(http://i46.tinypic.com/313j7eq.png)
Group 1
Swansea Breakers 2W 0L 110%
Serbian Eagles 1W 1L 101%
Sao Paulo Pumas 1W 1L 101%
Manila Folders 0W 2L 89%
Group 2
Mexico City Suns 2W 0L 110%
Bangladesh Bears 1W 1L 107%
Bradford Badgers 1W 1L 103%
Russian Roulettes 0W 2L 82%
Group 3
Winchester Werewolves 1W 1L 113%
Buenos Aires Armadillos 1W 1L 103%
Macedonian Wolves 1W 1L 97%
Mongolian Lambs 1W 1L 88%
Group 4
Swedish Metal 2W 0L 108%
Nottingham Hoods 1W 1D 0L 112%
Moscow Spetnaz 0W 1D 1L 97%
Taiwon Dolphins 0W 2L 84%
Multipliers:
Worlds: 1
Euro: 1.0289
Asia: 0.7722
British: 0.8657
Round 1:
Sao Paulo Pumas 131 lost to Swansea Breakers 145
Serbian Eagles 155 defeated Manila Folders 134
Mexico City Suns 150 defeated Bradford Badgers 144
Russian Roulettes 126 lost to Bangladesh Bears 161
Buenos Aires Armadillos 162 defeated Winchester Werewolves 151
Macedonian Wolves 144 lost to Mongolian Lambs 155
Moscow Spetnaz 140 drew with Nottingham Hoods 140
Swedish Metal 147 defeated Taiwon Dolphins 132
Round 2:
Sao Paulo Pumas 156 defeated Serbian Eagles 139
Swansea Breakers 130 defeated Manila Folders 120
Mexico City Suns 144 defeated Russian Roulettes 124
Bradford Badgers 156 defeated Bangladesh Bears 140
Buenos Aires Armadillos 136 lost to Macedonian Wolves 139
Winchester Werewolves 171 defeated Mongolian Lambs 123
Moscow Spetnaz 132 lost to Swedish Metal 139
Nottingham Hoods 141 defeated Taiwon Dolphins 110
Round 3:
Sao Paulo Pumas 154 defeated Manila Folders 121
Serbian Eagles 140 defeated Swansea Breakers 130
Mexico City Suns 154 lost to Bangladesh Bears 159
Bradford Badgers 131 lost to Russian Roulettes 145
Buenos Aires Armadillos 169 defeated Mongolian Lambs 140
Winchester Werewolves 164 defeated Macedonian Wolves 143
Moscow Spetnaz 136 defeated Taiwon Dolphins 106
Nottingham Hoods 127 lost to Swedish Metal 142
Come on Lambies! Will be a few selection headaches this week for us but hopefully we can get close to our Best XV on the park.
Macedonian Wolves:
B: Aarom Mullett, Greg Broughton, Taylor Duryea, David Swallow
M: Jobe Watson(C), Brent Stanton(VC), Brad Ebert, Chris Masten
R: Matthew Leuenberger
F: Jack Gunston, Luke Breust, Michael Walters, Jay Schulz
U: Liam Shiels, Bernie Vince
E: Brad Crouch, Josh Gibson, Jackson Merrett
Subject to change once teams will be named.
Cairo missed out on this by percentage I think. :(
Also, gl;hf to the Dolphins.
But yeah, go Lambs! #baaa
Watch the brwakers pump out a 2000+ score guys 8)
Quote from: nrich102 on March 26, 2014, 09:51:48 PM
Watch the brwakers pump out a 2000+ score guys 8)
So you're expecting over 500 points of improvement from the first round?
Also holz what's the deal with the scaling this year?
Go Badgers!
Quote from: Honey Badger on March 26, 2014, 10:04:58 PM
Quote from: nrich102 on March 26, 2014, 09:51:48 PM
Watch the brwakers pump out a 2000+ score guys 8)
So you're expecting over 500 points of improvement from the first round?
Yeah... I am.
Had a few guys missing from our best XV last week, but should be a full strength team this week
Holy shower group 4 has some pretty ordinary teams. Group 2 has some strong sides though :(
Russian Roulettes
B: Hodge (VC), Lumumba, Burgoyne, Hansen
M: Ablett (C), Griffen, Treloar, ROK
R: Hill (Stephen) (OOP)
U: Greene, Moloney
F: Chappy, Howlett, Cameron, Hunter
Emerg: Broadbent (def), McKay (mid), Kerridge (mid/fwd)
**modified team ....... Kreuzer out .......Stephen Hill into the ruck lol
In world XVs Buenos Aires Armadillos are using the "attack" strategy...
