FanFooty Forum

AFL fantasy competitions => BXV Archives => British XVs => XVs Competitions => 2016 => Topic started by: Torpedo10 on February 08, 2016, 11:16:07 PM

Title: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Torpedo10 on February 08, 2016, 11:16:07 PM
Discussion Thread!  :D

Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on February 09, 2016, 12:44:03 PM
Taking a couple of items here for discussion so as to not clog up UF thread.

Emergencies -  There is provision in UF for emergency to replace a player based on TOG.  There are varying % going up in 5's from 0 - 50%.  Do we want to utilise this option to take out injuries in first quarter by setting at 15 or 20% or just leave at 0 and bad luck again if injured in first quarter.

Proposing to lock teams at first game of the round and captains as well. This will remove the loopholes available which will be hard to monitor in UF,

One to consider going forward is do we ant to use the Rebound 50 stat,  Do not want to do for this year as it may effect teams that have traded for the scoring system we propose.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on February 09, 2016, 01:51:22 PM
Emergencies: I'm in favour of having a TOG of 15-30% being replaced

Not fussed if lockout at first game or first Saturday game

Not a fan of rebound 50s being added, may as well add inside 50s then
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rusty00 on February 09, 2016, 02:07:25 PM
Emergencies: I'm in favour of no higher than 15%.

Lockout: not real fussed.

Not a fan of rebound 50s added as I feel it's too much tinkering of the scoring system.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Pkbaldy on February 09, 2016, 02:33:33 PM
Emergencies: 20% ( Just under a quarter of football)

Not fussed either

Nah, it's fine how it is imo.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on February 09, 2016, 02:42:49 PM
can someone one put the first topic in dummy form for me please going straight over my head
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on February 09, 2016, 02:47:16 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 09, 2016, 02:42:49 PM
can someone one put the first topic in dummy form for me please going straight over my head
If a player gets injured early on in a game, would you like to have your emergency replace them
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on February 09, 2016, 02:53:41 PM
Quote from: GoLions on February 09, 2016, 02:47:16 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 09, 2016, 02:42:49 PM
can someone one put the first topic in dummy form for me please going straight over my head
If a player gets injured early on in a game, would you like to have your emergency replace them

oh yeah for sho

and i like %20 cause as said just under a quarter
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Nige on February 09, 2016, 04:03:18 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on February 09, 2016, 02:07:25 PM
Emergencies: I'm in favour of no higher than 15%.

Lockout: not real fussed.

Not a fan of rebound 50s added as I feel it's too much tinkering of the scoring system.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: SydneyRox on February 09, 2016, 04:24:21 PM
yup 20%

Lockout on Friday is fine by me

Happy to look at reb 50 next year. I think we need to get over the fact our original scoring system is dead and just work towards a unique option with what UF provides?

Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Spite on February 09, 2016, 04:45:32 PM
25% - why not a quarter? Why are you guys all saying just under a quarter of football rather than if they're injured in the first quarter, then they get replaced (hence 25%)?

Lockout on Friday

Not a fan of R50s
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on February 09, 2016, 04:48:11 PM
Looks like a vote coming up for the emergency  with O, 15%, 20% and 25% options. Will probably send out later after a little more discussion.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rids on February 09, 2016, 04:59:33 PM
20% is fine by me

Not fussed when lockout occurs

Pass on anymore scoring changes for a year or 2 to first see the impact of the current changes
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on February 09, 2016, 05:29:43 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 09, 2016, 04:24:21 PM
yup 20%

Lockout on Friday is fine by me

Happy to look at reb 50 next year. I think we need to get over the fact our original scoring system is dead and just work towards a unique option with what UF provides?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Spite on February 09, 2016, 05:48:27 PM
I'm happy to go with 20% as it looks like it is going to win by a mile, but I would like someone to explain the reasoning rather than everyone just saying or quoting 20% over and over. Again, why not a quarter? Why are you guys all saying just under a quarter of football rather than if they're injured in the first quarter, then they get replaced (hence 25%)?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on February 09, 2016, 05:52:26 PM
Quote from: Spite on February 09, 2016, 05:48:27 PM
I'm happy to go with 20% as it looks like it is going to win by a mile, but I would like someone to explain the reasoning rather than everyone just saying or quoting 20% over and over. Again, why not a quarter? Why are you guys all saying just under a quarter of football rather than if they're injured in the first quarter, then they get replaced (hence 25%)?
I said I was fine with 15-30%, but yeah, something like 25% probably best
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on February 09, 2016, 05:54:24 PM
a quarter does make more sense and %15 seems an odd amount

imagine trying to work out if your player had %15 TOG or not least with %25 it's much easier to figure out

i know we wont have to work the scores out but people would want to know during the game
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Pkbaldy on February 09, 2016, 05:56:00 PM
Quote from: Spite on February 09, 2016, 05:48:27 PM
I'm happy to go with 20% as it looks like it is going to win by a mile, but I would like someone to explain the reasoning rather than everyone just saying or quoting 20% over and over. Again, why not a quarter? Why are you guys all saying just under a quarter of football rather than if they're injured in the first quarter, then they get replaced (hence 25%)?

I said 20%, because personally I notice most injuries occur in the first 15-20 minutes of a game. And depending on injury time, 20% could actually become the entire first quarter. But 20% or 25% would be fine by me.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on February 09, 2016, 07:13:12 PM
Can I just say the reason I suggested 15 or 20% is to cover injuries in the first 10 - 15 minutes of the game.  If a player does not come back after quarter time I reckon that is bad luck and just think 25% is a little high but my opinion which I am sharing.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: LF on February 09, 2016, 07:14:41 PM
tbh I think we should just be sucking it up if a player gets injured,we have to in SC etc
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on February 09, 2016, 07:32:50 PM
Quote from: LF on February 09, 2016, 07:14:41 PM
tbh I think we should just be sucking it up if a player gets injured,we have to in SC etc
We also have rolling lockout in SC ;)

I like 20-25% the more I think about it
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: LF on February 09, 2016, 07:33:52 PM
Quote from: GoLions on February 09, 2016, 07:32:50 PM
Quote from: LF on February 09, 2016, 07:14:41 PM
tbh I think we should just be sucking it up if a player gets injured,we have to in SC etc
We also have rolling lockout in SC ;)

I like 20-25% the more I think about it

Um doesn't help you much with injured players actually on the field now does it
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on February 09, 2016, 07:36:40 PM
Quote from: LF on February 09, 2016, 07:33:52 PM
Quote from: GoLions on February 09, 2016, 07:32:50 PM
Quote from: LF on February 09, 2016, 07:14:41 PM
tbh I think we should just be sucking it up if a player gets injured,we have to in SC etc
We also have rolling lockout in SC ;)

I like 20-25% the more I think about it

Um doesn't help you much with injured players actually on the field now does it
It helps with late outs though, which in our case would potentially allow us to field an emg and have another emg come in as well

My main point though was that we aren't SC :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rids on February 09, 2016, 11:00:41 PM
I think 20% is plenty. We are really only after the guys that get injured early in games. I think if a player plays a qtr then that score should count. There has to still be some luck aspect involved. Reduced interchanges should mean that games and players intensity drop off a little as the game progresses. So naturally if this is the case, then the intensity will be at it's highest point at the start of the game when everyone is fresh. Now I know there will be exceptions etc but it is a general rule of thumb.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Memphistopheles on February 10, 2016, 12:25:22 AM
20% is fine
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: nostradamus on February 10, 2016, 09:29:10 AM
yep 20% is about right
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on February 26, 2016, 06:08:49 PM
Seeing as I got to pick up another rookie after Waters retired at the start of last year, I'm assuming Vinnamon will get to pick up a rookie to replace Jaensch if he wishes?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on February 26, 2016, 06:31:04 PM
Yep as per rules any retirements between end of delistings and start of season compensation players allowed.  Note the bolding as it is only for players that retire between end of de-listing period and start of season.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on February 28, 2016, 02:51:38 PM
Oxford Owls have selected Nathan Brown to replace the retired Matthew Jaensch.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rusty00 on February 28, 2016, 09:52:14 PM
So this means that the Werewolves get a compo pick for Damien Cavka retiring as well?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on February 28, 2016, 09:58:59 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on February 28, 2016, 09:52:14 PM
So this means that the Werewolves get a compo pick for Damien Cavka retiring as well?
I didn't even know he retired, when did that happen?

