The Trade period will work as follows:
Trade Period 1
Starts: After the Official Draft is complete
Ends: At the start of the National Draft
Trades: You may have up to 5 list changes, meaning that after you have finished drafting in the official draft that you can only add or take five players/draft picks from your list. However if you get a player and then on trade that same player for another player it will still only count as 1 list change.
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Please post all trades here.
Note: For a trade to be confirmed both parties must post the trade here.
Trades passed
1. Threeway trade
Holzman - Boyd + Betts + Picker_man's 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
picker_man - Christensen + Holzman's 2nd,3rd nat draft pick + Ward + Hawka's 3rd nat draft pick
Hawka - Shiels + Fasolo + Holzman's 1st nat draft pick
Decision - Accepted
4. Spinking and Colliwobblers
Spinking gets: J Selwood + National Draft picks 49 (Rnd3) and 60 (Rnd4)
Colliwobblers gets: J Redden + National Draft picks 9 (Rnd1) and 28 (Rnd2)
Decision - Accepted
6. Torpedo10 and Monstrum
Torpedo10 Gives: Harry Taylor, Chris Masten
Monstrum Gives: David Swallow, Mzungu
Verdict - Accepted
7. Holzman and Torpedo10
Holz Recives: Lance Franklin, T.Mzungu
Torp Recieves: Andrew Swallow, E.Betts
Verdict - Accepted
Trade 11 - Nails and Torpedo10
Nails gives NAT draft picks: 4, 33 and 40
Torp gives: David Swallow and his 2nd and 3rd round Pre-Season Draft Pick
Assessment - Passed
Trades being assessed
Number of movements per person
BB67th -
Boomz -
Colliwobblers - 1
Elephants -
Fletch74 -
Hawka - 2
Holzman - 3
JBs-Hawks -
Monstrum - 2
MTTY -
Nails - 1
Noz -
picker_man - 2
Ringo -
Spinking - 1
Tabs -
Torpedo10 - 5
Whatlez -
Only 5 changes? Wasn't it 7 in euros+worlds? I think it should be 7.
Torp this was the rules made before hand. Do not argue.
I think 5 is enough. If you want more than obviously you drafted poorly ;)
after working mine out im making 7 trades but only 5 list changes ;D
I'll start off im trading with Holz and Hawka ;D
Holz is getting - Boyd + Betts + my 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
I get off Holz - Christensen + his 1st,2nd,3rd nat draft picks
Hawka is getting - Shiels + Fasolo + Holz's 1st nat draft pick
Iget off Hawka - Ward + his 3rd nat draft pick + his 4th nat draft
that might be hard to understand sorry but im losing
BOYD + BETTS + SHIELS + FASOLO + 4TH NAT DRAFT PICK
and recieve
WARD + CHRISTENSEN + 2ND NAT DRAFT + 3RD NAT DRAFT + 3RD NAT DRAFT PICK
;D
,
The Hebden Bridge Hedgehogs would like to inform the rest of the world that ALL of their players are up for negotiations. Obviously, some will be harder to capture than others but the coaching staff consisting of myself, Ric and Spite are willing to listen to all offers.
Here is our team: http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,63090.0.html
We are in the market for strong fwds and another solid midfielder.
Quote from: picker_man on September 02, 2012, 01:11:01 PM
after working mine out im making 7 trades but only 5 list changes ;D
I'll start off im trading with Holz and Hawka ;D
Holz is getting - Boyd + Betts + my 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
I get off Holz - Christensen + his 1st,2nd,3rd nat draft picks
Hawka is getting - Shiels + Fasolo + Holz's 1st nat draft pick
Iget off Hawka - Ward + his 3rd nat draft pick + his 4th nat draft
that might be hard to understand sorry but im losing
BOYD + BETTS + SHIELS + FASOLO + 4TH NAT DRAFT PICK
and recieve
WARD + CHRISTENSEN + 2ND NAT DRAFT + 3RD NAT DRAFT + 3RD NAT DRAFT PICK
;D
,
I dont see the trades as being possible, as you would have to make one of the trades first (either the one with Holz or Hawka) of which eitherway you do not have all the components of the trade.
E.g.
If you do the Holz trade first
Holz is getting - Boyd + Betts + my 4th nat draft pick +
Hawka's 4th nat draft pickI get off Holz - Christensen + his 1st,2nd,3rd nat draft picks
Bold = You do not have on your list yet.
Or if you do Hawka's trade first
Hawka is getting - Shiels + Fasolo +
Holz's 1st nat draft pickI get off Hawka - Ward + his 3rd nat draft pick + his 4th nat draft
Therefore Holz or Hawka would be unable to confirm the trades.
Everyone is up for sale cept Matera, Cotchin, Barlow, Prestia and maybe Griffen
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,62866.0.html
??? why cant the trades just go through at the same time..... i thought the whole point of on trading a player to another team was to keep your trades down
Backs
Andrew Carrazzo
Robert Murphy
Adam Selwood
Rhyce Shaw
Alex Johnson
Dustin Fletcher
Tom Jonas
Matthew Jaensch
Easton Wood
Stephen Wrigley
Cameron Delaney
Jed Bews
Mids
Scott Thompson
Nick Dal Santo
James Kelly
Jack Steven
Sharrod Wellingham
Kyal Horsely
Jaeger O'Mera
Kane Lucas
Callum Bartlett
Cameron Ellis-Yoleman
Rucks
Jonathan Griffin
Hamish McIntosh
Mike Pyke
Forwards
Travis Cloke
Taylor Walker
Jarred Waite
Ahmed Saad
Daniel Giansiracusa
Terry Milera
Gary Rohan
Tim McIntyre
Lewis Johnstone
Tommy Walsh
Jack Redpath
Brett O'Hanlon
Everyone is up for sale
Quote from: MTTY on September 02, 2012, 01:44:19 PM
Quote from: picker_man on September 02, 2012, 01:11:01 PM
after working mine out im making 7 trades but only 5 list changes ;D
I'll start off im trading with Holz and Hawka ;D
Holz is getting - Boyd + Betts + my 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
I get off Holz - Christensen + his 1st,2nd,3rd nat draft picks
Hawka is getting - Shiels + Fasolo + Holz's 1st nat draft pick
Iget off Hawka - Ward + his 3rd nat draft pick + his 4th nat draft
that might be hard to understand sorry but im losing
BOYD + BETTS + SHIELS + FASOLO + 4TH NAT DRAFT PICK
and recieve
WARD + CHRISTENSEN + 2ND NAT DRAFT + 3RD NAT DRAFT + 3RD NAT DRAFT PICK
;D
,
I dont see the trades as being possible, as you would have to make one of the trades first (either the one with Holz or Hawka) of which eitherway you do not have all the components of the trade.
E.g.
If you do the Holz trade first
Holz is getting - Boyd + Betts + my 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
I get off Holz - Christensen + his 1st,2nd,3rd nat draft picks
Bold = You do not have on your list yet.
Or if you do Hawka's trade first
Hawka is getting - Shiels + Fasolo + Holz's 1st nat draft pick
I get off Hawka - Ward + his 3rd nat draft pick + his 4th nat draft
Therefore Holz or Hawka would be unable to confirm the trades.
Isn't that called a 3 way trade?
not sure torp but i really cant see anything wrong with it..... :-\
so you saying i cant do them MTTY even if hawka and holz both agree??
| Defenders | | Jack Grimes | | Garrick Ibbotson | | Reece Conca | | Will Schofield | | Paul Stewart | | Ashley Smith | | Matthew Watson | | Tom Logan | | Andrejs Everitt | | Eric MacKenzie | | Richard Tambling | | David Astbury | | Michael Coad | | Patrick McCarthy |
|
| Midfielders | | Brad Ebert | | Mitch Wallis | | David Ellard | | Liam Anthony | | Rhys Palmer | | Brock McLean | | Jordie McKenzie | | Elliot Yeo | | Jordan Gysberts | | Brad Dalzeill |
|
| Ruckmen | | Matthew Leuenberger | | Billy Longer | | Ben Hudson |
|
| Forwards | | Danny Stanley | | Matthew Wright | | Jonathon Brown | | Tory Dickson | | Ricky Petterd | | Chris Knights | | Tyrone Vickery | | Jarrad Grant | | Liam Patrick | | Patrick Veszpremi | | Luke Power |
|
ALL Players are up for trade. Best to contact via: PM
Team thread: http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,65825.0.html
Quote from: picker_man on September 02, 2012, 01:49:27 PM
??? why cant the trades just go through at the same time..... i thought the whole point of on trading a player to another team was to keep your trades down
That is the point. As Torp says a threeway trade can be used here, so its as simply as getting all three parties to agree at the same time. ALL three parties must agree though. Apologies as i should have said that in my original reply.
Defenders
Brett Deledio (D/C)
Greg Broughton
Michael Johnson
Nick Malceski
Daniel Merrett
Tom Williams
Jeremy Laidler
Luke McGuane
Josh Tynan
Alex Silvagni
James Hawksley
Midfielders
Luke Shuey
Nathan Van Berlo
Nathan Foley
Sam Iles
Lenny Hayes
Craig Bird
Rohan Bail
Rohan Bewick
David Rodan
Farren Ray
Ben Johnson
Rucks
Sam Jacobs
Nathan Vardy
Tom Campbell
Forwards
Mark LeCras
Jeremy Howe
Tom Hawkins
Adam Schneider
Sam Reid
Jason Winderlich (C/F)
Kepler Bradely
Charlie Dixon
George Horlin-Smith
Andrew McQualter
Andrew Strijk
All players from the Leeches and the number 8 pick in the national draft are up for trade. Pm with offers.
Is that your whole team Nails? lol.
Quote from: MTTY on September 02, 2012, 02:01:22 PM
Quote from: picker_man on September 02, 2012, 01:49:27 PM
??? why cant the trades just go through at the same time..... i thought the whole point of on trading a player to another team was to keep your trades down
That is the point. As Torp says a threeway trade can be used here, so its as simply as getting all three parties to agree at the same time. ALL three parties must agree though. Apologies as i should have said that in my original reply.
ok no worries thanks :) could be tough getting hawka on here at same time haha, but both will agree we already have a 100% agreement. if not im not doing anytrades :P
Quote from: picker_man on September 02, 2012, 02:05:41 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 02, 2012, 02:01:22 PM
Quote from: picker_man on September 02, 2012, 01:49:27 PM
??? why cant the trades just go through at the same time..... i thought the whole point of on trading a player to another team was to keep your trades down
That is the point. As Torp says a threeway trade can be used here, so its as simply as getting all three parties to agree at the same time. ALL three parties must agree though. Apologies as i should have said that in my original reply.
ok no worries thanks :) could be tough getting hawka on here at same time haha, but both will agree we already have a 100% agreement. if not im not doing anytrades :P
No worries pickers.
All you need is to post it
e.g
THREE-WAY Trade
Hawka, Holzman and picker_man
picker_man receives: Hawka receives: Holzman receives: And then just get Holz and Hawka to post the same thing.
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,62863.0.html
Player list is here ^
Pm with any offers. :)
Quote from: Nails on September 02, 2012, 01:59:43 PM
| Defenders | | Jack Grimes | | Garrick Ibbotson | | Reece Conca | | Will Schofield | | Paul Stewart | | Ashley Smith | | Matthew Watson | | Tom Logan | | Andrejs Everitt | | Eric MacKenzie | | Richard Tambling | | David Astbury | | Michael Coad | | Patrick McCarthy |
|
| Midfielders | | Brad Ebert | | Mitch Wallis | | David Ellard | | Liam Anthony | | Rhys Palmer | | Brock McLean | | Jordie McKenzie | | Elliot Yeo | | Jordan Gysberts | | Brad Dalzeill |
|
| Ruckmen | | Matthew Leuenberger | | Billy Longer | | Ben Hudson |
|
| Forwards | | Danny Stanley | | Matthew Wright | | Jonathon Brown | | Tory Dickson | | Ricky Petterd | | Chris Knights | | Tyrone Vickery | | Jarrad Grant | | Liam Patrick | | Patrick Veszpremi | | Luke Power |
|
ALL Players are up for trade. Best to contact via: PM
Team thread: http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,65825.0.html
Also trading all draft picks...
INCLUDING the number 4 pick in the draft!
GET YOURSELF A GEM!
I cannot find my last 4-5 picks :S
Quote from: whatlez on September 02, 2012, 02:11:48 PM
I cannot find my last 4-5 picks :S
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,67322.0.html
Quote from: elephants on September 02, 2012, 01:27:33 PM
The Hebden Bridge Hedgehogs would like to inform the rest of the world that ALL of their players are up for negotiations. Obviously, some will be harder to capture than others but the coaching staff consisting of myself, Ric and Spite are willing to listen to all offers.
Here is our team: http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,63090.0.html
We are in the market for strong fwds and another solid midfielder.
get around Stanton boys
Quote from: Ricochet on September 02, 2012, 02:15:12 PM
Quote from: elephants on September 02, 2012, 01:27:33 PM
The Hebden Bridge Hedgehogs would like to inform the rest of the world that ALL of their players are up for negotiations. Obviously, some will be harder to capture than others but the coaching staff consisting of myself, Ric and Spite are willing to listen to all offers.
Here is our team: http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,63090.0.html
We are in the market for strong fwds and another solid midfielder.
get around Stanton boys
LOLOLOL
Pick 33 for Stanton?
Actually no, Pick 62 for Stanton?
Quote from: Nails on September 02, 2012, 02:21:32 PM
Pick 33 for Stanton?
Actually no, Pick 62 for Stanton?
:O Wow the Hedgehogs getting an amazing deal there
Quote from: whatlez on September 02, 2012, 02:16:07 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on September 02, 2012, 02:15:12 PM
Quote from: elephants on September 02, 2012, 01:27:33 PM
The Hebden Bridge Hedgehogs would like to inform the rest of the world that ALL of their players are up for negotiations. Obviously, some will be harder to capture than others but the coaching staff consisting of myself, Ric and Spite are willing to listen to all offers.
Here is our team: http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,63090.0.html
We are in the market for strong fwds and another solid midfielder.
get around Stanton boys
LOLOLOL
Yes, 14 tons in the first 15 weeks is hilarious.
Equally as funny is 4 scores over 189 including two 200+.
An average of 131 despite being 'shocking' in the second half of the season.
lol.
Quote from: BB67th on September 02, 2012, 02:22:26 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 02, 2012, 02:21:32 PM
Pick 33 for Stanton?
Actually no, Pick 62 for Stanton?
:O Wow the Hedgehogs getting an amazing deal there
Jesse White for Stanton sounds more reasonable?
Hahahaha you're all hacks. Look at his numbers ::)
Dayne Beams
Patrick Ryder
Luke Dahlhaus
Leigh Adams
Shannon Hurn
Tom Bellchambers
Ben Howlett
Stewart Crameri
Tomas Bugg
Jake Carlisle
Elliott Kavanagh
Daniel Menzel
Chris Mayne
Clay Smith
Richard Douglas
Chris Newman
Jude Bolton
Edward Curnow
Joel Corey
Jack Hombsch
Will Hoskin-Elliott
Ben Stratton
Jarryd Lyons
Zach Tuohy
Sam Dunnell
Brendan Lee
Alipate Carlile
Lin Jong
Luke Davis
Michael Ross
Ben Griffiths
Ariel Steinberg
Kyle Reimers
Nick O'brien
Nathan Blee
Tom Downie
Jimmy Webster
Alik Magin
Lachlan Dalgleish
All up for trade. Want premium mids.
i confirm the trades picker mentioned
i wont b trading much after this
Our trade still hawka?
i have one trade to work out, but open to offeres if anyone sees an opportunity to improve their list while also improving mine :)
Quote from: Hawka on September 02, 2012, 04:34:49 PM
i confirm the trades picker mentioned
i wont b trading much after this
cheers hawka.
so once holz confirms they've gone through MTTY or are ppl voting on them aswell
Hawka and I have traded.
Josh Caddy and my 2nd round pick for Savage and his 3rd Round pick.
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 02, 2012, 05:02:47 PM
Hawka and I have traded.
Josh Caddy and my 2nd round pick for Savage and his 3rd Round pick.
confirmed
Does trading a draft pick for another draft pick count as a list change?
^^ Don't think so
Quote from: BB67th on September 02, 2012, 06:26:07 PM
Does trading a draft pick for another draft pick count as a list change?
no
Heath Shaw + Luke Parker + Pick 20
for
Luke Shuey + Jeremy Howe + Pick 8
BB67th to confirm.
Quote from: elephants on September 02, 2012, 07:12:51 PM
Heath Shaw + Luke Parker + Pick 20
for
Luke Shuey + Jeremy Howe + Pick 8
BB67th to confirm.
Yep confirmed
Wow ele wins that one hardcore
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 02, 2012, 07:22:51 PM
Wow ele wins that one hardcore
Was going to say. He wins by a country mile.
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 02, 2012, 07:22:51 PM
Wow ele wins that one hardcore
Quote from: whatlez on September 02, 2012, 07:24:07 PM
Was going to say. He wins by a country mile.
Maybe, Heater is capable of 125+ though and Parker is like a younger Shuey.
Tbh I think that is way too one sided. Lol.
I was a bit reluctant for this one at first, but I need defense stability where I really drafted poorly I feel. Also I feel that Parker will be able to replace Shuey's scoring in the next year or two easily and also I don't really rate Howe's scoring ability too highly with Mitch Clark to come back into the Demons line up.
It's a win without the draft pick swap :P
depends how badly BB needed that elite defender.... the balance is often more than meets the eye, one must look at each list and see where the most gain from the trade is truly to be had :)
Quote from: BB67th on September 02, 2012, 07:26:34 PM
I was a bit reluctant for this one at first, but I need defense stability where I really drafted poorly I feel. Also I feel that Parker will be able to replace Shuey's scoring in the next year or two easily and also I don't really rate Howe's scoring ability too highly with Mitch Clark to come back into the Demons line up.
Yeah, short term I have it covered but long term with Parker you'll be fine.
