240 from 2. Still undecided if I take Pendles VC score or punt on Danger/Rocky.
333/3, not a bad start. No VCs in this one.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 30, 2017, 11:37:29 PM
240 from 2. Still undecided if I take Pendles VC score or punt on Danger/Rocky.
Over 120 take it. Under 120 roll the dice. On 120 at this stage of the season? I'd probably roll the dice.
5/528
Adams, Treloar, WHE, Butler and Nankervis.
4/483 or 4/603 with Captain
Pendles, Treloar, WHE, Grundy
Undecided if I take Pendles VC score of 120, its a tough call.
485/5, Nank, Treloar, Rance, Howe, Butler
343/3 Nank Treloar and Adams
355/3 - pendles adams nank. pretty solid.
question - if i trade now after the game are they able to be reversed?
5/583 - Pendles, WHE, Nank, Treloar and Adams. Solid start
2/244
Pendles and Nank
528/5
Butler, Nank, Pendles, Adams, Treloar
451/4
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 30, 2017, 11:44:32 PM
355/3 - pendles adams nank. pretty solid.
question - if i trade now after the game are they able to be reversed?
If you trade now you CANNOT reverse.
Quote from: LordSneeze on March 30, 2017, 11:47:13 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 30, 2017, 11:44:32 PM
355/3 - pendles adams nank. pretty solid.
question - if i trade now after the game are they able to be reversed?
If you trade now you CANNOT reverse.
ty :)
617/6 Pendles VC 120 probably a little low to take, Howe, WHE, Rance, Nankervis and Butler back down to earth for 65 still reasonable.
675/6
Adams, Pendles, Trealor, WHE, Nank and Caddy.
No real complaints here, had the VC on Trealor so captain Danger is ready to rock and roll.
648/6
3/355 Adams, Pendlebury, Nank
4/407
Butler the only disappointment but 65 isnt bad for a rookie.
4/463
3/300
Adams, Nank, Butler
528/5
Butler, Nank, WHE, Adams, Treloar
2 rookies 1 mid and 2 prem
232/2 Nank and Treloar
6/650 Dahlhaus and JPK tonight. Need big games from Steele, McGrath, Higgins and low score from Danger
947/7 Bont captain loophole
1008/9
Captain hasn't played either 8)
436/4, just had Dahl tonight
784/7
446/4
924/9 hanners killing me.
Quote from: Ricochet on March 31, 2017, 01:02:14 PM
3/300
Adams, Nank, Butler
6/614 after Lloyd Dahl Macrae last night
Quote from: tommy10 on March 31, 2017, 06:03:07 PM
232/2 Nank and Treloar
621/6. JPK had a quite one esp 3rd qtr. Had also Lloyd, Dahl and Macrae
Quote from: Ringo on March 30, 2017, 11:54:32 PM
617/6 Pendles VC 120 probably a little low to take, Howe, WHE, Rance, Nankervis and Butler back down to earth for 65 still reasonable.
9/906 JPK with hopefully his lowest score of the season.
Quote from: Ringo on April 01, 2017, 11:55:13 AM
Quote from: Ringo on March 30, 2017, 11:54:32 PM
617/6 Pendles VC 120 probably a little low to take, Howe, WHE, Rance, Nankervis and Butler back down to earth for 65 still reasonable.
9/906 JPK with hopefully his lowest score of the season.
6/670 with JPK the only disappointment too. Pendles, Treloar, Grundy, WHE, JPK, Dahl. Most of the dodgy rookies still to come though.
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 30, 2017, 11:45:22 PM
528/5
Butler, Nank, Pendles, Adams, Treloar
811/8 now. JPK, Dahl, Macrae.
Macrae and Dahl did great, but JPK was disappointing. Hope it's his lowest score of the season.
What sort of chop shop are they running? SC scores just changed
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 01, 2017, 02:21:50 PM
What sort of chop shop are they running? SC scores just changed
I thought it was a bit odd when there was no scaling last night.