But yes, you should also get a compo pick. Will wait for ringo to confirm though.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on February 28, 2016, 11:09:25 PM
I missed the announcement too GL.  Apologies to Werewolves otherwise I would have contacted you as well.

Cavka retired in January so Werewolves are entitled to a compensation pick.  Please post selection in this thread when selected so UF can be updated.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rusty00 on February 29, 2016, 11:51:10 AM
Quote from: Ringo on February 28, 2016, 11:09:25 PM
I missed the announcement too GL.  Apologies to Werewolves otherwise I would have contacted you as well.

Cavka retired in January so Werewolves are entitled to a compensation pick.  Please post selection in this thread when selected so UF can be updated.
We'll pick Josh Clayton.

Cheers
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on February 29, 2016, 01:30:00 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on February 29, 2016, 11:51:10 AM
Quote from: Ringo on February 28, 2016, 11:09:25 PM
I missed the announcement too GL.  Apologies to Werewolves otherwise I would have contacted you as well.

Cavka retired in January so Werewolves are entitled to a compensation pick.  Please post selection in this thread when selected so UF can be updated.
We'll pick Josh Clayton.

Cheers
Updated in UF
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on February 29, 2016, 02:27:30 PM
excited about the Dragons upcoming year think we have a strong side

(http://i63.tinypic.com/jjqvrm.jpg)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Nige on February 29, 2016, 02:47:58 PM
Rumour has it the assistant admin is already planning to abuse his powers.  :o
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on February 29, 2016, 02:52:37 PM
Quote from: Nige on February 29, 2016, 02:47:58 PM
Rumour has it the assistant admin is already planning to abuse his powers.  :o
Nah - have been asking him to test to see if he had access,  :D :D
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Nige on February 29, 2016, 03:08:27 PM
Quote from: Ringo on February 29, 2016, 02:52:37 PM
Quote from: Nige on February 29, 2016, 02:47:58 PM
Rumour has it the assistant admin is already planning to abuse his powers.  :o
Nah - have been asking him to test to see if he had access,  :D :D
I have all the evidence I need.  :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Pkbaldy on February 29, 2016, 03:11:28 PM
Quote from: Nige on February 29, 2016, 03:08:27 PM
Quote from: Ringo on February 29, 2016, 02:52:37 PM
Quote from: Nige on February 29, 2016, 02:47:58 PM
Rumour has it the assistant admin is already planning to abuse his powers.  :o
Nah - have been asking him to test to see if he had access,  :D :D
I have all the evidence I need.  :P
Can confirm!

#powerhungrydave
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on February 29, 2016, 07:47:09 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 29, 2016, 02:27:30 PM
excited about the Dragons upcoming year think we have a strong side
That's actually really strong...if you don't get any injuries, will probably push for top 6 potentially :o

But if you do get 2-3 injuries, depth could struggle
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Memphistopheles on February 29, 2016, 11:56:23 PM
For the first time since taking over the horrible mess that was the Staines Steins when I first started I'm really excited about our team's chances. We're not going to win, but there's a chance we could challenge for a Top 8 spot perhaps if we get a bit of luck.

We finally have Mid and Uti lines to be proud of, instead of having to just play whoever's starting for their AFL team. And, our ruck options are probably the best in the league. Defence and depth are still a bit of a worry with most back-ups being improving kids.

Def: Elliot Yeo, Lee Spurr, Ricky Henderson, Nick Vlastuin
Mid: Kieren Jack, Marcus Bontempelli, Jack Redden, Lachie Hunter
Ruc: Max Gawn
Fwd: Jamie Elliott, Jesse Hogan, Josh Jenkins, Adam Tomlinson
Uti: Brodie Grundy, Josh Kelly

E: Tendai Mzungu (D), Callum Mills (M), Rhys Stanley (R), Christian Petracca (F)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 01, 2016, 11:21:46 AM
That is a nice looking team considering where you came from.  Well done and watch out for the Staines in 2017 as they have some handy developing players as well.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 02, 2016, 02:57:13 PM
We still have 5 coaches to vote on the TOG or no emergency replacements.  Please do as soon as possible.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rids on March 02, 2016, 04:14:43 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 02, 2016, 02:57:13 PM
We still have 5 coaches to vote on the TOG or no emergency replacements.  Please do as soon as possible.


Did I vote yet? I think I said 20% but not too worried and will go with the majority if I haven't.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on March 02, 2016, 05:01:25 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 02, 2016, 02:57:13 PM
We still have 5 coaches to vote on the TOG or no emergency replacements.  Please do as soon as possible.
Re-send the PM to those who haven't I guess, as they may have missed it
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on March 07, 2016, 04:39:37 PM
So the injury curse for the werewolves has already begun
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 07, 2016, 04:43:56 PM
We have had 14 of the 16 Teams vote on the Emergency replacement (Hawks and Magic First warning for missing a vote).

Results:
No Change 1
20% TOG 9
25% TOG 4

So we will be working that emergencies can also replace players who spend 20% or less TOG.  Rules in UF will be updated,
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rusty00 on March 07, 2016, 04:56:27 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 07, 2016, 04:39:37 PM
So the injury curse for the werewolves has already begun
:'(
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Torpedo10 on March 07, 2016, 05:10:52 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 07, 2016, 04:43:56 PM
We have had 14 of the 16 Teams vote on the Emergency replacement (Hawks and Magic First warning for missing a vote).

Results:
No Change 1
20% TOG 9
25% TOG 4

So we will be working that emergencies can also replace players who spend 20% or less TOG.  Rules in UF will be updated,
Apologies Ringo, I saw the original PM and didn't respond immediately.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: JBs-Hawks on March 07, 2016, 05:26:39 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on March 07, 2016, 05:10:52 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 07, 2016, 04:43:56 PM
We have had 14 of the 16 Teams vote on the Emergency replacement (Hawks and Magic First warning for missing a vote).

Results:
No Change 1
20% TOG 9
25% TOG 4

So we will be working that emergencies can also replace players who spend 20% or less TOG.  Rules in UF will be updated,
Apologies Ringo, I saw the original PM and didn't respond immediately.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 13, 2016, 04:01:59 PM
Will send out a vote but when reviewing our rules there are a couple we still have to finalise before start of season so having a discussion here and will send out vote early next week before season starts.

1. Team lodgement - Teams to be lodged in UF by lockout at bounce of first game. Do we need to monitor for penalties that is what we need to decide.

2. Emergency scoring - We have passed a rule that if a player on field has less than 20% TOG then emergency from same line replaces it.  UF does not allow players OOP so they will have to be either PM'd or Lodged in the Rd thread prior to lockout to enable adjustment for half points. Question will be do we allow OOP.

3. Sub rule - with the change in emergency rules do we retain our sub rule or scrap all together given that the AFL has scrapped sub rule.  If we continue will require some more manual work.  So question will be continue yes or no.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 13, 2016, 04:27:55 PM
with team lodgements

ii assume it's like supercoach and some weeks you wont have to change your team unless injuries

so i say unless it's obvious like if Rockliff is announced as out on Thursday and i don't take him out by lockout usual penalties apply

so if it looks like a coach hasnt even looked at the team for a week or 2 then apply penalty
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on March 13, 2016, 04:30:18 PM
1. How do you actually see if people are checking on their team each week now? Because a coach could essentially leave their team the same for a few weeks even if they are checking on it for injuries and everything, or because they're just not caring for it that much. Hard to judge I guess, unless a team is hit by injuries and they keep those players in their team each week.