Oh, by the way. Parker averages a SUB AFFECTED 91...
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 02, 2012, 07:28:50 PM
depends how badly BB needed that elite defender.... the balance is often more than meets the eye, one must look at each list and see where the most gain from the trade is truly to be had :)
Exactly, Shuey is an upgrade on Parker for me but I lose my best backmen... Lucky Howe will slot in a F2 or F3 next year for us.
*Sorry for the post-whoring...
Falcons get: J Selwood + National Draft picks 49 (Rnd3) and 60 (Rnd4)
Warewolves get: J Redden + National Draft picks 9 (Rnd1) and 28 (Rnd2)
Colli to confirm.
Some of these trades.........
Colli really does not like Selwood.
Considering he gave up Cotchin for Selwood ;)
I can see the upside in that one too.
Redden could match Selwood and 4 picks in the top two rounds will have Colli set!!
Wow ready through it again, Cw has had a flowering ripping deal. That is poor for Spink.
Even imo. Good trade boys!
I reckon Colli has a great deal there.
I confirm the pickers deal.
Just to make sure does this count as using 2 movements or 4?
Thats a good trade with collie and spinks colli gets a potential top 10 player and some draft picks whereas spinks gets a readymade top 10er
The Falcons are now chasing an early draft pick. Please PM any offers, team thread below:
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,62930.0.html
Quote from: elephants on September 02, 2012, 08:33:08 PM
Even imo. Good trade boys!
... it's not close to even :-X
Quote from: Boomz on September 02, 2012, 09:06:48 PM
Quote from: elephants on September 02, 2012, 08:33:08 PM
Even imo. Good trade boys!
... it's not close to even :-X
You serious? Selwood only averages 10 points a game more. Colli gets 4 picks in the top two rounds now!?
is there voting in this comp. Some of the trades look pretty one sided and there is one i would veto.
Quote from: Holzman on September 02, 2012, 09:17:15 PM
is there voting in this comp. Some of the trades look pretty one sided and there is one i would veto.
There is in worlds but i dont like it. If both coaches are happy then its fine. Its one persons team not everyone elses.
Quote from: Spinking on September 02, 2012, 08:15:24 PM
Falcons get: J Selwood + National Draft picks 49 (Rnd3) and 60 (Rnd4)
Warewolves get: J Redden + National Draft picks 9 (Rnd1) and 28 (Rnd2)
Colli to confirm.
This trade is confirmed.even i think, i pushed for MORE!
Quote from: elephants on September 02, 2012, 09:20:38 PM
Quote from: Holzman on September 02, 2012, 09:17:15 PM
is there voting in this comp. Some of the trades look pretty one sided and there is one i would veto.
There is in worlds but i dont like it. If both coaches are happy then its fine. Its one persons team not everyone elses.
i agree should let people do what they want but some trades are just soo teriblle something needs to happen.
Like in the euro the Selwood for Shiels trade. Hawka now really regrets that at it made his team really weak.
Most people are looking at that trade the same way. These players score more so they are better. But position is a huge factor.
Shuey is the 34th highest avg scoring mid. Heath Shaw is the 11th highest avg scoring back. In front of shaw is lids, scotland, carrazzo, gram and enright, all whom are turning 30 or more next season or not going to be a mid. Meaning from the younger players, shaw ranks 6th. Goddard may move so who knows how he will score.
Being a pies supporter, I can tell you that Shaw has not been good this season. I feel he has been playing out of position, a bit too high up the ground yet still holds around the 100 average for a backman who will always be a backman. That is super valuable.
Then there is Parker, he has been the Sub countless times and no one can say how good he will be, but we know he will be good. Could he reach the 110avg next season, why not, maybe more if sydney continue to improve. As BB said before, there are questions marks about howe with clarke in the team. We need a forward and he needs a backman.
I feel the difference in parker and shuey is much much smaller than in shaw and howe which is where the trade in draft picks come from.
It's not a case of 100 + 91 is worse than 125 + 90 and that's that. We need to play rivers in defence now, so we lost 30-35 points there. If BB plays Heater over a rookie in the backline, he could make up around 40 points and that difference might be less playing parker and the next in line after howe.
Yeah that is one trade I do recall being a shocker.
I still think that some coaches need to cop the repercussions of poor trading.
Ultimately up to MTTY though, I don't mind too much :)
Quote from: Spite on September 02, 2012, 09:39:11 PM
Most people are looking at that trade the same way. These players score more so they are better. But position is a huge factor.
Shuey is the 34th highest avg scoring mid. Heath Shaw is the 11th highest avg scoring back. In front of shaw is lids, scotland, carrazzo, gram and enright, all whom are turning 30 or more next season or not going to be a mid. Meaning from the younger players, shaw ranks 6th. Goddard may move so who knows how he will score.
Being a pies supporter, I can tell you that Shaw has not been good this season. I feel he has been playing out of position, a bit too high up the ground yet still holds around the 100 average for a backman who will always be a backman. That is super valuable.
Then there is Parker, he has been the Sub countless times and no one can say how good he will be, but we know he will be good. Could he reach the 110avg next season, why not, maybe more if sydney continue to improve. As BB said before, there are questions marks about howe with clarke in the team. We need a forward and he needs a backman.
I feel the difference in parker and shuey is much much smaller than in shaw and howe which is where the trade in draft picks come from.
It's not a case of 100 + 91 is worse than 125 + 90 and that's that. We need to play rivers in defence now, so we lost 30-35 points there. If BB plays Heater over a rookie in the backline, he could make up around 40 points and that difference might be less playing parker and the next in line after howe.
+1 there is more to trades than numbers but i agree with the guys comments on that worlds or euros trade whatever it was it was ridiculous.
in the Asians the vote was for admin approval. So 99% of trades will go through but that 1% of totally ridiculous trades can and will be blocked.
the rules here are that anything goes i think?
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,65768.0.html
If some of you may recall, the rules committee is also a trade panel. All trades are subject to voting from the panel.
Quote from: MTTY on September 02, 2012, 09:49:53 PM
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,65768.0.html
If some of you may recall, the rules committee is also a trade panel. All trades are subject to voting from the panel.
Thanks MTTY. I missed the rules thread :) that's good to know. So you guys will look over all the trades and just let us know what ISN'T approved or will you post to approve each individual trade?
Just wondering before I go and change my team list in my thread?
Quote from: elephants on September 02, 2012, 09:13:11 PM
Quote from: Boomz on September 02, 2012, 09:06:48 PM
Quote from: elephants on September 02, 2012, 08:33:08 PM
Even imo. Good trade boys!
... it's not close to even :-X
You serious? Selwood only averages 10 points a game more. Colli gets 4 picks in the top two rounds now!?
Was meaning it's uneven the other way :-X Colli wins big time.
Isn't the committee meant to be impartial? I see someone who may have got more involved than initially thought when the committee was created... ::)
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 02, 2012, 09:52:03 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 02, 2012, 09:49:53 PM
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,65768.0.html
If some of you may recall, the rules committee is also a trade panel. All trades are subject to voting from the panel.
Thanks MTTY. I missed the rules thread :) that's good to know. So you guys will look over all the trades and just let us know what ISN'T approved or will you post to approve each individual trade?
Just wondering before I go and change my team list in my thread?
Yeah we will look over every trade and say if it is fair or not. Then we will say why it is not in some cases and then possibly suggest changes.
Quote from: Boomz on September 02, 2012, 09:56:42 PM
Quote from: elephants on September 02, 2012, 09:13:11 PM
Quote from: Boomz on September 02, 2012, 09:06:48 PM
Quote from: elephants on September 02, 2012, 08:33:08 PM
Even imo. Good trade boys!
... it's not close to even :-X
You serious? Selwood only averages 10 points a game more. Colli gets 4 picks in the top two rounds now!?
Was meaning it's uneven the other way :-X Colli wins big time.
Ah, my bad :-[
Edit wrong thread
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 02, 2012, 10:16:13 PM
I wanted Whitey and Lewis so struggling this pick but I think il take Nathan Jones
Wrong thread mate :)
^^^ haha jb.
Hahah nice man :P
When do we find out if the trades or OK'd?
MTTY - Can you refresh us who is on the Rules Committee and who will approve trades.
Couple of Questions
Also when we have a trade arranged do you as the approving body need any extra infiormation as to why etc, eg I am trading Player x for Pick y in National Draft. Do we have to give you a rationale as to why i consider that player X is worth Pick Y to assist the Panel.
Do we post proposed trades in this thread and you post agreement or otherwise, Know similar question toCollie but just need to be sure of correct process.
Can someone direct me to where we have a draft order for the National Draft?
Here is my team...
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,62964.0.html
All players, including GAJ are up :P
Quote from: Fletch74 on September 03, 2012, 10:01:35 AM
Can someone direct me to where we have a draft order for the National Draft?
not sure if we do but it is reverse of the draft just completed and snakes, i think :)
Cheers CW ;)
Since Carrazzo might loose his DPP i am willing to trade him or any of my players to secure a sound defender.
Trade between the Breakers and the Magic.
Breakers Trade: Pick 3 Overall in the National draft
Magic trade: Josh Jenkins.
Waiting on Ringo to confirm.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 03, 2012, 08:45:04 PM
Trade between the Breakers and the Magic.
Breakers Trade: Pick 3 Overall in the National draft
Magic trade: Josh Jenkins.
Waiting on Ringo to confirm.
Is this serious? :o
It is serious and I confirm. Was going to use pick 3 to pick a ruck so thought I would take the opportunity to get a proven young ruck in exchange.
your getting robbed :o
i wouldnt be relying on Jenkins to play regular games for us.
not outrageous :) rucks take many years to come on so jenkins is a good upgrade from an 18 year old taken in the draft no matter how early, but the other team in the trade may need a mid gun, which can go BANG from day 1. Pick 3 in the draft gets them that.....
balanced i would say depending on each teams needs.
To put all into perspective was going to take Grundy at pick 3 if available which I think he would have been. Was to be back up to my Rucks of Nat and Jamar so not necessary to play all games. Rounds my Rucks nicely and worth the Pick 3 trade. Basically Jenkins v Grundy for Team Balance. Think It balances out.
The reason I'd say it's unbalanced is that you could have got a better ruck for pick 3 if you had shopped it around... Can't see Jenkins even playing consistently while Adelaide is at full strength.
but he's behind Jacobs who is only one year older and Jenkins will never loose the number one ruck he's to good, Also Jenkins doesnt fit into our forward line with the tall boys already there who help out in the ruck as it is. but yeah i wouldnt bloke the trade just dnt think jenkins will play much :)
Quote from: Boomz on September 03, 2012, 09:08:58 PM
The reason I'd say it's unbalanced is that you could have got a better ruck for pick 3 if you had shopped it around... Can't see Jenkins even playing consistently while Adelaide is at full strength.
The whole point of the team to discuss if trades are fair or not are judged on player V player( or players that can be gotten) and teams needs and structure. this trade helps both me and ringo's structure. Jenkins is averaging more than Cox did at his age. ::)
Quote from: Boomz on September 03, 2012, 09:08:58 PM
The reason I'd say it's unbalanced is that you could have got a better ruck for pick 3 if you had shopped it around... Can't see Jenkins even playing consistently while Adelaide is at full strength.
maybe hard to say most teams are leaning towards having 2 rucks on the park... who else have the crows got? thing holding jenkins back is tippett and walker and the fact they don't need him "resting" forward, but if tippett goes, what then i say??
still i don't suggest i am a crow expert so....
good point on cox at his age - i didn't know that. Still i think ONLY RIDICULOUS trades should be blocked by this committee, and i think this is a fair way off being ridiculous.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 03, 2012, 09:15:52 PM
Quote from: Boomz on September 03, 2012, 09:08:58 PM
The reason I'd say it's unbalanced is that you could have got a better ruck for pick 3 if you had shopped it around... Can't see Jenkins even playing consistently while Adelaide is at full strength.
maybe hard to say most teams are leaning towards having 2 rucks on the park... who else have the crows got? thing holding jenkins back is tippett and walker and the fact they don't need him "resting" forward, but if tippett goes, what then i say??
still i don't suggest i am a crow expert so....
good point on cox at his age - i didn't know that. Still i think ONLY RIDICULOUS trades should be blocked by this committee, and i think this is a fair way off being ridiculous.
Exactly. This is a structural trade for both teams and not ridiculously sided to one team.
Maybe right Boomz but when I looked at it from my perspective was sound Most Teams will have 2 rucks so that is 36 Rucks and Jenkins is ranked 27 in rucks. Offer was for Either Zac Smith (22) or Jenkins and I selected Jenkins.
Quote from: Ringo on September 03, 2012, 08:59:21 PM
It is serious and I confirm. Was going to use pick 3 to pick a ruck so thought I would take the opportunity to get a proven young ruck in exchange.
Could of offered you Hmac for pick 3
Quote from: Ringo on September 03, 2012, 09:11:49 AM
MTTY - Can you refresh us who is on the Rules Committee and who will approve trades.
Couple of Questions
Also when we have a trade arranged do you as the approving body need any extra infiormation as to why etc, eg I am trading Player x for Pick y in National Draft. Do we have to give you a rationale as to why i consider that player X is worth Pick Y to assist the Panel.
Do we post proposed trades in this thread and you post agreement or otherwise, Know similar question toCollie but just need to be sure of correct process.
We as a panel will vote and discuss. If your trade is reject we will allow you to challenge with reasons (like a tribunal)
I see this unfair and puts rings is a bad situation. No offense torp, but that trade is more one sided than the ele trade.
Plenty of trades going on
Cmon guys come at me with one of these trades please? :P
^ Same... I want a prem mid. Giving up all players cept cotchin and matera :)
All players available except JPK
Oh btw I have 5 list still :). I am still open ;)
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 03, 2012, 09:15:52 PM
Quote from: Boomz on September 03, 2012, 09:08:58 PM
The reason I'd say it's unbalanced is that you could have got a better ruck for pick 3 if you had shopped it around... Can't see Jenkins even playing consistently while Adelaide is at full strength.
maybe hard to say most teams are leaning towards having 2 rucks on the park... who else have the crows got? thing holding jenkins back is tippett and walker and the fact they don't need him "resting" forward, but if tippett goes, what then i say??
still i don't suggest i am a crow expert so....
good point on cox at his age - i didn't know that. Still i think ONLY RIDICULOUS trades should be blocked by this committee, and i think this is a fair way off being ridiculous.
I rate is as ridiculous Grundy is talked up to be the best ruck prospect in a long time. If he was available in the normal draft i would have taken him in my first 5 picks easy. Jenkins is a fringe forward.
Quote from: Holzman on September 03, 2012, 11:57:14 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 03, 2012, 09:15:52 PM
Quote from: Boomz on September 03, 2012, 09:08:58 PM
The reason I'd say it's unbalanced is that you could have got a better ruck for pick 3 if you had shopped it around... Can't see Jenkins even playing consistently while Adelaide is at full strength.
maybe hard to say most teams are leaning towards having 2 rucks on the park... who else have the crows got? thing holding jenkins back is tippett and walker and the fact they don't need him "resting" forward, but if tippett goes, what then i say??
still i don't suggest i am a crow expert so....
good point on cox at his age - i didn't know that. Still i think ONLY RIDICULOUS trades should be blocked by this committee, and i think this is a fair way off being ridiculous.
I rate is as ridiculous Grundy is talked up to be the best ruck prospect in a long time. If he was available in the normal draft i would have taken him in my first 5 picks easy. Jenkins is a fringe forward.
I do not see this fair and ringo needs to get Grundy or at least pick someone good with that pick... Jenkins cannot get in the side, fantasy is different then it was 10 years ago. I'm sorry Torp, but when I ward I thought t was third round pick for Jenkins and still thought the trade was unbalanced :X
Quote from: MTTY on September 03, 2012, 09:37:38 PM
Quote from: Ringo on September 03, 2012, 09:11:49 AM
MTTY - Can you refresh us who is on the Rules Committee and who will approve trades.
Couple of Questions
Also when we have a trade arranged do you as the approving body need any extra infiormation as to why etc, eg I am trading Player x for Pick y in National Draft. Do we have to give you a rationale as to why i consider that player X is worth Pick Y to assist the Panel.
Do we post proposed trades in this thread and you post agreement or otherwise, Know similar question toCollie but just need to be sure of correct process.
We as a panel will vote and discuss. If your trade is reject we will allow you to challenge with reasons (like a tribunal)
I strongly suggest all trades proposed be PM to MTTY for committee approval. Posting them here is just allowing other coaches to voice opinions and potentially influence the panels decision and serves no purpose whatsoever.
Plus there is no point posting trades here that may or may not even happen.just a thought.
^ +1
Jenkins should get more gametime when Tippett leaves though :)
Quote from: Scrads on September 04, 2012, 11:12:36 AM
Jenkins should get more gametime when Tippett leaves though :)
that's what I said but a better comparison to evaluate the pick is to look at Jenkins vs Longer.
Longer could have should have gone top 3 in the draft. Longer will be lucky to string together 10 games in his next 3 seasons at the lions while he develops. (with a fit hamburgler). Maybe Jenkins is on the fringe but who honestly expects any young ruck to be any teams walk up starter for the first 3 or more years of their career.
Jenkins could be a break out candidate without tippett in the team, they also lost gunston and haven't replaced him...
To me if Ringo was taking a ruck man with that pick 3, then he is may be no better off with Jenkins, but for years at least he sure isn't any worse off.
But here I go being a hypocrite influencing judges decisions with chitter chatter :)
JJ will be a jet, just wait and see ;)
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 04, 2012, 12:11:08 PM
Quote from: Scrads on September 04, 2012, 11:12:36 AM
Jenkins should get more gametime when Tippett leaves though :)
that's what I said but a better comparison to evaluate the pick is to look at Jenkins vs Longer.
Longer could have should have gone top 3 in the draft. Longer will be lucky to string together 10 games in his next 3 seasons at the lions while he develops. (with a fit hamburgler). Maybe Jenkins is on the fringe but who honestly expects any young ruck to be any teams walk up starter for the first 3 or more years of their career.
