Im powering through the last round slowly, so i apologies for that.
Swedish Metal at English Lions
Swiss Storm at Spanish Stallions
Croatian Crushers at Hungarian Hulks
Belarus Bison at Russian Roulettes
Serbian Eagles at Svalbard Valkyries
Iceland Polar Bears at Greek Titans
Macedonian Wolves at Belgian Bashers
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1i6tHsoCoO-DT3kIpm1a5u9mS13pHR6pgIMphqAhtpaI/edit#gid=0 (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1i6tHsoCoO-DT3kIpm1a5u9mS13pHR6pgIMphqAhtpaI/edit#gid=0)
Swiss Storm
Cale Hooker, Michael Hurley, Alex Rance, Jarryn Geary
Ollie Wines (evc), Dion Prestia, Clayton Oliver (c), David Mundy
Jarrod Witts
Luke Dahlhaus (vc), Travis Colyer, Tom Hawkins, Toby McLean
Shaun Grigg, Reece Conca
Matt Rosa, Brandon Matera, Tom Barrass
Spanish Stallions
Def: S Docherty, J Johannisen, T McDonald, L Plowman
Mid: D Heppell, L Neale, B Acres, J OMeara
Ruck: D Lang (OOP)
Fwd: J Macrae, D Parish, L Jong, T Miller
Utility: L Taylor, D Rich
Emg: M Kennedy, P Wright, M Baguley, J Melksham
Croatia Crushers
Def: Dylan Roberton,Jeremy McGovern,Jamie MacMillan,Callum Mills
Mids: Rory Sloane(C),Joel Selwood(VC),Tom Liberatore,Connor Blakely
Ruck: Tom Campbell
Fwd: Tom T Lynch,Mav Weller,Orazio Fantasia,Brandon Parfitt
U: Sam Gray,Dom Sheed
E: George Hewett,Harley Balic,Brad Sheppard
Iceland Polar Bears
Backs: M. Suckling, J. Harbrow, A. Mackie, L. Henderson
Mids: Z. Merrett (C), M. Duncan (VC), N. Fyfe, D. Tyson
Ruck: S. Mumford
Fwds: N. Riewoldt, J. Westhoff, I. Heeney, J. Sicily
Int: L. Picken, K. Amon
Emg: A. Young, C. Sinclair, H. Grundy, T. Sheridan
OUT: H. Grundy, D. Swallow
IN: L. Henderson, K. Amon
Serbian Eagles
D: Kade Simpson, Heath Shaw, Michael Hibberd, Robbie Tarrant
M: Dustin Martin (c), Scott Pendlebury (vc), Jobe Watson, Luke Parker
R: Aaron Sandilands
F: Richard Douglas, Jarryd Roughead, Jack Silvagni, Cam McCarthy
I: Sam Mitchell, Daniel Wells
E: Mitch Robinson, Jack Viney, Eric Hipwood
Russian Roulettes
D: Montagna (evc), Hodge, Burgoyne, Z.Jones
M: Ablett (c), Bontempelli (vc), R.Gray, Zorko
R: Kreuzer
F: Greene, Motlop, Petracca, Greenwood
U: Tippett, Harmes
Emerg: Cutler(d), Mayes(d), RClarke (f)
Bashers
Backs: J.Lloyd, B.Houli, H.Hartlett, B.Smith
Mids: P.Dangerfield (vc), M.Priddis, B.Gibbs, T.Cotchin
Ruck: S.Jacobs
Fwds: L.Franklin (c), E.Yeo, M.LeCras, M.Walters
Utilities: M.Crouch, J.Lyons
Emergencies: N.Vlastuin, J.Redden, N.Hrovat
England
Def: Jeremy Howe, Robert Murphy, Zach Tuohy, Caleb Marchbank
Mid: Dayne Beams (VC), Tom Mitchell (C), Jack Steven, Luke Shuey
Ruck: Patrick Ryder
Fwd: Taylor Walker, Josh Dunkley, Joe Daniher, Charlie Dixon
Int: Nathan Jones, Brendon Goddard
Emg: David Zaharakis, Zac Smith, Easton Wood
Quote from: Rids on April 28, 2017, 01:11:01 PM
Russian Roulettes
D: Montagna (evc), Hodge, Burgoyne, Z.Jones
M: Ablett (c), Bontempelli (vc), R.Gray, Zorko
R: Kreuzer