2. I think you have to allow OOP. What happens if someone has their ruckman go down with injury, and their backup (if any) doesn't get named? Don't think it is fair if they have to cop a zero.

3. Personally, I think people (myself included) would have traded with the sub rule in mind. I'm happy to have a vote for if we get rid of it for next year or not though.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Nige on March 13, 2016, 04:41:42 PM
The UF side of things helps with the scoring system and calculating scores. All teams should still be lodged here though, otherwise coaches can disappear for the entire season and get away with it.

Gotta have OOP. No question about that. That's another reason to have the lodgement thread, means you can clearly see who someone is playing OOP and make the necessary adjustment.

AFL's scrapped the sub rule, so should we. The new emergency rule we have is similar to an extent so there's no need for it.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: LF on March 13, 2016, 04:49:01 PM
Lodge teams here as well

Keep OOP see above for OOP selections

We have the TOG thing and with AFL not having vests anymore we don't need the sub rule,do we really want to make it even easier by handing out more concessions on injured players or players that just played like shower for the week,also starts complicating things with scores if suddenly you have more admin stuff to do when we moved to UF to make it easier for you Ringo

I assume  we are also scrapping the 20 points rule now that UF works out scores out for us
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 13, 2016, 04:50:33 PM
Forgot to add scrapping the Bonus points as well.  Thanks LF for the reminder.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: nrich102 on March 13, 2016, 05:15:46 PM
I thought we dumped the sub rule  :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 13, 2016, 05:24:40 PM
Quote from: nrich102 on March 13, 2016, 05:15:46 PM
I thought we dumped the sub rule  :P
We have not as yet as I said was reviewing rules and those we have voted on but have not done anything on these as yet.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: SydneyRox on March 13, 2016, 05:32:15 PM
Think OOP is a good idea.

Dont see the need to post a team each week, you can tell if someone is not updating the team

not fussed on sub, didnt we say something about 25% game time?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rids on March 14, 2016, 07:38:18 PM
1. Dont care
2. Allow - OOP is important to the league
3. scrap
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Spite on March 15, 2016, 07:42:15 PM
1. No need to post here, just wastes time.
2. Allow
3. Ditch
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 15, 2016, 09:53:21 PM
So going on comments and do not think we need to vote as we have a nice consensus.

1) Admin will monitor teams in UF and if it is obvious teams are not being updated then warnings issued and if necessary penalties issued.  Most times teams will change little but if injuryy player not replaced and other players available for example that will ring bells..

2.) I will set up a thread called OOP advices and if wishing to use an OOP must be posted in the thread stating the player the OOP is replacing.

eg replacing Todd Golstein with Nathan Fyfe oop. (Just an example mind you).

3) Sub rule is removed due to the TOG changes we have made.

4) Bonus points for listing scores removed.

Probably the only contentious one is whether to also name teams here but I think it will be obvious when teams not revised,
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 15, 2016, 09:57:10 PM
i'm looking forward to using ultimate footy so easy to just make a couple changes on there instead of naming the full team here and editing again and again if needed

although i am worried the banter will drop right off

are we still gonna gave weekly threads to discuss games or guess we can just have 1 and use it each week
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 15, 2016, 10:08:50 PM
Good point KB I think I will still raise weekly game threads in which to banter and lodge OOP etc.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: JBs-Hawks on March 15, 2016, 10:36:09 PM
Surely it is not that hard to post up your team on here as well as UF.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Spite on March 15, 2016, 11:21:14 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 15, 2016, 10:08:50 PM
Good point KB I think I will still raise weekly game threads in which to banter and lodge OOP etc.

Good idea.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Nige on March 15, 2016, 11:55:41 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on March 15, 2016, 10:36:09 PM
Surely it is not that hard to post up your team on here as well as UF.
It's as if people don't use this forum otherwise or something. Literally takes no more than 5 mins to post the team here.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 16, 2016, 12:04:04 AM
Quote from: Nige on March 15, 2016, 11:55:41 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on March 15, 2016, 10:36:09 PM
Surely it is not that hard to post up your team on here as well as UF.
It's as if people don't use this forum otherwise or something. Literally takes no more than 5 mins to post the team here.

well when u own a few keeper league teams plus the 3 DT, AF, SC  lets say Rockliff is a late out 20min b4 the bounce i have to rush and change all my teams i'd rather not have to post here for no reason also

don't say late outs never happen cause they do

i think if people want they can post teams in the weekly banter but shouldn't be a requirement

Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on March 16, 2016, 02:26:18 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 16, 2016, 12:04:04 AM
Quote from: Nige on March 15, 2016, 11:55:41 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on March 15, 2016, 10:36:09 PM
Surely it is not that hard to post up your team on here as well as UF.
It's as if people don't use this forum otherwise or something. Literally takes no more than 5 mins to post the team here.

well when u own a few keeper league teams plus the 3 DT, AF, SC  lets say Rockliff is a late out 20min b4 the bounce i have to rush and change all my teams i'd rather not have to post here for no reason also

don't say late outs never happen cause they do

i think if people want they can post teams in the weekly banter but shouldn't be a requirement
Tbh I'm more than happy to take Rocky off your hands kb
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 16, 2016, 02:40:45 AM
Quote from: GoLions on March 16, 2016, 02:26:18 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 16, 2016, 12:04:04 AM
Quote from: Nige on March 15, 2016, 11:55:41 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on March 15, 2016, 10:36:09 PM
Surely it is not that hard to post up your team on here as well as UF.
It's as if people don't use this forum otherwise or something. Literally takes no more than 5 mins to post the team here.

well when u own a few keeper league teams plus the 3 DT, AF, SC  lets say Rockliff is a late out 20min b4 the bounce i have to rush and change all my teams i'd rather not have to post here for no reason also

don't say late outs never happen cause they do

i think if people want they can post teams in the weekly banter but shouldn't be a requirement
Tbh I'm more than happy to take Rocky off your hands kb

you don't have the currency
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on March 16, 2016, 02:43:05 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 16, 2016, 02:40:45 AM
Quote from: GoLions on March 16, 2016, 02:26:18 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 16, 2016, 12:04:04 AM
Quote from: Nige on March 15, 2016, 11:55:41 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on March 15, 2016, 10:36:09 PM
Surely it is not that hard to post up your team on here as well as UF.
It's as if people don't use this forum otherwise or something. Literally takes no more than 5 mins to post the team here.

well when u own a few keeper league teams plus the 3 DT, AF, SC  lets say Rockliff is a late out 20min b4 the bounce i have to rush and change all my teams i'd rather not have to post here for no reason also

don't say late outs never happen cause they do

i think if people want they can post teams in the weekly banter but shouldn't be a requirement
Tbh I'm more than happy to take Rocky off your hands kb

you don't have the currency
Everyone has the currency. But not many would be willing to pay haha
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 16, 2016, 03:04:20 AM
no reason to trade him really still so young will probably be the in the top 3 mids at least with this scoring if not the #1 mid

he paired with Tom Mitchell is a great combo

and everyone doesn't have the currency would have to have 2 players i badly want
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 16, 2016, 09:52:48 PM
Ok thinks like we have differing opinions whether to name teams in a thread so will send out a vote.

Vote will offer two options

Option 1, Name Out of Position Players in thread only
Option 2. Name complete team including OOP in thread.