Not sure how you're going to work that one out Holz ;D
Two quick questions.
1. How will scaling work? Personally I hope it is just a simple percentage multiplier.
2. Do we need to post teams here or do we just need the admins to pass on scores for the relevant teams?
Just an average of the comps than using it as a ratio. You don't need to post in here unless your from the euro.
B
M Lids (VC),
R
F
U
E Gibbs
I know is late, was busy doing AF please accept it, only going to be about 4 miuntes late
D - C. Enright, J. Bartel, R. Murphy, L. McPharlin
M - L. Montagna (C), S. Johnson (VC), D. Swan, A. Cooney
R - D. Cox
F - N. Riewoldt, L. Parker, D. Hale, J. Riewoldt
UTI - D. Cross, NDS
EMG - L. Hayes, C. Newman, J. Brown
forgot I had simpson and martin, both killing it. Major mistake on my behalf.
How's resting gonna work Holz? HB asked the question
Quote from: ossie85 on March 28, 2014, 01:40:14 PM
How's resting gonna work Holz? HB asked the question
Ideally would want to remove it but it's not that big a factor if it's left in.
See thing is I don't think I can afford to be resting players in worlds since we also play the champions league matches so even if I was playing someone weak in worlds there would be a strong opponent in here. Guess I was hoping it could be something like I choose to rest Sloane in WXV for Adams, but in the CL I actually have Sloane playing over Adams.
Was a 1% chance that that was going to happen though...
Quote from: Honey Badger on March 28, 2014, 05:13:30 PM
See thing is I don't think I can afford to be resting players in worlds since we also play the champions league matches so even if I was playing someone weak in worlds there would be a strong opponent in here. Guess I was hoping it could be something like I choose to rest Sloane in WXV for Adams, but in the CL I actually have Sloane playing over Adams.
Was a 1% chance that that was going to happen though...
Thats what should happen
Id say if they chose to rest someone then that costs them but then they dont get the mulitplier on that player then following week.
Quote from: ossie85 on March 28, 2014, 05:35:48 PM
Quote from: Honey Badger on March 28, 2014, 05:13:30 PM
See thing is I don't think I can afford to be resting players in worlds since we also play the champions league matches so even if I was playing someone weak in worlds there would be a strong opponent in here. Guess I was hoping it could be something like I choose to rest Sloane in WXV for Adams, but in the CL I actually have Sloane playing over Adams.
Was a 1% chance that that was going to happen though...
Thats what should happen
Actually I'm for this, just need to work out the score assuming the rest didn't happen. Shouldn't be too hard.
Ok sweet :)
Yeah will be very easy to work out since it's just swapping 2 players around :)
Hibberd Shaw Adcock Eski
Pendles (C) Goddard Lids Barlow
Sandi
Cloke Lecras Boomer JJK
Gibbs Boyd
Goldy Douglas Petrie
Quote from: Holzman on March 28, 2014, 08:04:29 PM
Hibberd Shaw Adcock Eski
Pendles (C) Goddard Lids Barlow
Sandi
Cloke Lecras Boomer JJK
Gibbs Boyd
Goldy Douglas Petrie
Don't want to be the guy who says it, but Goddard and Hibberd had already started when you posted this.
Quote from: whatlez on March 28, 2014, 09:49:42 PM
Quote from: Holzman on March 28, 2014, 08:04:29 PM
Hibberd Shaw Adcock Eski
Pendles (C) Goddard Lids Barlow
Sandi
Cloke Lecras Boomer JJK
Gibbs Boyd
Goldy Douglas Petrie
Don't want to be the guy who says it, but Goddard and Hibberd had already started when you posted this.
Bending the rules of his own competition. :P
Quote from: whatlez on March 28, 2014, 09:49:42 PM
Quote from: Holzman on March 28, 2014, 08:04:29 PM
Hibberd Shaw Adcock Eski
Pendles (C) Goddard Lids Barlow
Sandi
Cloke Lecras Boomer JJK
Gibbs Boyd
Goldy Douglas Petrie
Don't want to be the guy who says it, but Goddard and Hibberd had already started when you posted this.