F: Greene, Motlop, Petracca, Greenwood
U: Tippett, Howlett
Emerg: Cutler(d), Mayes(d), RClarke (f)
Harmes out
Howlett in
After having nearly every player simultaneously sh it the bed last week (exceptions go to Laird, McDonald, Lynch and Cunnington, everyone else can be ashamed), hopefully we can put up a reasonable performance this week. flowering plebs
B: Laird, Adams (C), Luke McDonald, Haynes
M: Ziebell, Gaff, Kelly (VC), Cunnington
R: Gies
F: Hoskin-Elliott, J Watts, TJ Lunch, Higgins
U: Ward, Hunter
E: S Johnson (F), Bugg (M), Hurn (B), C Smith (OOP R)
Quote from: Ziplock on April 28, 2017, 06:29:14 PM
After having nearly every player simultaneously sh it the bed last week (exceptions go to Laird, McDonald, Lynch and Cunnington, everyone else can be ashamed), hopefully we can put up a reasonable performance this week. flowering plebs
B: Laird, Adams (C), Luke McDonald, Haynes
M: Ziebell, Gaff, Josh Kelly (VC), Cunnington
R: Giles
F: Hoskin-Elliott, J Watts, TJ Lynch, Higgins
U: Ward, Hunter
E: S Johnson (F), Bugg (M), Hurn (B), C Smith (OOP R)
BISON
Def: H Crozier, J Smith, J Hunt, J Lever
Mid: A Treloar (C), D Tyson, N Graham, S Powell-Pepper
Ruc: B Grundy (VC)
Fwd: T Membrey, J Darling, L Weller, A Fasolo
Uti: J Simpkin, T Nankervis
Emg: O McDonald (Def), D Tucker (Mid), H McCluggage (Fwd)
Swedish Metal
DEF: Marcus Adams, Andrew McGrath, Matthew Broadbent, Daniel Howe
MID: Aaron Hall (VC), Patrick Cripps, Trent Dumont, Mark Blicavs
RUC: Tom Bellchambers
FWD: Jeremy Cameron (C), Alex Neal-Bullen, Brad Hill, Jack Riewoldt
UTL: Jacob Hopper, Harry Cunningham
EMG: Travis Varcoe (F), Alex Sexton (M), Martin Gleeson (D), Callum Ah Chee (OOP R)
Sorry guys, tried logging on earlier but there were server issues apparently. I'll try and get this done on Thursday nights from now seeing as I'm really busy this year.
I gather Z.Williams and Shiel are locked in from last week.
B: Z.Williams, Vince, K.Kolodjashnij, Newman
M: Shiel, Murphy(VC), Shiels, Ebert
R: Martin (C)
F: Gunston, Breust, Wingard, Burton
U: Menegola, B.Crouch
E: S.Gibson (M), J.Gibson (B), Puopolo (F), A.Smith (R)
Yeah same here Scrads. Couldn't get on, we left it too late. Anyway my squad has no depth so I'm unchanged from last week regardless do not a big deal.
Sadly don't think they're locked in Scrads :(.
Options are you name a team without them in it if after deadline or go with the team from last week to include them.
But seeing as most of the games have been played now, not sure if that decision can be made at this point, so will leave it for Holz to decide what to do.
If an OOP score is the lowest score for the home team, is that player's raw or halved score the HGA? Applies to the Stallions this week.
Quote from: Nige on May 01, 2017, 12:34:15 PM
If an OOP score is the lowest score for the home team, is that player's raw or halved score the HGA? Applies to the Stallions this week.