Note for privacy voting is done via PM not in this thread
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 18, 2016, 04:09:00 AM
kinda regret not taking Dea now even though i have pretty good defense depth
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: LF on March 19, 2016, 02:10:37 PM
http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,106263.0.html

Vacant Coaching position if anyone is interested
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 21, 2016, 05:36:31 PM
Voting has now been completed with one coach not voting and 2 coaches happy with either approach.

Votes cast
Option 1 Naming OOP players only 10 votes
Option 2 Naming Full team including OOP 3 votes.

So if playing players OOP you will need to list in the Weekly match day thread.

Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 28, 2016, 07:14:00 PM
PK has raised a valid point concerning HGA with the UF scoring we have a very possibility that one team can have a HGA of 100+ Think this is quite an advantage so just wondering whether we should divide by 2 to be a little more fairer.

Comments welcome and if we have consensus will adjust.

been tied up with quite a few other matters as well and only just noticed that the draw that UF has done is not very even Breakers do not mind though as we get all home games,  Will be doing a draw myself and then seeing if I can put into UF.  (First lesson learned in UF draw not even for HGA).
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: nostradamus on March 28, 2016, 07:24:05 PM
Why not just do away with it ?? .......problem solved  8)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Pkbaldy on March 28, 2016, 07:47:43 PM
To save you the worry of doing it for the draw, might as well just flick it off?

I assumed UF had done that draw evenly so it wouldn't have been much effort... haha
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 28, 2016, 09:06:18 PM
Please just say here if you want to do away with it or options for discussions here.  have no strong ways one way or the other.

Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: SydneyRox on March 28, 2016, 09:08:42 PM
lose it
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Pkbaldy on March 28, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on March 28, 2016, 09:08:42 PM
lose it
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: nrich102 on March 28, 2016, 09:11:52 PM
Quote from: Pkbaldy on March 28, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on March 28, 2016, 09:08:42 PM
lose it
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: LF on March 28, 2016, 09:12:55 PM
Don't care
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rusty00 on March 28, 2016, 09:15:07 PM
Quote from: nrich102 on March 28, 2016, 09:11:52 PM
Quote from: Pkbaldy on March 28, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on March 28, 2016, 09:08:42 PM
lose it
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Nige on March 28, 2016, 11:47:04 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 28, 2016, 09:15:07 PM
Quote from: nrich102 on March 28, 2016, 09:11:52 PM
Quote from: Pkbaldy on March 28, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on March 28, 2016, 09:08:42 PM
lose it
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 28, 2016, 11:48:29 PM
Quote from: LF on March 28, 2016, 09:12:55 PM
Don't care
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on March 29, 2016, 04:17:35 PM
Sorry been pretty busy. I'm happy to lose hga, especially as I lost like 2 games because of it last year (out of 3 iirc)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 04:18:32 PM
So consensus is to do away with it so there is no HGA for this season.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on March 29, 2016, 04:23:17 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 04:18:32 PM
So consensus is to do away with it so there is no HGA for this season.
I would suggest still sending out a PM as some coaches are still yet to respond.

I'm not fussed either way, but some might really want to keep it, which wouldn't surprise me as we're taking away that "home and away" feel
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 04:26:41 PM
We already have more than 50% coaches agreeing to do away with it so a vote is not necessary.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on March 29, 2016, 04:31:43 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 04:26:41 PM
We already have more than 50% coaches agreeing to do away with it so a vote is not necessary.
Well, technically there's 6 against and 3 who aren't fussed :P

I just think this is something that everyone should have a say in.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 04:52:06 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 29, 2016, 04:31:43 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 04:26:41 PM
We already have more than 50% coaches agreeing to do away with it so a vote is not necessary.
Well, technically there's 6 against and 3 who aren't fussed :P

I just think this is something that everyone should have a say in.
izander has also said do away in the match day thread.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on March 29, 2016, 04:54:26 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 04:52:06 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 29, 2016, 04:31:43 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 29, 2016, 04:26:41 PM
We already have more than 50% coaches agreeing to do away with it so a vote is not necessary.
Well, technically there's 6 against and 3 who aren't fussed :P

I just think this is something that everyone should have a say in.
izander has also said do away in the match day thread.
Yep
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Vinny on March 29, 2016, 05:19:24 PM
Quote from: Nige on March 28, 2016, 11:47:04 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 28, 2016, 09:15:07 PM
Quote from: nrich102 on March 28, 2016, 09:11:52 PM
Quote from: Pkbaldy on March 28, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Quote from: SydneyRox on March 28, 2016, 09:08:42 PM
lose it
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on March 31, 2016, 08:32:59 PM
Out of curiosity, which version of our teams are taken as final? I'll always name my team on FF, but like, I'll be making changes every now and then throughout the week on UF and might not update those on FF all the time, and wanna make sure I don't end up in a situation where the team I want isn't the ones that is used.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on March 31, 2016, 08:40:40 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 31, 2016, 08:32:59 PM
Out of curiosity, which version of our teams are taken as final? I'll always name my team on FF, but like, I'll be making changes every now and then throughout the week on UF and might not update those on FF all the time, and wanna make sure I don't end up in a situation where the team I want isn't the ones that is used.

Since you don't need to name ur teams on here id assume UF....? Shouldn't be a problem with UF going down this week since no Thursday night game :P But yeah i don't really know lol
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on March 31, 2016, 08:41:55 PM
Quote from: iZander on March 31, 2016, 08:40:40 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 31, 2016, 08:32:59 PM
Out of curiosity, which version of our teams are taken as final? I'll always name my team on FF, but like, I'll be making changes every now and then throughout the week on UF and might not update those on FF all the time, and wanna make sure I don't end up in a situation where the team I want isn't the ones that is used.

Since you don't need to name ur teams on here id assume UF....? Shouldn't be a problem with UF going down this week since no Thursday night game :P But yeah i don't really know lol
Yeah I just wanna make sure haha, I'd assume UF as well though
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on March 31, 2016, 11:54:31 PM
AS an admin and because UF has made it easy - I will only be going back to teams named when UF has players with 0 recorded and check the team lodgement and adjust if necessary eg OOP.  I will assume that all other adjustments are correct.

We had the situation last week where a team was left with no coverage.  I did not apply the emergency rule as teams have not been in priority order as yet.  can I ask you all to advise your current list in priority order in this thread please,

http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,105127.0.html

This will allow me should the Owls situation arise again to select the next playing defender from the ordered list for quarter points as per rule.  rather than incur a zero.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rusty00 on April 01, 2016, 10:25:14 AM
What did we end up deciding about the Bye weeks this year? I can't recall.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on April 01, 2016, 10:56:07 AM
We are not playing through the byes will probably play the North v South challenge and it will probably be over two weeks allowing for the byes and then a spare week. Any suggestions for the spare week welcome but comfortable to have a week off if that is consensus.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rusty00 on April 01, 2016, 09:40:32 PM
Thanks Ringo, couldn't remember what was decided
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Nige on April 04, 2016, 10:55:08 AM
Oh look, an announcement! (http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,84683.msg1739118.html#new)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on April 12, 2016, 01:55:44 PM
Apparently Dion is out :'(
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on April 26, 2016, 02:46:58 PM
Zaha for Dickson trade is haunting me i knew i was losing it but did it for team structure didn't expect this kind of form from Zaha

most other trades have been fruitful though
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:21:30 PM
Cotchin with a fractured cheekbone, gone for 2 weeks. Hurricanes shall remain undefeated after next week :'(
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:29:58 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:21:30 PM
Cotchin with a fractured cheekbone, gone for 2 weeks. Hurricanes shall remain undefeated after next week :'(

Not so sure mate, Armitage and Laird out would be huge outs for sure :P We will have to wait and see, laird out would particularly hurt with Muphy already gone and trusty 5th man May spending extended time on the sideline. Although Luke brown has really stood up this year and Ciaran Byrnes also could fill the spot :P

