FanFooty Forum

AFL fantasy competitions => General Supercoach => SC Strategy => Topic started by: sammy123 on February 26, 2015, 09:59:58 AM

Title: 5 premium defence?
Post by: sammy123 on February 26, 2015, 09:59:58 AM
anyone trying this stratergy? Just getting some ideas
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: Deadly6 on February 26, 2015, 10:58:19 AM
No Sammy, not trying it. With your history of elite ranking, are you?
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: Deadly6 on February 26, 2015, 11:27:21 AM
I guess to add to that, there seems to be too much uncertainty around who will be the premium defenders and will the gap be that big between the top 10?
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: RaisyDaisy on February 26, 2015, 11:51:54 AM
At this stage I am

It's all going to come down to what rookies and cheap options come available rd1 though. At the moment I, like most are assuming that there are not going to be any rookie defenders lining up rd1, possibly 1 or 2 if we are lucky but we would need them on the bench anyway

If that is the case then I will be loading up with 5 solid defenders. I will keep an eye on some of the mid price options during the NAB to see what their roles are and if they are going to be SC friendly too, so again things could change

Going with a light forward line allows me to stack my defence, mids and rucks, but again there's a lot of if's and maybe's at this stage

I think we will be able to answer this question with certainty in 2 weeks time
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: sammy123 on February 26, 2015, 12:34:24 PM
Yeah im looking at having

Simpson,shaw,dog,hurn,newnes

At this stage but would have to take a hit somewhere
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: LordSneeze on February 26, 2015, 01:39:54 PM
At this stage i have 6, but that is more for the structure incase the worst case scenario happens.

I have options for a 4 & 5 man premium defence.
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: meow meow on February 26, 2015, 06:02:55 PM
Going with 6 unless Billy lives up to his potential.
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: Keeper27 on February 27, 2015, 11:55:06 AM
Going 3 premo + Lumumba & Yeo
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: Grufflez on February 27, 2015, 07:00:13 PM
LOL
Merchants of panic.
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: T Dog on February 27, 2015, 08:16:06 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on February 27, 2015, 07:00:13 PM
LOL
Merchants of panic.

I saw them live at the Corner Hotel. Great night.  :)
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: YoungGun on March 01, 2015, 07:51:59 PM
i like it, personally going 5 + ibbo
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 01, 2015, 07:57:49 PM
Smith, Hibberd, Newnes, Lamumba, Ibbo, WhiteX, N Brown, Goddard
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: Gigantor on March 02, 2015, 01:02:35 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 01, 2015, 07:57:49 PM
Smith, Hibberd, Newnes, Lamumba, Ibbo, WhiteX, N Brown, Goddard
there is something written somewhere quoting Richardson saying Goddard definitely won't play in the early rounds
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: Woppa15 on March 02, 2015, 10:10:28 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on March 02, 2015, 01:02:35 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 01, 2015, 07:57:49 PM
Smith, Hibberd, Newnes, Lamumba, Ibbo, WhiteX, N Brown, Goddard
there is something written somewhere quoting Richardson saying Goddard definitely won't play in the early rounds

Or was he just giving the kid a public schlaking to see how he responds.....
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: sammy123 on March 07, 2015, 11:40:00 AM
He said goddard is a chance round 1 his preseason has been excellent
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: shaker on March 08, 2015, 01:35:04 PM
Think this 5 premo defence looks dodgy there seems to be players that are much cheaper that look like they can match dearer ones people are using
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: Hawker_08 on March 09, 2015, 06:46:10 PM
I have 4 + Pearce. Wondering who u guys think will ave most from def this year. Currently got Shaw, Enright and Birchall
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: DPC on March 13, 2015, 09:47:23 PM
Quote from: shaker on March 08, 2015, 01:35:04 PM
Think this 5 premo defence looks dodgy there seems to be players that are much cheaper that look like they can match dearer ones people are using

When you say much cheaper Shaker who do you have in mind?  All the so called premiums have potential risks but historically its very hard to pick cheap midpricers that will end up keepers even though we are dropping the hurdle rate this year.
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: GM on March 13, 2015, 10:36:58 PM
Quote from: shaker on March 08, 2015, 01:35:04 PM
Think this 5 premo defence looks dodgy there seems to be players that are much cheaper that look like they can match dearer ones people are using
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: shaker on March 14, 2015, 11:38:05 AM
Quote from: DPC on March 13, 2015, 09:47:23 PM
Quote from: shaker on March 08, 2015, 01:35:04 PM
Think this 5 premo defence looks dodgy there seems to be players that are much cheaper that look like they can match dearer ones people are using

When you say much cheaper Shaker who do you have in mind?  All the so called premiums have potential risks but historically its very hard to pick cheap midpricers that will end up keepers even though we are dropping the hurdle rate this year.

