Progressive Scores for Round 5

Started by North Melbournes Finest, April 23, 2011, 03:24:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ringo

Quote from: Ringo on April 23, 2011, 03:55:57 PM
333 from 3 Goddard, Riewolt (let down again) and Adcock turning into a premium if he stays healthy
Now 460 from 4 with 127 from Matera (coming down to earth now with Gibbs, Duigan and Otten not firing at the moment to half time)

North Melbournes Finest

#31
Hence why I said it should probably be moved from where it was...  ::)

Captain serious. Wouldn't moving a thread be better than creating a new one if you want to be a stickler for the rules?

Rusty00

Had Trengove (95), D Stanley (97) and D Harris (105) on the bench  :'(

North Melbournes Finest

Duigan / Otten / Gibbs / especially Scott Thompson playing pretty damn bad, need them to lift in the 2nd half or a terrible score is coming up for me.

roo boys!

Quote from: North Melbournes Finest on April 23, 2011, 07:27:38 PM
Quote from: roo boys! on April 23, 2011, 07:25:50 PM
555 from 6.

Bock and Smith low scores, but Matera and Swallow I'm happy with.
Amazing man considering that Swallow was on 22 at haf time with 5 touches.  And like 39 at 3 quarter time. Smith I'm a little bit dissapointed with, he had a nice score at quarter time / half time and really bottomed out.
Yeah it was an amazing quarter.

Gibbs/Otten/Duigan not dominating, but Juddy is :)

pyronerd

Quote from: roo boys! on April 23, 2011, 10:08:14 PM
Quote from: North Melbournes Finest on April 23, 2011, 07:27:38 PM
Quote from: roo boys! on April 23, 2011, 07:25:50 PM
555 from 6.

Bock and Smith low scores, but Matera and Swallow I'm happy with.
Amazing man considering that Swallow was on 22 at haf time with 5 touches.  And like 39 at 3 quarter time. Smith I'm a little bit dissapointed with, he had a nice score at quarter time / half time and really bottomed out.
Yeah it was an amazing quarter.

Gibbs/Otten/Duigan not dominating, but Juddy is :)
goooooo juddy :D

PICCOLLO

Harris and Stanley on the bench.  The rookie selection curse continues.  711/7

eagles929406

1078/11  only 2 rookies left to play so not too bad kept godd as capt over swan (crazy i know)

Prospector_1

772/8, thank-you Stiffy!

Matera for Krak yet to be counted. Swan as Captain yet to come.

Muneem

WOW, I'm having a shocker this round compared to everyone else. 624 from 8   :-\, flower you Yarran. Didnt have Stanley or Harris starting. Massive FML. :(

roo boys!

Don't worry, I'm 870 from 10 :( Shocker of a round...

Fletch74

Quote from: roo boys! on April 23, 2011, 11:26:45 PM
Don't worry, I'm 870 from 10 :( Shocker of a round...
900 from 11, beat that...

331 from 3 on the bench who won't count...

North Melbournes Finest

900 from 10.

Not sure if that's really too bad, I have 3 rookies to go. 2 of which have scored 100 or close to a few times (Liberatore/Heppell) the other is Richardson.

It seems bad if you just read 900 from 10, but when you consider I have 10 prems to go + Captain + 2 good rookies + dudish rookie. I'm thinking 2100, which wouldn't be overly bad considering how many rookies I've had to play in this multi bye, I think I'm going to have to trade Krakouer out now and fish for an uprade early.

bomberboy0618


North Melbournes Finest

Quote from: bomberboy0618 on April 23, 2011, 11:51:07 PM
1021/12, flowering sc.
Don't worry, judging by everyones reactions 2000-2100 is going to be an alright score. What I'm wondering is how flowered I'm going to be next week with Sandi / Enright / Pav / Broughton out.