Jenkins could be a break out candidate without tippett in the team, they also lost gunston and haven't replaced him...
To me if Ringo was taking a ruck man with that pick 3, then he is may be no better off with Jenkins, but for years at least he sure isn't any worse off.
But here I go being a hypocrite influencing judges decisions with chitter chatter :)
Port Adelaide ;) Although Redden is a machine.
I will look at all the trades people have offered tomorrow night and will let you know. Sorry been to busy to look
Quote from: tbagrocks on September 04, 2012, 02:01:54 PM
JJ will be a jet, just wait and see ;)
hopefully he is for our teams sake but doubt it.
Tippett aint going anywere. prietty stupid to leave within the next 3 years, your just giving up a premiership, or 2, but prolly 3 :P
Quote from: picker_man on September 02, 2012, 01:11:01 PM
after working mine out im making 7 trades but only 5 list changes ;D
I'll start off im trading with Holz and Hawka ;D
Holz is getting - Boyd + Betts + my 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
I get off Holz - Christensen + his 1st,2nd,3rd nat draft picks
Hawka is getting - Shiels + Fasolo + Holz's 1st nat draft pick
Iget off Hawka - Ward + his 3rd nat draft pick + his 4th nat draft
that might be hard to understand sorry but im losing
BOYD + BETTS + SHIELS + FASOLO + 4TH NAT DRAFT PICK
and recieve
WARD + CHRISTENSEN + 2ND NAT DRAFT + 3RD NAT DRAFT + 3RD NAT DRAFT PICK
;D
,
accepted
Holz Recives: Lance Franklin, T.Mzungu
Torp Recieves: Andrew Swallow. E.Betts
:o Wow super trade Holz, you win big time, you are getting Buddy!
Quote from: BB67th on September 04, 2012, 05:53:46 PM
:o Wow super trade Holz, you win big time, you are getting Buddy!
im not sure about that swallow is turning into a machine, im alomst leaning towards we are losing the trade. But my forwardline is pretty risky so i need him for safety. Swallow is captain material
any trades been approved yet?
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 04, 2012, 06:07:37 PM
any trades been approved yet?
Waiting on one committee member to decide.
Quote from: MTTY on September 04, 2012, 06:10:23 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 04, 2012, 06:07:37 PM
any trades been approved yet?
Waiting on one committee member to decide.
Nice work, lots to go through i guess, i haven't checked the thread on how many exactly, but there seem to be plenty so far.
A trade between me and monstrum.
I Give: Taylor, Masten
Monstrum Gives: David Swallow, Mzungu
Waiting on Mons to confirm.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 04, 2012, 06:36:43 PM
A trade between me and monstrum.
I Give: Taylor, Masten
Monstrum Gives: David Swallow, Mzungu
Waiting on Mons to confirm.
I'm confused... so you are 3 way trading, and sending mzungu to holz? is that right?
Quote from: Spite on September 04, 2012, 06:48:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 04, 2012, 06:36:43 PM
A trade between me and monstrum.
I Give: Taylor, Masten
Monstrum Gives: David Swallow, Mzungu
Waiting on Mons to confirm.
I'm confused... so you are 3 way trading, and sending mzungu to holz? is that right?
no, this trade is completed when mons confirms. Then I trade with holz. not 3 way. Just need mons to confirm this before I confirm me+holz's.
Quote from: Spite on September 04, 2012, 06:48:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 04, 2012, 06:36:43 PM
A trade between me and monstrum.
I Give: Taylor, Masten
Monstrum Gives: David Swallow, Mzungu
Waiting on Mons to confirm.
I'm confused... so you are 3 way trading, and sending mzungu to holz? is that right?
yes.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 04, 2012, 07:02:15 PM
Quote from: Spite on September 04, 2012, 06:48:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 04, 2012, 06:36:43 PM
A trade between me and monstrum.
I Give: Taylor, Masten
Monstrum Gives: David Swallow, Mzungu
Waiting on Mons to confirm.
I'm confused... so you are 3 way trading, and sending mzungu to holz? is that right?
no, this trade is completed when mons confirms. Then I trade with holz. not 3 way. Just need mons to confirm this before I confirm me+holz's.
you realize not doing a three way trade uses up an extra list movement for you, as you trade a player in then out, you use 2 list movements.
unless you can get MTTY to count it as 1 :)
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 04, 2012, 07:09:20 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 04, 2012, 07:02:15 PM
Quote from: Spite on September 04, 2012, 06:48:42 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 04, 2012, 06:36:43 PM
A trade between me and monstrum.
I Give: Taylor, Masten
Monstrum Gives: David Swallow, Mzungu
Waiting on Mons to confirm.
I'm confused... so you are 3 way trading, and sending mzungu to holz? is that right?
no, this trade is completed when mons confirms. Then I trade with holz. not 3 way. Just need mons to confirm this before I confirm me+holz's.
you realize not doing a three way trade uses up an extra list movement for you, as you trade a player in then out, you use 2 list movements.
unless you can get MTTY to count it as 1 :)
IT'S NOT A 3 WAY TRADE. 2 seperate trades which is why I cannot confirm me and holz's trade until mons confirms me and mons trade.
i understand now.... my bad - half read the original post.
Quote from: monstrum on September 04, 2012, 11:38:57 AM
1st trade for the Liverpool Lobsters see's David Swallow and Tendai Mzungu moved to the Manchester Magic.. ::)
This trade is confirmed. I now confirm the trade with holzman.
trade that me and Torp agreed on.. ::)
Liverpool Lobsters OUT: David Swallow / Tendai Mzunugu
Manchester Magic OUT: Chris Masten / Harry Taylor
Mons loses the first to a delisting bye bye steve clifton.
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 05, 2012, 05:53:34 PM
Mons loses the first to a delisting bye bye steve clifton.
That is rough since he is was the first player at the club pretty much and only played 5 days ago... lol..
PM me offers for pick 4 in NAT draft.
I don't really know where to look, I went away for family stuff and all the good players are in trades. Who has quality players left? :(
Quote from: Nails on September 05, 2012, 06:25:30 PM
PM me offers for pick 4 in NAT draft.
I don't really know where to look, I went away for family stuff and all the good players are in trades. Who has quality players left? :(
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,62870.msg809785.html#msg809785
My team is here, have a look the following applies:
TRADED (Pending League Approval)
Joel Selwood.
NOT AVAILABLE FOR TRADEJarryd Roughead
Bryce Gibbs
Dayne Zorko
Majak Daw
The rest are open for trade.
WE ARE SEEKINGTop notch Ruckman
Elite Midfielder
Several High Quality mature Defenders
High draft picks
Why aren't you trading Daw? haha
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 05, 2012, 05:53:34 PM
Mons loses the first to a delisting bye bye steve clifton.
Spewin :( lol
Quote from: monstrum on September 05, 2012, 07:38:03 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 05, 2012, 05:53:34 PM
Mons loses the first to a delisting bye bye steve clifton.
Spewin :( lol
i wouldn't worry surely he will go in the rookie.preseason draft this bloke is a gun.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 05, 2012, 07:32:55 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 05, 2012, 06:25:30 PM
PM me offers for pick 4 in NAT draft.
I don't really know where to look, I went away for family stuff and all the good players are in trades. Who has quality players left? :(
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,62870.msg809785.html#msg809785
My team is here, have a look the following applies:
TRADED (Pending League Approval)
Joel Selwood.
NOT AVAILABLE FOR TRADE
Jarryd Roughead
Bryce Gibbs
Dayne Zorko
Majak Daw
The rest are open for trade.
WE ARE SEEKING
Top notch Ruckman
Elite Midfielder
Several High Quality mature Defenders
High draft picks
being a Lions man I do have Drummond and Patful as mature age defenders if interested. Interestingly Patful is the second favoured in Brisbane's B & F for Friday night. I did not take Patful till pick 592 in Round 33. Just pm if you like and check my team with Jenkins to be added to Rucks subject to approval. Very happy with Team.
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,62875.0.html
Quote from: Nails on September 02, 2012, 01:59:43 PM
| Defenders | | Jack Grimes | | Garrick Ibbotson | | Reece Conca | | Will Schofield | | Paul Stewart | | Ashley Smith | | Matthew Watson | | Tom Logan | | Andrejs Everitt | | Eric MacKenzie | | Richard Tambling | | David Astbury | | Michael Coad | | Patrick McCarthy |
|
| Midfielders | | Brad Ebert | | Mitch Wallis | | David Ellard | | Liam Anthony | | Rhys Palmer | | Brock McLean | | Jordie McKenzie | | Elliot Yeo | | Jordan Gysberts | | Brad Dalzeill |
|
| Ruckmen | | Matthew Leuenberger | | Billy Longer | | Ben Hudson |
|
| Forwards | | Danny Stanley | | Matthew Wright | | Jonathon Brown | | Tory Dickson | | Ricky Petterd | | Chris Knights | | Tyrone Vickery | | Jarrad Grant | | Liam Patrick | | Patrick Veszpremi | | Luke Power |
|
ALL Players are up for trade. Best to contact via: PM
Team thread: http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,65825.0.html
All available, including NAT Draft pick no.4, ~33 and whichever other picks we have
I want some jets... Forwards and Mids.
Please PM me :( I need to make trades.
All players, except GAJ, and Bennell are available for trades, plus draft picks #18, #19, #54,#55, etc
Really would like Rucks, and Forwards more so than others, but will trade others lines as well
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,62964.0.html
When is this last committee member going to come back to you on these trades MTTY, I can't do anything with anyone until I know what the outcome of the trade i have proposed is.......
yeah hows cw meant to pass redden onto me hmmmm ;D
Quote from: picker_man on September 06, 2012, 10:56:43 PM
yeah hows cw meant to pass redden onto me hmmmm ;D
what you got on your table there friend.... 8)
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 06, 2012, 10:57:36 PM
Quote from: picker_man on September 06, 2012, 10:56:43 PM
yeah hows cw meant to pass redden onto me hmmmm ;D
what you got on your table there friend.... 8)
i'll pm an offer shortly ;)
Can't comment on other thread, but Monstrum loses Addam Maric haha
Fletch loses Webberley.
richmond have like 9 spots to fill... :-\
The following trades have been assessed, with votes attached. If your trade has been rejected you have the right to appeal, please let me know asap if you want to.
1. Threeway trade
Holzman - Boyd + Betts + Picker_man's 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
picker_man - Christensen + Holzman's 2nd,3rd nat draft pick + Ward + Hawka's 3rd nat draft pick
Hawka - Shiels + Fasolo + Holzman's 1st nat draft pick
Decision - Accepted
2. Hawka + JBs-Hawks
Hawka - Josh Caddy and JB's 2nd round pick
JB's-Hawks - Savage and Hawka's third round pick
Decision - Accepted
3. Elephants + BB67th
BB67th gets - Heath Shaw + Luke Parker + Pick 20
for
Elephants - Luke Shuey + Jeremy Howe + Pick 8
Decision - Accepted
4. Spinking and Colliwobblers
Spinking gets: J Selwood + National Draft picks 49 (Rnd3) and 60 (Rnd4)
Colliwobblers gets: J Redden + National Draft picks 9 (Rnd1) and 28 (Rnd2)
Decision - Accepted
5. Ringo and Torpedo10
Ringo Trades: Pick 3 Overall in the National draft
Torpedo trades: Josh Jenkins.
Decision - Rejected
Awesome thanks MTTY, (and committee). That kinda rhymes, you see how I did that... :P
sounds like a boy band
Awesome welcome back to the brown and gold Shane :)
woooohoooo mine passed 8) and colli's aswell ;) ;D
MTTY, can you get a list of picks, or the picking order posted up for the National Draft (which shows traded picks).
don't need to list trades, just list each pick and who has it...
So that everyone can see who has which picks when. Now that we are trading picks it would be good to be able to see who has what picks including ourselves when looking at more trades.
Know it's a lot work, trust me :)
people PM'd me and said i was loosing out on my trade but looking at that i get the best two young players out of all 3 coaches and a stack of good drafts picks. I think i win ;D
Lol rejected ;D
Quote from: picker_man on September 07, 2012, 06:45:17 PM
people PM'd me and said i was loosing out on my trade but looking at that i get the best two young players out of all 3 coaches and a stack of good drafts picks. I think i win ;D
Like me planning for the future :) i think your trade works for everyone.
Quote from: MTTY on September 07, 2012, 05:25:53 PM
The following trades have been assessed, with votes attached. If your trade has been rejected you have the right to appeal, please let me know asap if you want to.
1. Threeway trade
Holzman - Boyd + Betts + Picker_man's 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
picker_man - Christensen + Holzman's 2nd,3rd nat draft pick + Ward + Hawka's 3rd nat draft pick
Hawka - Shiels + Fasolo + Holzman's 1st nat draft pick
Decision - Accepted
2. Hawka + JBs-Hawks
Hawka - Josh Caddy and JB's 2nd round pick
JB's-Hawks - Savage and Hawka's third round pick
Decision - Accepted
3. Elephants + BB67th
BB67th gets - Heath Shaw + Luke Parker + Pick 20
for
Elephants - Luke Shuey + Jeremy Howe + Pick 8
Decision - Accepted
4. Spinking and Colliwobblers
Spinking gets: J Selwood + National Draft picks 49 (Rnd3) and 60 (Rnd4)
Colliwobblers gets: J Redden + National Draft picks 9 (Rnd1) and 28 (Rnd2)
Decision - Accepted
5. Ringo and Torpedo10
Ringo Trades: Pick 3 Overall in the National draft
Torpedo trades: Josh Jenkins.
Decision - Rejected
Where are my trades with holzman and monstrum?????
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 07, 2012, 07:24:09 PM
Quote from: picker_man on September 07, 2012, 06:45:17 PM
people PM'd me and said i was loosing out on my trade but looking at that i get the best two young players out of all 3 coaches and a stack of good drafts picks. I think i win ;D
Like me planning for the future :) i think your trade works for everyone.
wasnt a 100% happy with my team but after the asians draft alot of my guys went early so now think i could be someone to rival you in 2-3 years for the premiership colli ;) you do have alot of young early draft picked players though :(
Quote from: whatlez on September 07, 2012, 07:06:15 PM
Lol rejected ;D
hahah. commensence prevalled never really though it was a chance of getting through, and im taking grundy 2nd pick just so you know ringo ;) ;D
Where are my trades with holzman and monstrum?????
[/quote]
there were no trades from you torp :o hahah you missed out m8 haha :P
Quote from: picker_man on September 07, 2012, 07:37:45 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 07, 2012, 07:24:09 PM
Quote from: picker_man on September 07, 2012, 06:45:17 PM
people PM'd me and said i was loosing out on my trade but looking at that i get the best two young players out of all 3 coaches and a stack of good drafts picks. I think i win ;D
Like me planning for the future :) i think your trade works for everyone.
wasnt a 100% happy with my team but after the asians draft alot of my guys went early so now think i could be someone to rival you in 2-3 years for the premiership colli ;) you do have alot of young early draft picked players though :(
Quote from: whatlez on September 07, 2012, 07:06:15 PM
Lol rejected ;D
hahah. commensence prevalled never really though it was a chance of getting through, and im taking grundy 2nd pick just so you know ringo ;) ;D
Me and Ringo have a backup plan.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 07, 2012, 07:39:12 PM
Quote from: picker_man on September 07, 2012, 07:37:45 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 07, 2012, 07:24:09 PM
Quote from: picker_man on September 07, 2012, 06:45:17 PM
people PM'd me and said i was loosing out on my trade but looking at that i get the best two young players out of all 3 coaches and a stack of good drafts picks. I think i win ;D
Like me planning for the future :) i think your trade works for everyone.
wasnt a 100% happy with my team but after the asians draft alot of my guys went early so now think i could be someone to rival you in 2-3 years for the premiership colli ;) you do have alot of young early draft picked players though :(
Quote from: whatlez on September 07, 2012, 07:06:15 PM
Lol rejected ;D
hahah. commensence prevalled never really though it was a chance of getting through, and im taking grundy 2nd pick just so you know ringo ;) ;D
Me and Ringo have a backup plan.
gonna laugh if its rejected also :P
did you appeal cause you can appeal there decision
Quote from: picker_man on September 07, 2012, 07:41:52 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 07, 2012, 07:39:12 PM
Quote from: picker_man on September 07, 2012, 07:37:45 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 07, 2012, 07:24:09 PM
Quote from: picker_man on September 07, 2012, 06:45:17 PM
people PM'd me and said i was loosing out on my trade but looking at that i get the best two young players out of all 3 coaches and a stack of good drafts picks. I think i win ;D
Like me planning for the future :) i think your trade works for everyone.
wasnt a 100% happy with my team but after the asians draft alot of my guys went early so now think i could be someone to rival you in 2-3 years for the premiership colli ;) you do have alot of young early draft picked players though :(
Quote from: whatlez on September 07, 2012, 07:06:15 PM
Lol rejected ;D
hahah. commensence prevalled never really though it was a chance of getting through, and im taking grundy 2nd pick just so you know ringo ;) ;D
Me and Ringo have a backup plan.
gonna laugh if its rejected also :P
did you appeal cause you can appeal there decision
Maybe.... :-\
or bring in a 3rd party with a slightly better ruck, Ringo gets the ruck, you get the draft pick and that 3rd party gets something they want?
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 07, 2012, 07:35:03 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 07, 2012, 05:25:53 PM
The following trades have been assessed, with votes attached. If your trade has been rejected you have the right to appeal, please let me know asap if you want to.