To start with it is pretty hard to call some of these guys people are using premos so players around $400k + that are being used at D4, 5,  think going with 3 of the best and couple between $250- 350K can save $200K + and rookies for the rest , you need at least one not playing to loophole so the backline seems to be the place , as for who are the cheaper guys are you just have to sift through the NAB results and take a punt and hopefully pick up a bargain like Jaensch last year  ;)
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: DPC on March 15, 2015, 11:37:18 PM
Quote from: shaker on March 14, 2015, 11:38:05 AM
Quote from: DPC on March 13, 2015, 09:47:23 PM
Quote from: shaker on March 08, 2015, 01:35:04 PM
Think this 5 premo defence looks dodgy there seems to be players that are much cheaper that look like they can match dearer ones people are using

When you say much cheaper Shaker who do you have in mind?  All the so called premiums have potential risks but historically its very hard to pick cheap midpricers that will end up keepers even though we are dropping the hurdle rate this year.

To start with it is pretty hard to call some of these guys people are using premos so players around $400k + that are being used at D4, 5,  think going with 3 of the best and couple between $250- 350K can save $200K + and rookies for the rest , you need at least one not playing to loophole so the backline seems to be the place , as for who are the cheaper guys are you just have to sift through the NAB results and take a punt and hopefully pick up a bargain like Jaensch last year  ;)

Jaensch was the only successful mid price ($275-$350k) defender in the last 2 years that was picked to start Rd 1 - by successful I mean played 19+ games and averaged 85+.  I'm not saying it can't be done but its a high risk strategy.
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: shaker on March 16, 2015, 09:22:24 AM
Quote from: DPC on March 15, 2015, 11:37:18 PM
Quote from: shaker on March 14, 2015, 11:38:05 AM
Quote from: DPC on March 13, 2015, 09:47:23 PM
Quote from: shaker on March 08, 2015, 01:35:04 PM
Think this 5 premo defence looks dodgy there seems to be players that are much cheaper that look like they can match dearer ones people are using

When you say much cheaper Shaker who do you have in mind?  All the so called premiums have potential risks but historically its very hard to pick cheap midpricers that will end up keepers even though we are dropping the hurdle rate this year.

To start with it is pretty hard to call some of these guys people are using premos so players around $400k + that are being used at D4, 5,  think going with 3 of the best and couple between $250- 350K can save $200K + and rookies for the rest , you need at least one not playing to loophole so the backline seems to be the place , as for who are the cheaper guys are you just have to sift through the NAB results and take a punt and hopefully pick up a bargain like Jaensch last year  ;)

Jaensch was the only successful mid price ($275-$350k) defender in the last 2 years that was picked to start Rd 1 - by successful I mean played 19+ games and averaged 85+.  I'm not saying it can't be done but its a high risk strategy.

That's why SC is so much fun people have different ways of setting up there teams you need to take a risk in one of your lines with a depleted backline this year that's the line for me , others are stacking there backline with some players that might only avg. 80-85 and running lots of rookies in there forwards and that's not high risk ?
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: PowerBug on March 18, 2015, 07:15:13 PM
Do you define Harbrow and Lumumba as premium? I would more use the term keeper than premium, in which case I would definitely be including those two.
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: RaisyDaisy on March 18, 2015, 08:32:33 PM
Quote from: PowerBug on March 18, 2015, 07:15:13 PM
Do you define Harbrow and Lumumba as premium? I would more use the term keeper than premium, in which case I would definitely be including those two.

I think when we talk about defence in particular this year, "keeper" is the right term

Most of us assume that Eski, Simpson, Heater and a few others are the premiums of defence, but there are so many players who could potentially go 90+ and be keepers
Title: Re: 5 premium defence?
Post by: shaker on March 19, 2015, 02:02:06 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 18, 2015, 08:32:33 PM
Quote from: PowerBug on March 18, 2015, 07:15:13 PM
Do you define Harbrow and Lumumba as premium? I would more use the term keeper than premium, in which case I would definitely be including those two.

I think when we talk about defence in particular this year, "keeper" is the right term

Most of us assume that Eski, Simpson, Heater and a few others are the premiums of defence, but there are so many players who could potentially go 90+ and be keepers

Agree compared to last year there is only 5 or 6 you could call premos and that might be stretching it