The weekend has started with an average bench score,
Greenwood 90 dragged down with a couple of clangers in last 10 minutes bringing into doubt. Will Scooter score 90 against the Pies?
Guess it depends on your opposition and the matchups? Scooter loves SS, with majority of his scores over 100 there. Yet to play at the G and with an average of 86.3 (83.6 last 5 rounds) I would go with the old bird in the hand philosophy. Not that it means anything, but his two low scores were at AO 46 and DS 44! With his bros out of the side, it seems he is finding more of the footy perhaps? A real 50/50 this one. Sorry for being so ambiguous!
I have my own conundrum. Do I take Lloyds 81 or go for gold with Scharenberg in the hope he scores higher? Has been good the past few weeks with scores of 82, 99, 86! Really need these little wins to get me over the line after I brought Neale in last week for Selwood and ........ well you know what happened then!
Quote from: igotworms on August 19, 2017, 09:38:29 AM
Guess it depends on your opposition and the matchups? Scooter loves SS, with majority of his scores over 100 there. Yet to play at the G and with an average of 86.3 (83.6 last 5 rounds) I would go with the old bird in the hand philosophy. Not that it means anything, but his two low scores were at AO 46 and DS 44! With his bros out of the side, it seems he is finding more of the footy perhaps? A real 50/50 this one. Sorry for being so ambiguous!
I have my own conundrum. Do I take Lloyds 81 or go for gold with Scharenberg in the hope he scores higher? Has been good the past few weeks with scores of 82, 99, 86! Really need these little wins to get me over the line after I brought Neale in last week for Selwood and ........ well you know what happened then!
Berg should see quite a bit of the ball in feelings forward line. Will he have to be more accountable with Goldsack out though? I would stick with Lloyds 81.
I've got a couple..
Shaw vs Berg?
Greenwood's 90 vs Dahl?
Quote from: tkringle on August 19, 2017, 10:10:34 AM
Quote from: igotworms on August 19, 2017, 09:38:29 AM
Guess it depends on your opposition and the matchups? Scooter loves SS, with majority of his scores over 100 there. Yet to play at the G and with an average of 86.3 (83.6 last 5 rounds) I would go with the old bird in the hand philosophy. Not that it means anything, but his two low scores were at AO 46 and DS 44! With his bros out of the side, it seems he is finding more of the footy perhaps? A real 50/50 this one. Sorry for being so ambiguous!
I have my own conundrum. Do I take Lloyds 81 or go for gold with Scharenberg in the hope he scores higher? Has been good the past few weeks with scores of 82, 99, 86! Really need these little wins to get me over the line after I brought Neale in last week for Selwood and ........ well you know what happened then!
Berg should see quite a bit of the ball in feelings forward line. Will he have to be more accountable with Goldsack out though? I would stick with Lloyds 81.
I've got a couple..
Shaw vs Berg?
Greenwood's 90 vs Dahl?
Berg and Greenwood
Greenswood 90 or dahl, nank or nroo
Quote from: wetDT on August 19, 2017, 11:01:11 AM
Greenswood 90 or dahl, nank or nroo
Similar boat myself, Higgins vs. Nank vs. Dahl vs. Greenwood's 90.
Considering Dahlhaus in all honesty, only scored above 90 once in the last 7 weeks.
Quote from: wetDT on August 19, 2017, 11:01:11 AM
Greenswood 90 or dahl, nank or nroo
I had the same issue, apart from Nank.
I think Nroo could be set for a big one against the Roos, so benching Dahl his form has been pretty ordinary lately
I'm taking Greenwoods 90 and benching Nank so you can bet Nank will pull out a monster :P
Bank Schaz 91?
Or play Wither or Ryan?
Would bank it can not see Withers or Ryan going much over if they do.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 19, 2017, 05:49:20 PM
Bank Schaz 91?
Or play Wither or Ryan?
My "zero" Connor Glass is now playing so can't loophole Schaz.
Who to play - Withers (at MCG v Demons) or Ryan (at Domain v Tigers)
Was able to loop Gawn and Greenwood, free 12 points #littlewins