1. Threeway trade
Holzman - Boyd + Betts + Picker_man's 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
picker_man - Christensen + Holzman's 2nd,3rd nat draft pick + Ward + Hawka's 3rd nat draft pick
Hawka - Shiels + Fasolo + Holzman's 1st nat draft pick
Decision - Accepted
2. Hawka + JBs-Hawks
Hawka - Josh Caddy and JB's 2nd round pick
JB's-Hawks - Savage and Hawka's third round pick
Decision - Accepted
3. Elephants + BB67th
BB67th gets - Heath Shaw + Luke Parker + Pick 20
for
Elephants - Luke Shuey + Jeremy Howe + Pick 8
Decision - Accepted
4. Spinking and Colliwobblers
Spinking gets: J Selwood + National Draft picks 49 (Rnd3) and 60 (Rnd4)
Colliwobblers gets: J Redden + National Draft picks 9 (Rnd1) and 28 (Rnd2)
Decision - Accepted
5. Ringo and Torpedo10
Ringo Trades: Pick 3 Overall in the National draft
Torpedo trades: Josh Jenkins.
Decision - Rejected
Where are my trades with holzman and monstrum?????
Still waiting.....
They probably havent voted on them yet...
The Huddersfield Hawks and OxFord Owls have struck a deal
Oxford offer up Nick Dal Santo + 4th round to gain Matthew Broadbent from the Hawks + their 3rd round.
(Trade pending)
Confrim
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 07, 2012, 09:43:16 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 07, 2012, 07:35:03 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 07, 2012, 05:25:53 PM
The following trades have been assessed, with votes attached. If your trade has been rejected you have the right to appeal, please let me know asap if you want to.
1. Threeway trade
Holzman - Boyd + Betts + Picker_man's 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
picker_man - Christensen + Holzman's 2nd,3rd nat draft pick + Ward + Hawka's 3rd nat draft pick
Hawka - Shiels + Fasolo + Holzman's 1st nat draft pick
Decision - Accepted
2. Hawka + JBs-Hawks
Hawka - Josh Caddy and JB's 2nd round pick
JB's-Hawks - Savage and Hawka's third round pick
Decision - Accepted
3. Elephants + BB67th
BB67th gets - Heath Shaw + Luke Parker + Pick 20
for
Elephants - Luke Shuey + Jeremy Howe + Pick 8
Decision - Accepted
4. Spinking and Colliwobblers
Spinking gets: J Selwood + National Draft picks 49 (Rnd3) and 60 (Rnd4)
Colliwobblers gets: J Redden + National Draft picks 9 (Rnd1) and 28 (Rnd2)
Decision - Accepted
5. Ringo and Torpedo10
Ringo Trades: Pick 3 Overall in the National draft
Torpedo trades: Josh Jenkins.
Decision - Rejected
Where are my trades with holzman and monstrum?????
Still waiting.....
These trades were the ones submitted when we started voting. So we have not started on the others since they weren't submitted.
We accept decision and will be working on a more palatable trade.
Was I meant to vote? Can someone PM me about that please?
Quote from: Nails on September 08, 2012, 12:34:21 PM
Was I meant to vote? Can someone PM me about that please?
In this comp Nails there is a Rules committee who also decide on the fairness of trades unlike worlds where all coaches vote.
The following trades have been assessed, with votes attached. If your trade has been rejected you have the right to appeal, please let me know asap if you want to.
1. Threeway trade
Holzman - Boyd + Betts + Picker_man's 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
picker_man - Christensen + Holzman's 2nd,3rd nat draft pick + Ward + Hawka's 3rd nat draft pick
Hawka - Shiels + Fasolo + Holzman's 1st nat draft pick
Decision - Accepted
2. Hawka + JBs-Hawks
Hawka - Josh Caddy and JB's 2nd round pick
JB's-Hawks - Savage and Hawka's third round pick
Decision - Voided
3. Elephants + BB67th
BB67th gets - Heath Shaw + Luke Parker + Pick 20
for
Elephants - Luke Shuey + Jeremy Howe + Pick 8
Decision - Voided
4. Spinking and Colliwobblers
Spinking gets: J Selwood + National Draft picks 49 (Rnd3) and 60 (Rnd4)
Colliwobblers gets: J Redden + National Draft picks 9 (Rnd1) and 28 (Rnd2)
Decision - Accepted
5. Ringo and Torpedo10
Ringo Trades: Pick 3 Overall in the National draft
Torpedo trades: Josh Jenkins.
Decision - Rejected
Hawka and JB please note that your trade has been voided as Hawka had already traded his 3rd round pick in a threeway trade, i hadn't noticed that till now. Elephants and BB please note yours has been voided as well seeing as Ele does not have pick 20.
:(
Could everyone please post trades in this format
e.g. MTTY and .......
...... gives -
MTTY gives -
It makes it a lot easier. Plus list whether the pick is a rookie draft or national as otherwise i''ll assume you mean national.
Quote from: Ringo on September 08, 2012, 01:18:15 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 08, 2012, 12:34:21 PM
Was I meant to vote? Can someone PM me about that please?
In this comp Nails there is a Rules committee who also decide on the fairness of trades unlike worlds where all coaches vote.
Who is in the rules committee??
I am working on trades with Noz and Torp
Quote from: tabs on September 08, 2012, 03:51:06 PM
Quote from: Ringo on September 08, 2012, 01:18:15 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 08, 2012, 12:34:21 PM
Was I meant to vote? Can someone PM me about that please?
In this comp Nails there is a Rules committee who also decide on the fairness of trades unlike worlds where all coaches vote.
Who is in the rules committee??
I am working on trades with Noz and Torp
roo boys!, CrowsFan, boomz, Ziplock, Ossie and myself.
Quote from: MTTY on September 08, 2012, 03:57:31 PM
Quote from: tabs on September 08, 2012, 03:51:06 PM
Quote from: Ringo on September 08, 2012, 01:18:15 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 08, 2012, 12:34:21 PM
Was I meant to vote? Can someone PM me about that please?
In this comp Nails there is a Rules committee who also decide on the fairness of trades unlike worlds where all coaches vote.
Who is in the rules committee??
I am working on trades with Noz and Torp
roo boys!, CrowsFan, boomz, Ziplock, Ossie and myself.
Quality panel you have there :)
New trade with me & ringo.
RINGO Gives: Pick 3 In National Draft, Steven Motlop, Pick 70 In National Draft
FOR
TORP Gives: Taylor Adams, Jenkins.
I like it. Very even.
dont trades have to be one for one
Quote from: picker_man on September 08, 2012, 07:16:11 PM
dont trades have to be one for one
Yes so Torp has to throw in something.
Leave Torp to confirm but trade is as follows:
Trade between Ringo and Torp
Ringo gives Motlop Picks 3 & 39 to Torp
Torp gives Jenkins, Adams and Pick 72 to Ringo
Quote from: Ringo on September 08, 2012, 07:43:32 PM
Leave Torp to confirm but trade is as follows:
Trade between Ringo and Torp
Ringo gives Motlop Picks 3 & 39 to Torp
Torp gives Jenkins, Adams and Pick 72 to Ringo
Confirmed.
tabs and Spinking
tabs gives - Jetta, Smedts, Picks 16 and 21
Spinking gives - Hannebery, Derickx, Callinan, Pick 32
I want another trade! who has something I wants, who has my precious....
Quote from: tabs on September 08, 2012, 11:16:00 PM
tabs and Spinking
tabs gives - Jetta, Smedts, Picks 16 and 21
Spinking gives - Hannebery, Derickx, Callinan, Pick 32
Hey I wanted jetta why no reply to my pm? :(
Tabs gives Lewis Jetta, Billie Smedts, Picks 16 and 21
Spinking gives Hannebery, Derickx, Callinan, Pick 32
I still haven't even had any talk about trades since trades opened :(
Actually Noz has attempted, but we have failed lol.
Quote from: tabs on September 08, 2012, 11:16:00 PM
tabs and Spinking
tabs gives - Jetta, Smedts, Picks 16 and 21
Spinking gives - Hannebery, Derickx, Callinan, Pick 32
Whoops didn't see. Confirmed.
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 08, 2012, 11:55:25 PM
Quote from: tabs on September 08, 2012, 11:16:00 PM
tabs and Spinking
tabs gives - Jetta, Smedts, Picks 16 and 21
Spinking gives - Hannebery, Derickx, Callinan, Pick 32
Hey I wanted jetta why no reply to my pm? :(
sorry mate spinking PM'ed me weeks ago and i only went through them tonight
Trade between Nails and Torp
Nails gives NAT draft picks: 4, 33 and 40
Torp gives: David Swallow and his 2nd and 3rd round Pre-Season Draft Picks (not sure the pick numbers)
Quote from: Nails on September 09, 2012, 04:58:13 PM
Trade between Nails and Torp
Nails gives NAT draft picks: 4, 33 and 40
Torp gives: David Swallow and his 2nd and 3rd round Pre-Season Draft Picks (not sure the pick numbers)
Confirmed.
Any news on the trades?
6. Torpedo10 and Monstrum
Torpedo10 Gives: Harry Taylor, Chris Masten
Monstrum Gives: David Swallow, Mzungu
Verdict - Accepted
7. Holzman and Torpedo10
Holz Recives: Lance Franklin, T.Mzungu
Torp Recieves: Andrew Swallow, E.Betts
Verdict - Accepted
8. Noz and JB's-Hawks
Noz gives - Nick Dal Santo + 4th round
JB's Hawks give - 3rd round + Matthew Broadbent
Verdict - Rejected
Lol really now thats a joke 8)
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 08, 2012, 08:19:02 PM
Quote from: Ringo on September 08, 2012, 07:43:32 PM
Leave Torp to confirm but trade is as follows:
Trade between Ringo and Torp
Ringo gives Motlop Picks 3 & 39 to Torp
Torp gives Jenkins, Adams and Pick 72 to Ringo
Confirmed.
Any decision on this trade which has been lodged,
Quote from: Ringo on September 13, 2012, 12:33:33 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 08, 2012, 08:19:02 PM
Quote from: Ringo on September 08, 2012, 07:43:32 PM
Leave Torp to confirm but trade is as follows:
Trade between Ringo and Torp
Ringo gives Motlop Picks 3 & 39 to Torp
Torp gives Jenkins, Adams and Pick 72 to Ringo
Confirmed.
Any decision on this trade which has been lodged,
Not assessed yet Ringo. Will be in the next lot though. :)
How about putting some reasoning into why a perfectly legitimate trade doesn't pass...
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 13, 2012, 12:45:30 PM
How about putting some reasoning into why a perfectly legitimate trade doesn't pass...
You're welcome to appeal the decision JB.
How can I appeal when I dont know why is was rejected
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 13, 2012, 01:06:20 PM
How can I appeal when I dont know why is was rejected
When you appeal we will give you our reasoning plus the votes. Of you then choose to act on the appeal we will send you questions we require you to try and sway us by answering.
I appeal then
Quote from: Spinking on September 09, 2012, 12:10:03 AM
Quote from: tabs on September 08, 2012, 11:16:00 PM
tabs and Spinking
tabs gives - Jetta, Smedts, Picks 16 and 21
Spinking gives - Hannebery, Derickx, Callinan, Pick 32
Whoops didn't see. Confirmed.
what about this one??
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 13, 2012, 12:45:30 PM
How about putting some reasoning into why a perfectly legitimate trade doesn't pass...
there's been worse trades passed, actually think this one also a prietty fair trade so agree with JB 100%, wouldnt mind knowing why it got rejected as surprised it did.....
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 13, 2012, 11:55:14 AM
Lol really now thats a joke 8)
I would favour Noz in that trade but think it's acceptable.
I think noz is pushing for t more than jb.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 13, 2012, 05:35:19 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 13, 2012, 11:55:14 AM
Lol really now thats a joke 8)
I would favour Noz in that trade but think it's acceptable.
Im not sure who wins that trade. NDS is stil 28 and a great player, broadbent could be good but NDS will be better for the next 3 years.
Posting here and like no one knows about this on the forum:
Michael Coad and Andrew McQualter have been delisted.
But luck Nails and BB67th.
Damn. So just to clarify what extra pick do I get now he's been delisted?
I wanted to trade out Dal Santo as Broadbent has great promise. Anyways Dal Santo is still up for trade.
According to the Judges, Broadbent > Dal Santo ::)
Anyone.... I've tried to make a few offers, but all have been rejected. I must have a shower side :P
Offer me something
Quote from: Fletch74 on September 14, 2012, 11:35:06 AM
Anyone.... I've tried to make a few offers, but all have been rejected. I must have a shower side :P
Please feel free to make any offers Fletch. No promises reasonable happy with my team but will listen to any offers.
Only our Leadership Group is of limits (Adam Goodes, Nic Naitanui, Kieran Jack, Steele Sidebottom. Daniel Rich)
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,62875.0.html
I haven't even really had any trade discussions at since this trade period has opened :O
:(
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 14, 2012, 12:14:36 AM
According to the Judges, Broadbent > Dal Santo ::)
Actually it's the other way around JB.
Quote from: MTTY on September 14, 2012, 02:30:31 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 14, 2012, 12:14:36 AM
According to the Judges, Broadbent > Dal Santo ::)
Actually it's the other way around JB.
Then how is it unfair to me?
What about my trade with Torp ? :)
i want to get back in the trade market list of guys I'm willing to trade
Andrew Carrazzo
Travis Cloke
Nick Dal Santo
Ashton Hams
Kyal Horsely
Matthew Jaensch
James Kelly
Hamish McIntosh
Robert Murphy
Jaeger O'Mera
Kane Lucas
Gary Rohan
Adam Selwood
Jack Steven
Scott Thompson
Jarred Waite
Sharrod Wellingham
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 14, 2012, 03:27:10 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 14, 2012, 02:30:31 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 14, 2012, 12:14:36 AM
According to the Judges, Broadbent > Dal Santo ::)
Actually it's the other way around JB.
Then how is it unfair to me?
??? am i reading that right...... been rejected cause dal santo is to much of a lose compared to broadbent??
Quote from: Noz on September 14, 2012, 07:27:42 PM
i want to get back in the trade market list of guys I'm willing to trade
Andrew Carrazzo
Travis Cloke
Nick Dal Santo
Ashton Hams
Kyal Horsely
Matthew Jaensch
James Kelly
Hamish McIntosh
Robert Murphy
Jaeger O'Mera
Kane Lucas
Gary Rohan
Adam Selwood
Jack Steven
Scott Thompson
Jarred Waite
Sharrod Wellingham
I have varying levels of interest in these feel free to open discussions on what you may want from me in return for these, in particular interested in carrots o'mera , lucas ,
Quote from: Noz on September 13, 2012, 10:32:46 PM
I wanted to trade out Dal Santo as Broadbent has great promise. Anyways Dal Santo is still up for trade.
this is ridiculous why can't it be a good trade?
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 09, 2012, 05:09:26 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 09, 2012, 04:58:13 PM
Trade between Nails and Torp
Nails gives NAT draft picks: 4, 33 and 40
Torp gives: David Swallow and his 2nd and 3rd round Pre-Season Draft Picks (not sure the pick numbers)
Confirmed.
How's this trade going?
Hey guys latest trades being assessed are in the OP. Sorry for the recent lack of activity i have been extremely busy.
im confussed i thought id done 5 list changes, but next to my name it says 2 ???
can i please get an awnser to above question MTTY will help me with future trades thanks :)
Quote from: picker_man on September 19, 2012, 02:45:55 AM
can i please get an awnser to above question MTTY will help me with future trades thanks :)
As of now, from the passed trades, you have had two list changes (as stated by some of the others earlier in this thread, draft pick changes dont count.) :)
Hey MTTY i traded in betts and than trade him out. I thought that didnt count the second time. If not i would have traded westhoff instead?
Just need some clarification if im 3 or 4.
Quote from: Holzman on September 19, 2012, 08:53:17 PM
Hey MTTY i traded in betts and than trade him out. I thought that didnt count the second time. If not i would have traded westhoff instead?
Just need some clarification if im 3 or 4.
Whoops sorry Holz you are correct.
Keen to get a quality defender pm if your willing to trade one.
By the way guys the current trades that are being assessed will be revealed soon.
Plus a bit of a surprise to the comp coming up soon.......................................
Sounds good MTTY, I don't have any more trades, no one likes my list....
Surprise.....
Owls team
Defenders: Robert Murphy, Rhyce Shaw, Alex Johnson, Adam Selwood, Easton Wood, Stephen Wrigley, Cameron Delaney, Matthew Jaensch, Dustin Fletcher, Jed Bews, Tom Jonas, Tommy Walsh
Midfield: Nick Dal Santo, Andrew Carrazzo, Scott Thompson, Sharrod Wellingham, Jack Steven, James Kelly, Kyal Horsely, Callum Bartlett, Cameron Ellis-Yoleman, Jaeger O'Mera, Kane Lucas
Rucks: Jonathan Griffin, Hamish McIntosh, Myke Pyke
Forward: Travis Cloke, Jarred Waite, Taylor Walker, Ahmed Saad, Daniel Giansiracusa, Ashton Hams, Lewis Johnstone, Tim McIntyre, Terry Milera, Brett O'Hanlon, Jack Redpath, Gary Rohan
Actually i won't be after defenders but i would like some more midfielders so if you want to get rid of some mids ill take them.
^ Carrots ???
Trade 9 - Ringo and Torpedo10
RINGO Gives: Pick 3 In National Draft, Steven Motlop, Pick 39 In National Draft
FOR
TORP Gives: Taylor Adams, Jenkins, Pick 72 National draft
Assessment - Void - This is due to Torp already having 5 list changes
Trade 10 - tabs and Spinking
tabs gives - Jetta, Smedts, Picks 16 and 21
Spinking gives - Hannebery, Derickx, Callinan, Pick 32
Assessment - Rejected
Trade 11 - Nails and Torpedo10
Nails gives NAT draft picks: 4, 33 and 40
Torp gives: David Swallow and his 2nd and 3rd round Pre-Season Draft Pick
Assessment - Passed
It says on main page passed, but void here??
Come on, I really want Swallow :'(
To be honest I don't really think draft picks should count as "list changes"
As they aren't really a part of your list, have never played for your team and are yet to be players...