Fanfooty clock is 15 minutes fast. Game was scheduled to start at 7.50, therefore posting at 8.04 FF time was really 7.49
Quote from: Honey Badger on March 28, 2014, 10:09:07 PM
Quote from: whatlez on March 28, 2014, 09:49:42 PM
Quote from: Holzman on March 28, 2014, 08:04:29 PM
Hibberd Shaw Adcock Eski
Pendles (C) Goddard Lids Barlow
Sandi
Cloke Lecras Boomer JJK
Gibbs Boyd
Goldy Douglas Petrie
Don't want to be the guy who says it, but Goddard and Hibberd had already started when you posted this.
Fanfooty clock is 15 minutes fast. Game was scheduled to start at 7.50, therefore posting at 8.04 FF time was really 7.49
Well FF time for me is 14 minutes. So who do we believe?
Quote from: Honey Badger on March 28, 2014, 10:09:07 PM
Quote from: whatlez on March 28, 2014, 09:49:42 PM
Quote from: Holzman on March 28, 2014, 08:04:29 PM
Hibberd Shaw Adcock Eski
Pendles (C) Goddard Lids Barlow
Sandi
Cloke Lecras Boomer JJK
Gibbs Boyd
Goldy Douglas Petrie
Don't want to be the guy who says it, but Goddard and Hibberd had already started when you posted this.
Fanfooty clock is 15 minutes fast. Game was scheduled to start at 7.50, therefore posting at 8.04 FF time was really 7.49
I left it very late. Was doing my SC team saw there was only 4 minutes left than posted this team and there was 30 seconds left on the SC site. Just got in on time.
Already lost Simpson and Martin because of the Thursday game.
I'm curious as to how this wen, who's winning?
Round 1:
Sao Paulo Pumas 133-HGA v Swansea Breakers
Serbian Eagles 155 defeated Manila Folders 134
Mexico City Suns 154 -HGA v Bradford Badgers 140
Russian Roulettes 126 lost to Bangladesh Bears 161
Buenos Aires Armadillos 162 defeated Winchester Werewolves 153
Macedonian Wolves 144 lost to Mongolian Lambs 155
Moscow Spetnaz 140 lost to Nottingham Hoods 142
Swedish Metal 147 defeated Taiwon Dolphins 132
remaining results pending HGA.
Sorry for the delay guys...
Pumas = 131
Suns = 150
Well I look forward to getting destroyed this week by the Eagles...
Quote from: Honey Badger on April 04, 2014, 01:51:22 PM
Well I look forward to getting destroyed this week by the Eagles...
not too sure on that, lost 2 of my best mids in Barlow and Lids.
Quote from: Holzman on April 04, 2014, 07:06:30 PM
Quote from: Honey Badger on April 04, 2014, 01:51:22 PM
Well I look forward to getting destroyed this week by the Eagles...
not too sure on that, lost 2 of my best mids in Barlow and Lids.
Have you not seen the rabble of a team I have at the moment?
Notice Breakers score not updated should be 168 without HGA
Quote from: Ringo on April 04, 2014, 09:25:13 PM
Notice Breakers score not updated should be 168 without HGA
168 times the multiplier is 145, I think. Haven't got a calculator on me but sounds right.
Quote from: Holzman on April 05, 2014, 01:01:54 AM
Quote from: Ringo on April 04, 2014, 09:25:13 PM
Notice Breakers score not updated should be 168 without HGA
168 times the multiplier is 145, I think. Haven't got a calculator on me but sounds right.
Some good maths skills without a calculator holz.
That puts the Pumas percentage at 90.3 when using the score of 131, and the Breakers at 110.7
Quote from: Honey Badger on April 05, 2014, 09:52:43 AM
Quote from: Holzman on April 05, 2014, 01:01:54 AM
Quote from: Ringo on April 04, 2014, 09:25:13 PM
Notice Breakers score not updated should be 168 without HGA
168 times the multiplier is 145, I think. Haven't got a calculator on me but sounds right.
Some good maths skills without a calculator holz.
That puts the Pumas percentage at 90.3 when using the score of 131, and the Breakers at 110.7
thanks HB, all up to date now.
only sandi for me last night, would have loved barlow out there. Alot resting on captain Pendles this week, need another big one from him.
British xv scores without HGA
Swansea Breakers 150
Bradford Badgers 180
Winchester Werewolves 198
Nottingham Hoods 163
Versed the Bears
#easywin
Sao Paulo Pumas 156 defeated Serbian Eagles 139
Swansea Breakers 130 defeated Manila Folders 120
Mexico City Suns 144 defeated Russian Roulettes 124
Bradford Badgers 156 defeated Bangladesh Bears 140
Buenos Aires Armadillos 136 lost to Macedonian Wolves 139
Winchester Werewolves 171 defeated Mongolian Lambs 123
Moscow Spetnaz 132 lost to Swedish Metal 139
Nottingham Hoods 141 defeated Taiwon Dolphins 110
Asian XV scores without HGA
Bangladesh Bears - 1814
Taiwan Dolphins - 1424
Manila Folders - 1553
Mongolian Lambs - 1596
Not happy with any of those scores this week really, besides the Bears who did decent. Need better performances from Asia!
