Main Menu

CAS verdict

Started by Drak, December 15, 2015, 10:59:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bill Manspeaker

yeah that is some bullshower

Quote from: Grazz on March 05, 2016, 10:14:56 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on March 05, 2016, 10:03:19 PM
Whos gonna police that though?

There'd be some White Goodman there willing to dob him in I bet.
wouldn't surprise me either. always some dickhead like this out there

quinny88

He's allowed to go to games to watch, he just can't coach.
He couldn't go to that 1 tac cup game because it was at Essendons training base

Gigantor

Quote from: quinny88 on March 06, 2016, 03:31:35 AM
He's allowed to go to games to watch, he just can't coach.
He couldn't go to that 1 tac cup game because it was at Essendons training base

I should have known better than believe the media, so he can watch his son play as long as he doesn't coach and the game is at Tullamarine, that seems fair to me.

Ziplock

Quote from: Gigantor on March 06, 2016, 11:34:04 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on March 06, 2016, 03:31:35 AM
He's allowed to go to games to watch, he just can't coach.
He couldn't go to that 1 tac cup game because it was at Essendons training base

I should have known better than believe the media, so he can watch his son play as long as he doesn't coach and the game is at Tullamarine, that seems fair to me.

doesn't seem too rough to me, got a bit twisted by the media?

Grazz

Good to hear that he can actually watch his son, the frustration I had with WADA just shifted to the media, again surprise surprise.
Anyway happy for Fletch and his son.

Grazz

Four Corners ran a show showing Hal Hunters efforts to find out what he was given over 12-18 months of trying.
The episode is called Whatever It Takes.

http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2016/03/21/4426753.htm

Ringo

Quote from: Grazz on March 22, 2016, 06:36:18 PM
Four Corners ran a show showing Hal Hunters efforts to find out what he was given over 12-18 months of trying.
The episode is called Whatever It Takes.

http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2016/03/21/4426753.htm
was very interesting watch. Was undecided whether to post here or not as did want to revisit and open old wounds.  But the club is definitely painted in bad light especially pursuit of Legal fees.  We know though that reporting can sometimes be biased for a story though.


Ricochet


T Dog



Ricochet

Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 15, 2016, 12:40:47 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on September 15, 2016, 09:00:38 AM
I'll just leave this here

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-18/holmes-afl-spring-clean/5031326?pfmredir=sm
When was that written?
Its nothing new, was talk about the other clubs for years but flower all in the media about it

This article resurfaced today

ossie85

Yeah, nothing new

There's also nothing inheritantly wrong with a supplement program either.

Where it gets murky is if you don't document it and the players don't report it.

There's no suggestion that the other clubs didn't have proper records and players didn't act appropriately. Agree more questions and transparency probably should have been asked.

In any case, even if the worse case scenario that all other 17 teams were just like Essendon, implying that Essendon should be excused because 'everyone else was doing it' is silly.

kilbluff1985

no Essendon shouldn't be excused

but why were the other clubs not investigated

Ricochet

Yeh certainly not suggesting Essendon should be excused but how can there be nothing in the media about other clubs supplement programs. I've personally heard about it plenty over the years but theres been little in the media