3 rookie mids

[starz]

with the amount of rookies in the mids and the lack of them else where is it too much to put three rookie in the mids on the ground

[Capt Cunners]

I did

[West Coast Fanatics]

I would not say that is wise. The rookies will not get you the points you would get with the extra gun, or possibly mid-priced player. The saving of cash isn't justifiable for the points.

[starz]

look at it this way its either franklin and barlow
or cooney and rickliff

[West Coast Fanatics]

Cooney and Rockliff. I'm terrible at SC, though.

[starz]

ok then wat do you think of this team
godd,enright,fish,hodge,malceki,hunt,ladson
maguire,sligvani

abblett,pendles,mitchell.coon.trengrove.martin
barlow,shuey

sandi,nic nat
roughy,skipper

roo,pav,franklin,hall,danger,ziebell,rickliff
hitchy,pods

[West Coast Fanatics]

Thats pretty good.

[starz]

or is this better
good, enright shaw hodge mal hunt ladson
maguire sligvani

abblet pendle mitchell trengrove martin barlow
banner shuey

sandi nicnat
warnock skipper

roo pav franklin gray hall danger ziebell
rocky pods

[S_Coach99]

I would not say that is wise. The rookies will not get you the points you would get with the extra gun, or possibly mid-priced player. The saving of cash isn't justifiable for the points.

aaah the saving of cash I can agree, but the making of cash is a different story. You're probably going to have to have 1-2-3 rookies somewhere, so if all the good ones are in the middle, the way the justify it is mid's score more, you won't have the benefits at first, but they will be there.....if you can get your timing right, it's the best strategy this year in my opinion.

[jimmytigs]

Like your 2nd team marginally better but had to think about it,either way id hate to come up against 2 many teams like yours in my league,there pretty good,only concerns being 2 & 3 rookies on field in mids but they are good ones,also on team 1,2 rucks on bench very iffy,concerns with malceski for both teams & wouldnt bother with hitchcock in team 1