Still trying to work out list changes myself Nails. I am now listed as 2 Thought it would have been 1 as I traded Motlop and 2 picks for Adams and Jenkins and 1 pick. So I would say looks like draft picks if replaced by players are classified as list changes. Bit uneven when you are giving up one of your national Draft picks to gain a player. Rationale someone can swap 5 players for 5 players on the list and still retain all draft picks. Someone else swaps some players for draft picks counts as list changes and draft pick numbers are reduced.
i have decided NOT to count draft picks as list movements in Asians ( Where there is a list movement on each side of the trade).
Where it is a player for a draft pick - i count that as a list movement.
But MTTY runs things here and there is merit in both counting and not counting the draft picks as list movements, so I'll just agree with whatever the boss says.
Makes my trade 3 list movements instead of only 1, but no one else wants to trade with me anyway so no problem :)
I have no list changes :(
Wouldn't both Adams and Jenkins leaving torps list equal 6 players leaving his team so 6 list movements
Quote from: Noz on September 21, 2012, 02:37:41 PM
I have no list changes :(
Yes well we tried but walked away from the table when we realized neither one of us was stupid enough to give the other one a ripping deal ;D
we did try, a little :)
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Note: I will put this in the OP.
Then torp cant do his trade with ringo?
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 02:56:20 PM
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Note: I will put this in the OP.
Therefore (in my non-official opinion, and an opinion that respects your decision) I think that Ringo/Torp trade should be voided (sorry Ringo)
As that trade would take Torp to 6 list changes, and therefore because their trade does not pass, my trade with Torp should pass as it'll take him to 5 list changes as Ringo/Torp's trade should be voided under the rules.
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 03:00:36 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 02:56:20 PM
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Note: I will put this in the OP.
Therefore (in my non-official opinion, and an opinion that respects your decision) I think that Ringo/Torp trade should be voided (sorry Ringo)
As that trade would take Torp to 6 list changes, and therefore because their trade does not pass, my trade with Torp should pass as it'll take him to 5 list changes as Ringo/Torp's trade should be voided under the rules.
You are correct Nails. Apologies as i had Torp down as Betts not counting as a list movement for him too. (After Betts was on traded but it should still count for Torp).
Should not Ringo be given the opportunity to make his trade work wih one less list movement for torps?
Their trade was negotiated first of course I guess it will be up to Torps in the end.
Just flying the flag for Ringo :)
Can I get some clarification on why Tabs and my trade did not go through? I thought the rule is there to eliminate crazy trades. Tabs and I agreed more than 2 weeks ago on this, have been basing all future trades on this going through. I believe the rule should be in place to prevent Ablett for Relton Roberts type trades rather than slight inequalitys. This eliminates the opportunity for coaches to pull off clever trades or strong negotiations.
Quote from: Spinking on September 21, 2012, 03:54:29 PM
Can I get some clarification on why Tabs and my trade did not go through? I thought the rule is there to eliminate crazy trades. Tabs and I agreed more than 2 weeks ago on this, have been basing all future trades on this going through. I believe the rule should be in place to prevent Ablett for Relton Roberts type trades rather than slight inequalitys. This eliminates the opportunity for coaches to pull off clever trades or strong negotiations.
LOL I reckon you just answered your own question :o
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 03:05:50 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 03:00:36 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 02:56:20 PM
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Note: I will put this in the OP.
Therefore (in my non-official opinion, and an opinion that respects your decision) I think that Ringo/Torp trade should be voided (sorry Ringo)
As that trade would take Torp to 6 list changes, and therefore because their trade does not pass, my trade with Torp should pass as it'll take him to 5 list changes as Ringo/Torp's trade should be voided under the rules.
You are correct Nails. Apologies as i had Torp down as Betts not counting as a list movement for him too. (After Betts was on traded but it should still count for Torp).
I did the trade with Nails because I thought the trade with ringo would go through, neither trade should go through because of changed circumstances.
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 03:00:36 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 02:56:20 PM
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Note: I will put this in the OP.
Therefore (in my non-official opinion, and an opinion that respects your decision) I think that Ringo/Torp trade should be voided (sorry Ringo)
As that trade would take Torp to 6 list changes, and therefore because their trade does not pass, my trade with Torp should pass as it'll take him to 5 list changes as Ringo/Torp's trade should be voided under the rules.
No, I should be given an oppitunity to try and negotiate with ringo because it was confirmed first.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 04:09:48 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 03:00:36 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 02:56:20 PM
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Note: I will put this in the OP.
Therefore (in my non-official opinion, and an opinion that respects your decision) I think that Ringo/Torp trade should be voided (sorry Ringo)
As that trade would take Torp to 6 list changes, and therefore because their trade does not pass, my trade with Torp should pass as it'll take him to 5 list changes as Ringo/Torp's trade should be voided under the rules.
No, I should be given an oppitunity to try and negotiate with ringo because it was confirmed first.
It's your own fault for not paying attention to the rules and trying to trade more than you're allowed. You were aware of the rules ::)
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 04:03:24 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 03:05:50 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 03:00:36 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 02:56:20 PM
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Note: I will put this in the OP.
Therefore (in my non-official opinion, and an opinion that respects your decision) I think that Ringo/Torp trade should be voided (sorry Ringo)
As that trade would take Torp to 6 list changes, and therefore because their trade does not pass, my trade with Torp should pass as it'll take him to 5 list changes as Ringo/Torp's trade should be voided under the rules.
You are correct Nails. Apologies as i had Torp down as Betts not counting as a list movement for him too. (After Betts was on traded but it should still count for Torp).
I did the trade with Nails because I thought the trade with ringo would go through, neither trade should go through because of changed circumstances.
If you're doing trades because you're banking on another trade to pass, perhaps you should wait for that trade to be confirmed first as opposed to just assuming/hoping ::)
Quote from: Spinking on September 21, 2012, 03:54:29 PM
Can I get some clarification on why Tabs and my trade did not go through? I thought the rule is there to eliminate crazy trades. Tabs and I agreed more than 2 weeks ago on this, have been basing all future trades on this going through. I believe the rule should be in place to prevent Ablett for Relton Roberts type trades rather than slight inequalitys. This eliminates the opportunity for coaches to pull off clever trades or strong negotiations.
I agree this trade panel is absolute bullshower. The only blocked trades sshould be crazy trades not just because someone slightly wins the trade. People aren't going to trade if they think they are doing an even trade they always want to think they are ahead.
I am not trading until the trade committee is changed
A bit drastic? There is an appeals process isn't there, if the decision was close you may be able to convince the panel to over rule or they may just need a very minor change to the balance.
I am not commenting on the particular trade because it is none of my business but perhaps a PM to MTTY to appeal the trade would be a good first step?
I agree IN GENERAL that a trade does not have to be equal exactly but there are a lot of things to consider, as the trade that favors one team may favor them too much and MORE IMPORTANT, if it disadvantages a team too much, there is the risk that team will fail to perform, the coach quit and the team be left in a mess for the poor sucker if one can be found to take it over.
For example the committee needs to be careful to not allow a young list that won't compete early to worsen it's situation by trading out senior players for draft picks, making it even less likely to compete for years.
I am sure he doesn't wasn't a GCS or GWS in British...
On the flip side, a team like Nails in Asians that has drafted old players for an early premiership, must be monitored through trades that is isn't trading itself into a hopeless position in 2-3 seasons time by trading in MORE old players for that early premiership and trading OUT their draft picks.
This would mean the owner could take 2 premierships, by then everyone retires, then his list is shot to pieces, he has traded all early draft picks away, and quits because it will take 5-6 years to fix the team.
Again how to find some poor sucker to take the team over?
AGAIN THIS IS GENERAL COMMENT NOT ON THE SPECIFIC TRADE/S THAT HAVE CAUSED THIS COMMOTION :)
Just saying MTTY is responsible for making sure he has a league with competitive teams, NOW, in a few seasons, and beyond.
Well these trades have been fine there's been no teams stocking up on old or young so I'm over it tradings obviously not worth the time in British because you cant have any advantage at all. So whats the point of you can't get an advantage.
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 04:27:21 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 04:09:48 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 03:00:36 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 02:56:20 PM
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Note: I will put this in the OP.
Therefore (in my non-official opinion, and an opinion that respects your decision) I think that Ringo/Torp trade should be voided (sorry Ringo)
As that trade would take Torp to 6 list changes, and therefore because their trade does not pass, my trade with Torp should pass as it'll take him to 5 list changes as Ringo/Torp's trade should be voided under the rules.
No, I should be given an oppitunity to try and negotiate with ringo because it was confirmed first.
It's your own fault for not paying attention to the rules and trying to trade more than you're allowed. You were aware of the rules ::)
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 04:03:24 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 03:05:50 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 03:00:36 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 02:56:20 PM
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Note: I will put this in the OP.
Therefore (in my non-official opinion, and an opinion that respects your decision) I think that Ringo/Torp trade should be voided (sorry Ringo)
As that trade would take Torp to 6 list changes, and therefore because their trade does not pass, my trade with Torp should pass as it'll take him to 5 list changes as Ringo/Torp's trade should be voided under the rules.
You are correct Nails. Apologies as i had Torp down as Betts not counting as a list movement for him too. (After Betts was on traded but it should still count for Torp).
I did the trade with Nails because I thought the trade with ringo would go through, neither trade should go through because of changed circumstances.
If you're doing trades because you're banking on another trade to pass, perhaps you should wait for that trade to be confirmed first as opposed to just assuming/hoping ::)
I still have 1 out left.
6. Torpedo10 and Monstrum
Torpedo10 Gives:
Harry Taylor, Chris MastenMonstrum Gives: David Swallow, Mzungu
Verdict - Accepted
7. Holzman and Torpedo10
Holz Recives:
Lance Franklin, T.MzunguTorp Recieves: Andrew Swallow, E.Betts
Verdict - Accepted
Trade 11 - Nails and Torpedo10
Nails gives NAT draft picks: 4, 33 and 40
Torp gives: David Swallow and his 2nd and 3rd round Pre-Season Draft Pick
Assessment - Passed
4 Outs, 1 Out left.
Trade between Colli and me
Colliwobblers give: Redden + Henderson
Picker_man gives: Fyfe + Gunston
CW to confirm :)
Quote from: picker_man on September 21, 2012, 07:29:03 PM
Trade between Colli and me
Colliwobblers give: Redden + Henderson
Picker_man gives: Fyfe + Gunston
CW to confirm :)
confirmed
As always a balanced opinion from Colli, which I very much respect. I will contact MTTY as you suggest, but I want to point out some concerns that I have here. I am not overly worried about that specific trade however it has raised some concerns for me about this process.
1. That was a very long way from being a crazy trade. I have an old list and was trading some excess players for some youth I value, plus a reasonable pick. Tabs and I agreed this was beneficial for both our teams. I understand Colli's point about wanting to keep teams balanced, but trading the calibre of players we had involved was hardly team defining. I much prefer Holz system in the Euro where most trades go through unless there is a really crazy trade.
2. The length of time taken to confirm the trade is clearly prohibitive. I understand MTTY is busy, but 2 weeks to confirm a trade means that we effectively are stuck in a holding pattern until it is confirmed. In honesty I though the trade would just be ticked off on, so had started to negotiate my next trades.
3. I feel the rules committee owe a bit more explanation than just 'Rejected'
4. It may be in the interest of the admins to keep the teams fair, but lets not forget that it is a game :) I've really admired when some coaches pull off a skillful trade by playing hardball, talking their players up and playing to their opposition's interests. This is part of the game I enjoy most and the part I'd hate to see lost by the committee rejecting marginal trades.
No disrespect meant at all to MTTY or the committee who I think do a great job, but honestly I am now reluctant to go trying to organise a new trade knowing that it may get rejected in this manner.
Quote from: picker_man on September 21, 2012, 07:29:03 PM
Trade between Colli and me
Colliwobblers give: Redden + Henderson
Picker_man gives: Fyfe + Gunston
CW to confirm :)
Nope trade can't go through collie has a slight advantage.
Rejected
I agree with your concerns Spinking maybe MTTY can take the decisions upon himself and do away with the committee.
That is for him to decide however and he may have a process for dealing with trade decisions that are rejected, then challenged, maybe he then does take the final say on the trade and can over rule. or maybe he should / or shouldn't....
I agree trades should not be seen as having to be perfectly equal.
As we cannot predict the future of ANY player even a perfectly even trade may turn out to be a disaster for one side...
For this reason a certain amount of leeway, and speculation should be allowed in a trade, the what "could be" has to also be considered.
Take my trade with pickers just now...
For example gunston could be the next buddy or he could be delisted in a year.
Henderson, he has huge upside but possibly could become nothing, Pickers doesn't care he is just a balance for the trade...
For another example, redden may kick on and become the elite mid we all expect him to, Fyfe might do the same,
BUT if one of them does and the other doesn't then what looks a balanced trade, becomes a VERY UNBALANCED trade.
I don't mean to interfere just think it best to get a hold of MTTY and express your concerns to him, I am confident he will make the right call in the end :)
AND @ JBs-Hawks - I think you'll find BOTH pickers and I agree the advantage is his ! Fyfe under Lyons is a MASSIVE risk, will be the LEAST fantasy friendly team in the competition playing their ugly lock down football.
But if rejected we will build a case and take it to MTTY to try convince him to make the CORRECT decision :)
I have 1 Out left right? according to my above post I do.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 08:16:23 PM
I have 1 Out left right? according to my above post I do.
Torp you have not taken into account D.Swallow for a draft pick. So you have 5.
I agree IN GENERAL that a trade does not have to be equal exactly but there are a lot of things to consider, as the trade that favors one team may favor them too much and MORE IMPORTANT, if it disadvantages a team too much, there is the risk that team will fail to perform, the coach quit and the team be left in a mess for the poor sucker if one can be found to take it over.
This is spot on by Colli. The trade panel was formed to do this, i formed it of members who i believe have the knowledge to do so. I even allowed a member (along with myself) of British to be on the panel.
As Colli says if you have a problem with the decision then appeal it. We have six people giving their opinion and not just one, if the majority cant see the trade as fair then it is rejected, as simple as that.
If you have a problem with the panel or how trades are run, feel free to leave the comp. I dont put in my own time to run this comp just to have people saying its poor. There are plenty of viable members on FF who would be happy to takeover. :)
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 08:20:15 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 08:16:23 PM
I have 1 Out left right? according to my above post I do.
Torp you have not taken into account D.Swallow for a draft pick. So you have 5.
Neither Swallow or Mzungu should count because they were never originally in my team.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 08:30:17 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 08:20:15 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 08:16:23 PM
I have 1 Out left right? according to my above post I do.
Torp you have not taken into account D.Swallow for a draft pick. So you have 5.
Neither Swallow or Mzungu should count because they were never originally in my team.
Ah sorry Torp didnt see that., you are correct i'll just fix the OP now. :)
Quote from: MTTY on September 02, 2012, 12:10:57 PM
The Trade period will work as follows:
Trade Period 1
Starts: After the Official Draft is complete
Ends: At the start of the National Draft
Trades: You may have up to 5 list changes, meaning that after you have finished drafting in the official draft that you can only add or take five players/draft picks from your list. However if you get a player and then on trade that same player for another player it will still only count as 1 list change.
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Please post all trades here.
Note: For a trade to be confirmed both parties must post the trade here.
Trades passed
1. Threeway trade
Holzman - Boyd + Betts + Picker_man's 4th nat draft pick + Hawka's 4th nat draft pick
picker_man - Christensen + Holzman's 2nd,3rd nat draft pick + Ward + Hawka's 3rd nat draft pick
Hawka - Shiels + Fasolo + Holzman's 1st nat draft pick
Decision - Accepted
4. Spinking and Colliwobblers
Spinking gets: J Selwood + National Draft picks 49 (Rnd3) and 60 (Rnd4)
Colliwobblers gets: J Redden + National Draft picks 9 (Rnd1) and 28 (Rnd2)
Decision - Accepted
6. Torpedo10 and Monstrum
Torpedo10 Gives: Harry Taylor, Chris Masten
Monstrum Gives: David Swallow, Mzungu
Verdict - Accepted
7. Holzman and Torpedo10
Holz Recives: Lance Franklin, T.Mzungu
Torp Recieves: Andrew Swallow, E.Betts
Verdict - Accepted
Trade 11 - Nails and Torpedo10
Nails gives NAT draft picks: 4, 33 and 40
Torp gives: David Swallow and his 2nd and 3rd round Pre-Season Draft Pick
Assessment - Passed
Trades being assessed
Number of movements per person
BB67th -
Boomz -
Colliwobblers - 1
Elephants -
Fletch74 -
Hawka - 2
Holzman - 3
JBs-Hawks -
Monstrum - 2
MTTY -
Nails - 1
Noz -
picker_man - 2
Ringo -
Spinking - 1
Tabs -
Torpedo10 - 4
Whatlez -
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 08:31:38 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 08:30:17 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 08:20:15 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 08:16:23 PM
I have 1 Out left right? according to my above post I do.
Torp you have not taken into account D.Swallow for a draft pick. So you have 5.
Neither Swallow or Mzungu should count because they were never originally in my team.
Ah sorry Torp didnt see that., you are correct i'll just fix the OP now. :)
Thanks MTTY. :)
w00t Swallow :)
2 of the best young midfielders in the comp...
Swallow and Wallis in the grope lane midfield w00t.
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 09:32:13 PM
w00t Swallow :)
2 of the best young midfielders in the comp...
Swallow and Wallis in the grope lane midfield w00t.
As you said yourself Nails, Injury Prone. ;)
Okay lads, the hedgehogs will be open for business as of next weekend. Inquire on Friday night as thats when I'll be able to make most stuff happen :)
The Leeches have not yet made any trades and are looking to right now. A whole raft of quality players are up for grabs as well as pick 8 in the national draft.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 22, 2012, 12:53:40 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 09:32:13 PM
w00t Swallow :)
2 of the best young midfielders in the comp...
Swallow and Wallis in the grope lane midfield w00t.
As you said yourself Nails, Injury Prone. ;)
Your an idiot if thats why you traded him.