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 01, 2017, 02:21:50 PM
What sort of chop shop are they running? SC scores just changed
If they can't sort this crap out I'll be done.
How would you feel if you took a loophole option, come back the next day and find that the scores have changed drastically?
509 form 5. Pendles, Dahl, Hanners, Hoskin-Elliott and Macrae. If Hanners and Hoskin-Elliott had their scores swapped I would be happier.
Quote from: Mat0369 on April 01, 2017, 02:40:37 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 01, 2017, 02:21:50 PM
What sort of chop shop are they running? SC scores just changed
If they can't sort this crap out I'll be done.
How would you feel if you took a loophole option, come back the next day and find that the scores have changed drastically?
Agree- it's becoming a bit of a joke. Don't get me wrong SC is a far more accurate reflection of a game as opposed to DT but the mugs running it this year are testing this theory..
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 01, 2017, 02:21:50 PM
What sort of chop shop are they running? SC scores just changed
Which scores RD?
Quote from: Ricochet on April 01, 2017, 05:39:32 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 01, 2017, 02:21:50 PM
What sort of chop shop are they running? SC scores just changed
Which scores RD?
Dogs vs Swans scores changed around midday AESDT today
13/1159, shocking start!
1328/14 including Ottens 108 as emergency, only Marchbank and SPP as rookies to come.
16/1591
Danger (C), Sandi, Fyfe, Macmillan, SPP and Marchbank to come.
1069/11 Danger VC plus able to loophole Otten's 108 as long as Hibberd does not play
939 from 10. I'm still waiting for Steele's score to be further disappointed. I have Steele*, Strewart, Danger (C), SPS, Marchbank, Simmo, Doc, Gawn, Sandi, Fyfe, SPP and Houston/Hannan left.
Otten also on the bench. :-\
1451/15 presuming Steele scores 66 from FF. Danger (C), Higgins, Marchbank, , SPP, Docherty, Sandilands & Fyfe to go..
Would be happy to crack 2300
1367/15 with Danger, Fyfe (C), Goldy, Docherty, Sandi, SPP and Marchbank to come.
Been a really dreadful week.
(http://cdndata.bigfooty.com/2015/05/135034_41084e254c59421efe04bff82f9b2ae0.png)
1522/17, ready to quit, just a shower year already.
Danger (C), Marchbank, Sandi, Fyfe, and SPP to come.
Quote from: King_Robbo on April 01, 2017, 04:02:02 PM
Quote from: Mat0369 on April 01, 2017, 02:40:37 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 01, 2017, 02:21:50 PM
What sort of chop shop are they running? SC scores just changed
If they can't sort this crap out I'll be done.
How would you feel if you took a loophole option, come back the next day and find that the scores have changed drastically?
Agree- it's becoming a bit of a joke. Don't get me wrong SC is a far more accurate reflection of a game as opposed to DT but the mugs running it this year are testing this theory..
The scores are flowered...how Franklin only got 103 is beyond me...kicked two massive goals when points were up for grabs, should have been worth a lot.
13/1199
Heater has killed me, and Laird/Steele were unders
14/1330
Solid enough, reckon par will be 2200 this week.
14/1299
Feel a bit better reading through here. Lynch stinker hurts. Steele/Jones disappointing.
1004 from 11 when you add Steele's poor score in.
16/1407 horror round.
14/1291 tough round
C to come
1670/18 with Otten's score included.
Danger (C), Fyfe, Sandi and Marchbank to come
Hoping Danger can pull me out of this mess
14/1408. Danger C to come
1486/16 yuk!! Some low scores by Laird, Shaw, JPK, Steele. Havent included Otten's score so if Hibberd doesn't play I'll be 1594/17 with Danger C to come.
1514/15 with danger C to come
thank you Ward, Otten, Grundy making my team look good :)
15/1407 with Danger C
1502 / 16 take pendles Vc or roll danger?
