CHAMPIONS LEAGUE GROUP STAGES

Started by Holz, April 03, 2013, 12:38:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

LaHug

It's because the season has started in general with significantly lower DT scores than you'd expect but the SC scores are quite high...

LaHug

Belarus Bison

Def: P. Duffield 75, H. Taylor 31, T. Chaplin 93, J. Russell 71
Mid: S. Mitchell (C) 218, J. Kelly 85, D. Armitage 75, D. Mundy (VC) 70
Ruc: S. Jacobs 82
Fwd: D. Zorko 75, T. Rockliff 77, J. Roughead 72, C. Sylvia 33
Util: D. Jackson 67, J. Bolton 72

Score: 1057

ossie85

Quote from: LaHug on April 08, 2013, 01:08:16 PM
It's because the season has started in general with significantly lower DT scores than you'd expect but the SC scores are quite high...

DT scores maybe low, but SC scores are constant - only 3300 available for each match.

As Worlds Admin, I'll protest changing the rules to back my boys up! Surely the huge differentials show they are more dominant?

Holz

Quote from: ossie85 on April 08, 2013, 01:54:15 PM
Quote from: LaHug on April 08, 2013, 01:08:16 PM
It's because the season has started in general with significantly lower DT scores than you'd expect but the SC scores are quite high...

DT scores maybe low, but SC scores are constant - only 3300 available for each match.

As Worlds Admin, I'll protest changing the rules to back my boys up! Surely the huge differentials show they are more dominant?

I will look into it, i was thinking just dropping the 2 lowest averages and the 2 best. Will probably keep it the same though. Will do the numbers in the afternoon and get the results up shoortly.

the hugr SD in the worlds is a worry though the difference between the best and worst team is crazy.


LaHug

Quote from: ossie85 on April 08, 2013, 01:54:15 PM
Quote from: LaHug on April 08, 2013, 01:08:16 PM
It's because the season has started in general with significantly lower DT scores than you'd expect but the SC scores are quite high...

DT scores maybe low, but SC scores are constant - only 3300 available for each match.

As Worlds Admin, I'll protest changing the rules to back my boys up! Surely the huge differentials show they are more dominant?
I more meant that the good players seem to be scoring particularly highly. If there are 3300 points available and the bottom 22 in a game all score 50 points, that leaves 2200 points for the top 22. Not sure how well I'm explaining what I'm trying to say but I'm sure you get the gist...

ossie85


Fair point LaHug, the superstars are especially super at the moment

nostradamus

Just out of curiosity, what are the actual results guys?

nostradamus

Quote from: Holzman on April 08, 2013, 01:56:50 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on April 08, 2013, 01:54:15 PM
Quote from: LaHug on April 08, 2013, 01:08:16 PM
It's because the season has started in general with significantly lower DT scores than you'd expect but the SC scores are quite high...

DT scores maybe low, but SC scores are constant - only 3300 available for each match.

As Worlds Admin, I'll protest changing the rules to back my boys up! Surely the huge differentials show they are more dominant?

I will look into it, i was thinking just dropping the 2 lowest averages and the 2 best. Will probably keep it the same though. Will do the numbers in the afternoon and get the results up shoortly.

the hugr SD in the worlds is a worry though the difference between the best and worst team is crazy.

l think the best way to achieve parity would be to look at the averages from last year of only the teams that are involved in this championship. That way it avoids the distortion of the very weak teams in any particular league

Holz

Quote from: nostradamus on April 08, 2013, 03:17:11 PM
Quote from: Holzman on April 08, 2013, 01:56:50 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on April 08, 2013, 01:54:15 PM
Quote from: LaHug on April 08, 2013, 01:08:16 PM
It's because the season has started in general with significantly lower DT scores than you'd expect but the SC scores are quite high...

DT scores maybe low, but SC scores are constant - only 3300 available for each match.

As Worlds Admin, I'll protest changing the rules to back my boys up! Surely the huge differentials show they are more dominant?

I will look into it, i was thinking just dropping the 2 lowest averages and the 2 best. Will probably keep it the same though. Will do the numbers in the afternoon and get the results up shoortly.

the hugr SD in the worlds is a worry though the difference between the best and worst team is crazy.

l think the best way to achieve parity would be to look at the averages from last year of only the teams that are involved in this championship. That way it avoids the distortion of the very weak teams in any particular league

aahh very clever nost.