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on September 27, 2012, 07:01:13 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 22, 2012, 12:53:40 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 09:32:13 PM
w00t Swallow :)
2 of the best young midfielders in the comp...
Swallow and Wallis in the grope lane midfield w00t.
As you said yourself Nails, Injury Prone. ;)
Your an idiot if thats why you traded him.
It's not but still. :P
anyone want a trade??
Looking to acquire a young, gun mid...
Someone similar to.... Brad Ebert, Mitch Wallis or David Swallow...
PM me who you're willing to trade and what you want in return.
i have 2 list movements left if my recent trade goes through, if not i have 4, so i might dabble in some Friday night trade discussion myself...
I still have all 5.
problem is i need the one thing everyone else needs, mids, although i could probably use a defender and a fwd also, but mostly mids.
suppose i can always draft me some,...
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 27, 2012, 10:47:02 PM
problem is i need the one thing everyone else needs, mids, although i could probably use a defender and a fwd also, but mostly mids.
suppose i can always draft me some,...
Shaw is on the table Coll :)
Quote from: Ricochet on September 27, 2012, 10:47:59 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 27, 2012, 10:47:02 PM
problem is i need the one thing everyone else needs, mids, although i could probably use a defender and a fwd also, but mostly mids.
suppose i can always draft me some,...
Shaw is on the table Coll :)
I'm shaw he is.
Quote from: whatlez on September 27, 2012, 10:51:06 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on September 27, 2012, 10:47:59 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 27, 2012, 10:47:02 PM
problem is i need the one thing everyone else needs, mids, although i could probably use a defender and a fwd also, but mostly mids.
suppose i can always draft me some,...
Shaw is on the table Coll :)
I'm shaw he is.
terrible
Quote from: tabs on September 27, 2012, 09:58:58 PM
anyone want a trade??
Yes, let me know what you're interested in from my side. I've tried contacting about 10 sides with no one interested in my players, even GAJ ;)
Quote from: Fletch74 on September 28, 2012, 11:51:14 AM
Quote from: tabs on September 27, 2012, 09:58:58 PM
anyone want a trade??
Yes, let me know what you're interested in from my side. I've tried contacting about 10 sides with no one interested in my players, even GAJ ;)
Please feel free to PM me with any trade offers as well.
I trade: Betts, Jenkins, Nat pick 33, Nat pick 36, Nat pick 40.
Ringo trades: Motlop, Nat pick 3, Nat pick 70, Sam Reid(GWS), J. Wilkinson.
Thought we had established that you had already done 5 list changes?
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 08:37:30 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 08:31:38 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 08:30:17 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 08:20:15 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 21, 2012, 08:16:23 PM
I have 1 Out left right? according to my above post I do.
Torp you have not taken into account D.Swallow for a draft pick. So you have 5.
Neither Swallow or Mzungu should count because they were never originally in my team.
Ah sorry Torp didnt see that., you are correct i'll just fix the OP now. :)
Thanks MTTY. :)
haha you get killed this time torp :P
but yeah i thought you had made 4 list changes before this, making this trade like 7 :o correct me if im wrong cause im for all trades going through :)
any update on current pending trades MTTY ?
^^^ yeah a week or two or more between trades being confirmed is rediculouse ::)
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 28, 2012, 05:57:19 PM
I trade: Betts, Jenkins, Nat pick 33, Nat pick 36, Nat pick 40.
Ringo trades: Motlop, Nat pick 3, Nat pick 70, Sam Reid(GWS), J. Wilkinson.
Been away for 3 days so confirm the trade. Main interest in Jenkins as a back up ruck. Other trades and picks to balance, Leave it to MTTY to decide on legalities.
Lob me offers via PM :)
Quote from: Ringo on September 30, 2012, 02:17:08 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 28, 2012, 05:57:19 PM
I trade: Betts, Jenkins, Nat pick 33, Nat pick 36, Nat pick 40.
Ringo trades: Motlop, Nat pick 3, Nat pick 70, Sam Reid(GWS), J. Wilkinson.
Been away for 3 days so confirm the trade. Main interest in Jenkins as a back up ruck. Other trades and picks to balance, Leave it to MTTY to decide on legalities.
Lol, 3 XVs teams can get confusing at times....
I was like WTF HOW DARE TORP TRY AND TRADE JENKINS HE'S IN MY TEAM, NOT TORP'S >:(
Quote from: Nails on September 30, 2012, 03:12:01 PM
Quote from: Ringo on September 30, 2012, 02:17:08 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 28, 2012, 05:57:19 PM
I trade: Betts, Jenkins, Nat pick 33, Nat pick 36, Nat pick 40.
Ringo trades: Motlop, Nat pick 3, Nat pick 70, Sam Reid(GWS), J. Wilkinson.
Been away for 3 days so confirm the trade. Main interest in Jenkins as a back up ruck. Other trades and picks to balance, Leave it to MTTY to decide on legalities.
Lol, 3 XVs teams can get confusing at times....
I was like WTF HOW DARE TORP TRY AND TRADE JENKINS HE'S IN MY TEAM, NOT TORP'S >:(
LOL
Someone trade with me :P
How many selections did we all make in the draft?
A handful
So....
Big news!!
Lobsters give:
Pendles - Rosa - Taylor - Masten - Pick #20
Hoods give:
Heppell - H. Bennell - Pearce - Pick #54 - Pick #55
.... Discuss... :)
Quote from: elephants on September 30, 2012, 08:25:51 PM
Someone trade with me :P
too much effort, no you trade with me ! ;D
Quote from: monstrum on October 04, 2012, 08:17:57 PM
Big news!!
Lobsters give:
Pendles - Rosa - Taylor - Masten - Pick #20
Hoods give:
Heppell - H. Bennell - Pearce - Pick #54 - Pick #55
.... Discuss... :)
The Hoods be robin you ;D see what I did there? ;)
Not a bad trade. But I can just imagine the UPROAR if this went up in the AXV a few days ago :o
Will be interesting to see how the committee (MIA) makes of it. You get 3 good starters, but you certainly PAY for them :)
and as I say in the Asians, that's just an opinion and the only two opinions that matter and the two people trading...
and the committee :) here...
Decent trade. What do you want to us to say?
Do you realise heppell and bennell will both become pure mids in a year or two ::)
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 04, 2012, 08:35:17 PM
Do you realise heppell and bennell will both become pure mids in a year or two ::)
True, and sounds like you think robin is a hood too or is it hood is a robber... ;D
but they will both be elite mids you would think.... so just need Pearce to keep it up, think he is still under rated..
Quote from: monstrum on October 04, 2012, 08:17:57 PM
Big news!!
Lobsters give:
Pendles - Rosa - Taylor - Masten - Pick #20
Hoods give:
Heppell - H. Bennell - Pearce - Pick #54 - Pick #55
.... Discuss... :)
Confirmed :D
Quote from: whatlez on October 04, 2012, 08:33:40 PM
Decent trade. What do you want to us to say?
I was reluctant. It took about 20 PM's or so to come to an agreement.
I have Pendles and GAJ in the mids now. Pick #1 and Pick #2 in the draft :D
The potential of the other two was my main concern
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 04, 2012, 08:35:17 PM
Do you realise heppell and bennell will both become pure mids in a year or two ::)
Bennell yeh but Heppell i dont think u can say he will deff be pure mid
Quote from: monstrum on October 04, 2012, 08:46:49 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 04, 2012, 08:35:17 PM
Do you realise heppell and bennell will both become pure mids in a year or two ::)
Bennell yeh but Heppell i dont think u can say he will deff be pure mid
I reckon he'll be similar to Goddard
Hopefully that'd b nice ;)
Good luck to everyone against the hoods midfield next yr ::)
Just about outscore my whole team :o
Quote from: Fletch74 on October 04, 2012, 08:44:08 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 04, 2012, 08:33:40 PM
Decent trade. What do you want to us to say?
I was reluctant. It took about 20 PM's or so to come to an agreement.
I have Pendles and GAJ in the mids now. Pick #1 and Pick #2 in the draft :D
The potential of the other two was my main concern
You got to get through committee first :)
Whilst it might look heavily in my favour now, Monstrum picks up two future guns who both could be the potential of GAJ and Pendles, so I hope the committee looks at that sort of thing as well as the immediate result...
Quote from: Fletch74 on October 04, 2012, 09:11:17 PM
Whilst it might look heavily in my favour now, Monstrum picks up two future guns who both could be the potential of GAJ and Pendles, so I hope the committee looks at that sort of thing as well as the immediate result...
You got a good deal but there is nothing wrong with the trade in the order of being blocked.
Apart from Pendles I like his players (he gets) better, the picks maybe weren't necessary ;) not #21 for #55 anyway :o .
The committee should pass it....... eventually trades are personal unless it is stupidly unfairly uneven most should go through
again just one opinion
Quote from: Fletch74 on October 04, 2012, 09:11:17 PM
Whilst it might look heavily in my favour now, Monstrum picks up two future guns who both could be the potential of GAJ and Pendles, so I hope the committee looks at that sort of thing as well as the immediate result...
They don't :P
I need to trade in a couple of gun midfielders anyone got a spare?
at this stage i wont be trading in this trade period
well then my friend you are of no use to me :P
ah well then.
All trade attempts have faded and not worked out
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 05, 2012, 12:12:26 AM
I need to trade in a couple of gun midfielders anyone got a spare?
One of Gibson, Moloney, DeBoer, Danyle Perace may be available for right price.
Quote from: tabs on October 05, 2012, 03:42:44 AM
ah well then.
All trade attempts have faded and not worked out
i know what you mean, very hard work, i have made two and both were proposed to me, so easy... still waiting on one MTTY >:( ;D ;D
Trade between The Swansea Breakers and The Winchester Werewolves.
Swansea Breakers Give: Sam Gibson + National Draft Pick * Ringo's 2nd Round Pick I THINK # 34
Winchester Werewolves Give: Josh J Kennedy + Aaron Cornelius
Ringo To Confirm.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 05, 2012, 05:30:17 PM
Trade between The Swansea Breakers and The Winchester Werewolves.
Swansea Breakers Give: Sam Gibson + National Draft Pick * Ringo's 2nd Round Pick I THINK # 34
Winchester Werewolves Give: Josh J Kennedy + Aaron Cornelius
Ringo To Confirm.
Confirmed Need forwards and this trade allows for this
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 05, 2012, 10:03:27 AM
Quote from: tabs on October 05, 2012, 03:42:44 AM
ah well then.
All trade attempts have faded and not worked out
i know what you mean, very hard work, i have made two and both were proposed to me, so easy... still waiting on one MTTY >:( ;D ;D
much easier in Asia as Jayman does all the leg work
Any update on latest trades being reviewed?
Quote from: Torpedo10 on October 05, 2012, 09:47:20 PM
Any update on latest trades being reviewed?
Dnt be stupid :o
maybe pm the committee members and or mtty and find out where it is all at has been a long time but we should complain in private :) as in by PM :) yes me too
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 05, 2012, 10:22:14 PM
maybe pm the committee members and or mtty and find out where it is all at has been a long time but we should complain in private :) as in by PM :) yes me too
Had thought that. Dont know who they are. Plus only been a few hours ;)
Quote from: monstrum on October 05, 2012, 11:09:49 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 05, 2012, 10:22:14 PM
maybe pm the committee members and or mtty and find out where it is all at has been a long time but we should complain in private :) as in by PM :) yes me too
Had thought that. Dont know who they are. Plus only been a few hours ;)
been a few weeks wait on others however, the natives grow restless...
Headhunters dnt stand for that shower!
No weight round here though... YET!!!
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 06, 2012, 12:01:30 AM
Quote from: monstrum on October 05, 2012, 11:09:49 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 05, 2012, 10:22:14 PM
maybe pm the committee members and or mtty and find out where it is all at has been a long time but we should complain in private :) as in by PM :) yes me too
Had thought that. Dont know who they are. Plus only been a few hours ;)
been a few weeks wait on others however, the natives grow restless...
Here are the committee members
MTTY; ossie85; CrowsFan; roo boys; Ziplock; Boomz
Most of the others are on the forum regularly so maybe they should be also pushing the issue. We have not had an update for 3 weeks and whilst trading is just adjustments to lists it is still not good enough.
On another matter what are the rules for picks for players retiring as I can not find any and I now have 2 in Drummond and Swift.
I believe the compensation comes in the form of picks at the end of our rookie/preseason draft...
Drummond should be better compensation but I think that is the rules.
I will try find time to put the list of trades since the last approval has gone through together and I will PM the list to MTTY and all committee members.
If MTTY is too busy then the committee members might have his approval to rule on the trades.
wewill see.
Hi Mtty, and committee, I have put this list together of all the BXVs trades proposed and waiting rulings, to help you get decisions ruled on. Has been a while I have advised fellow coaches MTTY is very busy but you probably need to get something done soon, people cannot make further trades of plan for the draft without knowing what is happening with existing trade proposals.
TRADES FROM MOST RECENT TO OLDEST:
Quote from: Ringo on October 05, 2012, 06:08:16 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 05, 2012, 05:30:17 PM
Trade between The Swansea Breakers and The Winchester Werewolves.
Swansea Breakers Give: Sam Gibson + National Draft Pick * Ringo's 2nd Round Pick I THINK # 34
Winchester Werewolves Give: Josh J Kennedy + Aaron Cornelius
Ringo To Confirm.
Confirmed Need forwards and this trade allows for this
Quote from: Fletch74 on October 04, 2012, 08:42:05 PM
Quote from: monstrum on October 04, 2012, 08:17:57 PM
Big news!!
Lobsters give:
Pendles - Rosa - Taylor - Masten - Pick #20
Hoods give:
Heppell - H. Bennell - Pearce - Pick #54 - Pick #55
.... Discuss... :)
Confirmed :D
Quote from: Ringo on September 30, 2012, 02:17:08 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 28, 2012, 05:57:19 PM
I trade: Betts, Jenkins, Nat pick 33, Nat pick 36, Nat pick 40.
Ringo trades: Motlop, Nat pick 3, Nat pick 70, Sam Reid(GWS), J. Wilkinson.
Been away for 3 days so confirm the trade. Main interest in Jenkins as a back up ruck. Other trades and picks to balance, Leave it to MTTY to decide on legalities.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on September 21, 2012, 07:30:11 PM
Quote from: picker_man on September 21, 2012, 07:29:03 PM
Trade between Colli and me
Colliwobblers give: Redden + Henderson
Picker_man gives: Fyfe + Gunston
CW to confirm :)
confirmed
I think this is all that is pending, will tell the guys to PM anything I have missed to you all as well :)
Not sure if I missed any if i did PM it to the committee and MTTY, this is all I could see going back to when MTTY was last on.
Another one of mine to add
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 28, 2012, 04:57:19 PM
I trade: Betts, Jenkins, Nat pick 33, Nat pick 36, Nat pick 40.
Ringo trades: Motlop, Nat pick 3, Nat pick 70, Sam Reid(GWS), J. Wilkinson.
Confirmed Been away for 3 days so confirm the trade. Main interest in Jenkins as a back up ruck. Other trades and picks to balance, Leave it to MTTY to decide on legalities.
MTTY was last online: October 03, 2012, 10:20:31 PM
Did he tell anybody he was leaving?
Quote from: Torpedo10 on October 06, 2012, 12:11:59 PM
MTTY was last online: October 03, 2012, 10:20:31 PM
Did he tell anybody he was leaving?
Don't think so??
Someone make me an offer. Looking for young backs and fwds!!
Quote from: elephants on October 06, 2012, 01:53:43 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on October 06, 2012, 12:11:59 PM
MTTY was last online: October 03, 2012, 10:20:31 PM
Did he tell anybody he was leaving?
Don't think so??
Someone make me an offer. Looking for young backs and fwds!!
Check his profile before you make that statement.
Last Active: October 03, 2012, 10:20:31 PM
from his profile.
committee members have got all the trades and given an indication of the results, will need to wait for one of them or MTTY to announce results, but they have decided by majority. Can't be long now till they or MTTY can announce :)
Quote from: Torpedo10 on October 06, 2012, 01:57:40 PM
Quote from: elephants on October 06, 2012, 01:53:43 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on October 06, 2012, 12:11:59 PM
MTTY was last online: October 03, 2012, 10:20:31 PM
Did he tell anybody he was leaving?
Don't think so??
Someone make me an offer. Looking for young backs and fwds!!
Check his profile before you make that statement.
Last Active: October 03, 2012, 10:20:31 PM
from his profile.
Ummmm what?
wtf u guys smokin...
Date Registered: 01 September 2010, 20:52:47
Local Time:06 October 2012, 18:55:52
Last Active: Today at 14:45:39
even though thats after ur quotes yesterday he was on at 9pm coz i checked yesterday as well :P
interesting :-\
Got another trade to add to the list...
The mighty Liverpool Lobsters give:
Michael Walters + Nat Pick 53
Staines Steins give:
Claye Beams + Nat Pick 21
Tabs to confirm :)
Quote from: monstrum on October 10, 2012, 01:37:35 AM
Got another trade to add to the list...
The mighty Liverpool Lobsters give:
Michael Walters + Nat Pick 53
Staines Steins give:
Claye Beams + Nat Pick 21
Tabs to confirm :)
confirm
I thought we were only able to do 5 list movements?
If so, you aren't able to do that trade Monstrum as you did 5 list movements with me ???
Yeh do draft picks are considered trades in this comp :-\
I didnt know that, i dont suppose we can change that rule... ::)
Big trade reached between the Leeches and Owls
Oxford Owls give: Andrew Carrazzo, Alex Johnson, Jarrad Waite
For
Leeds Leechers give: Greg Broughtan, Josh Tynan and NAT pick 29
Noz to confirm trade
Quote from: BB67th on October 10, 2012, 06:42:12 PM
Big trade reached between the Leeches and Owls
Oxford Owls give: Andrew Carrazzo, Alex Johnson, Jarrad Waite
For
Leeds Leechers give: Greg Broughtan, Josh Tynan and NAT pick 29
Noz to confirm trade
Confirmed
Reason: Needed some more defenders with Carrazzo loosing his DPP plus another pick inside the top 30 is handy
Quote from: monstrum on October 10, 2012, 02:31:58 PM
Yeh do draft picks are considered trades in this comp :-\
I didnt know that, i dont suppose we can change that rule... ::)
almost 100% sure MTTY has already confirmed earlier in htis thread, draft picks for draft picks trades do NOT count as list movements.