I'm pretty sure I read that in EXV it is the lowest raw score that gets added to the HGA.
1317 but will it be enough??
Quote from: Atto on May 01, 2017, 12:47:37 PM
Quote from: Nige on May 01, 2017, 12:34:15 PM
If an OOP score is the lowest score for the home team, is that player's raw or halved score the HGA? Applies to the Stallions this week.
I'm pretty sure I read that in EXV it is the lowest raw score that gets added to the HGA.
That's what I thought, cheers.
Quote from: Nige on May 01, 2017, 02:06:10 PM
Quote from: Atto on May 01, 2017, 12:47:37 PM
Quote from: Nige on May 01, 2017, 12:34:15 PM
If an OOP score is the lowest score for the home team, is that player's raw or halved score the HGA? Applies to the Stallions this week.
I'm pretty sure I read that in EXV it is the lowest raw score that gets added to the HGA.
That's what I thought, cheers.
just confirming it is the lowest raw score. so if a guy goes 50 and your OOP goes 80 down to 40. The HGA is 50.
Quote from: Holz on May 01, 2017, 02:27:04 PM
Quote from: Nige on May 01, 2017, 02:06:10 PM
Quote from: Atto on May 01, 2017, 12:47:37 PM
Quote from: Nige on May 01, 2017, 12:34:15 PM
If an OOP score is the lowest score for the home team, is that player's raw or halved score the HGA? Applies to the Stallions this week.
I'm pretty sure I read that in EXV it is the lowest raw score that gets added to the HGA.
That's what I thought, cheers.
just confirming it is the lowest raw score. so if a guy goes 50 and your OOP goes 80 down to 40. The HGA is 50.
But what if your OOP goes 40 down to 20 and nobody did worse than 40 (next lowest was 50, for example)? Do you get 50 or 40 or 20?
In this instance, it was Darcy Parish's 47 that was the lowest score, which became 24 once halved for OOP as Spink named him forward for some reason. So I figured that the 47 itself would be the HGA.
If someone doesn't post a team they get last weeks team correct?
Quote from: LF on May 01, 2017, 04:44:09 PM
If someone doesn't post a team they get last weeks team correct?
yes
Quote from: Hellopplz on April 30, 2017, 03:06:38 AM
Sadly don't think they're locked in Scrads :(.
Options are you name a team without them in it if after deadline or go with the team from last week to include them.
But seeing as most of the games have been played now, not sure if that decision can be made at this point, so will leave it for Holz to decide what to do.
Holz - what are we doing here? I named my team after the Friday night game and treated the players I had play from my side the previous week as locked in. Only players in question are Zac Williams and Dylan Shiel. I think it's clear they are set in my best side. Shiel wasn't great, so if I was trying to rort the system I probably would have chanced someone beating him.
Quote from: Scrads on May 01, 2017, 11:01:37 PM
Quote from: Hellopplz on April 30, 2017, 03:06:38 AM
Sadly don't think they're locked in Scrads :(.
Options are you name a team without them in it if after deadline or go with the team from last week to include them.
But seeing as most of the games have been played now, not sure if that decision can be made at this point, so will leave it for Holz to decide what to do.
Holz - what are we doing here? I named my team after the Friday night game and treated the players I had play from my side the previous week as locked in. Only players in question are Zac Williams and Dylan Shiel. I think it's clear they are set in my best side. Shiel wasn't great, so if I was trying to rort the system I probably would have chanced someone beating him.
This will probably be an unpopular decision but i always go with what is the rational solution.
quite clear to me that Shiel and Zac where always going to be picked so have no issues with the team as it stands. Its a clear mistake and no advantage is gained.
If fringe players where involved and emergencies then I would not let them play.
I'm fine with that too!
We should probably make sure there are a clearly defined set of rules somewhere for these situations in future so people can just check them instead of asking here and waiting for a reply.
Quote from: LaHug on May 02, 2017, 10:22:00 AM
I'm fine with that too!