1574/16 with Ottens 108 added in. Trusting Danger to go more than 120 today so not taking Pendles VC
Danger (c), Selwood, Marchbank, Fyfe, Sandi and SPP to come
16/1423 Danger C to come having a shocker
1474/15. Danger (C) and some dodginess to come. 2300 possible, but everybody has to play nice.
1342/14
Danger (C) Selwood, Fyfe, Higgins, Sandi, Marchbank, Pepper, Hannan. Could score anywhere between 2150>2350. Need the skipper to go huge.
15/1326 - wowful round after a promising start.
Thumbs Up - Grundy, WHE, Pendles, Beams
Thumbs Down - Bowes, Lynch, Shaw
Danger (C), Tuohy, Docherty, Sandi, Fyfe, SPP, Houston to come.
1537/16
Danger(C), Fyfe, marchbank, hrovat, Sandi, Powell-pepper, left
1563/17. Danger (c) Marchbank, Fyfe, Sandi and SPP left. Below par scores from Laird, Shaw and Steele.
before the start of the carlton vs mel match i was
1900/18 C played
No idea how im sitting this week with so many below par scores
1879/17 with Danger C looks like a very good score so far this week. Copped Shaw and Steele, but otherwise very happy so far.
looking at 2300
1950 with Fyfe, Ryder, SPP, Houston playing
2279 Pre Scaling.
If Sandi/Fyfe can find another 21 points between them life will be very good 8) (know it's unlikely though)
2366 pre scale. Should be a great score this week by the looks of it :D
Is this season over yet?
2307 pre scale
im only looking at 2250..ish
2062 with fyfe and pepper to be added
billings and steele not great this week. or kruezer or laird... or butler or hampton.... sc was never my strong point.
2241 all done.
2319
2134, it's puke worthy.
2290, 2270 R1, stoked with the start to this season ;D
Looks like
2100 = Poor Score
2100 - 2200 = SC Average
2200 - 2300 = FF Average
2300+ = Awesome Score
2303 all out. Reckon that should push me up the rankings a bit.
2378 good week :)
Quote from: Mat0369 on April 02, 2017, 08:41:56 PM
2134, it's puke worthy.
2145 for me. Goldy donut, shaw, hanners. Agree.
2248 after scoring 2247 last week lol
Heater the main culprit this week, with a few other poor performers
Quote from: shaker on April 02, 2017, 08:47:47 PM
2378 good week :)
Good work mate. In all my leagues it's the highest I've seen (and only one to beat me...)
Up the pointy end I reckon
2232 for me
Quote from: shaker on April 02, 2017, 08:47:47 PM
2378 good week :)
I see a 2377 so scaling might be needed
2167 let downs, Steele, McGrath, Laird and donut for Goldy.
I am struggling big time at the moment. Probably be around 25-30k after round 2. Last year was similar. Just need patience and good trading.
Port Freo scores on HS are slightly different to the green scores in SC
Reckon HS scores have been scaled and SC ones are not, even though green
Finished on 2221
Let downs were Shaw, Laird and JPK
Still pretty happy to crack 2200
2354...can't complain
Will probably join the herds of coaches who bring in murphy next week
2321.
Pretty happy. No trades last week and not sure if I will make any this week.
2150, better than last week. Correctional trade time so I can hopefully lift from here ::)
Just saw a 2426 in one of my leagues. Reckon that would come pretty close.
2323- very happy with the week.
Ticks- Doc, WHE, Danger C, Gawn, SPP, Otten, JOM, Nank and Marchbank
Crosses- Shaw and Steele (however not concerned with either, especially Steele after scoring 65 and only playing on the ball in the second half)
Quote from: Bully on April 02, 2017, 09:37:47 PM
Just saw a 2426 in one of my leagues. Reckon that would come pretty close.
That's massive! Must have gone deep in the forwards with Buddy, Dahl etc...
Quote from: King_Robbo on April 02, 2017, 09:43:53 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 02, 2017, 09:37:47 PM
Just saw a 2426 in one of my leagues. Reckon that would come pretty close.
That's massive! Must have gone deep in the forwards with Buddy, Dahl etc...
