Round 1 progressive scores

Started by LF, March 23, 2017, 11:09:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

meow meow

197 from Murphy and fkn Rance. Didn't pick SPS. Have Butler and Pickett on bench.

Kreuzer looked good!

enzedder

239/3 Nank, Marchbank, and Pickett. Would've rather been 308/3 with Butler who is on my bench.

SilverLion

2/210

Nank and Butler

Can't complain so far ;D

Mat0369

354 from 4. Simmo, Doc, Marchbank and SPS

Carn

197/2 started butler, marchbank

LordSneeze

270/3
Rance, Nank & Marchbank

Rance ill take after he was on 8 at half time.

NoButYeah

5/457 Nank, Marchbank, Butler, Doc and Rance. Happy with most and Rance from half a game wasn't bad

Ricochet

Quote from: SilverLion on March 24, 2017, 08:34:50 AM
2/210

Nank and Butler

Can't complain so far ;D
^^

Couldn't fit Marchbank in so missed one there but happy with that so far

crowls

Cannot believe people paid 535k for Rancid.      KPP,  high variability versus Def who will be spending bulk of time in mids.   

TomK

Quote from: crowls on March 24, 2017, 11:15:56 AM
Cannot believe people paid 535k for Rancid.      KPP,  high variability versus Def who will be spending bulk of time in mids.   
Name all these other defenders who are playing midfield not including Laird who everyone has and Adams who is a major injury risk?

crowls

Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2017, 11:19:17 AM
Quote from: crowls on March 24, 2017, 11:15:56 AM
Cannot believe people paid 535k for Rancid.      KPP,  high variability versus Def who will be spending bulk of time in mids.   
Name all these other defenders who are playing midfield not including Laird who everyone has and Adams who is a major injury risk?
Macmillan, vince, LLoyd

TomK

Quote from: crowls on March 24, 2017, 11:22:58 AM
Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2017, 11:19:17 AM
Quote from: crowls on March 24, 2017, 11:15:56 AM
Cannot believe people paid 535k for Rancid.      KPP,  high variability versus Def who will be spending bulk of time in mids.   
Name all these other defenders who are playing midfield not including Laird who everyone has and Adams who is a major injury risk?
Macmillan, vince, LLoyd
why would I start any of them over Rance

LordSneeze

Quote from: crowls on March 24, 2017, 11:22:58 AM
Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2017, 11:19:17 AM
Quote from: crowls on March 24, 2017, 11:15:56 AM
Cannot believe people paid 535k for Rancid.      KPP,  high variability versus Def who will be spending bulk of time in mids.   
Name all these other defenders who are playing midfield not including Laird who everyone has and Adams who is a major injury risk?
Macmillan, vince, LLoyd

None of those are playing Bulk Mid and I wouldn't take any of them over Rance.

Rance should be a lock for a top 10 defender average. Like all players he is prone to poor games, it took until 2 mins before the end of the 1st half before he got his first mark & possession. Yet he still managed to score 59.
Im still expecting a 90-95 average minimum

Grufflez

90 wouldn't be a good starting average for 535k you would want 95+
Rance actually scored more last year in loses IIRC when the ball was down there a lot more.
Richmond have a good early draw.

Rance a decent trade in option approaching the byes i reckon.

Grufflez

Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2017, 11:24:11 AM
Quote from: crowls on March 24, 2017, 11:22:58 AM
Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2017, 11:19:17 AM
Quote from: crowls on March 24, 2017, 11:15:56 AM
Cannot believe people paid 535k for Rancid.      KPP,  high variability versus Def who will be spending bulk of time in mids.   
Name all these other defenders who are playing midfield not including Laird who everyone has and Adams who is a major injury risk?
Macmillan, vince, LLoyd
why would I start any of them over Rance

Maybe not them but Doch,Simo,Shaw,Laird are all capable of 105 type averages Shaw more even, at not much more of a spend than Rance.

In a year where the backs look full of high scorers why would you settle for 95 at 535k?