We should probably make sure there are a clearly defined set of rules somewhere for these situations in future so people can just check them instead of asking here and waiting for a reply.
agreed only issue is if i post a set of rules people will be unhappy with that mid season.
the rules I think they should be is that people who miss are not punished harshly but in no way gain an advantage.
1. If you forgot to name a team then you get the same team as last week. if You have the captain and vic captain not play then the next highest playing averaging player is auto captain.
2. If you forgot to name a team on Friday night then players are locked in (ON FIELD) from last week. This means there can be no funny business. if players where VC or C last week then they lose that and a new VC and C must be named. This also means if they dont play then they are locked onto your field.
3. If you fail to name a bench then It will be based on last week.
4. If you end up not having a player to fill a position. i.e. only 14 of the 18 play either through mass late outs or having a team from last week then the highest averaging player will come at 50% score regardless of what position they are from.
any issues with that?
Quote from: Holz on May 02, 2017, 10:15:51 AM
Quote from: Scrads on May 01, 2017, 11:01:37 PM
Quote from: Hellopplz on April 30, 2017, 03:06:38 AM
Sadly don't think they're locked in Scrads :(.
Options are you name a team without them in it if after deadline or go with the team from last week to include them.
But seeing as most of the games have been played now, not sure if that decision can be made at this point, so will leave it for Holz to decide what to do.
Holz - what are we doing here? I named my team after the Friday night game and treated the players I had play from my side the previous week as locked in. Only players in question are Zac Williams and Dylan Shiel. I think it's clear they are set in my best side. Shiel wasn't great, so if I was trying to rort the system I probably would have chanced someone beating him.
This will probably be an unpopular decision but i always go with what is the rational solution.
quite clear to me that Shiel and Zac where always going to be picked so have no issues with the team as it stands. Its a clear mistake and no advantage is gained.
If fringe players where involved and emergencies then I would not let them play.
ok sorry to be annoying but going to have to reverse this.
in the past people have taken the team from last week or named a team without these players. It seems highly unfair that 1 team gets the advatnage of retrospective rules and others do not.
The new rules will be posted in the rules thread and in the round thread for this week.
So the new rules will be in action going forward.
Quote from: Holz on May 02, 2017, 10:59:07 AM
Quote from: Holz on May 02, 2017, 10:15:51 AM
Quote from: Scrads on May 01, 2017, 11:01:37 PM
Quote from: Hellopplz on April 30, 2017, 03:06:38 AM
Sadly don't think they're locked in Scrads :(.
Options are you name a team without them in it if after deadline or go with the team from last week to include them.
But seeing as most of the games have been played now, not sure if that decision can be made at this point, so will leave it for Holz to decide what to do.
Holz - what are we doing here? I named my team after the Friday night game and treated the players I had play from my side the previous week as locked in. Only players in question are Zac Williams and Dylan Shiel. I think it's clear they are set in my best side. Shiel wasn't great, so if I was trying to rort the system I probably would have chanced someone beating him.
This will probably be an unpopular decision but i always go with what is the rational solution.
quite clear to me that Shiel and Zac where always going to be picked so have no issues with the team as it stands. Its a clear mistake and no advantage is gained.
If fringe players where involved and emergencies then I would not let them play.
ok sorry to be annoying but going to have to reverse this.
in the past people have taken the team from last week or named a team without these players. It seems highly unfair that 1 team gets the advatnage of retrospective rules and others do not.
The new rules will be posted in the rules thread and in the round thread for this week.
So the new rules will be in action going forward.
No problems, so what are we doing in regards to my team this week? Last week's team?
Yep, fairly sure if you forget to name a team, it's the team from last week (which was the one from the previous week).
valkyries scored 1561 ftr :)
Hi - Just a rule clarification, apologies if this is mentioned elsewhere.
On the spreadsheet I can see Darcy Parish in my forward line is listed as OOP, but he recently gained Fwd status in AF. Is he listed as OOP because we don't use the position changes mid season?