Plenty of good asain scores outside of those 4 though
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on April 07, 2014, 09:03:51 PM
Plenty of good asain scores outside of those 4 though
Yep, the top 4 is going to look a bit different this year I think!
Beat the mighty Eagles! :o
With a below par performance from the Breakers this week happy to get away with the win.
Sorry guys!
Buenos Aires: 131
Moscow: 132
Quote from: ossie85 on April 08, 2014, 09:50:51 AM
Sorry guys!
Buenos Aires: 131
Moscow: 132
This is where it gets a tad confusing though...
For Champions league we wouldn't have rested Boyd and would have played Boyd over Kelly (our 15th named player)
Quote from: Nails on April 08, 2014, 10:07:20 AM
Quote from: ossie85 on April 08, 2014, 09:50:51 AM
Sorry guys!
Buenos Aires: 131
Moscow: 132
This is where it gets a tad confusing though...
For Champions league we wouldn't have rested Boyd and would have played Boyd over Kelly (our 15th named player)
That's my preference also, but Holz is the boss
You must not have read his reply where he agreed with you after the initial post Oss. That's what we're doing, hence why I brought it up
Quote from: Holzman on March 28, 2014, 06:56:19 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on March 28, 2014, 05:35:48 PM
Quote from: Honey Badger on March 28, 2014, 05:13:30 PM
See thing is I don't think I can afford to be resting players in worlds since we also play the champions league matches so even if I was playing someone weak in worlds there would be a strong opponent in here. Guess I was hoping it could be something like I choose to rest Sloane in WXV for Adams, but in the CL I actually have Sloane playing over Adams.
Was a 1% chance that that was going to happen though...
Thats what should happen
Actually I'm for this, just need to work out the score assuming the rest didn't happen. Shouldn't be too hard.
Are you able to adjust my score please? :D
Quote from: Nails on April 08, 2014, 10:13:42 AM
You must not have read his reply where he agreed with you after the initial post Oss. That's what we're doing, hence why I brought it up
Quote from: Holzman on March 28, 2014, 06:56:19 PM
Quote from: ossie85 on March 28, 2014, 05:35:48 PM
Quote from: Honey Badger on March 28, 2014, 05:13:30 PM
See thing is I don't think I can afford to be resting players in worlds since we also play the champions league matches so even if I was playing someone weak in worlds there would be a strong opponent in here. Guess I was hoping it could be something like I choose to rest Sloane in WXV for Adams, but in the CL I actually have Sloane playing over Adams.
Was a 1% chance that that was going to happen though...
Thats what should happen
Actually I'm for this, just need to work out the score assuming the rest didn't happen. Shouldn't be too hard.
Are you able to adjust my score please? :D
I did miss it :P
It also means you won't have the rest bonus the next week
Buenos Aires: 136
Quote from: Honey Badger on April 07, 2014, 11:54:05 PM
Beat the mighty Eagles! :o
just had to come up against the pumas of old. Thought I had it in the bag given your last 2 games than you go bang and barlow lids miss with lecca going down injured early.
congrats. Will be a big battle to go through in our group. 3 teams for 2 spots.
with you having the folders I need to beat the breakers next week by a big margin or I could go out of the group on 2 wins.
Quote from: Nails on April 08, 2014, 10:07:20 AM
Quote from: ossie85 on April 08, 2014, 09:50:51 AM
Sorry guys!
Buenos Aires: 131
Moscow: 132
This is where it gets a tad confusing though...
For Champions league we wouldn't have rested Boyd and would have played Boyd over Kelly (our 15th named player)
The thing is you never actually stated who you were resting him for. Surely if you are resting someone you need to come in here and announce who they have been rested for. Otherwise you're just coming in here after the round has finished and saying you rested Boyd for the lowest scorer from your mids. If you did this and I missed it then I apologise.
Although turns out it makes no difference to the result (apart from percentage).
Think in future the guys from the worlds have to announce who they have been rested for before the round starts to avoid any controversy
Quote from: Honey Badger on April 08, 2014, 07:55:58 PM
Although turns out it makes no difference to the result (apart from percentage).
