Feel like this deserves it's own post because it's questioned quite heavily. That and i can't remember the last thread it was asked in :P
(http://i64.tinypic.com/25zi2r4.png)
Was kinda hoping it was a bit more to it than that, but there you go
Also this on some questionable ones
Champion Data AFL â€@championdata
@FootyProphet Z.Merrett 42% forward, Montagna 37%, Sheed 35%.
Griffen 32% defence.
Nice to know man. So 35% is the magic number
So basically, Joey lines up at CHF and then charges into the square but because he started there it counts as forward
Seems a little flawed, but at least they've given an explanation
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on December 16, 2015, 03:02:29 PM
Nice to know man. So 35% is the magic number
So basically, Joey lines up at CHF and then charges into the square but because he started there it counts as forward
Seems a little flawed, but at least they've given an explanation
Yeh thought it was a lot more detailed than that. But yeh that's why Barlow got it as well.
Also this
(http://i67.tinypic.com/dylp3k.png)
(http://i67.tinypic.com/30adrhk.png)
I guess that's something to keep in mind for the future.
Here's some other players
Newnes 22% defence
PHanley 26% defence
Ziebell 18%
KStevens 26%
Ah Chee 31%
LJetta 20% defence, 43% on wing
And this on the "Goal Assist" theory
(http://i65.tinypic.com/20ftc79.png)
Thanks Rico. Clears that up. Just need to convince coaches to start players in back or fwd or mid depending on our SC needs. Can you confirm this is not where they are named but where they line up?
(http://i64.tinypic.com/25zi2r4.png)
Missed the OP did ya Grazzy? :P
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on December 17, 2015, 11:15:07 AM
Missed the OP did ya Grazzy? :P
Think he was just answering crowls' question ;)
Wow great post ! i don't usually read twitter feeds ect so probably wouldn't have seen this otherwise, it's
nice to have a definitive answer rather than speculation on this, cheers Rico.
Quote from: Ricochet on December 16, 2015, 02:52:59 PM
Feel like this deserves it's own post because it's questioned quite heavily. That and i can't remember the last thread it was asked in :P
(http://i64.tinypic.com/25zi2r4.png)
Was kinda hoping it was a bit more to it than that, but there you go
Also this on some questionable ones
Champion Data AFL â€@championdata
@FootyProphet Z.Merrett 42% forward, Montagna 37%, Sheed 35%.
Griffen 32% defence.
Think they need to change it to 30% :)
This almost locks Bastinac in as Fwd/Mid.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on July 28, 2016, 05:45:48 PM
This almost locks Bastinac in as Fwd/Mid.
7 month bump just for irrelevant Bastinac? Hahaha nice one Torpy!
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on July 28, 2016, 07:08:03 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on July 28, 2016, 05:45:48 PM
This almost locks Bastinac in as Fwd/Mid.
7 month bump just for irrelevant Bastinac? Hahaha nice one Torpy!
Pretty sure he just read it after i reposted the link in worlds today mate
Im not a fan, to me where you win the ball surely is more important then where you line up.
If you start on the half forward flank run into the midfield then play there the game you are a midfielder in my eyes. If you line up on the wing but immediately drift forward get all of your ball close to the 50 or in the 50 and kick goals you are a forward.
Jack Gunston lines up in the forward 50 most of the game but drifts onto the wing. He is not a KPF like people think but a F/M
Quote from: Holz on July 29, 2016, 12:48:55 PM
Im not a fan, to me where you win the ball surely is more important then where you line up.
If you start on the half forward flank run into the midfield then play there the game you are a midfielder in my eyes. If you line up on the wing but immediately drift forward get all of your ball close to the 50 or in the 50 and kick goals you are a forward.
Jack Gunston lines up in the forward 50 most of the game but drifts onto the wing. He is not a KPF like people think but a F/M
I disagree man.
CHFs and HFs that work up the ground and receive the ball through the middle are still FWDs
Mids that run fwd hard are still mids
Mids that role defensively are still mids
Its not 100% but where they start is far more accurate
Quote from: Ricochet on July 29, 2016, 12:55:14 PM
Quote from: Holz on July 29, 2016, 12:48:55 PM
Im not a fan, to me where you win the ball surely is more important then where you line up.
If you start on the half forward flank run into the midfield then play there the game you are a midfielder in my eyes. If you line up on the wing but immediately drift forward get all of your ball close to the 50 or in the 50 and kick goals you are a forward.
Jack Gunston lines up in the forward 50 most of the game but drifts onto the wing. He is not a KPF like people think but a F/M
I disagree man.
CHFs and HFs that work up the ground and receive the ball through the middle are still FWDs
Mids that run fwd hard are still mids
Mids that role defensively are still mids
Its not 100% but where they start is far more accurate
Are we talking about different things though.
Monty lined up at half forward sprinted into the mid and picked up all his ball there. If you line up in the forward line but 80% of what you do is what every other mid does that what are you really.
Quote from: Holz on July 29, 2016, 12:59:38 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on July 29, 2016, 12:55:14 PM
Quote from: Holz on July 29, 2016, 12:48:55 PM
Im not a fan, to me where you win the ball surely is more important then where you line up.
If you start on the half forward flank run into the midfield then play there the game you are a midfielder in my eyes. If you line up on the wing but immediately drift forward get all of your ball close to the 50 or in the 50 and kick goals you are a forward.
Jack Gunston lines up in the forward 50 most of the game but drifts onto the wing. He is not a KPF like people think but a F/M
I disagree man.
CHFs and HFs that work up the ground and receive the ball through the middle are still FWDs
Mids that run fwd hard are still mids
Mids that role defensively are still mids
Its not 100% but where they start is far more accurate
Are we talking about different things though.
Monty lined up at half forward sprinted into the mid and picked up all his ball there. If you line up in the forward line but 80% of what you do is what every other mid does that what are you really.
You're still classed as a half fwd.
If not then all lead up fwds from half forward (including CHFs) will be mid only or mid/fwds which isnt right
So I also found out the other day that they include Finals when determining positions.
Quote from: Ricochet on November 18, 2016, 11:35:47 AM
So I also found out the other day that they include Finals when determining positions.
I was hoping that would be the case (Picken FWD DPP for WXV I hope!)
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on November 18, 2016, 11:46:54 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on November 18, 2016, 11:35:47 AM
So I also found out the other day that they include Finals when determining positions.
I was hoping that would be the case (Picken FWD DPP for WXV I hope!)
Jake Lloyd more chance of being a defender too ;)