Nothing really special about the team just avoided all the bombs and had guys like Greene, Murphy, Witts, Bont, Docherty, Otten etc. Scaled down to 2424.
Yep my 2378 now 2375 SPP -2 and Sandi -1
How SPP was scaled down is beyond me, should have been scaled to over 100!
25 touches at 92%! 14 CP, 8 clearances (highest for Port), 1 goal, and only 3 clangers.
2183 after some poor scores by JPK, Shaw, Roughy, Laird, Steele, and Parfitt
2251 for me. Got 2nd higheat in one league - beaten by my mate who scored 2501 (got scaled down).
Grundy, Greene, Kelly (GWS), WHE, Adams, Danger (C), fyfe, Doch, Nank, Beams, Oliver, Dahl, Treloar, Lloyd (Syd) all tonned up
My 3 premo defenders:
Rd.1 : 372 combined
Rd.2 : 186 combined >:(
Quote from: TomK on April 02, 2017, 10:19:47 PM
How SPP was scaled down is beyond me, should have been scaled to over 100!
25 touches at 92%! 14 CP, 8 clearances (highest for Port), 1 goal, and only 3 clangers.
I agree but keep in mind that he was in a game where there was some pretty amazing performances and he did score quite heavily late in a big win.
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 10:31:05 PM
2251 for me. Got 2nd higheat in one league - beaten by my mate who scored 2501 (got scaled down).
Grundy, Greene, Kelly (GWS), WHE, Adams, Danger (C), fyfe, Doch, Nank, Beams, Oliver, Dahl, Treloar, Lloyd (Syd) all tonned up
And that was #1
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 11:20:18 PM
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 10:31:05 PM
2251 for me. Got 2nd higheat in one league - beaten by my mate who scored 2501 (got scaled down).
Grundy, Greene, Kelly (GWS), WHE, Adams, Danger (C), fyfe, Doch, Nank, Beams, Oliver, Dahl, Treloar, Lloyd (Syd) all tonned up
And that was #1
$1,000 coming his way! nice
Quote from: piesfan1989 on April 02, 2017, 11:21:25 PM
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 11:20:18 PM
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 10:31:05 PM
2251 for me. Got 2nd higheat in one league - beaten by my mate who scored 2501 (got scaled down).
Grundy, Greene, Kelly (GWS), WHE, Adams, Danger (C), fyfe, Doch, Nank, Beams, Oliver, Dahl, Treloar, Lloyd (Syd) all tonned up
And that was #1
$1,000 coming his way! nice
That's so good for your mate! It's funny though, I just had a quick browse through some of the tops teams and all have taken some big risks which after a couple of rounds are coming off but could easily go the other way. Ie Wines - I can't expect him to break out into uber premo this year but is averaging 120... Might average 105 this year?
JPK has his down games and most of the top teams have him at the moment...
Quote from: King_Robbo on April 02, 2017, 11:26:36 PM
Quote from: piesfan1989 on April 02, 2017, 11:21:25 PM
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 11:20:18 PM
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 10:31:05 PM
2251 for me. Got 2nd higheat in one league - beaten by my mate who scored 2501 (got scaled down).
Grundy, Greene, Kelly (GWS), WHE, Adams, Danger (C), fyfe, Doch, Nank, Beams, Oliver, Dahl, Treloar, Lloyd (Syd) all tonned up
And that was #1
$1,000 coming his way! nice
That's so good for your mate! It's funny though, I just had a quick browse through some of the tops teams and all have taken some big risks which after a couple of rounds are coming off but could easily go the other way. Ie Wines - I can't expect him to break out into uber premo this year but is averaging 120... Might average 105 this year?
JPK has his down games and most of the top teams have him at the moment...
Someone mentioned last week that the top team didn't have danger...that remains true for round 2.
Quote from: piesfan1989 on April 02, 2017, 11:34:21 PM
Quote from: King_Robbo on April 02, 2017, 11:26:36 PM
Quote from: piesfan1989 on April 02, 2017, 11:21:25 PM
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 11:20:18 PM
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 10:31:05 PM
2251 for me. Got 2nd higheat in one league - beaten by my mate who scored 2501 (got scaled down).