Same as IN Asians.
player - player = YES
player - pick = YES
pick - player = YES
pick - pick = NO
certain of it, could go back and find his post but i can't be bothered :)
I hope ur right colli!!
Fletch dug this up from the rules i think
Quote from: Fletch74 on October 10, 2012, 02:12:54 PM
It's in the rules...
Trades: You may have up to 5 list changes, meaning that after you have finished drafting in the official draft that you can only add or take five players/draft picks from your list. However if you get a player and then on trade that same player for another player it will still only count as 1 list change.
OK so I had to go find his post :) pretty clear here. but best check with MTTY if any doubts he is the boss :)
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 03:05:50 PM
Quote from: Nails on September 21, 2012, 03:00:36 PM
Quote from: MTTY on September 21, 2012, 02:56:20 PM
1. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Player y
2. A list change will occur for both teams if this happens: Player x for Draft pick
3. A list change will not count if: Draft pick x for Draft pick y
Note: I will put this in the OP.
Therefore (in my non-official opinion, and an opinion that respects your decision) I think that Ringo/Torp trade should be voided (sorry Ringo)
As that trade would take Torp to 6 list changes, and therefore because their trade does not pass, my trade with Torp should pass as it'll take him to 5 list changes as Ringo/Torp's trade should be voided under the rules.
You are correct Nails. Apologies as i had Torp down as Betts not counting as a list movement for him too. (After Betts was on traded but it should still count for Torp).
Ok after reading that and checking my trades theyre all good!! Thnx colli :)
Quote from: Ringo on September 30, 2012, 02:17:08 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on September 28, 2012, 05:57:19 PM
I trade: Betts, Jenkins, Nat pick 33, Nat pick 36, Nat pick 40.
Ringo trades: Motlop, Nat pick 3, Nat pick 70, Sam Reid(GWS), J. Wilkinson.
Been away for 3 days so confirm the trade. Main interest in Jenkins as a back up ruck. Other trades and picks to balance, Leave it to MTTY to decide on legalities.
Bump
Want some quality youth? We have it here!
I'm looking to trade so enquire within :)
This is starting to get silly, trades haven't been checked in ages. ::)
Quote from: Torpedo10 on October 11, 2012, 08:17:36 PM
This is starting to get silly, trades haven't been checked in ages. ::)
if you look back to my post which summarized the trades outstanding, the committee all rules on these trades in the affirmative, but obviously ( understandably) none in the committee were willing to post an official passing of the trades in MTTYs absence.
ANd it certainly isn't my place to do so, but I can tell you those that were listed in my post, including both of Ringo's were agreed to by more members of the committee than were left to vote against, meaning they all will pass.
So you can assume very reliably that those trades at least will pass but obviously it won't be official until MTTY makes it so.
Here is a link to the ones I got answers back in the affirmative from the majority of committee members ( majority including MTTY)
Link: http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,67577.msg904252.html#msg904252
Hmm there is a two week sacking rule. A two week inactivity sacking and folding of the comp :S :(
All the Hedgehogs players are on the table for the right offer. Enquire within ;)
I will help out managing this competition if it needs me. Or if no one else wants to host i can do it by myself
Quote from: Noz on October 16, 2012, 10:08:13 PM
I will help out managing this competition if it needs me. Or if no one else wants to host i can do it by myself
Spinking ,Tabs, Tbagrocks have all nominated themselves for the voting ( all coaches will vote on the position) Ringo will be taking care of letting everyone know the details today or shortly.
If you really want the job Noz PM Ringo and nominate yourself for the vote.
It is by self nomination only so yes you have to nominate yourself like the other 3 did :)
A Trade to get the ball rolling again in this fine British competition.
JBsHawks Gives: Nick Haynes + Nat Pick #42
Colliwobblers Gives: Daniel Gorringe + Nat Pick #28
JB to Confirm.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 20, 2012, 11:55:13 PM
A Trade to get the ball rolling again in this fine British competition.
JBsHawks Gives: Nick Haynes + Nat Pick #42
Colliwobblers Gives: Daniel Gorringe + Nat Pick #28
JB to Confirm.
Confirmed
Good trade lads.
A clarification to ensure trades go through the committee more quickly. Can trades now be listed as:
Spinking gives:
JBs Hawks gives:
Reason:
The reason doesn't have to be an essay, but the more info we give the committee, the more receptive they will be to passing the trades.
Trade 12.
Swansea Breakers give: Sam Gibson, Nat Pick 34
Winchester Werewolves give: Josh J Kennedy, Aaron Cornelius
Passed
Trade 13.
Liverpool Lobsters give: Pendles, Rosa, Taylor, Masten, Nat Pick 20
Nottingham Hoods give: Heppell, H. Bennell, Pearce, Nat Pick 54, Nat Pick 55
Passed
Trade 14.
Manchester Magic give: Betts, Jenkins, Nat Pick 33, Nat Pick 36, Nat Pick 40
Swansea Breakers give: Motlop, Nat Pick 3, Nat Pick 70, S Reid(GWS), J. Wilkinson
Passed
Trade 15.
Winchester Wolves give: Redden, Henderson
Crosby Cruisers give: Fyfe, Gunston
Passed
Updated OP to follow
:D I now have no list movements left though. :-\ Maybe a proposal to have another period after both Pre Season & National drafts are done?
Absolutely. I think the other comps do this so we probably should too. Any coaches with an opinion on this, feel free to post them up and I'll make a call on it in the next week.
Quote from: Spinking on October 21, 2012, 02:47:20 PM
Absolutely. I think the other comps do this so we probably should too. Any coaches with an opinion on this, feel free to post them up and I'll make a call on it in the next week.
Let's do it, I'm keen on some more top 20 NAT picks. :P
Nah just draft better 8)
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 21, 2012, 02:55:13 PM
Nah just draft better 8)
MORE PICKS!!! I want atleast 5 of top 20 :-X
The Hebden Bridge Hedgehogs would like to inform the rest of the world that ALL of their players are up for negotiations. Obviously, some will be harder to capture than others but the coaching staff consisting of myself, Ric and Spite are willing to listen to all offers.
Here is our team: http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,63090.0.html
We are in the market for strong fwds and another solid midfielder.
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 20, 2012, 11:57:31 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 20, 2012, 11:55:13 PM
A Trade to get the ball rolling again in this fine British competition.
JBsHawks Gives: Nick Haynes + Nat Pick #42
Colliwobblers Gives: Daniel Gorringe + Nat Pick #28
JB to Confirm.
Confirmed
Yeah good point ok
REASON: The Werewolves have 5 ruckmen on our list but after trading out JKennedy and Cornelius to Ringo recently we are a little light on in FWDS, this trade gets us a DPP MID/FWD rook taken at pick #7 in the draft, and we give to a team in need of another ruckman a bit better than a rookie taken at pick #10. I asked for the player in Haynes and he was taken in our draft earlier than Gorringe so I offered JB a pick exchange in his favor, probably more than I would like in his favor but given the players we are trading and the relative closeness of the picks I think the trade is very even just suits our structures to make the trade.
Plus I have a thing for orange rooks, but not a fan of the red and yellow ones :)
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 21, 2012, 04:31:02 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 20, 2012, 11:57:31 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on October 20, 2012, 11:55:13 PM
A Trade to get the ball rolling again in this fine British competition.
JBsHawks Gives: Nick Haynes + Nat Pick #42
Colliwobblers Gives: Daniel Gorringe + Nat Pick #28
JB to Confirm.
Confirmed
Yeah good point ok
REASON: The Werewolves have 5 ruckmen on our list but after trading out JKennedy and Cornelius to Ringo recently we are a little light on in FWDS, this trade gets us a DPP MID/FWD rook taken at pick #7 in the draft, and we give to a team in need of another ruckman a bit better than a rookie taken at pick #10. I asked for the player in Haynes and he was taken in our draft earlier than Gorringe so I offered JB a pick exchange in his favor, probably more than I would like in his favor but given the players we are trading and the relative closeness of the picks I think the trade is very even just suits our structures to make the trade.
Plus I have a thing for orange rooks, but not a fan of the red and yellow ones :)
Reason: Gorringe a Norwood boy and don't really want to rely on mckernan and Phillips for games If kreuzer is injured. Also improve my draft position.
Just FYI. These are the trades that have been successfully completed.
Trade 1.
Birmingham Bombers receive: Boyd, Betts, Pick 66 Nat Draft, Pick 71 Nat Draft
Crosby Cruisers receive: Christensen, Ward, Pick 27 Nat Draft, Pick 43 Nat Draft, Pick 46 Nat Draft
Swindon Swaggers receive: Shiels, Fasolo, Pick 10 Nat Draft
Trade 2.
Newcastle Falcons receive: J Selwood, Pick 49 Nat Draft, Pick 60 Nat Draft
Winchester Wolves receive: J Redden, Pick 9 Nat Draft, Pick 28 Nat Draft
Trade 3.
Liverpool Lobsters receive: H Taylor, C Masten
Manchester Magic receive: D Swallow, T Mzungu
Trade 4.
Birmingham Bombers receive: L Franklin, T.Mzungu
Manchester Magic receive: A Swallow, E Betts
Trade 5.
Manchester Magic receive: Pick 4 Nat Draft, Pick 33 Nat Draft, Pick 40 Nat Draft
Grope Lane Giants receive: D Swallow, Pick 36 Rookie Draft, Pick 37 Rookie Draft
Trade 6.
Winchester Werewolves receive: Sam Gibson, Nat Pick 34
Swansea Breakers receive: Josh J Kennedy, Aaron Cornelius
Trade 7.
Nottingham Hoods receive: Pendles, Rosa, Taylor, Masten, Nat Pick 20
Liverpool Lobsters receive: Heppell, H. Bennell, Pearce, Nat Pick 54, Nat Pick 55
Trade 8.
Swansea Breakers receive: Betts, Jenkins, Nat Pick 33, Nat Pick 36, Nat Pick 40
Manchester Magic receive: Motlop, Nat Pick 3, Nat Pick 70, S Reid(GWS), J. Wilkinson
Trade 9.
Crosby Cruisers receive: Redden, Henderson
Winchester Werewolves receive: Fyfe, Gunston
Spinking you may also have to make a ruling on compensation picks for retired and delisted players. I have both Drummond and Swift in this category.
Thanks Ringo.
I've just updated the Nat and Rookie threads with the most current selection orders, and with some additional clarifications. In the rookie thread I have indicated that additional picks will be given at the end of the rookie draft until each team meets the required quota of 46 players. This will be in the same snake format as the rest of the rookie draft.
I can see that this may be more of a disadvantage to some than others, as say, Drummond still had reasonable value and is more of a loss than some of the rookies that have been delisted, however trying to implement a compensation system that is agreeable to everyone would be a nightmare. At least this way we are on a level playing field.
Thanks Spinking - Happy with that just could not see anything in the official rules as to when we would get these picks.
Trade 10.
Winchester Warewolves receive: Nick Haynes + Nat Pick #42
Huddersfield Hawks receive: Daniel Gorringe + Nat Pick #28
Passed
OP will be updated in the national draft thread
Awesome love the efficiency :)
Who else wants to trade?
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 21, 2012, 09:56:05 PM
Awesome love the efficiency :)
Who else wants to trade?
Me! Me! Me!
Daniel Hannebery is on the table. This kid is a gun. Want a very early pick or a good young def or fwd.
Others available: http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,62930.0.html
The trade period should be longer....or more movements...10? :P
Quote from: Torpedo10 on October 21, 2012, 10:37:58 PM
The trade period should be longer....or more movements...10? :P
Can't really change it mid-way through. MTTY does say in another thread that we would have a second trade period after the drafts which will last longer. He initially suggested it would be unlimited trades, then maybe 10. I think that would be about right.
Quote from: Spinking on October 21, 2012, 10:41:41 PM
Quote from: Torpedo10 on October 21, 2012, 10:37:58 PM
The trade period should be longer....or more movements...10? :P
Can't really change it mid-way through. MTTY does say in another thread that we would have a second trade period after the drafts which will last longer. He initially suggested it would be unlimited trades, then maybe 10. I think that would be about right.
I just want trades so I get picks. :(
Already got 3 of the top 4! How many you need? :D
Quote from: Spinking on October 21, 2012, 11:02:26 PM
Already got 3 of the top 4! How many you need? :D
Later ones. Uncovered some gems which would be wasteful at 1,3 or 4.
Prepared to give up 1 of my top 4 for 2 top 15 picks. PM with offers.
The Hedgehogs have confirmed their first trade of the trade period!
We Give: Hayden Crozier, Tom Couch and Nat pick 26
Tabs Gives: Billie Smedts, Jarryn Geary and Nat pick 57
Reason: We were looking for players to bolster our backline depth and these two players (Smedts and Geary) provide that. Crozier and Couch have incredible, untapped potential and will fit in well at the Steins. The pick upgrade is to compensate for the lack of experience at AFL level that Couch and Crozier have at this point in time.
Tabs to Confirm.
Nice trade. I'm a big fan of Smedts. Wish Id got him off Tabs first ::)
Quote from: Spinking on October 22, 2012, 08:55:52 PM
Nice trade. I'm a big fan of Smedts. Wish Id got him off Tabs first ::)
Probably my fault! He is a must have in all the teams I am involved in haha probably hyped him up too much! :(
Quote from: elephants on October 22, 2012, 08:40:29 PM
The Hedgehogs have confirmed their first trade of the trade period!
We Give: Hayden Crozier, Tom Couch and Nat pick 26
Tabs Gives: Billie Smedts, Jarryn Geary and Nat pick 57
Reason: We were looking for players to bolster our backline depth and these two players (Smedts and Geary) provide that. Crozier and Couch have incredible, untapped potential and will fit in well at the Steins. The pick upgrade is to compensate for the lack of experience at AFL level that Couch and Crozier have at this point in time.
Tabs to Confirm.
confirm
Quote from: Spite on October 22, 2012, 08:57:55 PM
Quote from: Spinking on October 22, 2012, 08:55:52 PM
Nice trade. I'm a big fan of Smedts. Wish Id got him off Tabs first ::)
Probably my fault! He is a must have in all the teams I am involved in haha probably hyped him up too much! :(
you did try but couldnt get the trade through the committee
I want Geary >:(
Quote from: whatlez on October 22, 2012, 10:34:52 PM
I want Geary >:(
im listening!! Le might also off load him
Quote from: tabs on October 22, 2012, 11:04:49 PM
Quote from: whatlez on October 22, 2012, 10:34:52 PM
I want Geary >:(
im listening!! Le might also off load him
I'm willing to offload. Tabs has kinda confirmed the offer... We are just waiting on Spinks final decision ;)
Trade 12.
Staines Steins receive: Hayden Crozier, Tom Couch, Nat pick 26
Hebden Bridge Hedgehogs receive: Billie Smedts, Jarryn Geary, Nat pick 57
Passed
Huzzah!
that is way too efficient, can we slow down this process??
^ Wtf? What is the problem.
Quote from: whatlez on October 23, 2012, 02:07:04 PM
^ Wtf? What is the problem.
nothing, the last one took a month then failed, that took no time ever.
Should i have said:
that is way too efficient, can we slow down this process?? ;) :P
Why about the trade between the Owls ans the Leeches? There were trades posted after that trade that have already been passed.
I would prefer to not even see it come up confirmed. Use Spink's judgement and pass it himself or reject.
Quote from: BB67th on October 23, 2012, 02:11:00 PM
Why about the trade between the Owls ans the Leeches? There were trades posted after that trade that have already been passed.
Hey BB. Really sorry. I must have missed this trade when going through the thread. Could you and Noz please post it up again and I'll rule on it immediately.
Quote from: Noz on October 10, 2012, 10:23:11 PM
Quote from: BB67th on October 10, 2012, 06:42:12 PM
Big trade reached between the Leeches and Owls
Oxford Owls give: Andrew Carrazzo, Alex Johnson, Jarrad Waite
For
Leeds Leechers give: Greg Broughtan, Josh Tynan and NAT pick 29
Noz to confirm trade
Confirmed
Reason: Needed some more defenders with Carrazzo loosing his DPP plus another pick inside the top 30 is handy
Here is the trade that me and Noz confirmed the other day.
Trade 13.
Leeds Leeches receive: Andrew Carrazzo, Alex Johnson, Jarrad Waite
Oxford Owls receive: Greg Broughton, Josh Tynan and NAT pick 29
Passed
Good trade boys. I reckon it's a slight win to BB if Carrazzo keeps DPP, but thats unlikely so pretty even.
Hey Spink is it possible to do like what CW has and put the trades up for 2nd trade period on 1st page but not have them official just gentlemans agreements??
Hey Pickers. I'll be posting up a thread shortly for the 2nd trade period, where those can be posted up. A the moment Im still trying to get control of the trading thread, so can't do much at the moment.
Are you in any comps where you haven't used up all of your trades? :D
Awesome thanks mate cause to me if its posted up its prietty much confirmed otherwise just got a pm to go on
LOL im hanging in there mate i think i have a couple to go ;D
Not the smartest structural trade by me but I do get one of my favs and a handy pick.
Crosby give: Luke Breust + Nat Pick 27
Huddersfield give: Jed Adcock + Nat pick 67
Important Notice
Collingwood premiership hero from 2011, Heath Shaw is on the table. We are looking for either a strong midfielder or high picks and middle tier depth in return for his services.
Please PM me with any queries or offers.
Cheers :)
*make sure you PM me as it makes it easier to forward stuff onto my co-coaches if offers here are coming through just one person :)
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on October 25, 2012, 08:03:27 PM
Not the smartest structural trade by me but I do get one of my favs and a handy pick.