Think in future the guys from the worlds have to announce who they have been rested for before the round starts to avoid any controversy
Sounds fair
Quote from: Honey Badger on April 08, 2014, 07:53:59 PM
Quote from: Nails on April 08, 2014, 10:07:20 AM
Quote from: ossie85 on April 08, 2014, 09:50:51 AM
Sorry guys!
Buenos Aires: 131
Moscow: 132
This is where it gets a tad confusing though...
For Champions league we wouldn't have rested Boyd and would have played Boyd over Kelly (our 15th named player)
Otherwise you're just coming in here after the round has finished and saying you rested Boyd for the lowest scorer from your mids.
If I were doing that then maybe I would have said Boyd was replacing someone other than my 2nd flowering highest scoring mid from my team. Kelly scored the 2nd most of 5 midfielders in my team.
It's simply who I would have had dropped for Boyd if there was no resting in Worlds. I name my players in the order of preference.
i.e. my 4 best mids in the mids and then the 5th best one goes into the utilities which is why Kelly was there. Boyd is clearly better than Kelly based on 104 average last year and Kelly has been a 90s average like his whole career.
QuoteGroup 3
Winchester Werewolves 1W 1L 113%
Buenos Aires Armadillos 1W 1L 103%
Macedonian Wolves 1W 1L 97%
Mongolian Lambs 1W 1L 88%
1 W 1 L each, that shower cray. Percentage totally irrelevant now. Win and you're in. Lose and you're out.
QuoteGroup 4
Swedish Metal 2W 0L 108%
Nottingham Hoods 1W 1D 0L 112%
Moscow Spetnaz 0W 1D 1L 97%
Taiwon Dolphins 0W 2L 84%
Nice to see my Metal boys already through to the next stage :)
British xv Scores (exc HGA and bonus)
Swansea Breakers 150
Bradford Badgers 151
Winchester Werewolves 189
Nottingham Hoods 147
WXV scores (excl. HGA and adjusting Buenos Aires and Mexico City for Resting)
Buenos Aires: 1692
Mexico City: 1538
Moscow: 1361
Sao Paulo: 1543
Actually, all 4 teams were playing away this week!
Would of gotten flogged :(
Sorry guys will be up tomorrow, huge exam today.
Quote from: Holzman on April 14, 2014, 10:54:51 PM
Sorry guys will be up tomorrow, huge exam today.
Best of luck holz
Yes Hoz Hope all goes well and the questions relate to your cramming.
Good luck Hz
Good luck Holz. Here are the Asian XV scores for this week.
Manila Folders - 1567
Mongolian Lambs - 1813
Bangladesh Bears - 2056
Taiwan Dolphins - 1374
Quote from: BB67th on April 15, 2014, 11:05:30 AM
Good luck Holz. Here are the Asian XV scores for this week.
Manila Folders - 1567
Mongolian Lambs - 1813
Bangladesh Bears - 2056
Taiwan Dolphins - 1374
And Lambs bow out of the Champions League.
Round 3:
Sao Paulo Pumas 154 defeated Manila Folders 121
Serbian Eagles 140 defeated Swansea Breakers 130
Mexico City Suns 154 lost to Bangladesh Bears 159
Bradford Badgers 131 lost to Russian Roulettes 145
Buenos Aires Armadillos 169 defeated Mongolian Lambs 140
Winchester Werewolves 164 defeated Macedonian Wolves 143
Moscow Spetnaz 136 defeated Taiwon Dolphins 106
Nottingham Hoods 127 lost to Swedish Metal 142
Quote from: Holzman on April 15, 2014, 02:37:42 PM
Round 3:
Sao Paulo Pumas 154 defeated Manila Folders 121
Serbian Eagles 140 defeated Swansea Breakers 130
Mexico City Suns 154 lost to Bangladesh Bears 159
Bradford Badgers 131 lost to Russian Roulettes 145
Buenos Aires Armadillos 169 defeated Mongolian Lambs 140
Winchester Werewolves 164 defeated Macedonian Wolves 143
Moscow Spetnaz 136 defeated Taiwon Dolphins 106
Nottingham Hoods 127 lost to Swedish Metal 142
Well, not calculating the percentages... but looks like Swansea and Sao Paulo from group 1? Or Did Serbia make up the percentage on Swansea?
For Group B, its Mexico City and Bangladesh
For Group C, its Buenos Aires and Winchester
For Group D, its Swedish and did Moscow make up the percentage on Nottingham?