Don't really mind either way - I have fwds playing as my utility players, so could easily have moved Parish back to the mids, but just need to know for future reference.
Quote from: Spinking on May 04, 2017, 06:02:58 PM
Hi - Just a rule clarification, apologies if this is mentioned elsewhere.
On the spreadsheet I can see Darcy Parish in my forward line is listed as OOP, but he recently gained Fwd status in AF. Is he listed as OOP because we don't use the position changes mid season?
Don't really mind either way - I have fwds playing as my utility players, so could easily have moved Parish back to the mids, but just need to know for future reference.
we follow RDT not AF so no position changes during the season.
Are these round match up results finished yet? Russia scoring 0 currently for rd 4
Quote from: Rids on May 08, 2017, 01:34:26 PM
Are these round match up results finished yet? Russia scoring 0 currently for rd 4
Looking at the plebs on your list, sounds about right.
Quote from: Ziplock on May 09, 2017, 09:33:18 PM
Quote from: Rids on May 08, 2017, 01:34:26 PM
Are these round match up results finished yet? Russia scoring 0 currently for rd 4
Looking at the plebs on your list, sounds about right.
It was also the week one of those plebs was named captained and scored 162 ;)
Quote from: Rids on May 10, 2017, 12:27:19 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on May 09, 2017, 09:33:18 PM
Quote from: Rids on May 08, 2017, 01:34:26 PM
Are these round match up results finished yet? Russia scoring 0 currently for rd 4
Looking at the plebs on your list, sounds about right.
It was also the week one of those plebs was named captained and scored 162 ;)
and Tambling was taken at pick 4, random luck happens.
I am confused sorry. My enquiry is actually a genuine one. For some reason Russia is coming up with a 0 in the match-ups.
I posted the team in the thread as I thought was correct. Was I meant to post it in the spreadsheet as well? Was there a rule change that I have missed?
Quote from: Rids on May 11, 2017, 03:28:21 PM
I am confused sorry. My enquiry is actually a genuine one. For some reason Russia is coming up with a 0 in the match-ups.
I posted the team in the thread as I thought was correct. Was I meant to post it in the spreadsheet as well? Was there a rule change that I have missed?
It's coming up as 0 because nobody's input the list into the spreadsheet and put the numbers in yet. I think most coaches typically just do that themselves because it makes everyone's job easier. I've done it for the Bison most weeks and I'm sure others have for their teams. I don't know if it's an actual requirement though.
Quote from: LaHug on May 11, 2017, 03:35:12 PM
Quote from: Rids on May 11, 2017, 03:28:21 PM
I am confused sorry. My enquiry is actually a genuine one. For some reason Russia is coming up with a 0 in the match-ups.
I posted the team in the thread as I thought was correct. Was I meant to post it in the spreadsheet as well? Was there a rule change that I have missed?
It's coming up as 0 because nobody's input the list into the spreadsheet and put the numbers in yet. I think most coaches typically just do that themselves because it makes everyone's job easier. I've done it for the Bison most weeks and I'm sure others have for their teams. I don't know if it's an actual requirement though.
Pretty much.
The spreadsheet is a way to speed up the process of calculating the scores and displaying other info like the fixtures, ladder and results, but obviously there are still several manual processes that need to be done. Holz seems to be perennially busy and a vast majority of the coaches in this comp pretty much show up to just post their scores (incorrectly at times as well, which doesn't help).
Basically, it's assumed that a coach will, at the very least, name their team (correctly) in either the weekly thread or in the spreadsheet. Both is ideal, but not compulsory.
Personally, I do the former and then the latter when I have time, and then at the end of the weekend/round, I add in my opponent's team and scores if they haven't already been done.
So yeah, the only mandatory requirement is the naming of one's team every week, that's it. The rest is optional.
Quote from: Nige on May 11, 2017, 03:52:11 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 11, 2017, 03:35:12 PM
Quote from: Rids on May 11, 2017, 03:28:21 PM
I am confused sorry. My enquiry is actually a genuine one. For some reason Russia is coming up with a 0 in the match-ups.