Arma played like the whole game injured and still managed 148, what a beast :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:51:28 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:29:58 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:21:30 PM
Cotchin with a fractured cheekbone, gone for 2 weeks. Hurricanes shall remain undefeated after next week :'(

Not so sure mate, Armitage and Laird out would be huge outs for sure :P We will have to wait and see, laird out would particularly hurt with Muphy already gone and trusty 5th man May spending extended time on the sideline. Although Luke brown has really stood up this year and Ciaran Byrnes also could fill the spot :P

Arma played like the whole game injured and still managed 148, what a beast :P
Remember I'm already missing Nicholls, Riska, and Sir Daniel of Caleb

Really missing Caleb in particular :(
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:57:43 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:51:28 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:29:58 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:21:30 PM
Cotchin with a fractured cheekbone, gone for 2 weeks. Hurricanes shall remain undefeated after next week :'(

Not so sure mate, Armitage and Laird out would be huge outs for sure :P We will have to wait and see, laird out would particularly hurt with Muphy already gone and trusty 5th man May spending extended time on the sideline. Although Luke brown has really stood up this year and Ciaran Byrnes also could fill the spot :P

Arma played like the whole game injured and still managed 148, what a beast :P
Remember I'm already missing Nicholls, Riska, and Sir Daniel of Caleb

Really missing Caleb in particular :(

Thought Caleb was back next week? :P
And i don't think you can count players who get dropped ;) Risk wasn't best 15 anyway not even with Cotch out :)
(I thought riska was out for the year but on the gold coast website they have him listed as test)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 02:03:48 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:57:43 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:51:28 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:29:58 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:21:30 PM
Cotchin with a fractured cheekbone, gone for 2 weeks. Hurricanes shall remain undefeated after next week :'(

Not so sure mate, Armitage and Laird out would be huge outs for sure :P We will have to wait and see, laird out would particularly hurt with Muphy already gone and trusty 5th man May spending extended time on the sideline. Although Luke brown has really stood up this year and Ciaran Byrnes also could fill the spot :P

Arma played like the whole game injured and still managed 148, what a beast :P
Remember I'm already missing Nicholls, Riska, and Sir Daniel of Caleb

Really missing Caleb in particular :(

Thought Caleb was back next week? :P
And i don't think you can count players who get dropped ;) Risk wasn't best 15 anyway not even with Cotch out :)
(I thought riska was out for the year but on the gold coast website they have him listed as test)
Caleb not 100% to return. Dunno what's happening with Nicholls, killed it then got dropped? And Riska out for a few weeks iirc, so means I'll have to play an extra forward or two.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on May 01, 2016, 02:08:05 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 02:03:48 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:57:43 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:51:28 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:29:58 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:21:30 PM
Cotchin with a fractured cheekbone, gone for 2 weeks. Hurricanes shall remain undefeated after next week :'(

Not so sure mate, Armitage and Laird out would be huge outs for sure :P We will have to wait and see, laird out would particularly hurt with Muphy already gone and trusty 5th man May spending extended time on the sideline. Although Luke brown has really stood up this year and Ciaran Byrnes also could fill the spot :P

Arma played like the whole game injured and still managed 148, what a beast :P
Remember I'm already missing Nicholls, Riska, and Sir Daniel of Caleb

Really missing Caleb in particular :(

Thought Caleb was back next week? :P
And i don't think you can count players who get dropped ;) Risk wasn't best 15 anyway not even with Cotch out :)
(I thought riska was out for the year but on the gold coast website they have him listed as test)
Caleb not 100% to return. Dunno what's happening with Nicholls, killed it then got dropped? And Riska out for a few weeks iirc, so means I'll have to play an extra forward or two.
yeah Nicholls played his best game then dropped haha, could come in this week with Gold Coast no doubt wanting to make a lot of changes!
Your forwards probably score better than Riska anyway :P That forward line is potent
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 02:10:10 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 02:08:05 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 02:03:48 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:57:43 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:51:28 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:29:58 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:21:30 PM
Cotchin with a fractured cheekbone, gone for 2 weeks. Hurricanes shall remain undefeated after next week :'(

Not so sure mate, Armitage and Laird out would be huge outs for sure :P We will have to wait and see, laird out would particularly hurt with Muphy already gone and trusty 5th man May spending extended time on the sideline. Although Luke brown has really stood up this year and Ciaran Byrnes also could fill the spot :P

Arma played like the whole game injured and still managed 148, what a beast :P
Remember I'm already missing Nicholls, Riska, and Sir Daniel of Caleb

Really missing Caleb in particular :(

Thought Caleb was back next week? :P
And i don't think you can count players who get dropped ;) Risk wasn't best 15 anyway not even with Cotch out :)
(I thought riska was out for the year but on the gold coast website they have him listed as test)
Caleb not 100% to return. Dunno what's happening with Nicholls, killed it then got dropped? And Riska out for a few weeks iirc, so means I'll have to play an extra forward or two.
yeah Nicholls played his best game then dropped haha, could come in this week with Gold Coast no doubt wanting to make a lot of changes!
Your forwards probably score better than Riska anyway :P That forward line is potent
Haha true, although Higgins and Lynch didn't do much this week :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on May 01, 2016, 02:14:09 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 02:10:10 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 02:08:05 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 02:03:48 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:57:43 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:51:28 PM
Quote from: iZander on May 01, 2016, 01:29:58 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 01, 2016, 01:21:30 PM
Cotchin with a fractured cheekbone, gone for 2 weeks. Hurricanes shall remain undefeated after next week :'(

Not so sure mate, Armitage and Laird out would be huge outs for sure :P We will have to wait and see, laird out would particularly hurt with Muphy already gone and trusty 5th man May spending extended time on the sideline. Although Luke brown has really stood up this year and Ciaran Byrnes also could fill the spot :P

Arma played like the whole game injured and still managed 148, what a beast :P
Remember I'm already missing Nicholls, Riska, and Sir Daniel of Caleb

Really missing Caleb in particular :(

Thought Caleb was back next week? :P
And i don't think you can count players who get dropped ;) Risk wasn't best 15 anyway not even with Cotch out :)
(I thought riska was out for the year but on the gold coast website they have him listed as test)
Caleb not 100% to return. Dunno what's happening with Nicholls, killed it then got dropped? And Riska out for a few weeks iirc, so means I'll have to play an extra forward or two.
yeah Nicholls played his best game then dropped haha, could come in this week with Gold Coast no doubt wanting to make a lot of changes!
Your forwards probably score better than Riska anyway :P That forward line is potent
Haha true, although Higgins and Lynch didn't do much this week :P
haha tough on Lynch, wasn't really his fault :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on May 11, 2016, 11:13:41 AM
Now Higgins out for 3 months :(

At least it'll make it easier for me to choose my forwards :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Nige on May 12, 2016, 10:58:51 PM
If anyone wants to edit/design their guernsey in UF, they can do that now.  :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on June 03, 2016, 10:33:13 AM
It was raised in Match day thread whether we should have HGA for finals.

It was originally thought that we could do this throughout the season with UF doing the draw.  However although they did the draw well it did not allow for HGA. For those that are detail minded you would have noted that Breakers were always the first team named each week and that is the reason we abandoned as it would have taken more work to adjust a fair HGA based on UF draw.

