling.
I was going to go Merrett over Sloane personally, but with the Beams Injury I changed my trades to bring in both.
Nank, Beams, and now Jobe out :/ only playing guys on my benches are down back too!
I'll probably go Jobe and Beams to Sloane and Myers, giving me Nank's donut up forward but luckily it's just for a week. $182k to spend next week on upgrading Butler or Newman.
Nank -> Sandi
Beams -> Yeo (For flexibility.)
Thoughts on this trade - Preuss to Soldo and Beams to Sloane.
Quote from: Ringo on May 04, 2017, 08:37:27 PM
Thoughts on this trade - Preuss to Soldo and Beams to Sloane.
I would do it Ringo as its something I'm also seriously considering....
Quote from: Ringo on May 04, 2017, 08:37:27 PM
Thoughts on this trade - Preuss to Soldo and Beams to Sloane.
Soldo would be good for cash generation but hard to see him getting another game after this weekend.
I could be wrong though.
I'm thinking Parfitt to Myers and Beams to Duncan.
That probably suits my structure the best and leaves me 86k. I can dump Preuss to some spud ruck next week to give me some more cash for upgrades the week after.
Myers and Grundy are the two coming in for me, just need to decide who goes out.
Thinking it might be a good chance to clear some deadwood and trade out Beams + Eddy or Greene + Pickett?
taking a 0 for nank, i cant justify wasting my progress when im sitting ok in my league.
So, beams to ablett and watson to heeney. Some cash to spare next week. Opp prob has a 0 anyway.
Parfitt-->Myers
Preuss-->Sauce Jacobs
1k left in the bank :P
Anyone with multiple outs holding one player? I've got Greene, Beams and Parfitt out. I'm considering holding Beams as he has scored well and trading Greene/Parfitt (who has to go anyway).
So my other option would be Parfitt to Parsons, Greene to Roberton via DPP leaving me a good amount of cash to build for another upgrade.
Or Greene to Parsons, Beams to one of Sloane/Rocky/Merrett.
One thing that concerns me is that they are going to re-evaluate Beams after the second game off...
Just thinking out loud...
Quote from: Dave085 on May 05, 2017, 02:20:08 AM
Anyone with multiple outs holding one player? I've got Greene, Beams and Parfitt out. I'm considering holding Beams as he has scored well and trading Greene/Parfitt (who has to go anyway).
So my other option would be Parfitt to Parsons, Greene to Roberton via DPP leaving me a good amount of cash to build for another upgrade.
Or Greene to Parsons, Beams to one of Sloane/Rocky/Merrett.
One thing that concerns me is that they are going to re-evaluate Beams after the second game off...
Just thinking out loud...
Beams a minimum 2 weeks so could be longer holding the like of nank is ok cos u know it's only a week but could be longer than 2 with a quad so it's a lot of money/points sitting on the bench
What are people's thoughts on jack Steven is 583k and we all know what he can do was his score last week a flash in the pan cos they played the Hawks or his he a decent mid option
Quote from: Dave085 on May 05, 2017, 02:20:08 AM
Anyone with multiple outs holding one player? I've got Greene, Beams and Parfitt out. I'm considering holding Beams as he has scored well and trading Greene/Parfitt (who has to go anyway).
So my other option would be Parfitt to Parsons, Greene to Roberton via DPP leaving me a good amount of cash to build for another upgrade.
Or Greene to Parsons, Beams to one of Sloane/Rocky/Merrett.
One thing that concerns me is that they are going to re-evaluate Beams after the second game off...
Just thinking out loud...
I have Nank, Greene and Beams. Definitely holding Nank and probably going to trade one of Beams or Greene. On one hand Beams has averaged 104.7 compared to Greene 87.7 so even allowing for the fact one is a mid and one a forward, Beams seems to be scoring better. On the other hand Beams is a
minimum 2 weeks whereas Greene will definitely back after 2 weeks.
Quote from: chief007 on May 05, 2017, 08:39:23 AM
What are people's thoughts on jack Steven is 583k and we all know what he can do was his score last week a flash in the pan cos they played the Hawks or his he a decent mid option
Personally I'm not convinced he can bounce back to his super scoring ways.
Look at fixture- Saints have lot of games at Etihad coning up
Played around with it and settled on Beams -> Myers and Nank -> McEvoy.
Big boy will be good cover, and I predict his price to rise a bit, don't trust any of the other ruckmen at the moment as I already have Stef. Why spend a fortune when Big Mac will do! ;D
Quote from: chief007 on May 05, 2017, 08:39:23 AM
What are people's thoughts on jack Steven is 583k and we all know what he can do was his score last week a flash in the pan cos they played the Hawks or his he a decent mid option
Wouldn't do it this week, let's see evidence of scoring before jumping on.
Quote from: Peter on May 05, 2017, 10:32:34 AM
Look at fixture- Saints have lot of games at Etihad coning up
That's why I started with him, 8 of the first 10 at Docklands. Got injured after 2 so jumped off :(
Watson to Myers
Beams to Pendles
Donut on the rucks ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
:'(
I need to work out if I want to cop the Nank Donut or bring in Grundy this week and with Cox playing, I'd rather not. I've been messed around with the rucks to much of late I don't want to be wasting another trade here and would like to improve my team overall.
My on field scores would be
Sloane + 0
vs
Grundy + Black
So I will lose some points this week but I will make it back quickly when I'm fielding Sloane over Grundy for a few weeks, plus make more cash from Nankervis when hes back. Decisions.....
Quote from: Peter on May 05, 2017, 10:32:34 AM
Look at fixture- Saints have lot of games at Etihad coning up
Brings into question Roberton. Thoughts on him keeping this up and being top 6 defender? Or bring in Simpson, but will he play all games this year?
Ugh torn between Sloane and Pendles in for Beams :/ is the 114k difference greater or lesser than the output differences?
advantages of myers over scheer? Obviously he has proven ok scoring potential, but I would think scheer would have a better crack at more games?
So I did something to get a stash of cash in the kitty with things drying up a bit
Beams to Myers
ANB to Roberton via Otten
Passing on Sloane for now
ANB -> Merrett
Parfitt -> Barrett
Is what I went with. Will get Myers next week along with a forward upgrade (Macrae unless I like what I see from Yeo tomorrow)
ended up doing ANB to Myers and Beams to Sloane. Benches an issue if late outs though.