I posted the team in the thread as I thought was correct. Was I meant to post it in the spreadsheet as well? Was there a rule change that I have missed?
It's coming up as 0 because nobody's input the list into the spreadsheet and put the numbers in yet. I think most coaches typically just do that themselves because it makes everyone's job easier. I've done it for the Bison most weeks and I'm sure others have for their teams. I don't know if it's an actual requirement though.
Pretty much.
The spreadsheet is a way to speed up the process of calculating the scores and displaying other info like the fixtures, ladder and results, but obviously there are still several manual processes that need to be done. Holz seems to be perennially busy and a vast majority of the coaches in this comp pretty much show up to just post their scores (incorrectly at times as well, which doesn't help).
Basically, it's assumed that a coach will, at the very least, name their team (correctly) in either the weekly thread or in the spreadsheet. Both is ideal, but not compulsory.
Personally, I do the former and then the latter when I have time, and then at the end of the weekend/round, I add in my opponent's team and scores if they haven't already been done.
So yeah, the only mandatory requirement is the naming of one's team every week, that's it. The rest is optional.
yep this is correct.
i have Friday night free so im going to finish round 4, start round 5 and have round 6 entered in the spreadsheet and Friday night games probably in. So then im actually ahead.
Nige is right its not a requirment but if teams could post in the google doc it would be nice. As it drops my work load a little bit.
Quote from: Holz on May 11, 2017, 04:13:43 PM
Quote from: Nige on May 11, 2017, 03:52:11 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 11, 2017, 03:35:12 PM
Quote from: Rids on May 11, 2017, 03:28:21 PM
I am confused sorry. My enquiry is actually a genuine one. For some reason Russia is coming up with a 0 in the match-ups.
I posted the team in the thread as I thought was correct. Was I meant to post it in the spreadsheet as well? Was there a rule change that I have missed?
It's coming up as 0 because nobody's input the list into the spreadsheet and put the numbers in yet. I think most coaches typically just do that themselves because it makes everyone's job easier. I've done it for the Bison most weeks and I'm sure others have for their teams. I don't know if it's an actual requirement though.
Pretty much.
The spreadsheet is a way to speed up the process of calculating the scores and displaying other info like the fixtures, ladder and results, but obviously there are still several manual processes that need to be done. Holz seems to be perennially busy and a vast majority of the coaches in this comp pretty much show up to just post their scores (incorrectly at times as well, which doesn't help).
Basically, it's assumed that a coach will, at the very least, name their team (correctly) in either the weekly thread or in the spreadsheet. Both is ideal, but not compulsory.
Personally, I do the former and then the latter when I have time, and then at the end of the weekend/round, I add in my opponent's team and scores if they haven't already been done.
So yeah, the only mandatory requirement is the naming of one's team every week, that's it. The rest is optional.
yep this is correct.
i have Friday night free so im going to finish round 4, start round 5 and have round 6 entered in the spreadsheet and Friday night games probably in. So then im actually ahead.
Nige is right its not a requirment but if teams could post in the google doc it would be nice. As it drops my work load a little bit.
Ah ok. I have only just got back from overseas 10 days ago so missed the spreadsheet altogether. Now that I know I will post in both.
Cheers
Round 4 team now posted in the google doc
Apologies for posting in the thread only so far this season, I'm always only able to get on using my phone on Thursday and Friday nights. I'll try and get on and put it into the spreadsheet when I can.
Swedish Metal 109 lost to English Lions 159
Swiss Storm 122 lost to Spanish Stallions 138
Croatian Crushers 141 def Hungarian Hulks 126
Belarus Bison 132 lost to Russian Roulettes 159
Serbian Eagles 142 lost to Svalbard Valkyries 156
Iceland Polar Bears 147 lost to Greek Titans 148
Macedonian Wolves 121 lost to Belgian Bashers 162
Just the lazy 162 for the Bashers, don't mind that