Crosby give: Luke Breust + Nat Pick 27
Huddersfield give: Jed Adcock + Nat pick 67
Confirmed im on the prowl for older guys and with macdonald + Gilbert my best defenders was a no brainer :)
Trade 14
Huddersfield Hawks receive: Luke Breust + Nat Pick 27
Crosby Cruisers receive: Jed Adcock + Nat pick 67
Passed
I reckon if Adcock keeps his body right, that would be a win to Pickers, but keeping him on the park has been a challenge over the journey, so fairly even. Good trade boys!
Yea I'm under no illusion that pickers wins but my breust man crush is too strong :P
Will now be heavily relient on Russell/Ellis becoming prems for me in def.
Unless someone wants to offer me a good deal for Sylvia/Wingard? ;)
I would be interested in Sylvia. What you looking for in return?
Premo defenders or decent defenders and high draft picks
Anyone looking to offload a forward for a midfielder, let me know. I have a shower load of mids, but with hardly any forwards....
Anyone want Jason Gram? ::)
I'll give you my last rookie pick :p
Still keen for some mid-first round picks (6-15) for a early pick. PM with offers. :)
We'll the rejuvination of this comp lasted all of 2 seconds...... ::)
Why the flower is Spink not administrator yet ??? All well and good some douche thinks MTTY wilk be back but the bloke aint been online for nearly a month..... Leaving this comp gay as cause replys to my trade offers are all about seeing what happens with the comp......
Give Spink 5 green stars, let the guy run comp however he see's best way to run it and maybe it might be as active and respected as other comps...... :)
Hahaha. Hopefully the revival is not done yet! ;)
Almost impossible to get hold of m0nty to get the Mod thing changed. I have however managed to clean up the thread by getting HP to delete the outdated threads and sticky the new important threads. My plan is to keep the 'Rules and Information' and 'Discussion' threads permanently stickied, plus the current seasons thread which will include fixtures, results and the ladder.
The inactivity won't last long. Our trading rules meant that this activity was short lived, but the Nat and Rookie drafts will fire everything up again.
Yeah the Mod thing would be a huge help, but the new threads and the activity from Spinking is first class. I would suggest a PM to every coach in regards to draft dates upcoming is all that needs to be done, and everyone should show up on National draft day and beyond and away we go.
Loving the effort so far, British is looking good. I don't think you can contact Monty by PM, but as I said post a new topic to his attention in feedback and wait, he has proved pretty active in keeping on top of things that go into the feedback thread.
still it is the off season so..... may require some patience :)
Looking good Spinking, really saved this comp. Let me know if you need anything regarding the 'trade jury' :)
Also, best way to contact m0nty is via post in the 'feedback' section
Could I get a compensation pick for Panos delisting please?
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on November 05, 2012, 11:10:16 PM
Could I get a compensation pick for Panos delisting please?
Yep, all delisting will be compensated at the end of the Rookie Draft :)
Quote from: Spinking on November 05, 2012, 11:40:29 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on November 05, 2012, 11:10:16 PM
Could I get a compensation pick for Panos delisting please?
Yep, all delisting will be compensated at the end of the Rookie Draft :)
For de-listing though Spinking have you got a formula worked out for the order, For example I will have 2 for Drummond and Swift so with Panos how are you deciding the order for picks. Nothing in rules. IU would suggest in de-listing order if it can be tracked down.
Quote from: Ringo on November 05, 2012, 11:53:27 PM
Quote from: Spinking on November 05, 2012, 11:40:29 PM
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on November 05, 2012, 11:10:16 PM
Could I get a compensation pick for Panos delisting please?
Yep, all delisting will be compensated at the end of the Rookie Draft :)
For de-listing though Spinking have you got a formula worked out for the order, For example I will have 2 for Drummond and Swift so with Panos how are you deciding the order for picks. Nothing in rules. IU would suggest in de-listing order if it can be tracked down.
My thinking was that the rookie draft continues in the same snake format until all teams have the required number of players. Once a team is full it is skipped. Most teams will probably have at least 1 or 2 delisting a Id think.
Not sure i have done it right but in the AXVS I am giving compensation picks in the order of the picks the players delisted were taken at.
example
pick 500 in Initial draft gets delisted ( that team gets a compensation pick after the Rookie/Preseason draft)
BEFORE THE TEAM THAT HAS
pick 520 in the initial draft gets delisted
and so on.......
Personally I tend to favour Compo picks on draft order picks as it may be fairer. Someone may have a player who was picked at 100 say who was delisted but with a snake draft may have to wait to say 15th pick whereas someone who had player who was picked at 500 may be lucky enough to get pick 1.
Your decvision though,
I agree with what Ringo and Colli have said. That seems a fairer way to run it.
Here is a list of delisted retired players (58) as per the AFL site and the appropriate draft picks in the initial draft. Subsequent trades have not been taken into consideration.
Some may be picked up in draft and could be deleted but if all agree would suggest this is draft order at conclussion of rookie draft
Fletch you appear to really have been hit hard with 9 players either delisted or retired. This has convinced me that to be fair to all that draft should be in the order original players were picked.
Coach Draft Pick Player Picked
Fletch74 144 Jason Gramm
Ringo 201 Simon Buckley
BB67th 206 Sam Iles
Colliwobblers 222 Cameron Wood
Ringo 232 Josh Drummond
Spinking 315 Ryan Hargrave
Fletch74 325 Justin Shermann
Monstrum 326 Andrew Collins
Nails 346 Ricky Pettard
Fletch74 364 Brett Primsall
Monstrum 395 Stephen Clifton
Ringo 417 Thomas Swift
Whatlez 426 Ricky Dyson
Fletch74 432 Cruise Garlett
Tabs 435 Nathan Gordon
Hawka 457 Matthew Bate
Boomz 464 Brendan Lee
Colliwobblers 474 Lucas Cook
JBs-Hawks 492 Tom Schneider
Spinking 495 Sam Lonergan
Fletch74 504 Paul Bower
Fletch74 505 Nathan Djerrkura
Nails 519 Ben Hudson
Spinking 531 Ben Speight
Elephants/Spite 533 Cheyne Stiller
Boomz 536 Michael Ross
Tabs 538 Rhys Cooyou
Spinking 550 Liam Jurrah
JBs-Hawks 553 Michael Osborne
Boomz 572 Ariel Steinberg
Monstrum 575 Andrew Browne
Fletch74 576 Jamie Bennell
Monstrum 578 Addam Maric
Boomz 581 Kyle Reimers
whatlez 583 Piers Flanagan
whatlez 606 Mark Seaby
Fletch74 612 Brodie Moles
whatlez 619 Orren Stephenson
Spinking 622 Jonathan Ceglar
BB67th 623 Andrew McQualter
JBs-Hawks 625 Josh Toy
Ringo 633 Matt Campbell
Nails 634 Michael Coad
Holzman/bomberboy0618 640 Dylan McNeil
Monstrum 647 Gerrick Weedon
Fletch74 649 Chance Bateman
BB67th 659 James Hawksley
Nails 670 Luke Power
JBs-Hawks 672 Matthew Panos
Holzman/bomberboy0618 676 Blake Bray
Elephants/Spite 677 Brad Harvey
Colliwobblers 679 Jarrad Boumann
Boomz 680 Alex Magin
MTTY 681 Simon Hogan
Fletch74 685 Jeromey Webberley
MTTY 688 Hayden Jolly
Colliwobblers 690 Rohan Kerr
Spinking 694 Ben Warren
BB67th 695 Andrew Strijk
Hawka 696 Ben McKinley
Spinking if you like can send you thespreadsheet I have extracted. You will have to check to see if any of these players have been traded. For ease suggest that if they have they still retain the same order in draft.
Apologies for the formatting but can not get it right.
Edit: None of these players appear to have been traded.
woah 0 delistings for me.
wow Fletch, that is unlucky mate
Quote from: Ricochet on November 06, 2012, 02:33:32 PM
wow Fletch, that is unlucky mate
TBH, I didn't know I'd lost some of those players like Garlett, Bower, and Djerrkura for instance. They are the breaks I guess.
Hopefully, some of them get picked up, like Gram for instance. He's a killer >:( and a stalker :P
Yea Fletch a few surprises for me as well as I was compiling the list. But as you say them the breaks. Also as I stated convinced me that the final draft order should be in order picked as it is the fairest system. In your case you would not want a late pick for a player you picked at 144 in the Draft.
Thanks heaps for doing all that work Ringo! I do agree that we should implement a compensation system, and most seem in favour of that. I'll throw some rules together and see what the populous think.. :)
Seaby, Big O and Piers :(
But HH Is DPP :D
Quote from: Torpedo10 on November 06, 2012, 02:29:19 PM
woah 0 delistings for me.
+1 :)
Really surprised buckley & collins were delisted i wanted both those guys. And Piers was the man!
yeah i had a few too, I agree picks should be in order of when delisted/retired players were taken in the initial draft. as in Ringo's list should be the order.
need to just update list after AFL preseason draft, and BEFORE british rookie/preseason draft, getting everyones preferences whether to delist or keep players who DO get picked up by other clubs in the AFL preseason draft.
with the british draft starting straight after the afl draft going to have to get everyone to tell spinking what they want to do with any RE-LISTED players before we get to the last round of the british draft or ?
My thoughts on this are any players that are reselected by other teams are retained by current owners and deleted from list. We should only have the comp picks for players no longer playing in the AFL. My opinion only, based on the fact that we have just drafted our teams so any players still playing should be retained.
Quote from: Ringo on November 12, 2012, 07:50:04 AM
My thoughts on this are any players that are reselected by other teams are retained by current owners and deleted from list. We should only have the comp picks for players no longer playing in the AFL. My opinion only, based on the fact that we have just drafted our teams so any players still playing should be retained.
+1 I am in total agreement, the only thing being that if a player like Gram does not get picked up again, no bias intended, that the compensation is better than just having a pick after the ND has finished.
I picked Gram on his football proess, not expecting him to be sacked. This is almost like the McCarthy situation IMO.
Maybe something like...
A delisted player from 100-200 can be an after 3rd (could make it 2nd) rd is completed pick.... 200-300 after 4th rd pick... 300-400 after 5th rd then the rest all after end of draft...
(not sure how many ND rounds there are...)
That something like that would seem fair to me IMO. Replacing Gram with a spud no-one ever wanted seems a bit rough for Fletch imo
i don't think any compensation picks should be given DURING the national draft.
99% of these guys delisted or retired were VERY LATE picks and shouldn't be able to be replaced by gun kids in our national draft.
in the case of Fletch, I agree, not JMac like he was 22 and rapidly improving, i took him at round 11, but certainly I think Gram warrants a national draft compensation pick around maybe end of round 4 , 3 would be generous? leave that to the boss...
Jmac was for me end of round 2.
As for ALL the other delisted and retired players i think end of rookie draft compensation picks is where we should get the picks.
and yes I have 4 players delisted so not being biased :)
Quote from: Nails on November 12, 2012, 09:01:19 AM
That something like that would seem fair to me IMO. Replacing Gram with a spud no-one ever wanted seems a bit rough for Fletch imo
That's all dependent on if he doesn't get picked up. I'm happy to have him if he gets picked up.
Great Suggestion Nails was wondering for those that had early picks that retired or were delisted and then having to wait till pick 73 in rookie draft for compensation picks. Need to wait till after the pre season draft to see which players are being picked up by other clubs.
With 4 rounds in the Rookie Draft I would suggest as follows:
Teams with players not playing who had picks 100 - 200 Compensation picks after Round 1
Teams with players not playing who had picks 201 - 300 Compensation picks after Round 2
Teams with players not playing who had picks 301 - 400 Compensation picks adter Round 3
Balance after completion of Round 4.
This formula is reasonable as it will give a coach who had an early pick 2 picks in Round 1 of the Rookie Draft and so on. Fair compensation imo.
i'll go along with whatever, Ringo/Nails system seems reasonable, Ringos formula of compensation during the "rookie" draft as laid out above seems very reasonable indeed.
except for special exceptions which i think there are only a few, me (Jmac) fletch (gram?) i think Ringo and maybe one or two others had a really high pick retire/delisted as well? drummond?
anyway i'll go with the flow but that looks fair to me Ringo.
Good debate lads. I agree with Colli that the compensation picks shouldn't be in the Nat, and with Ringo, Nails etc, that there needs to be a tiered compensation scheme.
I'll post up some rules suggestions tonight for comment.
It has to be the Rookie Draft, as I believe that in my case, my player can still be picked up, CW's can't be, so that is fair.
If Gram was to be picked up in the Pre-Season draft and I had compensation in the ND, that would not be right...
very fair of you fletch but under the gram circumstances think a better than normal compo pick should go your way maybe start of rookie or end of national, not sure but that was another unexpected event that bends the "normal compensation rules" just my opinion tho.
It will be hard to get a purely Fair system but hopefully in Fletch's case Gram gets picked up. Maybe just amend my proposal to any picks under 180 (Top 10 picks for all teams in the Draft) have a priority pick in the Rooke Draft eg 1st picks. This may equate to losing a top 10 pick from your side.
Makiing the suggestion as follows: (I have redrafted slightly and leave it open to debate)
Draft picks under 180 - Priority picks in the Rookie Draft. (Top 10 picks per team in Draft) Currently one pick
Draft picks 181- 270 Compensation picks after Round 1 (these were picks 11 - 15 in draft) Currently 4 picks
Draft Picks 271 - 360 Compensation picks after Round 2 (these would be picks 15 - 20 in draft) Currently 4 picks
DrafT Picks 361 - 450 Compensation picks after Round 3 (these would be picks 20 - 25 in Draft) Currently 4 picks
Balance after Round 4
Basically this means that we are giving prioity picks in the Rookie draft to teams that have lost players from their top 25 picks.
Rules around this would be that the order would be on the basis of picks and that the player no longer is playing in the AFL eg retired or not picked up by another club. If you still choose to delist one of these players that have been picked up by another club you will revert to picking after the Rookie draft.
Hope this makes sense. But really needed to concentrate on getting suitable compensation for a team losing a top 10 pick. To show my Fairness could have made it top 15 and included my own 2 players who are retired and de-listed but I believe a top 10 pick really deserves it if not picked up.
Please feel free to pull apart or discuss further (Originally thinking next 10 picks for the compo picks after each round but thought that may be a bit too generous.)
Anyone interested in trading?
Quote from: Noz on November 12, 2012, 01:22:47 PM
Anyone interested in trading?
I am, don't really know what I want though :P
I am interested in trading still too, if anyone wants to offer me anything.
Looking to stock up on draft picks.
First retiree at the Magic
Clint Bartram
Wish you best of luck at other clubs.
Was picked up at Pick 558.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on November 14, 2012, 07:36:58 PM
Quote from: Ringo on November 12, 2012, 12:49:18 PM
It will be hard to get a purely Fair system but hopefully in Fletch's case Gram gets picked up. Maybe just amend my proposal to any picks under 180 (Top 10 picks for all teams in the Draft) have a priority pick in the Rooke Draft eg 1st picks. This may equate to losing a top 10 pick from your side.
Makiing the suggestion as follows: (I have redrafted slightly and leave it open to debate)
Draft picks under 180 - Priority picks in the Rookie Draft. (Top 10 picks per team in Draft) Currently one pick
Draft picks 181- 270 Compensation picks after Round 1 (these were picks 11 - 15 in draft) Currently 4 picks
Draft Picks 271 - 360 Compensation picks after Round 2 (these would be picks 15 - 20 in draft) Currently 4 picks
DrafT Picks 361 - 450 Compensation picks after Round 3 (these would be picks 20 - 25 in Draft) Currently 4 picks
Balance after Round 4
Basically this means that we are giving prioity picks in the Rookie draft to teams that have lost players from their top 25 picks.
Rules around this would be that the order would be on the basis of picks and that the player no longer is playing in the AFL eg retired or not picked up by another club. If you still choose to delist one of these players that have been picked up by another club you will revert to picking after the Rookie draft.
Hope this makes sense. But really needed to concentrate on getting suitable compensation for a team losing a top 10 pick. To show my Fairness could have made it top 15 and included my own 2 players who are retired and de-listed but I believe a top 10 pick really deserves it if not picked up.
Please feel free to pull apart or discuss further (Originally thinking next 10 picks for the compo picks after each round but thought that may be a bit too generous.)
all in all it seems spot on to me Ringo, not sure I will employ such a plan in AXVS but this has forced the discussion ???
The problem for me is where to draw the line/ cut off for each bracket, but your list looks pretty evenly spread and fair compensation for each bracket.
I also agree with you 100% on if they are picked up by another club you can still delist but you only get a "standard" end of draft compo pick.
Not sure if Spinking has posted elsewhere a final rule I'll go along with whatever but this seems pretty good to me .
We moved to the discussion thread and listed the rules there so as to not clog up the trade thread. Have had 2 more de-listings today with both Bartram and Skinner retiring.
3 more to come from Fremantle tomorrow.....
Yes Ringo I was sure I had seen something somewhere from Spinking on the final rules, I even commented on it :)
deleted my post here :)
Hi Folks.
I've clarified the rule on Trades to reflect that a List Movement is defined as where a player from your existing squad is traded to another team.
This means that trades of draft picks, or players who have come into your team during the trade periods will not count as list movements.
As such the current List Movement counts are:
Winchester: 5
Crosby: 5
Liverpool: 4
Manchester: 5
Oxford: 3
Birmingham: 3
Nottingham: 3
Leeds: 2
Hebden Bridge: 2
Staines: 2
Huddersfield: 2
Swindon: 2
Swansea: 1
Newcastle: 1
Grope Lane: 0
Bradford: 0
Hastings: 0
Bilston: 0
As above. Teams that hit the cap of 5 can continue to trade but only using draft picks, or players who have entered their team through the trade period.
After a decent defender pick 30 will be used to secure this
just read this entire thread made me lol a few times
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on November 28, 2012, 05:51:14 AM
just read this entire thread made me lol a few times
Thanks.