Main Menu

EURO Trading

Started by Holz, September 03, 2012, 12:52:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ziplock

carrazzo is old + mid only, horsely, moloney are average. Hmac injury prone.

really only leaves birch of real value :P

Justin Bieber

Yeah what was it?? :( lol

The F.A.R.K.

Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 24, 2012, 07:36:47 PM
Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on October 24, 2012, 03:59:02 PM
Quote from: picker_man on October 24, 2012, 03:56:18 PM
Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on October 24, 2012, 12:01:00 AM
Quote from: picker_man on October 23, 2012, 06:17:32 PM
Haha glad im not the only one. Good old FARK, Weve been chattin for ages (like 2 months) trying to get a deal done ive also had some crackin offers along the way

Moloney + rookie 2 + 9 + 35 for Cotchin + Selwood

Podsiadlly + varcoe + rookie 9 for Selwood + nat 35

moloney / horsley + rookie9 and 35 for selwood

He's one tough negotiator

*has it been confirmed we are having a 2nd trade period?? About to start negotiations with a coach but prolly best i get it confirmed first :)

never offered this you said you wanted an experienced fwd so i said i can offer pods or varcoe or blair
i.e moloney + fwd + pick 9 for selwood


you said no

Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on October 22, 2012, 08:52:20 PM
Quote from: picker_man on October 22, 2012, 08:51:17 PM

well can do podsiadlly or moloney + rook 9 + varcoe for selwood + pick 35 nat

Maybe i cant read properly wouldnt surprise me ;D but prietty sure that says pods + rookie 9 + varcoe for selwood + nat 35......

Apolagise you did say or moloney but he's in nearly every offer you send me :P
I dont care i love talkin trades but yeah you did send me it ;)

well you said you are looking for an experienced fwd i said we could do varcoe and you said meh then i said well can do pods as in reference to the ast deal, then offered you a new deal



oh well at least torps is trying to do trades

in saying that can someone please flowering give us a flowering midfielder who ave 100+

flooooooooooooooower

I have put birchall carrazo hmac top 10 rookie picks moloney horsley ect ect all out there with nothing

Daniel cross for birchall

stevens at wb how will this effect his role. soory no thanks birchall def ave 90 mark cross ave just a shade under 100 and is older...we want 100+ av mids

JBs-Hawks


The F.A.R.K.

Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 25, 2012, 01:19:03 AM
Hayes?

hayes is old. im interested in watson or thompson. maybe boak but not straight for birchall

elephants

Or some bloke called Ablett. Kind of a unique though, ever heard of him?

Justin Bieber

Quote from: elephants on October 25, 2012, 02:30:07 AM
Or some bloke called Ablett. Kind of a unique though, ever heard of him?

Nathan?

Scrads

What happens Holz if Tippett gets de-registered for a year ? :(

elephants


Ziplock

Quote from: Scrads on October 25, 2012, 03:38:56 PM
What happens Holz if Tippett gets de-registered for a year ? :(

I would personally vote that he stays on your team list, but takes up a spot so you'll effectively have a squad 1 player short.... for the euros I think it should just be treated like a years suspension.

or you could delist him. :P

elephants

Quote from: Ziplock on October 25, 2012, 06:29:16 PM
Quote from: Scrads on October 25, 2012, 03:38:56 PM
What happens Holz if Tippett gets de-registered for a year ? :(

I would personally vote that he stays on your team list, but takes up a spot so you'll effectively have a squad 1 player short.... for the euros I think it should just be treated like a years suspension.

or you could delist him. :P

It seems harsh but I tend to agree.

picker_man

If moloney is going to ave 90 cause he's goin to the lions then Rodan will ave 100 now he's of to the demons FARK so

Rodan for Birchall  ;)

elephants

Quote from: picker_man on October 25, 2012, 06:48:35 PM
If moloney is going to ave 90 cause he's goin to the lions then Rodan will ave 100 now he's of to the demons FARK so

Rodan for Birchall  ;)

Your theory is so very flawed haha.

Rodan best average = 71 (two knee reco's since then)
Moloney best average = 88.4 (also has 81, 88 and 85 over the past 4 years.

Rodan moving down from 14th placed club (Port) to 16th placed club (Dees).
Moloney moving up from 16th placed club (Dees) to 13th placed club (Lions).

Rodan hasn't played a full season since 2008.
Moloney played every match in 2011.

Rodan is 30 next year.
Moloney is 29.

They're incomparable mate hahaha!

JBs-Hawks

Quote from: elephants on October 25, 2012, 07:48:44 PM
Quote from: picker_man on October 25, 2012, 06:48:35 PM
If moloney is going to ave 90 cause he's goin to the lions then Rodan will ave 100 now he's of to the demons FARK so

Rodan for Birchall  ;)

Your theory is so very flawed haha.

Rodan best average = 71 (two knee reco's since then)
Moloney best average = 88.4 (also has 81, 88 and 85 over the past 4 years.

Rodan moving down from 14th placed club (Port) to 16th placed club (Dees).
Moloney moving up from 16th placed club (Dees) to 13th placed club (Lions).

Rodan hasn't played a full season since 2008.
Moloney played every match in 2011.

Rodan is 30 next year.
Moloney is 29.

They're incomparable mate hahaha!

But you just compared them  ::)

elephants

Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 25, 2012, 07:53:13 PM
Quote from: elephants on October 25, 2012, 07:48:44 PM
Quote from: picker_man on October 25, 2012, 06:48:35 PM
If moloney is going to ave 90 cause he's goin to the lions then Rodan will ave 100 now he's of to the demons FARK so

Rodan for Birchall  ;)

Your theory is so very flawed haha.

Rodan best average = 71 (two knee reco's since then)
Moloney best average = 88.4 (also has 81, 88 and 85 over the past 4 years.

Rodan moving down from 14th placed club (Port) to 16th placed club (Dees).
Moloney moving up from 16th placed club (Dees) to 13th placed club (Lions).

Rodan hasn't played a full season since 2008.
Moloney played every match in 2011.

Rodan is 30 next year.
Moloney is 29.

They're incomparable mate hahaha!

But you just compared them  ::)

But clearly Moloney is far superior so what's the point? I only did it to show Pickers how pointless it is ::)