bored? leave your opinions please

[dogsss]

a little puzzled of which seems the better choice.

a) kurt tippett, daniel rockliff and sam fisher. $24000 leftover
b) mitch clark, daniel rockliff and joel macdonald. $21400 leftover
c) mark seaby, hayden ballantyne and sam fisher. $2300 leftover

option c is more as a backup option if daniel rockliff doesn't start round 1.

cheers guys.

[reesbr]

i'd go a

[mjpaps]

definately A
 

[Torress]

i'd go C
 - don't see tippet being a keeper for an entire year - there will be better rucks with higher overall scores. and seaby is prob the best low priced ruckmen - i'd use seaby as a cow and trade in midway. prob would rather mayne than balla but anyway, balla has way more security than rockliff

[SCADDICT]

a or b , wouldnt touch  option c with a ten foot pole.

[tnator]

It'll be an A from me

[tomsully]

a for me

[MrRiosWan]

D for me

[dogsss]

thanks for the replies....

so not much love for mitch clark or joel macdonald? basing their averages from last season clark/macdonald has a slightly better average of 94.4/68.2 vs tippett/fisher of 72.7/85. so is option A chosen more because there is more upside in tippett/fisher over clark/macdonald?

scaddict- if option C is never an option which defender/ruck/forward combination would you have if rockliff isn't picked round one with $1,050,000 to spend?

wuts option D?

[MelbourneCrow]

A for sure