However with finals it is easier to do based on ladder position so what are thoughts on HGA for finals excluding the GF.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on June 03, 2016, 10:53:52 AM
not too worried either way tbh
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: JBs-Hawks on June 03, 2016, 11:20:15 AM
I think there should be HGA, gives reward to those who have put in a good season. Otherwise there is no difference between finishing 1st and 4th and 5th or 8th.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on June 07, 2016, 02:52:14 PM
Man, can't believe how close I was to trading Cotchin to the Hurricanes to get Big Stefan. Cotch averaging a tick over 196, Stef averaging 133. Crazy.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on June 07, 2016, 02:58:23 PM
Quote from: GoLions on June 07, 2016, 02:52:14 PM
Man, can't believe how close I was to trading Cotchin to the Hurricanes to get Big Stefan. Cotch averaging a tick over 196, Stef averaging 133. Crazy.
Noooooooo, damn the Minson for Currie trade :( I knew Cotch was in for a good season :/

Wasn't just for Cotch either, i remember a Cotch + N13 + Minson offer ;) (i think)

I won't complain with Jelwood though :P and big Alex Pearce hahaha
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on June 07, 2016, 03:10:21 PM
Quote from: iZander on June 07, 2016, 02:58:23 PM
Quote from: GoLions on June 07, 2016, 02:52:14 PM
Man, can't believe how close I was to trading Cotchin to the Hurricanes to get Big Stefan. Cotch averaging a tick over 196, Stef averaging 133. Crazy.
Noooooooo, damn the Minson for Currie trade :( I knew Cotch was in for a good season :/

Wasn't just for Cotch either, i remember a Cotch + N13 + Minson offer ;) (i think)

I won't complain with Jelwood though :P and big Alex Pearce hahaha
Haha yeah, I think you were gonna give me a 2nd rounder back as well or something. Either way, would've been one of the worst trades ever for me, but at the time was pretty even!
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on June 07, 2016, 03:19:10 PM
Quote from: GoLions on June 07, 2016, 03:10:21 PM
Quote from: iZander on June 07, 2016, 02:58:23 PM
Quote from: GoLions on June 07, 2016, 02:52:14 PM
Man, can't believe how close I was to trading Cotchin to the Hurricanes to get Big Stefan. Cotch averaging a tick over 196, Stef averaging 133. Crazy.
Noooooooo, damn the Minson for Currie trade :( I knew Cotch was in for a good season :/

Wasn't just for Cotch either, i remember a Cotch + N13 + Minson offer ;) (i think)

I won't complain with Jelwood though :P and big Alex Pearce hahaha
Haha yeah, I think you were gonna give me a 2nd rounder back as well or something. Either way, would've been one of the worst trades ever for me, but at the time was pretty even!
Yeah, not sure anyone could of predicted this big of a fall from Stef, he'd been very consistent. Trades were fair at the time :/
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Nige on June 07, 2016, 05:26:56 PM
Kinda wish I kept Currie tbh.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on June 07, 2016, 05:48:01 PM
Not that i was really doubting it but Rob Murphy plays on!!! woooo :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on June 13, 2016, 08:37:36 PM
Have we any suggestions what to do for rd 15.

I am just wondering whether we have a ten player per team Rivalry Round as we do not have a designated rivalry round this year.

Happy to have a break if that is the opinion of all.  Over to you all for discussions.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on June 13, 2016, 10:10:28 PM
Quote from: Ringo on June 13, 2016, 08:37:36 PM
Have we any suggestions what to do for rd 15.

I am just wondering whether we have a ten player per team Rivalry Round as we do not have a designated rivalry round this year.

Happy to have a break if that is the opinion of all.  Over to you all for discussions.
The more competition the better imo, thats if someone is happy to organise it of course!

Do we have rivalries? If so, what are they?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on June 13, 2016, 10:29:21 PM
Is there any reason not to do North vs South over all 3 rounds?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on June 13, 2016, 11:54:51 PM
I have a question regarding a rule that i thought just made logical sense but today i was told that rule is not the case in worlds so I'm wondering if it is not a rule in British either.

Say for example a you have a midfielder late out and you have two pure defenders on your utilities and no mids on your emergencies but you have a forward or defender with a mid status as well. Does that Fwd/Defender move to the mid spot and your first named emergency come on in the fwd/def?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on June 13, 2016, 11:59:11 PM
Quote from: iZander on June 13, 2016, 11:54:51 PM
I have a question regarding a rule that i thought just made logical sense but today i was told that rule is not the case in worlds so I'm wondering if it is not a rule in British either.

Say for example a you have a midfielder late out and you have two pure defenders on your utilities and no mids on your emergencies but you have a forward or defender with a mid status as well. Does that Fwd/Defender move to the mid spot and your first named emergency come on in the fwd/def?
Nope. You'd get first preference emg oop.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on June 14, 2016, 08:56:10 AM
Quote from: GoLions on June 13, 2016, 11:59:11 PM
Quote from: iZander on June 13, 2016, 11:54:51 PM
I have a question regarding a rule that i thought just made logical sense but today i was told that rule is not the case in worlds so I'm wondering if it is not a rule in British either.

Say for example a you have a midfielder late out and you have two pure defenders on your utilities and no mids on your emergencies but you have a forward or defender with a mid status as well. Does that Fwd/Defender move to the mid spot and your first named emergency come on in the fwd/def?
Nope. You'd get first preference emg oop.
Thanks mate,

That really screws with my head, makes no sense....

But utilities can be moved?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on June 14, 2016, 09:08:32 AM
Utilities can only be moved if they are in the position of the player they are replacing eg a mid must replace mid etc from utility and then first named emergency comes on as utility.
If however your utilities are DPP then they can replace either position and then the first named emergency comes on.

So a nice trick is to name DPP as utilities.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on June 14, 2016, 10:34:15 AM
Quote from: Ringo on June 14, 2016, 09:08:32 AM
Utilities can only be moved if they are in the position of the player they are replacing eg a mid must replace mid etc from utility and then first named emergency comes on as utility.
If however your utilities are DPP then they can replace either position and then the first named emergency comes on.

So a nice trick is to name DPP as utilities.

haha thanks! Glad i found out this rule before it made a difference :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: PowerBug on June 16, 2016, 10:20:40 PM
2016 XVs Champions League (http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,107460.0.html)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on June 18, 2016, 09:42:03 PM
Barlow's 283 wasted :'(
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rusty00 on June 19, 2016, 07:11:08 PM
Tom Bell joins Fyfe and Rough gone for the season :'(
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on June 19, 2016, 07:22:07 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on June 19, 2016, 07:11:08 PM
Tom Bell joins Fyfe and Rough gone for the season :'(
Where did you hear this? :(
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on June 19, 2016, 07:35:15 PM
http://www.lions.com.au/news/2016-06-18/leppa-we-have-to-help-richy

"Leppitsch confirmed midfielder Tom Bell â€" who missed the Eagles match â€" would need to undergo knee surgery and could miss the rest of the season."
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: PowerBug on June 22, 2016, 09:20:53 PM
Managers of:
Liverpool Rams
Winchester Werewolves
Huddersfield Hawks
Hastings Hurricanes
Bradford Badgers
Swansea Breakers
Crosby Cruisers
Nottingham Hoods


Hope to see you all here (http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,107460.0.html) for the live draw of the 2016 Champions League groups. Starts 25th June 8:30pm AEST
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on July 16, 2016, 12:43:04 AM
Fun fact of the day: 43/45 Badgers players have played so far this season (only Shenton and Sier haven't, and Shenton is emg this week so who knows :P). 26 of those average over 100, another 9 over 80 (mainly younger players on the up).

