Poll
Question:
?
Option 1: Pendlebury and Ziebell and 41 k
votes: 1
Option 2: Ebert and Ziebell and 68k
votes: 1
Option 3: Ebert and Bontempelli and 13 k
votes: 5
Option 4: Sheil and Dahlhouse and 3k
votes: 1
I am having a lot of trouble with this decision and wouldn't mind getting some others opinions. In terms of byes, options 3 and 4 and the best, then 2 and 1 is the worst
Current premiums are:
Lewis, Sloane, Barlow, JPK, Beams
Gray, Martin, Swan
I like Ebert & Bontempelli.
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 07, 2015, 11:59:12 AM
I like Ebert & Bontempelli.
Thanks for the input...Yeah this looks best on paper, particularly for the next month just means I may have to miss out one of Pendles/GAJ but odds are one of my current mids will get injured/suspended anyway
Roughly how much money are you playing with for the 2 trades??
Yeah I think Ebert having the Rd.13 bye puts him ahead with so few decent options in that category. Unlike SC, I think Ebert is almost on par with Pendles in DT/AF scoring and it won't be until the second half of the year we can seriously consider GAJ.
Yeah I may be looking too far ahead at this stage
Quote from: Capper on May 07, 2015, 02:44:30 PM
Roughly how much money are you playing with for the 2 trades??
Trading out Griff/Salem...have $1,055,300 to play with