Nails

Quote from: Holzman on April 08, 2013, 03:20:28 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on April 08, 2013, 03:17:11 PM
Quote from: Holzman on April 08, 2013, 01:56:50 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on April 08, 2013, 01:54:15 PM
Quote from: LaHug on April 08, 2013, 01:08:16 PM
It's because the season has started in general with significantly lower DT scores than you'd expect but the SC scores are quite high...

DT scores maybe low, but SC scores are constant - only 3300 available for each match.

As Worlds Admin, I'll protest changing the rules to back my boys up! Surely the huge differentials show they are more dominant?

I will look into it, i was thinking just dropping the 2 lowest averages and the 2 best. Will probably keep it the same though. Will do the numbers in the afternoon and get the results up shoortly.

the hugr SD in the worlds is a worry though the difference between the best and worst team is crazy.

l think the best way to achieve parity would be to look at the averages from last year of only the teams that are involved in this championship. That way it avoids the distortion of the very weak teams in any particular league

aahh very clever nost.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkBQ4xUHAUA

^ That is a video about nost.

Well mostly the first 15 seconds really.

nostradamus

Quote from: Nails on April 08, 2013, 03:23:57 PM
Quote from: Holzman on April 08, 2013, 03:20:28 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on April 08, 2013, 03:17:11 PM
Quote from: Holzman on April 08, 2013, 01:56:50 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on April 08, 2013, 01:54:15 PM
Quote from: LaHug on April 08, 2013, 01:08:16 PM
It's because the season has started in general with significantly lower DT scores than you'd expect but the SC scores are quite high...

DT scores maybe low, but SC scores are constant - only 3300 available for each match.

As Worlds Admin, I'll protest changing the rules to back my boys up! Surely the huge differentials show they are more dominant?

I will look into it, i was thinking just dropping the 2 lowest averages and the 2 best. Will probably keep it the same though. Will do the numbers in the afternoon and get the results up shoortly.

the hugr SD in the worlds is a worry though the difference between the best and worst team is crazy.

l think the best way to achieve parity would be to look at the averages from last year of only the teams that are involved in this championship. That way it avoids the distortion of the very weak teams in any particular league

aahh very clever nost.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkBQ4xUHAUA

^ That is a video about nost.

Well mostly the first 15 seconds really.

that cracked me up Nails .........very funny mate  ;D

DazBurg

Quote from: Nails on April 08, 2013, 03:23:57 PM
Quote from: Holzman on April 08, 2013, 03:20:28 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on April 08, 2013, 03:17:11 PM
Quote from: Holzman on April 08, 2013, 01:56:50 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on April 08, 2013, 01:54:15 PM
Quote from: LaHug on April 08, 2013, 01:08:16 PM
It's because the season has started in general with significantly lower DT scores than you'd expect but the SC scores are quite high...

DT scores maybe low, but SC scores are constant - only 3300 available for each match.

As Worlds Admin, I'll protest changing the rules to back my boys up! Surely the huge differentials show they are more dominant?

I will look into it, i was thinking just dropping the 2 lowest averages and the 2 best. Will probably keep it the same though. Will do the numbers in the afternoon and get the results up shoortly.

the hugr SD in the worlds is a worry though the difference between the best and worst team is crazy.

l think the best way to achieve parity would be to look at the averages from last year of only the teams that are involved in this championship. That way it avoids the distortion of the very weak teams in any particular league

aahh very clever nost.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkBQ4xUHAUA

^ That is a video about nost.

Well mostly the first 15 seconds really.
LOL Gold Nails
love it great call
love the movie too  ;D

Holz

#57
Sao Paulo Pumas 21.16 142 defeated Spanish Stallions 19.15 129

Greek Titans 16.14 110 defeated Wellington Warriors 15.14 104

Macedonian Wolves 20.14 134 defeated Toronto Wolves 19.15 129 

Buenos Aires Armadillos 21.17 143 defeated Iceland Polar Bears 17.15 117

Mexico City Suns 26.15 171  defeated Belgian Bashers 18.15 123

Russian Roulette's 20.18 138 defeated Beijing Bears14.13 97
 
Sweddish Metal 23.13 151 defeated Moscow Spetsnaz 18.16 124

Cape Town Cobras 20.21 141  defeated Belarus Bisons 16.13 109



thats 4 wins to the euro and 4 wins the worlds. Amazingly all the higher ranking teams won.

nostradamus

Wow!! Mexico's score is very impressive, it's hard to see anyone competing with them if they keep that standard up

......but watch out guys, l cant see Ablett & Swan both having ordinary games at the same time again

elephants

Haha damn, we need Daisy/Hmac/Stanley back!!