Grundy, Greene, Kelly (GWS), WHE, Adams, Danger (C), fyfe, Doch, Nank, Beams, Oliver, Dahl, Treloar, Lloyd (Syd) all tonned up
And that was #1
$1,000 coming his way! nice
That's so good for your mate! It's funny though, I just had a quick browse through some of the tops teams and all have taken some big risks which after a couple of rounds are coming off but could easily go the other way. Ie Wines - I can't expect him to break out into uber premo this year but is averaging 120... Might average 105 this year?
JPK has his down games and most of the top teams have him at the moment...
Someone mentioned last week that the top team didn't have danger...that remains true for round 2.
Thats interesting. Must have spent the extra cash wisely.
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 11:41:45 PM
Quote from: piesfan1989 on April 02, 2017, 11:34:21 PM
Quote from: King_Robbo on April 02, 2017, 11:26:36 PM
Quote from: piesfan1989 on April 02, 2017, 11:21:25 PM
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 11:20:18 PM
Quote from: Gavdroid on April 02, 2017, 10:31:05 PM
2251 for me. Got 2nd higheat in one league - beaten by my mate who scored 2501 (got scaled down).
Grundy, Greene, Kelly (GWS), WHE, Adams, Danger (C), fyfe, Doch, Nank, Beams, Oliver, Dahl, Treloar, Lloyd (Syd) all tonned up
And that was #1
$1,000 coming his way! nice
That's so good for your mate! It's funny though, I just had a quick browse through some of the tops teams and all have taken some big risks which after a couple of rounds are coming off but could easily go the other way. Ie Wines - I can't expect him to break out into uber premo this year but is averaging 120... Might average 105 this year?
JPK has his down games and most of the top teams have him at the moment...
Someone mentioned last week that the top team didn't have danger...that remains true for round 2.
Thats interesting. Must have spent the extra cash wisely.
Yep...the top team is full of players with high ceilings that all went bang this week, though...rphy, wines, greene, higgins etc
The first 5-6 rounds mean little for overall as long as you can consitently pull good scores and keep in touch.
Most of the early leaders are running very high risk strategies while historically breakouts can start strongly and then peeter off as the season goes on, with the odd one pushing on all year.
It all comes down to rookies, cash generation and building ateam that will overtae the MP bolters from the start of the year.
For example, Wines, Higgins, Lloyd, Murphy, Nank are unlikely to maintain, while hanners, kennedy, shaw, rance, simpson, ablett, cripps have all had an off game already.
2321 with no real risks (besides Witts who may well pay off). Pity I had a rougher first week (thanks Rance and rookies) or I' be in a great position early. Now to save trades while others burn them (although I'm tempted to cull Steele for WHE).
2145, big thanks to Shaw, SPS, Sandi, and Bowes.
Now to get WHE into my side, and mayhaps Butler as well
Quote from: LordSneeze on April 03, 2017, 12:12:04 AM
The first 5-6 rounds mean little for overall as long as you can consitently pull good scores and keep in touch.
Most of the early leaders are running very high risk strategies while historically breakouts can start strongly and then peeter off as the season goes on, with the odd one pushing on all year.
It all comes down to rookies, cash generation and building ateam that will overtae the MP bolters from the start of the year.
For example, Wines, Higgins, Lloyd, Murphy, Nank are unlikely to maintain, while hanners, kennedy, shaw, rance, simpson, ablett, cripps have all had an off game already.
Well summarised - of all these high risk high reward players, approx 50% will drop off and not be uber premos. Look at Zaharakis last year, started off on fire and then fell in a heap. Waite etc too from last year. Even Goldy - started off last year on fire, got injured and dropped where as Gawn was average for the first few rounds and then became a must have by seasons end..
Two rounds in mean nothing - as long as your premos are scoring well and you have the right rookies you're in the hunt.