Why am I saying this? Because I am flowering done with this season, and have plenty of depth to hand off in the trade period! ;D
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on July 16, 2016, 08:49:38 AM
Quote from: GoLions on July 16, 2016, 12:43:04 AM
Why am I saying this? Because I am flowering done with this season, and have plenty of depth to hand off in the trade period! ;D

is it too early to start trade talking? :D
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on August 04, 2016, 10:46:29 PM
Badgers Missing Players:

D: Jesse Lonergan, Tom Cutler, Daniel Howe, Ryan Harwood, Sam Butler, Eric Mackenzie, Jason Castagna

M: Dion Prestia, Michael Rischitelli, Tom Liberatore

R: Daniel Currie

F: Michael Barlow, Shaun Higgins, Alex Fasolo

Plus some other depth players. 18 players named in starting 22 this week, with a few on extended bench or emergency.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Pkbaldy on August 05, 2016, 08:01:55 AM
Quote from: GoLions on August 04, 2016, 10:46:29 PM
Badgers Missing Players:

D: Jesse Lonergan, Tom Cutler, Daniel Howe, Ryan Harwood, Sam Butler, Eric Mackenzie, Jason Castagna

M: Dion Prestia, Michael Rischitelli, Tom Liberatore

R: Daniel Currie

F: Michael Barlow, Shaun Higgins, Alex Fasolo

Plus some other depth players. 18 players named in starting 22 this week, with a few on extended bench or emergency.

Straight sets biatch.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on August 08, 2016, 01:55:11 PM
Hi Coaches

As we draw near to the end of the 2016 season we need to start considering 2017.

In order to have a fair trading season it is important that we know what coaches are continuing next year. Should any coach wish to relinquish a team can you PM me or GoLions advising us prior to commencement of trade period. 
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on August 12, 2016, 11:43:58 AM
Just a reminder that all top-up players will be automatically delisted from teams after the GF, and previously suspended Bombers players will return to each person's team
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on August 12, 2016, 11:47:22 AM
Quote from: GoLions on August 12, 2016, 11:43:58 AM
Just a reminder that all top-up players will be automatically delisted from teams after the GF, and previously suspended Bombers players will return to each person's team

I dont want monfries back :(
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on August 12, 2016, 11:49:03 AM
Quote from: iZander on August 12, 2016, 11:47:22 AM
Quote from: GoLions on August 12, 2016, 11:43:58 AM
Just a reminder that all top-up players will be automatically delisted from teams after the GF, and previously suspended Bombers players will return to each person's team

I dont want monfries back :(
You can delist him if you want :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on August 12, 2016, 11:54:29 AM
Quote from: GoLions on August 12, 2016, 11:49:03 AM
Quote from: iZander on August 12, 2016, 11:47:22 AM
Quote from: GoLions on August 12, 2016, 11:43:58 AM
Just a reminder that all top-up players will be automatically delisted from teams after the GF, and previously suspended Bombers players will return to each person's team

I dont want monfries back :(
You can delist him if you want :P
I want my boy Jake Long instead :D
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: LF on August 14, 2016, 11:00:53 PM
Vacant Coaching position available

http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php?topic=107956.msg1797122#msg1797122
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on August 16, 2016, 12:45:05 PM
Cooney retired :(

Was almost a top 10 forward this year (13th), reckon he still could have gone on one more year :-\
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rids on August 16, 2016, 01:12:56 PM
Any update from memph?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on August 16, 2016, 01:33:42 PM
Quote from: Rids on August 16, 2016, 01:12:56 PM
Any update from memph?
^does anyone have irl connection with him?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rids on August 16, 2016, 01:44:27 PM
I will message him on twitter.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on August 16, 2016, 01:46:05 PM
Quote from: Rids on August 16, 2016, 01:44:27 PM
I will message him on twitter.
good guy Rids :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on August 16, 2016, 02:04:50 PM
Thanks Rids - There is a PM to him as well asking his intentions giving him a deadline to reply as per our rules.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rids on August 16, 2016, 02:37:15 PM
Ok. Chatted to Memph who is under the pump at work. He still wants to continue with the XV comps and will look into an assistant coach. Wont be online though until the weekend at the earliest.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on August 16, 2016, 02:41:55 PM
Quote from: Rids on August 16, 2016, 02:37:15 PM
Ok. Chatted to Memph who is under the pump at work. He still wants to continue with the XV comps and will look into an assistant coach. Wont be online though until the weekend at the earliest.
oh boy, if he gets an assistant on the weekend will trade period open monday? :)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rids on August 16, 2016, 02:53:19 PM
Quote from: iZander on August 16, 2016, 02:41:55 PM
Quote from: Rids on August 16, 2016, 02:37:15 PM
Ok. Chatted to Memph who is under the pump at work. He still wants to continue with the XV comps and will look into an assistant coach. Wont be online though until the weekend at the earliest.
oh boy, if he gets an assistant on the weekend will trade period open monday? :)


He wont have an assistant by the weekend. I think he needs to chat to the admins about a way forward that works for everyone. Anyways, hopefully he gets online this weekend to discuss.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: nostradamus on August 16, 2016, 06:04:48 PM
Good to hear Memph still wants to be involved  8)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Nige on August 16, 2016, 07:10:56 PM
Interesting developments!
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on August 22, 2016, 04:10:16 PM
NAT and Rookie draft order (and hence picks) have been finalized
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on August 24, 2016, 12:53:00 PM
ooh NDS, Boomer, Petrie and Firrito not given another contract!!

surprised NDS didn't get another contract :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Pkbaldy on August 24, 2016, 03:47:10 PM
Suck it Dav and Nig.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on August 26, 2016, 03:38:55 PM
Fun fact for you all

British xv's started in 2013 with 18 teams and coaches - We now have 16 teams and with the coaches of Hedgehpgs relinquishing team we only have 3 original coaches remaining.

Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on August 27, 2016, 09:25:26 PM
RILEYYYYYY BONNNNEERRRR, finally debuts :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Torpedo10 on August 27, 2016, 09:31:24 PM
Quote from: Ringo on August 26, 2016, 03:38:55 PM
Fun fact for you all

British xv's started in 2013 with 18 teams and coaches - We now have 16 teams and with the coaches of Hedgehpgs relinquishing team we only have 3 original coaches remaining.
Who are those?  :o
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: T Dog on August 30, 2016, 11:43:24 AM
The Hedgies Board are pleased to announce and welcome its new coaching panel.
Koop and T Dog have combined to take on the British Empire.
Beware the "Koop Kicking T Dogs" is all the brief announcement says.

Please include / copy Koop into all trade discussions.

;D
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rids on August 30, 2016, 12:27:36 PM
Quote from: T Dog on August 30, 2016, 11:43:24 AM
The Hedgies Board are pleased to announce and welcome its new coaching panel.
Koop and T Dog have combined to take on the British Empire.
Beware the "Koop Kicking T Dogs" is all the brief announcement says.

Please include / copy Koop into all trade discussions.

;D


Nice addition! Welcome back to XV Koop.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on August 30, 2016, 02:00:50 PM
Well done Tdog and welcome back Koop,
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Koop on August 30, 2016, 05:17:33 PM
Thanks guys! Came home today to 12 PM's  :o ,  only had 7 previous ones in the last 18 months, so good to be back to the chaos!   ;D

Thankyou to TDog for the opportunity to work under him too!  :D
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on September 03, 2016, 11:08:20 PM
I wish to advise that nrich has relinquished the co-coach position at Swansea Breakers.  Accordingly Ringo will take the reins as sole coach of the Breakers again.
So any future trade offers can be forwarded to me.
I would also like to thank nrich for his assistance to me over the last 3 years.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on September 04, 2016, 07:18:55 PM
Quote from: Ringo on September 03, 2016, 11:08:20 PM
I wish to advise that nrich has relinquished the co-coach position at Swansea Breakers.  Accordingly Ringo will take the reins as sole coach of the Breakers again.
So any future trade offers can be forwarded to me.
I would also like to thank nrich for his assistance to me over the last 3 years.
Damn :-\
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: JBs-Hawks on September 23, 2016, 07:32:17 AM
Jobe coming back :)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on September 28, 2016, 12:35:38 PM
Quote from: Rids on September 28, 2016, 12:19:13 PM
Grope Lane Knights give: Sam Naismith + Nathan Drummond
If you want to change your team name Rids, all you gotta do is ask ;)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rids on September 28, 2016, 01:04:07 PM
Quote from: GoLions on September 28, 2016, 12:35:38 PM
Quote from: Rids on September 28, 2016, 12:19:13 PM
Grope Lane Knights give: Sam Naismith + Nathan Drummond
If you want to change your team name Rids, all you gotta do is ask ;)


Haha. Funny stuff. This is what happens when you get called into work while on leave and trying to get this posted in between tasks.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Pkbaldy on September 28, 2016, 01:06:50 PM
Quote from: Rids on September 28, 2016, 01:04:07 PM
Quote from: GoLions on September 28, 2016, 12:35:38 PM
Quote from: Rids on September 28, 2016, 12:19:13 PM
Grope Lane Knights give: Sam Naismith + Nathan Drummond
If you want to change your team name Rids, all you gotta do is ask ;)


Haha. Funny stuff. This is what happens when you get called into work while on leave and trying to get this posted in between tasks.