Looks like my Worlds have 3, possibly 4 (maybe 2 lol) in it?
Dolphins got thrashed, that's for sure.
Was always going to happen in our rebuilding year.
Well at least one team from Asia makes it through. Disappointed I expected more. The Dolphins were always going to struggle going through a rebuild, but the Lambs and my Folders should have done more.
Oh well, let's hope that the Bears do well and can go deep in this competition, and then we can win the World Cup ;)
Quote from: BB67th on April 15, 2014, 03:34:46 PM
Well at least one team from Asia makes it through. Disappointed I expected more. The Dolphins were always going to struggle going through a rebuild, but the Lambs and my Folders should have done more.
Oh well, let's hope that the Bears do well and can go deep in this competition, and then we can win the World Cup ;)
Don't worry Crocs will be there next year BB :P
Group A: Sao Paulo and Swansea
Swansea 405 points 391 points against for 103.6%
Serbia 434 points 420 points against for 103.3%
eagles very very unlucky scoring alot more points, the difference was they played an inform Pumas.
Group B Mexico City and Bangladesh
Group C Buenos Aires and Winchester
Group D Sweden and Moscow
Moscow 408 points 385 points against 106%
Nottingham 408 points 392 points against 104%
interesting enough the teams that drew, ended up on the same points but Moscow walks away with the win.
Quote from: BB67th on April 15, 2014, 03:34:46 PM
Well at least one team from Asia makes it through. Disappointed I expected more. The Dolphins were always going to struggle going through a rebuild, but the Lambs and my Folders should have done more.
Oh well, let's hope that the Bears do well and can go deep in this competition, and then we can win the World Cup ;)
Yeah I expected more from the Lambs as well but was always going to be a struggle missing 3 of our best 5 forwards (Tippett, Dixon and Knights). Hopefully we can give it another crack next year!
Well done boys
Woo made it through! Wasn't sure if I would after that first round, but glad the form turned around. Unlucky holz, going out on percentage sucks. But good news for everyone else that the strong Eagles are out :)
Three British Teams through Breakers, Hoods and Werewolves
Quote from: Honey Badger on April 15, 2014, 04:47:14 PM
Woo made it through! Wasn't sure if I would after that first round, but glad the form turned around. Unlucky holz, going out on percentage sucks. But good news for everyone else that the strong Eagles are out :)
Yeah I think people dodged a bullet there. I normally score 145+ each week. Just hit with injuries at the wrong time. Lecras last week and Goddard this week coupled with outs like Barlow and Lids.
Still you need to perform all year to win the champs and the Eagles didn't do that.
Next year Eagles and Dublin so that will be dangerous.
Europeans missing out because of evenness of competition?
Quote from: ossie85 on April 15, 2014, 05:37:02 PM
Europeans missing out because of evenness of competition?
I think this is a big reason. this may be bias but I see Serbia and Sweden ahead by abit so not suprised metal went through. Serbia should have easily made it through just got unlucky with matchups and injuries. Than there are quite a few good teams behind the big 2 and a few easy beats right at the bottom.
Holz did you factor that into your scaling?
In Euros as you said Goddard going down hurt you but in Worlds if that happens to a team they get a sub to replace them so their score isn't hurt as bad...
I'm assuming you didn't factor this in but oh well #Metaldidntneedit
Quote from: Nails on April 15, 2014, 08:43:43 PM
Holz did you factor that into your scaling?
In Euros as you said Goddard going down hurt you but in Worlds if that happens to a team they get a sub to replace them so their score isn't hurt as bad...
I'm assuming you didn't factor this in but oh well #Metaldidntneedit
no I didn't factor that in, it does gives the worlds a little advantage as I would have gone through if we had subs in the euro.
British also has sub but is a slightly bigger advantage for them than Worlds.
Quote from: Nails on April 15, 2014, 09:19:45 PM
British also has sub but is a slightly bigger advantage for them than Worlds.
If I account for them now I'll go through so that seems a little bias. As I'm the only one suffering from it will keep it this year.
match ups will be up later today
We now play each of the 7 other teams right?
The British scores seem to dominate, in the last round I was up against a total of 163! I think only one team in EXV history has got a score that high! (Metal that one time?)Oh well, best of luck to the remaining teams :)
Think Metal have got 163 a few times.
In Euros Grand Final Metal got a 180 something.
Do note forget the factor scrads Euros have .22 advantage on British.
Werewolves are really dominating British this year, Already have higher scores than last year as well.