Strange enough it fits in well... haha But no chance son :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on September 28, 2016, 01:16:55 PM
Quote from: Rids on September 28, 2016, 01:04:07 PM
Quote from: GoLions on September 28, 2016, 12:35:38 PM
Quote from: Rids on September 28, 2016, 12:19:13 PM
Grope Lane Knights give: Sam Naismith + Nathan Drummond
If you want to change your team name Rids, all you gotta do is ask ;)


Haha. Funny stuff. This is what happens when you get called into work while on leave and trying to get this posted in between tasks.
Next TAC ad, "if you trade and work..." ;D
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Purple 77 on September 30, 2016, 04:43:22 PM
What's this?! A WXV Vacant Coaching Position (http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,108136.0.html)?
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: ossie85 on October 03, 2016, 12:53:19 PM

If interested in the WXV Women's Comp, please apply here:

http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,108140.0.html
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on October 14, 2016, 12:09:43 PM
Boyd signs on for another year, and shall continue to carry the Badgers backline ;D
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on October 30, 2016, 10:30:09 PM
As Tdog has been missing for some 3 weeks I am appointing Koop as interim co-coach. In due course we will need to vote as per rules to make the position permanent,
I am trusting all is well with Tdog and unfortunately I have no other way of contacting him.
Accordingly Koop now has authority to negotiate trades on behalf of the Hedgehogs.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on November 03, 2016, 07:19:10 PM
i think Cloke getting traded actually really hurt tdog
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on November 21, 2016, 12:24:11 AM
If anyone notices anything that seems incorrect in regards to player lists, nat/rookie picks, etc. please let us know asap so everything is good prior to the drafts :)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: SydneyRox on November 22, 2016, 11:30:13 AM
is it just me or does everyone else team lists look the same? no changes?

when i click on my team, i still own JPK and others who I have traded and the guys traded in arent there.

If I search them, they are under the correct teams, but when i open my own team, the list is wrong?

Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on November 22, 2016, 11:34:22 AM
Quote from: SydneyRox on November 22, 2016, 11:30:13 AM
is it just me or does everyone else team lists look the same? no changes?

when i click on my team, i still own JPK and others who I have traded and the guys traded in arent there.

If I search them, they are under the correct teams, but when i open my own team, the list is wrong?
Yeah for some reason your personal team list doesn't update, but the player market and all that does...I don't know why :-X
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Rusty00 on November 22, 2016, 12:33:32 PM
Quote from: GoLions on November 21, 2016, 12:24:11 AM
If anyone notices anything that seems incorrect in regards to player lists, nat/rookie picks, etc. please let us know asap so everything is good prior to the drafts :)
I've struggled to find time to properly scout this year's potential draftees. Can someone give me a copy of their priority list so I can cross-check :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on November 22, 2016, 12:36:02 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on November 22, 2016, 12:33:32 PM
Quote from: GoLions on November 21, 2016, 12:24:11 AM
If anyone notices anything that seems incorrect in regards to player lists, nat/rookie picks, etc. please let us know asap so everything is good prior to the drafts :)
I've struggled to find time to properly scout this year's potential draftees. Can someone give me a copy of their priority list so I can cross-check :P
Your first pick isn't until 33, so just take the player with the best name :P
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on November 22, 2016, 05:34:35 PM
I just to want to acknowledge the great work Go Lions has been doing with British to assist me. Has been a great assistance especially with my busyness over the last 3 months. Thank You.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on November 22, 2016, 07:27:36 PM
No worries Ringo :)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: kilbluff1985 on November 29, 2016, 09:52:54 PM
can a mod delete the old dragons team thread pls
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on November 29, 2016, 09:57:43 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 29, 2016, 09:52:54 PM
can a mod delete the old dragons team thread pls
Have not deleted just modified it to Read Birmingham Dragons History. Similar to other teams so we retain history of teams. 
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: iZander on January 30, 2017, 05:42:19 PM
Not by some ;) http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-01-30/who-is-the-afls-most-underrated-player (http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-01-30/who-is-the-afls-most-underrated-player)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on February 01, 2017, 07:24:26 PM
Aware there are some issues with UF and we are trying to sort out.
In the meantime if not done so go into UF select British and your team and click on players to retain.  Should be all on your list except possible some draft picks. Save but says league Manager to Authorise which we will be sorting out.
A few other issues as well.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on February 02, 2017, 02:18:41 PM
http://footyprophet.com/ultimate-footy-opens-for-2017-who-has-gained-dpp/

For information additional DPP in UF. Initial listing.
Jackson Trengove (PA â€" R) added B
Daniel Rich (BL â€" C) added B
Tendai Mzungu (GWS â€" C) added B
Brendan Whitecross (HW â€" F) added B
Mitch Brown (ES â€" F) added B
Caleb Daniel (WB â€" F) added C
Shaun Burgoyne (HW â€" B) added C
Allen Christensen (BL â€" F) added C
Kurt Tippett (SY â€" R) added F

GL must be celebrating now.  ;)

Still sorting through the issues with rolling teams and being away tomorrow and saturday may not resolve till next week.  main issue at the moment is League Commissioner which we are endeavouring to sort out so we then can get to our customised scoring.

Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on February 02, 2017, 02:27:03 PM
Why am I celebrating? Mid status for Caleb doesn't really help me as I'm gonna play him forward anyway :P

Kupa, Zander, and PK should all be fairly happy though haha
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Torpedo10 on February 04, 2017, 11:10:19 AM
Welcoming Uncleswagy to the Manchester team as an assistant!
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: GoLions on February 04, 2017, 11:14:11 AM
Welcome swagy!
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: nas on February 04, 2017, 11:25:25 AM
Quote from: GoLions on February 04, 2017, 11:14:11 AM
Welcome swagy!
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: uncleswagy on February 04, 2017, 05:34:52 PM
Hey guys! glad to be part of the magic, cant wait to get into it
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on February 04, 2017, 08:20:21 PM
Welcome Swagy - Great to have new assistant coach new to the forum as well.  Enjoy.
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: PowerBug on February 07, 2017, 05:21:50 PM
Could someone please post the top 8 teams from BXVs last season in finishing order post-finals and including the manager(s) names. When two teams got knocked out in the same week the one higher on the ladder goes first. Cheers :)
Title: Re: 2016 British xv Discussion thread
Post by: Ringo on February 07, 2017, 05:26:23 PM
Quote from: PowerBug on February 07, 2017, 05:21:50 PM
Could someone please post the top 8 teams from BXVs last season in finishing order post-finals and including the manager(s) names. When two teams got knocked out in the same week the one higher on the ladder goes first. Cheers :)

(https://i.gyazo.com/89351e8c1466301f74b1fdf9cfe56a4c.png)

Ladder as requested